Rays Exploit Astros’ Unrest, Force Game 5

In the fourth inning of Tuesday night’s Game 4, with José Altuve on first base, one out, and the Rays already up by three, Yordan Álvarez hit a deep fly ball to right-center field. You’d have been forgiven, in this home run-happy era, for thinking at first that the ball had left the park. You’d similarly have lost not one whit of credibility had you assumed that Kevin Kiermaier, one of the best center fielders of his era, might catch the ball on the run. But neither of those two things happened; the ball instead bounced beautifully off the right-center field wall and hung, for just a moment, in the air above Kiermaier’s head. That was the moment — when the ball hung briefly in stark contrast against dark blue — in which Gary Pettis, the Astros’ third-base coach since 2014, had to decide whether to send Altuve home.

As Ben Clemens pointed out in the game chat, our WPA Inquirer suggests that at the time Pettis made his decision, the Astros would have had about a 28.1% chance of winning the game had Altuve stopped at third, a 17.7% chance of winning the game if he went and was thrown out (which is what happened), and a 29.8% chance of winning the game had he run and scored. That distribution suggests, all other things being equal, that Pettis had to believe Altuve was likely to score at least 86% of the time in order to justify sending him (29.8 – 17.7 = 12.1; 12.1 * 0.86 + 17.7 = 28.1). Given that math, I find it hard to fault Pettis for his choice to run Altuve. It took two essentially perfect throws, from Keirmaier and Willy Adames in turn, plus a terrific tag from Travis d’Arnaud, to get Altuve at the plate by a hair. I know it won’t make the Astros feel better given the result, but it was fun to watch.

But let’s get to the reason the Astros’ odds were below 30% in the fourth in the first place: Justin Verlander. Verlander threw a gem in Friday’s Game 1, striking out eight and allowing just one hit across seven shutout innings. He’s had a terrific regular season, and he’ll be a Hall of Famer one day. But he didn’t have it Tuesday night on short rest, allowing four runs, seven hits, and three walks across just three and two-thirds innings pitched. Craig Edwards anticipated that ineffectiveness for us when he considered the question of Verlander on short rest, noting that in 10 “Low Velo” starts in 2019, in which Verlander’s fastball sat below his season average, his results suffered accordingly: a 4.00 FIP, a 6.4% walk rate, and 1.51 home runs allowed per nine innings.

That wasn’t the problem Tuesday night, as Verlander’s fastball sat near 96 mph throughout his outing. Rather the issue was that he simply couldn’t find the strike zone with his breaking pitches, and when he did — as with a changeup left in the middle of the zone against Tommy Pham in the first — they often didn’t break much, meaning Tampa’s bats found them and hit them. Later in his outing, when he retired six of eight and recorded three of his five strikeouts on the night, he found some success throwing his curveball up in the zone, but by that point the three runs he’d allowed in his first had already sunk his night and his team. Six Tampa hits left the bat at more than 100 mph, and in a season during which Verlander allowed just 32% of his runs on non-homers, half of the Rays’ four runs came on balls that stayed inside the park.

Given that early ineffectiveness, it was somewhat curious that AJ Hinch first got his bullpen going only when Verlander put two runners on with two outs in the second and his team was already down three. Verlander got out of that jam, striking out Avisaíl García, and didn’t end up exiting until near the end of the fourth, but with Gerrit Cole lined up for a Game 5 start, an off day in between, and Verlander clearly not at his best, I would have thought that Hinch might have worked more quickly to stop the bleeding with either Josh James or José Urquidy, both of whom got into the game later. Hinch clearly thought his chances were better with Verlander, or at least that he wanted to try to cover his outs with his starter in a game he could afford to lose. Still, I wonder how things might have gone for Houston if Verlander hadn’t still been around in the fourth to give up a home run to Willy Adames and make it 4-0.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Let’s not give Hinch too much guff for that, though. The Rays did a terrific job throughout the game at putting the bat on the ball and creating trouble for Astros pitchers and the management making decisions behind them. Houston didn’t have a 1-2-3 inning on the mound until the seventh, and Pham, Ji-Man Choi, and García, in particular, each had excellent nights at the plate. It didn’t hurt Tampa’s case one bit that those three men hit back-to-back-to-back in the Rays’ lineup.

On the pitching side, the Rays found success with Diego Castillo as their opener and a succession of competent relievers behind him. The death of the starter may have been greatly exaggerated for the league as a whole but it’s still finding currency in St. Pete. Castillo looked particularly good striking out Altuve with a sinker in the first:

Ryan Yarbrough followed him with two workmanlike innings (helped out by a little bit of athleticism by Choi at first base). That success, and in particular Castillo’s ability to get through the first without forcing Kevin Cash to Brandon McKay, allowed the Rays to play matchups for much of the remainder of the night to remarkably positive effect.

The exception, of course, was Colin Poche and Emilio Pagán’s work in the eighth and ninth innings. In the eighth, Poche allowed a home run to Robinson Chirinos that made the score 4-1. That didn’t feel too consequential until the ninth, when Pagán put Alex Bregman and Altuve on first and third, respectively, after a walk and a single. That forced Kevin Cash to bring in Blake Snell to face Álvarez with two runners on, one out, and an entire season’s worth of baseball on the line. Snell struck Álvarez out with three straight fastballs and a curve, then retired Yuli Gurriel to end the game and extend the series, but his appearance might limit his availability in Thursday’s clincher.

All is not lost for the Astros, who’ll get to start Cole at home on Thursday for Game 5. The Rays will start Tyler Glasnow (who threw in Game 1), though it seems likely Snell will at least make an appearance. Why not, when the season is on the line? Given the pitching matchup and location, I’m comfortable picking the Astros as the likely team to advance to the ALCS against the Yankees, but the beauty of playoff baseball, the beauty of elimination games, is it could really be either squad. That’s what the Rays bought themselves in front of their hometown fans Tuesday night: The chance for another night of baseball, when anything could happen.





Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.

54 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
abpow
6 years ago

Poche allowed the HR to Chirinos, not Pagan. However, the first two hitters Pagan faced made loud outs to the warning track before he gave up the walk and single that led to his departure.

Dave TMember since 2025
6 years ago

I wondered if Hinch would pull Verlander after 2 innings or so just based on a thought process that Verlander wasn’t looking any more effective than what the Astros could reasonably expect from Urqueddy and mop-up relievers, so why have Verlander out there throwing more pitches on short rest? (Verlander ended up at 84 pitches in 3.2 innings.)

But I guess Hinch had decided that Verlander wouldn’t be available for any work in Game 5 in any case, and that he wasn’t worried about an impact on Verlander’s effectiveness in the ALCS (if the Astros win Game 5 and get there).

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

That game was worth close to nothing for the Astros. It was the Rays season, but everything stacks up better in game 5 for HOU. They did the right thing to just punt after JV didn’t have it. I think HOU will have everything they would want available and rested for a home game with the best pitcher in baseball on the mound. They have to be thrilled that TB used Snell last night as well.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

lol -14 votes.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

Starting verlander on short rest smells of ‘our rotation isn’t good enough’. This isn’t how you win championships.

nenrightMember since 2020
6 years ago

miley’s last 5 or so starts in the regular season might really hurt them.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  nenright

It already has

Jonathan Sher
6 years ago
Reply to  nenright

Urquidy in September had a 1.50 ERA in 18 innings, including two starts in which he gave up 1 earned run, 4 hits, 2 walk and had 12 strikeouts in 11 innings, with one of those games in Houston against a good hitting team in Oakland. Miley was not going to start a game but Urquidy should have.

Postseason Starts (mainly by aces) on Short Rest, 2000-2013
Starts 54
IP 287
ERA 4.80
WHIP 1.42
Team Record 20-34

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

Huh? They have the best pitcher in baseball on full rest at home for the deciding game. That checks out to me rotation-wise. I probably am missing something in your comment.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

By that reasoning why did they even bother to show up for game 4? It’s in the bag anyway.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

Exactly. There was no harm in seeing if they could put up ten runs in the first. Anything can happen in any game. They showed up because they had to… and every TB resource that was used benefited them. HOU is in the best position they could hope to be in for this series. The downside is the next series as Cole won’t be ready… but that is why they showed up for game 4. Heck even game 4 had YA with a chance to tie it in the 9th. That 3 run first had two seeing-eye ground balls. TB got all the breaks and it was still with reach in the 9th.They didn’t get blown out of the water even with Verlander’s ghost out there.

notdeananna
6 years ago

2009 Yankees

MichaelMember since 2020
6 years ago

Upvoted, but ironically

curt schillings ketchup bottle
6 years ago

I had a feeling back in late September, if the rays survived the coin flip wild card game, they would be a dangerous draw for the Astros or any team they faced. Their pitching staff is extremely overlooked and it’s remarkable what they were able to do all year long with a bad year from Snell, a bunch of missed time by glasnow, and turmoil in the relief corps in the first half of the season. For all the love the Astros pitching staff got, the rays was statiscally better and Charlie Morton was as good as any pitcher in baseball.

If I’m the Yankees, I’m not feeling so good about this series going to 5 games. They might be able to outslug the Astros, but they’re not going to outpitch the rays and Aaron boone definitely isn’t going to outmanage cash

Wegandi727
6 years ago

The Yankees pitching is worse which magnifies HOU advantage as their lineup is the deepest in the game. I think the Yankees would rather face the Rays (especially with HFA as my Rays are god-awful in Yankee stadium) and are glad the series went 5 as this messes up the optimal G1-G7 starting rotation for each club. As a Rays fan I actually thought this series against HOU was going to be the “easiest” if we are to make it to the WS. The Yankees play us much harder than the Astros, national pontificating aside. I’m hoping Glass shows the national audience how truly dominant he is and we get just enough of Cole. I’m suspecting Rays 2-1 over the Astros, then we lose series 4-2 against NYY. Let’s see how off base I am!

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

You might be underestimating the Yankees a bit on both sides of the ball. The Yankees outscored the Astros (and everyone else) despite playing their B team for much of the year. Their lineup is now as healthy as it has been all year. Similarly, on the pitching side the Yankees are in better shape now than they have been all year. They’ve got Paxton, Tanaka, and Severino all in good form, and the starters are only ever asked to go through a lineup twice. They then march out a parade of dominant bullpen arms. Their pitching staff is built for playoff baseball.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

for Houston- the difference is pretty meaningless. Instead of Verlander, Cole, Greinke going 1-3, it’ll be Greinke, Verlander, and Cole. Some ways may make it harder as Greinke might be better going at home…

For Tampa- it’ll all hinge on how the game 5 plays out. If they don’t have to use Morton, he can go game 1 of the LCS. Seems pretty ideal to me.

Richie
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Only way they don’t use Morton is if they’re up 6 runs going into the 8th inning (and even then I bet they’ll have him getting loose, just in case)

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
6 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

As a Yankee fan, I’m not overlooking the Rays at all. I’d rather face the Rays though, but I am a bit shook over how they might fare against Morton (historically has pitched well against the Yankees, and against them in the playoffs), Glasnow pitching at 110% effort in a short outing, and of course Snell, even if the Yankees hammered him a couple times this season. Not even mentioning the bullpen.

A lot of Yankees fans are of course rooting for the Rays to beat Houston, but I feel too many of them are overlooking the Rays like they did the Twins. It worked out against the Twins, I wouldn’t bet on it being that easy against the Rays. I do think a Rays-Yankees series would be a lot of fun though. Even if the Yankees lost a hypothetical series to the Rays, I would probably root for them, they have a solid and fun team.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago

If the astros win game 5, the yankees should feel good about it going so long. Cole will be unavailable for the first few games. Verlander may still be feeling the effects of pitching on short rest; this often shows up later. And the astros will have admitted that they have only two starters that they trust in big games.

Dave TMember since 2025
6 years ago

I don’t think it’s that big of an issue how the Astros’ rotation would be set up for the ALCS if they win Game 5. They’d still have Verlander for Game 2 (on normal rest after today) and Cole for Game 3 (on normal rest after Thursday), then set up to come back for potential Games 6 and 7 on normal rest.

It’s “2367” rather than “1256” for those 2 pitchers. The Astros understandably would prefer the latter set-up, but it’s still a series where the Yankees are going to win some of the Cole and Verlander starts (or not) and the Astros are going to win some of the Greinke and 4th starter starts (or not) with the number of starts for each pitcher being the same if the series goes to 7 games.

The really good scenario for the Yankees was an ALDS Game 5 where both Cole and Verlander pitched enough that it called into question their availability to pitch on 2-days rest in Game 2 of the ALCS.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

They won’t have the option of either verlander or cole in games 1 and 5 and pitching a few innings on short rest in game 7. Not a big disadvantage but a disadvantage. Pitching verlander on short rest yesterday may have sime effect on him later. And psychologically they’ve dissed the rest of their rotation pretty much right off the bat.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

They would have it set up with Greinke, Verlander, Cole in games 1-3 and then 5-7..

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

The idea of greinke pitching on short rest in game 7 doesn’t quite have the impact as cole or verlander doing it

BrendanMember since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

I agree — but there is a slight disadvantage for them not going with one of either Verlander or Cole in Game 1 of the ALCS. Ideally they would want to lead with one of those guys on full rest to smack the Yankees in the mouth to start the series, and instead it will be Greinke (probably). He’s capable of doing the same, but he doesn’t have the same “shock and awe” factor that Verlander/Cole do on normal rest (yesterday wasn’t that).

I think the decision spoke to concern about the rotation past Greinke — and it probably is a justified concern. Miley has been really bad in September — pitching him was a very unattractive option, and while you would have had Verlander on full rest Thursday, it “feels wrong” to go with Miley or someone else in Game 4 if you have the chance to close it out with one of your best pitchers, and then save Cole to start of the ALCS with a smothering performance against the Yankees. Turns out that isn’t on the table now, but it made sense for them to approach it that way.

Richie
6 years ago

Well, they trust Greinke too, game 3 notwithstanding.

BrendanMember since 2018
6 years ago

And yet the Yankees, with their horrific pitching, terrible management, and motley crew of washed up overpaid strike-out prone has-been power hitters managed to win 12 of 19 against the Rays this season. Funny, huh?

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

Are they really dangerous? I am pretty sure HOU is in a position of the overwhelming favorite. Not much has actually changed despite the way it feels. Vegas has Hou as -240.

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Being overwhelming favourites in baseball means that Houston has something like a 42% chance of losing heading into the game.

docgooden85Member since 2018
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

Houston -240 implies Vegas doesn’t give the Rays a 42% chance of winning. The stated line of HOU -240 implies about 71% HOU vs. 29% TB. (It also implies the public is betting on Houston).

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  docgooden85

I took the 42% figure from oddshark: https://www.oddsshark.com/mlb/tampa-bay-houston-odds-october-10-2019-1196749

It has since moved down to 41%.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

The guy below you gets it. Its -270 now anyways. Anyone can win any game but that is extremely lopsided as you are clearly new to betting lines. I would imagine that is even a bit skewed to TB as they have the more rabid fans at the moment placing bets.

Dave TMember since 2025
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

We can quibble over the exact percentages, but basically what London Yank said.

The Fangraphs / ZiPS odds now show the Rays with about a 35% chance to win this series. IIRC, that percentage was about 5% before Game 3 and about 15% before Game 4. It’s undeniable that the Rays have *dramatically* improved their chances of winning this series just by virtue of being tied 2-2 rather than down 2-0 or 2-1.

And, beyond just winning Games 3 and 4, the other less important details went pretty much as well as the Rays could hope. Verlander was used on short rest in a loss, so it’s just Cole in Game 5 rather than the potential for fully-rested Cole and fully-rested Verlander both available. They won Game 4 without any of their pitchers throwing more than 29 pitches, and with only Poche pitching in both Games 3 and 4, so they’ve got a full complement of pitchers available for Game 5 and relatively well-rested. About the only detail that could have gone better for the Rays would have been if Snell threw no pitches rather than 8 in Game 4, but he’s still available for some amount of work in Game 5.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  Dave T

I disagree with just about everything you said.

Why would they need much more than Cole? If Cole gets smashed, then they probably lose anyways. Hard to see him going less than 6 if he isn’t broken. This is the unquestioned Cy Young winner. Some SP out of the bullpen is dicey stuff.

TB completely used up Castillo, who is one of their top RP. Snell isn’t an RP – pitching a high leverage inning definitely hurts. Its not about 8 pitches – he was sweating out there. HOU is the team that used nobody in game 4. I guess we can just disagree but I think your view is pretty far removed from reality. I do agree that going from 0-2 to 2-2 does improve your chances but the realities are heavily slanted towards HOU.

Wegandi727
6 years ago

Cole is a fantastic pitcher with probably the best stuff in the game right now, but how can you say you can be comfortable in your choice and use the pitching MU as the evidence. Glasnow is nearly as unhittable as Cole (maybe more so; an argument can be made) and you have Snell (who has actually increased his all ready dominant swing and miss stuff compared to last year even if on-field results haven’t followed) and Morton available along with the pen of arms to match up. If anything the edge for HOU has always been their lineup potency. Statistically, the Rays have the better pitching staff and in an anything goes game, I give them the edge (I’m also biased of course, but I’d put Glass, Snell, and Morton against anyone even the HOU big 3) there. The Rays were also one of the best road teams all season, and the Astros the best home-team. This will be an epic game 5. I’m rooting for my Rays, but keep in mind this will probably be the worst Rays team of the next 3-5 years. Looking forward to the years to come and the big future games against HOU and NYY. (Which is to say, the AL is probably at an all-time low parity wise and no one cares about the AL Central because it’s probably the worst division in baseball; sorry AL central fans)

OrangeJoos
6 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

The Rays caused the Astros problems all season and the Astros are generally uncomfortable against contact teams which is why I agree that the Yankees are a better contest for the Astros who if they get past the Rays will be relieved, the Rays and even my A’s are a bad match for them.

You also can’t say with certainty that this is the worst rays team in 3-5 years as prospects are pure guess work, I mean Vlad Jnr was supposed to be Miggy 2.0 or Prime Pujols but was very underwhelming and many prospects miss their projections, Buxton being the biggest, took him 4-5 years to put a decent season together.

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  OrangeJoos

Are the Rays a contact team? They rank 21st in baseball in team SO% at 23.8%. The Yankees rank 12th at 23%. The Yankees are a much more difficult lineup for the Astros than the Rays are.

jamesdakrnMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

One thing the Yankees have going against Houston is the platoon disadvantage though – most of their great hitters are right handed and they’ve struggled mightily vs. Verlander/Cole (then again, you’d be hard pressed to find a team that DIDN’T struggle vs. those 2 this season)

dl80Member since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

That’s true, but if you look at the Rays’ individual hitters, the only regular with a K at or above that 23.8% is Willy Adames (26.2%). The team rate is skewed by guys like the Lowes and Zunino who aren’t really going to play much if at all.

The Yankees, on the other hand, have 3 starters at 23.8% or above: Voit, Judge, and Sanchez.

Maybe the difference is offset by LeMahieu’s really low K rate. And either way, it won’t really matter much, but the Yankees do have 2-3 guys who strike out a lot.

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Voit has not had a single at bat this postseason, so he probably should not be classified as a starter here. Voit’s at bats have all gone to Urshela who has a really low strikeout rate.

London Yank
6 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

But you can add Giancarlo Stanton into the high K mix.

The Yankees contact hitters are: LeMahieu, Gregorious, Urshela, and Gardner. Gleyber Torres and Encarnacion are about average, so 67% of the lineup have respectable contact skills.

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Lost me with Lowe not playing. Lowe will be playing. Despite having struckout in 50% of his plate appearances this postseason, I’d be very surprised if Brandon Lowe isn’t in the starting lineup tomorrow. 50% somehow is the standard K rate vs Cole these days, so a guy who has speed and can run into one imo is more valuable vs the most dominant pitcher in baseball than a more contact oriented hitter. I could be wrong, but I’d venture Lowe is starting tomorrow.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

The extent that TB is being overrated is absurd. Cole is a huge advantage over whatever TB does. TB won two games that HOU didn’t really need. Sure, HOU would have liked a sweep, but they always had game 5 in their back pocket at home with Cole knowing that TB would have to burn up what they have after taking the first two.

TB isn’t building anything.They are burning the candle at both ends. Luck is going to go against them at some point I would guess. This has to be something near the best-case scenario over the past two years. I would be happy to bet you that this is not the worst team of the next 5 years. Pretty much every arm spent time on the DL this year – that is how they use their players. They don’t develop, they use them up.

martyvan90Member since 2026
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Ronnie, are you the guy talking to George?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTMixF2Iwy4

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Wegandi727

Cole to me is the best pitcher in the game. With that said, Glasnow was nearly as dominant this year in albeit many fewer innings. I wonder what his limit is tomorrow? If its a 0-0 game, or a 1 run game going into the 6th, is he still out there? Ideally for the Rays they have Morton in game 1 vs the Yankees. He is an ace, and better than anyone the Yankees have. But you have to figure he going to be ready to go tomorrow as well. if I had to guess I’d bet Glasnow+ Castillo+ Snell in ideal circumstances, with Morton most likely in the game barring a large lead either direction.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

I’m glad someone on the AL side is trying to make things interesting. The Twins-Yankees series was such a bore. Plus, I like it when wild-card teams beat the odds and go deep.

johnforthegiants
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

We may well get two of them this year.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

I am shocked that nobody is talking about how bad Altuve’s slide was. He didn’t even attempt to touch home plate. He may as well have just went straight to the dugout – that is actually what he did. If he would have slid into home plate it would have been very close, but he didn’t. It was a good relay, but it also would have been a bang-bang play if he Altuve didn’t’ make a huge mistake on that slide. You could see how upset Altuve was with the mistake that he made. He was trying to tap the back edge of the plate… which is only a good idea on a bad throw (up the line or short). That really was a bonehead play by Altuve as a relay from a middle infielder isn’t going to be up the line – those type of throws come from outfielders.

carterMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Are you a troll account? Honestly. It is like your takes are intentionally trying to get downvotes.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  carter

Notice the lack of discussion. That is why I do it. There is not that much actual baseball being discussed. I am not a Rays fanboy and it make me pretty out of place here. I am still shocked that nobody else noticed that Altuve did not try to touch home plate. I would like to talk about the on field baseball, but this isn’t the place apparently. I like to think that this community can benefit from discussion. I also know that there are not a lot of baseball minded people here so I try to help with that. I don’t mean that as the insult that it sounds like. I mean people here are more concerned with percentages and most seem to not understand what takes place on the field. That part is missing from this community and I am trying to help. Sure, I am a contrarian by nature and I do enjoy rattling a cage or two, but that isn’t my goal. My takes are quite simply not treating game four like it was a WS win and pointing out the huge advantage that HOU has in game 5. I don’t like HOU either if that matter for anything, but they have a decided advantage. Look, ATL and TB are the two unofficial FG teams and honestly that does bother me a bit.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

Re: That Altuve play – I don’t know that was a bad decision to send him. If he actually slid into home I think he would have been safe – it would have been very close. My first reaction was that he was safe because he was going to beat the throw, but instead he tried to avoid the tag and was obviously out. Don’t blame Pettis for Altuve’s poor execution. I also though that he could have probably made it to second when he stopped at first on the previous play which would have changed that whole scenario.

You are comfortable picking the Astros, eh? Vegas has them at -280 so that isn’t much of a limb to go out on. If the Rays lose tonight, then along with the Braves loss 99% of the fair weather fans will lose interest. At that point we would be left with baseball fans talking baseball as opposed to the tiresome progressive narrative. A man can dream.

jcarpe14Member since 2017
6 years ago

tough tough team ,the Astros .to beat them you have to play your best game. not a cheap out on their lineup.it will be fun tonight

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  jcarpe14

C is a cheap out. Maldonado made two outs in two pitches last night.