Red Sox Extend Defensive Phenom Ceddanne Rafaela

A month after signing starting pitcher Brayan Bello to a six-year extension, the Boston Red Sox are at it again, this time extending rookie center fielder Ceddanne Rafaela on an eight-year deal worth $50 million. If Rafaela sticks in the majors long enough this season to earn a year of service time, this extension will prolong his free agent eligibility for two years; either way, he’ll be paid a guaranteed salary through the 2031 season.
How you feel about Rafaela comes down to just what you think about his defense. Eric Longenhagen and Tess Taruskin rated Rafaela as the only prospect on THE BOARD last year with a 70 present value for defense and the only one with a future value of 80. They were hardly alone in their praise for his glove, either, as other outlets such as Baseball Prospectus and MLB Pipeline also gave complimentary reviews to his leathercraft.
While prospect writers have occasionally missed on the eventual defensive performance of prospects – Gregory Polanco comes to mind – Rafaela certainly hasn’t shown anything in his limited time in the majors that refutes these views. Measuring minor league defense, as opposed to viewing it, is fraught with obvious peril, but the defensive estimates that ZiPS uses for minor leaguers also love his glove. ZiPS uses a Total Zone-esque measure from Gameday hit locations, similar to Sean Smith’s methodology from nearly 15 years ago. Yes, we’d prefer to have something like OAA or DRS or even UZR for minor leaguers publicly available, but we don’t, so we have to generally be more conservative about conclusions drawn from the data. But for what it’s worth, these estimates, which I call zDEF, had Rafaela as an elite defensive center fielder in the minors in 2023.
| Player | Runs |
|---|---|
| Jorge Barrosa | 19.8 |
| Ceddanne Rafaela | 10.2 |
| Drew Avans | 9.9 |
| Jake Mangum | 9.7 |
| Michael Siani | 9.5 |
| Jaden Rudd | 8.5 |
| Jud Fabian | 8.4 |
| Maddux Houghton | 8.1 |
| Victor Scott II | 8.0 |
| Pete Crow-Armstrong | 7.9 |
Incidentally, zDEF had Rafaela at +3 as a shortstop total for his minor league career, so if the circumstances warranted it, it wouldn’t necessarily be the craziest thing to see him follow in the footsteps of another former Red Sox prospect, Mookie Betts, and move back to shortstop at some point, though that certainly is not why Boston signed Rafaela long term.
Let’s run the eight-year ZiPS for Rafaela.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | .258 | .299 | .424 | 517 | 78 | 134 | 28 | 9 | 13 | 77 | 24 | 134 | 20 | 101 | 8 | 2.2 |
| 2025 | .254 | .296 | .413 | 520 | 74 | 132 | 26 | 6 | 15 | 63 | 25 | 133 | 18 | 97 | 8 | 2.2 |
| 2026 | .258 | .300 | .423 | 527 | 77 | 136 | 27 | 6 | 16 | 65 | 26 | 128 | 18 | 101 | 8 | 2.4 |
| 2027 | .258 | .304 | .424 | 528 | 79 | 136 | 27 | 5 | 17 | 67 | 28 | 124 | 17 | 102 | 8 | 2.5 |
| 2028 | .258 | .306 | .425 | 527 | 80 | 136 | 27 | 5 | 17 | 67 | 30 | 120 | 16 | 103 | 8 | 2.6 |
| 2029 | .258 | .307 | .423 | 523 | 80 | 135 | 27 | 4 | 17 | 66 | 31 | 117 | 14 | 102 | 7 | 2.5 |
| 2030 | .256 | .306 | .416 | 515 | 78 | 132 | 26 | 4 | 16 | 64 | 31 | 114 | 13 | 100 | 7 | 2.3 |
| 2031 | .256 | .306 | .418 | 500 | 75 | 128 | 25 | 4 | 16 | 62 | 30 | 112 | 12 | 101 | 7 | 2.3 |
All told, ZiPS would happily offer him an eight-year, $67 million — $17 million more than what the Red Sox gave him.
One thing to take into consideration: So long as Rafaela’s glove is excellent, he doesn’t need to take a big offensive step forward to be worth his contract. ZiPS has Rafaela hitting for a skosh more power, enough to get his OPS+ and wRC+ into the 100 range during his peak years, but not sufficient to make him a superstar. As a result, his projections keep him in the solidly above-average territory – he’ll likely have an All-Star appearance or two during an up year – but comfortably below star status. These offensive numbers make him slightly better offensively than the inevitable comp given for him, Jackie Bradley Jr., who put up a 93 OPS+ over parts of eight seasons in Boston and was a few runs better defensively than Rafaela’s projections. Suffice it to say, if ZiPS’s natural conservatism with minor league defensive numbers ends up lowballing Rafaela, he’d be a steal at this price and put up WAR numbers in the range of Kevin Kiermaier’s best years.
As an offensive player, Rafaela remains a work in progress. In nine games this season entering Tuesday, he’s hitting .233/.286/.400 with two triples and an 85 wRC+. He’s actually gotten better at making contact, going from a 69% contact rate at Triple-A last year to 73% in the majors so far. Admittedly, this improvement has come in a small sample — he’s made just 124 big league plate appearances combined between his 2023 late-season debut (72.1% contact in 89 PA) and this year (76.3% in his 35 PA) — but it is still encouraging.
That said, he remains far too aggressive at the plate, especially when you consider his specific profile as a hitter. Unlike his teammate Rafael Devers, who also swings at a pretty high rate of pitches out of the zone, Rafaela doesn’t hit the ball particularly hard; Devers has power to spare, so even though he doesn’t make as much hard contact on pitches out of the zone — his average exit velocity drops to 85.5 mph, down from 94.9 mph on in-zone pitches — he can still do damage. Rafaela doesn’t have that luxury. Instead, he is a speedster (ranking 28th in sprint speed this season among 202 qualified players) who plays his home games at Fenway Park, one of baseball’s best parks for batting average. He should be incentivized to have a more contact-oriented game than most other batters. His contact skills appear to be improving, but he won’t get the most out of his game if he keeps chasing pitches that’s he unlikely to hit.
The Betts trade and the departure of Xander Bogaerts are still, rightfully, pain points for Boston fans. But since then, the Red Sox seem to be making a better effort to retain the players they develop, first with the Devers extension in January 2023 and now with Bello and Rafaela. Ultimately, winning is the only thing that will make things better in Boston. Keeping Rafaela in town should be an important step toward that.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
I don’t mind this one as much as the Tovar extension, mainly because his offense has a higher ceiling than Tovar’s and his defense is probably better too. We’ll see how it goes.
Dan – thanks for the article. Could you help me reconcile the projections shown in this article with the 3-Year ZiPS on Ceddanne’s player page? His OPS projections for 2025 and 2026 are .742 and .763 in the 3-year forecast, while the table here shows .709 and .723. Seems like too big of a difference to be explained by a slightly slow start 9 games into the season, so I’m wondering what ZiPS is seeing
Mostly just updates since the start of the season to the model. Rafaela’s one of the biggest moves.
Thanks for the reply! Hoping the model updates are wrong in this case haha
Why don’t the player pages have updated projections?
I think Dan just runs the 3-year Zips once per offseason other than specific players for articles.
As a sox fan, I like the idea behind this deal and the Bello deal. In isolation, they are both net positive moves even if they probably won’t be massive bargains. As an organizational strategy (particularly for a big market team), it would be great if these extensions were a precursor to additional extensions (Casas please!) as well as free agency spending to fill in the gaps (pitching!).
However, as a fan who is fairly pessimistic of the current ownership group, I fear that ownership will use these deals to say “SEE!! We’re spending money and keeping homegrown talent, exactly what all you fans wanted.” And then proceed to skimp on free agency, not sign extensions that cost real money (like Casas), and generally avoid actually spending like a true big market team.
Given how Story’s deal is working out, how the Sale/Price contracts worked out, Yoshida and Devers on the books, I can understand why John Henry is a bit hesitant to want to make huge splashes. I actually don’t like their current approach of middling around, though, and think they should’ve went farther in on a total rebuild after the Betts trade if they weren’t interested in spending huge. Their half-assed way of doing things since they won it all in 2018 has only led to one playoff appearance 3 years ago, and a whole lot of hovering around 4th place in the meantime.
Bloom had a very funny (for me, as a fan of a rival team) habit of shopping around the middle of the wine list…which any restaurant manager will tell you is for suckers.
Real value, following team control, comes from truly elite players on the right side of 30, like Betts, and pre-arb extensions.
At the very least, it seems like Breslow is wise enough to order the house red.
Their big contracts haven’t generally worked out. Further, imagine if they had kept, say, Boegarts on a big contract. Sale, Boegaerts, Story, Price…these contracts are bad.
It’s easy to blame ownership when a player isn’t signed, but you have no idea what Casas is thinking or saying behind closed doors.
Boston is spending 180M this year on players and they are probably the worst team in their division. Overpaying for free agents right now is probably the worst thing they could do, and let’s be honest: they aren’t catching the Orioles (or likely the Yankees or Rays) anytime soon.
They could have kept Bogaerts on a Story-sized contract.
Instead, they offered him 4/$90m days after signing a worse player of the same age for 6/$140m.
I realize he only has 79 entries in Statcast but his max EV is only 107 and his average EV is in the mid 80s. That is incredibly bad. It makes me wonder how he hit that many home runs at AAA last year. It doesn’t seem possible for someone to hit the ball that lightly and perform like that anywhere, even at AAA. He must have more raw power in there somewhere but we haven’t seen it at all in MLB.
The risk here is minimal since becuase the Red Sox have zillions of dollars and they can afford to spread bets around. If he can learn to hit for even league average he will be a huge asset for the Red Sox, so this was probably a smart move.
But I am of the mind that this was a very wise move for Rafaela. This is life changing money and there is some bust risk going on here.
He’s got an Isaac parades thing going on where he pulls a lot of flyballs, obviously not to that extreme but he gets to more homers than his exit velocities would let on. He’s been putting up 200-300 ISOs in the minors. I’d guess his avg exit velo will never be great bc he swings a ton and thus hits a lot of flares and soft contact.
hope probably is he runs into enough homers to be a 100 wRC+ bat or so, which would be a really nice player w his glove. He definitely passes the projection tests as they seem to already think he’s a 90 wRC+ bat or so
I am so interested to see how the bat plays at the major league level. He ran a .220 ISO during his time at AA and AAA. I have such a hard time seeing him come anywhere close to that in the majors, the guy is just tiny and he does not have the exit velos to back it up.
Assuming that Roman Anthony is going to reach the majors within a year or two, I wonder which one of them will stick in centerfield.
Based on these zDEF numbers, if I’m a GM on a rebuilding team I’m enquiring about Jorge Barrosa
It’s not exactly the same (more money for a player earlier in his career), but this reminds me a ton of Juan Lagares’ extension with the Mets.
The Mets’ bet was that Lagares’ defense would make him a great value (and IIRC, they got an option on his first FA year) relative to his potential arbitration payouts even if he bat went backwards. Lagares wound up getting hurt and it turned out he’d just peaked very early.
The downside on something like this is pretty low, no? If Rafaela just plain doesn’t hit, then would his defense make him livable? Would he just become an overpaid glove + legs 4th OF?
Lagares was worth 2.5 WAR/650 through age-30!
(1.5 after his two initial big years)
He was just hurt all the damn time.
Rafaela also has the advantage of being the strong side of the platoon.
When you say ZIPS would happily pay Rafaela 8/67, is there any discount built into that for taking on the risk of guaranteeing all of his arb years? Or is it more that ZIPS thinks that, if Rafaela went through arbitration, his arb payouts + two years of free agency would cost $67 million?
Overall, this seems like a better contract for the Red Sox than the Bello one. Where the Bello one is only really a good deal if he takes a step forward from his previous level of play, this one seems to get a bit of a discount for buying out arb and free agent years early.
So who are some good comps? Inciarte and Grisham seems like good ones; Kiermier an optimistic one.
Gary Pettis is instructive. From age 26 to 30 (the arb + FA years the Red Sox are getting in this contract), per BBREF, Pettis was:
2,570 PA, 74 OPS+, -54 Rbat, +28 Rbaser, +9 Rdp, +68 Rfield, +6 Rpos, 14.4 WAR, 2.9 WAR/season, 3.6 WAR/650 PA.
Rafaela seems at least a bit better with the bat but not likely to be quite as valuable on the bases. Seems like a pretty good value.