Reviewing Last Year’s Bunt Doubles

There are three primary benefits of spring training. One, all the players get to get ready for the regular season. Two, Arizona and Florida get to have people want to go there on purpose. Three, it’s like a two-minute warning for writers. It’s irrelevant, transitional baseball that reminds writers they’re running out of time to look back on the previous season. Right now, I can still get away with a post about stuff that happened in 2013. A month from now that’d be a waste of everyone’s time. So here’s a review of last season’s bunt doubles. If this doesn’t interest you, that’s fine, and soon enough we’ll have plenty of other posts about projections of the future that will turn out looking lousy in retrospect.

Here’s a fun fact for you: last year, there were more bunt doubles around baseball than Astros wins. That isn’t true, but here’s a fun fact that is true: last year, from September 13 onward, there were more bunt doubles around baseball than Astros wins. Two years ago, Quintin Berry bunted for a double for his first major-league hit. Juan Pierre also had a slap-bunt double, and that was it for the season. Last year, there were three legitimate bunt doubles. And to make things even more interesting, all three were different in structure and sequence. Below you’ll find .gifs, screenshots, and attempted explanations. Nothing here has been doctored, except for the players, who have probably been to the doctor.

BUNT DOUBLE NO. 1

Parra2B_1.gif.opt

In this game, Gerardo Parra bunted for a double, which is extremely rare. Later in this game, Gerardo Parra was called out running to first on batter interference, which is also very rare. This game went to 15 innings, which is rare, and there were blown saves on home runs in both the 13th and the 14th, which is rare. The Mets lost, which is common.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

With a runner on first, this was done by design. Check out the infield alignment that Parra would be hitting into:

parra2binfield

There was a hole there, and Parra believed he could bunt into it. He might not have believed he could bunt this much into it. Parra bunted a pitch at the letters and it came off the bat like a line drive. It squeezed all the way through to the outfield grass and Parra was thinking about extra bases almost right out of the box:

Parra2B_2.gif.opt

The unusual thing about this bunt double is that it is a double off of a bunt. But the other unusual thing is that the defense didn’t really do anything to allow it to happen. There was no mistake made, and there was no extreme shift. The ball didn’t take a funny bounce by anybody. Parra just bunted for a perfectly legitimate double that happened to not go particularly far from the infield. I can’t recall seeing a bunt struck with such force. In his previous at-bat, Parra swung away and hit a line drive that was caught on the fly. Let the record show that, last year, Parra was credited with a pair of infield doubles. Gerardo Parra might hit an infield homer before Ben Revere hits a regular homer.

BUNT DOUBLE NO. 2

Cano2B_1.gif.opt

I mentioned that, last year, there were three bunt doubles. The other two featured bunts of the first pitch. This was a bunt of the second pitch, after Cano swung away and fouled the first pitch off. Interestingly or not interestingly, after fouling off the first pitch, Cano took a few practice swings like normal, then called for time-out. Then he stepped back in and put the bunt down, obviously for the purpose of taking advantage of the shift. What was the purpose of the time-out? When did Cano make the decision to try a bunt? If Cano had literally said out loud “I am going to bunt”, would the Red Sox have done anything about it?

About that shift:

cano2binfield

That should give you a sense of how much space there was. From here it’s as if the Red Sox just forgot to play two infielders. Looking at this picture, you might wonder why we don’t see more bunt doubles. The answer is because batters are too afraid to bunt, because batters are too afraid to practice their bunts, because batters want to bat, at least the sorts of batters who cause other infields to shift against them. There are a whole lot of extreme shifts in baseball. This is how you can beat them literally every time, if you’re trained enough. Baseball players are idiots for not bunting more often. Sometimes people complain I don’t have enough strong opinions. This is one of them. Bunt more, idiots. If you don’t know how to bunt well enough, learn, idiots. If you can hit, then you can bunt, and, you can hit.

The last time Robinson Cano put a bunt in play, he doubled. The previous time he put a bunt in play, he singled. He has two fair bunts over the last two seasons. I’ll say this for Cano — no matter how much people get on him for not running hard, this double wasn’t automatic. He read this well immediately off the bat. It was actually the first of three doubles he’d hit in the game. Here’s where the other two wound up:

cano2b_2

cano2b_3

They all look the same in the box score, unless the box score includes play-by-play that denotes batted-ball type. Then two look like line drives and the other looks like a bunt.

Just for fun, here’s the Red Sox broadcast right before Cano squared around:

Orsillo: He’ll be a free agent at the end of the year and most think the Yankees will bring him back.
Eckersley: Oh, I can’t imagine, they can’t lose this guy. This — they’ll give him the house.

It can be real big to get that hustle extra base. In Cano’s case, it was the difference between standing on first with two down, and standing in scoring position. Cano got to second, and that set up an Alfonso Soriano swinging strikeout to end the top of the first. So that time the extra base was not real big.

BUNT DOUBLE NO. 3

McLouth2B_1.gif.opt

This one kills me, it just absolutely kills me. Gerardo Parra bunted into the hole and legged out a double without the defense doing anything wrong. Robinson Cano took the bunt hit the shifted defense was giving him, and because he bunted so well he got an extra base. Robinson Cano bunted for a double away from the shift. Nate McLouth bunted for a double into the shift.

mclouth2binfield

Given all the space in between the infielders, you could understand a perfect, soft bunt single. Nate McLouth bunted the ball through that. It seems the biggest problem is that the Rays infielders remembered to identify the baseball, but they neglected to do more than that:

mclouth2binfield_2

Wright: There’s the baseball!
Beckham: The baseball is right there!
Rodriguez: Right there! That is the baseball!
Wright: We are all in agreement!
Rodriguez: That is a baseball

The problem was this: Rodriguez came off the bag in making an attempt to field the bunt. Beckham saw that and responded by running over to cover. But, Wright was also going over to cover, and Beckham was the support in the hole, so there were two guys moving toward first and no guys moving toward the baseball. You’d think the Rays would be better trained for this. In fairness, it isn’t often you come across a bunt double into the shift. In fairness, maybe that’s because defenses are better trained for this. Unlike Parra and Cano, McLouth didn’t even have to slide.

The batter before McLouth was Matt Wieters. He led off with a double and got thrown out at third. This might’ve been just the teams trading stupid. McLouth didn’t score in the inning. The inning before, Manny Machado sustained his injury at first base. Now I’m just remembering that visual and I don’t want to think about this baseball game anymore.

Last season, there were three bunt doubles, each of them different but each of them inarguably bunt doubles. FanGraphs has no record of a year with more bunt doubles. One was pulled almost like a line drive. One was put down against an infield shift. One was put down into an infield shift. Will this coming season feature more than three bunt doubles? You’d figure the odds would be good, with infield shifting on the rise, but players need to actually bunt against those shifts in order for wish fulfillment. Any day now, guys. They’re practically giving you singles. Sometimes doubles.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
bhiggum
12 years ago

Last year, there were three legitimate bunt doubles…

BUNT DOUBLE NO. 1
Bunter: Gerardo Parra
BUNT DOUBLE NO. 2
Bunter: Robinson Cano
BUNT DOUBLE NO. 3
Bunter: Nate McLouth

Let the record show that, last year, Parra was credited with a pair of infield doubles…

So, is one of Parra’s illegitimate? I’d like to see this bastard infield double.

bhiggum
12 years ago
Reply to  Jake

Ah, gotcha. Not enough coffee yet this morning.
Too bad, I was hoping for more illegitimacy.

matt w
12 years ago
Reply to  bhiggum

Doubling past a falling on his face Dan Uggla is kinda illegitimate.

Hurtlockertwo
12 years ago

Very cool

Kyle in Illinois
12 years ago

Loved this piece, Jeff. How many times can you come up with a screen grab that shows six different baseball game participants all watching the baseball at the same time? Let alone the fact that the ball is on the ground…

Catoblepas
12 years ago

yeah that last screenshot is gold

Andy
12 years ago

My day is now ruined, to be spent searching for another game in history featuring a bunt double AND a putout by catcher interference AND two blown saves AND extra innings AND a season ending injury to an all-star.

Gabes
12 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Take the easy option he mentioned, search for a Mets loss.

Vilmos Ratajczyk
12 years ago

“If this doesn’t interest you, that’s fine, and soon enough we’ll have plenty of other posts about projections of the future that will turn out looking lousy in retrospect.”

So, FanGraphs hasn’t published its organization rankings for 2014 yet, eh?

Seriously, though, this was a great piece, Jeff.

PJB
12 years ago

One of the most enjoyable articles of 2014. Great work Jeff!

Klements Sausage
12 years ago

Fantastic article. Each bunt is mesmerizing in its own way. I don’t see much of the D-Backs but every time I see Parra he does something to wow me.

Love these pieces. Screw opinions Jeff, just keep doing these!

Bobert
12 years ago

Cano should have been called out. His foot was outside of the box when he made contact.

Hal
12 years ago
Reply to  Bobert

That’ll happen right after they start calling every Jordan Walden pitch illegal.

tylersnotes
12 years ago

We need a Jeff Sullivan Headline Generator

CB
12 years ago
Reply to  tylersnotes

But then what would we use Jeff Sullivan for???

astrostl
12 years ago

Thumbs up. I once saw Jim Edmonds hit a double on a checked swing.

phimu89
12 years ago

I would read ten articles everyday about 2013 in 2014 if each were GIF-laden, tongue-in-cheek, and generally full of mirth.

b
12 years ago

“Two, Arizona and Florida get to have people want to go there on purpose. ”

What?

ryarriz
12 years ago
Reply to  b

yeah i reread that one a couple times, too. not really oozing with sarcasm, but it’s gotta be, right? regardless, the article was a very enjoyable read.

me
12 years ago

I would like to see some lousy projections for bunt doubles in 2014.

Subversive
12 years ago

Brilliant! Every time I read the bit where the Rays players identify that it’s a baseball I start laughing. Hold on, I think I’ll scroll up and read it again…. Annnd, now I have tears in my eyes again. My goodness, brilliant.

Jon L.
12 years ago

I’m thinking a speedy, aggressive deadball-era left-handed hitter might’ve racked up some bunt doubles in his day – say, Ty Cobb, or a lesser player with a similar skillset. Any way to look into this?

Also, this may have been the funniest article I’ve read on Fangraphs.

losealot
12 years ago

have we ever had a bunt triple?

Schuxu
12 years ago

A couple of questions came to mind:
– How would a shifting defense react if a player would call his upcoming bunt? – How would they react if you show bunt way early, so early that you would have enough time to pull back and hit normally?
– What would be the avg. of a hitter who tried to bunt every time he comes up with a big shift on him?
– How long would it take until a defense stops shifting / adjusts the shift for aforementioned batter?

I really wish batter would ditch their stubbornness and start bunting much more against the shift.

Orondo Slim
12 years ago

Jeff, how often do we see a 1-5-4-3 double play like the Mariners pulled off a couple of seasons ago? I’ve been wondering about that ever since it happened.