Rockies Retain Story, Troubled Narrative

Last February, shortly after the Colorado Rockies agreed to pay Nolan Arenado $260 million to play baseball in Denver through the 2026 season, USA Today’s Bob Nightengale quoted the team’s franchise player as saying “I grew up here in this organization, so it feels like home in a way. I’ve been here since the tide has changed, and that’s a really good feeling.” The meta-story of that signing was that the Rockies had convinced Arenado that they were finally serious about building a contender around him, and it was that assurance (plus, of course, the $260 million) that convinced their generational star to sign his name on the dotted line.

We’re not even a year into that deal, and things have soured at Coors Field. The Rockies finished 2019 71-91, fourth in a soft-besides-the-Dodgers NL West, and until last week, their biggest offseason deal was signing Chris Owings to a minor-league contract. That by itself would probably be enough to alienate Arenado, but a reportedly disastrous offseason meeting between the Rockies star and GM Jeff Bridich led to a public rift that has yet to fully resolve itself. Bridich declined to answer media questions about the Arenado situation (or any other subject) at the team’s Fan Fest last week, and although Arenado worked to tamp down the public aspect of the story last week, it’s clear things aren’t over.

It’s in this context that the Rockies reportedly signed their 26-year-old shortstop Trevor Story to a two-year, $27.5 million deal last Friday, per Mark Feinsand and Jon Morosi. The deal covers Story’s two remaining arbitration years but leaves his upcoming free agency unchanged; he’ll next hit the market at 29. In that sense, the deal differs from Scott Oberg’s three-year deal-plus-an-option, signed in December, and to an even greater extent from the five-year deal they signed with German Márquez last spring (that deal bought out either one or two years of Márquez’s free agency, depending on whether the Rockies exercise a club option). In this case, Story is under no obligation to stick around.

In Story’s case, cost certainty for Colorado comes at the expense of about $2 million in 2020 salary — he had filed for arbitration at $11.5 million, with the Rockies countering at $10.75 million — but the real benefit to Colorado is in the potential 2021 savings. Story will now play that season for $13.75 million at age 28. If he reaches 5 WAR in 2020, as he has in each of the last two season, he’ll be one of only a very small handful of players to do so (only 15 players reached 5.0 WAR in both 2018 and 2019) and one of at most five sometime shortstops (Alex Bregman, Francisco Lindor, Xander Bogaerts, and Marcus Semien are the other candidates to reach this milestone).

$13.75 million for that kind of performance in 2021 — or, frankly, even the 3.9 WAR Steamer projects him for in 2020 — is a steal at twice the price. Craig Edwards estimated the price of a win in free agency at something like $9.1 million in 2020, which puts the price of a 3.9 WAR season next year at something like $35.5 million. Adjusting upwards to account for nonlinearity and the increased price of a win in 2021 makes Story’s new salary for that year look even better from the Rockies’ perspective. As for Story, he’s bought himself downside insurance against the possibility of a catastrophic injury or underperformance in the next two years and still retained the right to cash in on his upside should he enter free agency in fall 2021 on the trajectory he appears to be on right now.

And let’s be clear: It’s an impressive trajectory. Among shortstops, Story is the fastest in major league history to reach 100 home runs (by games played). He’s reached 650 plate appearances in each of his last two seasons and 550 in his last three. Even as the league-wide strikeout rate has continued to rise, Story has brought his strikeout rate — which sat in the low- to mid-30s for his first two seasons — down to the mid-20s, all while maintaining walk and contact rates around 8% and 75%, respectively. In 2019, he recorded a positive run value against every single pitch type after struggling against offspeed stuff as recently as 2017. The ridiculously deep shortstop class obscures it to some extent, but Story is an excellent all-around player — one of the top 30 or so in the game — and this deal is for less than he deserves.

But this is what baseball’s current economic system does to players. If Story was free to negotiate with other teams now, he’d be signing a deal much longer than two years (or, more likely, would have already done so). That’s what the market could bear. But because he can’t negotiate freely for another two years, and because he’s never had the big payday that’ll completely secure his financial future, he’s had to accept a deal that will almost certainly underpay him for his performance for the next two years. Signing this deal is better for Story than not signing this deal, to be sure, but worse than what he could have achieved under a less restrictive labor regime.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

Which brings us back to the bad feelings discussed at the top of the piece. Story’s contract is unusual among extensions signed by shortstops with four years or less of service time in the last three years in that it does not buy out any free agent years and does lock in a relatively high AAV. Jorge Polanco, Ketel Marte, Paul DeJong, and Tim Anderson all signed for at least five years (six, for DeJong and Anderson) for a mean of about $4.6 million a year. That’s a reflection of their relatively short service times — less than 2.1 years in all cases. But even Jean Segura and Bogaerts, who both signed extensions between years four and six, signed deals of five and six years, respectively. There just isn’t an analogue for a shortstop in Story’s position signing for a relatively high AAV for no free agent years. To me, it reads like Story and the Rockies finalizing the details of the last two years of their time together.

So, as with so many things, let’s see what happens next. As Craig noted earlier this month, trading Arenado would have been a tricky proposition even without all the recent nastiness that’s emerged around the subject. Whether the Rockies choose to do so will have an awful lot to do with how this Colorado team — which seemed so promising just a few years ago, and could still be — looks after 2021, when Story will have a chance to come back to the negotiating table. For now, he’s guaranteed himself $27.5 million, which is no small feat given his limited leverage, and can come into the next two seasons without having to worry about his contract.





Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BobbyJohn69
6 years ago

So potentially, Story and Arenado (opt-out) could be gone at the end of 2021.

Maybe Bridich tried to get Story to sign for more years and Trevor declined, but it sure seems like having at least one of those guys solidly in the fold for the next handful of seasons would be a grand idea, especially with the Desmond contract and all the bullpen dollars coming off the books in ’21 (or ’20).

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

Not sure why you have downvotes. I imagine they did entertain a long-term deal but couldn’t agree. Maybe COL is happy to settle for minimal payroll after Arenado opts out and just rolling around in cash – this is increasingly how organizations are run.

BobbyJohn69
6 years ago
Reply to  RonnieDobbs

Didn’t check in for a bit, so never saw the down votes.

It really feels like the Rockies are betting on Arenado surveying the free agent market in the 2021 off-season as a guy on the verge of turning 31, weighing his chances as opposed to the remaining 5/165 he would have left on this deal , and opting for the latter.

fjtorres
6 years ago

Sounds like Colorado expects Arenado to opt out at which point they’ll do a full teardown/rebuild. So trying to keep Story at a high price wouldn’t buy them much.
(Plus all the money going to Desmond and the gas can bullpen is hurting them.)
When is the GM’s contract up?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
6 years ago

The Rockies are a cautionary tale of wanting your team to spend more money, no matter if it seems like a “smart” buy. They did, and now they’re crying poor, and while I expect both the Reds and White Sox and all those other teams to get a lot more bang for their buck than the Rockies did (because how could they not?!?) we’re going to be flipping out at these other teams for not spending to get over the hump in a couple of years.

Because really, what the Rockies *should* be doing now is either trading guys before they have to to kick-start the rebuild or pushing all their chips in now before Story and Arenado and Jon Gray leave in 2021. But they’re claiming they’re tapped out, and they don’t want to admit to a rebuild yet, so there’s not a lot left except to play out the string, and then trade a whole bunch of guys at the deadline in 2021, and praying German Marquez and Brendan Rodgers are enough to keep the team from being Marlins-level bad.

Good times!

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Lots of teams did not spend money and are still not spending money or competing. At least COL tried to field a competitive team and has been on the fringe of contention several times. They never put a product on the field that was not fun to watch. Those model teams likely won’t get much further than COL did. Who cares about value other than ownership groups? All MLB teams are drowning in unspent money. Its weird to completely discredit their success. In reality COL is probably the toughest place to field a contender… meh, details.

BobbyJohn69
6 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The signing of Ian Desmond did so much collateral damage. SO much.

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

The bullpen investment didn’t help.
Shaw in particular was a disaster waiting to happen.
Francona really squeezed him and Allen dry.

BobbyJohn69
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Totally agree.

The thing with Desmond just had so many ripple effects:

Forced a position change for Ryan McMahon from 1B to 2B (since Desmond was slated for 1B), which wound up costing him development time and also resulted in DJ LeMahieu leaving in free agency.

Desmond’s contract, coupled with the bullpen economic gaffes, also led to Ottovino leaving. (He and DJ could have both been retained for essentially the cost of Desmond, if not a hair less).

Once Desmond finally proved he wasn’t cutting it at 1B, he was moved back to CF. This blocked Mike Tauchman, who never got a real shot at the MLB level and also went to the Yankees where he tore it up, albeit in limited action.

Desmond moving to CF prompted them to sign Daniel Murphy to play 1B, keeping McMahon at 2B (and blocking Brendan Rodgers in the process, and/or pushing him and McMahon into a time share arrangement).

I said it was a disaster at the time, and I was even more correct than I could have imagined, unfortunately.

WebsMember since 2020
6 years ago

“…because he’s never had the big payday that’ll completely secure his financial future…”

I think you meant:

“…because he’s never had the big payday that’ll completely secure his grandkids’ financial future…”

He’s already made $7.5 million and now adds $27.5 million to that. His financial future is already secure, even after taxes.

RonnieDobbs
6 years ago

It sounds like a smart deal to me. Let some other team shell out the long-term ugly contract. Arenado will just have to settle for his quarter billion dollars.

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago

The Rockies should absolutely be going in on a guy like Puig. Even if we don’t assume a big jump in offense from playing in Coors, he seems like he might be fairly cheap and Colorado’s outfield is awful right now. Are we to expect that 2/$25 wouldn’t get it done?

BobbyJohn69
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I think the outfield is pretty set with (left to right) Dahl, Desmond (ugh), and Blackmon.

Not sure where Puig fits in that mix?

dl80Member since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  BobbyJohn69

With someone in center other than Desmond. I’m also not a believer in Dahl.

BobbyJohn69
6 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I wish they would recognize Desmond as a sunk cost and move on.

Dahl’s injuries have been on the fluky variety, from what I can tell, and he has been really good when healthy. I think he is a key piece moving forward.

That said, Puig can’t play CF, neither can Charlie, and Dahl is marginal there.

tung_twista
6 years ago

I don’t know if I like the calculus from the Rockies’ side.
Comparing Story’s extension to what he could have gotten in free agency and saying it is a steal for the Rockies is not very meaningful.
You should compare it to what he would have gotten in arbitration.

Assuming everything goes reasonably well for Story, he would have won the arbitration case and received $11.5M in 2020 and receive ~$16.5M next year.
(Bryant received $12.9M in 2019 as ARB 2 and will receive $18.6M in 2020 after putting up a 4.8 war season. I used the same 44% increase)
That is merely $0.5M more than what the Rockies guaranteed story.
You can quibble with the math, but the bottom line is Rockies are saving at most a couple million from the median outcome.
Of course, if you can save half a million, you should.
But for that, they are underwriting an insurance for Story in case he gets injured which could cost the team ~$15M.
I don’t think that is a risk worth taking for the Rockies.

fjtorres
6 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

The contract does make him a good trade target if the team implodes.

Mean Mr. Mustard
6 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

This particular comment deserves a lot more upvotes, although we are talking about the Rockies, so they either wouldn’t trade him or they’d get less than they give up.

fjtorres
6 years ago

They could try dealing with a competitive team known to overpay.
The Mets look like a good fit.

Careless
6 years ago

These articles that pretend that FAs would get paid just as much as they do now if pre-arb and arb players weren’t cheap are really weird. Do the authors not understand what’s wrong with them?

Mean Mr. Mustard
6 years ago

Personally, I don’t feel as if he needed to sign this deal at all to be considered financially secure, even as a major league baseball player. The Rockies filing his arbitration at $10+ million had him secure regardless.

I can’t think that he wouldn’t have been able to float on 10 mill for a year, betting on another star-level season to boost his next arbitration case. He’d have had more leverage over the team while still having been able to cash in, albeit for slightly less in year one. And if he got hurt bad enough to end his career, knock wood that he doesn’t, he’d still have banked seven figures plus insurance compensation.

I realize that I probably don’t think like him, or a lot of people for that matter, but if I were in his position I’d bet on myself over an extra year of security.