Sabathia’s Opt-Out Prospects

CC Sabathia fronted a surprisingly effective Yankees rotation that helped the Bronx Bombers win a league-best 97 games. He threw 237.1 innings of top-notch baseball, tallying 7.1 WAR and improving virtually every aspect of his game. It’s even arguable that he pitched on par with Justin Verlander.

Once normalizing adjustments are made to their successes on balls in play, the gap shrinks substantially. At worst, he was second best. This was Sabathia’s best season since 2008 — when he tore the National League apart with the Brewers — and the fantastic numbers could not have come at a more opportune time. Despite his tremendous contract, Sabathia may choose to exercise his opt-out clause after the season and hit the free agent market.

When the Yankees signed Sabathia to a 7-yr, $161 million contract, the team further enticed the big man with such perks as: a no trade clause, semimonthly payments over the entire calendar year (not just the season) and suites on road trips. Perhaps the most enticing aspect of their offer, however, was the ability to opt out after three years.

Such clauses feel more player-friendly than beneficial to the team, because they enable a player performing well, already signed to a lucrative deal, to cash in even more. Further, it prevents the team from sustaining its surplus value on the contract if the player outperforms the deal.

Opting out certainly carries risk. If the market has a dearth of suitors and none are enthralled with the idea of throwing gobs of money at a single player, he who has opted out may end up signing for less than the remaining portion of the original contract. With Sabathia, the choice boils down to whether he thinks he can find a better deal than the 4-yr/$92 million remaining on his Yankees contract. If there are strong indications a better deal can be had, Sabathia will likely opt out, but he won’t exactly be able to fall back on the 4-yr/$92 million left if all else falls through.

For Sabathia, the market is plentiful. Aside from the less expensive C.J. Wilson, no ace pitchers are set to hit the market. Sabathia would vault to the top of shopping lists upon opting out. Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe has already speculated that the Red Sox, Angels, Dodgers, Tigers and Giants would show instant interest. It seems plausible that the Cubs could join the sweepstakes.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Even lower-payrolled up-and-comers like the Blue Jays and Nationals could attempt to woo Sabathia in an attempt to make a ginormous splash.

Sabathia will draw interest if he opts out. Though the acronym TINSTAAPP — there is no such thing as a pitching prospect — is primarily derived from the attrition rates and injury potential of pitchers, Sabathia has been incredibly durable throughout his career. His frame may cause some concern, especially heading into his late-30s, but he just turned 30 years old and has made 30 or more starts in every season of his 11-year career except 2006, when he started 28 games. His training regimen and pitching mechanics seem capable of supporting his large frame. Sure, he could “break” at any given moment, but nothing in his career should lead to skepticism that he can stay on the mound.

From 2006-on, Sabathia has not tallied less than 5 WAR in a season. He ranks second in baseball in cumulative pitcher WAR throughout that span, trailing Roy Halladay. And really, the 2-WAR difference (40.9 for Doc, 38.9 for CC) is minuscule. A larger gap exists between Sabathia, Dan Haren and Verlander — the latter pair is tied at 32.3. His prime may soon be over, but Sabathia has shown no signs of slowing down. While a 4-yr/$92 million contract would benefit the Yankees, or any other team for that matter, the mechanics of his contract allow him to sign another monster seven year deal.

Given the typical cost of a win, now and into the future, an expected decline of approximately a half-win per season, and the potential for inflation, Sabathia projects out to approximately $175-$185 million over a seven year contract. What makes the situation more interesting is that this isn’t shaping up to mirror Alex Rodriguez’s re-negotiations either, where the Centaur basically had one true bidder: the Yankees.

It’s easy to conflate opting out with losing desire to play for a specific team, but that isn’t always the case. Sabathia may very well want to continue pitching for the Yankees, but under terms more commensurate with his performance. The Yankees aren’t likely to let their ace leave over lack of effort, but if he decides to opt out, don’t be shocked if he has numerous lucrative offers to consider. He’s that good, and that valuable, and appears capable of star-level performance for another half-decade.





Eric is an accountant and statistical analyst from Philadelphia. He also covers the Phillies at Phillies Nation and can be found here on Twitter.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Slappy Gilmore
14 years ago

Why is it that CC has a 7.1 WAR and Hamels 4.9 when they have identical FIP’s ? Hamles has the better K/BB ratio and better GB % as well.

Nick V
14 years ago
Reply to  Slappy Gilmore

Better competition, more innings. Think David Ortiz vs. Ricky Nolasco…

ecp
14 years ago
Reply to  Nick V

How can one really compare David Ortiz to Ricky Nolasco?

Nick V
14 years ago
Reply to  Nick V

David Ortiz is a DH, Ricky Nolasco is a pitcher. Both are hitters.

ethan
14 years ago
Reply to  Nick V

your gay

jim
14 years ago
Reply to  Slappy Gilmore

they had the same xFIP, not FIP. xFIP is not used in the fWAR calculation. but yeah, even if they had the same FIP, the AL east > NL east, and he threw 20 more innings

Ableem
14 years ago
Reply to  jim

So WAR is division-adjusted? I didn’t think it was.

jim
14 years ago
Reply to  jim

FIP is league adjusted, and therefore WAR is as well. it may not be division adjusted, but it’s still worth noting that sabathia faced tougher opponents than hamels did on a regular basis. mind you i’m only coming to that conclusion by eyeballing game logs, if someone were to determine opponent wOBA for the two it would reveal whether that point were true or not.

Slartibartfast
14 years ago
Reply to  jim

Lot of half wrong information in this thread….

– FIP is NOT adjusted for anything. FIP is a simple formula based simply on the three true outcomes: K/BB/HR

(13*HR+3*BB-2*K)/IP + a constant which is derivative of the run environment

– WAR is adjusted for park and league, but NOT for individual opponents on a player per player basis.

IE, Sabathia gets an adjustment for pitching in Yankee Stadium for half his games, and for pitching against superior AL hitters as a whole, but NOT for specifically facing the Red Sox, Jacoby/AGone/Papi etc X times a year.

jim
14 years ago
Reply to  jim

@slart

“FIP is NOT adjusted for anything. FIP is a simple formula based simply on the three true outcomes: K/BB/HR

(13*HR+3*BB-2*K)/IP + *a constant which is derivative of the run environment*”

(emphasis added)

right, a constant which is adjusted to scale the average FIP to the average ERA in each league.

http://www.fangraphs.com/library/index.php/pitching/fip/

NoneOfYourBusiness
14 years ago
Reply to  Slappy Gilmore

Because CC pitches in the AL and Hamels pitches in the NL. CC has tougher lineups to face then Cole that’s why.

Cidron
14 years ago

yeah, Cole doesnt have to face the Phillies bats (save for when it doesnt count)

brian
14 years ago

I always thought that the opt-out clause in this particular case benefitted the Yankees. If CC opts out the Yankees will have gotten 3 excellent from him and not have to worry about paying him into his mid 30s. I assume he will opt out and the Yankees will re-sign him but the opt-out removes some risk from having to committ 7 guaranteed years to a pitcher who has few past comparables due to his unique build.

Nick V
14 years ago
Reply to  brian

I don’t think I agree that this opt out clause is good for the Yankees. One thing unconsidered is the risk that he loses effectiveness, is consistently injured etc., in which case he would not have opted out.

That said, I expect the Yankees will include another opt out clause in his next contract (which I think will be about the exact same contract he got last time) and won’t be too upset if, at age 34, he decides to opt out. There’s a big difference between opting out at 30 and 34.

Sultan of Schwwingg
14 years ago
Reply to  Nick V

Depends on if CC opts out or not. If he does, ala ARod, the Yankees could be smart and say ‘see ya’ (thanks for three of your best years). Or they could be less smart, resign him for more dollars and have another albatross contract on their hands.

Ryan
14 years ago
Reply to  brian

If the Yankees resign him, it won’t be for less than 4 years or for less money, so I’m not sure how it will be a benefit in this case.

Nathan
14 years ago
Reply to  brian

That doesn’t make sense. Your implicit assumption is he wouldn’t get any more than a 4 year contract offer (forget the dollar amounts for the moment) from any team if he were to opt out now.

In reality, if he opts out, some team will without a doubt give him at least a 4 year deal worth more dollars than what was remaining on the deal he opted out of. And since there will be a ton of interest in him, you can be pretty darn certain he the competition in the market will likely boil down to who will give the most years more so than who will give him the largest yearly salary.

If anything, the Yankees probably benefit from him passing on his option to opt out, because if he does take the option to end the contract, the only feasible way they retain him is to give him a contract that runs till he’s in his late 30s instead of what could’ve otherwise been his mid 30s.

Native Angeleno
14 years ago
Reply to  brian

Sabathia wants to (1) play on the West Coast, where he and his extended family live (2) play on an NL team, because he’s stated more than once he likes to hit and prefers NL play, with the other pitcher coming to bat, too. He isn’t in this only for the money; the pot was sweetened by the Yanks to include the moon. HE insisted on the 3-yr opt-out clause, not them. He may have had enough of a city that smells in the summer like an open urinal. And, of course, the other factors above.

jim
14 years ago

man, if he leaves the yankees, they’re pretty much screwed rotation-wise next year, unless they do something ridiculous like sign jackson and wilson

Slartibartfast
14 years ago
Reply to  jim

This is the real issue at hand. The Yankees MUST resign CC. It would be total mayhem if they didn’t. Cashman better warm up his signing hand.

Unless… they have a clone of Clemens they have waiting to deploy.

William
14 years ago
Reply to  Slartibartfast

Pettitte?

/icandream

Barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  Slartibartfast

Because of this I’d say he would be a fool not to opt out, even if he only wants to play in New York again.

Unlike Jeter, he can get bids from other teams and it will work in his favor.

I’ve always hoped he would become an NL pitcher anyways because he is so good at batting.

Bill
14 years ago
Reply to  jim

Boras would have the Yankees over a barrel if Sabathia ops out. They need a pitcher of Sabathia’s quality. They can’t count on Nova, Garcia, and Colon to repeat their performances. If he ops out and the Yankees are his only suitor, Cashman will still be in a very poor bargaining position. If Cashman refuses to give into C.C.’s demands, Sabathia can sign a bloated one year deal with someone and wait for Cashman to come back in 2012 with his hat in his hand and a .500 record. I think he’ll opt out and get a $5 million a year raise over the duration of the contract.

Nathan
14 years ago
Reply to  Bill

CC would be insane to take a bloated one year deal. With guaranteed contracts, and with the somewhat misguided mindset it seems most GMs have (pay players for what they’ve done, not what they will do), a one year deal would put him at a huge risk if he A) pitches worse than previous seasons or B) gets hurt.

In other words, what’s more? 1 * $30 million or 7 * 10 million? Not that those would be the real numbers, but you get the idea…

TK
14 years ago

The opt out hurts the Yankees. Anyone who disagrees needs a refresher course in arithmetic.

On the other hand, thanks to their gobs of money, the Yankees will end up signing him again, probably to a similar deal (i would guess 6/156), but perhaps without the opt out.

Eric R
14 years ago
Reply to  TK

Well, projecting 2012 as (3×2011+2×2010+1×2009)/6-0.5 WAR and -0.5 WAR per year for aging. And figuring $5M/WAR in 2012, plus 6.5% inflation afterward, I get a 7 year $180M deal, which is right in the middle of what was mentioned in the article.

Looking at just the first four years it comes out as $112M in value, so if he’d accept that, then it’ll cost the Yankees an extra $20M if he opts out vs not. And that ignores the likelihood that he’ll want more than four years and every year tacked on just increases the chances of an albatross contract.

FYI- even with 0% inflation [all everything else left alone], the next four years will still be worth $102M.

Or, to get down to 4/$92M, you’d have to figure -1 WAR per year in decline rather than just a half a win [with all else left alone].

Barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  Eric R

0.5 WAR is for position players (right?) shouldn’t it be larger for starting pitchers where injuries are just part of the game.

Red Sox Talk
14 years ago

Sabathia is as close to a sure thing as there is when it comes to 30-year old free agent pitchers.. of course the Sox thought along the same lines concerning John Lackey when they signed him.

My point is not that CC will implode, but that you just never know with older pitchers. The Yanks might be better off signing the cheaper C.J. Wilson and improving the depth of their rotation. Can they rely on Colon and Garcia until Betances and Banuelos are ready? If I were Cashman, I wouldn’t.

Barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  Red Sox Talk

What do you mean, Lackey is even more of a sure thing than CC, just in the wrong direction.

Ace
14 years ago

CC twitted over the weekend I Love NYC, wait til the price isn’t right.

He also said earlier this year, before his agent and the players Association told him to shhh, he wasn’t opting out.

CC’s new deal should have a weight limit attached for when he reports and during the season, he looks like 30-40 lbs heavier.

When the cameras pans the dugout, he’s always shewing on something.

Ace
14 years ago

~meant chewing not shewiing ~

CC twitted over the weekend I Love NYC, wait til the price isn’t right.

He also said earlier this year, before his agent and the players Association told him to shhh, he wasn’t opting out.

CC’s new deal should have a weight limit attached for when he reports and during the season, he looks like 30-40 lbs heavier.

When the cameras pans the dugout, he’s always chewing on something.

notsellingjeans
14 years ago

I think he will sign in the NL, recognizing it will help his legacy, just as it has helped the legacies of Cliff Lee and Halladay. Much like Lee and Halladay, Sabathia has Hall of Fame chances, and guys with that legacy on the line are at least considering the thought that their E.R.A. will be lower, their strikeouts higher, and their win totals higher if they sign with a good NL team, rather than competing in the AL East.

Hall of Fame voters don’t make league adjustments. They see 250 stikeout seasons, 20-win seasons, and ERA’s under 3.50. Sabathia will sign with either his hometown SF Giants, or the Phillies.

In either case the Yankees would end up with the No. ~25-31 AND the No. ~33 overall pick. Then I think they’d at least attempt to sign C.J. Wilson and try to trade Jesus Montero for Gio Gonzalez.

notsellingjeans
14 years ago

I also think the above scenario might be the ideal way for it to play out from the Yankees’ perspective. Signing Wilson keeps him away from an AL rival, and Sabathia’s signing in the NL has zero impact upon the Yankees’ playoff chances.

Obviously it would be far more damaging if Sabathia were to sign with the Red Sox…but that would push the Red Sox into $200M territory. I don’t see it.

Antonio bananas
14 years ago

I wouldn’t be surprised if Philly chucks some money at him. They seem to be hell bent on having a roster of guys in their mid 30s getting paid around 20M a year. I hope they do honestly.

Marc
14 years ago

4 years @92 million isn’t enough. If you want out go sign somewhere else. You don’t exactly show a whole lot come playoff time as of late. We have several kids on the farm and that extra cash could get us some needed depth. Anybody who walks away from that much money isn’t worth having because he doesn’t really want to be there.

Charles Bennett
14 years ago

C.C.? No way! Go after C.J. Wilson instead! Or better, use that money to give Kemp and Kershaw fat contracts

Paul
14 years ago

I enjoyed the article except for the comparision between CC and Verlander where strangely it’s CC, then “a large gap’ to Verlander/Haren

Why does the author compare CC and Verlander from 2006 onwards?

It is 6 years ago, and for the record Verlander > CC over the last 3 years according to fWar, which would be a better measure that is a) more relevant for their respective performance levels going forward (which is what the CC opt-out versus next contract is all about), and b) comensurate with CC’s tenure in NY contract wise.

Taking 2006 as the starting point is a bit unfair as Verlander is younger and effectively started his MLB career in 2006 so the 2006 onwards includes Verlander’s ‘learning phase’ at the MLB level (which was still pretty good) while it pretty much sweet-spots CC’s peak.

For example taking their 1st 6 proper MLB years you get Verlander (32.4 fWAR) > CC (23.4 fWAR 2001-2006), or taking their last 3 yrs Verlander (21.7) > CC (18.7)

The writers here seem to have taken against Verlander, who will soon be a CY Winner with a triple crown. Just give the guy his dues. So what if the mainstream media are superjizzing themselves about Verlander. It is ok for a player to be feted for different reasons (7 fWAR ‘higher in rWAR’ is great, and winning 12 on the bounce and nearly getting 25 is also great for ‘media story-wise’).

I think its much fairer to just say that CC and Verlander are on the same plane, both on a very small list of proper aces well on a HoF track

Fangraphs does really well in pointing out underappreciated aspects of the game and how they are valuable too, but I think it tries a bit hard to take the contrary approach in knocking down great players too (Verlander 2011 at 24-5 is knocked here; same stats but 12-17 he would be championed).

Good luck to CC and his soon-to-be newer fatter contract, he has earned it, and I hope that CC (and Verlander) can keep their performances up as both seem well on the HoF path

ballparkprints
14 years ago

CC on the Yankees great! However if he’s not happy let him go. Today in MLB outside of the Yankees Tigers and Nationals I don’t think too many teams can afford to pay 165 million.
I also don’t think Fielder or Pujols will receive better offers then they have already from their current teams….

T.O. Chris
14 years ago

@ballparkprints

If you don’t think Prince will get more than the 5 year 105 million dollar extension they offered him, you don’t know baseball GMs. Someone will give him 6 or 7 years. The Nats payed Werth more than that, and Fielder is a much better player than Werth.