San Diego Padres Top 39 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the San Diego Padres. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the third year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but I use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson Merrill | 20.2 | A+ | SS | 2025 | 60 |
| 2 | Ethan Salas | 17.1 | A | C | 2026 | 55 |
| 3 | Dylan Lesko | 19.8 | R | SP | 2026 | 55 |
| 4 | Jairo Iriarte | 21.6 | A+ | SP | 2024 | 45+ |
| 5 | Nathan Martorella | 22.4 | A+ | 1B | 2026 | 45 |
| 6 | Robby Snelling | 19.5 | A+ | SP | 2027 | 40+ |
| 7 | Adam Mazur | 22.2 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40+ |
| 8 | Samuel Zavala | 19.0 | A | RF | 2026 | 40+ |
| 9 | Brandon Valenzuela | 22.8 | AA | C | 2024 | 40+ |
| 10 | Estuar Suero | 17.8 | R | CF | 2028 | 40+ |
| 11 | Jackson Wolf | 24.2 | AA | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 12 | Korry Howell | 24.8 | AA | CF | 2024 | 40 |
| 13 | Henry Williams | 21.8 | A | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 14 | Noel Vela | 24.5 | AA | SP | 2025 | 40 |
| 15 | Jagger Haynes | 20.8 | A | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 16 | Brett Sullivan | 29.4 | MLB | C | 2023 | 40 |
| 17 | Eguy Rosario | 23.9 | MLB | 3B | 2024 | 40 |
| 18 | Graham Pauley | 22.8 | A+ | 3B | 2026 | 40 |
| 19 | Brent Honeywell | 28.3 | MLB | MIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 20 | Ryan Bergert | 23.3 | A+ | SIRP | 2025 | 40 |
| 21 | Tom Cosgrove | 26.1 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 22 | Alek Jacob | 25.1 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 40 |
| 23 | Victor Lizarraga | 19.6 | A+ | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 24 | Juan Zabala | 24.0 | AAA | C | 2026 | 35+ |
| 25 | Isaiah Lowe | 20.2 | A | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 26 | Tirso Ornelas | 23.3 | AAA | LF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 27 | Marcos Castañon | 24.3 | A+ | 3B | 2026 | 35+ |
| 28 | Rosman Verdugo | 18.4 | A | SS | 2027 | 35+ |
| 29 | Jakob Marsee | 22.0 | A+ | CF | 2026 | 35+ |
| 30 | Cole Paplham | 23.3 | A | SIRP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 31 | Kevin Hacen | 17.4 | R | 3B | 2028 | 35+ |
| 32 | Pedro Avila | 26.5 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 33 | Efrain Contreras | 23.5 | AA | SP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 34 | Ray Kerr | 28.8 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 35 | Jay Groome | 24.9 | AAA | SP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 36 | Luis German | 21.7 | R | SIRP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 37 | Bradgley Rodriguez | 19.6 | R | SIRP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 38 | Kevin Kopps | 26.3 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 39 | Garrett Hawkins | 23.4 | A+ | SP | 2025 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Catching Depth
Oswaldo Linares, C
Lamar King Jr., C
Juan Fernandez, C
Yoiber Ocopio, C
Oliver Carrillo, C
Linares, 20, was a two-year DSL guy who was sent to Lake Elsinore not long after the Complex League season started. He looked very good during extended spring training, showing feel for the barrel and a passable look behind the dish. He has 40-grade bat speed but is otherwise a pretty well-rounded young catcher. King, whose dad played defensive end for the Seahawks, was a $500,000 high school signee in 2022. He’s extremely physical and has gotten much better on defense during the last year, but he is still a long-term dev project in basically every way. Fernandez, 24, is a multi-positional player with a long bat-to-ball track record. He’s not great at any of the positions he plays (C/1B/3B, a bit of second base last year). Ocopio is a big-framed DSL catcher with a strong early-career bat-to-ball performance. Carrillo is a more mature catcher who is crushing the DSL right now and needs to be sent to Arizona to be tested.
FanGraphs’ Flavor
Alain Camou, 2B
Ismael Javier, MIF
Emil Turbi, MIF
Luis De Leon, MIF
This entire group is comprised of undersized middle infielders, many of whom switch-hit, and all of whom have advanced feel for contact. They are also all quite small. Camou is on the complex in Arizona while the rest are in the DSL.
You Might Be Interested in Knowing About…
Nerwilian Cedeño, 2B
Yendry Rojas, SS
Daniel Montesino, LF
Joshua Mears, LF
Especially if you already care about Padres prospects, you might be wondering about some of the names from this group. Cedeño is a little infielder with sneaky pop for his size. I fear he’s a second base-only defender without enough hit tool to profile as an everyday guy. Unless they can play another position, guys like this tend to end up on Domingo Leyba’s path. The same is largely true of Rojas, who signed for $1.3 million in 2022. I’m not sure he is going to stay on the dirt. For him, Montesino and Mears, the offensive bar they’ll need to clear is quite high.
Inventory Arms
Bodi Rascon, LHP
Jose Espada, RHP
Matt Waldron, RHP
Kobe Robinson, RHP
Carter Loewen, RHP
Rascon is a 6-foot-5 lefty with a low-90s fastball, an average slider, and a changeup that flashes. He could be a durable spot starter. A 2019 minor league rule 5 pick by Boston (from Toronto), Espada was signed as a minor league free agent in the offseason. He has a vertical fastball/curveball split and some of his breakers are really nasty. His changeup can miss a bat, too. None of his pitches have consistent finish, which makes Espada’s fastball especially vulnerable at 40-grade velo. Waldron is a knuckleballing depth arm who made his big league debut recently. Robinson is a low-slot righty sitting 94. Loewen is sitting 95 and has an 87 mph slider; he was promoted to Fort Wayne at the end of June. He’s a potential reliever who’s a great distance from Petco.
System Overview
The Padres system is extremely top heavy, with a four-player tier of potential stars up top and then a sizable drop off soon after. The Padres’ deadline posture as big time buyers each of the last several years has definitely cost them good prospects as they’ve aggressively pursued a ring, which is as good a reason to have a slightly depleted farm system as any. The Padres have tended to keep their system flush with enough premium prospects to sustain this approach. They aren’t perfect, but they tend to pick and sign really good players. Last year, I wrote that their system was down compared to prior years and they were still able to trade for Juan Soto. At times, the Padres are a little over-aggressive on the trade market and it ends up costing them the occasional Matt Brash or Emmanuel Clase type of player in a smaller deal. The sheer number of graduated big leaguers in other orgs who were originally signed by the Padres proves both points. There are currently 15 prospects in other systems who were originally signed by San Diego. On average since 2020, seven players originally signed by the Padres have played enough big league baseball to lose rookie status, including Brash, Clase, Jack Suwinski, Andrés Muñoz, and David Bednar.
San Diego is happy to draft pitchers who fall solely due to injury, with Dylan Lesko and Henry Williams the most recent examples; Cal Quantrill and Mason Thompson can be described this way too. As always, on-mound demeanor and worn-on-the-sleeve competitiveness seem to be separators for the Padres, though no amount of chest-pounding will help some of these guys’ fastballs play. On the position player side, a little pod of compact, hitterish infielders has popped up at San Diego’s lowest levels. This is a prospect phylum I tend to associate more with teams that take an analytically-oriented approach in the international market, like Cleveland and Milwaukee. I don’t think I’d call this a trend yet, and it may just be the sort of player they pivoted to in order to fill out a signing class behind Ethan Salas.
The Padres pro department still deploys multiple scouts at the complex level even though the team was expected to contend this season and be buyers at the deadline. This is not true of all contenders, some of which take a more dynamic approach and throttle down complex coverage when they’re less likely to trade for prospects. The Braves are a good example of this. In the event they fail to get rolling in July and decide to make some sellers’ deals, the Padres are in position to take players from the lower minors.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
The Padre’s trade deadline should be interesting whether they restock and sell off Soto (almost unthinkable but also, why not?) or buy and go for WC slot instead.
There is no way they are trading Soto. Once the market has been set with Ohtani they’re going to offer him 85% of what he gets to keep him in San Diego forever. This is the Peter Seidler way.
I am less certain about Snell, Wacha, and Martinez, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they keep them too under the same principle.
Why can’t they trade him and still sign him back? That seems like the best play.
Soto’s contract runs through the 2024 season.
Is he really? Why? Didn’t he sign a 1 year deal for 23 mil for just this season to end arbitration?
and he’ll go through arbitration again next season.
One more year of arbitration. So, more accurately, he’s under team control for 2024.
Just half-baked speculation, but if the Angels can justify trading Ohtani to their fans, maybe it can only be for getting someone like Soto in return. And vice versa. If you’re not resigning Soto, and you want to sign Ohtani, . . .
Jay Groome. Whoa, forgot about that dude
& Brent Honeywell! I was getting ready to make a “I look forward to seeing Honeywell on prospect lists until he gets his AARP card in 2045” crack, but, then saw he lost rookie eligibility this year.
Maybe Groome can do that until he’s AARP eligible in 2050.
I like how the Padres traded away half of their minor league system for Juan Soto and they still have 3-4 possible stars waiting around. Just a never-ending flow of talent coming up.
I imagine that the next time the Padres are in buyer mode Jackson Merrill will get traded, since they signed Bogaerts to play there forever. But who knows? Maybe they are planning to field an entire lineup of ex-shortstops and will need Bogaerts to play elsewhere. (I’m also a little skeptical that he is an FV60–probably more like a FV55)
The Clevinger trade was another one where they traded away lots of prospects. Really amazing how many prospects they’ve traded away over the years.
It is a bit of a Dombrowski thing, though – the only trade that really backfired was the Turner one…and he got Tatis back for Shields a year and a half later.
I mean, they’re spending $35M for the back end of their bullpen because they converted Clase, Matt Brash, and Muñoz into absolutely nothing.
Clevinger turned into a pumpkin almost immediately so it’s hard to say that the Padres won the deal–they definitely lost it. But the only guy out of that group who might be a real major leaguer is Josh Naylor. I guess technically Cal Quantrill and Austin Hedges are major leaguers by default, and Quantrill has been better than Clevinger, but neither one has been good themselves either.
Of course…Trent Grisham just flat out isn’t good, and Merrill’s stick will play in CF.
That said: I’m inherently suspicious of guys with middling pop, who made their names by running a massive BABIP in the Cal league – especially when the approach isn’t anything to write home about.
Call it Gary Brown syndrome.
Feel like Howie Kendrick or Lorenzo Cain is a more likely outcome with the bat than Brantley…and that’s a 55 unless a kid has SUPERLATIVE defense and/or baserunning (see: Cain, Lorenzo).
You know, there’s a zone I think Merrill might fall into…
Erick Aybar is actually a near-perfect comp for Merrill’s profile. Almost too perfect.
I don’t see it, Aybar never hit the ball hard. Merrill has very good exit velo metrics, he just has groundballitis
Aybar had a .140 ISO in the minors…and had better numbers through Hi-A, at the same ages, in the same leagues.
Plus, he was a 60 runner.
If Merrill spends 7 years as a 3 WAR/650 starting shortstop, that will be an EXTRAORDINARY outcome.
I won’t disagree if you think Howie Kendrick is a better comp…but that’s a different flavor of the same production, haha.
Grisham is good, he’s completely changed his approach and it’s worked. He’s been somewhat unlucky based on statcast profile but in short he’s far more aggressive now and hits the ball much harder. It has led to more chasing but the trade off has been very much worth it. He’s also still playing a very good defensive CF, idk why his fangraphs metrics there are so poor (negative defense). I wouldn’t at all be surprised if a smart team is able to trade for him on the cheap, hoping preller doesn’t mess this up further
OAA thinks Grisham is above-average in CF. Maybe he’s a little better than above average but even if you think that it’s too light on him they have it correct directionally.
However, DRS and (especially) UZR think his throwing has been terrible. Throwing productivity is pretty inconsistent though.
I expected Grish to benefit from the new shift rule–more than he did.
This may be a dumb question but through this series I’ve seen Eric use a phrase along the lines of “good at getting on top of high fastballs” (here used for Martorella) quite a bit. Is this a synonym because there are only so many ways to say “square up” or “get to” or something similar? Because otherwise isn’t getting on top of a pitch just a recipe for driving it into the ground? If I am being too literal, just downvote me and I will show myself the door.
Yea, I think you’re being too literal
You know all those lines about swinging “down through the ball,” right?
High fastballs are designed to cause whiffs and popups, from people swinging under them.
You need to “get on top of” them in order to square them up.
I guess I will double down on being too literal and say that squaring up a pitch means not swinging under it or getting on top of it. That’s just literally or definitionally true, right?
The other place I hear “get on top of” is former player broadcasters and I wonder if it isn’t something coaches say – ‘get on top of it’ just to get players thinking about not getting under it, and then it just becomes part of their lingo even though it doesn’t mean to them what it literally means.
Honestly, it still baffles me, but thank you for engaging.
Yeah, they’re talking about the physical mechanics of how you need to swing the bat in order to hit a high fastball flush.
Someone with a “grooved” bat path isn’t able to “get on top of” a high fastball, because they can’t adjust in the moment to when the pitch is thrown.
So much jargon!
FWIW, I’ve always thought about “getting on top of high fastballs” as having to do with the hands, rather than the barrel. Hands need to be above the ball in order to square it up, guys who don’t “get on top” have their hands racing low-to-high but never get above plane and either miss or pop up.
Jinx, haha!
Not sure if it’s just me but this article isn’t loading in the FG app – only shows the info about Eric right at the bottom.
Hmm, it isn’t just you – I’m asking about it!
A little surprising to see writeups on two pitchers who may not ever get out of the complex, but not even a mention of Krob, Henry Baez, Castro (for his fastball alone) or Chacon.
I have a hard time believing anyone that just turned 17 should be a 55. Probably Hasn’t even lost his virginity but projecting to be an allstar? Give me a break. Colt Keith is a 50(Probably should be a 60+ now),but no one would trade a 21 year old close to ready 50+ for a just turned 17 year old 55
At the risk of granting this nonsense a proper response, I wonder if losing ones virginity has ever indirectly resulted in a young player’s prospect status getting a boost. A new-found confidence on the field coinciding with a successful courtship.
I don’t have a lot to add here except that if a 17 year old bilingual elite athlete with $5M in the bank is still a virgin it is probably his choice to focus on other things and (at the risk of stating the obvious) it should have no bearing on his scouting report.
Not to mention, his baby soft hands!
Sure, but have you seen the girlfriend?
Apparently, the market for 21-year-old designated hitters is stronger than I thought.
I bet he will be fine at first base, and he is raking. He should probably be a 55, like Casas was going into the season. Of course, Casas isn’t a particularly optimistic comp in terms of actual MLB production and gives you a sense of what happens when a guy at the bottom of the defensive spectrum cools off. So maybe he should stay a 50 anyway.
Hehe. Good joke
For me, I’m not questioning the 55, but I am curious whether Eric has ever put a 55 on a prospect before that just turned 17.
Yes. Kevin Maitan and Vlad Jr. Which should give you a rough approximation of both his floor and ceiling.
That’s really, really interesting. Thanks.
Pretty sure Maitan was a 50 when he debuted, as was Franco when they both debuted in 2018. By the mid-season update, Wander was up to a 60 and Maitan was a 40+ with a down arrow.
I just can’t believe that Salas is doing this in Low-A…and as a catcher.
Genuinely nuts for a 17 year old.
Maitan is listed as 17 years old on the 2017 board and as a 55, but it is worth noting that Eric gives out a lot fewer 55s now than in the past so it’s not directly comparable. I assume part of the reason why is because he’s not giving out 55s to guys like Maitan.
If someone had given me $5 Million when I was 18, I might not have made a full recovery until I was 35.
Did I read that right? Salas was playing Perfect Game events as a middle schooler?
PG takes advantage of, er, creates competitive opportunities for teams starting at 9u.
I thought the Padres made a mistake last year when they traded Robert Hassell III and kept Jackson Merrill, but that’s worked out great. Still, it’s hard to imagine them keeping Jackson Merrill now. The last thing the Padres need is another shortstop (or second baseman), and who else would they trade? I think Seidler was telling the truth the other week when he suggested he’s still a buyer (rather than a seller).
I’m not sure anyone wants Cronenworth, right now, with his new contract and recent performance, and if I understand correctly, Kim is a cash cow due to the Padres’ games being broadcast nationally in South Korea. That’s probably helped alleviate whatever financial pressure from Diamond Sports Group not paying the Padres’ fees anymore. Kim costs less than his salary! So, anyway, my bet would be that Jackson Merrill isn’t in the Padres system after the trade deadline.
Merrill’s timeline is pretty perfectly aligned to Grisham’s remaining team control.
The reason you can never have too many shortstops is that they can play all over the diamond.
Do they still expect to go deep this year? Is Campusano the answer at catcher? Martinez was great at set up last year, but he’s been failing lately. They better hope Suarez can be the set up guy he was when he comes back after the break. If they expect to be in the playoffs this year, trading Jackson Merrill is likely to be a part of the answer to those two questions–this year.
I don’t question any of that, haha – and Merrill is exactly the sort of prospect Preller tends to trade, haha!
He needs to hit .280+ in the Show to be a 3-win guy, and is currently hitting .270 in a hitter friendly A-ball league.
Tatis could shift to CF.
I wouldn’t bet on seeing Salas make the majors in a Padres uniform either. What you can get for Salas on the open market–because of the hype–is probably more in the short term than the risk of developing a barely 17 year-old catcher is worth over the long term. And given a trigger happy Preller?
If Salas makes the majors as a Padre, it will probably be because Preller decides to go with a youth movement and trade someone for more prospects–and that’s hard for me to imagine. Preller is all about high upside in the draft (despite the risk) because he plans on trading them all anyway.
Can someone help me understand why this is wrong?
Because they’re now in a different part of their org talent curve and need to have key contributors who aren’t making eight figures a year.
And because, like Tatis, you don’t give up the truly elite players.
Because Ethan Salas is a fucking 17 year old who’s hanging offensively in full-season ball…while catching.
And because Preller isn’t an idiot.
I don’t question his upside potential, but trading anybody that young shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand–unless you know what you’re turning down on the other side of the trade. Isn’t Salas at least a couple of years away from the majors? Two years from now, has the window closed? What do you think Preller could get for him now?
Kevin Kopps WON the Golden Spikes Award. He wasn’t just a finalist
Great Isaiah Lowe writeup. Nails the visual and the two- pitch starter arsenal.
The Lesko report is pleasingly optimistic. Just has to stay healthy…
Salas with 4 HR in the last three days…
A 17 year old kid with a 127 wRC+ in Low-A (on a .69 BB/K!) is absolutely absurd…even before you get to the fact that he’s a damn catcher!