Seattle Mariners Top 32 Prospects

Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Seattle Mariners. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. This is the third year we’re delineating between two anticipated relief roles, the abbreviations for which you’ll see in the “position” column below: MIRP for multi-inning relief pitchers, and SIRP for single-inning relief pitchers. The ETAs listed generally correspond to the year a player has to be added to the 40-man roster to avoid being made eligible for the Rule 5 draft. Manual adjustments are made where they seem appropriate, but I use that as a rule of thumb.
A quick overview of what FV (Future Value) means can be found here. A much deeper overview can be found here.
All of the ranked prospects below also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It has more details (and updated TrackMan data from various sources) than this article and integrates every team’s list so readers can compare prospects across farm systems. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bryce Miller | 24.9 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 50 |
| 2 | Harry Ford | 20.4 | A+ | C | 2026 | 50 |
| 3 | Cole Young | 19.9 | A | 2B | 2027 | 50 |
| 4 | Bryan Woo | 23.4 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 45+ |
| 5 | Emerson Hancock | 24.1 | AA | SP | 2023 | 45 |
| 6 | Felnin Celesten | 17.8 | R | SS | 2029 | 45 |
| 7 | Jonatan Clase | 21.1 | AA | CF | 2024 | 45 |
| 8 | Michael Arroyo | 18.7 | A | 2B | 2027 | 40+ |
| 9 | Tyler Locklear | 22.6 | A+ | 1B | 2026 | 40+ |
| 10 | Gabriel Gonzalez | 19.5 | A | RF | 2026 | 40+ |
| 11 | Prelander Berroa | 23.2 | AA | SIRP | 2023 | 40+ |
| 12 | Justin Topa | 32.3 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 13 | Tyler Cleveland | 22.5 | A | MIRP | 2026 | 40 |
| 14 | Lazaro Montes | 18.7 | R | DH | 2027 | 40 |
| 15 | Taylor Dollard | 24.4 | AAA | SP | 2024 | 40 |
| 16 | Michael Morales | 20.9 | A | SP | 2026 | 40 |
| 17 | Ty Adcock | 26.4 | MLB | SIRP | 2022 | 40 |
| 18 | Jimmy Joyce | 24.5 | A+ | MIRP | 2025 | 40 |
| 19 | José Caballero | 26.8 | MLB | 2B | 2023 | 40 |
| 20 | Spencer Packard | 25.7 | AA | LF | 2025 | 40 |
| 21 | Isaiah Campbell | 25.9 | AA | SIRP | 2023 | 40 |
| 22 | Darren Bowen | 22.4 | A | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 23 | Darren McCaughan | 27.3 | MLB | SP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 24 | Ashton Izzi | 19.6 | R | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 25 | Tyler Gough | 19.9 | A | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
| 26 | Peyton Alford | 25.9 | AA | SIRP | 2025 | 35+ |
| 27 | Cade Marlowe | 26.0 | AAA | CF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 28 | Juan Then | 23.4 | MLB | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 29 | Devin Sweet | 26.8 | AA | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 30 | Travis Kuhn | 25.1 | AAA | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 31 | Joseph Yabbour | 20.0 | R | SP | 2028 | 35+ |
| 32 | Walter Ford | 18.5 | R | SP | 2027 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Hitter Pu Pu Platter
Miguel Perez, CF
Ricardo Cova, UTIL
Isiah Gilliam, OF
Robert Perez Jr., RF
Hogan Windish, 1B/2B
Kaden Polcovich, 2B/OF
Alberto Rodriguez, RF
Zach DeLoach, OF
The 22-year-old Miguel Perez isn’t hitting at Modesto, but he’s still extremely projectable and covers a lot of ground in center field. He’s a potential late-bloomer to monitor for physical development, but he’s presently not strong enough to have a viable swing. Cova is now on the complex after two years in the DSL. He’s only 5-foot-8, but he’s strong for his size and can play all over the diamond. He was hit by a pitch on the knee yesterday and removed from the game. Gilliam, 26, has plus switch-hitting power and could be a bench weapon despite a 20-grade hit tool. Robert Perez Jr., 23, has plus power, but his combo of whiffs and poor plate discipline has kept him in this section of the list for a while. It looked like he was developing more patience last year, but his walk rates have regressed. Windish, 24, was a 2022 seventh rounder out of UNC Greensboro. He is hitting for power at Everett while playing a few different positions. Polcovich hasn’t played yet this year (I’m actually not sure why), and has always had an interesting power/speed blend for a switch-hitter; he just doesn’t have a clear position. Rodriguez and DeLoach have some pop but not quite the bat-to-ball skills to make the main section of the list.
Big Five Connections
Brian O’Keefe, C
Tatem Levins, C
Josh Hood, INF
All of these guys have a Philly connection of some stripe. O’Keefe, a St. Joe’s alum, is perfectly fine upper-level catching depth with power. Levins transferred from La Salle to Pitt for his senior year and had a great season. He’s a contact-oriented catcher with an athletic swing and enough ability on defense to be developed behind the dish. He needs to cover the top of the zone a little better. Hood went to Penn and then transferred to NC State for his senior year. He’s a well-built, versatile infielder with 40-grade tools on offense.
Slider Guys
Marcelo Perez, RHP
Jarod Bayless, RHP
Juan Mercedes, RHP
Jorge Benitez, LHP
Stephen Kolek, RHP
Mike Flynn, RHP
Perez is a polished college arm from TCU who is currently sitting 93 with sink and tail at Modesto and commanding his slider. Bayless (no relation to the 13-year veteran combo guard from Arizona) is a low-slot righty specialist type. Mercedes is a slider-heavy starter at Double-A who has good peripherals, but I don’t trust that he actually has good command and he’s at best a 40 athlete. Benitez is a low-slot lefty with a good changeup. Kolek has a standard mid-90s/slider reliever look; his heater plays down due to shape and below-average control. Flynn (no, not that one) was a sinker/slider sixth rounder from 2018 who has remade himself as a low-slot righty with a good slider.
Arm Strength
Juan Burgos, RHP
Troy Taylor, RHP
Natanael Garabitos, RHP
Burgos has a great pitcher’s build and has been sitting 93-96 amid some injury issues at Modesto. Taylor, a 2022 12th rounder from UC Irvine, sits 95 with sink. Garabitos is sitting 96 but still has zero feel for location.
System Overview
The Mariners system is flush with interesting developmental arms, but overall, it’s quite shallow and lacks huge impact up top. Harry Ford has the best chance to be the next homegrown star, but he’s risky and his development is likely going to be slow, as is typically the case with young catchers. Felnin Celesten didn’t look great during his brief stateside jaunt this spring, but he left Arizona quickly and then was injured, so there’s no real evidence to support a re-evaluation there. There are people within the org who love Michael Arroyo, but I’m not ready to stuff the guy just yet, though I’m poised to do so if his swing becomes more dynamic. The Mariners tend to waste little time promoting the guys they like, which is part of why the farm system doesn’t look great on paper — lots of them become big leaguers very quickly.
I would consider the Mariners a data-driven org, especially when it comes to evaluating pitchers. Their farm system is dense with guys who have big measurable breaking ball movement. Their track record of tweaking prospects and fringe big leaguers for the better is long enough now to consider them very good at developing arms. If there’s another Bryan Woo in the system, a guy who is raw developmental material right now but who looks like they have the build and athleticism to take a sizable leap, it’s Darren Bowen.
Even if the Mariners were in the thick of the AL West race right now, it would probably be easy for other teams to outbid them at the deadline. They’re a good ways back of first place in their division and the East is crowding out the Wild Card field. Yesterday, they traded Chris Flexen and Trevor Gott (one of those fringe arms they improved) to the Mets for depth arm Zach Muckenhirn, an indication of their likely posture for the next month. None of the Mariners players on expiring deals are having especially good seasons, though Teoscar Hernández would probably fetch something at the deadline if Seattle wanted to move him. If there’s any solace to be found for Mariners fans in the back half of the summer, it’s that the club is likely to have a big draft. They have three top-30 picks in a loaded class. It’s likely that all of them will be top 10 prospects in this system as soon as they sign, which will make the “high end” of this farm (anyone in the 40+ tier or above) look closer to average in terms of depth and quality.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Can’t wait to dive in. Any thoughts on Justin Topa? I assume he was left off due to eligibility but he’s not listed as a graduate.
Actually no! That was a goof – his Board record didn’t get updated after the Brewers trade somehow, and I missed it as I was putting the post together. We’ve updated here and on The Board. Thanks for spotting that!
I like the comparison of Caballero to Patrick Beverly, but I wasn’t familiar with Tie Domi and after looking him up he seems like he is in a qualitatively different category than the others. There’s a difference between being annoying and doing things like fighting with fans or sucker punching a guy unconscious, even in hockey.
Tie Domi was basically the Tim McCracken (Dr. Hook) character from Slapshot but with solid NHL skills.
If you want a chuckle, go read up on Bob Probert. He and Domi squared off a few times.
This team is incredible at finding and developing pitching. Gilbert, Kirby, Miller, Woo…probably someone else I am forgetting. It’s wild to think back to when Dipoto was with the Angels and they had the worst farm system for a couple of years. Shows what you can do when you don’t have to deal with the whims of Arte Moreno.
Woo is an above-average MLB starter right now, yet he is “projected” as a “#4/#5 starter”. There was a similar issue with Patrick Bailey in an earlier piece. Isn’t the point of all this work to say how good these players are gonna be in MLB? Or are we just opining that somehow because the scouts didn’t like him and because Woo used his fastball too much, his MLB results don’t matter? Why are we still pretending that we don’t know how good he is? What’s the point of all this?
The pitcher number system is so subjective it’s useless. Everyone has a different definition of what number one and number two, for some evaluators you have to be randy johnson with better mechanics, others Giolito makes the cut.
The most common definition I’ve seen for what’s considered an “ace” is “Top 10-12 pitcher in the game.”
Empirically, the lower end of that translates to a guy who averages ~4.5 WAR a year, which is a 65.
Which would make a 2 a 60 (3.5-4.4 WAR a year), a 3 a 55 (2.5-3.5), a 4 a 50 (1.5-2.5), and a bona fide 5th starter a 45.
You kind of have to define your terms every time because there are so many of them. Eric’s idea of a #1 is something crazy, like a 7-win pitcher. Dan Szymborski and Ben Clemens have referred to guys like Robbie Ray as aces who are something like 3.5 win pitchers. So if you’re going to call someone a #1, or a #2, you usually have to define it or else people are going to get real confused.
For me, my approach is that playoff-worthy starters are 3-win pitchers or better. If you want to get the Astros or Dodgers lineup out in the playoffs, you need a higher caliber of pitcher during than you would to get through the regular season. To feel good about your rotation, you probably need the following:
#1: A 5-win starter because you need a guy that when he starts, the game is tilted dramatically in your favor
#2: A 4-win starter, who will pitch slightly less than your 5-win starter but is still likely to pitch twice in a series
#3: A 3-win starter, a good pitcher but maybe one that you’re happier if he only pitches once
#4: A 2-win starter, ideally this guy doesn’t start but you don’t want a chump if you don’t have enough rest days to start your core 3 over.
In other words, it’s the 5-4-3-2-1 system, where a #1 is 5 wins, a #5 is 1-win, and everything else is reversed too. You can obviously still win a world series without it, it’s just harder.
Going full Rob Neyer by ignoring fractions, haha!
Uh, I mean, we should start a lengthy internet brawl over the difference between a guy you trust to give at least 4.5 WAR and a guy you trust to give you 5 WAR!!!
I’d offer to maybe throw in some stuff about Beltran being a fringe HoFer on the numbers, and how being a lefty is much more special and difficult than being a switch hitter…but neither of us are idiots.
Speak for yourself, I forgot to pack pants or shorts on my most recent trip so I feel pretty stupid. Lucky for me there are department stores.
I’ve always loved this system for starters because A) the symmetry is perfect and B) it’s easy and makes sense for my small brain.
The other difficulty in definitions of starters is that because of pitching injuries, those categories feel fluid. How does one factor that in?
That is also why I like this system. Super easy to remember. Injuries really make taking it literally difficult though. No one doubts that deGrom is a #1 but he hasn’t had a 5 win season in a while because his arm keeps falling off. But also because of that you can’t really count on him as your ace because he probably isn’t going to be there for the playoffs.
I would rather they just say how many wins per year they think he’s gonna generate, it’s much cleaner
I assume it’s because it’s early and major league hitters will learn how to hit his one pitch better. So it will be incumbent upon Woo to add pitches or adjust. There aren’t a whole lot of effective one-pitch starters out there. And it makes no sense to compare him to the one or two unicorns.
Woo is in the very beginning of his major league career, didn’t pitch much in the minors overall, is producing quality but averaging less than 5 innings per start and has legitimate concerns even at the major league level. Quality beginnings don’t always translate to stable results, and in fact they very rarely do. Even then, you have to adjust for the fact that most of this is a reflection of entire careers to date and was compiled over the previous 6-8 months, and can only factor in the recent success to a point. I agree that mid rotation starter is his most probable outcome, and yah he may be even better. Conversely, the league may yet adjust to him and he could also get worse. That’s the issue with trying to evaluate someone you didn’t get to see much during their development. That’s prospecting by definition. No one is trying to slip one by you. The analysts just don’t have the volume needed to make a full declaration yet, and that’s appropriate.
I would also disagree that the point of these is to say how good he CAN be, rather than what their most likely outcomes WILL be. Lots of prospects have otherworldly ceilings if they can reach it. They rarely do because baseball is hard. Viewing prospects exclusively from that lens may be fun for some but to others is just unrealistic, and others still (like myself) actually feel more value in precise analysis of probabilities rather than dream player designations.
I dunno – I’m pretty sure every prospect list is TEH FAILZ for not rating Ivan Nova before the 2011 season!
It’s less than 30 big league innings. That is way too small of a sample size to really say anything conclusive about in terms of total production. If he gets shelled in his next start the way he did in his first start his season ERA would jump to 5.57. Eric basically has him graded as right on the edge of a 50FV which would be a most likely outcome of about a 1.5-2 WAR pitcher.
Going off 2022 and using fWAR, that would be about the #71-88 SPs in MLB. That was guys like Giolito, Rich Hill, Robbie Ray, Michael Wacha, Charlie Morton, and Jon Gray. A guy like Wacha or Cal Quantrill are probably decent comps for what a 45+ FV starter looks like over a longer stretch.
Wacha’s averaged ~2.5 WAR/200 over his career.
He’s the definition of a “mid rotation starter,” when he’s on the field – that’s a 50.
A 55 is a guy like Jordan Montgomery – strong 3rd starter.
The post-Pittsburgh version of Charlie Morton is a #2.
I was only referring to 2022 Charlie Morton which was his worst season since he got to Houston. Obviously he has been an excellent pitcher for most of the last decade.
As for Wacha, I was thinking of it was he is at about 2 WAR/162 over his career since his career high in innings is 181 and he only has qualified one other time. Almost exactly league average on a rate basis as a low-mid volume starter. That is somewhere in the 45+ to low 50 range, essentially where Woo is being rated.
Good call on using starts rather than IP as the denominator – pitching deep into games matters, and Wacha doesn’t.
That said, he’s still in the 2-2.5 WAR range if you use “Per 30 Starts.”
I’d say he’s a textbook 4th Starter/50 FV guy…but we all know the textbook #4 was Bronson Arroyo, haha!
It took so long for this list to come out that I was actually at the point of hoping it got released after next week’s draft when the Ms have 3 of the top 30 picks
You have José Caballero listed at 4’11”. If you told me he wasn’t really 5’11” I might believe you, but that seems a bit much. Only 1 inch taller than Mei Suruga.
It sure would be something, though, wouldn’t it? It was a goof and has been updated – thanks for spotting that.
If Cabe was 4’11 he’d walk even more!
Have you seen Sam Carlson since he changed his arm slot? Early in the season he was getting hit a lot, but he’s been stringing up zeros for around a month. Curious if he might be sneak back into the rankings.
Was going to argue on Arroyo and Gabe G., but Eric makes a plausible case to make them prove it. I do think Gonzalez will lower his chase rate and is currently underrated. OTOH, the homer rate is lower too. The scouting grades on his glove and arm are accurate, so your floor is an above avg OF who hits for higher AVG and less power than the visual would indicate. Will Benson is sort of that dude for the Reds where the chase has been successfully mitigated and the bat has blossomed.
Arroyo reeks of different. Riding ‘til the wheels fall off. Can’t wait to reexamine the swing with Eric’s notes nearby.
I am really looking forward to the Mariners’ draft and they need high quality bats. Though they generally go for best available, it wouldn’t shock me to see them go for 2 college bats in their first 3 picks, especially their first pick so that they can go over-slot for at least one of their next picks. I could see them going for a high-ceiling HS arm in the 2nd round.
What could T. Hernandez return if they are sellers at the deadline? Could they move Suarez as well or is he too expensive?
There are a lot of interesting college bats that should be available in that range. I keep hearing that Schanuel and Chase Davis will go higher than their first pick but one could fall. Colton Ledbetter and Brice Matthews are also very model friendly and will likely be available with the comp picks, and we know the Mariners rely heavily on their models.
Some disagreements with the caveat as always that Eric and the FG team is much more privy to info than I am. I am not high on Mariners farm but am clearly higher than Eric
Bryan Woo- To me he is a low end 55, his elite extension and ability to command his FB up in zone makes it more of a 70 to me. I am not sure he has a true plus off speed pitch offering but I don’t think he needs one to be a 2.5-3 war guy. The changeup/slider both look ok to me tho I do find it a bit odd he isn’t throwing his changeup more (particularly to lefties). Obviously he won’t be able to continue with a 75% FB rate with this success (sub 3 xERA) but I think at around 60% it will still work very well even as scouting reports get out.
Harry Ford- I like the swing when aggressive, I do think at times he takes self defense cuts almost like he pre determined not to swing but when aggressive it works. He’ll walk a lot, maybe he ends up in RF but I think bat profiles there too. He’s a 55 to me as well
Gabriel Gonzalez- He can rake and think he’s a solid 50 even with the SSS
Clase- I don’t disagree here just wanted to point out that he is one of the more interesting guys in the minors, if the new found power is real he can really soar up lists.
Hancock- This guy I am lower on than Eric, I think the FB would be one of the worst among MLB starters even at it’s velo, just terrible shape. He’s a pure pen guy for me and likely not of high leverage kind
Agreed. Article is cautiously quiet on how good Clase is right now and potentially can be iffffff he cuts down on his K’s. He may have 20 home runs and 50 steals before allstar break. Don’t forget also was selected to the futures game. I love your articles. Would love you to quantify his steals when you mention speed. And also show some trend analysis and point out how crazy his game was last year. Have a happy 4th!
Also his k rate yes is 30 percent but also has a good eye with a 14 percent walk rate. He’s just turned 21 and in AA. He also was not mentioned skyrocketed up the mariners list this year. Also I have noticed that at least the last three games has but down his k’s but also not hitting the ball consistently. Give it a month. I bet he will be top 20 overall by the update! As you mentioned he has speed to play any position, huge power potential showing. He reminds me of my last find when I was doing ottenue. When no one was on him. Ronald acuna! He’s a Ronald acuna if he can cut his K’s and get more hits.
To me, Jose Siri is a nice comp for Clase. Clase walks more but Siri is better in the field. Both have suspect hit tools but nice power/speed combo for legit center fielders. That’s a great outcome for Clase.
There are a lot of guys who would be awesome if they cut their K rate. I think if you are projecting on him, the calling card is that he will be able to play center field and won’t be a total black hole on offense. That is probably a 4th outfielder but you do usually need a guy like this.
What if Hancock focused his 4 seamer more to a 2 seamer so he got more movement without compromising too much on velo?
How bad could the comments in the Padres list get to have been closed?
Looks like it was just an error, haha
It was some CMS weirdness, but it should be sorted now. Sorry about that!
Woo: cambio; magmatic; “thump on the scale.” ??
The #26 system, including Miller and Woo? Given so many statistically impressive showings this year, I would have expected a bit better results.
Recent grads, trades, and the relative value of pitching vs hitting have really done a number on the M’s system.
They’re technically in the middle of their contention window, and they’ve graduated and traded a significant amount of prospects to get to this point. If they draft well next week, and depending on how the team fares by the deadline(they might be soft sellers if they keep treading water, hard sellers if they tank), they could replenish the system pretty quickly.