Scouting the Prospects in the Cueto Trade

If you’re reading this, you already know that the Reds dealt ace Johnny Cueto to the Royals yesterday for three lefties: Brandon Finnegan, Cody Reed and John Lamb. For an idea of where these Future Value (FV) grades would fall, check out the top-200 prospect list and the Royals prospect list from just before the season. For the big-league perspective on the deal, see Jeff Sullivan’s take, and for a more statistical look at these three prospects, Chris Mitchell has also published a piece at the site.


Brandon Finnegan, LHP, Cincinnati Reds, FV: 55

Finnegan was identified as a top prospect in his breakout sophomore year at TCU, then starred that summer for Team USA on a loaded pitching staff, then continued performing well in his draft year for TCU before some shoulder soreness before the draft. That scare coming at the worst possible time, coupled with his smaller frame, intense approach and higher effort delivery, conspired to move him down the board from a likely top-10 pick to the 17th-overall pick of the Royals.

Finnegan showed no ill effects after signing, shooting through the minors and starring in a handful of relief innings in a playoff run for the Royals. It was a mixed blessing, as early MLB relief success coupled with some questions about if a pitcher can start long-term put him in the tough situation where the team now knows that he’s close to a sure thing as a reliever, causing the patience for him learning to start gets shorter.

There have been a number of prospects that fall into this situation: Joba Chamberlain, Neftali Feliz and Jonathan Papelbon are some in the recent past and Alex Meyer and Aaron Sanchez are two young players in a similar situation to Finnegan now. The Reds tend to draft/sign upside type players in general and particularly don’t mind taking a chance on developing starter traits when there’s a talented young arm: Raisiel Iglesias was a reliever in Cuba that they’re converting to a starter in pro ball and two recent Reds first rounders, righties Michael Lorenzen and Nick Howard, were two-way players and college closers being developed as starters. Some in the organization still say that they think Aroldis Chapman would’ve become a bona fide starter if they would’ve been patient enough, if not for his situation, which could repeat itself with Finnegan.

Finnegan sits 91-95 and hits 98 mph as a starter (sitting closer to the mid-90s in relief), relying on a slider that’s above average to plus (more consistently plus in relief) and a changeup that will flash above average at times, but it and his command will waver at times, as he’s still more of an aggressive thrower with big stuff than a true starter at this point.  The common comparisons are to Scott Kazmir and Billy Wagner and scouts have been using those two names to show the upside scenario (mid-rotation starter) and the more common outcome (shutdown lefty closer).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

I had Finnegan 56th in my offseason Top 200 and a 55 FV and I still have him in the same spot as this season hasn’t really shown us much that wasn’t expected to happen: some struggles with command and consistency that are magnified in longer outings. It sounds like the Royals may have thought internally that Finnegan was most likely to end up a reliever and the Reds tend to be more open-minded about who can start (especially if there’s athleticism and stuff) than other teams, so this match makes a lot of sense. I would expect Finnegan to gets some big-league starts in Cincinnati next year and possibly some down the stretch this year, contingent on what the Reds top pitching instructors think will serve his development best.


Cody Reed, LHP, Cincinnati Reds, FV: 50

Reed was a prospect only known vaguely by even local scouts early in his draft spring in 2013 when he was at a Mississippi junior college.  He threw in the low-80s in 2010 and was 88-90 early in 2013, but spiked to hit 96 mph in most outings from the second half of his draft spring, which helped him go in the second round to the Royals. There was some doubt about Reed among scouts since he was facing weak competition and was throwing hard for just a few months before the draft, so there wasn’t the track record teams would like to see.

As Reed’s velo would slip late into games in college, it also slipped a bit after turning pro, which is pretty normal for a pitcher just getting stretched out while in the longest season of his career. The command, which was never great, was also a little worrisome in his first two pro seasons, but what teams liked so much about Reed as an amateur was his 6-foot-5, 220-pound frame that could hold a lot more strength, the athleticism and the quick arm: those elements were still there.

This year, Reed has been showing the promise he flashed two years ago. Reed hit 99 mph in the California/Carolina All-Star Game earlier this year and has been up to 97 mph in most starts this season.  The slider, which was a 50-55 pitch in previous years, is now flashing plus (60) with the added arm speed and his body appears to be adjusting to the new arm speed along with some mechanical tweaks. With an easy plus fastball, potential plus breaking ball and enough changeup and command to possibly start, you could argue Reed may be the best prospect in this deal in another year or two, since the size/durability advantage over Finnegan means there’s more upside here.

Reed was one of the last few cuts from the Royals Top 28 entering the season, which was going to be an important year for Reed’s development. A scout I talked to yesterday said Reed would be 100-150 in all of baseball for him at this point and he’s roughly comparable to the 50 FV prospects from last year’s big list, so that opinion tracks with my notes as well. I’d expect Reed to spend all of next year in the upper level of the minors and then have a chance to be in a big-league rotation in September next year but more likely in 2017.

John Lamb, LHP, Cincinnati Reds, FV: 40 Video

Lamb was a former top prospect who, after Tommy John surgery in June of 2011, never got his premium stuff back but has reinvented himself as a pitchability arm with improved feel. His stuff was fringy across the board last year and it improved a bit this year to around average, with the changeup his best pitch (solid average) and the velocity sitting around 90, but the breaking ball a clear third pitch that’s often below average. Lamb was also a late cut from the Royals preseason list with Reed (both 35+ FV), but I’ll bump Lamb onto the Reds list, due to the improved stuff this year and the recent track record of average stuff/pitchability-type fringe prospects turning into solid big leaguers with a few slight adjustments.

Lamb is at least a solid inventory arm that could be a fifth starter or long man sooner than later (one scout called him “an extra guy”), but he’s big-league ready and one or two out of every ten of these type of pitchers turns into something better than a fifth starter, so getting the chance to find out if Lamb is one of those guys (and find out soon) is a solid gamble for a third piece in a deal.





Kiley McDaniel has worked as an executive and scout, most recently for the Atlanta Braves, also for the New York Yankees, Baltimore Orioles and Pittsburgh Pirates. He's written for ESPN, Fox Sports and Baseball Prospectus. Follow him on twitter.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Garrett
11 years ago

I don’t think this trade was great nor was it horrible but as a Jays fan where all reports stated that the Reds would have given us Cueto only if Stroman and more prospects were in the mix, I have trouble understanding how the bar was so high for us but not nearly so high for them. Just feel like the reds settled a little bit.

Garrett
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

Maybe I’m just jealous …

maguro
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

And maybe the reports are wrong.

ceee
11 years ago
Reply to  maguro

the jays don’t really have the same low floor prospects to give up. The jays have an elite group of tier 1 arms (guys you just don’t move) and a bunch of tier 3 guys who don’t have enough value unless they’re added to something else. Kansas City had those tier 2 guys, that are solid, but are not cant miss. Unfortunately, the Jays traded 3 of those type of guys away for Donaldson. Which severely limits there abilities going forward.

Alex
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

“All reports” was just a a reporter or two stating what they’d heard. A week ago every team was asking for the moon in trade; the Jays probably got more reasonable offers on the weekend and decided not to pull the trigger. Or they disengaged earlier. In any case, the bar would have been the same for every interested party.

Mark
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

Stroman was never really going to be traded and Jocketty knew that. Look at the Greinke trade to LAA – same package as Cueto, a top 50-100 prospect and secondary pieces. That’s the market value for rental players. For the Jays, that’s Norris, or Hoffman, or Pompey, with someone like a Boyd as an equivalent to Lamb and pick a lesser tier guy for a third player.

I think that’s what the Jays balked on, but it’s easier to report Stroman was the guy they were after. And I’m sure Cinci asked that, and never expected it to go through. But you don’t ask for Norris first, because that’s not smart negotiating.

jdbolickMember since 2016
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

Toronto doesn’t really have the depth of mid to high minors power arms that Kansas City does, so it’s understandable that they would need to take a quality over quantity approach to get something done. If Cincinnati didn’t see all three pitchers in this deal contributing at some point in 2016 and beyond, they presumably don’t accept it. Believing that all three will do so in some form makes up for none of them being all that impressive individually.

Adam
11 years ago

Kiley: “Reed may be the best prospect in this deal in another year or two.”

Chris Mitchell: “Reed appears to be the least likely of this trio to develop into an impact big leaguer”

Any particular reason you seem to like Reed more than Chris does?

Brian
11 years ago
Reply to  Adam

Not Kiley but . . .

My guess is its partly because Lamb and Finnegan are much closer to the majors than Reed. Reed has a lot more development time and projection.

68FCMember since 2020
11 years ago
Reply to  Adam

Chris uses a statistical model that uses minor league statistics and age relative to league average to estimate value. Kiley is a scout. So, Kiley will pick up on changes quicker than Chris, since statistics take time to adjust, but Chris should be better at finding sleepers without great tools that simply perform well.

cynical jerk
11 years ago
Reply to  Adam

Kiley only changes his mind once all the other major publications change their minds.

Ivan Grushenko
11 years ago

Calling Scott Kazmir a “mid-rotation starter” seems low to me considering he averaged 4 WAR per season 2005-2007. That’s more like a #2 starter, no? I guess you could #2 “mid-rotation” but that would be sort of harsh.

james
11 years ago
Reply to  Ivan Grushenko

Kazmir is the definition of mid rotation. He is not really an ace, and even when he had produces terrible results, he still found a home in a rotation. That really is the whole gamut of mid rotation.

It is also an apt comparison, Finnegan is not likely to be a consistent mid rotation peice like a James Sheilds. Where he puts in solid games every night. More likey he is the guy who has 5 good starts then looks like a bum for a night (classic Kazmir).

The point is, the stuff is there, it is just a matter of figuring it out. Worst case, barring injury, he could handle himself as a set up man in the bigs.

cs3
11 years ago

2005-2007?

you realize its 2015 now, right?

Robert
11 years ago

I forget what Greinke got when he left KC and signed with the Brewers, but how good would they have been last year had they paid him what he was asking. Who knows how that would have affected the team they ended up with last year tho. Most likely would have been different and may not even made their trip to the fall classic. So maybe it was a good thing they let him walk.

Za
11 years ago
Reply to  Robert

Off the top of my head, they wouldn’t have Lorenzo Cain, Alcides Escobar, Wade Davis, or James Shields had they not traded Greinke. The first two were in the trade and Odorizzi helped them get the other two. That trade was critical in creating the current KC team.

KDH
11 years ago
Reply to  Robert

Greinke (along with Yuni Betancourt) was traded for Cain, Escobar, Odorizzi and Jeffress. Cain has become a legitimate star this year but last year was his coming out season. Escobar is a top notch defensive SS with average offensive output. Both are important pieces to the Royals squad last and this year. Odorizzi was shipped as part of the package in the Shields/Myers deal from which Wade Davis is a vital player to the Royals bullpen. Jeffress is perhaps the only one who did not provide a net return for the Royals.
So keeping Greinke would have made this team a much different team than what they are now. It was really a win-win trade in hindsight for both teams in my opinion.

KCExile
11 years ago
Reply to  Robert

They got Alcides Escobar, Lorenzo Cain, Jake Odorizzi, and Jeremy Jeffries. Odorizzi was key to the Wade Davis deal (see what i did there?) while Cain and Escobar are the centerpieces to the elite defense they rode to the WS.

I’d say that if Greinke didn’t demand out of KC, the Royals would never have built the team they are today.