Some Breakout Hitter Candidates, Courtesy of Exit Velocity Percentiles

I think I might be on to something. While fiddling around with some 2022 batted ball data in an attempt to improve my programming skills, I created a list of players whose 95th-percentile exit velocity most outstripped their average exit velocity. If you want that in plain English, that’s players who hit the snot out of the ball when they connect, but whose average exit velocity is weighed down by a pile of mishits. Second on this list among players with at least 200 batted balls? Oneil Cruz, a poster child for cartoonish maximums and frequent contact issues.
With Cruz coming in near the top of this list, I thought I might have a bead on something cool. Jo Adell (only 162 batted balls, but still), Michael Harris II, and Pete Alonso are all high up there, and they’re the kind of players I would expect to see. They’re also interesting players from a breakout perspective; if something clicks and they start making more consistent contact, they could turn into monster hitters overnight.
That’s unfair to Alonso, who is already a monster hitter, but there’s even some instructive value there. Alonso and Mookie Betts had strikingly similar lines in 2022 by strikeout rate, walk rate, isolated power, BABIP, and wRC+:
| Player | BB% | K% | ISO | BABIP | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mookie Betts | 8.6% | 16.3% | .264 | .272 | 144 |
| Pete Alonso | 9.8% | 18.7% | .246 | .279 | 143 |
One category where they weren’t similar? Alonso’s top end exit velocity is far superior to Betts’s. I mean, obviously. Have you seen Mookie Betts? Have you seen Pete Alonso? If Alonso were getting to his power as often as Betts gets to his, he’d be putting up Yordan Alvarez numbers. Indeed, Alvarez and Alonso have nearly identical 95th-percentile exit velocities, but Alvarez hits the ball 5.5 mph harder on average. He’s consistently hitting the ball on the screws, in other words. No wonder, then, that he posted an isolated power 60 points higher than Alonso.
If you’re thinking that I’m mostly just redefining scouting concepts like raw power and game power, you’re completely right. In fact, the leaderboard for 95th-percentile exit velocity is pretty close to a list of the 15 players with the best raw power (shout out to Mike Zunino, whose 70 batted balls probably don’t deserve to make the list but who I really wanted to include anyway):
| Player | 95th Percentile EV | Batted Balls |
|---|---|---|
| Giancarlo Stanton | 114.9 | 263 |
| Oneil Cruz | 112.7 | 205 |
| Aaron Judge | 111.6 | 399 |
| Vladimir Guerrero Jr. | 111.5 | 521 |
| Jorge Soler | 110.9 | 180 |
| Kyle Schwarber | 110.5 | 378 |
| Yordan Alvarez | 110.1 | 370 |
| Pete Alonso | 110.1 | 478 |
| Gary Sánchez | 109.5 | 287 |
| Mike Trout | 109.4 | 300 |
| Julio Rodríguez | 109.3 | 363 |
| Willson Contreras | 109.3 | 309 |
| Austin Riley | 109.2 | 450 |
| Joc Pederson | 109.1 | 281 |
| Mike Zunino | 109.1 | 70 |
I’m getting sidetracked here, though. We’re talking about the gap between these 95th-percentile numbers and average exit velocity. I decided to comb through the data and look for hitters who could break out if they improve their consistency. I looked for players whose top end power is better than league average but who aren’t getting to it with any consistency, likely because they mishit the ball far too often. There’s no real scientific criteria here aside from that. I just picked some names who have big average/top-end gaps and have plus power. I also focused on young hitters and ones with particularly high 95th-percentile numbers:
| Player | 95th Percentile EV | Avg EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oneil Cruz | 112.7 | 91.9 | 20.8 |
| Jesús Sánchez | 109.0 | 89.4 | 19.6 |
| Jorge Alfaro | 108.8 | 89.4 | 19.4 |
| Michael Harris II | 108.7 | 89.4 | 19.3 |
| Nolan Jones | 108.3 | 88.5 | 19.8 |
| Shea Langeliers | 108.0 | 87.3 | 20.7 |
| Joey Bart | 107.3 | 86.6 | 20.7 |
| Jo Adell | 107.2 | 87.1 | 20.1 |
| Dermis Garcia | 106.6 | 86.5 | 20.1 |
| Jose Siri | 106.4 | 86.1 | 20.3 |
That’s a neat list, but I think it probably overstates how much signal there is in this. Learning to make loud contact more consistently isn’t exactly easy. It’s also not necessary; Alonso, Willson Contreras, and Giancarlo Stanton would be right at home on this list if they weren’t already good, and I only put Harris on there to emphasize that he might have another gear. On the other side of the coin, Franchy Cordero has been on lists like this for his entire big league career without ever figuring it out. This isn’t a definitive list, but I think it’s an interesting one.
From there, I went down to the bottom of the list: the players who get to their power most frequently. It probably won’t surprise you to learn that freshly minted Marlin Luis Arraez is the player with the lowest gap between his average and 95th-percentile exit velocities. He’s just so dang consistent. Andrew Benintendi, Myles Straw, Josh Harrison, Whit Merrifield, and Jeff McNeil are in that general zone too. You roughly know this type of hitter; the guy who squares everything up thanks to a short, repeatable swing.
My general thought here was that I could use this type of filter to look for hitters who I think aren’t very likely to put up premium numbers. But, uh, that plan isn’t right. Also hanging out at the bottom of the list: Freddie Freeman, Betts, and Alex Bregman. Those three combined for 79 homers last year. They’re definitely not the slap hitters we’re looking for. There’s a sneaky cross-correlation going on here that’s messing up the results.
One way to have a small gap between your 95th-percentile EV and your average EV is to not hit the ball with authority. Everyone mishits the ball somewhat similarly; if you don’t have a ton of power, your good hits will simply have less distance from those poorly struck balls.
Another way to have a tiny gap between your average exit velocity and 95th-percentile mark is to simply avoid mishits. If you’re almost always getting to your best contact, that gap will necessarily be narrow. Betts boasts above-average top-end power, sure, but that’s not his standout talent. He just hits the ball on the nose so often that he doesn’t have much soft contact to speak of.
Last year, 411 players put at least 100 balls into play; Betts ranked 404th out of that group in the rate of batted balls he hit 75 mph or less. In other words, almost everyone else in baseball mishit the ball more frequently than him. For what it’s worth, Arraez ranked 407th on that same list; he combines the two ways you can have a narrow gap between average and 95th-percentile EV, which is why he has the lowest gap in the majors.
With that in mind, I have another list to keep an eye on: hitters who boasted above-average 95th-percentile exit velocity but small gaps between that and their average exit velocity. As before, I’m highlighting players who feel like they’re being undervalued or might break out; I’m not topping the list with Betts or Freeman even though they’re the best-case outcomes for this class of hitter. Without further ado, some potential laser beam merchants:
| Player | 95th Percentile EV | Avg EV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| David Bote | 106.0 | 92.4 | 13.6 |
| Ji-Man Choi | 105.6 | 92.1 | 13.5 |
| Stone Garrett | 104.8 | 92.9 | 11.9 |
| Zack Collins | 104.6 | 91.0 | 13.6 |
| Lourdes Gurriel Jr. | 104.2 | 90.6 | 13.6 |
Now, are either of my two lists of young and potentially breakout-worthy hitters predictive? I’m not yet sure. I’m doing a little back-checking on who would have been on these lists in the past now, probably in service of another article later this week (it is January, after all). They do mean that I’ll be watching these players with interest, though. If anyone on that high-power, low-consistency list starts putting up a solid hard-hit rate or otherwise showing off contact consistency, I’m going to start believing they’re the real deal immediately. Likewise, I’ll be more willing to accept that good seasons from any of those five names on the latter list aren’t a fluke; they’ve demonstrated the ability to strike the ball firmly and consistently.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
It’s interesting that all of the players on the final list (ex. Gurriel) have massive K%. You’d think that players who are able to make consistent hard contact would also make consistent contact, but perhaps that’s the difference between the Betts/Freemans of the world and these guys. If so, that is where improvement needs to come in order to believe that a breakout is real.
Or hitters who swing conservatively on difficult pitches or adverse counts make contact but not hard contact, while hitters who swing for the fences on every pitch either hit the ball hard or miss it completely.
Could that that list be identifying players with a “grooved” swing if I’m using the term correctly? I’m thinking of players who use the same swing regardless of pitch type and location. That could produce some very hard hit balls and lots of swings and misses. Mark Reynolds is the player I think of most with this phenomenon. A friend and I joked that he would randomly decide when to swing, and if the pitcher threw the ball in the right place he’d crush it. Obviously not fair to him, but it was amusing to us.
And if he did mishit it it would be more likely to be a foul pop or foul tip? This type of hitter might be less likely to improve since swinging conservatively isn’t in his skill set
My brother and I frequently enjoyed the same joke. Something about Reynolds’ swing in particular looked the exact same every time. And he was no stranger to missing a pitch by a foot or more.
Hah! That’s pretty funny to hear.
ONeil Cruz has had 370 MLB PA and struck out in 130 of them (35.1%). He also hits more ground balls than fly balls. His walk rate is…fine, but not elite. I get the ridiculous power, but there are multiple holes in his swing, and focusing solely on EV seems to ignore these things and the lack of progress in these areas. (I also wouldn’t count on PIT to be the franchise that helps him get the most out of himself)
It’s not a knock on EV, but hitting feels like a composite skill even if the output is TTO
It’s fun how this article is supposed to be about Oneil Cruz but it’s also about Mookie Betts. Betts just has that rare, 80 grade bat control where he maximizes all of his power and gets the bat solidly on the ball a huge amount of the time.
I can’t remember the exact benchmarks for power grades but I remember the first time I looked at his max EV and average EV / homers it looked like he had 50 raw and 65 game. He’s just got the craziest bat control.
Adell still has an option so they don’t need to trade him until a hole opens. Maybe a Rendon injury would spur a trade for an infielder. If anything there seems to be a glut of outfielders
Watching he and Trea Turner hit 1-2 for 1 year and a half was amazing. Talk about two guys who absolutely get the most out of every decision they make.
Mookie Betts is the model for Wander Franco someday hitting 30 HRs. A guy who can barrel the ball consistently developing an approach or altering their path to maximize lift.
I feel like that first list has sone guys who are legitimately inexperienced enough to learn, like Cruz and Nolan Jones, and those who have been on these lists forever. I don’t have any hope that Jorge Alfaro is going to turn the corner and Jesus Sánchez and Jose Siri aren’t far behind.
Jo Adell kinds of sits at a crossroads. I’d love to see him on a team like the Nationals to see what he can do if he gets consistent reps.
Can you think of examples where an all or nothing hitter increased contact rate while increasing overall effectiveness? I’m having trouble coming up with an example
That’s kind of a tough list. You gotta pick someone who sucked and figured it out like a Jorge Soler or maybe Joc. Nelson Cruz or Chris Davis back in the day. Rowdy Tellez did it last year as well.
Javier Baez ha ha ha.
All laughing aside, he did do this. He was BURRIED by fans/experts after his rookie half/season. Many people cant give him any credit for his improvements though, because they have a walk and strikeout fetish, when it comes to hitters.
I would argue both that Rowdy Tellez was never an “all or nothing” hitter and that he also didn’t figure much out last year.
He wasn’t quite the extreme all or nothing hitter early on, but George Springer really swung out of his shoes his first year or two. Then he toned things down just enough to have a really nice hitting profile overall. Not that others can necessarily get to the same place the same way, I think these lists are often populated with hitters with some major flaws in pitch recognition. Fastball hunters who never figure out the breaking stuff, etc.
Springer is a good example. Another Astro that followed this path, although to a lesser degree, was Alvarez. But at the same time, the Astros also developed Altuve and Bregman who were the other way around, where they never had much raw power (Altuve for instance has 9% EV but 77% xSLG) but was able to tap into enough game power to become solid all around hitters.
It would be interesting to have someone do deeper analysis to see which type of player is more likely to develop. The guy with all the power but has to learn to cut down on Ks, or the slap hitter with great bat control learning how to barrel the ball out of the park.
Conventional Moneyball wisdom is the high OBP guy can develop power as he matures. It’s why I was interested in examples of the opposite. On the other hand power is the most expensive skill so it may behoove teams to draft it.
Vlad Jr fits this to some extent, as does Rafael Devers. But those guys had better hit tools than someone like Oneil Cruz.
Aaron Judge is maybe the best one I can think of.
Aaron Judge is a good example of how 80-grade power can cover up a lot of weaknesses. But he did the opposite thing as what these guys do–he stopped trying to square up every ball and just put the bat on it because his natural power would find a way.
Still, I think it’s a good reminder that Oneil Cruz is a few tweaks away from being a very dangerous hitter. It’s why I’m trying not to completely disregard Jhonkensy Noel too, a guy who by just looking at the statline looks like he’s doomed for Quad-A purgatory. And why guys like Jordan Walker, Elijah Green, Spencer Jones, etc are worth considering on despite obvious issues. If they really do grow into / already have that kind of power, they can get away with a lot more than guys who are even one full power grade down.
Maybe I didn’t understand the question. Judge had contact questions when he came up, and has steadily decreased his strikeout rate. As you say, maybe it’s just because he doesn’t need to hit the ball 550 feet. 450 is plenty.
I think that saying Oneil Cruz is just a few tweaks away is a bit generous.
Jose Bautista comes to mind. Kris Bryant, I think, made exactly the kind of improvement, cutting his K rate substantially en route to an MVP.
The other half of Toronto’s middle of the order from back in the day probably qualifies too; I don’t think Edwin Encarnacion was ever a huge strikeout guy, but after he got to Toronto he improved his K rate and got to his power way more often, primarily by doing that pulled fly balls uber alles thing, if I remember correctly.
Oh, today’s hall of fame electee Scott Rolen would count here, too. Rolen was a ~19% K rate guy in Philadelphia; when he got to St. Louis he found another gear with the bat by cutting that to ~15% and keeping his power. After the shoulder injury he improved his strikeout rate even more late in his career, but never really had the same kind of pop again consistently. I guess he wasn’t an all or nothing guy to begin with, though. I could be deviating from what you’re looking for.
Is there a reason to call this a list of “breakout candidates” as opposed to a list of “guys who might not live up to their flashy tools”? (Or perhaps “power > hit tools guys.”) This would need to be validated using historical data before we know which one of them it is.
I’d argue that “guys who might not live up to their flashy tools” is often synonymous with “breakout candidates”. If they didn’t have the tools then nobody would be predicting a breakout!
Yeah, exactly. Anyone’s a breakout candidate if they develop a new skill! But we might equally well look at the exact opposite end of the EV list and say “if these contact hitters can just add some power, they’ll really break out.” I don’t know why we’re assuming this specific skill is the learnable one.
I think it comes down to the percentages. If 5% of these guys figure it out historically, it’s probably “guys who might not live up to their flashy tools”. But if 40% of these guys figure it out, then its probably fair to label it “breakout candidates”.
One guy that sort of intrigues is Bryan De La Cruz. He has poor plate discipline and likely won’t play every day but put up exceptional exit velo numbers. Especially as season went on
I can still hear all the idiot pirate fan, saying “but Cruz strikes out too much”.
He does! And his launch angle is a little lower than you’d like but not as bad as Ke Hayes’. Pirates need to hire a top notch biomechanics and swing guy stat if they hope to have any sort of window.
Cool article! What programming language are you learning?
Python. Or, more like I’m getting better acquainted with Pandas, which I use intermittently with mixed success.
I would highly recommend looking at PyBaseball. It has been far more useful than Pandas for analysis like this (I’m not affiliated with the project, it’s just really well done): https://github.com/jldbc/pybaseball
I’ve seen PyBaseball, and it looks neat, but given that I’m not really a programmer, I’d prefer the time I spend learning to be more broadly applicable. PyBaseball looks really cool, though, maybe after I have more of a handle on Pandas I’ll give it a shot.
This reminds me of some of the work that Alex Chamberlain did on this site around Standard Deviations of Launch Angle – the work is fuzzy in my head, but I mostly remember that because David Bote also rated well by that metric too.
Shocked to not see Ohtani on any of these lists
This article is another great reminder: I wish we had statcast data for Peak Albert Pujols.
I still don’t think there should be separate categories for raw power and game power. If you have great raw power but little game power, then the game power should be 20/70 or 30/70.
Raw power is irrelevant until it becomes game power, and the same message – a hitter has a lot of raw power but hasn’t figured things out yet – can be shown by a 20/70 game power rating.