Starting CC Sabathia Tonight is Perfectly Reasonable

In July, the Yankees sent a significant package of talent to the Oakland A’s in order to acquire Sonny Gray, hoping to improve their rotation for both the stretch run and the postseason. But now that they’re in the postseason, and their season is on the line, Joe Girardi has chosen to hand the ball to CC Sabathia instead.

On the surface, this looks like another example of one of Girardi’s primary weaknesses; overreacting to recent performances. We saw him do this with Luis Severino, bumping him to Game 4 of the ALDS after he was bombed in the Wild Card game, despite Severino being pretty clearly the Yankees best starter right now. And while Gray has a clear edge over Sabathia in track record, he didn’t finish the season very well, allowing a season-worst .330 wOBA in September, and he wasn’t good in his first outing in this series either.

Despite his struggles of late, though, Gray is pretty clearly a better pitcher than Sabathia at this point. I’d generally suggest that a team is better off relying on projections than on what-have-you-done-for-me-lately reactions, and so from a process standpoint, I don’t think picking Sabathia over Gray is a great choice.

But Girardi’s recency bias aside, there’s actually a pretty good case to be made for starting Sabathia tonight.

Thanks to Severino’s dominance on Monday and yesterday’s off-day, the Yankee bullpen is in very good shape for tonight’s Game 5. Chad Green hasn’t pitched in four days. David Robertson has had two days off since throwing nine pitches, and he had the day before that off too. Tommy Kahnle threw 22 pitches on Monday, but had two days off before that. Aroldis Chapman hasn’t pitched since Sunday.

Between those four relievers, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to expect the Yankees to get something like 6, 7, or maybe even 8 innings of work tonight. There’s no real reason why each of those guys couldn’t go two inning each if need be. So, while Sabathia is going to throw the first pitch of tonight’s game, the reality is that tonight’s starting pitcher kind of doesn’t matter.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

At most, I’d imagine Sabathia gets something like nine outs tonight. It’s difficult to see Girardi sticking with him into the 4th inning unless he’s throwing a perfect game, given the alternatives he has available. In reality, the bullpen will probably start to warm the minute Sabathia allows his first baserunner, and he’ll be pulled as soon as two guys get on at the same time. With those power arms ready to go, the Yankees just aren’t going to let any starter put them in a hole too early.

So, when deciding between Sabathia and Gray, the question isn’t which pitcher is better; the question is which one is less likely to give up runs in a hurry before the bullpen can be called in to bail them out. And right now, that probably is Sabathia.

This year, the average exit velocity on a ball hit off Sabathia was just 84 mph, tied with Kyle Hendricks for the best in baseball. The average EV on flies and liners was 91 mph, tied for sixth-best. Gray is at 87 mph/93 respectively, two ticks above where Sabathia resides on both counts.

The quickest way to get behind early is to give up a couple of rockets in the gap, or balls over the wall, before Green or Robertson can come in and strike everyone out to end the rally. And for the last few years, few pitchers in baseball have avoided giving up hard contact as well as Sabathia. Because he doesn’t strike as many guys out as Gray does, he’s more likely to give up a couple of singles, but he’s less likely to have a few extra base hits strung together before Girardi can get his bullpen warm in time to keep runs off the board.

And with the reinforcements likely to be ready very early, a couple of singles isn’t the end of the world. The starting pitcher’s job tonight is to just get something like three to nine outs. Given Sabathia’s ability to minimize hard contact, he’s probably the one best suited to getting a few outs without digging a big hole before the bullpen takes over.

Plus, if the Yankees win tonight, they already know they’re facing the Astros in the ALCS. The Astros best hitters are all right-handed. Gray is a significantly better match-up against Jose Altuve, Carlos Correa, and George Springer than Sabathia is, and having him available to start Game 1 or 2 of the ALCS, if need be, is a nice little benefit to starting Sabathia in this game.

So, while I don’t necessarily buy into the idea that Gray isn’t trust worthy enough to choose over Sabathia given their recent performances, I think the end result of starting Sabathia tonight could work out for the Yankees just fine. Given how many innings the Yankees relievers should be expected to throw, Sabathia tonight for a few outs is probably just fine.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JimMember since 2016
8 years ago

Plus, it gives the Yanks the platoon advantage against Kipnis, Brantley, and Bruce (and Chisenhall, though Jackson is the probable starter there).

Abomb1018
8 years ago
Reply to  Jim

Both Ramirez and Lindor hit better from the right side, although Santana is slightly worse. If Encarnacion plays DH, I’d say the platoon is in Cleveland’s favor.

OddBall Herrera
8 years ago

As a Twins fan, I see the Yankees walking into an elimination game relying on an aging command & control guy as poetic justice. I suspect & hope it will work out for them just as well as it has for us in the past 🙂

In all seriousness, I think it’s mostly academic, since we’re probably looking at a ‘once through the order then bullpen’ game either way. The difference between Sabathia and Gray over a 9 to 12 batter sample is pretty non-existent.

david k
8 years ago

The Yankees can also use Gray in relief too, if they so choose.

Francis C.
8 years ago
Reply to  david k

Yup, but most likely as an extra innings option only along with Betances.

DBA455
8 years ago

Am I to infer that controlling exit velocity – and by extension BABIP – is now accepted by the SABR mainstream as a repeatable skill?

I remain skeptical, particularly on the latter half of that.

And would point out that it’s argued elsewhere here today (w/r/t Gio vs. Roark) that ERA is a bad metric and FIP/xFIP/SIERA/etc. are much better predictors of future ability. On that measure, Gray is a superior pitcher by a solid half run. Now I am supposed to accept that the low EV renders that moot?

(I fully understand the point about this being a 3 inning start. But I am not convinced that CC and Gray are equivalent).

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  DBA455

Eh. You’re simplifying Jeff’s argument, a large chunk of which is based on the fact that 2 years of data is better than one in predicting future performance.

Gray and CC are exactly aligned on FIP and SIERA over the last two seasons. Frankly, the two biggest differentiating factors are that CC’s done a better job managing contact over the past two years, and did a better job against this same lineup recently.

(Not to mention that Gray’s homers have very much ticked up since leaving the AL West).

Also, it’s been accepted by the SABR mainstream for a few years that controlling batted balls can very much be a repeatable skill for pitchers (with a large enough sample, past ERA becomes a better predictor of Future ERA than FIP). IFFB are included as strikeouts in fWAR calculations, but not on the FIP numbers you see on the main page.

And, at the end of the day, are you really all that skeptical that more than “Luck” differentiated the results of Tom Glavine and Ricky Nolasco?