Steve Cohen Stearns Over a New Leaf

If I were an image-conscious billionaire with a disappointing baseball team on my books and unlimited financial resources, David Stearns is one of the first people I’d call to run it. The Mets won 101 games in 2022, and while 2023 represents a monumental step back for the franchise, this team still has tons of talent both in the majors and high minors. It’s also better-funded than any other team in the league.
So with Stearns due to join the Mets as president of baseball operations, we get a talented, rich team being run by one of the top executives in the sport. I don’t know if it will work, because nothing with the Mets is straightforward, but I see no obvious better idea.
The Mets had reportedly been interested in Stearns as far back as 2020, and when the Manhattan native stepped down last year, it was widely assumed that he’d take the Mets job when his contract expired at the end of 2023. Now that the worst-kept secret in baseball is out in the open (seriously, I feel a bit silly for not having this prewritten years in advance like a New York Times obituary), let’s see exactly what Stearns can do for the Mets.
Baseball leadership has been the Mets’ weakness under Steve Cohen’s tenure as owner. Team president Sandy Alderson led a scandal-plagued operation that saw one GM fired and suspended for sexually harassing a reporter and his replacement dismissed after being arrested for DWI. (He was later acquitted of the charge.) The incumbent GM, Billy Eppler, has spent Cohen’s money competently and even masterminded a creative and productive fire sale this trade deadline, when it turned out that the Mets had brought in a pair of Hall of Fame pitchers (Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander) who’d started to turn purple on the supermarket shelf. They did exactly what a team should do in that situation: eat salary to bring in better prospects. Never mind that it’s not a great sign the Mets were in that position to begin with.
(Free advice to anyone with a bit of free time and entrepreneurial spirit: Start a company that makes voodoo dolls and effigies that resemble Drew Gilbert and open storefronts in Philadelphia and Atlanta. In five years you’ll be rich enough to buy an MLB team yourself.)
But while Eppler’s front office has been good at spending Cohen’s money, it has struggled in the less flashy but more essential areas that make up the foundation of a successful baseball organization: scouting and player development. The Mets seem to have conceded as much when they fired four of Eppler’s top assistants in these areas two weeks ago.
All this is to say that I tried to lay out a one- or two-sentence aside about how the Mets have been kind of dysfunctional at the top of the baseball ops pyramid, and even that basic overview stretched out to two paragraphs, plus one more for the joke about Drew Gilbert.
In short, this is a team in dire need of a steady hand on the tiller. And looking back on some of the weird front office leadership the Mets have had in the past 25 years (the aforementioned GMs, Brodie Van Wagenen, the Triumvirate, Omar Minaya), poaching the highly regarded architect of a successful mid-payroll team might count as unorthodox for this franchise.
At age 38, Stearns has already racked up an impressive CV. After working for the league office and a variety of teams in his early-to-mid-20s, he came to prominence as the assistant GM of the Astros from late 2012 to ’15. That’s the perfect time frame, from a résumé-building standpoint: He helped pull the Astros out of the their nadir and build them into a playoff team but left before the sign-stealing scandal.
In late 2015, Stearns left the Astros to become GM of the 94-loss Brewers. Within two seasons, they were back above .500. In Year Three, they were the top seed in the NL playoff bracket, took the Dodgers to seven games in the NLCS, and kicked off a run of four consecutive postseason appearances. Stearns turned the club over to his top assistant, Matt Arnold, last winter, but the machine has continued to chug along in 2023.
Under Stearns, the Brewers have been superb developers of pitching talent: Corbin Burnes is a Cy Young winner, and Brandon Woodruff and Freddy Peralta became All-Stars. They took Drew Rasmussen, a player the Rays wouldn’t sign after spending a first-round pick on him, and turned him into a player the Rays would trade Willy Adames for. (A lot of that has to do with injury history, but the Brewers still deserve credit.) Stearns also sold high on Jonathan Lucroy, trading him to Texas for a package headlined by Lewis Brinson; 17 months later, he used Brinson as the centerpiece of a trade that allowed him to buy low on Christian Yelich.
And the Brewers’ success isn’t just the result of clever trades and great scouting. With Stearns in charge, team owner Mark Attanasio has run payrolls in the bottom half of the league. Some of the spendier years coincided with periods in which the rest of the league was on a capital strike during free agency; Stearns and the Brewers pounced, signing Lorenzo Cain and Yasmani Grandal as free agents.
In short, Stearns has overseen a front office that has done all the things the Mets have failed to accomplish, even during the team’s more successful years. He seems like the perfect peg for this opening.
Which is not to say that Stearns has been perfect. His Brewers clubs have frequently hobbled exceptional pitching with a disturbing lack of thump in the lineup. He’s a frequent trade partner of San Diego GM A.J. Preller, at least relatively speaking. If you’re vaguely aware of baseball, Preller has traded with you at least twice in the past five seasons; he and Stearns trade a lot even by those standards. Each has taken chunks out of the other in that time. And I’d argue that one of the biggest things Stearns did to help the Brewers was a trade he was involved in just before he left Houston: Carlos Gómez and Mike Fiers for Josh Hader, Adrian Houser, and Brett Phillips.
I bring all this up not to be contrarian, or to imply that I don’t think highly of Stearns as a constructor of winning ballclubs, because I do. I bring this up because, in the spirit of the obvious choice being the correct one, this hire is getting compared to Andrew Friedman leaving the Rays for the Dodgers in 2014. Friedman was then, as Stearns is now, the highly regarded mastermind of a team that won consistently despite running low payrolls in an unfashionable market. He was handed the keys to a talented but frequently aimless team with more money to spend than any other team in the league — again, much like Stearns a decade later.
Friedman has run the Dodgers for nine years. They’re about to wrap up their eighth division title in that span; the one time they failed to win the NL West under Friedman, they won 106 games, finished a game out of first place, and beat the Giants in the NLDS. Along the way, they have also won three pennants and a World Series. In addition to developing Corey Seager, Will Smith, Cody Bellinger, and Walker Buehler; they traded for Scherzer, Yu Darvish, Trea Turner, Manny Machado, and Mookie Betts; signed Freddie Freeman as a free agent; and, finally and most importantly, conjured All-Star performances from Max Muncy, Chris Taylor, and Tony Gonsolin. (Apologies if I’ve forgotten anyone; the Dodgers have had so many successful players in the past nine seasons it’s tough to remember them all.)
The Dodgers aren’t just rich; they’re also good at everything. They win every year, without exception. That is going to be the expectation for the Mets under Stearns, and God help him if they fall short.
It won’t matter that Stearns will face a few obstacles that Friedman didn’t when he first took over the Dodgers. These are by no means insurmountable, and if Stearns can bring home the piece of metal they’ll only make the victory sweeter. Namely: the Dodgers are owned by a nameless conglomerate of investment bankers that I imagine living in a tank and barely maintaining human form, like if the navigators from Dune only communicated through Magic Johnson. Cohen, by contrast, is very real, and very corporeal, and is more of a hands-on owner, for good or ill.
Second, the NL West has usually not been as competitive as the NL East is now. The Braves are the best team in baseball at the moment, and their entire core is locked up through the Rapture. The Phillies would be the insurmountable big-market bully in either Central division and aren’t going away anytime soon either. Let’s put it this way: If Stearns builds a Mets team that wins eight division titles in nine years, they should build a new Hall of Fame just for him.
Everyone in the Mets’ orbit probably understands, on an intellectual level, that this is a tougher job than the combination of top payroll and elite head of front office would make it look like. There’s every likelihood that it’ll take Stearns time to get his player development and scouting staff in place, to say nothing of a manager, which is a real concern given the wobbliness of Buck Showalter’s chair at the moment.
I have no doubt that Stearns can build the Mets into a perennial World Series contender, if Cohen gives him the time and money to do so. There’s a reason this has been such a hot rumor for so long: It’s the obvious solution. The Mets, of all teams, don’t need to overcomplicate things.
Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.
This was the obvious move, and everyone knew it. What will Stearns do now that money is limitless? I trust his intelligence and baseball savvy to make good baseball moves rather than just becoming a spendthrift, and I trust his analytical acumen, as well as Cohen’s, to really invest into R&D and player scouting and development. Cohen has set his sights large, but hey, it’s New York! His mission is apropos to the stage he’s chosen.
As a lifelong Mets fan since the mid-80s, this is what I’ve been waiting for my whole life. It started with Cohen, it continues with Stearns. If they’re successful, it will be bliss. If they’re not, you can expect the usual #lolmets peanut gallery to chirp loudly. But there is no curse, no ghost, no maleficer who siphons good juju from the Mets and funnels it to the Yankees. In such a tough division, winning the division title every year is not a given. But we don’t have to be the Braves of the 90s to be considered a success. There’s no reason that a consistent team that achieves sustainable success, some years more than others, is impossible. It’s down to science, data, and good management. And Cohen and Stearns (and somehow, Eppler) are going to bring just that. I couldn’t be more excited.
I may be going soft but I’m fine with Eppler staying he and Stearns are close and love what Eppler did at the deadline and I’d be fine with him as the number two guy.
Yeah, Eppler crushed the deadline. I was really happy with all his moves. He can stay. (To say nothing of the horrendous Darin Ruf trade last year – what was that about? JD Davis PLUS three other guys?) But overall, yeah, he’s been way better than Brodie Van Wagenen – guy should never have become an agent.
If they’re not successful, you know who to blame. I’m pretty sure that Steve Cohen is not an Arte Moreno-type meddler who is willing to spend money but only on his terms. But if the Mets aren’t challenging for the division lead long-term, I’m pretty sure the problem won’t be Stearns.
If I were a Mets fan I wouldn’t be happy that Eppler is still aboard and call me surprised that he survived this demotion. Of course I was surprised that Eppler was hired in the first place. Despite trying as hard as I could I just don’t see any history of success since he was hired by the Angels in the fall of 2015. Even with Mike Trout on the roster, Eppler’s record can only be described as a disaster.
I think he might have been worth a shot. Dipoto didn’t have much success with the Angels either. It’s hard when you have a meddling owner like that.
That said, Eppler’s moves with the Mets haven’t inspired a ton of confidence either so in retrospect, it seems suspect. I wouldn’t worry about him remaining as a second in command, though, the Yankees had plenty of success with Eppler as a lieutenant there.
With the Yankees only WS Championships count and only one since 2000 doesn’t cut the mustard. He is, yet again, another classic example of the good old boys network, Tony La Russa anyone, that permeates all major sports.
Love the move hope Craig Counsell comes in next.
Can someone explain the Drew Gilbert joke?
Gilbert is a real gamer, has looked great in the minors, and his scouting report here on Fangraphs says that he “plays with an edge, the kind of guy you love to have on your team but hate to play against, with his on-field persona toeing the line between ‘fiery’ and ‘excessively abrasive.'”
So, AJ Pierzynski?
I’m a little worried about him and that he’ll flame out spectacularly like Lastings Milledge but because he crosses someone the wrong way. I do wonder how Milledge would be received in today’s baseball zeitgeist, in this era of bat flips and personalized home run trots. Alas, we’ll never know…
My sense is that Gilbert is kind of like a wrestling heel, where he antagonizes the crowd and opposition but it’s all for show. But Pierzynski antagonized everybody including his own teammates because he’s a jerk.
Do you remember back in the day, Reggie Miller made a choking sign towards Spike Lee in an NBA playoff game? If not, feel free to read up on the reaction in New York. Those reactions are kind of a template for what you can expect the reaction to be for Gilbert.
Of course, if he doesn’t perform he’s going to be more like Lance Stephenson, a kind of ridiculous character who is most famous for trying to distract LeBron James by blowing in his ear.
I didn’t know FanGraphs was the place to go for Pacers crossover content, but I’m here for it.
I will never forget his 8 points in 11 seconds to beat the Knicks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC05ppdKu7s
“John Starks choked, we came up big”
Oof
Justin Turner! You forgot Justin Turner!
Sadly, so did the Cincinnati Reds
And the Mets!
“I feel a bit silly for not having this prewritten years in advance like a New York Times obituary”
this is such a great line. when i read those obituaries hours after someone dies, like the recent Jimmy Buffett one, i amazed at their breadth and quality.
but who works in that department? are they secretly, deeply morbid folks? do they have a Bingo card on the wall of who’s next?
anyway, i digress – back to baseball.
There’s a fun documentary about them. “Obit” (2016).
Writing advance obits actually isn’t a morbid job – it can be a lot of fun. Ultimately, understanding the body of work of someone whose contributions were significant enough that their passing is headline news gives an obituary writer a chance to speedrun a subject and learn something new every day.
(I wrote advancers for Gene Wilder and Stan Lee, for example. Those were fun.)
This is sort of what I figured would happen after the Dodgers poached so many Rays executives — the rich teams will sign the smartest guys and build juggernauts. The Dodgers have obviously done it, and I expect we’ll look back in ten years and see this as the beginning of a strong Mets franchise.
Smaller teams will eventually have longer losing periods, as competing with the haves will become more difficult. Competitive windows will be shorter for them, too.
So, basically, like baseball has pretty much always been? It’s a game of the haves and have nots since it’s inception.
Sure, but there was a period of two decades or so where tiny markets could complete by going against the grain (Moneyball, the Rays). Now, the rich teams will use those strategies, too, so poorer teams will no longer have any advantages. All teams have access to the same data, and while some teams are slightly better at utilizing the data than others, the differences between teams are much smaller than they used to be.
The small markets will have to rely on luck to get some crazy draft hauls in order to keep up.
Aren’t the Phillies barely clinging to the WC1? Also let me know when a Stearns team develops a competent position player.
Long-term, this is a good move. The Mets needed a guy who was clearly competent at his job and who knows who else is smart so he can hire them. It’s unclear to me how good Stearns really is. Clearly, he was way ahead of the curve when he started in Milwaukee–he was a Top 5 decisionmaker at baseball when he started there. Maybe he’s less ahead of the curve now. But he’s definitely one of the top 12 or so baseball decisionmakers in baseball, and with the resources of the Mets you can do a lot even if he’s not the next incarnation of Theo Epstein.
In the short-term, though, I know what’s going to happen. The Mets had a ton of injuries this year and the expectations were sky high. Next year, it’s almost certain the Mets are going to rebound to something more appropriately matched to their talent level. Stearns is going to get all the credit. And that’s cool but really, the benefits of this aren’t going to show up for a few years.
This is my take as well — it’s going to be a very easy transition for Stearns because he’ll get so much undeserved credit for the team’s luck regressing to the mean. His main tasks this winter are coming up with a pitching staff — he needs to find about four starters and five good relievers — and managing the “trade Pete???” media circus (hopefully by doing nothing), and the real early assessment should be based on how he handles that.
I would go with three of each type of pitcher but at this point it’s just debating the details. They need pitching, real bad.
It definitely feels like the Mets and Cardinals could team up to sign or trade for most of the top available starters. It’s gotta be rare for two contenders to need 3+ starters each, right?
They’re both going to be all in on the Montgomery /E-Rod level of starter. I suppose it is possible they are in on Ohtani, or Snell or Nola, but they need so many of them. (I also expect the Mets to make a serious run at Yamamoto who looks incredible right now)
a lot of their injuries involved the rotation, which isn’t going to be solved by getting healthy given that they traded two of their best 3 starters.
I’m surprised owners in the Weast’s don’t push for single table, no division format. The biggest obstacle to the playoffs for them is structural.
They could hire the ghost of Branch Rickey and it wouldn’t matter. There are zero (0) billionaire owners in any sport who’ve actually let their team presidents run things. Stearns should help, but Stevie is still gonna call the shots, and we’re fools if we think otherwise.
I’m suspicious of ownership/investment groups for other reasons (lack of accountability/transparency), but the face of the Dodgers is Friedman, not Walters/Guggenheim, and that’s a big part of how/why they’re run sustainably and well. Cohen has the $, but not the discipline.
“Scandal-plagued” – Come on, really? One GM was hired and then soon fired for behavior committed when he was with a different organization (and those orgs apparently don’t get tagged with the label of ‘scandal-plagued’, cough, cough Theo Epstein, etc.). The second guy had a DWI arrest and was later found not guilty. I think ‘Scandal-plagued’ is best served for a click-bait article. There are other front offices in which true scandals have occurred.
Yeah the Mets should have done better due diligence on Porter but the Cubs clearly did some covering up for Porter.
Also, as much as I wasn’t a fan of the guy’s moves, I don’t think it’s fair that this article lumped in Omar Minaya in with Brodie Van Wagenen. Minaya was at least qualified, having been an AGM with the Mets and a GM with the Expos.
Stearns will probably be really good in NY, but his last year in the MKE wasn’t great.
As a Milwaukee fan, my best scouting report is:
That first one is the most important part of running a team, so I think Mets fans will be happy if they get it.
I think we still underrate culture and its impact on productivity
Daniel “the culture is damn good” Snyder agrees
Honestly it’s one of the most interesting positions in baseball right now. There is going to be a ton of pressure but to have an owner willing to eat salary in the following year so they could get better prospects has to be encouraging..
That said comparing the Brewers to the Rays is a tough. The Friedman Rays were consistently competing in the toughest division in majors. The Brewers play in a much weaker division. They also haven’t developed any hitters which is concerning. Measuring any team against what the Dodgers have been able to do is an almost impossible bar to clear in today’s game.
They only did this because Chris Getz was not available.
OMG so true
Whenever he finally retires, I expect the Conglomerate to be strongly interested in purchasing a Kershaw ghola from the Bene Tleraysiax.
Great analysis, Michael. Thanks
“and if Stearns can bring home the piece of metal they’ll only make the victory sweeter” I actually LOL’d