Steve Pearce Is Playing Second Base
Understand that no one’s Plan A would be putting Steve Pearce into the lineup at second base. It would be nobody’s Plan B, either. Understand that the Orioles have been forced into a position, with J.J. Hardy hurt, and with Jonathan Schoop hurt, and with Ryan Flaherty hurt. What the Orioles have been confronted with is a situation in which the middle infield is in dire need of at least temporary help. Under these specific circumstances, Pearce at second base has become Plan A. Even that feels strange, like the sort of thing no other team would dare attempt.
Pearce, as it happens, is actually out of the lineup Tuesday, because he’s feeling under the weather. But that’s not a performance concern. Over the weekend, Baltimore played three home games in a city that isn’t its home, and in all three games, Pearce started at second. There’s a graphic for it and everything.
This is a post that leans on some assumptions. What we can’t know is how other teams would’ve behaved, if in the Orioles’ situation. We can only guess, and the guess is that other teams would’ve been far less willing to teach Pearce a new position on the fly. Pearce is a first baseman and a corner outfielder, if he’s not a designated hitter, and last year he slugged .556. He doesn’t fit the usual second-base profile. The Orioles called up Rey Navarro. He does fit the usual second-base profile. And Navarro did get four starts at second. But then things were turned over to Pearce. And Pearce played second, while more experienced second baseman Jimmy Paredes slotted in at DH.
Pearce had never before played second base as a professional. He’s 32 years old, so while, like many players, he has a distant history of playing shortstop, it’s been an awful long time. He did get a handful of innings at third base as recently as 2012, but it was hardly anything of an opportunity. How much time did he get to pick up second base, last week?
Steve Pearce has always embraced – and taken pride in – his utility role with the Orioles, but even he was a little surprised when he was approached Wednesday about playing second base.
And as the Orioles opened their three-game “home” series against the Tampa Bay Rays at Tropicana Field on Friday, Pearce saw his name in the starting lineup at second, marking the first time he has played there in his career.
Pearce first heard about the idea Wednesday. Two days later, he was given a start at second base in a game against a division rival. Pretty clearly, the Orioles were confident, desperate, or both, and here’s a little footage of Pearce learning to turn a double play at something like half speed:
Ignoring Navarro for a moment, it would’ve been perfectly understandable for the Orioles to put Paredes at second and Pearce at DH. Paredes, at least, had played second before. But the team seems to think he needs a lot of work in the field, and on the other hand, just last year, Pearce got a lot better defensively as a first baseman. It’s about versatility and protection, experimenting with ways to keep Pearce in the lineup in case, say, Schoop is out for even longer than projected, or if Flaherty needs more time off. Every team has an emergency catcher. They’re just about never used. Pearce is serving as something of an emergency second baseman, but he’s been pushed into playing, and out of this, the Orioles can learn something about a guy who ought to be one of their better bats.
What did Pearce look like in the field over three games? He didn’t mess anything up. He didn’t do everything perfectly, mind you, but he was given a job and he did it. He handled a routine groundball:
He handled a slightly less-routine groundball:
He caught a throw down and applied an easy tag:
He confidently handled a weak pop, calling off a teammate:
Pearce was also the middle part of a double play, looking perhaps better than one might’ve expected:
Slower:
The footwork was good enough. The throw was good enough. Pearce kept himself out of danger. Watch that clip, and you wouldn’t think you’re seeing a guy playing out of position. When you imagine a 1B/OF being told to play the middle infield, I think there’s an inclination to exaggerate. You figure they won’t be athletic enough. Certainly, none of them would ever resemble Andrelton Simmons. But, we understand there’s not a huge difference between third base and second base. And, a good defensive first baseman should in theory be able to handle a more difficult job. Steve Pearce is a good defensive first baseman.
Over his career at first, Pearce has been worth 12 Defensive Runs Saved. UZR puts him at +7, and based on indications, in 2014 Pearce was better than ever. The Orioles certainly believe it. And while our Positional Adjustments that go into WAR are open to be debated, the given adjustment between first base and second base is 15 runs. An excellent first baseman, then, might be expected to be an average second baseman. Maybe Pearce is fine, moving up the defensive spectrum. Maybe the most surprising thing about Pearce at second is it shouldn’t be surprising if he’s adequate.
For fun, last year, Orioles fans gave Pearce a 46 overall rating in the Fan Scouting Report. Asdrubal Cabrera got a 47. Omar Infante got a 46. Jedd Gyorko and Marcus Semien got 45s. Jason Kipnis got a 41. The FSR shouldn’t be confused with inarguable science, but the more you think about it, the more willing you are to believe that Pearce moving up in the infield isn’t even that weird. Why not try it? Why not try to maximize your roster’s versatility, just in case?
Brady Anderson just talked about Buck Showalter’s intelligence and mastery of strategy. Now, Anderson works with Showalter, so that’s one thing. And for another thing, you don’t want to overstate the brilliance of trying Pearce at a new position. It could’ve been a failure, and maybe this’ll never come up again in the long-term. But this feels like a particularly Orioles kind of move. This feels like working to build an extra layer of protection, where it would’ve been easy to just give second base to one of the guys who’s played second before. Showalter wants his Orioles to be a roster with moving parts, such that flexibility might allow them to negate another team’s potential talent advantage. It’s a small thing, but a seemingly real thing, and Pearce at second is an example of this. It seems bold, until you think about it more and realize it’s actually perfectly sensible.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.








I do wonder if they would’ve tried this experiment if Pearce was hitting. It does seem like a very Buck thing to do to give Pearce a project at 2B to occupy his mind and keep him from overthinking his hitting.
Some of his struggles are the plate are just BABIP luck (lower BABIP than LD%), but Pearce’s peripherals are all showing the wrong signals.
Aside from a big increase in LD%, I don’t really see anything in his peripherals that are much different from last year. Certainly not anything that would predict a 100 point drop in BA. Seems to me his struggles are almost completely BABIP driven. What peripherals were showing you the wrong signals?
K% is up.
I think you’re on to something especially considering Pearce’s notorious intensity. He looked like part of his problem at the plate was trying to way too hard, resulting in overthinking at bats and trying to crush the ball rather than make solid contact.
He’s a dude that sort of just looks angry all the time so you really notice in the situations where he looks angrier than usual, and he’s looked like that after every unsuccessful at bat this year.
RE: Oriole Angry-Meters, I place Joey Belle number 1.
3B Davis, SS Machado, 2B Cabrera, 1B Pearce has to be better than this.
Disagree. Davis is not good at third and Cabrera is not good at second.
But Cabrera is good at short?
I would’ve tried playing Pearce at 3rd and sliding Machado and Cabrera to the right.
The idea is probably to minimize the number of players playing out of familiar position at once
It does raise the question of how Pearce ended up NOT being a 3B in the first place… though it looks like the Pirates tried him there a bit, and he was pretty bad (-16.5 UZR/150) in a small sample. Maybe his arm is an issue? He does seem to have generated negative value with his arm as a right fielder.
I would have thought playing major league level defense at 2B would require not only athleticism (which Pearce has) but also years of constant repetition, training and practice.
If Pearce can handle 2B reasonably well without years of practice, I wonder how many other players could do so with an off-season to prepare.
Probably quite a few 3B (and quite a few have, as Jeff points out). Probably only a few 1B and OF because of handedness. But probably not zero.
Maybe the bar is really about being able to play defense at the MLB level rather than a specific position, plus the athleticism needed for the position.
I believe that players are placed in more defensive positions in Japan and Korea that they are in the US. Certainly Jung-ho Kang playing catcher comes to mind. It’s probably detrimental to the defense, to be sure, but there might be hidden value in the flexibility as well. I often feel that some defensive stereotypes are being followed too strictly, such as guys the size of Jason Heyward not being placed in CF.
OF and 1B aren’t overwhelmingly left-handed. Those positions are just not as applicable – e.g. OF doesn’t do grounders and 1B doesn’t need middle-infield range or much of an arm.
I have to admit, I’m a little disappointed by the lack of Aubrey Huff style hilarity (http://33.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2umx0nuio1qz9tufo1_400.gif)
CLEARLY Buck Showalter has Pearce on his fantasy team, and wants him to have 2B eligibility.
Though Jeff wouldn’t write about that, since (as he’s forced to remind people every chat) he doesn’t play fantasy.
The emergence of Paredes (who doesn’t really have a position) along with the injuries have caused a lot of shuffling. It will be important to get Pearce going with the bat.
There was some vague reference to a missed play or 2 with Navarro, but I don’t know what that was. Man, it’s gotta be rough to get edged out by Pearce if you’re a second baseman.
Just as first base is where slugging outfielders go to die, so is second base for the rest of the implied, to the point where most second basemen go pro later in their lives (after four years of college) than SS because they may need the extra time to get good enough.
If Daniel Murphy of the Mets can learn 2b, why not?
If I was Jimmy Paredes, I’d be more upset with Delmon Young being picked to play RF over me than Steve Pearce being picked to play 2B.
Paredes is perhaps worse in the outfield than the infield, although he is pretty rough at both. He had a good day at 2b yesterday, though.
At first I wanted to compare this to Jeff Manto getting starts at 2B and SS with the Red Sox. But, aside from having his breakout season with the O’s at age 30, Pearce’s shift is way more remarkable. Manto was originally a 3B who had played some 2B and SS in the minors in his late 20’s. Pearce was pretty much used as a 1B as a Pirates minor-leaguer, with the occasional start in a corner outfield spot.
And from the looks of it, Pearce has the chops to be a passable 2B. At least enough to not wipe out the offensive edge he has over the other candidates while Schoop is on the mend.
wow, he looks better than Daniel Murphy at 2B…
How is it that Hanley Ramirez can’t figure out a corner outfield spot after months of trying, yet Steve Pearce can slide naturally into playing 2B despite having never played middle infield before as a professional at any level? Just a huge differential in coaching ability between these two franchises or what?
More likely a huge difference between the players.
A guy named Homer Bush played second base professionally. I’m sure Steve Pearce can do it.
Flashing leather vs NYY tonight!