Sun Burnes: Arizona Signs Ace Righty Corbin Burnes to Anchor Rotation

Jonathan Dyer-USA TODAY Sports

Last offseason, the Diamondbacks were in search of a marquee starter to pair with Zac Gallen atop their rotation. The market was thin at the top – Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Shohei Ohtani were probably never available to them, so their best options were Sonny Gray, Blake Snell, Eduardo Rodriguez, Shota Imanaga, and Jordan Montgomery. They signed two of those guys, and neither delivered the rotation-stabilizing performance they had expected. But instead of waving their hands in the air and raving at the injustice of variance, the Diamondbacks got right back on the horse:

BREAKING: Corbin Burnes to Diamondbacks, $210M, 6 years. opt out after 2 years

Jon Heyman (@jonheyman.bsky.social) 2024-12-28T06:32:12.313Z

Corbin Burnes was the best free agent pitcher available. In each of the last five seasons, he’s been one of the top pitchers in the game, racking up a 2.88 ERA, 3.01 FIP, and 816 innings pitched. He’s second in WAR (21.7) over that time frame, second in RA9-WAR (23.2), second in strikeouts (946), and third in innings pitched. In other words, he’s been a capital-A Ace, a set-it-and-forget-it choice at the top of the starting rotation. He’ll receive $35 million a year for six seasons, with an opt-out after the second year of the deal, which also includes a $10 million signing bonus.

With Gallen also on their dance card, the Diamondbacks have one of the best one-two combinations in the majors. That doesn’t even include Merrill Kelly, a borderline All-Star when healthy, or Brandon Pfaadt, who looked like he was finally breaking out before a rough final two months of the season. Add in Montgomery and Rodriguez, and Arizona goes six deep with plausible playoff starters. That’s how you injury-proof a rotation – sheer depth.

I’m curious to see how Burnes’ career arc will play out. He burst onto the scene in 2020 with a reworked fastball and wipeout slider that powered him to gaudy strikeout totals. He’s continued to rework that cutting fastball seemingly every year, changing its shape and using it to rack up weak contact instead of to set up strikeouts. That nasty slider that served him so well is now a backup plan; rather, he leans on a big, two-plane curveball that he’ll throw in any count to any hitter.

The result of this reinvention? Burnes has transformed into a command-and-grounders pitcher instead of a short-stint strikeout artist. His 2021 Cy Young campaign covered only 167 innings; he missed a few turns that year because of illness, but also rarely worked late into the game. He’s eclipsed 190 innings in every season since then, while striking out fewer batters each year.

It’s fair to say that Burnes is no longer the electric guy he was in 2021. It’s also fair to say that he’s incredibly effective in his current form. He’s averaged roughly 4.0 WAR and a 3.00 ERA over roughly 200 innings in each of the last three years. Maybe that’s not the production of a top-five starter overall, but he’s still clearly one of the best pitchers in baseball. He turned 30 in October and doesn’t have a huge injury history or debilitating innings load. It’s reasonable to expect Burnes to carry on in a similar form for the foreseeable future.

Of course, that’s just one way things can go. Pitchers with declining strikeout rates sometimes turn into pumpkins. That’s why Burnes got Stephen Strasburg money instead of a Gerrit Cole deal. If he keeps up his recent form for the next half-decade, he’ll be a meaningful bargain for the Diamondbacks, though the opt-out limits just how great it can be from the team’s side. I’d rather have Burnes on this contract than Snell or Max Fried on the ones they signed, though all three contracts are quite similar overall. ZiPS thinks all three deals were overpays relative to model value; it would give Burnes six years and $182 million for the following projection:

ZiPS Projection – Corbin Burnes
Year W L ERA FIP G GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WAR
2025 14 7 2.97 3.29 30 30 181.7 151 60 16 51 179 139 4.2
2026 13 7 3.09 3.38 29 29 172.0 148 59 16 48 165 134 3.8
2027 12 6 3.18 3.47 27 27 164.0 144 58 15 46 153 130 3.5
2028 11 7 3.30 3.60 26 26 152.7 139 56 15 43 138 126 3.1
2029 11 6 3.41 3.75 24 24 147.7 139 56 15 42 129 121 2.8
2030 9 7 3.62 3.95 22 22 131.7 129 53 15 39 111 114 2.2

I could write for hours about Burnes. I have, in fact, on more than a few occasions. But the most notable part of this deal to me is that Arizona is the one handing out the money. The Diamondbacks made the World Series in 2023 with a $124 million payroll. They pushed that number up last year chasing a repeat performance, and then missed the playoffs by a single game. But instead of standing pat or retreating, they’re pushing the budget up again and adding to the team.

That’s a smart decision given the way the team is constructed. The rotation is great right now, but Gallen and Kelly are free agents after this year. Ketel Marte, Lourdes Gurriel Jr., and Eugenio Suárez will probably never be better than they are right now. Corbin Carroll and Gabriel Moreno are ready to contribute to a championship team. This is the Diamondbacks’ window, and they’re acting like they know it.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Does it matter that they’re playing in the same division as the world-conquering Dodgers? I mean, I’m sure they aren’t thrilled about that, but it’s simply a fact of life at this point. The NL West is a tough division, and that isn’t going to change any time soon. So instead of pouting and punting, the Diamondbacks are doing whatever they can to keep pace with Los Angeles. Good for them!

To be clear, the Dodgers are still very much the favorites in the division. However, the Diamondbacks are now squarely the second-best club in the NL West, and that’s a fine place to be, because these days they don’t need to win the division. Heck, they don’t even need to be the best of the non-division winners, because three Wild Card teams make the playoffs. Their young core is strong enough to make a push now, and that requires outside additions. Arizona also understands that this window won’t last forever, and Burnes’ opt-outs adds to the team’s urgency to strike while the iron is hot. Sure, if Burnes pitches well, the Diamondbacks could lose him in a few years. But that’s OK — the next two seasons were always going to be their most important ones. If the opt-outs were necessary to get the deal done, then so be it.

Even better, the Diamondbacks improved their roster in a way that’s both helpful during the regular season — Burnes pitches a lot of innings — and scary in a short playoff series. They now have Burnes, Gallen, and Kelly to anchor their postseason rotation, and if Montgomery returns to his 2023 form or Pfaadt takes another step forward, one of them could leap Kelly on the depth chart and give Arizona an even better trio. Either way, the Diamondbacks are positioned to perform well in a best-of-three Wild Card series, which is probably where they’ll end up if they make the playoffs, considering, well, the Dodgers.

The hits just keep coming. The Giants were reportedly in on Burnes too, and they’re both a divisional foe and a competitor for a Wild Card berth. They have plenty of money to spend and serious pitching needs, but now there isn’t anyone they can turn to for a similar impact on their rotation. Jack Flaherty? Nick Pivetta? Burnes was the only marquee name left, so the Diamondbacks managed the rare double of improving their roster while also meaningfully limiting their competition’s options with a single signing.

Maybe it sounds like I’m too optimistic about this deal. There are, in fact, plenty of ways it can go wrong. Pitching contracts are always risky, because pitching is risky. Elbows are finicky body parts, shoulders aren’t much better, and sometimes a mile an hour of velocity is the difference between dominating and getting shelled.

But even taking all of these into account, could you find a better, more reliable pitcher than Burnes? He’s consistent, and he delivers volume. He doesn’t do it with any pitches that make you wonder how his ligaments remain attached, and he’s young enough that even if he were to miss a season with injury, he could still come back strong. Sure, I’d rather have Tarik Skubal or George Kirby going forward, but those guys weren’t available. Burnes was, and he’s not much worse than them.

No free agent deal is perfect. There are always risks that come with spending so much money on a single player. It’s costly, but it’s also necessary. So if you’re going to play the free agent market, do it like Arizona just did. Sign an elite player at his peak at precisely the moment when your team needs an elite player at his peak. If you can, sign him to a deal that could keep him around for years to come, but more than anything, make sure you have him while your competitive window is open — when your team is set up to take advantage of his contributions. Quite simply, this is one of the best fits of team and player so far this winter.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rainingmozzarellaMember since 2024
1 year ago

Great article! I hate to be that guy and nitpick, but there’s no mention of Ryne Nelson, who had an incredible second half and was worth 2.2 wins overall. He’s very good, at least a mid rotation starter, and will probably have a better 2025 season then Monty or ERod, tbh.

minny505
1 year ago

I came here to say this. Calling Nelson incredible in the 2nd half is selling him a bit short. He was arguably the best SP on the team from June 1 onward. https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&lg=all&type=8&season=2024&month=1000&season1=2024&ind=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&startdate=2024-06-01&enddate=2024-11-01&team=15&stats=sta&qual=30

And Eno Sarris has mentioned on Rates & Barrels that this is not fluke results, but rather a change in pitch mix. I’d absolutely place him 4th on the list of best SPs in the Dbacks org right now, with a sizeable gap to whoever you want to place at 5.

Darren SchmidtMember since 2021
1 year ago

Very persuasive. Well done on their part. Go Dbacks!

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

i think a deeper dive into their current payroll projection – $194 million – is warranted and interesting. Ben makes brief note that they were at 124 for their world series run. They also got into the 170’s last year.

All of this after – i believe – maxing out around 140 at some point.

My “a salary dump is coming” senses are tingling. No matter what, a salary dump isnt gonna hurt the current club in a super meaningful way. but it’ll just be like, an annoying salary dump.

Maybe they package a prospect with Montgomery to get him off the books. maybe they get a prospect for Lourdes Gurriel or something to free up Alek Thomas (who is actually a significantly better player per PA, by Steamer600 WAR). Neither of these moves will move the needle significantly in a negative way. There’s an argument to be made that both moves would be *positive* (ie, Montgomery is kinda bad, and Alek Thomas may be better than Lourdes)

Just, its really hard for me to believe that the *diamondbacks* are gonna bump it all the way to $194 million when paychecks start getting sent. maybe they will. let’s see.

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

I’ll just say one more time that it would be super cool if the diamondbacks didnt feel the need to salary dump and were indeed planning on pushing 200 million. It just feels unlikely at the moment.

But. As a pirate fan, i have Lourdes Gurriel circled as a reasonable LF target for them lol. So. i guess im kinda trying to talk it into existence.

1) Diamondbacks seem to be a little heavy in payroll, but we’ll see
2) Alek Thomas may be better than him and is currently projected to be the 4th OF on Roster Resource.
3) A financial price the Pirates can afford (a good RP and a Lourdes has them in around $100 million, which is their reported payroll goal, per Dejan Kovacevic)
4) Cant imagine the “surplus value” would require a super amazing prospect going to ARI.
5) Really nice little professional hitter, which the pirates desperately need
6) Lourdes brings good defense that can slide Reynolds to the easier PNC RF. LF is cavernous and tough and had Reynolds looking bad.
7) Ben Cherington literally cannot resist a good Blue Jays / Red Sox connection

Last edited 1 year ago by JayGray007
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

The D-Backs front office would be wise to cut payroll on their terms, and for 2026 and 2027 and not now. Even if Kendrick green lighted this payroll now, it is coming down in 2026 or 2027 for sure.

Unless they have a suitor for Gurriel, probably that means holding for now and then trading E-Rod if he has a bounce back year. They’re all in for this year.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Well they can just let Kelly, Gallen, Suarez and Gurriel walk. They’ll have to grow the arb salaries but that won’t be as much

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Right. I mean I’m suggesting that the Pirates should become a Gurriel suitor but I hear what you’re saying about focusing more on clearing long term cash than on short term cash.

motleycrue84Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That kind of makes sense that salary will come down in 2026 and 2027 though given roster construction and their prospect situation, right?

Next year they have $70.5M coming off the books-with $37.5M of that being Montgomery and Suarez-they’re going to slot Lawlar into their infield mix to replace Suarez and shift Perdomo over to 3rd, while this year they’re going to have to be creative to either incorporate Montgomery in a role where he’s productive and happy or to trade him.

But that other $33M is committed to Gallen, Kelly, and Naylor. I think more than anything, this deal is an admission that they don’t expect to resign Gallen next year, and maybe not Kelly either. In 2026, they might feel ok with rolling out Burnes-E Rod-Pfaadt-Nelson-Yilber Diaz.

Will also be interested to see their appetite to trade Gurriel, Montgomery, and a potentially resurgent E-Rod.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

Perhaps Eugenio Suarez? Last year of his deal and they’ll need a spot for Lawlar to play

JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago

my not-entirely-in-tune-with-the-dbacks view is that Suarez is more likely to be a good player this year than Perdomo is, so it’s probably fine to pencil Lawlar into SS by June. but. i dont know!

minny505
1 year ago
Reply to  JayGray007

As a die hard Dbacks fan, you are correct. Domo is perfectly serviceable, especially against RHP, but Lawler has Willie Adames upside. He might take over in April already. The timeline for replacement is all about Lawler.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

This is a very interesting situation.

Kendrick is a meddler, and Boras likes dealing with types like this. So Boras and his clients can go to Kendrick and say “hey, we want to sign with you” and wheedle them into paying a ton more than they were planning to (Kendrick reportedly didn’t want to spend this much, but said Burnes was “too good to pass up.”) Has a “mystery team” up his sleeve to scare other teams, and it’s a nice safety valve in case Plan A didn’t work out.

At least in Burnes’s case, this worked for the D-Backs because he lives in Arizona in the offseason. Arizona’s secret weapon is that a lot of players live in the offseason in Arizona because they want to be close to the spring training facility. Burnes is willing to compromise on the dollars to get this nice personal amenity. So even though it’s probably too much money, it’s still “market rate.” I doubt the Giants or Blue Jays offered much more than this.

Whether or not this is a “good deal” or not, I don’t know. This is a definite win-now move, and they are definitely a very good team now. But the team is now clearly above where Kendrick wanted the payroll to be. And the last time the D-Backs spent this much money on a pitcher the owner whined about how he couldn’t afford to spend more until Greinke got moved. Makes me wonder what the opportunity cost would be if Kendrick was willing to spend this money on boring, less interesting moves. Sign Pfaadt or Gallen to extensions, probably.

David Klein
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Pfaadt I can see signing an extension but I’d be shocked if Gallen didn’t go to free agency I’d bet the D’backs probably tried to lock him up in the past.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

Would you want Pfaadt on a multi year deal?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I would. The stuff is there, the peripherals are there, and he beat his ERA by a full run in xERA. Barring injury (always a risk) it’s just a matter of time.

Last edited 1 year ago by sadtrombone
Travis LMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Pfaadt isn’t a FA until 2030, maintaining optionality and going through arb sure seems to be a better route to me. He hasn’t shown enough to want to sign him into FA years. If he shoves for a couple of years, the downside to not signing him now is saving a bit off market rate. The downside to signing him now is that the whole contract gets wasted if he gets hurt or ineffective. Just seems like no reason to lock him up – you won’t be saving much, it’ll be so far out in the future and pitchers are unpredictable, and he’s not clearly a generational talent.

I love when players get paid but he’s not a generational talent and it makes no sense to buy out his arb years.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Travis L

I think Freddy Peralta is the model more so than Spencer Strider.

Shirtless George Brett
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Its been reported Burnes was offered more money by Toronto (7 years $250 million) and he turned them down. So for this case it seems like Boras wasnt just BSing for the sake of his client.

Also another example of how Toronto will always struggle to sign top tier free agents (something people argued with me about earlier in the month).

Last edited 1 year ago by Shirtless George Brett
sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

I think I take more of a middle ground between you and your critics. It definitely has hurt them in recent free agent pursuits they have made, but I don’t know that it always will.

It seems that at least for some players, once you get to a certain level of money other factors like geography starts to play a bigger role. For those players, it’s often being close to home (or a spouse’s home) or having a robust community of your nationality nearby. We’ve seen Trea Turner, Blake Snell, Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Juan Soto and (probably) Corbin Burnes making a call like this.

A couple of these players did eventually end up going to the high bidder, but I think you’re right that the Blue Jays had no chance at these unless they went way, way over the other bids. Usually players specifically want the west coast or the east coast for the various reasons mentioned above. The Blue Jays are only nominally in the east; they’re in another country, very few players are from Ontario, they have a different mix of national backgrounds in Toronto, etc.

But there’s another issue here which is that the Blue Jays can’t really sell the players on the sorts of things like “chance to compete for championships.” The Blue Jays very deservingly finished last in their division, they have to keep banging their head against four very good teams in the future, their only two homegrown stars are about to hit free agency, etc. If the Orioles had offered Burnes that deal, maybe he goes back because the team looks like it’s going to be great for a long time. The Rangers and Astros are sliding a bit but they won championships lately. The Blue Jays haven’t been to the ALCS since 2016 and have no theory of how to get back there.

In this way they’re a bit more like the Giants (who have conspicuously struck out on most of the biggest names) than the other traditional big spenders.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Exactly.
It’s the team, not the city.

And SF is the perfect example: both are teams with money to spend but their first choices have other options and other concerns beyond top dollar.

If you’re a top FA signing a long deal you want the team to be good for most of the deal. Being on a losing team isn’t quite as much fun as playing meaningful games in oct. The money they can get elsewhere…

Jason BMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Taxes are a huge component to the equation too – because of tax rates in Canada and Arizona, Burnes will actually pocket more on his Arizona contract, according to: https://fansided.com/for-once-ross-atkins-isnt-to-blame-for-blue-jays-shortcoming-on-corbin-burnes

jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago

This is more money than Burnes is worth given his dramatic declines in strikeout rate and corresponding increase in contact allowed, but this is still a great move for the Diamondbacks and one I’m jealous of as an Orioles fan. Burnes is as good a bet as any pitcher can be to give quality innings, so even though he’s clearly not a #1 anymore, he’s the type of dependable #2 that helps throughout the regular season and gives you a chance in the playoffs.

tdmocMember since 2023
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Where are you going from here if you’re Elias? The remaining free agent options are meager, and I’m skeptical that a number 1 or 2 kind of guy is available for a reasonable trade.

jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  tdmoc

I want Max Scherzer. Who knows how many innings he can pitch at 40, but his track record and the fact that he was still effective in limited action last season leaves me to believe that he would be perfect for the Orioles.

Lanidrac
1 year ago
Reply to  jdbolick

He’s still clearly a #1 starter and even a true Ace despite that drop (which is NOT dramatic) in K rate. More contact allowed, sure, but most of it is weak contact. Try again when you realize that FIP alone is a very flawed mechanic.

Travis LMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Swinging Strike rate is down from his elite peak (15-17%), now sitting at 12-13%. Going from 33-36% K rate to 23-26% is a massive drop. xFIP also agrees that Burnes is a 3.6-3.9 true talent, which is not a #1 in my book. xERA has him slightly better, in the 3.2-3.4 range which is borderline. But given the trending, it seems he is unable to access his top shelf stuff on an every pitch basis which is strictly worse than if he could stay healthy throwing prime gear.

I could see him as a 1/2 in most years in the deal, but I worry about downside risk given the significant drop in K rate. 35% -> 25% is definitely dramatic. Looking at stat cast metrics, it’s also not clear that he’s giving up weaker contact versus previous years when he paired that with a league leading K rate. He’s definitely not the pitcher he was in his Milwaukee peak.

jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

He’s still clearly a #1 starter and even a true Ace despite that drop (which is NOT dramatic) in K rate.

Burnes’ strikeout rate declined by more than a third from 2021 to 2024. That is VERY dramatic.

Try again when you realize that FIP alone is a very flawed mechanic.

Burnes was worth ~3.5 bWAR, which doesn’t use FIP, each of the last two seasons. He is clearly not a #1 anymore.

fjtorres
1 year ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

The OP suggests the change in numbers is intentional and comes from a changing strategy and evolving pitch mix. As long as he’s effective, why assume change = decline?

Lots of pitchers have evolved from throwers to pitchers to finesse over long careers and they had long careers precisely because of that evolution.

Last edited 1 year ago by fjtorres
jdbolickMember since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  fjtorres

The OP suggests the change in numbers is intentional and comes from a changing strategy and evolving pitch mix. As long as he’s effective, why assume change = decline?

Because the OP is wrong. Corbin Burnes said himself that his cutter had become less effective because of how he was gripping it, and while it did improve slightly after some changes in September, it’s still not close to the pitch it used to be.

The whiff rate on his cutter dropped from 32% in 2021 to 19% in 2024 because it lost a lot of its run, going from 4.2 inches of horizontal break in 2021 to 2.4 inches of horizontal break in 2024.

Burnes was trying to compensate for decreased velocity by throwing the cutter harder, which worked in terms of mph, but negatively affected its movement. Going forward, he will have to choose between sacrificing velocity or movement, but whatever he decides, it won’t be the pitch that made him so dominant in 2021. He’s still really good despite the decline, but clearly not a #1 anymore.

David Klein
1 year ago

Good move for both sides imo and while Burnes’ k rate has been going down the past four years it did tick up in September up to near 28% so that’s something to watch. The D’backs rotation is stacked, I gotta wonder if they have a Montgomery trade in the offing, I really like Nelson and Pfaadt a lot and think they have very bright futures. The top three teams in the nl west and east are incredibly strong, but one team will miss out because a weaker team in the nl central will make it instead so a team that wins 90 or so games will head home when if they were in the AL they’d be the second seed.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

If you are the Tigers, how much do you offer Skubal to make him a Tiger for life? And would Skubal take it? The idea of paying $210M for Corbin Burnes makes me think that if Skubal hits the open market he would beat Gerrit Cole’s deal. And the Tigers don’t have a lot more important than keeping him and Greene right now. So maybe you try and give him a 10 year extension at $250M? More? Burnes is a 4 win pitcher now instead of a 5+ win pitcher. What kind of money is a team really willing to commit to pitching, especially since pitchers break?

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I personally would spend big on position players, trade for pitchers on short term deals and develop oodles of disposable relievers including MIRP. They don’t have to be great, just better than replacement level starters.

This is with the Tiger budget not the Mets budget.

David Klein
1 year ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

And even with the Mets budget they are staying away from long term deals for pitchers in their 30’s.

david k
1 year ago
Reply to  David Klein

…now….

Brock244
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Skubal is a boras client so that would be a tough sign. He’s only got 2 years left on his contract, so I don’t think he’d be super open to an extension, unless is was legit market rate.

Last edited 1 year ago by Brock244
JayGray007Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

i guess if we’re talking about handing out a 10 year 250M contract i guess i’d say that they could probably let Skubal walk in two years and hand that contract to a hitter instead, and try to keep churning out arms out of the farm? idk!

Last edited 1 year ago by JayGray007
Old Washington Senators FanMember since 2020
1 year ago

Great move for Arizona. Tough blow to Baltimore, given the upgrades New York and Boston are making in their division. Orioles are still uber-good, but need to go all in on that young Japanese fella who’s posted now – or go for depth with vets and hope the young guys like Rodriguez blossom.

CC AFCMember since 2016
1 year ago

“ Pitchers with declining strikeout rates sometimes turn into pumpkins.”

It’s rumored that if you go out to the Sonoran desert at midnight and say “Mad Bum” three times, an 88mph fastball will appear from the ether to drill you in the ribs for being a nerd

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I can’t believe you fired this amazing comment on an article that nobody but me is coming back to read. (If you reuse it, I won’t tell.)