Szymborski’s 2022 Bust Candidates: Pitchers

On Wednesday, I looked at the hitters I’m bearish on, so it’s time to finish the series for 2022 with the pitchers that are causing me worries. (If you’re wondering about my breakout picks, wonder no more.)
So what exactly is a bust? I don’t take it to mean that a player is awful or has no value. For me, a bust is a player who will step down a tier in performance or who is in a down cycle and has passed the window to get back to what they used to be. None of the players involved are literally without value, and some of them are still really good. But they’re all players I think will be well below their best, usually in a manner that makes me sad as a baseball fan.
Before getting to the 2022 candidates, here are my ’21 bust choices and how they performed:
- Corey Kluber: 3.83 ERA, 3.85 FIP, 1.5 WAR in 80 IP
- Patrick Corbin: 5.82 ERA, 5.41 FIP, 0.2 WAR in 171.2 IP
- Jon Lester: 4.71 ERA, 5.41 FIP, 0.0 WAR in 141.1 IP
- Martín Pérez: 4.74 ERA, 5.54 FIP, 0.6 WAR in 114 IP
- Marco Gonzales: 3.96 ERA, 5.02 FIP, 0.6 WAR in 143.1 IP
- Johnny Cueto: 4.08 ERA, 4.95 FIP, 1.5 WAR in 114.2 IP
- Rich Hill: 3.86 ERA, 4.34 FIP, 1.7 WAR in 158.2 IP
- Dustin May: 2.74 ERA, 3.30 FIP, 0.5 WAR in 23 IP
Nobody really shone here, but by the same token, nobody was legendarily awful (I had expected Lester to go down that route and he didn’t really). We obviously didn’t get a ton of Kluber, but he was definitely much more effective than I expected. My concern with May was that he was still rather awkward at punching out batters, despite the explosiveness of his stuff, so I was happy that he spent April proving me very wrong about where he was as a pitcher — then very unhappy as he tore his UCL in early May and required Tommy John surgery.
As a reminder, I selected all of these players by Opening Day, so there’s no knowledge of anything that happened after Opening Day. It would have been really awkward if someone on my list had surprise Tommy John surgery this week!
Jack Flaherty, St. Louis Cardinals
Flaherty’s rise to prominence was fueled by a nasty slider, resulting in one of the most marvelous half-seasons we’ve seen in living memory in 2019. While his ERA last year looked fine and his FIP, though disappointing, wasn’t actually terrible, that slider seemed largely missing last year. It was hit very hard in 2021, with exit velocities five-to-eight miles per hour harder on sliders than in other seasons. His knuckle-curve remained effective, but it’s not really used as an alternate breaking pitch against righties; with its nearly forkball-esque sudden dip at the end, it’s mostly a tool against lefties, where many other righties will use a changeup (Flaherty doesn’t really have an effective one in his repertoire). That lack of an out pitch against righties fueled a big reverse spike in his platoon splits last year. I’m bearish until I see the slider biting again (and until he’s healthy and on the mound again, too).
Noah Syndergaard, Los Angeles Angels
Signing Syndergaard to a one-year, $21 million contract was a deal that I thought a lot of teams should be interested in. The team that actually gave him that deal, the Angels, was not one of them; Los Angeles’ thin rotation and status as fringe contenders should have had it more interesting in high floors than ceilings. Thor’s exciting velocity was largely missing in his brief return last fall and in spring training, and that knocks him down a whole bunch of pegs for me.
Syndergaard has said that he expects his velocity to tick up over the season, but I’m not pinning hopes on that. After so much time lost due to injury, that promise is a bit like buying smaller-sized clothes because of a future diet you haven’t yet started.
Noah Syndergaard said tonight he expects his fastball velocity to tick up as the season gets going. Tonight he was sitting around 94-95.
— Sam Blum (@SamBlum3) April 4, 2022
Chris Flexen, Seattle Mariners
The return of Flexen from Korea and him being a big part of the Mariners surprising everyone and staying in the playoff hunt until the final weekend of the season was a really fun story in 2021. But given that he’s a fairly soft-tosser by modern standards, he has a very small margin of error as an easily hittable pitcher with a microscopic strikeout rate. I like the crafty veteran archetype and wish the current game allowed more of it, but in a world that focuses on things like exit velocity and launch angle, surviving long-term is extremely difficult. The ones who’ve done so tend to be some combination of high groundballer and low exit velocity, but Flexen isn’t particularly adept at inducing wormburners, and his contact-against stats were fairly ordinary. I’m disappointed to say it, but I think he’s more of a decent fourth starter.
Michael Pineda, Detroit Tigers
Pineda was one of my Do Not Sign pitchers this offseason — theoretically, as I do not own a team — because of a gaggle of red flags. His dip in contact rate supported the drop in strikeout rate, he lost significant amounts of already marginal velocity, and he was hit really hard at times in 2021. Every season, there’s a veteran who implodes suddenly and completely and finds himself on a surprise retirement tour (hi, Jake Arrieta!). I think there’s a good chance that Pineda is 2022’s example.
James Karinchak, Cleveland Guardians
Watching Karinchak is a lot of fun in that most at-bats seem to be a battle as to who is more confused about where the ball is heading. He struggled last year after baseball’s sudden enforcement of foreign substances, leading to rampant speculation about whether he was one of the Spider Tack Squad. It was even enough to earn him a demotion late in the season.
However, while it’s hard to prove whether that was an issue, even before the decline in effectiveness, batters were more successful at laying off his so-filthy-it-offends-Potter Stewart curveball and waiting to crush a fastball in a location Karinchak did not intend. I know the hope of the Guardians, given their fairly thin bullpen, is that with an entire offseason to get his stuff together, he would bounce back, but I’m not so sure. I think that when he’s back from his current muscle strain, he needs to spend some time in the minors refining his stuff. It’s too bad, too, because Karinchak has been a ton of fun when he’s on.
Emilio Pagán, Minnesota Twins
If I can pick up a fascinating undervalued starting pitcher (Chris Paddack) for one year of any closer (Taylor Rogers), I’m almost always very happy to do that. I’d just not be crazy about getting Pagán as part of the package. He’s hit far too hard to be fully trusted, and while homer rates can be quite volatile, he throws more barrels than Donkey Kong. (Uh oh, there’s nobody left in the majors who is old enough to have played Donkey Kong in an arcade. Please find me a more timely reference, fellow kids.) Even worse, ZiPS thinks his walk rate should have spiked quite a bit more given the big dropoff in first-strike percentage last year.
Mark Melancon, Arizona Diamondbacks
After a dropoff from 9.1 strikeouts per nine in 2019 to an abysmal 5.6 in 2020, Melancon’s strikeout rate bounced back last year. But ZiPS doesn’t think it really should have bounced that far, as he had pretty much the same underwhelming swinging-strike and overall contact rates that he had the year before. I might be more optimistic if he played in front of one of the elite infield defenses, but Arizona is fairly ordinary in this department, and I don’t expect a surfeit of bailouts from his teammates.
Bryse Wilson, Pittsburgh Pirates
I tend to have a soft spot for disappointing post-prospects that have become a bit underrated, but I’m just not seeing it with Wilson. The Pirates weren’t ever going to steal an elite prospect for Richard Rodríguez, but Wilson’s stuff looks notably worse to me across the board than it did back in his prospect days. ZiPS was still (slightly) hopeful given his age but thought he was even worse than his atrocious runs allowed number in 2021, pegging him with a zFIP over six. He wasn’t able to even strike out Triple-A hitters last year. Even in an extraordinarily weak Pirates rotation, I’d wager that he’s out of it before June.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
The Donkey Kong reference might be the only video game reference I understand.
Syndergaard won’t even stay healthy enough to get his velocity up. He gets hit by more red shells than Mario!
I just don’t think I agree that Syndergaard, who hasn’t pitched in two years, can be cast as a “bust” because if he’s replacement level he’ll basically be offering the same value he did the last two years. Similarly, Karinchak, Pagan, and Wilson weren’t very good last year either (and two of them were bad in 2020 too). So predicting them to bust isn’t really fair. Like, Pagan is already 0.5 wins ahead of where he was from 2020-2021 combined.
I think I buy the other ones for various reasons, with Flexen being the most obvious regression candidate after being great in 2021.
When you are getting paid $21M dollars if you don’t perform at a very, very high level then you are most definitely a bust.
I mean, is Syndergaard a bust because the Angels are bad at evaluating risk? Is the context his past level of performance, or the decisions of the front office?
Syndergaard would be a bust because he was widely expected to be better than that. Fangraphs ranked him #15 on their list of the top 50 free agents, ahead of guys like Rodon and Kershaw. The Mets extended him a qualifying offer, and reportedly other teams were making competitive offers. All this was in spite of the fact that everyone and their grandpa knew he’d be on an innings limit. We can say, in hindsight, that all these people were bad at evaluating risk. Or, we can say that Dan is reasonable for thinking that a replacement level Syndergaard would be a bust.
So what’s a bust in this context? It’s a one-year deal. Is a 2.0-2.5 WAR season a bust? That’s $10.5-$8.4 million per WAR, which was around market rate for pitching this offseason.
IMO, considering the state of the Angel’s starting rotation before they signed him, so long as Syndergaard is an above average pitcher in WAR, it will probably be worth it.
I’m with you on this. I’m not sure I have a great sense of what $21MM is supposed to buy these days, and I’m also not sure why Syndergaard is supposed to perform poorly based purely on his velo. I’d like a lot more recent context than Syndergaard can provide before preemptively labeling his value (un)successful.
This one just seems much more tenuous than the others by necessity.
Karinchak’s 2021 was a tale of two seasons. First 21 games, he had a 0.44 ERA and a 1.28 FIP. From that point forward, they were 6.23 and 6.11. Probably wasn’t all sticky stuff related since his decline started before the ban. But the ban likely didn’t help. And expecting him to return to early 2021 form would be a very foolish bet.
Good luck ducking the lightning bolts, Dan
So in addition to Flexen, Melancon, Pineda, and Flaherty–who I think are all pretty reasonable picks to decline–here are my relatively risky picks to bust.
Marcus Stroman: I love Marcus Stroman, and I thought the Mets should have brought him back, but my goodness did he benefit from playing in front of Lindor. I think xERA underrates ground-ball pitchers, but I don’t think he’s putting up a 3.02 ERA this year or a 3.49 FIP. (This is also how I feel about Melancon–ground ball pitchers often hang on longer than you expect, but not at this level, not when they don’t get K’s, and not when they’re older).
Casey Mize: That 3.71 ERA looked good last year but I don’t think of him as being that much of a ground ball pitcher, and he got hit kind of hard last year, and he doesn’t miss bats. I’m on the fence about this one, since he did only put up 1.3 fWAR last year, so you could make a case that this is just who he is. I think he’s a 5th starter, maybe a 4th starter, unless he gets a new pitch. Cal Quantrill is also in this bucket for me; whether he’s going to bust depends on which metric you want to use.
it feels a little cruel to use Angels as the posters for both the pitcher and hitter busts. but then again they’re totally addicted to paying up big money for guys who might be really good but have a great chance of being really bad too
Does Loup count here? I’m sure he’s gonna be good, but there’s no way that 0.95 ERA in 2021 is sustainable
Loup was also not-great at stranding inherited runners, which, of course, wasn’t reflected in his ERA. Totally OT, but watching Loup pitch last year made me think that maybe departing and incoming pitchers should be charged with fractional runs, based on how many outs there are, and where the inherited runner(s) are. The degree of difficulty is higher for a reliever who comes into a game with nobody out and a runner on third is quite different than if there are two outs and a runner on first.
They could do shared earned runs, like how tackles/sacks can be shared in the NFL.
This is a weird list of players.
Flaherty: Currently hurt
Syndergaard: Hasn’t pitched in two years
Flexen: Ok, maybe, but not a big name to make a list like this
Pineda: In AAA building innings
Karinchak: Demoted last year, currently hurt
Pagan: Solid relief pitcher, but inclusion on a list like this seems weird
Melancon: Can see this one, seems to always be on edge of breaking.
Wilson: Bust from what? What did people expect from him anyway?
I was hoping there would be some big names here. Lets go out on a limb and talk about why Cole or Woodruff or Kershaw or somebody will bust.
Aroldis Chapman and Shohei Ohtani?
Yeah, I was looking at Cole as a possibility. He definitely pitched worse after the sticky stuff ban, then pitched poorly in the playoffs, pitched poorly in spring training, and has now pitched poorly in his first two starts of 2022. I’m sure he’ll still easily put up 3-4 WAR but I doubt we’re getting peak-Cole this year.
Cole is a good candidate to bust. It would shock nobody if the lack of sticky stuff reverts him to the guy he was in Pittsburgh, but older. Say a 2 WAR PITCHER. Playable but hardly what the contract expects.
He was mostly excellent post sticky stuff crackdown until he hurt his hamstring. Spring training stats are meaningless. He had one bad inning in his first start, and was much sharper in his 2nd start, except for 1 pitch the Vladito (the 2nd HR and double were not bad pitches). He might not be quite as good as peak sticky stuff Cole but I think people are getting carried away by the stick stuff narrative.
Yeah. There’s not much actionable here.
He’s not as big a name as Cole or Woodruff or Kershaw, but the more I look at him the less confident I am in Stroman. He’ll be worth a spot in a rotation every 5 days this year but the arrow is pointing down.
Dan, maybe I’m being a bit cynical, but it seems like your definition of breakout and bust is somewhat arbitrary. So, I was thinking it would interesting and more objective to define a breakout or bust using your ZIPS projections (e.g. a breakout is… maybe something like 80th (or 70th?) percentile or higher in your ZIPS projection for the upcoming season and bust is 20th (or 30th?) percentile or lower). What do you think? Thanks
Give yourself some credit for Patrick Corbin phew, if Lester wasn’t awful then what would qualify as awful
I read the intro and didn’t see anything about relievers not being eligible for this list, so if they are, I’m going with Liam Hendriks. I’m a White Sox fan so I have some history with this. In the early 90s, Bobby Thigpen had his legendary season in 1990, an effective season in 1991 with some red flags, and by 1992 he was pretty much a guy you no longer wanted out there with the game on the line. Granted Hendriks at his peak was so much better than Thigpen ever was, but it feels like they’re on the same path.
What is your evidence for this? Thigpen is totally irrelevant. Hendriks has put up 3 beastly seasons in a row, and his K and BB rates have improved each year. Sure, his HR rate spiked last year (likely partially due to the move from Oakland to Chicago), but his xERA and xFIP were career best and 2nd-best last year, respectively.
Is your ‘Hendriks is the new Thigpen’ story based solely on the results of 3 games he’s pitched so far this year? BTW, his velo looks great, and he’s got a 21:0 K:BB ratio in those three innings.
These name are not very… actionable? The other lists were great, this one is a bit light.
“I’m disappointed to say it, but I think [Chris Flexen is} more of a decent fourth starter.”
Flexen slots in as the fourth starter in a Seattle rotation behind Robbie Ray, Logan Gilbert and Marco Gonzales.
Is that decent and disappointing?
I am pleasantly surprised not to see Adam Wainwright on this list.
bryse wilson sure feels like a guy who needs to be seen if their stuff spikes in a bullpen role. Seems like the early returns are good on moving Wil Crowe to the ‘pen.
Donkey Kong lives on, so your reference should be good. He’s even being played by Seth Rogen!
Here, I’ll go bigger: last year’s AL Cy Young winner.
We’ve seen this movie with Robbie Ray before. Remember 2017? His ERA and FIP that year were strikingly similar to 2021. He regressed immediately the next year.
Karinchak is an interesting one, I think he can take over for Clase at some point.