Szymborski’s 2022 Bust Candidates: Pitchers

Gary A. Vasquez-USA TODAY Sports

On Wednesday, I looked at the hitters I’m bearish on, so it’s time to finish the series for 2022 with the pitchers that are causing me worries. (If you’re wondering about my breakout picks, wonder no more.)

So what exactly is a bust? I don’t take it to mean that a player is awful or has no value. For me, a bust is a player who will step down a tier in performance or who is in a down cycle and has passed the window to get back to what they used to be. None of the players involved are literally without value, and some of them are still really good. But they’re all players I think will be well below their best, usually in a manner that makes me sad as a baseball fan.

Before getting to the 2022 candidates, here are my ’21 bust choices and how they performed:

Nobody really shone here, but by the same token, nobody was legendarily awful (I had expected Lester to go down that route and he didn’t really). We obviously didn’t get a ton of Kluber, but he was definitely much more effective than I expected. My concern with May was that he was still rather awkward at punching out batters, despite the explosiveness of his stuff, so I was happy that he spent April proving me very wrong about where he was as a pitcher — then very unhappy as he tore his UCL in early May and required Tommy John surgery.

As a reminder, I selected all of these players by Opening Day, so there’s no knowledge of anything that happened after Opening Day. It would have been really awkward if someone on my list had surprise Tommy John surgery this week!

Jack Flaherty, St. Louis Cardinals

Flaherty’s rise to prominence was fueled by a nasty slider, resulting in one of the most marvelous half-seasons we’ve seen in living memory in 2019. While his ERA last year looked fine and his FIP, though disappointing, wasn’t actually terrible, that slider seemed largely missing last year. It was hit very hard in 2021, with exit velocities five-to-eight miles per hour harder on sliders than in other seasons. His knuckle-curve remained effective, but it’s not really used as an alternate breaking pitch against righties; with its nearly forkball-esque sudden dip at the end, it’s mostly a tool against lefties, where many other righties will use a changeup (Flaherty doesn’t really have an effective one in his repertoire). That lack of an out pitch against righties fueled a big reverse spike in his platoon splits last year. I’m bearish until I see the slider biting again (and until he’s healthy and on the mound again, too).

Noah Syndergaard, Los Angeles Angels

Signing Syndergaard to a one-year, $21 million contract was a deal that I thought a lot of teams should be interested in. The team that actually gave him that deal, the Angels, was not one of them; Los Angeles’ thin rotation and status as fringe contenders should have had it more interesting in high floors than ceilings. Thor’s exciting velocity was largely missing in his brief return last fall and in spring training, and that knocks him down a whole bunch of pegs for me.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

Syndergaard has said that he expects his velocity to tick up over the season, but I’m not pinning hopes on that. After so much time lost due to injury, that promise is a bit like buying smaller-sized clothes because of a future diet you haven’t yet started.

Chris Flexen, Seattle Mariners

The return of Flexen from Korea and him being a big part of the Mariners surprising everyone and staying in the playoff hunt until the final weekend of the season was a really fun story in 2021. But given that he’s a fairly soft-tosser by modern standards, he has a very small margin of error as an easily hittable pitcher with a microscopic strikeout rate. I like the crafty veteran archetype and wish the current game allowed more of it, but in a world that focuses on things like exit velocity and launch angle, surviving long-term is extremely difficult. The ones who’ve done so tend to be some combination of high groundballer and low exit velocity, but Flexen isn’t particularly adept at inducing wormburners, and his contact-against stats were fairly ordinary. I’m disappointed to say it, but I think he’s more of a decent fourth starter.

Michael Pineda, Detroit Tigers

Pineda was one of my Do Not Sign pitchers this offseason — theoretically, as I do not own a team — because of a gaggle of red flags. His dip in contact rate supported the drop in strikeout rate, he lost significant amounts of already marginal velocity, and he was hit really hard at times in 2021. Every season, there’s a veteran who implodes suddenly and completely and finds himself on a surprise retirement tour (hi, Jake Arrieta!). I think there’s a good chance that Pineda is 2022’s example.

James Karinchak, Cleveland Guardians

Watching Karinchak is a lot of fun in that most at-bats seem to be a battle as to who is more confused about where the ball is heading. He struggled last year after baseball’s sudden enforcement of foreign substances, leading to rampant speculation about whether he was one of the Spider Tack Squad. It was even enough to earn him a demotion late in the season.

However, while it’s hard to prove whether that was an issue, even before the decline in effectiveness, batters were more successful at laying off his so-filthy-it-offends-Potter Stewart curveball and waiting to crush a fastball in a location Karinchak did not intend. I know the hope of the Guardians, given their fairly thin bullpen, is that with an entire offseason to get his stuff together, he would bounce back, but I’m not so sure. I think that when he’s back from his current muscle strain, he needs to spend some time in the minors refining his stuff. It’s too bad, too, because Karinchak has been a ton of fun when he’s on.

Emilio Pagán, Minnesota Twins

If I can pick up a fascinating undervalued starting pitcher (Chris Paddack) for one year of any closer (Taylor Rogers), I’m almost always very happy to do that. I’d just not be crazy about getting Pagán as part of the package. He’s hit far too hard to be fully trusted, and while homer rates can be quite volatile, he throws more barrels than Donkey Kong. (Uh oh, there’s nobody left in the majors who is old enough to have played Donkey Kong in an arcade. Please find me a more timely reference, fellow kids.) Even worse, ZiPS thinks his walk rate should have spiked quite a bit more given the big dropoff in first-strike percentage last year.

Mark Melancon, Arizona Diamondbacks

After a dropoff from 9.1 strikeouts per nine in 2019 to an abysmal 5.6 in 2020, Melancon’s strikeout rate bounced back last year. But ZiPS doesn’t think it really should have bounced that far, as he had pretty much the same underwhelming swinging-strike and overall contact rates that he had the year before. I might be more optimistic if he played in front of one of the elite infield defenses, but Arizona is fairly ordinary in this department, and I don’t expect a surfeit of bailouts from his teammates.

Bryse Wilson, Pittsburgh Pirates

I tend to have a soft spot for disappointing post-prospects that have become a bit underrated, but I’m just not seeing it with Wilson. The Pirates weren’t ever going to steal an elite prospect for Richard Rodríguez, but Wilson’s stuff looks notably worse to me across the board than it did back in his prospect days. ZiPS was still (slightly) hopeful given his age but thought he was even worse than his atrocious runs allowed number in 2021, pegging him with a zFIP over six. He wasn’t able to even strike out Triple-A hitters last year. Even in an extraordinarily weak Pirates rotation, I’d wager that he’s out of it before June.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mahoney
4 years ago

The Donkey Kong reference might be the only video game reference I understand.

remyec007Member since 2018
4 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Syndergaard won’t even stay healthy enough to get his velocity up. He gets hit by more red shells than Mario!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I just don’t think I agree that Syndergaard, who hasn’t pitched in two years, can be cast as a “bust” because if he’s replacement level he’ll basically be offering the same value he did the last two years. Similarly, Karinchak, Pagan, and Wilson weren’t very good last year either (and two of them were bad in 2020 too). So predicting them to bust isn’t really fair. Like, Pagan is already 0.5 wins ahead of where he was from 2020-2021 combined.

I think I buy the other ones for various reasons, with Flexen being the most obvious regression candidate after being great in 2021.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

When you are getting paid $21M dollars if you don’t perform at a very, very high level then you are most definitely a bust.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

I mean, is Syndergaard a bust because the Angels are bad at evaluating risk? Is the context his past level of performance, or the decisions of the front office?

sugarberg
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Syndergaard would be a bust because he was widely expected to be better than that. Fangraphs ranked him #15 on their list of the top 50 free agents, ahead of guys like Rodon and Kershaw. The Mets extended him a qualifying offer, and reportedly other teams were making competitive offers. All this was in spite of the fact that everyone and their grandpa knew he’d be on an innings limit. We can say, in hindsight, that all these people were bad at evaluating risk. Or, we can say that Dan is reasonable for thinking that a replacement level Syndergaard would be a bust.

hughduffy
4 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

So what’s a bust in this context? It’s a one-year deal. Is a 2.0-2.5 WAR season a bust? That’s $10.5-$8.4 million per WAR, which was around market rate for pitching this offseason.

IMO, considering the state of the Angel’s starting rotation before they signed him, so long as Syndergaard is an above average pitcher in WAR, it will probably be worth it.

E-Dub
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m with you on this. I’m not sure I have a great sense of what $21MM is supposed to buy these days, and I’m also not sure why Syndergaard is supposed to perform poorly based purely on his velo. I’d like a lot more recent context than Syndergaard can provide before preemptively labeling his value (un)successful.

This one just seems much more tenuous than the others by necessity.

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Karinchak’s 2021 was a tale of two seasons. First 21 games, he had a 0.44 ERA and a 1.28 FIP. From that point forward, they were 6.23 and 6.11. Probably wasn’t all sticky stuff related since his decline started before the ban. But the ban likely didn’t help. And expecting him to return to early 2021 form would be a very foolish bet.

Last edited 4 years ago by Left of Centerfield
CC AFCMember since 2016
4 years ago

Good luck ducking the lightning bolts, Dan

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

So in addition to Flexen, Melancon, Pineda, and Flaherty–who I think are all pretty reasonable picks to decline–here are my relatively risky picks to bust.

Marcus Stroman: I love Marcus Stroman, and I thought the Mets should have brought him back, but my goodness did he benefit from playing in front of Lindor. I think xERA underrates ground-ball pitchers, but I don’t think he’s putting up a 3.02 ERA this year or a 3.49 FIP. (This is also how I feel about Melancon–ground ball pitchers often hang on longer than you expect, but not at this level, not when they don’t get K’s, and not when they’re older).

Casey Mize: That 3.71 ERA looked good last year but I don’t think of him as being that much of a ground ball pitcher, and he got hit kind of hard last year, and he doesn’t miss bats. I’m on the fence about this one, since he did only put up 1.3 fWAR last year, so you could make a case that this is just who he is. I think he’s a 5th starter, maybe a 4th starter, unless he gets a new pitch. Cal Quantrill is also in this bucket for me; whether he’s going to bust depends on which metric you want to use.

MRDXolMember since 2021
4 years ago

it feels a little cruel to use Angels as the posters for both the pitcher and hitter busts. but then again they’re totally addicted to paying up big money for guys who might be really good but have a great chance of being really bad too

hombremomento
4 years ago

Does Loup count here? I’m sure he’s gonna be good, but there’s no way that 0.95 ERA in 2021 is sustainable

idliaminMember since 2024
4 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

Loup was also not-great at stranding inherited runners, which, of course, wasn’t reflected in his ERA. Totally OT, but watching Loup pitch last year made me think that maybe departing and incoming pitchers should be charged with fractional runs, based on how many outs there are, and where the inherited runner(s) are. The degree of difficulty is higher for a reliever who comes into a game with nobody out and a runner on third is quite different than if there are two outs and a runner on first.

JupiterBrandoMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  idliamin

They could do shared earned runs, like how tackles/sacks can be shared in the NFL.

carterMember since 2020
4 years ago

This is a weird list of players.

Flaherty: Currently hurt
Syndergaard: Hasn’t pitched in two years
Flexen: Ok, maybe, but not a big name to make a list like this
Pineda: In AAA building innings
Karinchak: Demoted last year, currently hurt
Pagan: Solid relief pitcher, but inclusion on a list like this seems weird
Melancon: Can see this one, seems to always be on edge of breaking.
Wilson: Bust from what? What did people expect from him anyway?

I was hoping there would be some big names here. Lets go out on a limb and talk about why Cole or Woodruff or Kershaw or somebody will bust.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

Aroldis Chapman and Shohei Ohtani?

Left of Centerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

Yeah, I was looking at Cole as a possibility. He definitely pitched worse after the sticky stuff ban, then pitched poorly in the playoffs, pitched poorly in spring training, and has now pitched poorly in his first two starts of 2022. I’m sure he’ll still easily put up 3-4 WAR but I doubt we’re getting peak-Cole this year.

fjtorres
4 years ago

Cole is a good candidate to bust. It would shock nobody if the lack of sticky stuff reverts him to the guy he was in Pittsburgh, but older. Say a 2 WAR PITCHER. Playable but hardly what the contract expects.

EstebanMember since 2020
4 years ago

He was mostly excellent post sticky stuff crackdown until he hurt his hamstring. Spring training stats are meaningless. He had one bad inning in his first start, and was much sharper in his 2nd start, except for 1 pitch the Vladito (the 2nd HR and double were not bad pitches). He might not be quite as good as peak sticky stuff Cole but I think people are getting carried away by the stick stuff narrative.

kid
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

Yeah. There’s not much actionable here.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  carter

He’s not as big a name as Cole or Woodruff or Kershaw, but the more I look at him the less confident I am in Stroman. He’ll be worth a spot in a rotation every 5 days this year but the arrow is pointing down.

DDD
4 years ago

Dan, maybe I’m being a bit cynical, but it seems like your definition of breakout and bust is somewhat arbitrary. So, I was thinking it would interesting and more objective to define a breakout or bust using your ZIPS projections (e.g. a breakout is… maybe something like 80th (or 70th?) percentile or higher in your ZIPS projection for the upcoming season and bust is 20th (or 30th?) percentile or lower). What do you think? Thanks

viceroyMember since 2020
4 years ago

Give yourself some credit for Patrick Corbin phew, if Lester wasn’t awful then what would qualify as awful

TheBSharpsMember since 2017
4 years ago

I read the intro and didn’t see anything about relievers not being eligible for this list, so if they are, I’m going with Liam Hendriks. I’m a White Sox fan so I have some history with this. In the early 90s, Bobby Thigpen had his legendary season in 1990, an effective season in 1991 with some red flags, and by 1992 he was pretty much a guy you no longer wanted out there with the game on the line. Granted Hendriks at his peak was so much better than Thigpen ever was, but it feels like they’re on the same path.

nickolai
4 years ago
Reply to  TheBSharps

What is your evidence for this? Thigpen is totally irrelevant. Hendriks has put up 3 beastly seasons in a row, and his K and BB rates have improved each year. Sure, his HR rate spiked last year (likely partially due to the move from Oakland to Chicago), but his xERA and xFIP were career best and 2nd-best last year, respectively.

Is your ‘Hendriks is the new Thigpen’ story based solely on the results of 3 games he’s pitched so far this year? BTW, his velo looks great, and he’s got a 21:0 K:BB ratio in those three innings.

kid
4 years ago

These name are not very… actionable? The other lists were great, this one is a bit light.

bliss55
4 years ago

“I’m disappointed to say it, but I think [Chris Flexen is} more of a decent fourth starter.”

Flexen slots in as the fourth starter in a Seattle rotation behind Robbie Ray, Logan Gilbert and Marco Gonzales.

Is that decent and disappointing?

Last edited 4 years ago by bliss55
olethrosMember since 2020
4 years ago

I am pleasantly surprised not to see Adam Wainwright on this list.

JayGray007Member since 2024
4 years ago

bryse wilson sure feels like a guy who needs to be seen if their stuff spikes in a bullpen role. Seems like the early returns are good on moving Wil Crowe to the ‘pen.

LordOfTexasMember since 2019
4 years ago

Donkey Kong lives on, so your reference should be good. He’s even being played by Seth Rogen!

cregwalkerMember since 2022
4 years ago

Here, I’ll go bigger: last year’s AL Cy Young winner.
We’ve seen this movie with Robbie Ray before. Remember 2017? His ERA and FIP that year were strikingly similar to 2021. He regressed immediately the next year.

Baseball Analyzed
4 years ago

Karinchak is an interesting one, I think he can take over for Clase at some point.