Teoscar Hernández Bound for L.A. On One-Year Deal

Nathan Ray Seebeck-USA TODAY Sports

Like the wealthiest man in the grocery store, whose cart is so full of expensive foodstuffs that an extra block of aged cheese merely blends into the bill, the Dodgers have signed Teoscar Hernández. This deal allows them to fill the J.D. Martinez-shaped void in the lineup by replacing him with the other corner outfield/DH guy the mid-2010s Astros gave up on too early.

Hernández, 31, will make a sticker value of $23.5 million over his one-year contract, though — and you might want to make sure you’re sitting down for this one — the practical value of the deal will be lowered to roughly $20.4 million by deferrals. Hernández probably will not register as more than an afterthought in an offseason that brought in Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, and Tyler Glasnow. (I’m old enough to remember the 2000-01 free agent class being billed as: Alex Rodriguez, Mike Mussina, Manny Ramirez, Mike Hampton… and also Darren Dreifort!) But Teoscar brings necessary right-handed pop to a lineup that could have used a little extra power, particularly from that side of the plate.

Hernández is coming off a bit of a turbulent season in Seattle. The Mariners acquired him from Toronto in exchange for pitching prospect Adam Macko and Erik Swanson, a good reliever with a couple years of team control left. They knew Hernández was in his walk year, and that his impressive power and batted-ball numbers came at the cost of some pretty terrible strikeout-to-walk figures.

Seattle’s mistake, if you want to call it that (a more charitable description would be losing on a calculated risk) was focusing on what Hernández could be, rather than what he is. Hernández put up three huge offensive seasons to end his 20s: a ridiculous COVID-shortened 2020, in which he had a 142 wRC+ and 16 home runs in just 50 games, followed by two seasons of wRC+ in the low 130s.

A hitter who’ll swing and miss, but who punishes the ball on contact — Hernández was in the upper 90th percentiles for stats like hard-hit rate and xSLG his last year in Toronto — conjures images of Bryce Harper or Corey Seager. The Mariners gave up a useful pitcher in order to pay such a player $14 million over one year. Unfortunately, Teoscar at his best is more like Harper or Seager at their worst, and not only did that step into legitimate MVP territory never come, he took a step backward in 2023.

Those elite quality-of-contact numbers backed up into the merely “very good” range in 2023, while Hernández took more forays than ever outside the strike zone: His 38.5% O-Swing rate was the highest of his career, and his 5.6% walk rate was the lowest of his career. Despite playing a career-high 160 games, Hernández hit just 26 home runs and posted his lowest wRC+, 105, since 2019.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

When free agency came around, the Mariners didn’t even tender him a qualifying offer.

Silly them; Hernández ended up finding a team to give him more money (at least on paper, before deferrals) to play on a better roster with better infrastructure to help him succeed. If the Dodgers can fix Jason Heyward, they can turn Hernández into Stan Musial.

The Dodgers don’t need him to become a franchise hitter, to be clear; they already have three of those, in Ohtani, Mookie Betts, and Freddie Freeman (seen here photobombing a singer-songwriter at the Golden Globes).

But that lineup was getting a little lefty-heavy, even with Betts leading off and Will Smith in the fold. The Dodgers already added Manuel Margot in the Glasnow trade, which would presumably move Betts to second base full-time and figure into a platoon with Heyward. (Margot posted a reverse split in 2023 but is more normal for the rest of his career.) Putting Hernández in the other corner gives the Dodgers a legitimately impactful right-handed hitter.

Hernández has never had such a severe platoon split that it impact his ability to play every day, but he’s always done better against lefties than righties: 120 wRC+ vs. 100 last season, 136 vs. 110 for his career.

Current Dodgers’ Platoon Splits, 2023
Player Bats wRC+ vs. LHP wRC+ vs. RHP
Mookie Betts R 189 159
Shohei Ohtani L 135 196
Freddie Freeman L 174 158
Will Smith R 116 120
Max Muncy L 76 136
James Outman L 93 128
Teoscar Hernández R 120 100
Jason Heyward L 97 123
Miguel Rojas R 102 52
Chris Taylor R 111 97
Manuel Margot R 84 97

All in all, the Dodgers sticking a good hitter in left field on a lucrative one-year deal is a blindingly obvious value proposition for both player and team. Even Hernández’s down year in Seattle was worth 1.8 WAR. That’s not the kind of bargain that’ll get managerial efficiency porn written about your team, but it’s fine. Barring injury (and Hernández has no significant history of that), the Dodgers make out fine even in a realistic worst-case scenario. From an on-field perspective, there just isn’t that much to hem and haw about.

The financial side of it is a little more interesting, if only because the Dodgers (if only by reputation) are ruining baseball or whatever by trying to sign good players. It bears repeating that even with this glut of signings, the Dodgers are still only second behind the Mets in taxable payroll, and only $32 million ahead of the all-homegrown, all-under-market extensions, do-it-the-right-way Braves. And those selfsame Braves are on course to spend $38 million more than the Rangers, whose World Series doesn’t count because they signed a bunch of free agents. At least I think that’s how it works, from a normative perspective.

The Dodgers are one of only a few entities in baseball who understand that money is all made up anyway, and penalties that come only in money don’t have to impact the on-field product.

When the Dodgers signed Hernández, they were already over the second tax surcharge threshold of $277 million. That’s the one where all the draft pick penalties kick in. Anything beyond that only costs money. Especially because the Mariners didn’t put a qualifying offer on Hernández on his way out the door.

I heard once that people who don’t have their emotional needs met for long enough will convince themselves that they don’t actually need the love and support they’ve been missing. (As portrayed in the saddest scene from the final season of Succession.) And based on their budgeting, I’m starting to suspect that the Mariners feel the same way about making the playoffs. Either way, they couldn’t (or wouldn’t) risk Hernández accepting a qualifying offer, which as a revenue sharing recipient would’ve netted them a pick in the second compensation round when he signed with another team. Last year, Round 2C was picks no. 68 through 70.

The Dodgers, therefore, retain the two picks they would’ve lost for signing Hernández. Signing Ohtani cost L.A. their second- and fifth-highest picks, plus $1 million in international bonus pool money; signing an additional qualified free agent would’ve cost the Dodgers their third- and sixth-highest picks as well. Moreover, since Hernández has never been given a qualifying offer in his career, the Mariners’ conservative behavior gives the Dodgers a chance to recoup a pick in the 2025 draft if the Hernández signing pans out.

If Hernández hits, the Dodgers could drop a qualifying offer on him and receive a draft pick in Round 4C. In 2023, those picks landed from no. 132 to 137 in the draft, and each came with a pool value just shy of half a million dollars. For a team in perpetual win-now mode, like the Dodgers, every additional pick helps.

It’s amazing what a motivated baseball team can do merely by spending money, and how much the inaction of its competitors allows such a team to profit even more.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dmjn53
2 years ago

I few deals have surprised this winter, but I’m absolutely floored by this one. A swing first/swing second/swing third/think never hitter that’s a fringey corner defender is not the kind of profile I’d bet to last much into his 30s, and that sort of played out with a major step back at age 30.

I get it’s the Dodgers and they essentially have unlimited money, and they did fix a somewhat similar profile in JD Martinez last year, but man this is a hefty price for what I think is a limited upside with a Earth’s core floor

kojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

The simple fix might just be getting out of Safeco.

Look at Teoscar’s home/away splits for 2023:

Home: 323 PA / .217 AVG / .263 OBP / .380 SLG / .163 ISO / .288 BABIP / .276 wOBA / 81 wRC+
Away: 355 PA / .295 AVG / .344 OBP / .486 SLG / .191 ISO / .389 BABIP / .353 wOBA / 126 wRC+

Maybe he can get back to mashing now that he won’t have to play in Safeco so much.

3rdgenbruinMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

He had a down year compared to his norms. Hardly a major step back. He had a “normal” year for him on the road.

He’s not a fringe outfielder defensively. That’s like Vladdy at third or JD Martinez in left. Teoscar is much better than that.

And it’s a 1 year deal, not a 5 year commitment.

Dmjn53
2 years ago
Reply to  3rdgenbruin

-24 OAA across 6000 innings is not particularly good, and that’s with the bulk of that being on his 20s

frankenspock
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

You’re not listening to anything anyone is telling you.

PhilMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

He had an 81wRC+ at his home stadium last year. His away wRC+ of 126 is much more in line with previous seasons.

I think the upside is higher than what you’re thinking – especially if you buy that he really struggled last year because of the home park. He also then allows Chris Taylor to move around, and platoon for Muncy against good lefties.

I wasn’t in favour of the Dodgers signing him – but that’s because I assumed it would be a 3 or 4 year deal. A 1 year deal? Fine. And if it costs the Dodgers more money because he hits his incentives, even better.

frankenspock
2 years ago
Reply to  Phil

“We hope he doesn’t hit his incentives,” the Dodgers FO is saying, while also insisting they sure would hate to get thrown into the briar patch.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  frankenspock

I admit, I laughed when I saw the MVP escalators (there are like 10 dudes on his OWN TEAM preventing him from earning those bonuses)–but I love the enthusiasm!

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

It’s a one year deal. Who cares how he ages?

Dmjn53
2 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

Because he’s 31 right now and we just saw signs of serious decline.

And as I laid out, this is not a profile that ages gracefully

kojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Do you remember when Adrian Beltré had a 81 wRC+ playing in Seattle at the age of 30, then hit for a 140 wRC+ playing in Boston at the age of 31, starting a five season stretch of hitting for a 135 wRC+ or more?

TerryMc
2 years ago
Reply to  kojo

Comparing Teoscar to a Hall of Famer…yeah….OK. I’ll take the under.

frankenspock
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

No park in baseball suppressed offense more than Safeco for right-handed hitters last year. It wasn’t even particularly close; Safeco played like a reverse Coors Field. Also you’re talking about a hitter who is literally a single year removed from a second straight season at 130 wRC+ or above.

And it’s a one year contract, which is basically playing with house money, much of it deferred. Funny how the author takes great pains to clown on perspectives like yours, and then you blow right past it to start fretting about how the billionaires are spending their money.

puddleMember since 2017
2 years ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

I think this is about as negative a view as you could possibly have of this signing, and I think you’re ignoring a few things that put his floor significantly higher than “earth’s core.”

For one, the deferred money puts the present day value of the contract somewhere around $19m. Going rate for 1 WAR seems to be about $8.5m, so the Dodgers are paying for ~2.25 WAR, which he has hit in 3 of the last 4 seasons (2020 being prorated).

Two, last season when he fell short of that 2.25 WAR threshold, there were several factors working against him: environment and luck. His SLG was almost 40 points lower than his xSLG despite his hard hit % being in line with all other years. His away wRC+ was 126. Seattle just is unkind to some boppers.

Three, I think you understate his defense. It’s ranged from slightly below average to slightly above average depending on the year and the position. Just last year he had a 6.7 UZR/150 and 1 DRS. I think somewhere around average is a reasonable expectation.

Finally, it’s a 1-year deal. There’s almost no such thing as a bad 1-year deal, and now they could theoretically get comp picks out of it.

Yes, the swing and miss is risky and he’s on the wrong side of 30, but considering he matched the exact profile the Dodgers needed at the position that they needed it, it seems like a low risk, high reward deal to me.

Mike NMN
2 years ago

I’m interesting in the long-term impact of deferred dollars. I realize there’s an AAV that takes it into account, but with an expectation that CBT levels will probably adjust upwards in the future the penalty may be less in incremental dollars. Dodgers know how to play this game well, and if we celebrate the Rays running such a terrific organization to stay competitive, we might as well tip a cap at the Dodgers, who maximize their financial leverage to put a high quality product on the field.

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

The Dodgers are, almost literally, a team that runs itself like Tampa but with an effectively unlimited budget.

tung_twista
2 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

I hope more people understand that a part of the reason why the Dodgers were able to go on a crazy shopping spree this offseason was because of the financial “restraint” they showed in 2023 (that too many people were criticizing when it was pretty obvious they were saving up for Ohtani.) Yes, the Dodgers have a larger budget than any MLB team not based in New York, but no, it is far from effectively unlimited just as CBT thresholds are not some effective salary cap.

sterling62Member since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  tung_twista

I disagree that the Dodgers “financial restraint” in 2023 was necessary to support this year’s shopping spree. The Dodgers did not reset the luxury tax last year. In my view, the Dodgers made several poor moves last year that prevented them from having a more competitive playoff roster.
They let Bellinger walk for nothing instead of paying his arbitration salary of $17 million. They ended up replacing him in the outfield with David Peralta for about $8 million who had an OPS+ of 81 compared to Bellinger with OPS+ of 133. Both played on one year contracts that would not affect this year’s spending. Plus the Dodgers would have received a comp draft pick for Bellinger this year.
The Dodgers signed Noah Syndergard as their fifth starter for $13 million and he was ineffective before being traded. They passed on several better options at a similar cost including Nate Eovaldi, Wacha, Lugo, and Senga.
The Dodgers were in desperate need of starting pitching at the trade deadline when they acquired Lance Lynn instead of Jordan Montgomery. The Dodgers then lost out on Eduardo Rodriguez when they wouldn’t add another option year to his contract.
The Rangers made the right calls in getting Eovaldi and Montgomery who carried them to the WS title. The Dodgers opted for Syndergard and Lynn and suffered an early playoff exit. In the playoffs, the Dodgers pitched an injured Kershaw, a rookie Miller, and Lance Lynn in losing 3 straight games.
The Dodgers could have kept Bellinger, signed Eovaldi and traded for Montgomery last year, and still completed their offseason haul this year. The Rangers front office just did a better job in 2023 than the Dodgers and have a World Series ring to show for it.

PhilMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  sterling62

I doubt Bellinger would have had a 133wRC+ had the Dodgers tendered him a contract – seemed like he needed a change of scenery. But he was replaced by Outman – who was 3rd in RoY voting.

Yes, Peralta was poor – but Heyward worked out brilliantly. And yes, Syndergaard didn’t work out, but Tyler Anderson was great the year before. Its easy to say with hindsight which mid tier one year deal you should have made.

These are the starting pitchers the Dodgers were paying last season who were unavailable in September and the playoffs (either due to injury or legal issues)

Buehler
May
Urias
Bauer
Gonsolin

That seems like it would be one of the better rotations in baseball.

And Kershaw probably should have been on the injured list too with his should injury.

At the end of the day, winning 100 games was an overachievment and their starting rotation was in tatters at the end of the season. And if your pair of 8WAR star hitters collectively go 1-21, you aren’t going to win many playoff series, especially when you set a record for fewest outs recorded by your starting pitchers.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

I look forward to someone writing about Friedman’s career in baseball someday

frankenspock
2 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

The Dodgers have effectively exposed the hollow arguments of baseball owners claiming they don’t have enough money to do certain things well or competitively. So there’s also that.

Yet the average Joe Sportsfan sees what they’re doing and cries about them “wrecking the game,” when what he should be doing is demanding better from his own team’s front office. There is zero reason most teams can’t do this sort of thing (except, of course, that now that the Dodgers have shown the willingness to pay players what they’re worth in a way that makes sense for both parties involved while bring new faces into a pre-built winning environment, this will create its own momentum of free agents telling their agents to get them on the Dodgers, which is definitely something most fans of other teams don’t want to see. But again: blame your own local morons.)

Shalesh
2 years ago
Reply to  frankenspock

Man, you are drinking the Boras Kool-Aid, lol. The Dodgers have the second-highest annual revenue at over $600M. The Reds for example generated $250M in 2023 revenue. Even children can understand that the Dodgers have far more wherewithal than the Reds even after revenue sharing. So yes, there is much more than “zero reason” the Reds can’t sign either Ohtani or Yamamoto let alone both of them.

I wish the author’s “Money is all made up anyway” would satisfy people who complain about income inequality, but it never seems to.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
2 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

Agreed. The Padres tried this – it didn’t work!

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

Several countries come to mind that ran as if money is just made up. In one they ended up hunting and eating flamingos to keep body and soul together. (Look it up.) The others have not ended up well, either. One of them is on a Thelma and Louise run headed to the final scene.

Now, if that statement had included “baseball” ahead of money, as in “baseball money is all made up”, that is a defensible statement within the confines of MLB’s self imposed rules.

But out in the real world of working stiffs and feeding kids, money is not imaginary and baseball is something one follows to get away from the real world, so it is best to keep the two separate.

Matt GreeneMember since 2025
2 years ago

I think the real question is: what item in the wealthiest man’s grocery cart are you most jealous of?

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Greene

The cart.

david k
2 years ago

 the Dodgers are still only second behind the Mets in taxable payroll, and only $32 million ahead of the all-homegrown, all-under-market extensions, do-it-the-right-way Braves. And those selfsame Braves are on course to spend $38 million more than the Rangers”

This sounds like a stretch to try to justify the counter argument that the Dodgers are not spending like mad. Comparing the Dodgers to just a couple of other teams doesn’t really give a complete picture, much like cropping the top of a bar graph without showing the floor doesn’t give a complete picture and is intentionally misleading. The Dodgers aren’t JUST in competition with those three other teams listed, they are in competition with the rest of the league, or at least you can throw out a few of those not close to contention right now and say they are in competition with everyone else. For starters, consider what may be their chief competition in their own division, the DBacks. What are the total average annual salaries (forget about Ohtani’s backloaded deal, let’s talk his average annual salary and apply it to this year) for the entire Dodgers’ roster vs. that of the Dbacks? There has been an “unfairness” issue in MLB ever since free agency got started, but with the situation lately with local TV deals falling apart in smaller markets, the situation is probably more dire now than it has ever been. Can a team like the Rays or Royals (2015) compete? Yes, it is clearly possible, but not likely, and not for a substantial period of time. You end up with teams like the Marlins, who win one year, and then dismantle the next, and that does wonders for their fan base. Is that what we want from MLB?

The NFL is much more successful than MLB, in large part due to all the teams being on an even playing field as far as salaries go (yes, there’s other things that make the NFL substantially different, including a more limited suite of games that lends itself more to national broadcasting contracts, I get that). The NFL still has its “dynasties” but it also has a lot more turnover of teams that can go from zeroes to heroes almost overnight (see 2023 Houston Texans). MLB needs to fix this.

Dodgerfan711
2 years ago
Reply to  david k

The NFL is built around franchise QBs. Anything else is a lie. Salary cap is irrelevant.

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Dodgerfan711

It can be argued the NFL is built around non-guaranteed contracts.
No dead money in those budgets.
Those guys have to play for their supper week after week.

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

But that has created an even bigger mess of holdouts and players often being released despite still being useful players.

fjtorres
2 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

That’s not a bug, that’s a feature.
Useful in the NFL doesn’t mean what useful means in MLB.

Remember the strike replacements?

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  Dodgerfan711

The NFL is built around nepotism and brain trauma

PhilMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  david k

And yet soccer is the most popular sport in the world and the financial disparity is far far greater than in baseball – and aside from Leicester City winning the EPL in 2016 (and even then they were still owned by a billionaire), if you don’t have a big budget, you aren’t winning the league.

Interesting that you mention the Texans making the NFL playoffs almost overnight. Didn’t this literally happen this season with the Texas Rangers? They won the World Series losing 94 games in 2022 and 102 games in 2021. There have been 9 different World Series winners in the past 10 years – that seems pretty good.

(As a Dodger fan, I just say let the Dodgers have a late 90s Yankees or early 70s Oakland As run of winning multiple consecutive World Series first)

Lanidrac
2 years ago
Reply to  david k

It’s because of those differences like national broadcasting contracts that allow the NFL to utilize massive revenue sharing that mostly evens out the salary playing field, whether or not there is a salary cap in either sport. It’s just not possible for MLB to fix the revenue disparity to that degree.

slz
2 years ago
Reply to  david k

The problem isnt that the Dodgers have a ton of money, it’s that the Dodgers have a ton of money and are smart.

The Mets have a ton of money. The Rays are smart. No one is complaining about either of those teams.

Smiling PolitelyMember since 2018
2 years ago
Reply to  david k

The NFL players are literally begging the league to create even playing surfaces