The $17.8 Million Answer
Last week, I discussed a few of the qualifying offer decisions facing teams and players this offseason. Yesterday, we learned which players found themselves on the receiving end of a QO. What happened and, given my analysis last week, what are the potential consequences? Let’s take a look.
Received a Qualifying Offer
The Obvious Ones
Anthony Rendon, Gerrit Cole, Josh Donaldson, and Stephen Strasburg all received offers. I think I’m on fairly safe ground by assuming all four will be turned down and that none of these players will have their markets seriously altered or damaged by the loss of a draft pick.
José Abreu
José Abreu is the one player I didn’t address last week who I probably should have. I didn’t actually expect there was much chance of the White Sox making this offer. Abreu should absolutely accept this contract; Nelson Cruz was considerably older last winter, but was had just had a better season and came with no loss of a draft pick, and received just a one-year, $14.3 million deal with a team option.
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | .269 | .322 | .462 | 587 | 72 | 158 | 34 | 2 | 25 | 98 | 36 | 136 | 2 | 109 | -3 | 1.3 |
ZiPS suggests Abreu could fetch a one-year, $10 million contract, considerably less than the qualifying offer; that also doesn’t account for the value of the lost of a draft pick. I suspect Abreu accepts, lest he becomes one of the top candidates this winter for the free agent who doesn’t sign until June.
Madison Bumgarner
Madison Bumgarner was an obvious recipient of a qualifying offer, but he’s worth noting separately due to the likely consequences it will have for his next contract. I didn’t include Bumgarner’s projection in the previous piece, but given that Steamer just came out with a 2.1 WAR forecast for the left-hander in 2020, it’s probably worth demonstrating that Steamer’s not an outlier:
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | H | HR | BB | SO | ERA+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 9 | 8 | 4.13 | 30 | 30 | 180.7 | 175 | 31 | 41 | 171 | 100 | 2.3 |
| 2021 | 8 | 7 | 4.23 | 28 | 28 | 166.0 | 166 | 29 | 38 | 152 | 98 | 1.9 |
| 2022 | 8 | 7 | 4.35 | 27 | 27 | 158.0 | 161 | 28 | 36 | 142 | 95 | 1.6 |
| 2023 | 7 | 7 | 4.36 | 25 | 25 | 145.0 | 148 | 26 | 33 | 130 | 95 | 1.5 |
| 2024 | 6 | 6 | 4.46 | 22 | 22 | 130.7 | 135 | 24 | 31 | 118 | 93 | 1.2 |
| 2025 | 5 | 6 | 4.60 | 20 | 20 | 115.7 | 121 | 23 | 28 | 104 | 90 | 0.9 |
This projection is for a neutral park, which matters for Bumgarner more than most. Bumgarner is more of a fly baller now than he was during his best years and doesn’t throw particularly hard, which is risky in a park that isn’t death to home runs. For his career, Bumgarner has a 58% higher HR/9 on the road than at home and with nearly a decade in the majors, that’s enough of a sample to declare it a concern instead of mere noise. ZiPS doesn’t explicitly use home/road data for individual players but it does see Bumgarner’s tendencies, valuing him at about 0.7 WAR per season more in San Francisco than in a neutral park. When you take the value of the draft pick into account, I’m not sure that Bumgarner is an obvious choice over Wade Miley given otherwise identical contracts.
Jake Odorizzi
The Twins made the smart move and extended a qualifying offer to Jake Odorizzi. The loss of a draft pick for the signing team adds risk to Odorizzi’s decision. The ZiPS projection for the right-hander’s next four years (8.7 WAR) is better than Dallas Keuchel’s four-year projection was entering free agency last winter (8.5 WAR). The situations aren’t identical, but the experiences of Keuchel and other second-tier free agents with compensation attached ought to at least serve as a warning to Odorizzi.
Perhaps I’m being too optimistic, but I still think Odorizzi can get a contract in the four-year, $70 million range, even with the lost draft pick. I’d rather have Odorizzi now than Jake Arrieta after his final season with the Cubs and while it took until March, Arrieta still squeezed a three-year, $75 million deal out of the Phillies. If Odorizzi wants to roll the dice, it may not be the worst idea to take Minnesota’s offer and bet on himself to match 2019’s 4.3 WAR. If he does that two seasons in a row and enters free agency without any strings attached, he might be able to pass the $100 million mark.
Marcell Ozuna
The Cardinals gave Marcell Ozuna his QO and even though I don’t think his next deal will get within spitting distance of $100 million, the market for interesting, young-ish corner outfielders isn’t exactly deep, making Ozuna one of the more compelling options. I’d be surprised if he accepted.
Will Smith
I think the Giants’ decision to make Will Smith an offer was the right one. The question now whether Smith accepts and in this case, I think he should. It’s a fair one-year salary for an excellent closer and if 2019’s crazyball returns, Oracle Park is one of the safest places to be. Playing for the Giants will affect his save totals going into free agency, but really, how many teams are using save totals for evaluation purposes anymore?
Zack Wheeler
There was no trademark Mets unpredictability here, with the team extending a qualifying offer to Zack Wheeler just as it should have. It’s extremely unlikely that Wheeler accepts and, at least based on the ZiPS projections, appears headed for a deal somewhere in the five-year, $100 million range. I would personally have ranked Wheeler as the third-best starting pitcher available after Cole and Strasburg in our 2020 Top 50 Free Agent Rankings rather than Bumgarner, as Wheeler projects better over the next four years, in both their respective home parks and in a neutral one.
Did Not Receive a Qualifying Offer
The Yankees Trio
Suggesting that thrift will remain the watchword in New York, the Yankees did not extend qualifying offers to Didi Gregorius, Brett Gardner, or Dellin Betances. I still think the Yankees ought to have at least made an offer to Gregorius, who averaged 3.7 WAR in his first four seasons in New York. Gregorius will be just 30 for the entirety of the 2020 season and has to be tempting for a team with a short-term shortstop problem.
Kyle Gibson
As expected, the Twins did not extend a QO to Kyle Gibson, though the right-hander will still likely end up with a one-year deal. It might surprise you, but Gibson’s 2.6 WAR in 2019 was identical to his 2018 WAR. ERA-influenced perceptions are still a thing! Like Lance Lynn last winter, I think there’s a chance that Gibson is one of the best value signings for a team this winter.
Cole Hamels
I think Chicago made a mistake by not extending a QO to Cole Hamels. I know the Cubs have decided to do a whole song-and-dance routine about their so-called budget constraints, but they should have jumped at the chance to bring Hamels back so cheaply. There are no internal options that are better bets for 2020 than Hamels, and a better option in free agency will cost more. Would the Cubs be so curiously cheap if they didn’t already have the World Series win?
Rick Porcello
Despite my speculation as to what the case for an offer for Rick Porcello would consist of, I didn’t think there was ever a real chance the Red Sox would take this risk. With J.D. Martinez not opting out of his contract, the Red Sox may not have made the offer even if Porcello was a considerably better pitcher.
Wade Miley
Without a draft pick encumbering Wade Miley, I’d expect him to get a decent-sized, one-year deal in the range of $8-$12 million. Considering the last six weeks of the season, I don’t think he’ll get a multi-year deal.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Us Giants’ fans love us some MadBum but the perception was that the new (savvier) front office wasn’t going to sign him based on what he’s done in the past. Extending him a QO points to a little light at the end of the tunnel? Maybe he turns it down but will take 3 for $45M? The fit sure seems right, ballpark and all.
I’m glad someone is finally talking sense about Bumgarner. I would still certainly sign him if I was a GM, but his profile is really scary in a neutral ballpark and I would strongly prefer Wheeler.
I’m not so sure that Wheeler is going to be getting a contract like that, and I do think the QO probably hurts Odorizzi and Donaldson more than what Dan would suggest. Not because I think that’s how I think teams should behave, but the QO has had led front offices to behave in some really bizarre ways.
Concur, both Odorizzi and Donaldson seem like prime guys to be hurt by the QO … guys you’re just not quite sure about, and don’t need a ton of convincing to talk your way out of.
Will Smith gets crushed by the QO, and should definitely take the offer. Ditto Abreu, as pointed out in the article, and maybe Ozuna.
I’m also surprised Gregorius didn’t get an offer, that seemed like an obvious one.
Just wanted to congratulate Nick Markakis for being the first FA signing of the year!
I’m gonna need the article on whether the braves declining his and flowers’ options just to resign them to the exact same amount I’d going to be punished by MLB. It’s seems like a blatant circumvention of the luxury tax. Even if the Braves won’t threaten that level this year, you might want to set a precedent on that to prevent other teams from following suit.
For the Braves, that’s probably just an internal accounting and budgeting issue. The option buyout probably goes against last year’s budget and vice versa for next season’s budget and salary. In other words, it’s probably just a way for them to save some money against next season’s budget, more money for free agents.
Also why shouldn’t teams be allowed to circumvent the luxury tax in this fashion? It’s really just moving money between annual budgets. Who cares? Individuals, businesses, and governments do it all the time, even for taxes!
It’s beneficial for the player since they get the lump sum of a buyout today, so it’s a slight gain in present value. So it’s a tough line to cross. You don’t want to encourage teams to try to go around the rules, but it’s something the MLBPA might fight against.
I feel like you need to wait it out before calling the Cubs cheap for not giving Hamels a QO. You yourself note that better options will be more expensive. If they are not giving Hamels a QO in order to pursue one of those better options, then you can’t call them cheap.
Rickets has been on Chicago radio implying that the Cubs won’t be spenders this offseason.
Cole Hamels 2nd halfs the last 2 seasons were very different – tough to make a QO to a guy going into has age 36 season with an injury that may linger.
2018 : 81 innings, 2.99 ERA, .302 wOBA,
2019: 42 innings, 5.79 ERA, .381 wOBA
Beyond that, it’s become trendy to just multiply a projected WAR by $9M and declare that the right price for a player, but a little bit of common sense should go a long way here. $17.8 million is a lot of money, even if you don’t have to worry about dead money down the line. Anibal Sanchez signed for about that much for two years, not one. Lance Lynn got paid an extra $12 million or so, but they got him for three years, not one. Guys projected to be 4th starters (and yes, that’s what Lynn was projected as…my, how things have changed) are not getting a whole lot more money and are under contract for longer.
Steamer projects Wheeler and Gibson to have remarkably similar seasons. Gibson might make a great plan B for teams that miss out.
Someone said this yesterday, but that projection on Gibson makes absolutely no sense. He’s projected to put up 3 wins, and he’s literally never done that in his entire career, and he’s 32. He’s got a career best strikeout rate last year, but you would expect that to regress rather than improve, canceling out any expected regression in his home run rate.
I have never seen Kyle Gibson as anything more than a very mediocre innings eater and the numbers back it up. His 2019 bWAR, a rather pedestrian 0.4, is much closer to the perception that I think most knowledgeable fans have of him.
White Sox front office is truly inept. They trade Wellington Castillo and $250K of international money to the rangers to save $250k on Castillo’s buyout. Next, they offer Abreu a QO which seems to be at least $5 million more than he would receive on the open market. What exactly are they going for?
You gotta wonder what exactly is happening on the South Side of Chicago for them to make the qualifying offer for Abreu. A team with limited payroll space should not be giving 17.8 million to an aging DH. Heck, teams that don’t even have limited payroll space aren’t even doing that these days. The White Sox can’t really still be valuing players like this, can they?
I get it, they want to retain Abreu, but even if they didn’t extend this offer, I don’t think teams would be lining up bids for Abreu, with maybe the White Sox being the only serious suitor among them. Just an utter shock to see this happen.
Chairman Reinsdorf loves Abreu so Hahn has to be stupid here. Not sure why they didn’t just let him be a FA and then negotiate a still-overmarket 1yr/$12M deal since he’s already said he only wants to be a WSox. He’s definitely by far the worst player given a QO this year. This is a bad sign that they will tender Colome at $10M and Yolmer Sanchez at $6M since they seem to over-value incumbents.
I know what you mean, but the Sox have tons of payroll flexibility. I doubt Abreu accepting this has any really impact on any other money they spend this offseason. Only $14+mil committed, another $33ish arb eligible, plus this for Abreu; they could easily double their payroll if Jerry wanted.
$17.8M would be a big overpay for Hamels, unless there’s any reasonable expectation that he’ll be healthy next year. I don’t think you can. Hard pass.
Agreed on the good pass on Hamels opinion. The market for back of the rotation starters has fallen while middle relievers has risen to the same $8M-$12M per year range.
From a bigger-picture perspective, how did the QO value drop $0.1M from last year? I understand the mechanics (mean of top 125 salaries), but how did that mean decline when guys like Harper and Machado signed their deals? What happened to offset these increases? It seems like yet another failure of the MLBPA.
Yankees offering a QO to Didi seemed kind of obvious, because someone would likely sign him, but the QO rules also place the compensatory pick after the 4th round, if I’m not mistaken. So, if the Yankees feared that Didi might take a one year pillow from them, it’s not worth the gamble unless they were prepared to have him at short. And, if they thought they could re-sign him later in the offseason, it would be likely for less AAV than the QO. In any event, it’s not really a strange decision if Andujar comes back, Torres moves to short, etc… And $17.1M costs more because of the CBT
Don’t forget Urshela. That gives you an infield of Urshela/Andujar at 3rd, Torres at SS, LeMahieu at 2B, Voit at 1B. I see no need to bring Didi back under those circumstances. You also have Wade, Ford/Bird (maybe?), and Estrada as backups, and you could always sign some cheaper backup SS if you didn’t like those options like Iglesias or Hechavarria. Heck, Urshela or LeMahieu might even be able to fake it at SS to cover a short DL stint or something. The money that would go towards a QO for Didi seems like it would be much better allocated toward pitching.
And I’m happy for Didi, because he seems like a good and cool guy who can go get his in without the QO slamming his market.
The White Sox front office might prefer the bWAR assessment of Abreu’s value which is 2.4, quite a bit higher than FanGraphs 1.9. While I consider valuing a win at $9M somewhat comical, why isn’t Mike Trout demanding $100,000, 000 million every year, well at least $90,000,000, it is easier to understand Chicago’s reasoning. Abreu is valued as a leader in the clubhouse and when such luminaries as The Spiker/Tripper can hold up a team for $300,000,000 then loaf his way through the season, a few million to a solid citizen seems quite reasonable.
I think Luis Roberts arriving on the scene has a lot to do with retaining Abreu.
This is an underrated part of Abreu’s value to Chicago, which is that he’s a steadying influence on guys like Moncada and Robert (who as far as I can tell are perfectly fine guys but they’re younger) because of their shared background. I don’t know how much that is true, but it probably doesn’t hurt that they’re all from Cuba.
The White Sox probably intend to resign Abreu to a?2 or 3 year deal, and extending a QO and attaching the draft pick to him prevents someone else from swooping in and signing him to a similar deal if they wanted to. Not that the middling 1B/DH market is really that hot, but…