The 2018 Replacement-Level Killers: First Base

(Photo: Ian D’Andrea)
When it comes to replacement level, first base is a very different beast than catcher. In general, teams prioritize catcher defense and staff handling over offense, and even in this age of advanced analytics, there’s room to quibble over whether the available metrics — including the pitch-framing sort — capture enough of their value. As we lack a good staff-handling metric (catcher ERA isn’t it due to sample-size issues), there’s a whole gray area that, among other things, allows teams, particularly contending ones, to convince themselves they’re getting enough value behind the plate.
First base is another story. Offense is comparatively easy to measure, and the expectations for the position are high. A contending team that lacks a heavy hitter at the spot, or at least an adequate one, is bringing a spork to a knife fight. At this end of the defensive spectrum, it shouldn’t be that hard to find alternatives, even if they possess relatively clunky gloves; in this day of shortened benches, you can generally find a utilityman to fill in defensively at first in the late innings. With upgrades available as the July 31 deadline approaches, there’s no excuse for letting a Replacement-Level Killer drag your contending team down.
Among contenders (which, for this series, I’ve defined as teams with playoff odds at least 15.0%, a definition that currently covers 15 teams), five have gotten less than 1.0 WAR at the position thus far. That said, a closer look at each situation suggests not all will be in the market for external solutions (an area that colleague Dan Szymborski will examine). Between early-season injuries and slow-starting veterans, some of these teams aren’t in as dire a shape as their overall numbers suggest, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re out of the woods.
| Rk | Team | Bat | BsR | Field | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | Rockies | -7.6 | 0.3 | -2.5 | -0.5 |
| 23 | Mariners | 0.5 | -4.5 | -2.4 | -0.1 |
| 22 | Yankees | -6.4 | -0.4 | 0.5 | -0.1 |
| 18 | Astros | 3.7 | -2.4 | -0.8 | 0.7 |
| 16 | Phillies | 1.3 | 1.1 | -0.3 | 0.8 |
Working from the order of the table above, from the worst to the most borderline…
Rockies
As I noted in the catchers’ installment, eight out of 12 Rockies with at least 100 PA have a wRC+ below 90. While it’s understandable how the team could convince itself that the defensively sound Chris Iannetta and Tony Wolters might be adequate enough, there’s no fig leaf of an excuse to cover the team’s ongoing inability to find competence at first base, where Ian Desmond, Ryan McMahon, and Pat Valaika have combined for an 85 wRC+. Desmond himself hasn’t been quite that bad with the bat (.238/.309/.468, 92 wRC+), but his defensive numbers at the position are lousy (-1.7 UZR, -4 DRS), and at this point it feels like the Rockies are playing him mainly because they still owe him about $50 million, preferring a sinking ship to a sunk cost.
McMahon, a lefty-swinging rookie who placed 83rd on Eric Longenhagen and Kiley McDaniel’s top-100 list this spring, should at least be able to outproduce Desmond, but despite a strong spring training from the 23-year-old, the team has yo-yo’d him between the minors and the majors. The results have been grim (.211/.283/.337, 50 wRC+), but he’s hardly gotten a fair shake; he’s started just 19 of the 47 major-league games he’s played, nine at either second or third base instead of first, and never more than four games in a row. Meanwhile, whatever voodoo utilityman Pat Valaika used to bop 13 homers in 195 PA last year is gone. He’s hit for a 1 wRC+ (.137/.212/.211), which at least matches his home-run total in 105 PA this year. Say, what’s Todd Helton up to these days?
Mariners
Speaking of an ongoing inability to find competence, the Mariners haven’t gotten 1.0 WAR out of a first baseman since Russell Branyan in 2009. This year, starter Ryon Healy has bopped 20 homers, but thanks to his 3.7% walk rate, his offensive production is barely above league average (.244/.274/.466, 102 wRC+), and the wRC+ is seven points shy of the average for first basemen. And we haven’t even talked about his defense, about which the less said, the better (-3.5 UZR, -6 DRS). His iron glove has dragged his WAR down to -0.2. The top in-house alternative, Large Adult Son Dan Vogelbach, has hit just .200/.333/.323 in 78 PA.
The M’s do have something of a solution in store thanks to the play of Dee Gordon at second base — not center field, where they originally planned to play him — during Robinson Cano’s PED suspension. The 35-year-old Cano, who was on a Hall of Fame track before failing a drug test in May, is now taking grounders at first base as well as second, and according to general manager Jerry Dipoto, he’ll see time there as well as at DH when Nelson Cruz needs a day off. Cano has never logged a professional inning at first base, but even if he’s learning on the job, he should be an upgrade, at least if he can approximate anything like his line (.287/.385/.441, 132 wRC+) before he was pinched. Still, the Mariners will need depth here if they make the playoffs (which they haven’t done since 2001), because the suspension makes Cano ineligible for October baseball.
Yankees
It’s fair to quibble with the Yankees’ inclusion here thanks to the return of Greg Bird from a seemingly never-ending series of shoulder and ankle injuries. After he slugged .575 with eight homers in 87 PA last August and September following right ankle surgery, Bird appeared ready to take his rightful spot among the increasingly youthful Bronx Bombers, but the need for a second surgery in the spring kept him out of action until mid-May, and the Tyler Austin/Neil Walker platoon that replaced him struggled mightily. Bird has hit a modest .223/.324/.459 for a 112 wRC+ and 0.7 WAR, while Austin, Walker, and Brandon Drury have combined for -0.8 WAR in that capacity, and -0.9 overall. So long as Bird stays healthy, the Yankees are probably in the clear at first, but we are talking about a player who has appeared in just 142 games since the start of 2016, so perhaps some insurance is in order.
Astros
The Astros may be a juggernaut, but even juggernauts have their weak spots now and again, and first base is one for Houston. That said, as with the Yankees, this is a situation that appears to have shored itself up without intervention. Yulieski Gurriel underwent surgery on the broken hamate in his left hand in late February, didn’t debut until April 13, and hit a measly .281/.304/.368 (84 wRC+, -0.2 WAR) through the end of May. Since then, the 34-year-old Cuban defector has gotten his groove back, hitting .323/.357/.497 (136 wRC+) en route to 0.9 WAR. Meanwhile, versatile Marwin Gonzalez, whose 20 starts at first base cover the majority of those that Gurriel missed (J.D. Davis, A.J. Reed, and Tyler White have the balance) has heated up as well, with a 73 wRC+ through May and 116 since. Move along.
Phillies
In a winter during which most teams shrugged their shoulders and sat on their checkbooks, the Phillies were laudably aggressive, though the free-agent signings of Jake Arrieta, Tommy Hunter, Pat Neshek, and Carlos Santana aren’t the primary reason they’re atop the NL East with a 55-43 record; of that group, Arrieta is the only one with at least 1.0 WAR. Santana, whom the team signed to a three-year, $60 million deal, has played every game, but has hit just .209/.353/.400 for a 105 wRC+. He’s walking 18.4% of the time, his highest mark since his abbreviated rookie season in 2010, and he has 15 homers in 419 PA, a rate on par with last year and his career; however, the 32-year-old switch-hitter’s .204 BABIP is 70 points below last year’s mark and 60 points below his career mark; basically, the rest of his offensive game is being smothered by the shift. He has an 18 wRC+ when facing the shift as a lefty (166 PA), down from a 72 wRC+ last year, and a -4 wRC+ as a righty (albeit in a much smaller sample of 31 PA), down from 44 last year. Even including the balls that he’s hit over the wall when facing the shift, he’s still slugging just .349 under those conditions via Statcast. On the other side of the ball, by both UZR and DRS, he’s slightly below average defensively instead of being a plus, as he was last year (10 DRS, 5 UZR).
The Phillies aren’t going to punt Santana given his contract, but they do have an alternative at first base in Rhys Hoskins, who was defensively average in 27 games at first last year and was considered by scouts to be adequate if below average at the spot; by comparison, he’s been dreadful (-8.6 URR, -17 DRS) in 113 carer games in left field. If the Phillies aren’t going to trade for a full-blown first-base upgrade, they could instead add to their outfield mix in a way that effectively creates a multiposition platoon, minimizing Santana’s exposure offensively as well as Hoskins’ defensively.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Any chance the Rockies or Mariners want to trade for Trumbo? Trumbo in the Rockies could be fun. Or maybe Seattle could redeem themselves for trading him away in the first place?
Trumbo is wasted in Baltimore, because he’s actually pretty good at first base. For that reason, I’d love to see that too.
I’d also like to see Vogelbach and AJ Reed get another shot, somewhere.
Trumbo has not been good for a 1B this year. He has a 106 wRC+ (below average for a 1B) with a -7.5 Def grade. His ROS projections are about the same, so he’s an expensive below average to an average replacement.
So, he’s better Ian Desmond you’re saying?
He’s a -7.5 Def Grade in RF. I don’t know what he’d be at 1B. Tough to say because it’s been years since he’s played there with any kind of regularity.
Trumbo is too pricey for the Rockies with another year at $13.5M. I would think their more likely targets would be Smoak, Bour or Duda, none of whom make very much. Bour has an extra 2 years of team control over Duda and Smoak** and Bour’s actually healthy (unlike Duda) so he might cost more in prospects, but they’re all pretty similar hitters.
**EDIT: actually it’s 1 year over Smoak. Smoak has a pretty decent team option next year at $8M
The only other option out there that is both cheap and decent is Jose Martinez (if the Cardinals really truly are done with him as an everyday 1B). The other wild card out there would be if they wanted to take a flyer on HanRam.
The Orioles could eat part of his salary if it yielded better prospects.
I think the problem is that the Rockies don’t want a traditional first baseman. They want someone really athletic, like Ian Desmond, or Ryan McMahon. I can’t explain it either.
My guess it that if they call it quits on the Ian Desmond experiment (and I’m not sure what new evidence would convince them, if they haven’t abandoned it already) is that they’ll get someone else near the top of the sprint score leaderboards. Bour, Smoak, and (to a lesser extent) Duda are near the bottom.
https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/sprint_speed_leaderboard?year=2018&position=3&team=&min=10
while Colorado is #29 for the season at 1b, in June they were #8, and in July they are #19.
Desmond in June and July has 10 HR and a 140 wRC+. Why sometimes looking at season numbers right now can be dangerous. Yes for season he is .238/.309/.468 with a 92 wRC+, since June 1 he is .293/.384/.573 with a 140 wRC+.
Probably those numbers will make Colorado keep thinking they’re ok at 1b.
And if he keeps hitting at anything remotely close to that, they will be.
Not sure it’s the season numbers that are dangerous to bank on here.
start of season thru May 17- 42 games- .167/.213/.340 for a .553 OPS. .188 babip
May 18 thru today- 55 games- .294/.378/.567 for a .945 OPS. .341 babip
what is really bizarre about Desmond is is home/road splits playing in Colorado….
Home .729 OPS 5 hr 68 wRC+
Away .817 OPS 14 hr 115 wRC+
looking at it…….
that start thru May 17- home- -26 wRC+, away 74 wRC+
May 18-now home- 123 wRC+, away 151 wRC+
Why aren’t the yankees teaching one of judge or stanton to play 1b? He could then share 1b with bird (and play of or dh the other days and take over full time when bird hits the dl again), which would give them a slugger at first and free reps for clint frazier in the OF.
because they are good defenders in the OF. Picking up 1B is not as easy as it seems.
It’s not that hard. Tell him, Wash.
It’s incredibly hard.
This place is the best.
Part of the reason the Yankees want Bird in the lineup is he is left-handed and they want a strong left-handed bat to help break up the righties. At the moment they only have Gardner and Gregorious in that role, plus a switch-hitting Hicks who is better right-handed. Frazier adds another righty.
Also, they keep expecting Bird will produce impressive numbers if he can stay healthy, and between injuries they keep getting evidence of this premise.
This is shaping up to be an excellent series.
You would think some team could really use John Hicks. C/1B with basically league average defense. Useful as the weak side of a catcher platoon/part time 1B.
The Mariners could use him back.
The Rockies apparent disinterest in trying guys like McMahon and Tapia instead of rolling out the carcasses of Desmond, CarGo, and Gerardo Parra is one of the most astounding and fascinating things I’ve seen this year. Especially when combined with the fact that they actually called up McMahon and Tapia and then barely played them.
BREAKING NEWS
Pirates currently have edged above a 15% playoff probability
If they stay there I believe they are eligible for this series at every single infield position
The Pirates have too many mediocre starters, but they don’t have any starters under replacement level; in fact, they don’t have any under replacement level position players period with at least 50 PA.
The eligibility threshold for the series is 1.0 WAR for the position, though, and I think they pull that off, depending on the method Jay is using. (If you use the “as 2B” split they’re at 1.0 WAR, if you use the “2B-eligible” split they’re under–I think mostly because “as 2B” cuts out Sean Rodriguez’s worst performances).
Josh Bell has 0.5 WAR this year, so IB would qualify. The only other folks who’ve played first this year are Ozuna (-0.3 WAR) and Freese (0.6 WAR but only played 1B about 25% of his innings). So adding 0.5+-0.3+0.2=0.4, which is, last I checked, lower than 1.
Moran is also at +0.1 WAR. Not sure how that all works out with the other guys who have played 3B for them, but it gives me a sad, because Moran’s beard is +2 WAR on its own.
Yeah, first and third are definitely in at the moment. I think second just barely cleared the bar after Sean Rodriguez and Josh Harrison combined for eight hits, three HRs, and 0.6 WAR in 16 PA in the last week… but if they hadn’t done that the Bucs wouldn’t be over 15% playoff probability so it’s fair. Shortstop is pretty much guaranteed because that’s where Rodriguez had his -0.4 WAR.
Santana’s 2018 can be split into three parts: Through 5/20, 5/21-6/17, and 6/18 on.
Through 5/20, he ran a .189 BABIP, but Statcast says he underperformed his quality of contact by about 84 points (0.273 xBA, 0.189 BA).
Then from 5/21 to 6/17, he had a .324 BABIP but OVERperformed his quality of contact by about 83 points (0.213 xBA, 0.296 BA).
Since 6/18, his quality of contact has improved (0.255 xBA)…which strangely follows the pattern of him underperforming it by 83 points (0.172 BA).
Looking at the spray charts of his outs, this isn’t just a case of him grounding into the shift (though that is at play) – he’s also getting unlucky.
I don’t think his true talent BABIP is sub-.190. As a Phillies fan, I hope he bounces back a bit.
The Rockies absolutely blew it with McMahon this year. The re-signing of CarGo compounded the Desmond signing because it meant Ian would be playing 1B instead of in the OF, with McMahon getting yanked around.
That said, Desmond has produced at a .288/.374/.556 clip since May 17th, so while his overall season still looks ugly he has certainly been making up for lost time.
A trade for a bat at 1B would allow them to shift Desmond to LF in place of Parra, though, and that is the spot that needs addressing, IMO.
And give Tapia a shot at replacing Gonzalez
Bridich blew it a few years ago on CarGo. Should have traded him after the 2015 season when he looked like his old self after the All-Star Break.
Greg Bird does not seem like a very good baseball player. I am confused by the consistent excitement behind him. A lefty with some pop in Yankee stadium seems to be the only reason, but he continually plays not very well when healthy, and is seldom healthy.
You must not watch the Yankees much. Outside of a 6/60 stretch to start last year*, he has been well above average and was the team’s best hitter in the postseason** (near .950 OPS). He was also their best hitter in 2015 after his call up, putting up a 135 OPS+ (although that season was also cut short by injury, of course).
*Which you can’t take away.
**Yes, better than Didi, albeit less clutch.
He’s injury prone, and he can’t run a lick, but it’s not a stretch to project a pretty productive bat given his solid approach and plus power.
I actually watch the Yankees a ton and he looks like a 230 hitter who might accidentally run into 20ish HR only because of the short porch at Yankee Stadium. It’s his approach I hate that you called solid. He looked like a 280 hitter with doubles power in MiLB but he’s been a travesty HR or bust guy since arriving in MLB.
Career 10.8 BB% would be Top 50 this year and .243 ISO would be Top 25. Not AMAZING, but like I said, it’s not a stretch to project above average productivity. Not super concerned with a BA that doesn’t top .260 if he maintains those figures.
Soft Contact % is a very good 14.3% career and even lower this year at 11.9% (would be Top 15 if he qualified). Career Hard Hit % at around 41% again above average.
Point is he sees a lot of pitches and makes good contact when he connects, which is why I noted a “solid” approach. I think the accounts of his underwhelming performance have been overstated because of sky high expectations coming out of last year’s crazy spring, which was followed by a dreadful start to the season and subsequent injury. Those expectations were buoyed based on his strong finish last season, but that was of course followed by another injury late this spring.
Also has been perpetuated due to poor results from a fantasy baseball perspective.
I am nearly certain that wRC+ is massively incorrect in regards to Rockies. Now I am not in anyway arguing that their 1st baseman have been anything but bad, but more that they don’t have a way of accurately reflecting what happens when a Rockies player goes on the road. Nolan Arenado has a career 119 wRC+, whereas Brandon Belt is at 128 on career. Do you truly believe that Belt is a better hitter?
That’s a complicated question and I’m not sure the answer isn’t “yes”. Arenado has a big home-road split, Brandon Belt does not. Would Brandon Belt’s numbers look better if he loses a few points of BABIP but gains some home runs at home?
The point I am getting at, and it has been covered here before, but for some reason less at length then you would expect, is that Rockies hitters have the coors hangover as well anytime they go on the road. The immediate negative is almost as much as the positive was at home. Yet that is not accounted for in wRC+.
wRC+ doesn’t capture the Coors hangover because it shouldn’t, and neither does any other stat. It may not reflect their true talent, but that doesn’t mean they don’t hit less on the road than the team they’re facing.
I’m sure the answer isn’t “yes”.
Great series.
This series strikes a nice balance between data-driven insight, gold standard application, and the new fangraphs agenda regarding FA spends, competing now, etc.
It’s notable that the new fangraphs refuses to critique free agent spending or any trades made ‘to compete,’ no matter how inefficient and self-defeating: as spending money or trading assets poorly makes a team less competitive. Overspending in FA is now ‘good’ under fangraphs rebranding, so is trading a top position player prospect for a reliever rental, etc.
These strictures, seen at nearly all other major sports media outlets, make providing insightful content difficult.
Accordingly, Jay calls Philly’s inefficient FA-spend (which limits their current ability to compete) ‘laudable,’ while lampooning clubs that avoided the disasterous FA class as ‘shrugging their shoulders and sitting on their wallets.’ In reality, Phily’s biggest mistake in the past couple of season of rebuilding was spending poorly on free agents, and this ‘Phily set to spend huge’ situation is probably the biggest red flag for an otherwise very strong organization. The new fangraphs, however, would have loved Ruben Amaro, he always spent big in FA and traded later-for-now. The new fangraphs policy is attacks limited free agency spending and valuing future wins: especially for teams in baseball’s middle competitive tier.
Even so, with this new ESPN/FOX/CAA style content, it’s nice to see some of the smarter writers finding a middle ground: if fangraphs is going to cheerlead for every ‘move to compete,’ a comprehensive view of efficient moves that each contender can do at each position is some of the best possible content. I’m sure the suggestions will be outstanding, and will reverse the recent track record fangraphs has built of only praising and advising very poor moves.
The Jeffs, Carson, Jay and now Dave are obviously able to provide top notch insight, so this is a great new feature. The current trend of traditional scouting ‘eye test’ coverage, and ‘front office surveys’ is oddly regressive and broad for fangraphs, yet popular. This feature stands out as outstanding already, and is likely to join the fringe 5 as content that is still better-than-industry standard: a level of content that I was worried might disappear alltogether from fangraphs.
Top notch stuff, very reassuring and a good indication that fangraphs will continue to have top level data-driven analysis.
Don’t look now but the Pirates leapfrogged the Rockies’ playoff odds. I’ll bet Josh Bell would be on this list.