The 2024 ZiPS Projection Decliners: Hitters

The full midseason run of the ZiPS projections have been completed, and while the standings updates are always a lot of fun, they tend to move in a similar direction to our FanGraphs standings, so they’re usually not the most shocking. What I find the most interesting are the player projections — not even the numbers for the rest of the season (the in-season model is simpler, but improvements in the full model are naturally going to be incremental), but the ones that look toward 2024 and beyond.
On Tuesday, I took a look at the hitters with the biggest increases in projected 2024 WAR, so naturally, today, we’re focusing on the hitters with the largest decreases since my original projections and dig a little into what changed for each player. Sometimes it’s performance, sometimes it’s health, sometimes it’s a change in position. Let’s jump straight into the names, since I assume everyone reading this knows that ZiPS isn’t a cheeseburger or a hoodie. I’ve also started with the players who were actually projected to be better than replacement level in 2024 at the start of the season.
1. MJ Melendez, Kansas City Royals
2024 WAR: 1.7 preseason, -0.3 midseason (-2.00)
2024 wOBA: .334 preseason, .322 preseason (-.011)
This season has been a nearly unmitigated disaster for Melendez, and, honestly, the Royals as a franchise. Melendez has regressed across the board at the plate, outside of still hitting the ball fairly hard, but his bursts of decent power aren’t enough to support a contact rate down in Javier Báez territory. What’s even worse is that amidst an awful season for both player and team, the Royals aren’t even using him in a way where they’ll develop or learn anything about him. It’s become clear that he’s lousy defender in the outfield, but they’ve only given him seven starts as a catcher. While this would be justified if they were in contention, they were one of the first teams to have 2023 be, for all intents and purposes, over.
With Melendez’s offense in greater doubt, it’s increasingly looking like his only real shot at contributing is if he can catch, so if he’s not catching in the majors, he should be doing so in the minors. There’s no purpose to just sticking him at DH or in right field at this point; it’s a bit like going to a college that offers a major in crashing on your cousin’s couch.
2. George Springer, Toronto Blue Jays
2024 WAR: 4.2 preseason, 2.8 midseason (-1.40)
2024 wOBA: .357 preseason, .334 midseason (-.023)
Springer has been far from awful this season, and he’s still on track to finish the season with somewhere in the neighborhood of three WAR. But his offense has dropped off a bit, and he’s old enough that ZiPS is simply forecasting far fewer scenarios in which he gets back to his late Houston peak. You can make the argument that it isn’t that the computer is being too mean now, but that it was a little too nice at the start of the season.
3. Aaron Judge, New York Yankees
2024 WAR: 7.2 preseason, 5.8 midseason (-1.36)
2024 wOBA: .402 preseason, .396 midseason (-.006)
Most of this one comes down to the fact that ZiPS is projecting much less playing time for Judge in future seasons. There’s a slight drop in his offensive projection, but not enough that it’s driving the projection, and his 5.8 WAR is still the third-best projection among position players, behind just two National League corner outfielders (you guess!). This should not be something that induces any kind of worry. And let’s be honest: the Yankees have an awful lot of other things to worry about right now.
4. Kolten Wong, Seattle Mariners
2024 WAR: 2.4 preseason, 1.1 midseason (-1.34)
2024 wOBA: .313 preseason, .292 midseason (-.021)
I was actually surprised that Wong isn’t (even) higher on this list given that he’s hit like a pitcher for half a season. One of the reasons ZiPS exists and is useful is that it’s not subject to recency bias, one of the most significant biases in evaluating player or teams. But it’s hard not to be unrepentantly negative when watching Wong struggle this year. While he’s never been a real power guy, he’s just so rarely making good contact that it feels like one of those late-stage Ozzie Guillen seasons during which you’d wonder if you actually want him making contact. A free agent after the season, Wong will likely end up in a spring fight for a starting job somewhere.
5. DJ LeMahieu, New York Yankees
2024 WAR: 3.7 preseason, 2.4 midseason (-1.31)
2024 wOBA: .325 preseason, .305 midseason (-.020)
LeMahieu’s 2019 and ’20 performances weren’t likely to come again, but the Yankees would have been content to get his ’21–22 output with a gentle slope of decline. That don’t appear to be getting that; his contact skills are showing serious signs of fade, and he’s not the plus-plus defender he once was. I guess the relative good news is that this projection is trimmed down largely due to the evaporation of his chances to get back to his brief star-level peak; he still projects as a league-average player going forward. And as noted above, the Yankees have bigger problems to worry about.
6. Yasmani Grandal, Chicago White Sox
2024 WAR: 2.7 preseason, 1.4 midseason (-1.31)
2024 wOBA: .331 preseason, .311 midseason (-.020)
Is that actually Yasmani Grandal? I can’t remember the last time a player’s plate discipline blinked out of existence more quickly than his has. His walk rate this year is less than a third of what it was in the ancient days of… uh… two years ago, and he’s almost twice as likely to swing at a bad pitch as he was at his peak. I can understand and have talked to no end about the risk of players becoming too passive at the plate, but it’s not like his aggression is across the board; his increase in swinging at good pitches has been much smaller. Long gone are the days where his defense was a real plus, so that’s not going to bail him out.
7. Tim Anderson, Chicago White Sox
2024 WAR: 2.0 preseason, 0.7 midseason (-1.26)
2024 wOBA: .325 preseason, .289 midseason (-.037)
Anderson has been less gung-ho in his pitch selection than in years past, but it’s nothing that has paid off in a meaningful way. His defense is fading, he’s driving literally almost anything into the ground, and having clearly lost a couple of steps on the base paths and now in his 30s, the days in which he maintains a crazy-high BABIP may be behind us. If he were having his typical season, he’d probably be one of the most coveted players at the trade deadline, but as surprising as this would be to say a couple of years ago, I don’t even think his 2024 option for $14 million is going to be picked up (nor should it).
8. Jake Cronenworth, San Diego Padres
2024 WAR: 4.5 preseason, 3.2 midseason (-1.26)
2024 wOBA: .331 preseason, .319 midseason (-.011)
The decline in Cronenworth’s offense has been less dramatic than other players on this list, so ZiPS is still projecting him to get back to 2022’s level of offensive production. But the fact that’s he’s proving to be a mediocre defender at first base — most infielders that move to first fare way better than at their previous positions — puts a real damper on his outlook; the odds that he will be a top-tier first baseman have been much reduced. Given San Diego’s roster construction, the best option for the team may be trying to land a real first baseman and using Cronenworth more as a super-utility Ben Zobrist-type of player. His contract extension was probably a premature one, from the team’s point of view.
9. Robert Hassell III, Washington Nationals
2024 WAR: 0.9 preseason, -0.3 midseason (-1.26)
2024 wOBA: .273 preseason, .265 midseason (-.008)
Hassell wasn’t the biggest prospect the Nationals landed in the Juan Soto trade, but he was a former first-rounder; the expectation was that he’d join James Wood to make up two-thirds of the outfield someday. He posted a solid .299/.379/.467 line down in High-A before the trade last summer, but he struggled after a promotion to Double-A, then broke a bone in his wrist playing in the Arizona Fall League. His offense has not returned this season; he’s hit .217/.331/.308 combined at High-A and Double-A, which ZiPS translates as an abysmal .199/.277/.285 triple-slash. Hassell is still very young, but he’s a far riskier prospect than he was a year ago, and the Nats may need an abundance of patience.
10. Kris Bryant, Colorado Rockies
2024 WAR: 1.9 preseason, 0.7 midseason (-1.24)
2024 wOBA: .330 preseason, .313 midseason (-.024)
Back when Bryant signed, ZiPS thought the Rockies overpaid by something in the neighborhood of $100 million — and that was with a projection of five total WAR over his first two seasons. Right now, he stands at 0.2 WAR in Colorado after an injury-filled year-and-a-half; maybe I’m going out on a limb here, but he’s absolutely not going to put up a 4.8 WAR-second half. He fits in with the historical pattern of Rockies free-agent signings, in that they’ve always seemed to have the idea that when you sign a player to X years, you’re somehow getting their previous X number of seasons, not their upcoming ones. Bryant was a bad gamble that fortune has been especially unkind to.
| Player | 2024 WAR | Preseason 2024 | Change | 2024 wOBA | Preseason 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MJ Melendez | -0.3 | 1.7 | -2.00 | .322 | .334 | -.011 |
| George Springer | 2.8 | 4.2 | -1.40 | .334 | .357 | -.023 |
| Aaron Judge | 5.8 | 7.2 | -1.36 | .396 | .402 | -.007 |
| Kolten Wong | 1.1 | 2.4 | -1.34 | .292 | .313 | -.021 |
| DJ LeMahieu | 2.4 | 3.7 | -1.31 | .305 | .325 | -.020 |
| Yasmani Grandal | 1.4 | 2.7 | -1.31 | .311 | .331 | -.020 |
| Tim Anderson | 0.7 | 2.0 | -1.26 | .289 | .325 | -.037 |
| Jake Cronenworth | 3.2 | 4.5 | -1.26 | .319 | .331 | -.011 |
| Robert Hassell III | -0.3 | 0.9 | -1.26 | .265 | .273 | -.008 |
| Kris Bryant | 0.7 | 1.9 | -1.24 | .350 | .374 | -.024 |
| Luis Urías | 1.5 | 2.7 | -1.22 | .314 | .330 | -.016 |
| Austin Nola | 0.9 | 2.1 | -1.19 | .290 | .313 | -.023 |
| Jose Altuve | 3.0 | 4.2 | -1.18 | .347 | .359 | -.012 |
| José Abreu | 1.2 | 2.4 | -1.17 | .323 | .346 | -.022 |
| Diego Cartaya | -0.5 | 0.6 | -1.11 | .289 | .312 | -.024 |
| Jose Salas | 0.3 | 1.4 | -1.10 | .256 | .277 | -.021 |
| Juan Yepez | 0.6 | 1.7 | -1.09 | .318 | .337 | -.019 |
| Mike Zunino | 0.9 | 1.9 | -1.06 | .287 | .310 | -.023 |
| Rowdy Tellez | 1.0 | 2.1 | -1.03 | .322 | .342 | -.019 |
| Javier Báez | 1.9 | 2.9 | -1.02 | .289 | .305 | -.016 |
| William Simoneit | -0.8 | 0.2 | -1.00 | .259 | .270 | -.011 |
| Kyle Schwarber | 1.7 | 2.7 | -0.98 | .347 | .360 | -.013 |
| Enrique Hernández | 1.4 | 2.4 | -0.98 | .308 | .321 | -.013 |
| Austin Barnes | 0.5 | 1.5 | -0.97 | .273 | .309 | -.036 |
| Josh Rojas | 1.6 | 2.5 | -0.97 | .303 | .317 | -.013 |
| Giancarlo Stanton | 1.1 | 2.1 | -0.95 | .334 | .342 | -.008 |
| Andrés Alvarez | 0.3 | 1.3 | -0.95 | .275 | .294 | -.020 |
| Carlos Correa | 4.6 | 5.6 | -0.94 | .337 | .355 | -.018 |
| Anthony Rendon | 1.3 | 2.2 | -0.92 | .336 | .354 | -.018 |
| Starling Marte | 1.5 | 2.4 | -0.92 | .305 | .323 | -.017 |
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
I wondered if losing Pedro Grifol was going to hurt young hitters like Melendez. Seems like it’s in the pudding that MJ’s issues regressed back to pre-Grifol. Hears to hoping the hitting will snap out of the sophomore blues.
gaining pedro grifol has not exactly helped Grandal or Anderson lol
LOLZ
Surprised by Correa not being in the top 10.
Unsurprised by 3 Yankees being in the list.
Surprised that there aren’t more Yankees.
No way DJ LeMahieu is even close to a league average player at this point. It’s very sad to watch but he looks very old.
That Aaron Judge contract is going to be debated a lot in starting around 2028 or so. I think the Yankees basically had to bring him back for reasons unrelated to whether the contract was good value. You just hope that he puts up enough value so that when he’s injured in the last few years of the contract that you look back and say he was worth it. You just hope that “Judge being injured” becomes the default state in, say, 2028 and not 2024.
“That Aaron Judge contract is going to be debated a lot in starting around 2028 or so.”
Swap ‘2028’ for ‘this offseason’ and I am with you.
I think if he’s hurt in 2024 for a good chunk of the season the debate will start then. Although I suppose NY sports radio is an unforgiving place, maybe it’s already started.
I have always thought a $300+ deal for Judge was going to look bad in retrospect, even if I think the Yankees had to do it. I don’t think he’s going to be as hurt as Giancarlo Stanton at age 33 but at age 35 or 36 I wouldn’t rule it out.
Honestly the Judge contract is the one thing that nobody’s blaming Cashman for – regardless of how well it turns out, the Yankees absolutely had to do that. The bigger problem is that the Yankees not only have an atrocious offense but have no ability to improve that offense in any meaningful sense going forward. They’re not signing Ohtani. The only conceivable impact bats available would be Matt Chapman and Cody Bellinger – and a Chapman contract is likely to be an albatross from day one. They can hope that Volpe’s offense will improve, which is a reasonable expectation, but aside from that – their offense is terrible and there’s no way of improving it; that’s going to bother Yankee fans way more than whether Judge is on the D.L.
Most of the Yankees’ young bats (Volpe, Peraza, Torres, and the minor leaguers) have mostly held serve or look actively worse than they did coming into the season (Everson Periera being a notable exception). And without developing hitting, the whole thing sort of falls apart.
The Yankees have — especially under Cashman, but even before that — been a team that develops hitters and relievers, but buys starters (through free agency or trade).
What hitters have the Yankees developed under Cashman? Judge, Cano… you want to count Sanchez?
He’s been the⁸re since 1998, so let’s start at 2000:
Alfonso Soriano
Nick Johnson
Dioner Navarro
Robinson Cano
Melky Cabrera
Brett Gardner
Francisco Cervelli
Austin Romine
Gary Sanchez
Aaron Judge
Gleyber Torres
Anthony Volpe
Now we can debate how good these guys really are (though they are all above 100 OPs+ for their career), and how much credit Cashman and the Yankees should get for each of them. But that’s basically 1 solid big leaguer every other year on a team that never picks high in the draft and a fan base with very little patience for young players who struggle.
Honestly, that’s a pretty underwhelming list. Doubly so if you take out robbie Cano
I don’t agree with your list. The comment I responded to said hitters developed under Cashman. So drop Soriano, who was signed out of Japan. Drop Torres, who was developed in the Cubs system.
As for the others… Well, I grant you Gardner. Can’t believe I forgot him. Toss in Nick Johnson, too. He was a good hitter. Among all the others, who was a good hitter? Melky, but he did PEDs. Navarro? A part time player with a lifetime 83 OPS+? Cervelli, a player I really liked but who was a semi- regular platoon catcher in 4 seasons? Ok. Sure.
Volpe? Are you kidding me? He’s proven nothing to this point. The claim was that Cashman’s Yankees has been a team that develops hitters. I’d say the list you offered is pretty awful output for two and a half decades of player development.
Romine – OPS+ of 65.
Navarro – 83
Gary Sanchez – after 3 good years of his first 4, under 100 OPS+ for his last 5.
Don’t know how you thought everyone one your list ws average or better.
Being a Rockies fan probably feels a bit like Charlie on the MTA, where he got on the Rockies fan train and now doesn’t have enough exit fare to ever arrive at his destination or even leave.
Not featured in the writeup, but in the chart: I don’t understand Luis Urias’s career at all. Based on their minors performance he and Luis Arraez should be twins, but instead they’re inversions. Arraez is to Urias as Mario is to Wario.
The offseason after he was acquired by the Brewers he put on 15-20 pounds of muscle to try to hit more dingers. Just resulted in him getting hurt a lot. Don’t know if he tried to change his swing to hit more dingers as well but the results are not good.
When was the last time the Yankees finished in last place? It is gonna happen. I also see an under 500 team in 24. When was the last time that happened? ha
I foresee the Yankees managing no better than 4th place in the AL East for this season and probably the 4 following it.
The year was 1990. The year of Kevin Maas. They had no pitcher with more than 4 starts that finished with an ERA under 4. Roberto Kelly and Jesse Barfield were the only regulars who finished with OPS+ over 100.
This has been “let’s remember some guys!” brought to you by sandwiches4ever.
To be fair, they’re in last place but (1) above .500 (2) 4.5 games back for a wild card spot and (3) would be tied for first place in the AL Central. This is not like when the Orioles collapsed about 5 years ago.
All that said, Yankees fans are right to be worrying about what this team looks like going forward. They have a negative baseruns record and they are relying heavily on a few extremely talented but often injured stars (Judge, Rodon, Cortes).
Tim needs to be on sabbatical. Or FMLA. Or whatever you do with people who are having a mental breakdown. (Don’t know if it is all mental, but he’s certainly having some kind of breakdown).
Grandal completely lost his power, opposing pitchers are no longer scared of him, and looks like he turned to the brilliant White Sox coaching: “Swing at the first pitch – it’s likely to be the best one!”
But amazingly both Grandal and Anderson had their best game of the year last night(!)
It isn’t just that Anderson has lost a step. His power has completely disappeared. He was a 15 – 20 HR guy with about a .160 ISO. this year his ISO is .041 and he hasn’t hit a home run in 369 days, and counting.
I’m surprised Jesse Winker is not on this list. I know he was bad last year but I thought that was mainly due to injuries. He’s only 29. Thought he would have a bounce back season. I guess not.