The 2026 ZiPS Projected Standings: All-Star Update

The All-Star break affords a good opportunity to run a full update of the ZiPS projections, since the lack of action allows me, the system’s flesh-and-blood creator, the time to refresh every speck of data that ZiPS uses before new games push over my tower of dominoes.
The ZiPS projected standings are the product of a million seasonal simulations; there’s a lot of PC power and a unfortunate amount of linear algebra involved. In order to get a better estimate of the upside and downside of a team, ZiPS takes the important additional step of simulating the roster itself before it ever considers a single game on the schedule. To illustrate, in most of the million simulations, Yordan Alvarez continues to treat opposing pitchers in a rather rude fashion, and sometimes, he even wins the Triple Crown. But in some simulations, he’s merely OK, while in others, he misses time due to injury. In a small percentage of those runs, the injury proves significant and prematurely ends his season. When a player is injured in a ZiPS simulation, the computer fills in the depth charts based on who is left standing. While this isn’t a perfect approach, the overall effect is to give us a range of expectations for the Astros, allowing us to peek as far as as we can into the future until the future actually arrives.
Once ZiPS has a simulated distribution of a team’s roster strength, it simulates the results of the rest of the season a million times. Below are the updated ZiPS projected standings through the games played on July 12. They do not contain information about the last night’s Phillies-Mets game, but rest assured that the 2026 Mets are probably still doomed whatever happened. We’ll start our look in the American League, beginning with the East:
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Yankees | 90 | 72 | — | .556 | 53.0% | 39.4% | 92.3% | 10.2% | 93.9 | 85.5 |
| Tampa Bay Rays | 87 | 75 | 3 | .537 | 28.0% | 54.7% | 82.6% | 2.7% | 91.2 | 83.0 |
| Boston Red Sox | 84 | 78 | 6 | .519 | 9.5% | 50.1% | 59.5% | 4.9% | 87.8 | 79.7 |
| Toronto Blue Jays | 82 | 80 | 8 | .506 | 5.1% | 36.5% | 41.6% | 3.3% | 86.0 | 77.4 |
| Baltimore Orioles | 81 | 81 | 9 | .500 | 4.6% | 35.2% | 39.8% | 3.0% | 85.8 | 77.1 |
It might not feel like it some of the time, but ZiPS still sees the Yankees as a strong contender, even when it assumes that the earliest Aaron Judge can return is in late August or early September. It really shouldn’t be shocking; this team is second in the AL in runs scored and has allowed the fewest. ZiPS is a lot less skeptical about the Rays than it was before the season began, but it still doesn’t see them as being better than the rest of the pack, with their second-place standing due largely to the games already played.
ZiPS sees the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Orioles all finishing somewhere around .500, but there’s still about a one-in-five chance that one of those teams will break out a bit in the second half and win the division. They’re all nearly coin flips to make the playoffs as well, as the AL is pretty mid, and it doesn’t look like any team that wins 90 games is going to fail to secure at least a Wild Card spot.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Guardians | 82 | 80 | — | .506 | 43.9% | 10.3% | 54.1% | 3.2% | 86.3 | 78.2 |
| Chicago White Sox | 80 | 82 | 2 | .494 | 21.8% | 10.0% | 31.8% | 1.0% | 83.6 | 76.2 |
| Detroit Tigers | 79 | 83 | 3 | .488 | 17.4% | 8.5% | 25.9% | 2.4% | 83.0 | 74.7 |
| Minnesota Twins | 79 | 83 | 3 | .488 | 16.4% | 8.8% | 25.2% | 1.0% | 82.9 | 75.0 |
| Kansas City Royals | 71 | 91 | 11 | .438 | 0.6% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 75.1 | 67.0 |
ZiPS remains unconvinced that the White Sox are this good, but they’re certainly an interesting team these days, with strong spots on the roster that aren’t just me being nice about it. To go from a 41-win season in 2024 to already having 50 wins banked this year is a really impressive achievement even if they ultimately fall short of the playoffs. The Guardians’ offense is probably better than the AL-worst it’s forecast for when projecting the rest of the season, but it doesn’t have a whole lot of upside, even if José Ramírez makes a quick return from injury.
ZiPS, along with some of the other projection systems, was criticized this offseason for thinking that the Twins were merely a mediocre team rather than an atrocious one. Well, in a fantastic win for the forces of excitedly mediocre sunny optimism, Minnesota has in fact been a middling team this year. I certainly didn’t have “Twins leading the AL in runs scored” on my bingo card. But the pitching is very thin after you get past the top few starters and relievers, so it’s still fair to say that this isn’t an especially dangerous team.
The Tigers could be a potent force in the playoffs, as any club with the ability to pitch Tarik Skubal a bunch of times would be, but even with a 22-14 record since the start of June, they’re still in a bit of a hole. Being 3 1/2 games behind a playoff spot may not sound like much, but it is when you have six or seven teams in roughly the same position as you, most of which are a little bit ahead. I think that the Tigers will end up trading Skubal, given that this looks like a seller’s market. I liked Kansas City as a Wild Card contender coming into the season, but they’re too many games back, and have too many teams to leapfrog; they ought to throw in the towel on 2026.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle Mariners | 84 | 78 | — | .519 | 49.0% | 15.1% | 64.1% | 7.0% | 87.6 | 79.6 |
| Texas Rangers | 82 | 80 | 2 | .506 | 31.5% | 16.3% | 47.8% | 2.7% | 86.0 | 77.7 |
| Houston Astros | 80 | 82 | 4 | .494 | 18.9% | 14.0% | 32.9% | 2.3% | 84.2 | 76.1 |
| Athletics | 71 | 91 | 13 | .438 | 0.5% | 0.7% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 75.3 | 66.7 |
| Los Angeles Angels | 65 | 97 | 19 | .401 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 68.9 | 60.9 |
ZiPS still thinks the Mariners are the AL West’s best team, but it’s looking like there’s a pretty good chance that 85 wins will be enough to take the division, and that’s a number that both the Rangers and Astros are good enough to hit. This is one of two divisions in baseball where ZiPS thinks there’s at least a 5% chance of the eventual winner having a losing record.
A lot of people, including me, thought the Athletics were just interesting enough to sneak into the Wild Card race, but the 6 1/2-game gap they have to close is a lot bigger than it sounds given that at least some of the underperforming contenders ahead of them will play better in the second half. The team’s pitching has been about as awful as expected, with a 4.95 FIP and an ERA uncomfortably into the fives, and the offense, which was supposed to carry them, has been underwhelming as well.
The only saving grace for the Angels is that they’re terrible enough that the team has to actually realize that they’re sellers. When you’re tied for the worst record in baseball, it’s hard to imagine yourself as a contender, like the Angels appear to do every winter.
Moving on to the National League, starting with the East:
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta Braves | 90 | 72 | — | .556 | 50.2% | 37.3% | 87.6% | 9.6% | 94.7 | 86.0 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | 90 | 72 | — | .556 | 42.9% | 39.9% | 82.8% | 3.7% | 94.2 | 85.0 |
| Miami Marlins | 82 | 80 | 8 | .506 | 6.6% | 29.1% | 35.7% | 1.2% | 87.3 | 78.5 |
| New York Mets | 76 | 86 | 14 | .469 | 0.2% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 0.2% | 79.8 | 71.4 |
| Washington Nationals | 73 | 89 | 17 | .451 | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 77.5 | 69.0 |
Since the beginning of June, the Braves have gone 15-20, which has been enough for the Phillies to get back into the race, with the Marlins right there behind them. ZiPS sees the Phillies as easily the most dangerous of the three teams, and right now, Atlanta’s edge in the divisional odds comes down to the tiebreaker and the 5-1 record they’ve already banked against Philadelphia this year. Also, I wrote the word “tiebreaker” in an article about baseball, so now I’m a little sad.
The Nationals making the playoffs was always going to be a tough sell, but there’s lot to like about this team. ZiPS has always been fond of James Wood, but he’s now at the point where the system sees him as a top-five position player in WAR over the next five years. The Nats still need a lot more pitching to be a serious contender, and they could stand to fill in some of the positions around their offensive core, but they’re headed in the right direction.
The Mets are probably better than this, but even if they start meeting their projections, it’s likely too late for them to make the playoffs without a bonafide miracle. David Stearns ought to be feeling some heat. While a number of the moves he made that haven’t worked out looked quite reasonable at the time, and the Mets have had some real injury issues, at the end of the day, you’re defined by the results.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milwaukee Brewers | 93 | 69 | — | .574 | 74.0% | 23.4% | 97.4% | 10.8% | 98.1 | 89.9 |
| Chicago Cubs | 89 | 73 | 4 | .549 | 23.4% | 60.6% | 84.0% | 5.6% | 93.3 | 85.2 |
| Pittsburgh Pirates | 82 | 80 | 11 | .506 | 1.5% | 23.9% | 25.4% | 1.1% | 85.7 | 77.6 |
| St. Louis Cardinals | 81 | 81 | 12 | .500 | 1.1% | 21.2% | 22.3% | 0.9% | 85.3 | 77.3 |
| Cincinnati Reds | 75 | 87 | 18 | .463 | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 78.5 | 70.6 |
The Brewers aren’t yet slam dunks to take the division, but they’re in a very strong position and have the highest projected playoff probability of any team that isn’t the Dodgers. The Cubs are the team most likely to threaten them over the next two and a half months, but while the Cubs’ offense and defense are both elite gold status members, the pitching flies coach. They’re one of the teams I’m most watching at the deadline to make some crazy play for a Skubal.
The Pirates and Cardinals both remain realistic Wild Cards, though they probably wish they played in the AL this year given that grabbing one of those spots looks a good deal easier in the junior circuit. Both teams have real holes they could address at the deadline, but I’m honestly not sure either will be all that aggressive.
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about how the Reds still had time to get back into the playoffs if they went on a run going into the All-Star break. They did not do that, and have faded to clear also-ran status; they ought to be sellers this deadline.
| Team | W | L | GB | Pct | Div% | WC% | Playoff% | WS Win% | 80th | 20th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 100 | 62 | — | .617 | 99.5% | 0.5% | 100.0% | 20.8% | 103.7 | 96.0 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 82 | 80 | 18 | .506 | 0.3% | 30.1% | 30.4% | 1.2% | 86.4 | 78.3 |
| San Diego Padres | 82 | 80 | 18 | .506 | 0.2% | 26.3% | 26.5% | 1.1% | 85.9 | 77.8 |
| San Francisco Giants | 75 | 87 | 25 | .463 | 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 79.3 | 71.0 |
| Colorado Rockies | 63 | 99 | 37 | .389 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 66.5 | 58.9 |
Well, 2026 isn’t the year that someone’s going to push the Dodgers off the NL West thrown. The Padres made it interesting for a bit, and their bullpen has been terrific, but the team just hasn’t scored runs, and Michael King has been the only starting pitcher they can trust. I guess the Friars could go full 19th-century with King, where they tell him it’s OK to dial the fastball back to 85 and then start him every game, but I guarantee that he’d opt-out after cosplaying as Old Hoss Radbourn for two months, even in a lockout offseason. The Diamondbacks also remain a contender, but they’ll need to get some offense and a healthy starting pitcher or two, and I’m not sure they really see this roster as one for which you push in all your chips.
Logan Webb is better than his season so far, and he and Robbie Ray make a solid one-two punch, but the Giants are too far back to be anything but sellers this month. The Rockies aren’t a good team, but as with the White Sox last year, there are interesting guys on their roster, and their games aren’t all lifeless, 11-2 snoozers. ZiPS thinks they have a really good shot to avoid triple-digit losses, something they haven’t managed since 2022.
| To Win | 10th | 20th | 30th | 40th | 50th | 60th | 70th | 80th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL East | 87.4 | 88.8 | 89.9 | 90.8 | 91.7 | 92.6 | 93.7 | 94.9 | 96.6 |
| AL Central | 80.9 | 82.3 | 83.3 | 84.1 | 85.0 | 85.8 | 86.7 | 87.9 | 89.4 |
| AL West | 81.7 | 83.1 | 84.2 | 85.2 | 86.1 | 87.0 | 88.0 | 89.2 | 90.8 |
| To Win | 10th | 20th | 30th | 40th | 50th | 60th | 70th | 80th | 90th |
| AL Wild Card 1 | 84.6 | 85.7 | 86.5 | 87.2 | 87.9 | 88.6 | 89.3 | 90.3 | 91.6 |
| AL Wild Card 2 | 82.5 | 83.5 | 84.1 | 84.7 | 85.3 | 85.9 | 86.5 | 87.3 | 88.4 |
| AL Wild Card 3 | 80.9 | 81.8 | 82.4 | 83.0 | 83.4 | 84.0 | 84.5 | 85.2 | 86.1 |
| To Win | 10th | 20th | 30th | 40th | 50th | 60th | 70th | 80th | 90th |
| NL East | 87.9 | 89.6 | 90.9 | 92.0 | 93.0 | 94.1 | 95.2 | 96.5 | 98.3 |
| NL Central | 89.8 | 91.5 | 92.7 | 93.8 | 94.8 | 95.9 | 97.1 | 98.4 | 100.3 |
| NL West | 94.1 | 96.1 | 97.5 | 98.7 | 99.9 | 101.0 | 102.3 | 103.7 | 105.6 |
| To Win | 10th | 20th | 30th | 40th | 50th | 60th | 70th | 80th | 90th |
| NL Wild Card 1 | 87.3 | 88.4 | 89.3 | 90.0 | 90.8 | 91.5 | 92.3 | 93.3 | 94.6 |
| NL Wild Card 2 | 84.8 | 85.8 | 86.5 | 87.2 | 87.8 | 88.4 | 89.1 | 89.8 | 90.9 |
| NL Wild Card 3 | 82.8 | 83.8 | 84.5 | 85.1 | 85.6 | 86.2 | 86.8 | 87.5 | 88.5 |
The odds are lower than a few weeks ago, but there’s still a real chance that the AL has at least one team make the playoffs with a losing record. One or two Wild Card teams could be losing teams, and there’s about a 10% chance that either the AL Central or AL West winner will finish below .500. What’s more, all three NL division champs may end up with better records than any team in the AL.
Now it’s time for reality to mess up the projections. But, hey, that’s the fun part of baseball!
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
I think ZiPS might be a little slow on coming around to the Orioles being not so good and the White Sox being average and or just above that. But it’s interesting that the teams are kind of similar, with five or six quality position players with some deep questions on the run prevention side.
The White Sox are running nearly an entire lineup of players outperforming their AAA / previous MLB numbers. It’s going to wreak havoc on a projection system trying to nail the outcomes of all 30 MLB teams / all 1,000 players. All we can do is enjoy the fun of this season and hope this is who they truly are!
This feels right, but actually isn’t.
Murakami, Antonacci, B. Montgomery, and Junior Perez are rookies who had a higher wRC+ in AAA or NPB; while Benintendi, C. Montgomery, Teel, Grichuk, and Acuna have all had better MLB seasons.
Meidroth and Vargas are having their best year in the majors so far, so you could arguably include them. However, each had better seasons at AAA, and they’re both former prospects in pre-arbitration, so you’d reasonably expect them to improve.
Same for Drew Romo, but his wRC+ is 50, so talk about damning with faint praise. Edgar Quero was a nearly league-average hitter as a rookie, but was so terrible he got demoted.
It’s true of Tristan Peters, though.
Each season, Dan presents the mid-season player-based model (i.e., ZiPS-based) predictions, which I compare with my full-team performance-based (i.e., non-player-based) prediction model. In the past, the two models disagreed sufficiently that I have made “bets” on whether a team’s win would be higher or lower. But not for the past two seasons. I don’t know why. As a consequence, I will make only a few modest bets for this season:
My model also continues to disagree with his about the Brewers. In my model, MIL has nearly locked up the division.
Anyway, let’s see what happens! That is the fun of baseball.
As a side, but very important, note, I commend Dan for his presentation because a) the predictions are sufficiently detailed that they can be tested, and b) he includes error bars, something I wish more authors would do.
Pre-trade deadline, it would be good to get a projection of next year for the bubble teams if they don’t sell. Several teams have a “get into the playoffs and take a chance” attitude, even if their odds of making the playoffs are small and of winning in the playoffs are much smaller.
This would make sense if you have a young roster and are considering whether to add one or two expensive veterans who will be free agents in the fall, but it makes less sense for teams with a roster that includes several players who will soon leave as free agents or age out of their primes and few young players or prospects who might reasonably make a leap next year. Nonetheless, many will still hold on to take a chance.
It seems that the likely future for older rosters that aren’t serious contenders but hang on to take a chance this year will probably, at best, be to have the same long shot odds next year, but it would be great if a projection system like ZiPS tested this assumption.
This is a great idea. I think I’d extend it out two years if possible, but that might be a lot more work.
I have a strong suspicion that much like the Angels in previous years and the Rockies in the years before that the Giants are likely to go down from here and they just don’t recognize it. I think the team is going to have to spend a huge amount of money over the next two years to make the playoffs with Logan Webb and before Chapman and Adames get too deep into their decline years. If they just ride out the current group, they’re going to face down 77 win seasons or worse until some group of Gonzalez, Level, and Hernandez are in the majors.
I also think that the Twins probably should trade (or extend?) Joe Ryan and Trevor Larnach for some solid upper level prospects who can complement Culpepper, Jenkins, etc. I don’t think 2027 is looking good for them, but it seems like 2028 might be.
Very interesting article , thank you. I am not too familiar with ZIPS, and only beginning to familiarize myself with the projection systems and many other features, as I am a new member of a few months, but I really liked the article, and am learning. All I can say for now — awesome work Dan, nice to see how the future will look MLB wise very possibly 🙂
There is a lot to learn about Zips depending on how in depth you’d like to go. I think Dan’s done a few write-ups in the past specifically on how the projections are formulated, but I tend to refer back to this one: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-2021-zips-projections-an-introduction/
The tldr is that zips does individual player forecasts that are tied to estimated playing time. These forecasts are then used to simulate the mlb season over and over to calculate these expected win-loss records and the percentiles. I’m sure I oversimplified that, but hopefully it’s a primer!
Hey gydeme,
Thanks for that! That helps solidify my very basic understanding — I’ll take all the learning I can get, hah. All the different projection methods are so mind blowing — I’ve seen that link, very, very useful — appreciate you passing it on .
Fangraphs, and its info / helpfulness = The best.
Cheers!
I check in on the FG playoff odds often and am pleasantly surprised to see the ZiPS playoff odds for the Red Sox are almost 60%. I guess Steamer is low on the Red Sox or there’s some difference in expected playing time? At this point it’s anyone’s guess when Roman Anthony and Garrett Crochet return…
One quibble – in the AL the Yankees have allowed the fewest earned runs (fake), but the Red Sox have allowed the fewest total runs (real).
Yeah, but the Yankees have pitched 20 more innings. Lower ERA, FIP, xERA, xFIP. They’re both very close though, meh. 12.4 vs 12.5 WAR.
Just trying to correct fact mentioned in the article (it says the Yankees have allowed the fewest runs).
But runs allowed is a team defense stat. The stats you mention are all focusing on the pitchers’ contributions. Red Sox have had better fielding this year.
The Red Sox numbers have been skewed by the abominable performance of Brayan Bello. The emergence of Bennett has pushed him aside. Early has resumed throwing and Suarez is expected to return next week. The rotation is very strong with Gray, Tolle and Bennett and Sandoval provides depth. The back end of the pen is as good as there is in the game. Seigler has been terrific in the field and has done a bit with the bat. Gonzalez changes the roster in a positive way and Durbin has finally been the player the team expected. It isn’t difficult to get back on the duckboat and be hopeful for the rest of the season.
If the projections say the Brewers will win 93 games, does that mean they’ll actually win 100?
Brewers are +87 Wins over their preseason projections on the Playoff Odds page for the nine completed seasons going back to 2016.
This year they were at 83 W preseason on the Playoff Odds page, so if they regress off their current 99/100 Win pace down to the projected 93 W that would be an even +10 for them (which would be their sixth season in the sample at +10 or more & third season in a row).
During their playoff run going back to 2018, they have improved their W% pre to post ASB every season except for 2022 (where they dropped a whopping -.016).
2018 (.561 to .631 W%)
2019 (.516 to .592 W%)
2021 (.576 to .583 W%)
2022 (.538 to .522 W%)
2023 (.538 to .606 W%)
2024 (.567 to .585 W%)
2025 (.583 to .621 W%)
2026 (.615 to .??? W%)
Between starting from the highest baseline W% pre-ASB and some of the pitching questions headed into the second half I wouldn’t expect the Brewers to improve upon that pre-ASB W% this year, but I’d also take the over on 93 Wins.
If they indeed can’t keep it up and get to the first 100 W season in franchise history, I’m kind of hoping for 96 W which would give them an even +100 Wins over the Playoff Odds for the last ten full seasons.
The Phillies have a great roster on paper, which is what ZiPS is responding to, and I can see them catching the Braves.
But they have been pretty terrible so far and lucky that they’re not farther back in the division. BaseRuns has them as 8 games worse than their actual record to date. And they’re +6 versus their Pythagorean record.
As another interesting note, BaseRuns has Miami as the best team in the East to date.
Possibly?
Terrible is a bit extreme, but the Phillies have for sure gotten very lucky in close games.
But I think it’s also pretty reasonable to argue that this year they’ve been the most burned by batted ball luck of any team.
The Phillies are second worst in xERA-ERA and 20 points worse than 3rd place (though the As are 20 points worse than the Phillies!). They’re second worst in pitching BABIP (only a point better than Colorado) and 12 points worse than 3rd place (As again).
It’s not quite as far on the offensive end, but they’re 6th worst in xwOBA-wOBA and team BABIP (a good June really brought them up).
Maybe this is all bad defense and bad BABIP talent?
The Phillies do have a -10 FRV (which is still only 8th worst in MLB), and DRS really hates them. Doesn’t seem to warrant the extreme pitching results.
And they ran nearly the same offensive lineup last season and had the 4th best offensive BABIP.
Maybe this is too superficial an analysis and there’s some reason why their pitchers and batters really deserve these type of results. I’d love to see other ideas.
Worth noting that the Phillies were really just putrid in March/April and have been substantially better since. They were 9-19 with a -54 run differential when they fired Rob Thomson on April 28th; since then, Philadelphia has gone 45-25 with a +42 run differential. You can argue that they were lucky to even have 9 wins at that time in April, and that they haven’t been quite as good as the 45-25 record implies more lately, but a lot of their season-long metrics are being weighed down by their absolutely atrocious start.
Maybe more pertinent than the managerial change was that Taijuan Walker was released on 4/23 and Zack Wheeler was activated on 4/25. They essentially swapped out a guy who had been one of the worst SP in baseball for a guy who has been one of the absolute best since then. So there is at least one reason to point to a real change in team ability around that time, and going forward.
It’s no coincidence that their turn around happened after Thomson was fired, but it arguably had more to do with their next month of competition being composed of bottom of the league teams than anything that changed from his firing.
That was literally the question at the time of his firing. In was it really necessary considering the upcoming schedule.
The bigger concern is why they kept Walker for so long, because they were basically forced to with Wheeler out. Meaning at this point that have no leeway with their rotation when it comes to performance or injury.
But most likely had to do with the fact that they regressed from historical outliers levels in both offensive and defense BABIP.
It also, wasn’t that free a schedule. They got the Giants, Reds, Rockies, and As, but also the Pirates, Marlins, Red Sox, Guardians, Padres x2, and the Dodgers.
3 of the first 6 series were against bad teams, but I don’t think that’s like crazy soft, and then they had a run against better teams. Phillies were winning against (almost) everyone back then.
Also have to remember that Walker was a perfectly solid #5 pitcher in 2025 and basically only had 2024 as an unplayable year on his resume heading into the season. It wasn’t a bad idea to consider him potential starting pitching depth. It probably still isn’t a bad idea for some team to sign him into their org.
Walker didn’t prevent them from getting a different starter to round out the rotation. A terrible farm system, an interest in giving Painter a shot, and a tight budget are the main culprits.
It’s not quite as simple as saying they played good teams as well, when my point was more the immediate schedule after their loss streak is what mattered. The teams you listed first, all the bad teams, they literally played over the next 3 weeks along with the Red Sox when they were in their funk and Miami before they got hot. This context matters to my overall point, where their schedule immediately changed following that loss steak that basically got Thomson fired. Enough to where having a different manager wouldn’t make as significant of a difference as the schedule did.
They had Walker because they didn’t have a replacement for him before Wheeler came back, but even if he were respectable they’d still be looking at a massive cliff after their current rotation of starters. If he were anywhere near playable another team would’ve picked him up by now for basically nothing. Your pints are exactly what I was getting at about their current rotation situation and why they had to keep Walker while no one on the planet will take him now.
How much if the Phillies bad pythag is their atrocious first 6 weeks?
Curious if there are any month by month pythag splits anywhere
I’ve watched most of the A’s games over the last season and a half, and I’m starting to doubt they can succeed while playing their home games in a minor league stadium. Here’s what I’ve been keeping an eye on this season (as of today):
Offense:
Home: 118 wRC+ (3rd in baseball)
Away: 80 wRC+ (29th in baseball)
Pitching:
Home: 5.70 FIP (last in baseball)
Away: 4.18 FIP (9th in baseball)
They can hit at home but not on the road, and they can pitch on the road but not at home.
That just shows the stadium affects both teams, doesn’t it?
It’s tough to compare a team playing three games there and getting to move on vs. a team playing all their games there.
My instinct ever since they moved there is that the stadium was going to be a crucible for pitchers. I don’t think it’s about going out there once, I think that the repeated experiences of pitching there makes them nervous.
This is something they will have to deal with at some point in Las Vegas too, assuming they actually make it there. It’s going to be a lively ball 2K feet above sea level.
“it doesn’t look like any [AL] team that wins 90 games is going to fail to secure at least a Wild Card spot.”
Is this a typo? Because my estimate has been that 83 wins is probably enough to slip into the WC3 and the chart at the end suggests that 86 wins is pretty safe. Why such a high figure?
Its awkward wording. Hes saying 90 is a lock but used too many negatives.
Doesn’t look like a team that wins 90 will fail.
Easier – any team that wins 90 will make it
rubber armed
legendary endurance
THE Old Hoss Radbourn
… Rogering your wife during the seventh inning stretch…
probably mean NL west throne not thrown haha
The Nationals projection is quite a shocker. I am very surprised that a system would take a team that has played .500 ball for 60% of the season and drop them down a very low 25-40-.375 for the remaining part of the season. This seems like an unusual result based on the conservative way numerical systems operate with their strong tendency to minimize extremes.
Their pitching is brutal. I believe they had to go back to starting Zack Littell and Miles Mikolas because they don’t have anyone else? They have twenty seven blown saves, with the next highest team at nineteen.
Foster Griffin has been alright though, I can’t imagine what this team would have done without him because nearly their entire rotation of pitchers at the AAA level are hurt. They might want to try and keep him around for a few more years.
I have this wild idea that Brayan Bello would look very good in a Nationals uniform and might be available on the cheap. He was decent on Sunday.
He likely has negative trade value at this point. I imagine that since he will have another minor league option after this year they’ll hold him at least until they think they have fixed him so they don’t have to eat half of his salary to move him.
But if the Red Sox are willing to eat half his salary I bet the Nationals would take him. They don’t really have anyone.
Griffin has been unbelievable all season except for one start.
I came to say the same thing. Obviously they’ve overperformed and the bullpen is awful, but it’s bizarre that Zips has them as a true talent 100-loss team the rest of the way. Even if they sell at the deadline it’s hard to believe they’d be that bad.
I suspect everything looks much different if we won the series with the Yankees. We nearly won all three games.
I’m not sure that Zips works like this
I think this has more to do with pitching being more predictable for outcomes than batting can be. Even if they had the best offense in the league this team would be lucky to be .500 with how dreadful the pitching is. In fact that’s how their first few months went.
Tigers and Mariners hopefully make the playoffs because they’d have a better chance to do well than others in their divisions. Texas fully healthy isn’t bad and would be competitive. Boston needs Crochet and Anthony.
Of the contenders for NL WC3 Pittsburgh seems to have the best chance to win a series.
This is small beer as Dan’s projections are pretty much the gold standard, but I think ZIPS is a tad too bullish on Baltimore and Toronto’s chances in the AL, and slightly too bearish on Seattle’s.
Watch out for the Red Sox. I am writing this I watch the Red Sox lay one on the Rays. Bennett put up another absolute gem, one hit over 6 on 65 pitches, but the highlight of the game was the latest version of the return of the 1950’s game that I love so much as the Sox laid down consecutive bunts during the 6 run 6th. Both of these antiquated plays sent the Rays into some bizarre combination of spasm, as Fortes threw Narvaez’s perfectly executed bunt down the line, then went into some sort of catatonic trance as three players watched helplessly as Cheng’s hugged the line. Baseball can’t be more fun than this. LOL
A great setup man and a legit closer and my Nats are one of the best teams in baseball.
It would take a bit more than that. At least two decent starting pitchers two more bull pen arms for starters.
I have watched nearly every inning this season. With Williams and Irvin nearly back, and Littell and Mikolas both having eras in the 3s after following an opener, we don’t NEED more starting pitching. It would help but its not a NEED.
We badly NEED a closer and top setup man because we nearly always lead games going into the 8th. Many of our relief pitchers pitch well in the 5th -7 th innings, but then get asked to close and implode.
where would we be if Bennet, Gore, and Ferrer were still Nats? First in the NL East? seems quit probable.
It must be difficult watching Bennett look like Carlton the past six starts. It doesn’t give you much confidence in those making the talent evaluations.
They need something like eight new pitchers.
I guess most teams could use an another pitcher or two though, so let’s say they need six pitchers— three starters and three relievers. Say, Joe Ryan, Freddy Peralta, Jack Flaherty, Adrian Morejon, Mark Leiter, and Kirby Yates.
I think probably the wiser move is to try and retain Foster Griffin and then go for some older starters in free agency like Sonny Gray, Gausman, Pivetta, etc alongside some relievers with good stuff.
Dan,
The orioles are at 81 wins and the Nats at 73. I guess that contrived regional rivalry does matter to some people!
Love & mad respect for Dan’s work on ZIPS… but, yeah, also have to agree that using the word “tiebreaker” in the context of baseball gives me a slight twinge of sadness.
Not a fun season as a royals fan who had hopes of being the tallest midget in the division but for the second year in a row I’m still kind of finding it difficult to criticize the front office too terribly much because almost every reasonably available FA at positions of need has been awful and they would have been in an even worse spot if they tried to sign some of these outfielders etc,.,I guess a savvy front office would have been looking to sell as high as possible on lugo and wacha but I just doubt they would have gotten much of note. Selling Ragans was rhe move I suppose but hard to know how serious any offers were and if the return would have been like Duran+ then it wouldn’t have mattered anyway. Ill always remember the brief Ragans reign of terror on the league
No hitters in the farm due up in the next two years have a prayer of being league average players other than I guess Mitchell who isnt a game changer at all. Hard to see how they compete jn the near future. I guess a Witt/Garcia/Jac/Jensen core is still a possibility on paper but even if all four hit that would seem to be the bare minimum requirement for a decent team and it doesn’t look promising. I think I will just resign myself to enjoying Bobby Witt for as long as he is on the team. Honestly it’s a pretty damn good consolation prize compared to most of the last 30 years so I ain’t even complaining