The Apparent Price for Chris Sale
As I write this, Chris Sale is still a member of the White Sox organization. Based on the rumors from the last 24 hours, though, that might not be true much longer.
Sources: Legitimate chance of Sale trade to #Nationals. Robles, Giolito would go to #WhiteSox. Teams haggling over final pieces in deal.
— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) December 6, 2016
The #Whitesox did not come close to trading Chris Sale tonight but acknowledge the #Nats were very aggressive in proposals
— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) December 6, 2016
At this point, signs seem to be pointing towards Sale ending up in Washington, joining Max Scherzer and Stephen Strasburg to form a remarkable group of starting pitchers. There doesn’t seem to be a deal in place, but the White Sox asking price seems to have scared off most other interested buyers, with the Astros choosing to hang on to Alex Bregman and the Braves declining to put Dansby Swanson in a deal. The Nationals aren’t willing to include Trea Turner, but they have enough other highly valued assets to get the White Sox interested, and right now, it seems like the smart money is on the two teams completing a deal for Sale that would net Chicago Lucas Giolito, Victor Robles, and some other stuff.
I have to say, though, from my perspective, this feels like a bit of an underwhelming return for Chicago. Depending on what the other stuff is, it seems possible that Sale is going to command not that much more now than Shelby Miller did a year ago.
The Miller trade was, of course, a disaster, so no one is looking to make that kind of deal again. But the negative reception to that trade was mostly based around the idea that the Diamondbacks paid a price for an ace but got a mid-rotation starter. The headline on Jeff Sullivan’s post after the deal was reported was “Diamondbacks Pay For An Ace, Get Shelby Miller“. If they had paid that price for an actual ace, the reaction wouldn’t have been as extreme; it would have been an interesting discussion of whether elite starting pitchers are worth that level of long-term value.
But Chris Sale is an actual ace. He’s legitimately one of the best pitchers on the planet, and he has the same number of years of control as Miller did, at salaries not all that different from what Miller would have gotten in arbitration had he pitched as well as Arizona hoped. Sale is one of the most valuable players in the game, combining elite performance with a well-below market contract.
As I argued last week, the White Sox were probably going to have to accept a deal of not-quite-ready big league pieces, as one of the big problems in the Miller deal was that losing Inciarte meant that the Diamondbacks didn’t really even improve in the short-term. But in writing that piece, I thought the White Sox would be able to command a monstrous return of further away guys, essentially just picking from whatever they wanted that wasn’t Turner, Bregman, or Swanson.
Giolito and Robles are quite valuable, of course. By Baseball America’s midseason ratings, they were the #4 and #13 prospects in baseball, with Giolito ranking ahead of Turner, Bregman, and Swanson. If you still see Giolito as that kind of player, then he’s the big get in this deal, and Robles is a great second piece, and by prospect valuations, those guys would be worth something like $130 million between them, about what we eyeballed Sale’s value at back in July.
But I’m with Jeff Sullivan in being somewhat skeptical of whether Giolito’s name value is matched by his actual expected future value. From Jeff’s piece this morning, which you really need to read.
The prized curveball still has plenty of depth, but Giolito wasn’t spotting it well with the Nationals. The changeup is a distant third pitch, and while Giolito used to get his fastball close to triple digits, it just spent the bulk of its time around 93-94. For a four-seamer, it was flat, and Statcast didn’t yield an encouraging spin rate. There is no two-seamer complement. The four-seamer is the fastball, and it wasn’t a good primary pitch. It has to be better, and it could get better, but this was supposed to be the carrying tool.
Giolito is currently a stuff-over-results prospect, except the stuff didn’t actually seem exceptional in the second half of the year. Yeah, it’s easy to point to Gerrit Cole and Aaron Sanchez as reminders that talent can trump underwhelming minor league performance, but there’s a non-zero chance that Giolito could be more on the Archie Bradley path instead. Command hasn’t been Giolito’s thing, and if the stuff is just good and not great, well, that’s not really the guy I want as the centerpiece of my Chris Sale trade.
Of course, the White Sox might be really high on Robles; he’s a 19-year-old who already held his own in high-A and apparently has superstar upside. Perhaps Robles is the #1 piece from Chicago’s perspective, and they see Giolito as an upside play that could help them win the deal in a big way if he pans out alongside Robles. If you’re looking long-term, Robles is a great target, since the eventual upside could justify the wait. But with waiting comes risk, and lots of guys who looked great at 19 never get better enough to live up to the potential.
In both Giolito and Robles, the White Sox would be getting significant high-risk prospects. Perhaps the other stuff in the deal will also be of significant value, and perhaps be a little more certain in terms of expected production, even if it doesn’t come with the same upside. I’m not trying to pass judgment on a trade that hasn’t even been agreed to, when the rest of the stuff in the deal could easily explain why the White Sox might see this as the best deal on the table.
But this summer, when speculating about possible deals for Sale, I was suggesting packages like Julio Urias and Cody Bellinger, Andrew Benintendi and Rafael Devers, or Joey Gallo, Lewis Brinson, and Luis Ortiz. Sale is worth less now than he was over the summer — the White Sox bet on him increasing in value this winter with more bidders in play was always a weird one, since the acquiring time is now getting one fewer pennant race to utilize Sale in — but I personally don’t see Giolito and Robles as being the equivalent of any of those packages.
So, in this reported deal, the other stuff might really matter. It seems like the frontline names might not be quite what we thought they might be, so the White Sox are going to have to get significant quantity to make this type of deal worth doing. If the other stuff that might end up in the deal ends up being more Aaron Blair than Ender Inciarte, well, then the White Sox will be betting big on Giolito living up to the potential people have been praising him for. I don’t know how comfortable I’d be making that kind of bet, especially if it was the bet that made me give up Chris Sale.
But as I’ve written before, the trend in reactions to star player trades has been to think the team giving up the best player didn’t get enough, and it’s happened often enough that the issue may be our expectations, not a failure of the seller to correctly exchange their player in exchange for proper value. While it remains easy to believe that star players are worth emptying the farm for, teams continue to place higher and higher value on young talent, and Miller deal aside, we just don’t see teams giving up the kinds of dramatic returns that get speculated about.
The White Sox have been listening to offers on Sale for so long that I’m sure they know what the market for him actually looks like. If it’s Giolito, Robles, and some other stuff, that’s less than I expected it would be, but maybe the other stuff is going to be really valuable. Or maybe, once again, it could be a reminder that teams put more similar valuations on stars and prospects than we often are willing to believe.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
If any of those prospect packages had been available last summer I don’t think we would be having this conversation. Which I guess supports your conclusion that teams value prospects and stars more equally then we would expect.
In reading Sullivan’s piece, I kept thinking “Then why would he be the centerpiece in a trade for Sale?”. This validates that, although Dave’s note that the prize for Chicago might be Robles, in which case it makes a little more sense.
It’s a little tricky, though, as there aren’t many suitors for Chicago to deal with for someone as valuable as Sale, and if they want to go into rebuild mode, they don’t have a lot of partners that will get into a bidding war; it essentially comes down to whether Chicago would rather hold onto Sale and deal at the deadline, or accept the best offer they can get from Washington, at this point. The market isn’t thick enough for this to work the way normal trade scenarios do: the selling team just finds the best price it can get for a prized asset.
Exactly. If they want to rebuild they may have to accept less than full value for Sale. Less than full value for Sale is still better for the franchise than keeping Sale and continuing to lose. They can’t expect to get better offers down the line either, when sale has less time left on his contract.
Similar thoughts as Scott too. White Sox need quality and quantity in a deal with Sale. It makes no sense for the Sox to trade Sale for Turner and a lower-level prospect. They’d be in the same situation as they are with Sale. As a White Sox fan, I am just glad that a potential deal is making the rounds on twitter as it puts a little more pressure for Red Sox or Dodgers to step up to the plate. Hahn: “Okay, Nationals have offered Giolito/Robles plus other key pieces. What offer can you make that beats that?” Before now, nothing seemed imminent so Red Sox/Dodgers could just wait in the wings without making much of a push.
Sale is a declining asset, which forces the issue from the Sox perspective. Performance being steady in 2017, his value decreases simply with the passage of time. If they wait until the trade deadline, they will get prospects rather than MLB-proven players because a contending team won’t be detracting from their playoff run by giving up starters. If they wait until next winter, then an acquiring party would have lost 33% of the amount of team control. Two years of control pales in comparison to three years of control. Of course, there is always the risk of injury, which would substantially kill his value and scuttle a major part of the rebuild plan.
Personally, I think Robles is the centerpiece of the deal. If Robles is promoted to AA and continues his progression in 2017, the Nats would probably list him as untouchable next winter in anticipation of the post-Harper years.
If Hahn doesn’t get an MLB-ready game-changer, he’s gonna get laughed out of Chicago. They don’t need to trade him now, if they can’t get fair value, wait for the trade deadline. This time knowing full well you plan on trading him. In the meantime, you can work on trading Abreu, Frazier, Melky etc and still have a nice crop of youngsters to start your rebuild.
It really turns on your evaluation of Giolito. If you think he’s legitimately the #4 prospect in baseball, then two top 15 prospects and some other stuff for three seasons of Chris Sale (which Jeff estimated to be worth about $85 mil in surplus value earlier this off-season) is a solid return. You aren’t getting six years of Swanson or Bregman for Sale, which is why the Astros and Braves bowed out.
Of course the deal is not consummated yet so anything is possible but it’s good to see this contrition piece here. Some of the conjecture about trade value recently has seemed a little off the wall. That said, there is also some overreaction to Giolito’s normal adjustment to the big leagues. Just bc he didn’t blow everyone off the table a la Noah Syndergaard right out of the gate doesn’t mean his future projections are suddenly worthless. Giolito and Robles fronting a package is pretty huge and that doesn’t include what will prob be Roark or Joe Ross added plus most likely another interesting prospect or two.
This deal is not done and will likely include other stuff that makes more sense to some. That said, a Giolito and Robles fronted package is nothing to stick one’s nose up at. Teams simply aren’t giving up potential cheap cornerstone players (Bregman, Turner, Moncada) esp to net arms. We knew that the DBs giving up Swanson was the anomaly, not the template.
“Teams simply aren’t giving up potential cheap cornerstone players (Bregman, Turner, Moncada) esp to net arms.” Lol
Doh! Well, leave it to Dombrowski. Having said that, I’m not sure why some think Moncada/Kopech is clearly superior to Giolito/Robles.
And of course roping the Red Sox into negotiations only helps ratchet the price up for the ChiSox. Could be they end up getting more from the RedSox. There was a rumbling last nite that Moncada wasn’t as untouchable as some had thought.
So there you go… if they can get Moncada that could be the piece that puts it over for Chicago. I would be surprised if the Sox deal Moncada for a SP esp given the rotation they already have.
Let’s see where it goes.
Watch Melky Cab goes in the deal.
“Ken Rosenthal ?@Ken_Rosenthal 3m3 minutes ago
BREAKING: Sale to #RedSox. Moncada, Kopech and two other prospects to #WhiteSox.”
Well, that made this article even more pointless.
Big difference between “now outdated” and “pointless.”
The premise was flawed. (paraphrasing) “This partially rumored trade is underwhelming, therefore the White Sox aren’t getting enough for Sale/aren’t getting as much as Miller fetched.” Couple of hours later, it was emphatically proven wrong.
Cameron even pats himself on the back in the Sale piece for predicting the return for Sale months ago, even while in this piece saying the White Sox would never get that return. In that piece: “But yeah, this is more what we thought Sale would command. ” He quotes multiple other pieces he wrote about Sale, but not this one. So why write *this* one? I stand by pointless.
I don’t really see Dave as being proven wrong here..more like, he was proven right. The Sox got more for Sale than the deal in this article, because added up, the deal in this article didn’t really make a ton of sense for Chicago.
He even says “I thought the White Sox would be able to command a monstrous return of further away guys”. Which they did.
And there you go. Moncada and Kopech and stuff for Sale.
Is that better than Giolito and Robles ++ ? Could be. Moncada is the #1 prospect in baseball and the ChiSox prob preferred to have a position player headline it.
I think that’s it. TINSTAAPP, and the ChiSox need to minimize risk where possible. It’s not like Kopech doesn’t have a decent ceiling either.
Well they definitely did not minimize risk, as Moncada and Kopech are both high risk/high reward prospects.
the trend in reactions to star player trades has been to think the team giving up the best player didn’t get enough
Has it? I’m so used to hearing about how precious the prospects are and how the star is Expensive and one of the few out there Aging.
Obviously Sale is going to the Red Sox instead, but I strongly disagree about a Robles-Giolito package being underwhelming and “not that much more” than what Shelby Miller fetched. I understand the concerns about Giolito after his initial struggles, but you’re still talking about the only young starter with two potential 70 pitches. Meanwhile Robles is dynamite. I would take Robles alone over Swanson every day of the week and twice on Sundays. He is an extremely exciting player with a very high floor and a higher ceiling than Swanson. If the reports of the Nationals offering Giolito-Robles are true, then in my view the White Sox made a huge mistake by choosing Moncada-Kopech instead. Kopech has even more command questions than Giolito without an elite secondary pitch, and while Moncada’s ceiling is higher than Robles, the swing and miss gives me pause.
Tend to agree that this isn’t a clearly better package than one led by Giolito/Robles but I understand the perception and why the ChiSox pulled the trigger.
Looks like Red Sox, not Nats. How do you assess this trade, Dave?