The Changes Byron Buxton Has and Hasn’t Made

Byron Buxton’s demotion to Triple-A Rochester on Sunday brings the tally to four demotions to Triple-A Rochester more than fans of the Minnesota Twins hoped to witness their top prospect endure once he made his major-league debut on June 14, 2015. Buxton is headed to the minors to do one thing, and one thing only: fine-tune his swing. It’s what every demotion’s been about thus far.

Buxton’s got the tools. Stop me if you’ve heard that one before. Few players in the game have more speed. The defense certainly isn’t a question; he’s been something close to a +10 defender in center field. Already, he’s shown just how far his athleticism alone can take him, so long as the bat can do enough to stick in the lineup. If Buxton could manage a batting line just 20% below league average, as his current ZiPS projection forecasts, he could be something like a 2.5-win player at the age of 22. Even a league-average batting line would turn him into a borderline star. He would seem so close to that reality, if only his numbers didn’t make him appear so far away.

Buxton’s career batting line through 356 plate appearances sits at .199/.248/.319, the batting average being one point below the Mendoza Line embodying the tantalizing frustration of his being simultaneously so close and yet so far away. Among 363 batters who have batted at least 300 times since the beginning of last season, just three have a lower wRC+ than Buxton’s mark of 49. And so now, he returns to Rochester to diagnose what in that swing is keeping him from success at the major-league level, as we at home attempt to diagnose just how we got to this point.

In an attempt to identify any potential signs of progress, or at the very least, change, let’s take a look at some relevant batting statistics, split up into Buxton’s four (albeit brief) stints in the majors. Two last year, two thus far this year:

Byron Buxton’s Four Major League Stints
Time PA wRC+ ISO BB% K% Swing% Chase% Z-Contact% Zone%
2015, Pt. 1 39 33 .081 5.1% 38.5% 42.2% 32.6% 86.1% 42.2%
2015, Pt. 2 99 63 .131 4.0% 29.3% 46.9% 33.0% 82.6% 50.0%
2016, Pt. 1 49 27 .133 4.1% 49.0% 44.0% 32.5% 81.8% 45.5%
2016, Pt. 2 169 51 .118 6.5% 33.1% 47.5% 34.7% 81.8% 49.1%
TOTAL 356 49 .120 5.3% 34.8% 46.3% 33.7% 82.4% 48.0%

Maybe it’s a bit troubling how little this most recent — and most extended — look at Buxton differed from the first three. Over his first 187 plate appearances, Buxton ran a 47 wRC+ with a 32.1% strikeout-walk differential, an above-average chase rate, below-average in-zone contact rate, and a .121 ISO. Over his last 169 plate appearances, Buxton ran a 51 wRC+ with a 26.6% strikeout-walk differential, and nearly identical chase and in-zone contact rates that actually got slightly worse. One could find some solace in the sudden spike in walk rate that occurred over the final month preceding his demotion, but even then Buxton was still striking out in nearly 30% of his plate appearances with no power.

The numbers don’t look pretty. We all knew that. But what about the swing? It’s been a work in progress — a well-documented work in progress — and Buxton’s headed back into the lab as we speak. I was interested in the past, present, and future of Buxton’s swing, as well as the changes he’s made along the way. I’ve got some video of Buxton swings from each of his four stints, and to provide clarity and insight, I reached out to hitting instructor, former Baseball Prospectus author, and all-around knowledgeable human Ryan Parker to help guide me along.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Let’s take a look at Buxton’s swing right after his debut:

Crucial to understanding the Byron Buxton story to date is understanding the changes his swing underwent before he ever stepped foot on a major-league field. As noted Twins guru Parker Hageman pointed out back in 2013, Buxton underwent fundamental changes to his stance and swing immediately after being drafted, going from a taller, open stance to the more compact starting position with less stride that we see here.

When we saw Buxton later that year…

… he was even more compact, with the same stride. And, about that stride. With Buxton, the point of contention is the front foot. This isn’t new. The Twins have been teaching this for years. Our very own David Laurila spoke to past and present Twins hitting coach Tom Brunansky, along with former Twins prospect Joe Benson, about hitting for Baseball America back in 2011. Benson had the following to say about the Twins’ hitting philosophy:

“Stay as quiet as possible at the plate, get your foot down early, and especially with [Brunansky], working on where I need to get to in order to get extension through the baseball.”

The idea behind teaching the front foot down early, as Parker puts it, is to “prevent swings and misses, allow hitters to see the ball better, and improve a hitter’s balance.” In other words, it’s a swing geared for contact, perhaps in Buxton’s case in an effort to allow him to put the ball in play and use his speed. Problem is, it can do so at the expense of rhythm and athleticism — “The swing gets the foot down. Putting the foot down to swing is a backwards line of thinking. No hitter has ever taken a swing, looked down, and said, ‘Oh, darn! I swung and my foot is still in the air!'” — and to make matters worse, Buxton’s got baseball’s second-highest strikeout rate since his debut, so the intended contact isn’t showing up.

Let’s move to a swing from early this year:

Buxton’s even more closed now, with his body almost perfectly aligned with the pitcher, and even more compact. If you’re a Twins fan, you’ve surely thought of Carlos Gomez while watching Buxton’s struggles. Gomez was a similarly toolsy center-field prospect — though one with an admittedly more robust frame — who struggled mightily early on in Minnesota. Gomez, too, broke into the big leagues with a quiet, front foot down early swing, and didn’t find success until implementing a leg kick in Milwaukee that allowed him to generate rhythm and power in his swing.

After his demotion in early 2016, Buxton came back with a leg kick and a stance that more resembled his younger self…

… though, as our Eno Sarris pointed out in June, he would either mute it with two strikes or revert back to his “foot down early” toe-tap in an effort to maximize opportunity for contact:

Parker likes the idea of the leg kick in theory (as might a Twins fan who pines for the version of Gomez which the Brewers received), though conceded that the “front foot down early” technique still crept it’s way into the kick, leaving the execution some to be desired:

“Hitters who leg kick reach the top of their leg kick as the ball leaves the pitcher’s hand, and plant their foot back down around the time the ball is halfway to the plate. Buxton would take a decent leg kick, but then immediately place it down, negating any timing benefit he could reap from the move.”

There’s also the possibility that Buxton’s struggles could be more directly attributed to his pitch recognition and plate discipline rather than the swing itself. The swing certainly is still a work in progress, but Buxton hasn’t done himself any favors by swinging at one of baseball’s worst ratios of in-zone pitches vs. out-of-zone pitches. Though, as Parker pointed out, one could be informed by the other. “Which is to blame? The swing that made him miss the first pitch, or the lack of pitch recognition that made him chase the second?”

Hope certainly isn’t lost for Byron Buxton. He’s 22. He’s had less than a full season’s worth of plate appearances. The Gomez comp is obvious, but there have been plenty other toolsy prospects who struggled like Buxton upon their debut only to turn their careers around. Look at what Jackie Bradley Jr.‘s done in Boston after beginning his career with a 50 wRC+ over his first 530 plate appearances. Milton Bradley’s top prospect shine had dimmed after his first 434 trips to the plate resulted in a 57 wRC+. His career wRC+ over the next decade was 120. Brandon Phillips, Carlos Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada: the list goes on. History’s proven that a year’s worth of struggles, even as extreme as Buxton’s have been, are far from a death sentence.

Especially given Buxton’s tools. There’s a reason he’s been a top-10 prospect four years running. In Parker’s words, “He’s got hand speed that most hitters can only achieve in their dreams. Watching him run and throw there’s obviously an ability to make his body accelerate in a snap, but that ability has yet to show up in his swing.” Back to the lab he goes.





August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mahoney
9 years ago

You would have thought the Twins would have learned after Gomez. Pushing a speedy player to hit for contact at the expense of pop is only a good idea for the Ben Reveres of the world. Now it looks like they’ve really gunked up Buxton’s whole hitting approach. Such a shame.

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

The Twins routinely shoot themselves in the foot with their blanket approach of coaching conservatively (teaching “quiet” swings geared for contact, encouraging changeup development instead of breaking pitch development, drafting control/finesse pitchers over power pitchers, etc.) with every single player in the organization. It’s a fine approach for some, maybe even most players, but many players who were freed from the relentlessly conservative coaching of Minnesota went on to be better players with other teams – Gomez, Ortiz, Cuddyer, Hardy, Garza, Colabello, even Jason Bartlett

Doorknob11
9 years ago

One troubling thing I see is that he’s striking out a lot but it’s not your usual swing for the fences strikeout, he’s just straight up missing the ball.

Seaweed Bluetree
9 years ago

As a former college player, “Get your foot down early” and “stay as quiet as possible” are some of the worst pieces of hitting advice that one can receive. I’m appalled that someone at the major league level can be saying this kind of stuff. As a fast guy myself, this type of advice was so common over the course of my career, and it frustrates me to no end. Once I ditched this advice and turned to a leg kick, I hit better than I ever thought I could. It’s no wonder Gomez struggled as a Twin. Here’s to hoping Buxton can get a change in scenery.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

His swing is a mess, probably too much tinkering got in his head and now he hits with doubt in his mind. Obviously low power with low contact won’t work but in the minors while his contact was not great is was about average or a little below.

I think first he needs to relax a little and stop thinking so much, I think he can make better contact than that.

also I would suggest getting a good hitting coach in the offseason (like bobby tewksbary maybe) who gets his style in sync. This hit the ball on the ground and get the foot early stuff is nonsense, See the following videos:

Tewks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U3u5iYGi10

chas pipitt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2HUo44IxVE

Good hitters don’t get the front foot down early and they don’t try to hit grounders to second.

Seaweed Bluetree
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

Reading tewksbary’s stuff changed my career.

losmagpies
9 years ago

Love Tewksbary and Baseball Rebellion.
Confused by the downvotes. Do the Twins not use video? It’s not hard to look at what elite hitters do.

bartelsjason
9 years ago

I never liked Buxton’s swing, but was encouraged and excited by reports about this new leg kick he was using when he was crushing in AAA this year. I couldn’t wait to see it once he got brought back up, but was extremely disappointed by what I saw upon return. I wrote about several times a Twins Daily within his first week back.

I was upset because the leg kick just looked awful and not of the sort that others use at all. I actually thought it was by accident that his leg kick started so soon and got his foot down so soon. It sounds like maybe that was planned?! all it did was/does is result in him having to stop his body’s momentum before he swings, and then swing with ALL arms and no hip torque. It actually muted his athleticism even more than just staying still the whole time and then swinging. I gave up on him and Twins hitting coaches that first week and haven’t had hope in them since. Kicking early and getting that foot down early simply defeats the purpose of doing it in the first place.

I would love to see Buxton incorporate a wider and lower athletic stance to begin, then incorporate a fairly above average-to-high leg kick, that starts later and with the foot being placed down late, with an extremely aggressive swing with his hips (like Corey Seager hip swing aggressiveness.) Just let her buck Buxton.

He might remain a high K% guy with that, but at least he would create some crazy exit velocity with his athleticism and a swing like that. So, he would likely have a high ISO and negate his flaws of contact. This would also take pressure off him and make him more confident. Right now his swing sucks, and has no potential to create any bat speed or power, yet he still strikes out a ton.

I seriously hope they plan on incorporating an actual real leg kick and stance this time around, instead of messing with him by muting his athleticism even more in hopes of contact improvement.

bartelsjason
9 years ago
Reply to  bartelsjason

****I’d add that my personal observation is that it ‘seems’ as though there is a difference between broader more compact toolsy athletic guys like Trout and Betts, than there is a with skinny-long toolsy athletic guys like Buxton, Hayward, Maybin just off the top of my head. Think athletic and toolsy skinny/tall guys have much more trouble with timing and mechanics in both their swings and getting out of the blocks to steal basses. The shorter guys have an easier time with rhythm, timing, and more success.

Curious Gorge
9 years ago
Reply to  bartelsjason

Wouldn’t you say that Bryant is also skinny and tall? He’s been really good at making adjustments and is a really good “baseball player” in general.

bartelsjason
9 years ago
Reply to  Curious Gorge

Sure, but Bryant is not your typical athleticism first toolsy skinny player. He wasn’t/isn’t raw. He was raised with a hitting coach for a father, so is more learned in the mindset of hitting and swing mechanics. Guys like him who are in the batting cage year round and coached up at a very young age are very different than guys like Buxton who are just freak athletes with potential, but still flawed and raw.

Jeff Sullivan Salmon Feast
9 years ago
Reply to  bartelsjason

Steal all the basses you want. Just don’t touch any of the salmon!

OddBall Herrera
9 years ago

You mentioned Gomez a couple of times, but someone who seems even more analogous is Hicks. It took three years of bouncing back and forth between the majors/minors for him to even scrape out a league average season, and his debut was not quite as terrible as Buxton’s but it was in the same area code of terrible.

The Twins seem to fall in love with these toolsy guys they don’t know how to develop. The thing that astounds me is that the one who seems to have worked out so far (Kepler) ought to have been the hardest degree of difficulty of them all.

D.K. WillardsonMember since 2020
9 years ago

This issue – the inability of an organization to both identify and easily fix players is not unique to the Twins. Unfortunately, there are a lot of players performing well below their potential due to faulty advice. Alex Jackson sticks out to me as another one with a very large performance/potential gap. I find that the majority of time it comes down to the mechanics which directly impact the path/plane. If there is bat path / ball path matching in a swing, consistent results generally follow. It seems much of the advice they are given gets into minutia that has little to no bearing on results. Many cases, these are just “hot buttons” that a coach would tell all players to follow – “get foot down early” and other nonsensical advice.

With Buxton, I think it is constructive to view swings from the side. His angles, particularly upper body are not in a good position that would support an “on-plane” swing. Too bad, because like many others, there’s really very little question about his talent. With an 18% IFFB rate, it’s pretty clear there are major swing path issues.

Member since 2016
9 years ago

Fascinating that this terrible swing worked so well in the minors. Did the scouting oriented prospect gurus have any inkling that he would fail this badly?

johansantana17Member since 2026
9 years ago
Reply to 

I think his minor league success with this same swing points toward very poor pitch recognition as the more significant factor in Buxton’s big league struggles.

Goldsteins_Tool_Fedora
9 years ago

Rumors abound the big league staff has ruined him.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

I think his Swing needs some work but part of it is also mental, he is pressing and probably thinking too much.

Looks like he is just not sure how to move, maybe because he got told things by too many people.

Mark Davidson
9 years ago

Minnesota keeps missing their target. Early career Gomez, Hicks, and Buxton all look like Twins. I think the organization should say “Puckett” and let these guys play. This way the fans would have to Mourneau more.

Mahoney
9 years ago
Reply to  Mark Davidson

Those Pohlads never stood a chance. Even with a change of Gardy, the Twins org just can’t Oliva good young hitter alone.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

There is a lot of talk about the twins hitting instruction and there might be something to it but could it also be that the twins rush prospects? They say it becomes a different game above A ball and buxton only had about 300 PAs at AA+AAA ball before his first call-up. Sano also got 500 PAs in AA ball and no PAs in AAA ball before his call-up.

There are other organisations who keep their guys in AA+AAA forever like the cards seem to do in many cases which is probably not good either but I would prefer a guy dominating the high minors (AA+AAA) for at least 700-800 PAs before calling him up. Better to wait a little too long than having to send a guy down again.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

I’m not saying you must always go full season AA and then full season AAA, but less than a full season at both Levels combined is not a lot. There are Players who make the jump from AA to Majors but then at least give him a full season of AA ball.

It can work the twins way (trout had only about 400 AA and 50 AAA PAs) but it is a risk, especially because buxton did very well in the minors but did not totally tear the leagues apart like bryant or schwarber.

Even kris bryant had 600 PAs at higher Levels and he was a highly polished college hitter.

bartelsjason
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

There is probably a little something to that, if not a lot. One complaint about the Twins lately is that they aren’t necessarily rushing their prospects, but that the balance of their time spent in the minors is in the low minors rather in AA/AAA. #ManyPeopleAreSaying that they aren’t challenging guys early by keeping them too long in low minors, but then feel pressure to rush them later on.

dl80Member since 2026
9 years ago

I said this last year, but Buxton’s minor league success was almost entirely predicated on two things: 1) incredibly high BABIPs that are unsustainable in the majors, and 2) incredibly high numbers of triples that are also likely unsustainable in the majors.

His 2015 AA season was touted as a huge success, but that really didn’t point to success in the majors, in my opinion. A .283/.351/.489 stat line is great, but that came with a .332 BABIP that was probably the high point he could ever get in the majors. The very high ISO came from 12 (!) triples in 268 PA. The idea that he was going to hit 25-30 triples in the majors is just silly. That was never going to happen. Those triples in the minors are likely doubles that became triples due to bad fielding or outs that became triples due to bad fielding.

Then you see that he had only 7 doubles and 6 home runs. Even if you turn just half of those triples into doubles (leaving him with a still very high 12-15 triples over a full season), his numbers aren’t so rosy. Prorated, that is a full season with 25 or so doubles, 12 triples, and 12 home runs. That’s plenty good enough, but his line is not nearly so strong. Then when you factor in the league change from AA to majors, it’s a pedestrian line and that’s WITH the .332 BABIP.

I just never saw how he was going to be a superstar. He looks like a future Denard Span at best. A .285/.351/.391 career line with really good defense is nothing to sneeze at, but 25 WAR over 8.5 seasons when much of it is from defense is nothign special. And that, in my opinion, is Buxton’s ceiling.