The Good News About Xander Bogaerts

Xander Bogaerts has been on the major-league scene for so long that it’s easy to forget he’s still just 25 years old, young enough to be considered part of what is perhaps the best crop of young shortstops in the game’s history. He’s had his ups and downs through his four full seasons, with the second half of last year representing a particularly down one.

His recent trip to the disabled list with a non-displaced fracture of the talus bone in his left ankle might seem like a continuation of Bogaerts’ misfortune. But there’s good news: not only is the injury expected to keep Bogaerts sidelined for only 10 to 14 days but the shortstop’s performance to begin the season has rivaled Bryce Harper and Didi Gregorius as one of the young season’s best. What’s more: the underlying indicators suggest that a fundamental change is partially to credit for Bogaerts’ success.

Bogaerts injured the ankle during the seventh inning of Sunday’s 8-7 comeback victory over the Rays. He had mishandled a relay throw from J.D. Martinez, and sped towards the Tampa Bay dugout, on the third-base side of Fenway Park. He stopped the ball before it could roll into the dugout, which would have added another run onto the Rays’ 6-2 lead, but came up limping after sliding into the dugout himself. Adding insult to injury, Joey Wendle, who wound up on third after hitting the Green Monster shot that Martinez relayed, scored on a sacrifice fly anyway once Bogaerts departed, though the Red Sox rallied for six eighth-inning runs to steal the game and climb to 7-1 on the season.

On Friday, Bogaerts had been the hero in the Red Sox’ 10-3 win, driving in six runs with a two-run double and a grand slam, both off Jake Faria. The outburst ran Bogaerts’ league-leading doubles total to seven; throw in his two homers and only Gregorius has more extra-base hits. Through nine games, Bogaerts is hitting .368/.400..711, good for sole ownership or a share of third in the AL in slugging percentage, wRC+ (213), and WAR (0.7).

Faria, coincidentally, loomed large in the arc of Bogaerts’ 2017 season: it was that same right-hander who injured Bogaerts’ wrist by way of a hit by pitch on July 6, after which date the shortstop’s offensive production took a nosedive. Prior to that, Bogaerts had basically matched his 2015-16 offensive production:

Xander Bogaerts, 2015-17
Year AVG OBP SLG wRC+ BB% K%
2015 .320 .355 .421 111 4.9% 15.4%
2016 .294 .356 .446 115 8.1% 17.1%
2017 Pre-Injury .308 .361 .455 113 7.0% 18.4%
2017 Post-Injury .232 .321 .340 74 10.9% 18.1%

Bogaerts missed just one game at the time but batted only .164/.222/.194 from the point of injury through the end of July. In late August, he conceded that he had been playing through continued pain in his right hand and wrist, and altered the mechanics of his swing, telling the Providence Journal’s Tim Britton, “I started creating a lot of bad habits, and some of them have stuck still with me… I changed [my swing], and I can’t find it back. That’s the trouble swinging the way I used to swing: it would hurt a lot. So I started creating bad habits, and that’s where I am right now — bad.”

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

As the Boston Globe’s Alex Speier observed, Bogaerts “lunged at pitches in an effort to make one-handed contact as opposed to standing tall and synching up his legs, hips, and hands to create power.”

With the help of new hitting coach Tim Hyers, Bogaerts has worked on standing more upright at the plate, using his legs more and — you knew this was coming — finding a swing plane to optimize his launch angle. So far, it’s paying off. Bogaerts has cut way down on his ground-ball rate. Meanwhile, his average exit velocity, launch angle, and expected wOBA on batted balls have risen dramatically:

Bogaerts’ Batted Balls, 2015-18
Year GB/FB LD% GB% FB% Avg EV Avg Launch xwOBA
2015 2.05 21.3% 52.9% 25.8% 87.6 6.6 .295
2016 1.30 19.6% 45.5% 34.9% 88.8 11.3 .315
2017 1.60 20.6% 48.9% 30.5% 87.3 8.2 .286
2018 0.75 32.3% 29.0% 38.7% 92.8 15.0 .493
SOURCE: Baseball Savant
EV = Exit Velocity (mph), Launch = Launch Angle (degrees), xwOBA = expected wOBA

Yowzah. Obviously, small samples for 2018, and who knows how long it will take Bogaerts to get his groove back once he returns from the injury, but thus far this year, it’s been exciting to see him reassert his place in the Great Shortstop Cohort, not only underscoring the extent to which last year’s fall-off was indeed injury induced but his capacity to adjust and continue his growth.

***

About the aforementioned Cohort: the Play Index link in the first paragraph is via a 2016 piece by Ted Berg at USA Today’s For the Win blog. Berg used the Baseball-Reference Play Index to count the number of shortstops 25 and under with seasons of at least 2.0 WAR — average players or better, in other words — in any given year. He found a record 10 such shortstops (players who got at least 50% of their time at the position) in 2016, up from eight in 2015, which had matched the previous high from 1942. Rerunning his query, the 2017 season actually surpassed that mark, featuring 11 such shortstops. The FanGraphs version of WAR doesn’t make quite as strong a case for the Class of 2017, but the season is still tied for third by this count:

Shortstops 25 or Under, 2.0 WAR or More
Players listed in descending order of WAR. 1915, 1941, 1965, 1966 and 1988 all featured six such shortstops as well

The players who didn’t make the 2017 cut according to FanGraphs’ version were Orlando Arcia, Jorge Polanco, Russell, and Story. The 1942 and 1978 groups each included three Hall of Famers, with Boudreau, Reese, and Rizzuto in the former and Smith, Trammell, and Yount in the latter. If you’re wondering about the Alex Rodriguez/Derek Jeter/Nomar Garciaparra trinity, they qualified together only from 1997 to -99, with the last season one of 19 (!) featuring five such shortstops.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
KCbbq
8 years ago

Doesn’t 10-14 days on the DL seem kind of short for a fracture, even if it’s small to heal? My understanding is you can’t or shouldn’t put weight on the ankle until it heals. Must be a tiny crack.

highfivescorpion
8 years ago
Reply to  KCbbq

The ankle is constructed from a number of bones, after all. It’s certainly possible this just isn’t one of those injuries. If the Red Sox are to be trusted in their diagnosis, the injury in question isn’t season-ending even in some of the worse scenarios. This video is a breakdown on Xander’s injury:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHwV0G3FUJY

KCbbq
8 years ago

After watching the video and hearing the explanation seems to me the 10-14 days is overly optimistic. And if he comes back that fast I’m thinking he’ll have issues returning back to form for awhile.

Luy
8 years ago

Genuine question…not a passive aggressive rhetorical one:

Part of me wonders, especially since there are a number of different players on the 2015, 2016 and 2017 list, if the positional adjustment is off or partly to blame for the high SS WAR.
Please be nice about it…But can someone explain to me why this thought is wrong? What am I missing?

LHPSU
8 years ago
Reply to  Luy

– Positional adjustment is not a recent development. It’s also defensive only; with a few exceptions, most of the players on the list raked.

– One year wonders happen all the time. Performance fluctuates more than you might think. If anything, the surprising thing is that there were so many repeat performers

Damaso
8 years ago

Ah come on, you can’t blame injuries for months of Bogaerts’ babip coming back down to earth, just because the player used it as an excuse.

2017 Monthly

APR: 80pa, .365babip, .041iso, 98wrc+
MAY: 126pa, .418babip, .193iso, 148wrc+
JUN: 120pa, .329babip, .161iso, 95wrc+
JUL: 88pa, .203babip, .063iso, 16wrc+
AUG: 109pa, .278babip, .144iso, 78wrc+
SEP: 112pa, .325babip, .126iso, 115wrc+

His “pre-injury” block wasn’t a stretch of consistent quality . He had a massive blip in babip and power in May, but had already come all the way back down to earth in June, long before his injury. And by August and September all his numbers were back to normal again (with some minor babip fluctuations).

Using a minor injury to isolate his good months from his bad months is just an excuse, imo,

And then 2 weeks of stats being compared to previous seasons, when we know he’s had red hot streaks every season?

And (cue the downvotes) I thought fangraphs was done with being a specialty red sox channel. Are we going doing injury updates for every team now, or just boston?

Les Vegetables
8 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

I can feel the butthurt through my computer screen.

Luy
8 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

“You can’t just pick and choose which stats to look at. Now…if you ignore May, Bogaerts was garbage. Therefore everyone else is biased.”

L. Ron HoyabembeMember since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Good point Damaso. Don’t want Fangraphs cluttered up with injury reports every time a 25 year-old 4 WAR shortstop breaks his ankle.

clance
8 years ago

A 25 year old 4 WAR shortstop who before the injury just made a big change to his swing that renews hope that he can make the leap from borderline all star to borderline MVP candidate. Why would anyone want to hear about that?

Mean Mr. Mustard
8 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Y’know…regarding the accusation of team bias in your post, and so many that I’ve seen in comments elsewhere – I come here every day to read multiple articles and digest interesting thoughts on players, teams, trends, etc (thanks for keeping it free, guys! I plan to subscribe soon!).
And I really don’t get where these accusations come from, unless you didn’t see an article on *your* team or player that day or week or last four times you came to Fangraphs over the last six months.
Disregarding the prospect analyses, which will cover every team when they’re completed, I’ve read articles recently that were about or touched on Yankees players (of course), Astros players (of course), Denver, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Minnesota, Milwaukee, Miami, the list goes on…I mean, what more do you all want? There are outlets that specifically cover your team and your team only. Fangraphs at present can’t do that. Nor should they want to, in my opinion.
Disagree with the premise or conclusion of a particular article as much as you like; analysis and interpretation can be fallible. But complaining about team bias is puerile. A quick scan of the post list of even the last two weeks would prove that.

Sooted72
8 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

never change <3

Monsignor Martinez
8 years ago

You mean he didn’t save money on his car insurance?

RonnieDobbs
8 years ago

2.0 is an awfully low bar for WAR, especially when you consider the value attached to playing SS and the fact that they really shouldn’t be terrible base-runners – likely accumulating some value. I think all you are illustrating is the youth movement. WAR comes from PT. I don’t think it is coincidence that the youth movement lines up with a generational lack of desire to compete from many teams. Why pay a guy to play when you don’t have to? They can even sell the hype in the process… I think it is at least somewhat likely that this is not a generation crop, it is just a group that got promoted and handed the every day job sooner than their historic counterparts. Yes, I do understand that this was not the central argument.