The Multifaceted Tarik Skubal

Rick Osentoski-Imagn Images

In 2024, Tarik Skubal won the American League Cy Young. It was unanimous, and deservedly so. However many superlatives you can think of for his production, he probably deserved them. He shouldered a heavy workload, combined devastating movement and velocity with great command, and led the Tigers to the playoffs in the bargain. It’s the kind of year that stands as the best season of many players’ careers.

That might sound like I’m calling Skubal a one hit wonder, but I’m absolutely not. We projected him to be the best pitcher in baseball before the season started. We also projected him to strike out fewer batters, walk more, allow more home runs, and post a higher ERA and FIP than he did in 2024. You can be great and still worse than Skubal was in 2024. In fact, almost all great pitchers are worse than he was last year. It’s hard to be that good!

You’ll note that I didn’t say it’s impossible to be that good. That’s because, uh, have you seen Tarik Skubal pitch this year? His statistics sound almost made up. He’s the class of baseball, very clearly the best pitcher in the game this year. Of course, if you’ve kept up with our leaderboards and watched highlights, I’m not telling you anything new. But on the occasion of the best game of Skubal’s career, I thought it would be fun to dig into his marvelous season and just admire it for a bit. Tarik Skubal is everything, everywhere, all at once. His 2025 is the best in every way it’s possible to be the best. We don’t always have to wonder whether something is sustainable. Sometimes we can just appreciate it.

The greatest thing about Skubal’s 2025, at least in my opinion? His single-minded pursuit of efficiency. For guys like Skubal, the worst result of a pitch is usually a ball. When hitters chase, he’s obviously doing well. When he throws a pitch in the strike zone, he’s comically dominant. Hitters are coming up empty very frequently when they swing at pitches in the zone, and even when they make contact, that’s not the end of the world for Skubal. Most of that contact is foul, and extra bases aren’t particularly devastating for him because he allows so few baserunners. But a ball doesn’t give him a chance for any of the good outcomes. It just increases his pitch count, with a chance of also walking the runner and juicing the bases. That creates the possibility for cascading failure – runners on base make pitches in the strike zone more dangerous, but pitches outside the strike zone might put even more runners on base, and so on.

Not everyone could get away with this, of course. Throw a middling sinker like Skubal throws his top-shelf offering and it would get tattooed. But when you have his heavy-duty fastball and nasty secondaries, attacking the zone is strictly good. You can see it in Skubal’s past results, in fact. From 2020 through 2022, around 35% of the pitches he threw resulted in called balls. There’s nothing particularly wrong with that – that’s basically league average – but Tarik Skubal and league average don’t belong in the same sentence. That’s how he posted an ERA in the mid-4.00s in those years despite the eye-watering stuff that you now associate with him.

In 2023, Skubal started to bear down. He threw in the zone more frequently. When he danced off the plate, he did so in situations where hitters were more likely to swing, and also got them to swing more frequently by sharpening the break on his pitches and locating them better. His rate of balls fell to 30.6% as he broke out over 15 scintillating starts in an injury-shortened season. He held that rate last year, throwing 30.7% balls en route to his Cy Young win.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

That’s a dominant mark. It was the third-lowest rate of balls (or third-highest rate of “strikes,” including balls in play, if you’d prefer) among starters. Only Bryan Woo and Spencer Schwellenbach, noted paragons of command, did better. If you’re looking for a little historical context, my personal list of the best starters of the pitch tracking era starts with Max Scherzer, Justin Verlander, Clayton Kershaw, Chris Sale, and Jacob deGrom. Each of them has a career called ball rate between 32.4% and 34%. At their very best, they each produced seasons like Skubal’s 2024, in the low 30s or extreme upper 20s, yet another reason that it felt like a career year.

Okay, now let me tell you about 2025. You thought 30% was nice? How about 28.7%, Skubal’s league-leading mark this year? He’s pouring in strikes at a rate that says “here, hit this” like he knows they won’t. And, well, he knows they won’t! Let’s imagine the worst case for a pitcher: They throw their fastball over the heart of the plate, and the batter swings at it. It’s the most hittable pitch in baseball thrown to the most hittable location in baseball. This is where hitters make their paychecks.

Hitters don’t miss those pitches very often. Their whiff rate – swings that either miss or produce a foul tip – is only 13.5%. In other words, they put the ball in play a ton, and do a ton of damage when they do. That’s against mortals, though. Here are the pitchers who beat batters most frequently with those middle-middle fastballs:

Middle-Middle Whiff Rate On Fastballs, 2025
Pitcher Whiff%
Joe Ryan 25.4%
Jacob deGrom 25.0%
Hunter Brown 23.1%
Paul Skenes 22.2%
Shota Imanaga 21.8%
Nick Pivetta 21.4%
Hunter Greene 21.1%
Tarik Skubal 21.0%
Gavin Williams 20.3%
Will Warren 19.8%

That’s a bunch of the best pitchers in baseball, most of whom throw only four-seamers. Meanwhile, Skubal is on there even though roughly half of his fastballs are sinkers. That’s part of his magic: He can bombard the zone because he’s hard to handle even when he engages with hitters on their turf. Some of the guys on there have the best fastballs in baseball. Skubal belongs in that group.

As Thomas Harrington pointed out, Skubal’s four-seamer has gotten better this year. He’s throwing harder and inducing more vertical break, which has driven him to the best whiff rate in the majors on that pitch. When he locates it at the top of the zone, there’s nothing opposing hitters can do. And, well:

That’s pretty much perfect for someone like Skubal. He aims for the top of the zone, and if he misses, he misses over the plate. Unless he’s looking for weak contact, of course. In that case, he just dials up his sinker, a 98 mph missile that jams righties inside and almost never misses the zone; it has a preposterous 67% zone rate. Seriously, this chart is video game stuff:

You might think I’ve captured Skubal with this article so far. He throws fewer balls than anyone else in baseball, and he can do that because he has two explosive fastballs that he throws in the zone with inhumanly accurate placement. But while those two things are true, they leave something out. They leave out half of his pitches, in fact: Taken together, Skubal throws his two fastballs a mere 53% of the time.

Skubal’s most used pitch this year isn’t either of those, it’s his Bugs Bunny changeup. That descriptor is usually saved for curveballs, but if Bugs threw a changeup, it would look like Skubal’s. It travels 53 feet looking like a 90 mph fastball, but then it falls into a tiny, localized black hole. Where’d it go? Sal Frelick certainly couldn’t tell you:

That’s a ridiculous pitch. It’s 90 mph with an optical illusion strapped on. The speed and shape are a computer program’s dream. Our two pitch-level models don’t agree on changeups all that often, because there are a lot of ways to throw a good changeup, and just as many ways to throw a bad one. But both models agree: Skubal’s is the class of the major leagues. It gets on hitters instantly and falls 17 inches more than his fastball, even though his delivery makes it look exactly like a fastball.

The superlatives are endless. Hitters swing and miss on 29.7% of the changeups he throws. Not 29.7% of the ones they swing at – 29.7% overall, counting everything. They come up empty on exactly half of their swings. His 94 swinging strikes on changeups are the most in baseball by a lot – he’s 17 ahead of Cristopher Sánchez in second place. In the situation where he uses it most – two strikes to righties – he’s lethal. He’s ended at-bats on that pitch a full third of the time he throws it, the best mark in baseball, and it’s not particularly close.

Armed with that unhittable weapon, he attacks the strike zone quite a bit. He also wields it like a surgeon with a scalpel. Here’s where he throws it early in the count:

Low and away from righties, but definitely in the zone. You couldn’t do much better if you were playing a video game. With two strikes, he ventures off the plate just enough to entice bad swings:

Our pitch modeling metrics separate stuff and location. When I told you that they considered Skubal’s changeup the class of the major leagues, I was talking about the stuff grade. Ignoring location, not considering anything about that particular pitcher’s command, it’s the best changeup in baseball. But he’s also one of the best pitchers in baseball when it comes to changeup command. He’s in the top seven per PitchingBot, and the top three per Stuff+. Put it all together, and this pitch is straight up ludicrous.

I haven’t even gotten into his slider, a plus pitch of its own that he breaks out to attack lefties. At 90 mph, it’s sharp and fast, with enough wiggle to make hitters look silly. But I’ll stop there. That’s because if I didn’t stop myself somewhere, I could write about Skubal for days. When it comes to attacking with his fastball, he’s probably the best in the game. He also has the best changeup in the game, or maybe even the best secondary pitch in the game, period. It all works so well, and he knows it all works so well, that he’s using those skills to pour in pitches, letting him work deeper into games.

On Sunday, that all came to a head. Skubal struck out 13 in a dominant shutout of the Guardians, allowing only two hits and no walks. Oh, and he did it on 94 pitches, an unbelievably efficient outing. His 13 strikeouts in a Maddux – a complete game with fewer than 100 pitches – is a new all-time record, surpassing a decorated trio headlined by Sandy Koufax. He did it the way he’s pitched all season, just a shade better: overwhelming, untouchable, filling the zone with impending doom.

Is this just who Tarik Skubal is now? I don’t think so. No one’s quite this good for all that long. But who cares? That hasn’t happened yet. Right now, Tarik Skubal is pitching out of his mind. He’s pitching as well as I’ve seen anyone pitch – not necessarily better than peak Pedro or deGrom, but certainly on their level. The next big question is how long he can keep it up – because right now, he’s doing it as well as it can be done.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jewish PacheMember since 2020
1 year ago

Skubal 4 seamer average velocity

2022: 94.1
2023: 95.8
2024: 96.9
2025: 97.7

Skubal walk rate

2022: 6.7%
2023: 4.5%
2024: 4.6%
2025: 2.7%

Everybody should simply do this imo

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago
Reply to  Jewish Pache

“It’s like saying to Pavarotti teach me to sing like you”!

PC1970Member since 2024
1 year ago

I mentioned some of this in the Sunday notes thread, but, his run is insane.

Last 9 starts- 82K/3 BB

For the year, he is at 92K/7BB, which is a 13.14 BB/K ratio. All time record is 11.82.

1st in MLB in BB/9, 2nd in K’s behind Gore. He is walking guys like George Kirby & striking out guys like peak DeGrom/Scherzer.

Just nuts. Not sure he can keep this up for a full season, but, if he does, this would be in the Pedro/DeGrom pantheon of years.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  PC1970

Yes, this is very good, but I think we’ve forgotten how good peak Pedro was. As in, I don’t think it’s possible for anyone to have a year like peak Pedro anymore as a starter. Peak Pedro had a year with a FIP- of 31. If you take the best closers between 1981 and the present there are only six closers with a better FIP- than Pedro’s 1999. (If you prefer ERA- you can go with 2000 Pedro instead, but Skubal doesn’t look nearly as good in ERA-).

If you take Andres Munoz, who hasn’t even given up a run this year, only has a FIP- of 44. Remember Andrew Miller in 2016, how he was seemingly invincible? Peak Pedro had a better FIP- than Miller that year, and he did it over about 3x the number of innings.

You have perfectly slice Skubal’s year for those nine starts to get Pedro-level 1999, and even then if you prorate his year out to the same number of innings as Pedro had in 1999 (213 IP) he would still have fallen short of Pedro’s fWAR by almost a full win. Skubal’s having a great year, but his FIP- is -47 for the year.

We’re never going to see another Pedro. Skubal could do what he did over those exact 9 starts for the rest of the season he’d still fall (slightly) short of Pedro’s 1999. What he did was totally insane.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, the real secret sauce of Pedro is that he was putting up DeGrom’s raw numbers in the peak steroid era.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

On July 23rd, 2000 Pedro Martinez pitched against the Chicago White Sox.

He struck out 15, walked zero, and gave up six hits but zero runs. His game score was 101.

That was not Pedro’s best game during his peak, at least not by game score (hard to beat 0 runs and a 0.13 FIP). He had two games with a game score of 109 that year. But it’s an interesting comparison because 7 of the 9 members of the starting lineup for the White Sox had an OPS over .800.

There is only one team in MLB this year with a team-wide OPS over .800. That’s the Yankees, and the White Sox of 2000 beat them by 10 points. The Yankees wRC+ this year is 130. (The 2000 White Sox’s offense was only at 106.) Pedro put up that line against an offense that had a higher OPS than an offense that is 30% above average this year.

What Skubal did was amazing, but he did it against a lineup where only one player had an OPS above .800. The one player, Jose Ramirez, would have only been 4th in OPS in the White Sox’s lineup that day. Ramirez is the only player in Cleveland’s lineup that has a lower strikeout rate than the White Sox had as a team in 2000.

jason shureMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Randy Velarde had an .845 OPS that year. Pedro was facing murderers row every night, statistically.

HydeMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I keep trying to create competition with him for ‘best pitcher ever,’ and I keep failing. You just demonstrated why quite nicely. Pedro Martinez is to pitching what Bonds is to hitting except without the ‘roids. (I mean, the hitters were all on ‘roids, but Pedro wasn’t, to the best of my knowledge.)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Hyde

I have thought way too much about this as well, pitting different pitchers against Pedro.

I think if you look at the full career you could make a strong argument for Randy Johnson. Randy Johnson for over a thousand more innings, had five (!!!) seasons with an fWAR of 9 or more. There are only 23 seasons since 1951 where a pitcher put up an fWAR of 9 or more. Johnson has over 20% of them, more than anyone else, and ahead such unbelievable pitching talents such as Pedro, Sandy Koufax, Bob Gibson, Steve Carlton, Roger Clemens (who may or may not have been on steroids for one of them), etc. Plus he had another four seasons with an fWAR of 7 or more.

If you prefer RA9 WAR then you probably want to go with Greg Maddux, because Johnson only had three seasons with an RA9 WAR over 9, the same as Pedro, Koufax, Tom Seaver, and Robin Roberts. Maddux had 5, higher than anyone else except Clemens who also had 5 (but, steroids).

Basically these three guys–Pedro, Randy Johnson, and Maddux–pitched as well as anyone else has in the sport over multiple years and did it in a crazy run scoring environment.

HydeMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I definitely feel like Maddux might be underrated just because he wasn’t a strike out pitcher. I know we keep proving that pitchers can’t meaningfully control contact, but if anyone ever did, it was Maddux. And Randy Johnson was just special. The 90s were wild for so many reasons, but we got some absolutely extraordinary pitching out of it. Just otherworldly. Glad I’m not the only person who gets sucked down that rabbit hole at least a few times a season!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Hyde

There’s a story about late career Maddux with the Dodgers where Brad Penny let Maddux call a game for him from the dugout. Penny throws 7 shutout innings, strikes out six, and walks none. Penny was a good pitcher, but that was his third highest game score for the season. Maddux’s superpower is that he knows what other people are thinking.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
1 year ago
Reply to  Hyde

You seem a bit behind on DIPS, mate – if there’s one thing that Statcast has shown, it’s that pitchers absolutely impact quality of contact…to the point where looking at FIP is less treating OPS as meaningful in a world where wOBA exists than it is treating AVG as meaningful.

acherluckMember since 2020
1 year ago

I guffawed at the 29.7% swing rate among all changeups thrown, truly ridiculous. It’s interesting how his success has stemmed from having an extremely reliable and unhittable 4-seam fastball. I think he threw it like 85% of the time at one point in the minors. I wonder if that safety net is what allowed him to perfect his other pitches and become as dominant as he is today.

doughboyMember since 2026
1 year ago

tigers fans haven’t had much to be excited about between 2015-2023. last year was fun. but being able to watch the last two and a half years of skubal has been a real treat. now fans are left debating peak 2011 JV vs 2025 skubal. fun stuff

Sarge
1 year ago

Skubal’s rise to being the best in baseball always fascinates me. Obviously, as his wave of prospects were coming up through the Tigers’ farm system, Mize and Manning were the headliners in the class. But one of my really good friends was playing in the Eastern League at the time and if you asked him which pitcher was the best, he always said Skubal.

He’d say his whole team thought Skubal was the hardest to hit. I wonder how much of scouting could be done by simply asking the other teams which guys are legit and which guys aren’t.

jason shureMember since 2017
1 year ago
Reply to  Sarge

I have screenshotted an old email that I wrote to my 90 year old mother (big tiger fan, then only 84) in the summer of 2019 saying, roughly, “they’re all talking about Mize and Manning but there’s another guy who looks amazing in the minors.” Those were dark years for Tiger fans and our discussion at that time also included a dream of how fitting it would be for a guy with (apparently) an Arabic first name and an Eastern Eurpoean surname to play in Detroit and maybe be part of a winning period. I’m staying silent on what to do about his contract, but wow what a player.

Sarge
1 year ago
Reply to  jason shure

I’m afraid the right answer for what to do with his contract would upset a lot of people, but I try not to think of it and just enjoy each start he makes in a Tigers’ uniform.

IAgreeGoGuardsMember since 2018
1 year ago

Tarik Skubal has an 82/3 K/BB ratio in his last 9 starts. Absurd

KeithMember since 2024
1 year ago

I think most of us would love to see Skubal go all peak Pedro for a year or 3, but as pointed out already, peak Pedro is pretty much the greatest pitcher ever and that is a tough act to match.

tarvisMember since 2019
1 year ago
Reply to  Keith

I am paraphrasing a bit, but I remember when Joe Posnanksi wrote that if you had to only have one pitcher to pitch a game against the devil with your soul at stake … it would be ’99-’00 Pedro and the decision was not even that hard.

Sporter's Five HorsesMember since 2014
1 year ago

Bugs Bunny changeup is the tried and true term, no? I’ve never heard of a Bugs Bunny curveball