The Orioles Are Running Out of Lineup Spots
It’s a great time to be a fan of the Baltimore Orioles. This is now the third season since their emergence from the dark basement of the AL East, and they no longer retain their tatterdemalion appearance. The O’s, at 20-11, have been winning by the very straightforward method of beating their opponents into submission, not by collecting more than their fair share of extra-inning and one-run victories. While the pitching staff has been a big part of the team’s success, what has made the Orioles so dangerous is a lineup that leads the American League in runs scored and wRC+. Even better for an O’s fan, they’re terrorizing opposing pitchers with a lineup that’s largely made of players that came up with the franchise and are several years away from hitting free agency. And there’s more on the way, giving the team a rather novel first world problem: having too many hitters and not enough lineup spots.
That the O’s have some of the best young offensive talent in the majors should not be lost on anyone who is into baseball. Adley Rutschman was the runner-up for AL Rookie of the Year in 2022, Gunnar Henderson took the award last year, and Jackson Holliday was the heavy favorite before his poor debut. Holliday could very easily come back and win it in the end, but if he doesn’t, one of the current favorites is yet another young Baltimore left-handed hitter, Colton Cowser. Through Thursday’s games, Cowser stands with the top WAR among AL rookies, with a .277/.351/.578, 164 wRC+ line. I haven’t even mentioned Jordan Westburg, who has an .890 OPS while splitting time between second and third base.
Even with Holliday falling flat in his first 10 games in the majors – something I expect him to rectify in the not-too-distant future – the O’s are leading the league in WAR from players younger than the traditional peak age of 27.
Team | PA | HR | BA | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orioles | 513 | 25 | .276 | .332 | .493 | 137 | 5.2 |
Yankees | 470 | 16 | .274 | .365 | .438 | 135 | 4.1 |
Guardians | 746 | 17 | .253 | .324 | .392 | 109 | 3.9 |
Brewers | 644 | 13 | .270 | .341 | .394 | 111 | 3.6 |
Royals | 669 | 20 | .237 | .302 | .406 | 98 | 3.0 |
Nationals | 436 | 11 | .267 | .324 | .413 | 110 | 2.5 |
Rangers | 507 | 11 | .252 | .332 | .396 | 109 | 2.1 |
Reds | 502 | 18 | .229 | .311 | .431 | 106 | 2.1 |
Giants | 249 | 6 | .269 | .327 | .408 | 113 | 2.0 |
Braves | 333 | 4 | .280 | .351 | .377 | 110 | 1.8 |
Padres | 451 | 14 | .245 | .302 | .404 | 106 | 1.8 |
Twins | 373 | 14 | .237 | .319 | .453 | 122 | 1.7 |
Phillies | 319 | 10 | .237 | .308 | .389 | 98 | 1.7 |
Rays | 315 | 9 | .262 | .334 | .397 | 117 | 1.6 |
Tigers | 610 | 16 | .216 | .301 | .372 | 94 | 1.5 |
Diamondbacks | 428 | 5 | .245 | .331 | .346 | 97 | 1.2 |
Astros | 260 | 6 | .290 | .327 | .412 | 114 | 1.1 |
Athletics | 615 | 19 | .201 | .275 | .352 | 84 | 0.9 |
Mariners | 199 | 4 | .261 | .302 | .367 | 97 | 0.9 |
Mets | 163 | 3 | .258 | .313 | .358 | 98 | 0.8 |
Cubs | 377 | 13 | .222 | .289 | .387 | 91 | 0.7 |
Dodgers | 149 | 3 | .217 | .262 | .333 | 72 | 0.4 |
Marlins | 270 | 7 | .240 | .319 | .368 | 96 | 0.4 |
Red Sox | 435 | 13 | .220 | .281 | .391 | 84 | 0.3 |
Blue Jays | 435 | 8 | .210 | .292 | .316 | 80 | 0.2 |
Angels | 448 | 11 | .235 | .296 | .368 | 90 | -0.2 |
Cardinals | 619 | 10 | .203 | .277 | .315 | 72 | -0.2 |
Rockies | 513 | 14 | .231 | .284 | .373 | 71 | -0.7 |
Pirates | 476 | 6 | .210 | .284 | .293 | 65 | -1.0 |
White Sox | 360 | 6 | .195 | .243 | .299 | 54 | -1.5 |
In franchise history, including its first year as the Milwaukee Brewers in 1901 and through decades as the St. Louis Browns, the 2023 team ranked seventh in WAR (12.2) from position players younger than 27, and this year’s team is already within shouting distance of halfway to that mark. So naturally, my question is how this team is likely to end up by the end of the season, and whether it would stack up to the best young offensive teams ever. For this, I’ll use our Depth Charts playing time to give plausible estimates of how the O’s will use their lineup for the rest of the season.
Player | WAR | Rest of Season WAR | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Gunnar Henderson | 2.1 | 5.3 | 7.4 |
Adley Rutschman | 0.9 | 4.6 | 5.5 |
Jordan Westburg | 1.3 | 2.8 | 4.1 |
Colton Cowser | 1.3 | 1.9 | 3.2 |
Jackson Holliday | -0.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
Heston Kjerstad | -0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
Coby Mayo | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Connor Norby | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Total | 5.2 | 16.5 | 21.7 |
Even with Depth Charts projecting a much more conservative promotion schedule for Holliday than expected at the start of the season, the O’s have a mean projection of 21.7 WAR from this group of players. That would be the best in team history, edging out the 1973 club with Bobby Grich, Don Baylor, Earl Williams, and Al Bumbry as the headliners. And yes, it’s significant on a historical level as well.
Season | Team | WAR |
---|---|---|
1943 | Cardinals | 29.9 |
1942 | Red Sox | 29.6 |
1912 | Athletics | 29.3 |
1910 | Athletics | 28.3 |
1941 | Yankees | 27.8 |
1928 | Giants | 25.8 |
1988 | Reds | 24.9 |
1965 | Reds | 24.8 |
1910 | Giants | 24.3 |
1911 | Giants | 23.7 |
1912 | Red Sox | 23.4 |
1913 | Athletics | 23.4 |
1987 | Pirates | 23.2 |
1929 | Yankees | 23.1 |
1939 | Yankees | 22.9 |
1935 | Cubs | 22.9 |
1942 | Cardinals | 22.5 |
2016 | Cubs | 22.1 |
1921 | Yankes | 22.0 |
1974 | Reds | 21.9 |
1930 | Giants | 21.8 |
2024 | Orioles (Proj.) | 21.7 |
1911 | Athletics | 21.4 |
1979 | Expos | 21.4 |
1978 | Expos | 21.3 |
Their 21.7 WAR would be enough to put the Orioles in the top 25, and there’s an argument that this undersells the group. The vast majority of the teams with the most 26-and-under contributions come from the pre-World War II era, when players were called up at younger ages and there was no ticking service time clock. Looking at just the divisional era – which now covers more than half a century – the Orioles rank impressively among recent stables of young talent.
There are some mighty impressive teams on that list, most notably the Big Red Machine and the early 1970s Athletics before free agency.
And even this perhaps underrates Baltimore’s offensive talent. It wouldn’t be surprising to see Holliday destroy in the minors and get a quick call back up, and if he does, he would slide right into the everyday lineup. Otherwise, though, the Orioles are now up to the practical limitation of roster and starting lineup spots. Cowser is an example of this: It would have been hard to get him regular playing time if not for Austin Hays’ dreadful start to the season. (Hayes is now on the IL). Heston Kjerstad was called up to replace Hays on April 23, after hitting .349/.431/.744 at Triple-A Norfolk, yet the former first rounder has gotten only eight plate appearances total in three games — the O’s have played 10 games with him on the roster.
Kjerstad is far from the only Orioles farmhand who likely would have gotten more playing time on a team with a thinner roster. At Triple-A, Coby Mayo is hitting .333/.397/.683 with 11 homers while mostly playing third base, a position at which the Orioles are already overflowing. Connor Norby has split time at second base and the outfield with an .829 OPS at Norfolk, but there’s no obvious place for him to get playing time unless the team decides to cut Ramón Urías. Using up-to-date minor league translations for Kjerstad, Mayo, and Norby, we can get an idea, via some up-to-date ZiPS projections, at what this trio could do if they O’s had playing time to give them.
Player | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mayo | .243 | .326 | .438 | 460 | 65 | 112 | 25 | 2 | 20 | 76 | 49 | 138 | 3 | 112 | 1 | 2.5 |
Kjerstad | .261 | .319 | .432 | 472 | 69 | 123 | 22 | 3 | 18 | 75 | 34 | 116 | 2 | 108 | 3 | 1.6 |
Norby | .248 | .309 | .410 | 474 | 71 | 118 | 22 | 2 | 17 | 69 | 38 | 127 | 6 | 100 | -1 | 1.5 |
All three players project as league average or better if they started in the majors right now.
While this represents a pretty enviable problem for the Orioles to have, it also can be an opportunity. The organization is deep in hitters, but its farm system does not have anywhere near the same depth when it comes to pitching. We don’t yet have a 2024 farm system ranking up for the Orioles, but in the updated 2023 list, the top 15 prospects featured just two pitchers, Cade Povich and Seth Johnson. Corbin Burnes was a great acquisition, but it doesn’t have to end there; as teams fall out of contention, the possibility exists for Baltimore to add a pitcher who can not only pitch down the stretch or in a possible playoff series or three, but in 2025 and beyond. The surplus of offensive talent should give the Orioles the ability to offer more for the right pitcher than practically any other team in baseball can, and if they do swing a trade, they’d still have so many other hitters in the pipeline that such a move likely wouldn’t make a dent in the team’s long-term outlook in a meaningful way.
Whether Baltimore gets to the World Series after a drought of more than 40 years is still uncertain. But this is the Orioles team that looks the most like the ones of the early Earl Weaver years: It’s a club that’s built mostly from within and overflowing with young stars. That worked out pretty well the first time around.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
What does ZiPS think their chances of scoring 1,000 runs is?
They are a great team and could easily win the division again but also consider they had a very easy schedule in april.
Series(projected wins by pecota)
Angels(73)
Royals(76)
Pirates(73)
Red Sox(78)
Brewers(83)
Twins(85)
Royals(76)
Angels(73)
As(65)
Yankees(94)
Now the Royals and brewers seem to be better than projected but the staffs they faced where not good.
April opponent by stuff+ rank:
Angels (faced twice): 21st
Oakland: 17th
Brewers: 24th
Royals: 28th
Twins: 16th
The only good staffs they faced where the Yankees (2nd) and red Sox (6th) -one series each.
Not hating on the Os, they are definitely good but they might be more like “only” the 5th or 6th best offense rather than the 2nd best like they where in april.
Those ROS opposing team projections also reflect getting whipped by the Os/Royals.
Those where pre season projections.
I sit down, corrected!
To be fair, the O’s are 6-1 in those two series with a +20 run differential. (35(RS) 15(RA))
They are 17-5 versus teams above .500 (excluding records vs Orioles)
These teams have won at a .627 win percentage versus teams that aren’t the Orioles but only .227 versus the Orioles
All Oriole opponents have won at a .547 win percentage versus others but a .324 win percentage versus the Orioles
I honestly have no idea what that looks like from a historical perspective, but the numbers, particularly those versus teams that have performed well to this point are extremely impressive. And I know it’s early but with 21 percent of the season complete, it seems as if it’s beyond just an early trend.
Better be virtually zero.