The Price for Jose Quintana Should Also Be Sky High
With the Chicago White Sox’ decision to trade Chris Sale to the Red Sox for an impressive array of prospects, the club has made clear their intentions to begin selling. They are rebuilding, and are going to get younger with an eye on the long-term future. Yoan Moncada — maybe the best prospect in baseball — and Michael Kopech are a very good start. If we start to go down the list of players the White Sox have who might fetch a good deal on the trade market, we begin with Chris Sale. With Sale crossed off the list, the obvious next name belongs to the White Sox other ace, Jose Quintana.
To be clear, Jose Quintana is not Chris Sale. His stuff is not quite as electric, he doesn’t strike as many batters out, and he doesn’t dominate a game in the way that Sale does. But not being as good as Chris Sale isn’t much of an insult. One can be less good than Chris Sale and still really freaking good, and that basically describes Jose Quintana.
Here is a list of the top-10 pitchers in baseball over the last three years, by our version of pitcher WAR.
| # | Name | IP | BB% | K% | GB% | ERA- | FIP- | xFIP- | WAR | RA9-WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clayton Kershaw | 580 | 4% | 33% | 51% | 52 | 49 | 55 | 22.7 | 22.5 |
| 2 | Corey Kluber | 672 | 6% | 28% | 45% | 74 | 70 | 75 | 18.0 | 17.7 |
| 3 | Max Scherzer | 677 | 6% | 30% | 35% | 74 | 75 | 80 | 17.3 | 18.6 |
| 4 | David Price | 698 | 5% | 25% | 42% | 80 | 76 | 78 | 17.0 | 16.0 |
| 5 | Chris Sale | 609 | 5% | 29% | 42% | 74 | 71 | 75 | 16.6 | 16.0 |
| 6 | Jake Arrieta | 583 | 7% | 26% | 53% | 62 | 69 | 77 | 16.1 | 19.1 |
| 7 | Jon Lester | 627 | 6% | 25% | 46% | 69 | 78 | 82 | 14.9 | 16.9 |
| 8 | Jose Quintana | 614 | 6% | 21% | 44% | 81 | 77 | 90 | 14.6 | 13.7 |
| 9 | Johnny Cueto | 675 | 6% | 23% | 46% | 72 | 84 | 88 | 14.2 | 18.5 |
| 10 | Madison Bumgarner | 662 | 5% | 27% | 42% | 78 | 83 | 82 | 14.1 | 14.9 |
That’s eight guys generally agreed to be legitimate No. 1 starters, plus Quintana and Cueto, who have performed like aces despite not having classic ace stuff or ace strikeout rates. But by limiting walks and home runs, Quintana has been one of the best pitchers in baseball, in a league with guys who are unquestionably elite arms.
So that’s what he’s done. You can’t buy the past, but the past does help us predict the future to some degree. So, looking forward, we have the Steamer projections. What does Steamer think about Quintana for 2017?
Well, it thinks he’ll be a little worse, because pitchers generally do get worse as they get older. But by “worse,” that means he projects as a +4 WAR pitcher instead of a +5 WAR one, and that forecast calls for him to be as valuable as Cueto, Chris Archer, Jake Arrieta, and Dallas Keuchel. Again, these are great names with which to be associated. Steamer thinks Quintana is a top-15 or -20 starting pitcher in major-league baseball next year. And oh yeah: he’s signed for less money over the next four years than Sale is due over the next three. And that means there’s an argument that the package the White Sox receive for Quintana shouldn’t be wildly different than the one they got for Sale.
You’re reading FanGraphs, so you’re probably familiar with the concept of surplus value. And by surplus value, Sale and Quintana aren’t all that different. By a simple calculation, Quintana can reasonably be expected to produce something like the same amount of WAR over the next four years as Sale is over the next three; he’s not quite as good, but he could potentially give whatever team acquires him an extra 150-200 innings, so the total projected value over the remaining contract could be quite similar. And, again, the prices are about the same, with Quintana actually having an edge because his 2017 salary is just $7 million; he literally fits into the budget of every other team in baseball.
So the question is just how you discount the long-term value relative to the short term. If you put a lot of weight on 2017, and a lot less on 2020, then Sale’s advantage in performance outweighs Quintana’s advantage in quantity. And there’s a decent amount of evidence that teams do indeed do this, since the future is so uncertain. Quintana could blow out his arm well before 2020, so that fourth year of control is far more likely to disappear than the edge Sale has in expected performance next year. Depending on how you discount future years, you might come out with Quintana being worth something like 80-90% of Sale’s value; if you come out lower than 80%, you’re probably overweighting the differences between them, at least based on what they’ve done recently.
For Sale, the White Sox got something like $100 million in surplus value — maybe a bit more than that if you’re really high on Kopech. So that puts Quintana’s value at something like $80 to $90 million in value, and that’s still enough to command a serious haul, if not quite another Yoan Moncada. But that Victor Robles/Lucas Giolito package that was thought to be the Nationals initial push for Sale? That’s not an unreasonable ask for Quintana.
The question remains, however, how much teams will discount Quintana’s value because of how he gets outs. As mentioned, he’s the Sonny Gray type of ace, a guy who posts strikeout rates a little above league average, but dominates through walk and home-run avoidance; these guys never quite get the same kind of respect as strikeout machines. And as Gray’s implosion in 2016 reminds us, there’s more risk involved with pitch-to-contact guys, who can see their value diminish quickly if the contact gets a bit more authoritative.
But just to give some historical context to this, I took a look at pitchers from the last 50 years who (a) recorded a three-year WAR similar to the +14.6 mark Quintana has put up since 2014 started, (b) also recorded an innings total within 50 of Quintana’s overall mark from age 25 through 27, and (c) produced an age-27 WAR within +1.5 of Quintana’s +4.8 mark this past season. That search returned nine names. Here is how those pitchers performed from ages 28 through 31.
| Name | GS | IP | K/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Mussina | 127 | 872 | 8.00 | 1.99 | 0.96 | 3.50 | 3.44 | 23.0 |
| David Cone | 125 | 908 | 8.18 | 3.49 | 0.62 | 3.10 | 3.29 | 19.4 |
| Roy Oswalt | 126 | 822.2 | 6.82 | 2.05 | 0.81 | 3.42 | 3.61 | 18.2 |
| Dan Haren | 132 | 879.1 | 7.91 | 1.67 | 1.08 | 3.59 | 3.50 | 17.4 |
| David Price* | 101 | 698.2 | 9.33 | 1.74 | 0.93 | 3.25 | 3.05 | 17.0 |
| John Lackey | 117 | 778.2 | 6.98 | 2.44 | 0.91 | 3.72 | 3.87 | 13.0 |
| Bret Saberhagen | 83 | 567.1 | 6.62 | 1.43 | 0.81 | 3.39 | 3.31 | 12.5 |
| Jake Peavy | 83 | 539.1 | 8.21 | 2.35 | 0.97 | 3.95 | 3.54 | 11.9 |
| Dwight Gooden | 65 | 420.2 | 6.74 | 3.51 | 0.94 | 4.36 | 4.24 | 5.9 |
| AVERAGE | 107 | 721 | 7.60 | 2.3 | 0.89 | 3.59 | 3.54 | 15.4 |
Those are some exceptional comparisons. Only one player on that list failed to deliver a decent return, and Dwight Gooden’s off-field demons are well known, making him a poor expectation of what Quintana’s path might be. Note, too, that many of those pitchers don’t have great strikeout numbers, relying, like Quintana, on control. Guys like Haren and Lackey were also seen more as good pitchers than legitimate aces due to their lack of ace stuff, and yet, they just kept getting people out.
Quintana might have been playing second fiddle to Sale the past few years, but the team trading for Quintana isn’t getting just a run-of-the-mill good starter. Jose Quintana is excellent, and there are plenty of reasons to think he’s going to keep pitching well for a while.
The price for Sale was always going to be higher than the price for Quintana. That said, there’s a credible argument that Quintana and his bargain contract should be nearly as attractive to teams looking for high-end pitching as Sale was. The White Sox asked for the moon and appeared to have gotten it in trading their No. 1 starter; while they might aim their sights slightly lower in a return for their No. 2, the ask should still be sky high.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
What about Francis Martes, Kyle Tucker, AJ Reed, and David Paulino for Quintana? Martes is a top 25-30 prospect, Tucker is a top 50 prospect, Paulino is a top 75 prospect, and Reed isn’t minor league eligible but only has 150 PAs in the majors and was previously a top 50 prospect as well. Maybe take out Reed and Paulino and put Musgrove in?
That’s only four players. I would think they’d require a quintet for Quintana.
Done deal, the Sox would take that trade and run with that return
I’m imagining a scenario where the Sox actually initially demand more for Quintana because of the extra year of control. When clubs complain that Chicago demanded less for their other ace the Sox can coolly respond, “That was a Sale.”
I fully expect to be downvoted for that.
Say what you will about his personal life, that creep can roll.
Yeah if I’m the White Sox management I’m back on the phone to every team that was interested in Sale telling them to make me an offer on Quintana. Chicago could have the best farm system in the game by the end of this off-season if they sell off Quintana, Abreu, Eaton and Frazier.
Yeah, they could be the next Cubs/Astros/Yankees
Any reason why Dodgers haven’t gotten in on these Sale/Quintana talks? Are they really going into the season/playoffs potentially with Kersh/Hill/Urias? Hill is a great story and all but can’t be depended on. Understand that Dodgers don’t want to empty the farm, but at some point they have to make up for the loss of Greinke.
Maybe bc the Dodgers already have about 9 SPs…
And still could have used more, plus it’s not like those guys are zero value to move for another piece.
Kershaw, Hill, Urias, Maeda, De Leon is not a bad rotation. They still need to worry about filling third and second base. Personally, I don’t think the Dodgers offense is good enough for a title. I think the Dodgers are better off waiting a few years and having a staff of Kershaw, Urias, De Leon and having a core of Seager, Pederson, Bellinger, Verdugo, Calhoun, Grandal in the lineup. Throw some money at a second baseman (assuming Calhoun moves to the outfield) and that’s a better team than what they have. Trading for Quintana might still not put them over the top now and they’ll hurt their future.
Unless Nationals are sending a big package for McCutchen, they should offer the Giolito/Robles for Sale package for Quintana. They already have the beginnings of a deal and have been deep in talks with White Sox, and as the article states, Quintana is not worth much less than Sale.
No they shouldn’t. They really don’t need to add a SPer. Robles is prob going to be a star.
All they need to do is sign AC or KJ.
Quintana should be dealt as well, including all the other stars on the White Sox. The team just traded their franchise player, might as well blow it all up now.
Anyone think the Yankees might try to hop in on that? In theory their top prospects like Sheffield, Mateo, Rutherford, and Andujar are all blocked by Headley, Gardner, Torres, and Didi / Castro. I personally don’t think they’ll do it, but if there’s an arm race, they realistically have some serious firepower down there that could pry something from someone. They might try to force a playoff window open as soon as they can
The Yankees don’t yet have a core to build around. The vets you mentioned are excellent role players, but I don’t think anyone expects Didi and Castro to be key components to the next yankees run, and Headley/Ells/Gardner are on the wrong side of their peaks. These guys are not seriously blocking anyone. If they thought the young guns were ready to play, we wouldn’t see holliday in pinstripes.
Sanchez is a pretty great place to start their core, but they need 2 or 3 more young guys to be above average if they want to make a push. Good news is they have those guys coming. Maybe Bird puts it all together, maybe Judge and Torres move faster than we think. But until then, even with Quintana they’re a bubble team in a fierce wild card battle in a crowded AL.
Part of the Future Discount is uncertainty. Part is GMs being given only so many years to put a winner on the Major League field.
This will be an interesting test case for the market’s perception of value.
Quintana is the same age, similarly contracted, and nearly as valuable from a performance and projection standpoint – but the way he gets there is very different. Specifically, Sale’s is a tall athletic lefty with flashy stuff. Quintana is comparatively short and always seems to be outperforming comparatively modest stuff.
Should that matter? I don’t know, actually. But it will be interesting to see if and how much it does.
I don’t think are more than a handful of GMs (maybe none now) in the league who wouldn’t value Quintana as highly as Craig does. He’s not doing this with smoke and mirrors; his K rate keep improving and his walk rate keep declining without losing his ability to manage contact. He’s a guy who excels by having no weaknesses rather than flashy weapons.
Does anyone else think Quintana to the Bucs ought to be a layup? Bell+ ?
Quintana to HOU.
The Yanks should go after Quintana, their team WAR is 40.2 right now which is eighth. Quinana puts them at 45 WAR which makes them contenders. Package of Severino, Mateo, Judge and Cave should be enough.