The Rangers Picked a Bad Time to Slow Down

It’s been a month of upheaval in the AL West. As Jay Jaffe detailed, the Mariners are playing their best baseball of the season right now. A 9-1 stretch has carried them to the top of the division, turning what had been a two-team race all year into a three-way showdown. It’s the most competitive division race remaining, so a lot of people searching for a jolt of excitement down the stretch will be looking west.
Of course, Seattle’s climb to the top of the division didn’t happen in a vacuum. For every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction, and at the moment, that reaction is happening in Texas. The Astros spent the last week treading water, which allowed the Mariners to roar past them. The Rangers did them one worse; they’ve fallen into a 3-9 tailspin that turned a season-long lead in the division into a deficit.
It’s always tempting to turn a 3-9 stretch – or a 4-8 stretch, or really any stretch that takes a team out of first place – into a referendum on the squad. The Rangers should have seen this coming, the thinking goes. This team? With these weaknesses? It was always going to happen. But let’s withhold judgment for a few minutes and break it down like this: What’s going on in Arlington, and what has to change to turn the team’s fortunes around?
First, we have to define the time frame we’re talking about. I arbitrarily chose August 14, about two weeks ago. Why? A win that day pushed them to 3.5 games ahead of Houston, their largest divisional lead since the middle of July. Those pesky Astros had been clinging to Texas’ coattails all year, but perhaps a series of deadline moves had finally moved the Rangers into the driver’s seat. Max Scherzer, Jordan Montgomery, and Chris Stratton were just the boost the team needed.
Since then, the bottom has dropped out. Texas has gone 3-9 while getting outscored by 20 runs. Those 12 games might not hold the key to understanding what’s gone wrong, but if we examine them and strip out what’s gone right, maybe we can find some indication of what needs to change if the Rangers are going to trade blows with the Mariners and Astros down the stretch.
The major thing that has gone right is the same thing that’s been going right all year: Corey Seager, Marcus Semien, and Nathaniel Lowe have been pulling their weight. They’ve each played every game, and they’re the top three hitters in plate appearances over that span, naturally enough. Seager has been incandescent all year, and “all year” includes the past two weeks, during which he’s slashed .340/.431/.660. Add Mitch Garver to that list; while alternating between catcher and DH, he’s surged offensively in the second half.
If you split any season into small enough parts, you’ll find some weaknesses, because that’s just how baseball works. Jonah Heim and Adolis García, two of the players whose success has fueled the Rangers’ rise this year, have had a rough few weeks. Heim is hitting .167/.219/.267, and García’s .155/.191/.311 line is no better. But again, we’re talking about 11 games here. You can’t focus too much on any one player. In aggregate, the offense has produced roughly four runs per game – not great, but hardly disastrous – and an 87 wRC+.
If you’re diagnosing what ails Texas’ offense, you’ll likely come away with the same view that unbiased observers already had coming into the season: The team needs more contributions from the outfield. The problem isn’t so much that García had a down stretch; it’s that when he’s having a down stretch, there’s no one to pick up the slack. With Josh Jung’s injury, the Rangers are short on everyday regulars. Leody Taveras, Robbie Grossman, and Travis Jankowski are covering 2.5 spots (two outfielder positions and DH, more or less), and they’re not quite cut out for the job. They’ve produced an aggregate 48 wRC+ in this stretch. Ezequiel Duran, who would normally send one of those guys to the bench, is playing third base full-time until Jung returns. The offense is just one horse short, in other words.
That’s hardly enough of a problem to explain the team’s recent poor form, though. And another common explanation, their record in one-run games, doesn’t pass muster either. The Rangers are 1-3 in one-run games during their recent swoon, but that still leaves six multi-run losses, and it’s not like all of those were close. As you might expect, the pitching staff has struggled mightily.
It’s no coincidence that the Rangers focused on adding pitchers at the trade deadline. They spent the offseason upgrading the rotation, only to be stymied by Jacob deGrom’s season-ending UCL tear and a forearm strain that has sidelined Nathan Eovaldi since July 18. Montgomery and Scherzer were as much backfill for those two starters as an attempt to take a step forward.
Fortuitously for Texas, those deadline additions have been the class of the rotation even in the team’s recent dip. Montgomery has made three starts and compiled a 1.86 ERA; Scherzer is second on the team in starter ERA and FIP over that stretch. The problem? He’s second despite two poor performances, at least measured by Scherzer’s exacting standards: a combined 10.2 innings, a 4.22 ERA, and a 3.55 FIP thanks to control issues (he’s issued five walks).
Again, that’s the good pitching. The rest of the rotation has been somewhere between bad and unfathomable. Jon Gray has a 4.76 ERA thanks to an awful start against the Diamondbacks (four innings, five earned runs), though he’s been good in his other two turns. Andrew Heaney hasn’t made it out of the fifth inning in his last two starts. Dane Dunning has allowed seven earned runs in his last nine innings of work. Excluding Montgomery, the starters aren’t providing good run prevention or even good volume; they’re putting up ERAs in the sixes and leaving plenty of work for the bullpen to do afterwards, a rough combination.
And oh, that poor bullpen. It’s been a team weakness all year; trading for Aroldis Chapman helped, but it’s still lacking both top-end arms and depth. Asked to bail out every non-Montgomery starter seemingly every day, the unit has been unable to answer the bell. Things have gotten really ugly. The bullpen ERA in this span is an unsightly 6.41, and this isn’t some batted ball luck issue; their 5.97 FIP is equally shocking.
ERA is a particularly silly way to think about relievers in short stints, but the headline number still astounds: 10 relievers have appeared in this stretch, and six of them have an ERA above six. Six of them have a FIP above six. It’s not just home run luck, either; only two relievers have an xFIP below 4.00 in that span. Chapman and José Leclerc are trudging along; everyone else has been getting crushed into orbit.
What’s amazing to me about this slump is that it perfectly matches the questions that analysts and prognosticators had about the team’s chances coming into 2023. No one doubted their infield, and the starting rotation looked dominant if everyone stayed healthy. But the outfield and the bullpen were question marks, and of course health is never a given, particularly when it comes to starters.
Those weaknesses haven’t doomed the team to a failed season; they’re 74-57 despite these exact spots being question marks all year. But they’ve turned the route to the playoffs from a downhill glide into an uphill march. No team in the American League has seen their playoff odds shrink more over this stretch than Texas’ 29.3 percentage point decrease (the Blue Jays are second, naturally). What looked like an automatic playoff berth is now a 2-in-3 chance.
If Rangers fans feel like they’ve gotten a raw deal, I sympathize with them. Sure, the team came into the year with some clear weak points, but the strong points have more than covered for them in aggregate. We’re not talking about some team skating by thanks to an unsustainable string of one-run victories; they have the third-best run differential in the majors, and their underlying component stats are even better than that. Only the Braves have a better BaseRuns record, which is calculated by looking at individual outcomes on a per-PA basis rather than at how many runs have actually scored. These are no paper champions; they’ve been performing like a top team all season.
That’s how baseball works, though. Those games are all water under the bridge, their outcomes set in stone. The Rangers have gotten to the end of August in playoff position, but only barely; they’re tied with the Astros, and the two of them occupy the second and third Wild Card spots. The Blue Jays lurk 2.5 games behind. Of the four playoff hopefuls jockeying for three spots (Texas, Houston, Seattle, and Toronto), the Rangers have the toughest remaining schedule.
Luckily, they also have one of the best teams in the American League. Bullpen holes notwithstanding, weak outfield taken into account, our Depth Charts projections think the Rangers are the sixth-best AL team going forward, and the 10th-best team overall. They’re within a margin of error of the other teams they’re contending with on that front; we’re talking a handful of games over an entire season, little enough difference as to feel negligible over a single month.
That should be the biggest takeaway of the past few weeks for the Rangers: At the end of the day, none of this might matter. A few weeks ago, they were locked in a tight race for the AL West title, one that a series or two might determine. Today, the same thing is true. A few weeks ago, they had a team that was among the top teams in the AL, a bona fide World Series contender. Today, the same thing is true. Injuries haven’t derailed them. Their superstars haven’t turned to dust. Eovaldi and Jung are still slated to return before season’s end. Things might not be great, but they’re far from horrible.
That’s wonderful. Too many of these “this team crashed” stories end with no hope. The Cardinals, Mets, Padres, and Yankees have slumped their way out of relevance this year. A few rough weeks in Cleveland have buried the Guardians. But the Rangers are too good, and they’ve played too well, to fall victim to that fate.
Could their bullpen betray them further, keeping them out of the playoffs after all? Most definitely. Could the offense grind to a halt? Of course. But in a season most notable for would-be contenders and their fatal flaws, the Rangers don’t quite fit the bill. They’re still a playoff-caliber team regardless of their recent form. The last month of the season promises to be tremendously exciting. Don’t count the Rangers out of it just because they picked a bad few weeks for a slump.
Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.
Well that’s a decently heartening read for a rough stretch
I wasn’t as worried about the outfield, because I expected Taveras to take a step forward on offense this year. And like, he has? But not nearly enough of one. Still chases way too much.
Expecting a Grossman rebound that didn’t happen also was a mistake.
Jankowski, on the other hand, definitely came out of absolutely nowhere.
Sidenote, why can’t I edit my comments? I keep getting an error message covered by the banner when I try.
Interestingly Grossman has been pretty good over the last couple of weeks. So while he’s been a net negative on the year, he isn’t responsible for this.
Given his production over the rest of the season, it’s kind of six of one, half a dozen of the other.
Also, it’s solely the .375 BABIP he’s running over that span. His average exit velo is down 3 mph from his season average during that time. So it’s not really a turnaround either, just a hot streak.
It looks like a little bit of everything. Here are some ranks in MLB, pre August 14th and post August 14th…
wRC+: 2nd before, 15th after
Def: 2nd before, 8th after
FIP-: 9th before, 14th after
If you drill down like in the article and look at rate stats, the bullpen is the most extreme culprit, going from 14th to 29th. But they’re also only responsible for about 40% of the innings, and it seems like the real culprit here is Martin Perez: He has pitched 10 innings, more than any other member of the bullpen, and he is getting put in when the starter has to get pulled early. He’s going for a multi-inning stretch and got shredded in two of his four games. But that’s jut two games; he was good in the other two (both of which the Rangers won).
So it really does seem like it’s a team effort here. Everything was clicking and now it is not.
Will Smith has been pretty abysmal lately also
Also, Josh Sborz was fabulous in the bullpen except for like, five outings. He’s a guy who seems like he’s one or two tweaks away from being a great late-inning option.
Heim playing hurt doesn’t help
As a person who constantly rails against the inability of statistical analysis to be able to measure the importance of context in its attempt to turn baseball into a mathematical equation I offer Nathaniel Lowe’s AB with 2 outs in the top of the 9th in last night’s game with the Mets. Trailing 3-2, Heim singled, then Duran doubled but. in the clutch, Taveras fanned and Semien also spit the bit. Losing would have been bad enough, but failing to get the runs in from 3rd with no outs would have been crushing to the psyche of a team that is already on the ropes. It is not unreasonable to think that Lowe’s game winning 2 out single did much more than win one game. Is it hyperbole to say that he saved the season? That probably goes a little bit too far but this is so much more than just another single and, in reality, is worth infinitely more than any analytics can accurately portray.
I feel like that would pretty easily fit into his WPA
Yes, WPA would account for these sorts of cases. Unfortunately, it drags in a bunch of error from all the other times Lowe came up to the plate, so we don’t know if it’s overall better or worse. You can’t really build entire statistics around anecdotes like this without seeing what it does to all the other plate appearances too.
That’s the big problem. Every time we try to account for context in player value we wind up dragging so much junk into it that it moves us further away from understanding player value.
Most of the advanced stats intentionally remove context. Understanding what a player is likely to do in the future in a different stadium/defense is very different than watching the game and seeing who drove in the winning run. Both have their place
Which is the reason they can’t accept the fact that David Ortiz was a much better hitter than even his great numbers tell us. As a past AAAA quality professional golfer, I can tell you, with certainty, that there is a choke gene. It is harder to be definitive about a clutch gene but there are plenty of examples that appear to support the idea that there is.
I’m sorry, exactly who can’t accept what fact? Ortiz is a 1st ballot hall of famer and won multiple titles and awards. He’s properly rated in the annals of baseball history, no? Is there some unrecognized greater level of awesome for which he isn’t given credit?!
Also, I’m not sure the context for Nathaniel Lowe’s heroics deserve extra credit. Probably mitigated by the context of Texas playing so badly as to be in that situation vs. the Mets in the first place. But I’m down for a chat to explore the ins and outs of this either way (the discussion for the WPA-related posting recently here on Fangraphs was a terrific read).
He was elected to the HOF on his overall body of work but every Red Sox fan will tell you that a special aura came over Fenway Park when Ortiz came to the plate with the game on the line. Did he always come through? No, of course not, but his performance in Games 4, 5, and 7 of the 2004 ALCS and Game 2 of the 2013 ALCS, or the entire 2013 World Series isn’t luck. To attempt to take the individual out of the equation and turn the player into some sort of machine is just plain crazy. Maybe because I was in the arena I see performance under pressure differently than those who want to turn everything into into percentages instead of people..
I have no doubt that David Ortiz was “clutch” in a way that is interesting, because I saw him do this a lot. But that’s just it…it’s interesting because it was so rare. Not something that would cause us to reevaluate all of our stats.
Career batting runs above average 485. Career WPA 50. Career Clutch -1. He seems like a great hitter about the same in and out of Clutch situations
That “clutch” stat is absolute junk though. WPA captures the concept of clutchness pretty well (one of the reasons it’s not really a measure of player value, even though it’s a lot of fun). The clutch stat takes WPA and gives it a terrible denominator.
But isn’t that the crux of my side of the argument? Just because it is rare doesn’t mean it isn’t real. In my youth Yogi Berra carried the same respect for delivering when it mattered most. Players are not robots and to make a universal claim that hitting in the clutch isn’t real but is merely a random statistic that throws every player into the same pot is erroneous.
Seeing black swans only proves that they exist, not how meaningful it is or how common. The concept of clutch hitting keeps shifting to fit whatever people want it to be anyway.
Things like clutch, that are insistent on resisting any analytical approach to finding them,… well, you should keep your faith, but at least acknowledge the possibility that the reason no one can prove it is that it doesn’t exist. (My takeaway is that most clutch performers can be easily recast as lazy players who can’t be bothered to perform at their best when the stakes aren’t high enough. Or rather, people with some form of executive function/ADHD disorder.)
That is a very reductive take, bookbook. Clutch may not exist, but belittling players regarded as clutch for being lazy or saying they have a disorder is just a gross assertion.
I wouldn’t go so far as to call it a “choke” gene. I think when people are reasonable about what “clutch” means — it’s less about being better than you normally are in “important” situations, and more about being close to your normal output in those situations.
The unfortunate thing for “measuring” clutch is that we don’t have a large enough sample (generally) to definitively say whether someone’s performance is clutchy, chokey, or just random variation.
I can tell you that when my fellow competitor took out an iron because there was a 5% chance that he might hit his drive out of bounds that he was shaking in his boots, but golf exposes the individual much more than a team game. We all see it, the basketball player who wants the ball versus the shrinking violet who hides in the corner.
On the choke gene, clutchness, etc., I’d say that most major league baseball players are probably “not unclutch”, and if they develop some sort of clutchness “yips” that would spill over into their overall play, and they’d soon pass out of baseball.
On the impact of a clutch hit on a team’s overall psyche, I do believe that’s a great point. I do not doubt that teams that get a string of bad luck or performance in key spots might start to press, and that could cause a downward spiral in performance. So, even if we can’t say that Nathaniel Lowe has is a clutch player, his big hit may very well have had value to the Rangers beyond just that game.
I have no idea if Nathaniel Lowe is a clutch hitter or not but that doesn’t change the importance of his hit. While I understand the importance of individual performance, one of my problems with everybody bowing at the throne of statistical analysis is that it ignores the importance of the team aspect.
I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here about stats and the Nate Lowe hit. That stats can’t account for how it made the team feel good to win that game?
Need a Vibes Above Replacement stat in the Fangraphs leaderboards.
Amazing
It’s the second highest cWPA single play thus far this season — only behind Pham’s walkoff against Will Smith last week in the 11th.
Serious question: why would you find yourself commenting on Fangraphs of all places on Beyoncé’s Great Internet? Is there not some sort of “former AAAA Golf Experts” blog where they’re doing the important work of attempting to not quantify stuff?
Why are you here?
The Rangers are a strange team. Or can be a boring team. You can watch a game and the bats don’t show up and there’s a lack of energy and they lose soundly. Other times the thunder comes out and pitching looks great. They’re 25th in SB(Angels 27th), so they can’t press the issue if the bats don’t show up.
2nd in wRC+ but 27th in Clutch offense. 8th in Pitching WAR but 28th in Clutch pitching. I can see how that would look passive. Fortunately it’s not predictive
“The Rangers are a strange team. Or can be a boring team. You can watch a game and the bats don’t show up and there’s a lack of energy and they lose soundly.”
See also: 29 other MLB teams who fit the above description
Rangers and Mariners play each other 7 of the last 10 games of the season, the final 4 in Seattle. Ought to be real fun.
Really wish they’d call up Justin Foscue to play some DH/3B
If they really want to be bold, they could call up Evan Carter. Garver seems fine at DH.
Rangers seem like a good team going through a cold spell. If we want to worry about someone, I’d worry about the Orioles. They shouldn’t lose 10.5 games vs the Blue Jays but they could make it interesting.
Blue Jays can’t stay healthy (Bichette and Chapman both recently going down) and can’t hit enough to begin with, which is a shame given how good the offense was in recent years coupled with the fact that the pitching has been pretty excellent this year (leading the league in ERA). Their schedule eases up somewhat but they also have like seven left versus the Rays.
It’s too bad the Rays also have been wrecked by injuries and the behavior of Wander Franco.
The Angels may have just given them a lifeline.