The Second-Half Slides That Have Crowded the Wild Card Races
It didn’t explicitly come up in the Effectively Wild podcast spot I did highlighting this year’s Team Entropy series, but one reason why the Wild Card races that I covered in my second installment early this week are so wild — with five teams chasing two spots in the AL, and five more chasing one spot in the NL — is a handful of prominent collapses. The Mets, Padres, and Red Sox all spent a good chunk of the season occupying playoff positions, with New York and Boston occupying the top spots in their respective divisions for more days than any of their competitors. Yet all three teams could miss out on October baseball thanks to some of the most drastic first half-to-second-half drop-offs we’ve seen in recent years.
The Mets, despite a slew of injuries, led the NL East — at times with company in first place — for nearly four months, from April 13 to August 6, with a slight return after falling out of first that stretched the window to August 13. They somehow did that by posting winning records only in May (17-9) and July (14-13), and even after being overtaken, they remained within striking distance for about half of a dreadful August during which they went 9-19. Since the July 30 trade deadline, when they acquired Javier Báez but arguably didn’t do enough to bolster their rotation — a decision that was exacerbated by Jacob deGrom’s subsequent setback, which came to light almost immediately after the deadline passed — they’ve gone just 17-28. At this writing, they’re 72-75, 5 1/2 games behind the Braves in the NL East, and five behind the Cardinal for the second NL Wild Card spot, with cumulative playoff odds of 2.1%. I’m skeptical they’ll be relevant by the time I next cover Team Entropy.
The Red Sox had an on-and-off relationship with first place in the AL East, occupying at least a share of it from April 8 through May 23, and then again for most of a stretch that ran from June 19 through July 30. They’ve gone just 20-24 since the deadline passed, for the third-worst record in the AL; they did so while the Rays (29-14), Blue Jays (31-16), and Yankees (29-16) peeled off the AL’s top three records in that span. A wave of COVID infections has played a part, knocking 12 players — including Xander Bogaerts, Enrique Hernández, Chris Sale, and Matt Barnes — out of action since August 27; notably, the Red Sox are one of the six teams that has failed to reach the 85% vaccination threshold to loosen protocols, though the majority of those infected were vaccinated. They’re now 8 1/2 games back in the AL East, but occupying the second Wild Card spot, a percentage point behind the Blue Jays and half a game ahead of the Yankees, with Playoff Odds of 75.3%.
The Padres were projected to be one of the NL’s two best teams, albeit in a division occupied by the other one, the Dodgers. But while the defending champions have indeed been one of the top two, it’s been the Giants, not the Padres, who have provided their closest competition; San Diego has spent just 14 days in first place in the NL West. Even so, they spent nearly three-quarters of the season with Playoff Odds of 75% or better, but have gone just 16-25 since the deadline, and 10-21 since August 10. Having just won back-to-back games for the second time in the past five weeks, they’ve closed the gap behind the Giants to, uh, 18 1/2 games, but their Playoff Odds have dwindled to 32.0%.
As you can see, there’s a pretty wide spread when it comes to these three teams’ chances of playing October baseball, but each has fallen significantly from the spots they occupied earlier in the season. Depending on where I set the endpoints, their slumps might appear even more acute, which works for storytelling purposes, but is harder for comparative analysis. Since all three were riding rather high in early July, I decided to see how their declines in winning percentage from the first 81 games — a point the Padres reached on June 29, the Red Sox on June 30, and the Mets on July 4 — to the second compared to those of other teams in recent years.
As it turns out, the Padres’ drop from a .593 first-half winning percentage — the first 81 games of the season, not the uneven “halves” defined by proximity to the All-Star break — to a .422 second-half mark so far is the fourth-largest since 2012, the start of the two Wild Card team era; their dip ranked second until this two-game hot streak. Meanwhile those Red Sox and Mets rank among the dozen largest drop-offs, with yet another team from this year, one I hadn’t even considered for this piece given my apparent East Coast bias, in the top 20:
| Team | Year | W-L1 | WPCT1 | W-L2 | WPCT2 | WPCT Dif | Postseason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brewers | 2014 | 49-32 | .605 | 33-48 | .407 | -.198 | |
| Athletics | 2014 | 51-30 | .630 | 37-44 | .457 | -.173 | Wildcard |
| Mets | 2012 | 44-37 | .543 | 30-51 | .370 | -.173 | |
| Padres | 2021 | 48-33 | .593 | 27-37 | .422 | -.171 | |
| Giants | 2016 | 50-31 | .617 | 37-44 | .457 | -.160 | Wildcard |
| Rangers | 2019 | 45-36 | .556 | 33-48 | .407 | -.149 | |
| Diamondbacks | 2018 | 47-34 | .580 | 35-46 | .432 | -.148 | |
| Pirates | 2012 | 45-36 | .556 | 34-47 | .420 | -.136 | |
| Mariners | 2018 | 50-31 | .617 | 39-42 | .481 | -.136 | |
| Red Sox | 2021 | 50-31 | .617 | 33-34 | .493 | -.124 | |
| Mets | 2021 | 44-37 | .543 | 28-38 | .424 | -.119 | |
| Rangers | 2016 | 52-29 | .642 | 43-38 | .531 | -.111 | Division Champ |
| Pirates | 2013 | 51-30 | .630 | 43-38 | .531 | -.099 | Wildcard |
| Yankees | 2018 | 54-27 | .667 | 46-35 | .568 | -.099 | Wildcard |
| Phillies | 2018 | 44-37 | .543 | 36-45 | .444 | -.099 | |
| Astros | 2015 | 47-34 | .580 | 39-42 | .481 | -.099 | Wildcard |
| Athletics | 2021 | 47-34 | .580 | 31-33 | .484 | -.096 | |
| Nationals | 2015 | 45-36 | .556 | 38-43 | .469 | -.087 | |
| Blue Jays | 2014 | 45-36 | .556 | 38-43 | .469 | -.087 | |
| Astros | 2017 | 54-27 | .667 | 47-34 | .580 | -.087 | WS Champ |
That’s not really a list you want to be on, judging by the minimal postseason impact of those teams. Obviously, we don’t yet know the playoff fates of the Padres, Red Sox, Mets (well, I think we know that one), and A’s (welcome to the party). Of the other 16 teams, seven made the playoffs; four won Wild Card games (the 2013 Pirates, ’15 Astros, ’16 Giants, and ’18 Yankees), but the only one that won a Division Series or a later round was the ’17 Astros, who, well, you know. Only one team with a drop-off of at least 87 points and a sub-.500 record in the second half won so much as a Wild Card game, namely the 2015 Astros.
Since the A’s turn up here, their arc is worth retracing as well. Despite being outscored in both April and May, strongly suggesting that they were playing over their heads, they climbed to the top of the AL West, and spent all but a single day of the next two months there, from April 20 to June 20. Despite their stellar June (17-9), an Astros team that had been lurking just behind them overtook them, and while the A’s were just 1 1/2 games back at the 81-game mark, and just 2 1/2 back at the 115-game mark (August 14) after some ups and downs, they’ve lost 18 of their last 29 and fallen seven games back. Their Playoff Odds peaked at 76.9% on June 18, and spent the next two months mostly in the 40-60% range, but they’ve plummeted from 62.5% on August 12 to just 4.3%.
So that’s two AL and two NL teams that have each taken rather dramatic tumbles this season. As you can see from the table above, it’s the second time within this span we’ve seen four teams from a single season take such falls; in 2018, the Yankees and Mariners both crumbled, as did the Phillies and Diamondbacks, with Philadelphia even sliding below .500 for the season to finish 80-82.
Not surprisingly, all four of these teams that have crashed in 2021 have underachieved relative to their Pythagenpat records during the second half. The Padres are the only ones who were underachieving during the season’s first half as well:
| Team | RS1 | RA1 | WPCT1 | Pyth WPCT1 | RS2 | RA2 | WPCT2 | Pyth WPCT2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Sox | 5.06 | 4.47 | .617 | .557 | 5.10 | 4.93 | .493 | .516 | |
| Padres | 4.57 | 3.60 | .593 | .607 | 4.47 | 4.89 | .422 | .459 | |
| A’s | 4.54 | 4.14 | .580 | .543 | 4.70 | 4.28 | .484 | .543 | |
| Mets | 3.72 | 3.64 | .543 | .509 | 4.27 | 4.64 | .424 | .463 |
For the Padres, this has mainly been about the collapse of a rotation projected to be the majors’ best coming into the season; it’s been lit for a 5.52 ERA and 4.82 FIP in this second half. Yu Darvish has been battered for a 7.67 ERA and 5.74 FIP in 54 innings during this slide, that while landing on the injured list twice, for left hip tightness and lower back tightness. Ryan Weathers has completely collapsed (9.00 ERA, 7.55 FIP in 38.1 innings) after a promising beginning, Chris Paddack (5.74 ERA, 4.13 FIP in 42.1 innings) has had some bad luck, and even Joe Musgrove has regressed (3.79 ERA, 4.31 FIP). On the other hand, Blake Snell (3.03 ERA, 3.34 FIP) turned his season around, but a groin strain forced him out during the first inning of his September 12 start against the Dodgers. Adding insult to injury, the Padres reportedly were close to acquiring Max Scherzer at the deadline, only to watch as the Dodgers snatched him away, and he’s been brilliant. Scrapheap pickup Jake Arrieta? Not so much.
Run prevention has become a major issue for the Red Sox as well, with both the rotation and bullpen (4.42 ERA and 4.59 ERA, respectively) underperforming their FIPs by about four-tenths of a run. High-leverage guys such as Barnes, Adam Ottavino, and Hansel Robles have been particularly lousy. On the offensive side, the Sox have been a juggernaut, but while they’ve received a 100 wRC+ or better from nine out of the 11 players with 90 or more PA since July 1, Bogaerts (107 wRC+) and J.D. Martinez (108) haven’t been themselves, and rookie center fielder Jarren Duran (50) was over his head before landing on the COVID-19 injured list.
The Mets have continued to show holes on both sides of the ball. Offensively, Jeff McNeil (91 wRC+), James McCann (66), and Dominic Smith (56) have come up notably short even while the arrival of Báez (156), the return of J.D. Davis (118), and the upswing of Francisco Lindor (139) after a dreadful beginning to his season have helped; the last of those made the 36 games he missed due to an oblique strain a particularly big thumbs down. While late July additions Rich Hill and Trevor Williams have been pretty good, they don’t add up to a deGrom; meanwhile, the much-awaited arrival of Carlos Carrasco (5.59 ERA, 4.38 FIP) hasn’t really panned out, and Taijuan Walker (7.04 ERA, 6.90 FIP) has turned into a pumpkin. Key relievers such as Seth Lugo, Trevor May, Jeurys Familia, and Edwin Díaz have taken steps backwards of varying size at the wrong time as well.
By runs scored and allowed, the A’s have produced the same Pythagenpat winning percentages in both halves, but have gone from overachieving by 37 points to underachieving by 59 points, making for both the largest second-half shortfall and the largest overall swing relative to their expected record. The second-half fades of Sean Manaea and James Kaprielian and the frightening loss of Chris Bassitt (who’s still rehabbing his way back) have loomed large in the rotation. The bullpen — particularly Lou Trivino, Sergio Romo, and Yusmeiro Petit, three of the most four heavily-used relievers in the second half — has proven shaky as well.
For as much as these four teams have in common in terms of the severity of their second-half slides, and for as crowded as they’ve made the Wild Card races, it’s clear by now that the A’s and Mets are just hanging on, while the Red Sox are odds-on favorites to make it through, and the Padres are hardly out of it. Still, when the playoff slate is finally set, at least some of these teams will look back and wonder what might have been, and how they fell so far.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
So much of success for the vast “mushy middle” of MLB comes down to the timing and severity of injuries. Unless you’re a no-doubt great team (with depth) or a no-doubt bad one, luck probably explains most of the variance.
I am sure that there are other examples of this but this is a pretty spectacular set of crashes. Of these, you have to absolve the Padres a bit because a lot of that is due to injuries. It’s also worth noting that, despite the Padres totally crashing they are somehow still a half game ahead of the Reds (and a half game behind the Cards) for that second wild card spot. This isn’t like the Braves and Phillies taking advantage of the Mets collapse, or the various AL East teams taking advantage of the Red Sox imploding. Somehow the Padres, despite all of the injuries and their brutal schedule the last couple months, are still in this.
This is what happens when you get into the playoffs with a barely-over-500 record: Everyone stays in it until the bitter end.
Right when Jon Lester and JA Happ are keeping one team’s playoff hopes alive and Jake Arrieta and Vince Velasquez are trying to keep another team’s hopes alive and this is 2021 not 2016 thing seem a little off.
Well, the latter two are failing at doing so, including a lousy start by Velasquez tonight. Somehow, the Cardinals have mostly succeeded at grabbing quality pitchers off the scrap heap, while the Padres (like most teams who are desperate enough to try it) have failed to do so.
The Padres schedule was not brutal coming into the second half. I think the Padres had a chance right at the start of their 2nd half to sow this up, but from 7/31 – 8/22 they were 20 – 25 vs mostly 2nd and third tier teams: going 3 – 7 against the Rox, 3 – 4 vs AZ and 10 – 10 vs the NLE teams (WAS, MIA, PHI). Yes they were injured but all these teams should be beatable or even .500, not 5 games under. Meanwhile STL is injured and they pick up the ghosts of Jon Lester and JA Happ and even with that have been able to play well enough to challenge for this final spot. The Reds just hope neither of these teams sweeps this weekend so they can catch them both with the softest schedule over the final 2 weeks.
Yeah, I should have been more clear about that. Their schedule the last two months of the year is awful, not the last two months from now.
It’s not just Lester and Happ. Wade Leblanc (while he was healthy), T. J. McFarland, and Luis Garcia have also been good mid-season scarp heap pickups for the Cardinals’ pitching staff.
They may also get Hudson and/or Flaherty back before the end of the regular season.
It’s hard not to feel bad for the Pads, but I think you can hold Preller accountable for losing out on Scherzer only to come up with Arrieta. Their rotation was never as solid as it “should” have been; even then, I think a better case could be made for pitching over Adam Frazier. Maybe you still don’t get Scherzer, but there were other guys.
Right, Frazier was not needed – and neither was Kim if we are going there – maybe they didn’t think Tatis was healthy enough to make it through the season, and then with that thought realized that Kim wasn’t good enough. But whatever, they needed to take care of some innings and just failed to do it. Then again the same might have been said about St Louis, but somehow they are OK…at least for now.
Agreed – continuing to run Arrieta out there at this point is ridiculous. It is crystal clear he has nothing left to give. Didn’t make it out of the first yesterday, to the surprise of absolutely no one.
“Of these, you have to absolve the Padres a bit because a lot of that is due to injuries”
I don’t understand this justification at all. It’s no surprise that some teams do a much better job at managing injuries than others. Some do absolutely putrid jobs at keeping players healthy (i.e. Yankees). Are we willing to consider that the Padres’ injury issues are a feature, and not a bug?
Let’s not forget that the best pitching prospect in baseball forgot how to pitch.
gosh I remember going to Atlanta for work in 2014 and being there the same time Oakland was in town just after they got Lester. I saw Sonny Gray vs Teheran and then next thing I knew Oakland completely fell apart the rest of the season
As an obsessive Padres fan, much has, correctly, been made of the injuries and poor performance of their starting pitching. Many fans are deeply frustrated that they did not get some decent middle rotation guys instead of, seemingly, banking everything on Scherzer. Also a corner bat like Bryant at 1B would have been nice instead of Hosmer.
But their second half was OK-ish until Aug 11 (not keeping pace with the LA, SF but comfortably ahead in the WC2 race), whereupon they just stopped hitting for a month.
On Aug 10, they were 17 games over .500 (after 115 games, almost 3/4 the way through the season), 4.5 games ahead of the Reds and only 3 behind the Dodgers and 7 behind the Giants. Prior to winning their last two games of the Giants series, they were 5 over .500, 18 games behind the Dodgers and 19.5 behind the Giants. Their run differential dropped from +108 to +51.
During this stretch, their offense was dead last in the NL (and MLB) by wRC+ and fWAR, a trend that may have been broken by the last two games of the Giants series. Their pitching was mediocre during this run, dragged down by Darvish, Weathers, bullpen games/scrap heap signings and an imploding bullpen but buoyed by Snell and Musgrove.
But they just stopped hitting. Tatis’ return to SS seems to have helped. They need to limit Hosmer’s PA’s upon Cronenworth’s return. The offense has been somewhat under-performing all year but nothing prepared its fans for this collapse.
Wonder why the A’s are such a feast or famine franchise? On the chart above, they have two of the biggest collapses of the past decade. But the 2018 and the 2019 teams were both +.136 between the first and second halves. And the 2012 team was a remarkable +.198.
So in 5 of the past 9 years (not counting 2020), the A’s have had a big collapse or a big turnaround…
I find it really weird that the Red Sox, with a record 3 games below .500, have the AL’s third-worst record since July 30. It’s certainly not a good record, but to only have 2 teams worse than that is surprising.
The Padres were just never that good. Their 2020 offense and pitching came out of nowhere, and were obviously not sustainable, even before the pitching injuries. I don’t know why people fell for it, especially coming off a season of only 60 games.
It’s easy to see why people bought in: Preller made a lot of flashy moves, especially with pitching. They were a fun team to think about.
But I think a lot of the glaring issues were glossed over due to that excitement. I never once thought they were of a team as the media built them to be, but I also never thought the Giants were a 100-win team, either. That factor can’t get lost when we think about the 2021 Padres. They are a good baseball team (not great) who has two 100-win teams in their division.
Shouldn’t the Cubs be near the top of this list? Started 42-39 (.519) and 24-43 (.358) since for a .161 difference, though probably includes a couple losses since you ran the data.
Or is there a qualifier I missed?
Gah, it appears that there’s a qualifier *I * created without being aware of it, namely that the teams I considered only covered those on the first page of Stathead results, which is to say down to 44 wins, which captured this year’s Mets (44-37) but not the Cubs (42-39) or the Nationals (40-41). Washington (-.191) now has the biggest drop-off of this year’s teams, followed by the Padres (now -.169). Cubs (-.161, as you note), Mets (-.125), and Red Sox (-.117).
As it’s an intermediate result, I’m only going to bang my head agains the desk a few times before moving on, but will keep an eye on these teams with an eye towards circling back, particularly if the Padres or Nationals (or Cubs, for that matter) wind up atop the list.
Thanks. This is a lot easier to notice when you’re a Cubs fan whose team spent most of April, May, and June in first place then lost 12 in a row (6 to end the first half, 6 to start the second) and then had another 12 game losing streak after the deadline.
It’s even worse if you cherry pick at 75 games, before the first 12 game losing streak.
The season isn’t over, but might have 5 of the top 13 worst falloffs, albeit only over a decade.
On the other end of the spectrum, The Cardinals have gone from a low of 1.3% chance to make the playoffs on August 8 all the way up to 41.7% after beating the Padres tonight.
A lot people around here thought the projections on the Padres’ starting pitching staff were quite rosy. They assembled a lot of big names, but none of those dudes have consistent full-season track records of success. All that being said they might still squeak in, and then who knows.
Remarkable that in NY the story, somehow, has not been how badly Baez (and Lindor) crashed and burned in the month following the deadline during which time the Mets went from a 41.3% chance at the postseason to a 0.5% shot.
July 31-Aug 30:
Baez, .210/.258/.452
Lindor .167/.167/.292
At least there’s not much time left on that Lindor deal…
Wait…