The Surprisingly Complex World of Minor League Contracts
I obviously don’t have access to MLB Trade Rumors’ site traffic data, so it’s an educated guess that “[Team] Signs [Player] To a Minor League Contract” pieces are among their least trafficked pages. I get it. Big trades and big free agent acquisitions are exciting. Some vet trying to hang on and being given another chance? Not so much. That said, the world of minor league contracts for veterans is one that I was very close to during my time in baseball. The first time I was given the assignment of negotiating these deals, I thought they would be simple. I quickly learned they were anything but. Unless something dramatic and unexpected happens in terms of the labor negotiations between the league and the players, spring training is close. With an unprecedented number of free agents still out there, plenty of these types of deals are being negotiated as we speak, so it’s a good time to get into what it takes to get a deal over the line.
Opportunity
The crux of any minor league contract negotiation is opportunity. Players don’t want to be in the minor leagues. The focus is on playing in the majors, and which potential employer gives them the best chance to spend significant time in the big leagues. The reasons are obvious. They get paid like big leaguers, they accrue service time, and the perks (better per diems, charter flights, opulent hotels, palatial clubhouses) are phenomenal.
Agents don’t talk about money or contract clauses first, they talk about the possibility of their player being with the big league club. I would imagine that every Quad-A shortstop right now has his agent in touch with the Reds, while avoiding clubs like the Mets, Padres and others where the position is filled by a star-level talent who tends to stay on the field. Agents for these players become depth chart aficionados, studying every team’s situation across various position families to see where their player might slide in.
Personally, I always tried to be honest with agents and players with regards to said opportunity. Sometimes a team is offering the player a real chance to break camp with the big club; sometimes they are clearly a depth piece meant to bide their time at Triple-A until someone gets hurt or drastically underperforms. And yes, sometimes you do find yourself in direct contact with players. I always appreciated the conversations, and thought it spoke well of the player on a makeup level, as the individual was personally invested in the process.
Beyond the chances to play in the big leagues, clubs need to sell potential roster pieces on the additional benefits of joining the team. For the Astros, the player development system and the club’s ability to communicate data-based improvements was a big part of the pitch. Often players wanted to speak to someone more important than the negotiator, like the GM or field manager, just to hear assurances from the source themselves.
Money Isn’t Everything
Big league deals are actually quite simple in comparison to minor league contracts. Sure there are the occasional no-trade clauses or opt outs to discuss, but more the most part, it’s all about the years and the money. If you offer more years or more money, you’re often going to get the player.
But when it comes to minor league deals, money is often the last thing talked about and is rarely negotiated much if at all. For the most part, veteran minor league free agents earn a salary in the $20,000-30,000 per month range. MLB has recently gone from a monthly to a weekly pay structure, but teams still think in the monthly terms, leading to awkward rates like $5,833.33/week ($25,000 divided by 30, multiplied by seven days). I’ve seen rates higher than that, with some eclipsing $35,000 a month, but again, this is consistently the easiest piece of the puzzle in terms of getting deals done. True veterans with more than six years of major league service time get additional protection from the CBA in the form of a $100,000 retention bonus should they still be with the club on a minor league deal in late-March just prior to the end of spring training.
There are two other pure salary structures to reach agreement on. The first is big league pay. When signing a minor league free agent deal with no service time, most players are going to be fine with the major league minimum, which will be $570,500 in 2021, assuming full pay. Players with big league experience get a bit more. Those coming off multiple years exclusively at the big league level can get into the seven figure range. Some players look to add on with incentives based on time spent in the majors (usually measured by plate appearances for position players or games for pitchers), and teams are often happy to oblige them under the theory that if the player actually contributes that much to the major league squad, they’ll be well worth those kind of numbers, which are dwarfed by the money spent on established players.
The final money piece that few outside of baseball have even heard of is “Paragraph 2” salary, more commonly referred to as P2 money. P2 salary is how much the player will make if he reaches the big leagues and then is optioned back (and accepts said option) to the minors. It’s usually a small bump from the player’s beginning minor league rate, and it’s almost never a sticking point in negotiations.
Again, negotiations on salary are rare and when they do happen, they tend to be quite easy. The player might be one of several indistinguishable guys of a certain type (extra outfielder, catcher, bullpen arm, etc.) the club has interest in, so dollar terms are non-negotiable. If the first player on your list doesn’t accept, you move on down the list. If a player really stands out within a group and is a primary target, teams are often happy to move a bit on the money, as those shifts are usually in the five-figure range, as opposed to the multi-million dollar adjustments that bigger free agent negotiations require.
The Devil Is In the Details
It’s in the nitty gritty pieces, the contracts clauses, that getting a deal done comes down to. This is where the most work is done in terms of both discussions and preparing a contract.
The easiest clause is the NRI, or non-roster invitation. Every veteran-level minor league free agent wants one, and every team is almost certainly apt to provide it. Teams enter spring training with 55-65 players on the big league side, and managers often want more as they ease their regulars back into the grind. Having someone around with been there, done that experience to start is never an issue.
The most difficult clauses to come to an agreement on, mostly due to all of the variation, are those concerning assignment and release, which fall under the general term of opt outs. The basics are that a player can request to be added to the 25- or 40-man roster by a certain date, and the team then has 48-72 hours to honor that request or release him from the contract with no further obligation from either side. Simple enough, but the hangups come from the dates, with both the player and team perhaps looking for earlier or later timeframes depending on the situation. Beyond the simple opt out, players can ask for related clauses that allow them to search out 25- or 40-man rosters spots with other teams, either through their agent, or at times by requesting that the club they sign with inform other teams of the player’s availability should such an opportunity exist. If a team has a roster spot for the player, the player’s current team has a two or three day window to match the roster assignment or allow the player to sign elsewhere; no harm, no foul.
The player might ask for a date prior to the end of spring training, thinking, “I either make this team, or I’m outta here.” That might be just fine with the club if the player is just being seen as depth for Opening Day, not to mention that at times it saves the retention bonus mentioned above). At other times, the club might want to move the date back if the player represents a more long-term insurance policy. And the reverse might be true if the team wants an earlier date and vice versa if the player is looking for the insurance of at least having a paying gig.
Finally, there is the Foreign Inquiry Language, or FIL. Players in the minors are often interested in going to foreign leagues (predominantly NPB and the KBO) for the opportunity to make guaranteed money that is usually more than the big league minimum. While I’ll cover the details of how a signed player ends up going to Asia in a future piece, at the most basic level there is a negotiated transfer fee paid to the club by the NPB or KBO team to release the player from their contract. FIL provides a figure the club must accept should an offer come from a KBO or NPB team. Usually in the $150,000-$200,000 range, if that offer is on the table, the MLB club is required to provide the player the choice of working out a deal with the foreign club, which often has already been done by their agent behind the scenes.
We are in the home stretch of what has been one of the strangest offseasons in the history of baseball. The number of free agents still on the board as the calendar flipped to February is galling, and with owners holding tight to the purse strings except for the super-est of superstars, many players who entered November expecting a big league deal are instead going to find themselves involved in smaller, but much more complicated negotiations.
If you have any questions, I’ll keep an eye on the comments and respond there.
Kevin Goldstein is a National Writer at FanGraphs.
Thanks for the article! Yeah, admittedly this was a large part a slap in the face, especially the P2 salary part.
Great article, thanks Kevin. Two questions if any time or interest:
How, if at all, might the reorganization of minor league baseball affect these contract dynamics? Fewer jobs = more players looking for work = more leverage for clubs too simplistic? I imagine the effect on major league veterans slotting into AAA may be less pronounced than the rest of the minor league pool?
Also, you noted that the number of free agents still on the board is “galling.” Agreed, and galling is a word that might be used to express emotions from really annoyed to downright infuriated. Would you say your view of clubs’ posture toward free agents this season is closer to annoyed or infuriated, or other?
Thanks for the article!
I think for these veteran deals, not much will change. Teams need depth, players need some assurances, and as stated above, the money is really just a drop in the bucket when compared to a big league payroll. As for the number of free-agents, I guess I’m not annoyed and infuriated as much as I just look at it and say “of course.”
Did MLB put a Max on players under contract for the Clubs? What are the minor league roster sizes.
It’s 25 at the upper levels and larger in rookie-ball, but most teams use the IL to rotate a bigger bullpen in and out.
Did you ever have any interesting opt-out disputes like what happened with Mesoraco and the Mets, where the agent didn’t have the right to refuse assignment included in the written contract?
Nothing like that certainly. Sometimes agents get a bit aggressive to search out for opportunities with other teams without the current club’s knowledge. It’s one of those decriminalized things that nobody gets too upset about.
Can you go into detail on specific minor league free agent deals you negotiated with the Astros? What negotiating factors was the player most focused on?
Thanks!
It would be bad form to talk about specific deal. Not fair to the players involved. Hope you understand. As I said, more often than not, the thing you nearly always end up talking about the most is thing thing that doesn’t even end up in the contract — the opportunity aspect.
Wow, this is incredible content. Excited to see the next writeups to come!!!
Much appreciated.
Are there limits on the amount of money paid in a minor-league contract? As an example, let’s say that Rich Hill signs so late that neither he nor the team thinks he will be ready for Opening Day on a normal ramp-up schedule and don’t want to risk pushing him given his injury history. Could he sign at six-or-seven-figure minor-league deal so that his new team wouldn’t have to use a 40-man roster slot until they called him up?
What a fun question. I’m not 100% sure, but I’m fairly certain there is no upper bound, but I can’t see your theoretical Hill deal working for the team or the player. He’d almost certainly find a 40-man gig at a lower rate filled with PBs (performance bonuses).
Thanks. I realized I made a mistake in my question; I meant a seven-or-eight-figure deal, with the idea being that he was taking the highest offer out there
There are so many other things tied to being a major leaguer (in terms of what the CBA provides) that it would be really difficult for the minor league contract to equal it in security even with similar pay
It’s kind of a neat ‘play with roster size rules’ idea, but in practice a player in that situation can get a 40 man slot and immediately go in the IL for 26 or 40-man space depending how much rampup they think is necessary
Players and agents wisely would be quite reluctant to give up the protections of the CBA itself, which you don’t enjoy when you’re not on a major league contract. Think in terms of benefits, healthcare, rehab, etc.
Thanks for the awesome article Kevin! I’ve always been interested in content from “behind the curtain” and will be looking forward to your future pieces that bring some more of the hidden baseball interactions out into the open!
Great to hear. Feel free to make suggestions on things you might be wondering about.
lol this is so random and i doubt this is whole-separate-article-worthy, but ive always been curious if trade negotiations sometimes (a lot of the time?) happen like that scene in moneyball where theyre trying to get rincon at the deadline. is it really like “hey steve its billy. you can have this guy for this guy. you have 5 minutes.[hangup]”?
ive always assumed that was dramatized for the movie (and that trades are discussed for a while with multiple interactions before actually happening) but i suppose its possible trades could just materialize out of thin air in minutes between gms like that.
maybe an entire article on the minute details of trade negotiations would be interesting to people here? i know id love it. great article!
Definitely will talk a lot about how trades go (or more often do NOT) go down in the future. I’ve spoken to Meg about these kind of pieces, and we’ve agreed to try to line them up with the time these things are actually happening. To answer your question, yes. I’ve seen trades get done in five minutes, I’ve seen trades take three months, and I’ve definitely seen trade negotiations that feature some kind of ‘time expiration’ aspect.
I guess it’s not applicable anymore, but I was always curious when/how teams made the decision to go over the international pool before the hard cap.
You’re right, it’s really not applicable, but it’s fun. I worked for the team that spent over $30 million one year. With the way the rules were at the time, if you were going to go over, the dam was broken and there was just no disincentive for going WAY over.
An article I didn’t know I wanted, thanks! Apropos of Ben’s article this morning, is there anything we don’t know about how teams value opt outs? Possible future article?
It’s really player specific. As I wrote about, there are players who went end-of-spring training opt outs so they can get out of there if they are not breaking camp with the big league club. There are times when the teams wants that as well as the Triple-A roster has a real prospect at that player’s position so it’s make it or go home. Other times, you want to push that opt out date back because the player is a clear backup plan number one for you and will get called up first should somebody get banged up.
Useful.
Thank you.
Kevin, this is a really interesting read. Looking forward to more pieces like this. It’s really great to have you back on the media side of things and I can’t wait for the podcast.
Kevin.
This was an interesting article in that it provided some behind the scenes detail.
However, you didn’t name a single player in the article.
I know that you consider it bad form to do this, but in the other articles we read on this site (where most of the authors have not been baseball insiders), names help to provide context. Of course, they don’t have the insider experience you do so this doesn’t weigh on their mind (as much, if at all).
How do you plan to navigate providing specific information on individuals (which helps to provide context through example) with what you consider to be bad form?
For a piece like this, it’s really not my place to talk about specific negotiations with players, and I kept in more general for a that reason. I consider myself an exceptionally pro-player person, and when you are talking about these kind of deals, a lot of what players are looking for comes from highly personal places. I don’t think it would be fair to those players to discuss individual, specific circumstances. Those are my personal politics on issues like this.
I understand. It is just it would be more illustrative to provide concrete examples. I know your hands are tied, so to speak, and you are probably more apt to be generic rather than specific (especially considering how recently you were in MLB).
I am not saying you are wrong for doing that — I would as well. I guess my point was that this is likely a question you will have to ask yourself for almost every single article you write, while other writers at the site don’t have to do that. Do you see that as a challenge for the future you will have to navigate or is it something that is very clear/set in your mind?
Thanks for responding.
It doesn’t seem like a question Kevin has to ask himself every time. He’s already made his decision – he’s not sharing names.
Also, I think a clear difference between Kevin not sharing names and other FG authors sharing names is that Kevin had direct interactions with those players. As he said, some of them have discussed things that were spoken in confidence that they would not be shared. Meanwhile, the other authors either were given info that was on the record, or they don’t directly communicate with players and thus have no obligations to honor spoken or unspoken privacy agreements.
agree with this. also @brad is an article really *that* much more interesting if it says something like ‘chris archer wouldnt sign with us because we couldn’t guarantee him a spot in the rotation’ vs just ‘one veteran pitcher we wanted wouldnt sign with us because we couldn’t guarantee him a spot in the rotation’?? i mean yeah the first one is more gossip-y but its not like the story loses much without actual names.
Enjoyed the first article. I had no idea that the teams from the foreign leagues paid a transfer fee to MLB teams.
An idea for a future article would be the mechanics of how players are promoted/demoted in the minors. Do the teams pay for transportation, living arrangements, etc.
Good idea. Something for me to think about fleshing out a bit.
I was going to ask something similar to jsdspud, I think that’s an interesting topic. I assumed the US players who signed overseas were free agents (ex Tanaka this year), usually of the minor league/non-roster invite variety.
How often do KBO or NPB pay transfer fees to MLB clubs? Can you recall a recent instance, unless you feel providing the player’s name would be in bad form?
There’s going to be a whole piece about how players end up in Asia.
thank you for another excellent, in-depth article. became an ad-free member after this, your re-introduction piece, and the chat transcript. that transcript alone was jam packed with information well worth the price of admittance, and i am really looking forward to you getting into the super specific nitty gritty details like you did in this piece. welcome back!!!!
Thanks for joining!
I’m curious about how ML FA negotiations come together. Let’s say our team is interested in a player. What is discussed in the initial contact between FO and agent? Who initiates discussion on years/salary? If months occur in between initial contact and signing, what occurs in between?
Always starts with a ‘reach out.’ Hi Mr. Agent, we have interest in your player on a minor league deal. Sometimes they’re ready to start talking right then and there, sometimes they’re looking to play the waiting game and hoping that a 40-man deal is in their future. Sometimes you don’t hear from them again, sometimes you reconnect in January. It’s all over the board. And again, money is almost NEVER the first (or second) thing discussed.
Interesting! Thank you for the response.
Interesting read! Did you ever have an outrageous request from a foreign team? Like a prospect who was definitely way too good for you to want to let negotiate with a foreign club?
I’ll have a whole piece on players going to Asia down the road, but to answer your question no. Those teams really do their homework, and they know who might be available.
hey kevin, great to have you on board. regarding the fil, are teams more interested in signing guys who might have higher odds of going overseas for the transfer fee revenue or is the $$ just too inconsequential?
Yeah, it’s nice, and it let’s the owner know you are being fiscally conscious and all that jazz, but it’s never a strategy to try to sign a player in order to flip him to Asia.
I know that catching depth is valuable for an organization. Is there ever a situation where a catcher with MLB experience signs a minor league contract and agrees to the ML minimum if called up, but requests more than that while playing in the minors?
If you are talking about a big league veteran, he’s still going to get a rate above the minimum, it’s just standard practice. That said, those catchers with big league time do fetch the most in minor league pay as well. The example I wrote about that was more in the 35K/month range was a such a catcher.
This is a really great piece. I would be interested to learn more specifics regarding the issues you bring up in the second paragraph. What would be the lifestyle differences facing Quinton Quad-A as he splits his season between Fresno/Round Rock/Sugarland and Houston? Any info on hotels, travel, per diem, ancillary revenues and other perquisites would be appreciated.
Wow. More of this please.
What is the reasoning for a fringe big leaguer to sign a minor league deal early in the offseason? It seems there would be an incentive to wait at least a little while to see if he can get a better deal/big league deal.
Great stuff! Do players/agents often go into negotiations using the FIL as leverage if the ML club really wants them? Or in these cases are most players replacement level and the ML teams don’t really worry about losing a player to a Foreign League?
Thanks for writing this type of article. Can you share any odd & interesting specific contract requests? For example, things written in the contract on the level of which locker they get, or how far their locker is from another player on the team. Other examples: odd dietary negotiations, family related per diem or family access points, facial hair, media access, social media issues, etc