The Trade Deadline Winners, Losers … and a Few Surprises
An unusual season deserves an unusual trade deadline, and that’s what we got yesterday. With one-third of the league all but assured of a playoff spot, teams at the top were reticent to push in their chips for this season. There were a fair number of teams in the middle willing to take a chance on 2020, in contrast to the last few seasons. At the bottom, there were very few teams without a chance to win this season due to the expanded playoff format, which meant there wasn’t a whole lot to choose from for teams looking to get better this year. And while we won’t know the end result of these deals for at least a month (and, in the case of some of the players exchanged, perhaps for years), it doesn’t mean we can’t evaluate teams’ moves based on the information we have today.
With that, let’s get to it.
The Winners
Toronto Blue Jays
While some teams were looking to maximize value beyond the 2020 season, Toronto saw this year’s extra playoff spots as an opportunity and struck, without sending a ton of talent away. The team added two potential starters in Taijuan Walker and Robbie Ray, as well as a starter/swingman type in Ross Stripling. They traded for a nice utility player/stopgap starter in Jonathan Villar. They added to their tower of beef in the lineup with Daniel Vogelbach. Toronto was likely to make the playoffs without adding much, given their 76% playoff odds as we head into September. But with Matt Shoemaker and Nate Pearson sidelined, the club’s depth in the rotation was thinning. Ray and Stripling have struggled this season and Walker hardly provides guaranteed production, but they don’t all have to work out to prove useful to the Blue Jays. The starters added could end up providing strength out of the bullpen or help allow others, like Pearson, to come back in a reliever role and fortify the late-innings. While a playoff berth isn’t a lock, Toronto did what was necessary to shore up a flawed roster in the hopes of playing in October without sacrificing much of the future.
San Diego Padres
The Padres look pretty safe as far as a playoff spot goes, so they went a different route than the Blue Jays did, focusing more on players with team control beyond this season. Sure, they added Trevor Rosenthal and Mitch Moreland (who does have a 2021 option), but their big moves were focused on 2020 and beyond. When a team lands the best player traded at the deadline — and that’s what Mike Clevinger represents — we can expect a significant package of players to head the other way. The trade that netted the right-hander featured a large quantity of players going to Cleveland, and perhaps a few will flourish there, but none of those moved were top prospects, and all carry significant risk regarding their future production. The team ended up moving Taylor Trammell to Seattle in a package headlined by catcher Austin Nola; Trammell was the highest ranked prospect San Diego traded at the deadline, and he wasn’t in their top four. The Padres have enviable prospect depth and they used it to get one of the better pitchers in the game.
Those Clinging to Playoff Hopes
The cost to trade for players at this deadline doesn’t appear to have been great, and teams with a reasonable chance of making the playoffs were active. In addition to the Blue Jays in the American League, the Reds, Marlins, Rockies, Mets, Phillies, and Giants all made smaller moves to improve their teams’ chances of making the playoffs. The biggest moves in this group were the Marlins’ addition of Starling Marte (who has a reasonable option for 2021) and the Reds’ trade for Archie Bradley, who is also under team control for another season.
Those with No Playoff Hopes
It’s too early to know exactly what teams will get from the bevy of prospects and players to be named later who moved, but the Mariners were able to snag the best prospect traded in Trammell in exchange for Nola who, despite his performance this year and remaining control, is 30 and has a short track record. They also moved players who likely didn’t have a future with the club in Vogelbach and Walker. The Orioles are in the early stages of their rebuild, and the need to bulk up their minor league system is still pretty great. The team moved a host of relievers as well as Tommy Milone to try to add depth to their farm. The returns might not provide much in terms of major league production, but they made the moves they needed to. The Red Sox moved some relievers, but held on to Xander Bogaerts and Rafael Devers, which is a minor victory in their lost season.
The Losers
Teams Wanting Starting Pitching
Many of us thought that Lance Lynn and Dylan Bundy might be on the move, but both ended up staying with their respective teams. Lynn is under contract for next year for right around $10 million while Bundy has another year of arbitration at a likely lesser cost. There were rumors about the White Sox, Twins, Yankees, Dodgers, and Braves (among others) wanting starting pitching, and the idea of trading for players who could help in 2021 had to be appealing. Ultimately, teams must have found the cost to be too high. While the Rangers and Angels could certainly draw some criticism for failing to extract the highest possible value for either player, it isn’t as though those teams won’t want to compete next season. The Angels are still trying to surround Mike Trout with a playoff-team — they brought in Anthony Rendon last offseason with that purpose in mind. The Rangers tried to thread the needle this season and failed, but in the first full season at their new ballpark, they’ll probably want to have a winning team. Good starting pitchers help teams win, and there was little reason to deal players with remaining team control without a good amount of talent coming back.
Arizona’s 2021 Season
Even after the team traded Paul Goldschmidt ahead of the 2019 season, Arizona was still able to compete. It’s not entirely clear what their plans are for next year, but moving Marte, who has a reasonable option, and Archie Bradley isn’t a great sign that the D-backs plan to get better next season. They still have a lot of talented players, but even with Madison Bumgarner’s salary going up next season, the team has only around $50 million in salary commitments in 2021, about half what they were looking at after last winter. Perhaps the D-backs are going to use that financial flexibility this offseason, or look to their farm system for reinforcements (they check in at ninth in our rankings right now), but their trades seemed more of the cost-cutting variety, and with the Dodgers still the Dodgers and the Padres on the rise, a contending season for Arizona is going to be difficult without more talent.
The Surprises
- I think the Padres trading for a 30-year-old catcher with almost no track record — and giving up one of the better prospects in the game to do it — qualifies as a surprise and merits a deeper look into Austin Nola.
- The Rangers not moving Lance Lynn or Joey Gallo probably qualifies as a surprise, but hopefully signals their desire to compete next year.
- The White Sox not making more moves (they pulled off a minor swap for Jarrod Dyson last week) as they get back to the playoffs for the first time in 11 seasons is a bit curious given the moves they made in the offseason to compete this year. With a likely playoff spot already theirs, they didn’t have to make a move, but their trade deadline stands in sharp contrast with the Padres’, who were in a similar position.
- The Cleveland return for Mike Clevinger is certainly an odd one. There’s some benefit of the doubt heading Cleveland’s way given their track record of player development, but the return feels light compared to Clevinger’s talent and remaining team control — he won’t hit free agency for another two years after this one.
- The Brewers are typically active when they are in a playoff position, but were mostly absent from the deadline this year, only trading David Phelps for a trio of Players to be Named Later.
- The Cubs picking up a few relievers wasn’t a surprise, and even trading for Cameron Maybin wasn’t a huge move, but sending Albert Almora Jr. off the active roster is not a great signal for his future.
- The Astros have been one of most aggressive teams in deadlines past, but did nothing this year. The same was true for their opponent in last year’s World Series, the Washington Nationals.
The Non-Surprises
- The A’s filled a few holes at a low cost by trading for Tommy La Stella and Mike Minor.
- Tampa Bay traded away a player (José Martínez) who they traded for in the last year so they could get more playing time for a player they also acquired (Randy Arozarena) in the same trade as the one that netted them the player they traded away. They also added a defense-first outfielder (Brett Phillips).
- The Tigers traded Cameron Maybin.
- The Pirates didn’t have much to give to other teams, but did manage to get some international spending money for Jarrod Dyson in the aforementioned deal with the White Sox.
- Kansas City traded a reliever, but not enough relievers, and maybe Lucius Fox will end up in the majors.
- The Cardinals made no additions.
Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.
Saw some speculation that Mike Rizzo was more or less frozen as Nats GM because his own contract is expiring and, while he was obviously in a situation where he should have sold short-term assets, (a) he might be under pressure to perform to get extended (wasn’t a WS enough?), and (b) well, they don’t have a ton of short-term assets to sell. If the stars are off the table, who is on it? Gomes and Harris and Harrison I guess?
Kendrick, Suzuki probably could have gotten something back, and perhaps Eaton, but this would have taken a cold calculation. Boswell suggested no deals were done because they’re thinking of bringing at least some of the geriatrics back in 2021, and trading them would have messed with the aura.
All hail the Tower of Beef.
Hopefully they trend more towards Big Papi/Mo Vaughn vs. Rob Deer/Richie Sexson. Probably all unreasonable comps, lol.
Well, that didn’t age very well!
I sure hope those “cash considerations” they shipped out for Vogelbach aren’t anything the Blue Jays will miss, and that the Blue Jays execs didn’t skip out on family time to make that deal.
I wonder what some of these deadline deals say specifically about team strategy for winning a World Series in this (hopefully unique and never-again-seen) 2020 season. Beyond the actual players the Padres acquired, I believe they took advantage of several tactical items:
1. This is the first season in modern history without expanded September rosters – while the alternate site rosters help and can be reshuffled, MLB talent may be more valuable this September than before.
2. Playing so many games in your division means that you, and your opponents, are seeing the same pitchers over and over again in short time periods, which would seem to advantage the hitters on both teams…. unless a team overhauls its pitching staff with new arms.
3. More arms are needed with the prospect of so many games in so few days plus previously-unscheduled doubleheaders awaiting at every possible turn.
4. Having two quality catchers is an advantage with the prospect of so many games in so few days plus previously-unscheduled doubleheaders awaiting at every possible turn.
5. Optimizing 40-man roster space has been taken to a new level like a fantasy owner in a deep keeper league.
With regards to #2, in the AL, the playoff field is largely set. All that is going on there is jockeying for position. So teams keep seeing the same pitchers, but then suddenly most teams will be facing pitching they almost certainly haven’t seen since at least 2019. Maybe longer. For instance, Dallas Keuchel will probably get to face a team that hasn’t seen him since at least 2018 unless the White Sox open against the Twins or Indians. Rich Hill has been in the NL since 2016 before coming to the Twins.
Ask the 2007 Mets whether a team can blow a 7-game lead with two weeks to go… much less four weeks… there’s plenty of time for a cold snap to befell any current standings-leader. And the point is, taking advantage of refreshing your pitching staff decreases the likelihood that the teams you’re facing multiple times will have seen enough of the pitchers you previously threw. The strategy is about preserving a lead, and I think it holds true.
In addition, the odds of playing a division rival in the playoffs are higher than ever, since every division will have at least two teams in the playoffs, and some divisions will have three or four depending on how the wild cards break.
(In fact, given the clustering in the NL East, I’m most surprised that this wasn’t the division with significant pitching refreshes.)
Either way, the Padres play in the NL 🙂 In the NL, 12 of 15 teams have 40% of better postseason odds as of this morning. I’d say that’s ripe for finding a tactical advantage to get in.
Somehow the Tigers keep playing competitive baseball. I don’t see how they can keep it up, but at least in the standings they have a legit chance to sneak in. I would not be surprised to see a currently top 8 AL team fall out. There’s still enough time for stuff to happen in baseball.
3. More arms are needed with the prospect of so many games in so few days plus previously-unscheduled doubleheaders awaiting at every possible turn.
The more I think about it, this is the area where the Padres nailed it. They have multiple guys who can and will close out games, and have experience closing out games this year. That means they can mix and match based on batter skillsets in a given 7th or 9th inning, as well as know that they have other options available to close if someone has pitched on consecutive days or closed out the first game of a double-header.
The Mets would have 4-5 more wins, literally, if they had even a passable second option behind Lugo given Diaz’s ineffectiveness.
Meanwhile, the Padres just picked up the Mariners closer and he’s probably 4th in line for saves at best, behind Pomeranz, Rosenthal and Pagan… and then they have Strahm, Stammen, Adams and Altavila… it’s like they have a 2-deep of 7th/8th/9th inning guys, which is just silly.
Yankees are definite losers. The rotation is 3 deep at the moment, the bullpen is short, and the lineup has too many injuries. They could have easily picked up a bench bat type or someone like Archie Bradley. They didn’t have to get Lance Lynn (supposedly they price was 2 of Clint Frazier, Deivi Garcia, and Clarke Schmidt), but not getting anyone really sucks. They have to hope one of the young kids steps up in the rotation because even if Paxton comes back, there won’t be enough time to stretch him out. To have only three reliable starters is gonna be tough in the postseason. I suppose there’s a chance Deivi or Schmidt can make an impact but throwing rookies into a pennant race is rarely a good idea though Deivi did shove against the Mets.
The bullpen will be gassed quickly like we saw last year. And that was with a healthy Tommy Kahnle. At least they have Cole to go deep into games and save the bullpen for a game in the postseason. I love Tanaka and Montgomery but they’re more 5 and fly type guys. Ottavino has been shaky this year. It’s really just Green, Chapman, and Britton who they can really rely on. Loasiga is good, but do you trust him? Then it’s pretty much assorted crap in Holder, Heller, Cessa, etc.
The window with this core is closing soon and it would have been nice to see more urgency.
The Diamondbacks’ moves seem a little curious, but I’m surprised there weren’t more teams trying dump absolutely anyone signed for multiple years. I think this season was tenable because it was thought it would be an exception and all of the off-season maneuvering was already done by time the pandemic hit; but if teams don’t think there will be fans in the stands next season , the whole financial structure of the players & league is going to go through a very painful shock.
Maybe some teams were trying to dump salary, but which teams were willing to be buyers?
Because of the playoff format, it seemed like there were more interested buyers this year than previous years.
I think it was the Rangers’ GM that made a comment about how their salary will be lower next year, which struck me as super-odd because they moved into a new ballpark and usually teams spend a bunch when they move to a new ballpark. But if no one can go to that new ballpark…
posted this in the wrong article
If you revise the Maybin note as ‘Cameron Maybin got traded,’ you won’t have to revise that bullet next year (unless he finally retires).
Not sure about Atlanta’s thinking. Are Tomlin/Erlin/Milone more trustworthy than Taijuan or Minor? Are either of Folty/Newcomb close to fixed? Touki or Wright? Anderson pitched great, but will he keep it up? That starting staff looks to have the ability to implode their season.
Alex Anthopoulos was thinking that the price for starting pitching in terms of talent was more than he wanted to pay. So Atlanta is going to have to fix its rotation with internal options.
The lineup and the bullpen are solid, so the starting rotation is really all they need to fix. Fried has become the ace people thought he could be, and it looks like Anderson is major league ready. Send them out every five days. Get some starts from Tomlin, Erlin and Milone, and maybe open a bullpen game or two with Ynoa.
Cole Hamels is eligible to come off the IL on September 6, but the question will be whether he’s ready. Folty has been making progress building himself back up at the ATS. Newcomb, Toussaint, and Wright may all get shots at getting back into the rotation.
Even with the problems with the rotation, the Braves have a 21-14 record, with 25 games to go, 8 against the Nationals, 7 against the Marlins, 3 against the Mets, 4 against the Red Sox, 3 against the Orioles. Aside from the Marlins, all the other teams are below .500. If one or two guys step up, the Braves will run away with the division. Even if no one steps up, the Braves will probably run away with the division. The bullpen will just have to pitch more innings.
This article was a bit premature in my opinion as we don’t know the value of most “PTBNL”. In the Jays case I would already say they are losers dealing Conine and Williams + for Villar (1 month, average infielder) and Stripling, that doesnt even account for the PTBNL they gave up for a month of Walker who was the best player acquired.
Honestly, I don’t think you can write this article now. Sometimes people say you can only pick winners and losers when you know how the prospects turned out, but this goes way, way beyond that–this picks winners and losers before we even know who the prospects ARE. The players to be named later are just guys who aren’t on the 60-man roster–it’s not like normal where they aren’t usually meaningful.
Kansas City has a prospect named after a Batman character?
Atlanta has a 1B with the same name as DC’s Captain Marvel Jr.
Well, that didn’t age very well!
It’s true, Victor Fries has a brutal changeup that hitters don’t know what to do with.
I kind of expected a little more analysis. I was expecting a team-by-team review to see who FG’s thought won and lost. This reminds of the ‘who own the off-season’ articles, where writers all view the team with the most and most expensive acquisitions as the winners. But never speculate on the long-term value that they’ve created or destroyed.
Craig Edwards is usually much better than this. Something as simple as the best 5 trades and the worst 5 trades might’ve been more interesting.
As kAthryn explAined i’m impressed thAt some one Able to get pAid $4027 in 1 month on the computer. hAve you seen this website…getbiz3.comB please don’t copy”Ⓡ” In Url Thanks