The Worst Offensive Month in Royals Team History

I didn’t realize the Royals have lost nine games in a row. When it’s come to disappointing baseball, most of my attention was focused on teams like the Blue Jays, Giants, Mets, and Mariners. Every team mentioned here has under-performed, but sure enough, the Royals stand at 7-16, with baseball’s worst record. The upside, I suppose, is that they were once 7-7, but that’s damning with faint praise, since losing nine straight can derail even a wonderful season. The Royals have had a horrible week and a half.

As you examine things, it’s not like the Royals have experienced some kind of team-wide collapse. The defensive metrics paint a confusing picture, and the rotation has been better than the bullpen, but the Royals’ run prevention has surprisingly been a tiny bit better than average. The Royals aren’t out there just constantly getting smoked. Nearly the entirety of the problem is captured by the headline just above. Hitting. Teams need to hit. The Royals haven’t hit. It’s not unreasonable to suggest they’ve actually hit worse than ever.

The Royals are tied for seventh in terms of fewest runs allowed. They’re perfectly even with both the Orioles and the Phillies. However, the Royals are dead last in runs scored, and that doesn’t paint the whole picture, because the team in second-to-last place has outscored the Royals by 24. The difference between the Royals and 29th place is the same as the difference between 29th place and 14th. Here’s every offense in baseball, for April, expressed in average runs per game:

Maybe if I’d slept more, or had something different to eat, this article would be a happy one, about the Nationals. There’s a story at the front of that plot, but there’s also a story at the back, with the Royals so far behind the Giants. It’s been a problem of both reaching base, and advancing after having reached. Baseball-Reference tracks a stat that measures the percentage of baserunners that eventually score. There’s a clear relationship between this plot and that one above.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

The Royals have scored just 20% of their baserunners. That’s five points behind the next-worst team, 10 points behind the average team, and an incredible 19 points behind the best team. How have the Nationals already outscored the Royals by more than 100 runs? Pick something an offense can do well. The Nationals have done that thing better than the Royals have. I haven’t actually fact-checked the extent to which that statement is true, but I’m pretty comfortable assuming it holds up without looking at the full scope of the data. One offense has been a juggernaut. The other has been a juggernaught nevermind, that’s terrible

The Royals have existed as a major-league franchise since 1969. Using the Baseball-Reference Play Index, searching through the Royals’ whole history yields 287 individual months. Here I’ve plotted all of those months in terms of average runs per game, divided by league-average average runs per game. So, a mark of 100% would mean the Royals scored runs for the given month at an average rate. A higher number means more runs, and a lower number means fewer runs.

The Royals’ run-scoring in April finished at 62% of the league average. That’s their third-worst-ever mark, behind April 1972 (60%) and April 1981 (50%). However, in those months, the Royals played just 14 and 13 games, respectively. In *this* April, the Royals played 23 games. So it was their worst-ever offensive month for a month in which they played at least 15 times. To look at that in a related way, but in a way that strips out some of the noise, here’s a plot of OPS against league average. I just took the Baseball-Reference stat of sOPS+ and expressed it instead as a rate.

By OPS compared to the average, the Royals just finished April at 68%. That’s their worst-ever mark by five percentage points, beating out August 2005. The Royals had never hit so poorly. Don’t get me wrong, the Royals had hit very poorly, but this was probably their worst calendar month. And this is not a ballclub with a short history. It took some effort to come out this bad.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say it was one of the worst months of all time. Shifting to the more familiar wRC+, the Royals finished April at 65. That’s quite bad, but since 2002 — which is as far back as our splits leaderboard goes — there have been 23 worse offensive months. In April 2004, the Expos somehow posted a 37 wRC+, and they scored runs at just 39% of the league-average rate. In April 2003, the Tigers posted a 39 wRC+. As recently as June 2014, the Padres achieved a 40 wRC+. They scored runs at 55% of the league-average rate. The Royals have made team history, but I don’t want to exaggerate.

Now, there is one thing, though, I can’t just let go by. How have the Royals scored so few of their baserunners? With the bases empty, they’re 25th in wRC+, at 78. But with runners in scoring position, they’re in last, with a wRC+ of — wait for it — 16. 16! That’s the third-worst month since 2002, again using that splits leaderboard. I recognize that this post is just number after number after number, but there’s no superior alternative. In April 2004, those Expos had a laughable wRC+ of 6 with runners in scoring position. In September 2002, the Tigers had a 14 wRC+ in the same situations. Then you get the April 2017 Royals. 16. Very obviously, the Royals are not truly that bad. Very obviously, they’ll improve, because every terrible performance is likely to regress up.

It’s just, this isn’t just any team. This is the Royals, and the Royals seemingly came into the season with a limited margin of error. I know all about the recent history of the Royals and projections and expectations, but this didn’t look like a strong ballclub. It still doesn’t, and now the Royals have dug for themselves a deep hole. Never mind the Indians. The Royals are already six games out of the second wild-card position. And, sure, Jorge Soler will appear eventually, and he’ll slug some dingers, but there’s been so much more bad news than good. Eric Hosmer‘s doing nothing. Alex Gordon’s doing nothing. Brandon Moss is doing nothing, as the Royals have just about wasted a Mike Moustakas power surge. Talent remains, but all the worrying questions about the Royals are still there, with greater urgency and intensity. There’s so little room for anything else to go wrong.

There’s an argument to be made that, right now, no other baseball team is in a worse position. There are, of course, counter-arguments. It’s nothing that’s certain, that’s set in stone. But a nine-game losing streak locked in a miserable April in which the Royals didn’t hit. And if they don’t start hitting some pitching soon, the necessity will shift toward having to hit on some trades. Trades that would be fairly difficult for the ballclub to stomach.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
noeckerrMember since 2016
9 years ago

Hosmer has grounded into 7 double plays, trailing only Solarte and Puig, with 8.

The Kudzu KidMember since 2016
9 years ago

I’m stunned that four of the five bottom teams in terms of runs scored are AL teams.

Twitchy
9 years ago

I’m surprised this wasn’t about the Jays.

RoyalsFan#14321
9 years ago

I don’t expect Moose’s BB% to remain so low… he might get better as the season goes.

(silver linings)

Max Power
9 years ago

Yeah, it’ll be much higher when he’s on the Cardinals hitting between Fowler and Carpenter.

evo34Member since 2023
9 years ago

Part of the issue appears to be batted ball luck, as the Royals’ xOPS is 0.687 (vs. .606 actual). Still below average hitting, no matter how you slice it.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Well boys, it was a good run but unless you’re willing to give hometown discounts think it’s time to break up the band. If anyone wants you.

Six Ten
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Moustakas and Cain will fetch reasonable returns (one good prospect or two middling ones, I’d bet). If Vargas keeps doing what he is until near the trade deadline, a marginal playoff team with pitching holes will probably return at least a little value for him. Hosmer needs to do a LOT between now and then to be worth anything at all; teams with holes big enough at first base that he represents an improvement right now are rarely in contention. You’d have to send a prospect to get someone to take Escobar. The real question is whether trading Herrera is a good move.

My guess is they’ll wait until the end of May to make a choice. If the team recovers a bit, they’ll wait until the end of June. And it’ll just keep going like that. Moore adamantly doesn’t want to give up on this group yet.

JS7
9 years ago

Kansas City runs scored = 63
Harper, Eaton & Zimmerman runs scored = 78

ericdykstra
9 years ago

With average defense, the position players would be below replacement level as a team.

White Jar
9 years ago

Alcides Escobar has a .200 OBP and has scored 4 runs. Wasn’t his entire appeal in his heyday his speed and ability to create runs on the bases? Zero steals. Why is he playing?

Psychic... Powerless...
9 years ago

I thought juggernaught was wonderful, not terrible.

Doorknob11
9 years ago

Sounds a lot like the rangers last year (year before?) when they won a game it was by 1 or 2 but when they lost they got smoked so their run differential was extremely low.

AlexLaBMember since 2023
9 years ago

You know what they say: once you hit rock bottom… uhh