The Worst Pitches in Baseball This Year

Geoff Burke-USA TODAY Sports

Last Friday, Davy Andrews put Aaron Judge into context. That’s fun for the usual reasons – “Wow, look how dominant Aaron Judge is!” never gets old. But his final conclusion – Judge hits like most batters do when opponents hang a bad slider middle-middle – got me thinking. We have a pitch-level model that estimates the worst pitches. Can we use it to get an idea of what it looks like to throw a pitch so bad it turns your opponents into Judge-esque offensive producers?

There’s an easy way to sort this out. When you look at a pitcher’s player page here at FanGraphs, you can see how we model each pitch. There are a ton of scores, but I’m going to be focusing on PitchingBot today, for reasons I’ll explain shortly. The player pages break each pitch down by command and stuff. In our internal database, it’s even better: You can look at any individual pitch and get a grade on it. I set out to find the worst pitches on the year to see whether they made hitters look invincible.

Ironically, the worst pitch thrown this year made the batter look extremely vincible. Here it is in all its glory:

Yikes! PitchingBot assigns grades for each component, and it’s not hard to understand why this one got a poor command grade. If you only threw pitches like that, you’d never record an out. Poor James McCann — trust me, the ball hit the bat before he ducked out of the way — but that’s the only outcome that isn’t a disaster. Otherwise, it’s a ball or a hit batter.

All of the worst pitches this year are some variation of that, which tracks. Throw a cement mixer slider down the pipe, and there are still plenty of ways it can work out. The batter could take it, or foul it off. They could smash it directly to a fielder. Miss the strike zone by a matter of feet, and none of that is possible.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

To get at the actual worst pitches in baseball this year, we’ll have to eliminate those obvious balls. New rules: The pitch has to be around the strike zone. The very worst pitches are all wild misses. I left those out and queried the model again. Here’s the new worst pitch in baseball this year:

Oh, right. We didn’t exclude position players pitching. Andrew Knizner’s pitch there graded out terribly on our stuff models, and rightfully so – 53 mph and right down the middle. But that’s not a real pitch, and I’m not even sure that the model knows what to do with an input that’s so unlike actual competitive offerings. Let’s add a new filter and only look at pitches thrown 70 mph or harder. Here’s the new worst pitch in baseball this year:

Wait, what? That pitch looked pretty good! What was Jesús Sánchez going to do with it? The reason it grades out so poorly is almost all down to location. Very few batters swing at pitches that are both high and off the plate inside. That one notwithstanding, it generally doesn’t work out well for the pitcher.

One thing I learned as I combed through these pitches is that when you drill down to a single pitch, command makes pitches much worse than stuff. It makes sense when you stop and think about it, but it still sounds wrong. Okay then, let’s recalibrate. We’re looking for pitches in the strike zone now.

Here’s the new set of criteria: We want pitches in the zone, thrown 70 mph or harder. I want to find meatball-y meatballs, pitches that are bad because they don’t break enough and are thrown too slowly. With that criteria sorted, we can finally get to some actually bad pitches. Here’s the new worst pitch of the year:

Yeah, that one fits. When you think of a duel between Justin Verlander and Nolan Arenado, you probably picture a ton of high fastballs getting fouled off or cut under. But sometimes Verlander just throws a clunker. That pitch had about half the horizontal break of a normal Verlander slider, with the movement instead translating to backspin. It fell five inches less than his average slider this year. In other words, it was a hanger. It had a terrible grade for both stuff and location. Sure, Arenado missed it, but you can look at that pitch and understand what pitching models are doing.

Here’s the second-worst pitch of the year, and wow, this one is a howler:

The model didn’t actually hate Caleb Thielbar’s location; in 0-0 counts, throwing the ball right down the middle isn’t a disaster. On the other hand, it hated the pitch itself. I see why. If you’re going to throw a slow curveball, you need more downward movement than that. By starting it so high, the pitch kind of lollipopped out of Thielbar’s hand, which made it fall less and with a less negative approach angle.

Here’s a weird fact: The nine worst pitches by this criteria all produced good results for the pitcher. There were four foul balls and five outs. But don’t worry, there are some pretty bad pitches that resulted in thunderously positive results for hitters:

This is a great example of location and stuff combining to make a pitch bad. That pitch wasn’t completely awful; it had roughly average movement relative to Nick Avila’s seasonal average. But in a 1-2 count, you can’t lob a slow pitch over the middle and expect the hitter to take. A bad time for a bad location on an average-ish pitch can still work out to “very bad” overall.

Let’s get one last example of that combination failure. Here’s Nick Anderson missing his target in an advantageous count:

There’s a lot to dislike here. The pitch was supposed to be off the plate away, but Anderson left it in a very hittable location instead. That was also an awful fastball. It fell five inches more than Anderson’s normal heater, right into Jordan Westburg’s bat path. It ended up as straight as can be – it had less tail than his regular offering and was three ticks slower. That’s just a tremendously bad fastball, and in a bad location given the count. Maybe you can get away with missing one early in the count when a hitter might be looking elsewhere. With two strikes, Westburg was always going to swing at it, and this is not the kind of pitch you want a batter swinging at.

In the end, that’s capturing a lot of what Davy was looking at when he compared hanging sweepers to Judge’s overall offensive production. The worst pitches in baseball this year, as measured by our stuff model, are mostly balls. But if you strip those out, and remove position players pitching while you’re at it, you’re left with combination failures, pitches that hung up in dangerous locations.

What’s the point of all of this? To some extent, I’m just enjoying asking the model open-ended questions like “Which pitch do you like least?” and seeing what it says. I’m also curious, though. What does a bad pitch look like in the eyes of the computer? Luckily, a lot of it is fairly intuitive. Hanging breaking balls, slow fastballs that don’t have enough ride, and wildly missed locations. A pitching coach could have told you that years ago. Now, we just have the data to say the same. And of course, Aaron Judge would wallop these pitches, too, just so we’re clear.





Ben is a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @benclemens.

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
NATS FanMember since 2018
1 year ago

Good article Ben

brood550
1 year ago

Good read and lots of fun.

I gotta ask. How bad did that Gausman fastball rate that Judge destroyed for 117.5mph exit velo and 477ft on August 2nd? The video of that pitch makes it look like it was a 2-seamer that hung and broke right into Judge’s swing path.

Last edited 1 year ago by brood550
brood550
1 year ago
Reply to  Ben Clemens

Thank you for the reply and explanation. 🙂

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
1 year ago

Here’s a weird fact: The nine worst pitches by this criteria all produced good results for the pitcher. There were four foul balls and five outs.

Folks can go on about deterministic results all they want. How pitchers exert control over batted balls, or how of course batters can aim. They can even talk about how clubhouse chemistry is the real reason why a team won or lost a 3-game playoff series.

But in the end Tyche really does reign supreme.

Doug LampertMember since 2016
1 year ago

I suspect that hitters miss on a lot of these bad pitches, simply because they’re EXPECTING movement. Hitting is mostly reflex, there simply isn’t time for a significant concious decision cycle, and if a hitter sees a pitcher deliver a slider say, he swings for roughly where he expects a slider to go and tries to adjust to the actual motion.

It’s the same way an ephus pitch can work and the reason fast-pitch softball pitchers can throw past MLB batters when it’s tried, the batter simply is not used to that.

I am still curious, what criteria on selecting pitches from the computer would give a set that produced Aaron Judge like production on average. Obviously, horrible misses would do it, because even Judge is nowhere close to the value of a 1.000 OBP, but is there a critiria by which strikes have that effect on average?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
1 year ago

This is a good example of the near-impossibility of predicting a single event, but when we zoom out to predict a game, a series, or a season it’s a whole lot easier. Kind of like how it seems nearly impossible to predict the weather but models of climate change do pretty well. Pitchers with bad pitch metrics typically have bad results overall, but any one result within them is super hard to predict.

TimD56Member since 2019
1 year ago

Good article. Tigers brought in Shelby Miller with a 2-0 lead in the 9th Sunday. Cringed when I saw he him, has been pretty lousy lately. He made several just awful, fat pitches, especially an 0-2 to Fermin right down the middle that he singled on to get the lead run to the plate. Looked like Miller was going to save it despite the bad location, but Melendez hit a letter high splitter that was again left in the middle of the plate, for a 3 run dinger to win it. One of the worst innings locating I have seen all year, and the Tigers paid for it.