Top 25 Prospects: Seattle Mariners
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Seattle Mariners. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Justus Sheffield | 22.8 | MLB | LHP | 2019 | 50 |
2 | Yusei Kikuchi | 27.7 | MLB | LHP | 2019 | 50 |
3 | Jarred Kelenic | 19.6 | R | CF | 2021 | 50 |
4 | Justin Dunn | 23.5 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 50 |
5 | Evan White | 22.9 | AAA | 1B | 2020 | 50 |
6 | Shed Long | 23.5 | AA | 2B | 2019 | 50 |
7 | Julio Rodriguez | 18.2 | R | RF | 2022 | 45+ |
8 | Logan Gilbert | 21.8 | None | RHP | 2020 | 45+ |
9 | Kyle Lewis | 23.6 | AA | RF | 2020 | 45 |
10 | Noelvi Marte | 17.4 | None | SS | 2023 | 40+ |
11 | Cal Raleigh | 22.3 | A- | C | 2021 | 40+ |
12 | Erik Swanson | 25.5 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40+ |
13 | Sam Carlson | 20.3 | R | RHP | 2022 | 40+ |
14 | Braden Bishop | 25.5 | AA | CF | 2019 | 40 |
15 | Wyatt Mills | 24.1 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
16 | Jake Fraley | 23.8 | A+ | LF | 2020 | 40 |
17 | Dom Thompson-Williams | 23.9 | A+ | LF | 2021 | 40 |
18 | Juan Querecuto | 18.5 | R | SS | 2022 | 40 |
19 | Gerson Bautista | 23.8 | MLB | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
20 | Matthew Festa | 26.0 | MLB | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
21 | Joey Gerber | 21.8 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
22 | Anthony Misiewicz | 24.3 | AA | LHP | 2019 | 40 |
23 | Jorge Benitez | 19.8 | A- | LHP | 2022 | 35+ |
24 | Luis Liberato | 23.2 | AA | CF | 2020 | 35+ |
25 | Ricardo Sanchez | 21.9 | AA | LHP | 2019 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Corner Hitters With Fringy Offensive Profiles
Joe Rizzo, 3B
Dan Vogelbach, DH
Joey Curletta, 1B
Eric Filia, 1B/RF
Keegan McGovern, 1B
Ariel Sandoval, RF
We’ve never been huge on Rizzo despite his obvious feel for contact because his frame has been maxed out since high school and we weren’t sure where sufficient power was going to come from, especially if he were to ever move off of third base. He’s still just 20 and had respectable peripherals at Hi-A last year, so we’ll continue to keep tabs on him despite our skepticism. Vogelbach and Curletta might each see big league time this year. Vogelbach’s approach prioritizes contact over the type of selectivity he’d need to have to get to all his power. His bat control makes this approach viable, but it may not generate offense that clears the bar at 1B/DH. He may be a good buy low target for an NL team trying to get ahead of the universal DH implementation. Like a lot of Dodgers and ex-Dodgers, Curletta’s batted ball profile has shifted and become flyball heavy over the course of several years. He did have 23 dingers last year, though he was a 24-year-old in Double-A and struck out quite a bit. Those two are both younger than Filia, who has raked for his entire college and pro career amid several off-field issues and a trade that fell through due to a medical red flag. He may fall into a late-career Lenny Harris type role if a team has enough defensive flexibility elsewhere on its roster. McGovern was a high-priority senior sign who remade his physique and had a tool uptick. He’s 23 and will need to move quickly. Sandoval has big power and runs well, but the 33% strikeout rate is ominous.
Sleeper Arms
Sam Delaplane, RHP
Deivy Florido, RHP
David McKay, RHP
Brayan Perez, LHP
Delaplane has a 2700 rpm curveball and low-90s sinker, and he hides the ball pretty well and K’d 100 hitters in 60 innings at Low-A last year. Because he’s a cold-weather college arm, it’s a little more acceptable that he performed that way at 23, and we think he’s an interesting sleeper who might get pushed quickly this year. Florido will be 18 all year. He sits 87-89, has modest physical projection, advanced fastball control, and feel for spin. McKay was part of a group of minor league players the Mariners acquired from the Royals for cash early in 2018, presumably for minor league depth reasons. Seattle ‘penned him, and it turns out McKay is actually a decent fastball/slider middle relief prospect. Perez is an 18-year-old pitchability lefty who threw well in the DSL; his stuff is currently a bunch of 45s and 50s and his arm action is good, but the frame limits projection.
Older Relievers
Nick Rumbelow, RHP
Art Warren, RHP
Brandon Brennan, RHP
These are all relief or depth types in the age 25-27 range. Seattle gave up Juan Then to acquire Rumbelow from the Yankees and he barely pitched last year due to a nerve issue in his neck. When healthy, he’s 92-95, and touches 97, with an above-average changeup and slider. Warren pared his repertoire down and is now a fastball/slider middle relief prospect of somewhat advanced age. Brennan was the team’s Rule 5 pickup; his report is available here.
System Overview
This list, of course, looks much different than last year’s iteration, which was arguably the saddest list we’ve ever done, the Charlie Brown Christmas tree of prospect lists. Of course, stocking this system with several of the high-profile names now present cost Seattle 2018’s best reliever, a shortstop with a 70 bat, a Dominican icon, an emerging if perhaps unassuming face of the franchise, and Mike Zunino.
Most of the prospects Seattle acquired in return are relatively close to the majors, supporting the front office’s public assertions that this will be a short-term rebuild. Additionally, the two teenagers in the system most likely to be stars (Rodriguez and Kelenic) are quite advanced for their age, and could be on an accelerated developmental path that enables them to overlap for a while in the big leagues with the other 50 FV prospects in the system, even though they are about four or five years older than Kelenic and Rodriguez on average.
There will be prospect entropy — J.P. Crawford, who doesn’t look so great thus far in the spring, is a great example of this. Not all of these guys will end up as good as we and the Mariners currently project them to be, and this system is still pretty thin beyond the names who were brought on this offseason. The structure of the rebuild indicates intelligent design, but chaos and entropy will play their role. Mitch Haniger (who looks like a star), Domingo Santana (who has the talent to be one), and the charismatic Mallex Smith (who may sneakily already be one) will be fun to watch while the kids grow up.
We still don’t know a lot about this org’s player development. The swollen physiques of the Jack Zduriencik era seem to be a thing of the past as the strength and conditioning program has improved, but this group really hasn’t had much talent to mold, let alone enough to draw results-based conclusions about the player dev approach, and the cement is pretty dry on the 50 FV prospects listed above.
How much better is this system now than at the end of the year? It was last by a good bit in Craig’s end-of-season analysis and, while we consider re-working our math, it has currently moved up into the 14-19 range in all of baseball.
It’s still kind of a sad list, at least at the top. Sheffield and Dunn look like very good relievers, and “fringe hit tool who projects as a platoon left field bat” is not exactly inspiring. I’d be more excited about Rodriguez and Gilbert than any of them, and potentially even the 40+ guys (Swanson, Carlson, Raleigh, etc).
On the plus side, Kelenic and Rodriguez do look like a fun tandem to root for. Athletic, high-makeup, and technically-advanced teenagers but without the sky-is-the-limit profiles are unusual, but you could see both of them debuting early and being good contributors for a while as a result.
Given how awful this system was on Nov 1, its current status is still impressive.
They’d have one FV50 prospect without the trades?
With Dunn showing 4 above average pitches, I’d say his upside is still in the rotation, not as a reliever. Mariners might break him in as a reliever, but the Mets used him as a starter in the minors, and I’m sure he’ll get every opportunity to start in Seattle, until he proves he can’t…
Yeah if Dunn can’t stick as a SP I’d love to see him as a multi inning reliever. I feel like too many prospects are either 6 inning starters or 1ish inning relievers. You don’t really see very many relievers who log 100 IP in a season.
Not really fair to just assume Dunn and Sheffield are already relievers. They also have 6 of the top 132 prospects in the game which is fine as well as 8 guys who are 45+ or higher. They don’t really have any standout prospects like Houston or Oakland, but they do have several guys who are in or near top 100 prospects.
Maybe I’ve just been in the desert thirsting for water for too long, but it’s hard to agree that this is a sad list. I was a bit frustrated about them prioritizing proximity over upside in the Segura and Paxton trades, but then they went out and got Kelenic.
I’m not thrilled with Sheffield-Dunn among the org’s top three traditional prospects either, but as a fan I’m also looking at potentially the most exciting position player duo this system’s had in years. There’s a pretty easy-to-imagine (not the same as likely, obviously) scenario where this top-5 is completely overhauled after 4-6 weeks of the minor league season with a couple of guys with the potential to vault into top-50 consideration with good performances in full-season ball. If you count Kikuchi, the system has an as-close-to-can’t-miss-as-possible middle rotation starter who’s MLB ready, which is hugely valuable, and it’s not like Sheffield and Dunn don’t have quality starter upside.
The sad part is the depth, which is unavoidable given DiPoto’s scorched-earth approach to the farm system until this past offseason. That will probably haunt the team for at least a few more years, and there’s always the chance he returns to trading away youth with reckless abandon as soon as the MLB team shows some promise, which is why following this team will always be frustrating.
I think this is probably the glass-is-half-full version of my comment, and one that is eminently reasonable. Kelenic and Rodriguez are really exciting players, and Dunn and Sheffield look like major-league-quality somethings. Dunn, in particular, has the potential to be dominant closer if his command improvements don’t stick or he has workload problems; he’s further away than Sheffield, but he also has at least as good command, which suggests he has a better chance of sticking in the rotation.
I don’t really think of Kikuchi as a prospect, but he looks like he’s going to be a good starter now, so that’s something too. I’m a little intrigued by the positive news on White and Lewis, although I don’t hold out a lot of hope for them, if either one turns into something they’ll also be fun to watch.
I think 1-12 in this system is strong, with Bishop, Fraley, Gerson, and Vogelbach contributing more than their ranking would suggest. Furthermore, there is financial room to sign free agents after 2019- which means everything doesn’t have to come from the farm. Draft well this year and the next, and sign a few free agent pieces, and the opportunity should be there to compete.
For what its worth, Sheffield and Dunn have looked outstanding so far in spring training. Small sample size, sure, but they’ve at least shown enough to garner long looks in starting roles. For a team like Seattle we really have no reason to use them as anything other than starters at this point. Kyle Lewis has also looked great, I think he’s finally back to feeling fully like himself.
The list really doesn’t make me sad, and I think any Seattle fan who has been through what we have in terms of prospects and farm systems would agree that this is a promising collection worth being excited about.
The nice thing about Dunn is that although he’s not young for his level, he gets a lot of K’s and the walks have finally receded to playable starter-playable levels. He might have figured it out. With Sheffield, the question is whether he will ever be able to throw strikes, and that doesn’t look good.
The saddest thing is just seeing J.P. Crawford mentioned, I understand that he has lost his prospect status, is presently in purgatory as a post-prospect player and threatens to fall into the abyss as a complete bust, but watching the gradual decline of J.P. Crawford from the next Jimmy Rollins, but better, to solid major league SS, to still can handle SS in the majors, to what the _____ happened has been interesting and informative. While he never performed at any level above rookie league he was the Phillies #1 prospect for 4 straight years and was levitated to as high as #6 prospect in baseball, while the real player, Rhys Hoskins, was consistently disparaged and never made a top 100 list. It seems it is next to impossible to get front offices and talent evaluators to change their first impression. I remember when Wade Boggs first came up. He had to put in 6 years in the minors and hit over. 300 for 5 straight years with an OBP never lower than .396, including two full seasons at AAA, to get a call because he had already been pigeon-holed as a non-prospect. Jeff McNeil looks like he might be another who can play while Dom Smith gets unlimited chances.
To be fair, Wade Boggs hit a grand total of four home runs in his first 2000+ PAs in the minors. The idea that anyone is going to be a Top-50 position player of all time is difficult to wrap your brain around, so even with the benefit of hindsight it’s not easy to see how good he could be just looking at his minor league numbers.
While JP was overhyped the idea that he didn’t perform above rookie ball is wrong. As a 20 year old he had more walks than strikeouts in AA and a 121 wRC+. The bat hasn’t developed like expected but it’s not like this was totally predictable. Lot of the selling point on JP was his great defense at a premium position and it wasn’t crazy to suggest he could settle in as a 105 wRC+ obp over slugging type. Also he’s still just 24 and could be good
I mean, I don’t think this is the thrust of your objection, but there is a very real chance that Dom Smith is good and is himself being blocked by Alonso, McNeil, and one day, Cano.
Stay at home mom Kelly Richards from New York after resigning from her full time job managed to average from $6000-$8000 a month from freelancing at home… This is how she done it
…….
▬▬☛USA~JOB-START
No question, Kelly had a fantastic season!
I’m not surprised the moved off her full time role, as she clearly can play multiple positions at an above average rate. But I definitely question her production at the plate. You have to take the small sample size into account as well as how BABIP-fueled her numbers were. Sure she’s got speed and the profile might play well in Safeco – but she’ll need to walk more to really make it work.
Honestly, I see Kelly Richards as a nearly elite-glove in a backup/utility role long term. Right now she’s a 40, but could be a 45 with a higher on-base %.
Not sure why you are getting downvoted. I agree, even after the trades the farm is still easily in the bottom 10. I still have some hope for Kyle Lewis and Julio/sam are obvious breakout candidates but other than that there isn’t much upside here
You’re agreeing with something ST didn’t say.
Not a single evaluator has put the Ms system in the bottom 10, much less “easily” there (which would imply bottom 6 or 7 at least).
To be fair, I do agree with that statement. It’s only 25 prospects deep in FV35s and up, and the 50s for the most part are not all that inspiring–White, Long, Sheffield, and Dunn could all be 45s and it wouldn’t be surprising at all. Who’s worse? Brewers, Red Sox, and Cubs are the only ones of the group profiled so far. The Phillies and Orioles have similar levels (although both have better depth), and the Giants will be worse, and the Rangers and Royals might also be worse. So if we’re being generous and saying the Mariners are better than the Phillies/Orioles/Rangers/Royals (which I don’t believe, not in all cases), then that sticks them at something like #22. It is, at best, a mediocre system.
Other teams I’d put the Ms clearly ahead of:
Marlins (all their quality prospects are extreme boom/bust types, only four prospects 50 or above)
Mets (also only 25 deep here, and 4 of their top 7 prospects haven’t gotten out of rookie ball, top prospect is 1B-only)
Rockies (one stud and then very thin from there)
Indians (similar talent at the top but not as much of it, though deeper at lower levels)
Yankees (a lot of future potential at this point coupled with a great recent reputation for player development, but you’re dreaming on future prospect status with this system far more than with Ms)
Diamondbacks
I think there’s decent arguments to prefer the Ms’ system to the A’s as well. They’re better at the very top but not much deeper and their 4th best prospect would probably rank 9 or 10 in the Ms’ system.
FWIW, BA has Ms ranked 14th. I see KLaw put them at 22 (so I was wrong earlier that no evaluator has ranked them that low), but he doesn’t include Japanese players.