Top 26 Prospects: Detroit Tigers
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Detroit Tigers. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Casey Mize | 21.9 | A+ | RHP | 2019 | 55 |
2 | Matt Manning | 21.2 | AA | RHP | 2021 | 50 |
3 | Daz Cameron | 22.2 | AAA | CF | 2020 | 50 |
4 | Isaac Paredes | 20.1 | AA | 3B | 2021 | 50 |
5 | Franklin Perez | 21.3 | AA | RHP | 2021 | 45+ |
6 | Christin Stewart | 25.3 | MLB | DH | 2019 | 45 |
7 | Willi Castro | 21.9 | AAA | SS | 2020 | 45 |
8 | Wenceel Perez | 19.4 | A | SS | 2023 | 45 |
9 | Beau Burrows | 22.5 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 45 |
10 | Parker Meadows | 19.4 | A- | CF | 2022 | 40+ |
11 | Kyle Funkhouser | 25.0 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
12 | Jake Rogers | 23.9 | AA | C | 2020 | 40 |
13 | Elvin Rodriguez | 21.0 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
14 | Carlos Guzman | 20.9 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
15 | Alex Faedo | 23.4 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
16 | Sergio Alcantara | 22.7 | AA | SS | 2019 | 40 |
17 | Kody Clemens | 22.9 | A+ | 2B | 2021 | 40 |
18 | Spencer Turnbull | 26.6 | MLB | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
19 | Anthony Castro | 24.0 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
20 | Bryan Garcia | 23.9 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
21 | Adinso Reyes | 17.4 | R | 3B | 2024 | 40 |
22 | Derek Hill | 23.2 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 40 |
23 | Reed Garrett | 26.2 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
24 | Dawel Lugo | 24.2 | MLB | 2B | 2019 | 35+ |
25 | Matt Hall | 25.7 | MLB | LHP | 2019 | 35+ |
26 | Gregory Soto | 24.1 | A+ | LHP | 2021 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Bench Outfield Types
Kingston Liniak, CF
Dustin Peterson, LF
Brock Deatherage, CF
Jacob Robson, CF
Danny Woodrow, CF
Troy Montgomery, CF
Most of these guys can run. Liniak is the youngest and has the best chance to grow into some power. Peterson could impact the big league club this year and might hit enough to be a right-handed bench piece for a while. Deatherage was a college draftee who put up huge numbers in rookie ball, but struck out 25% of the time as a 22-year-old and is due for a huge BABIP regression, so we’re skeptical of his hot pro start. Plate discipline (Robson), speed (Woodrow), and sneaky pop (Montgomery) could propel any of the others into a bench outfield role.
Recent July Twos
Alvaro Gonzalez, SS
Jose De La Cruz, RF
Gonzalez signed in 2017 and is a natural shortstop who likely needs to grow into some offensive ability to profile. De La Cruz is a corner outfield projection bat who makes up for limited athleticism with advanced feel to hit.
Starters
Wilkel Hernandez, RHP
Logan Shore, RHP
Tyler Alexander, LHP
Adam Wolf, LHP
Wilkel came over from the Angels in the Ian Kinsler deal. He’s a somewhat projectable 20-year old with a chance for fifth starter stuff. His curveball has good shape but needs more power. Shore is a changeup artist with a 4 fastball. Alexander throws strikes and eats innings and is a good bet to at least be a sixth starter type of depth arm. A similar role likely awaits Wolf, whose best pitch is a cutter.
Relievers
Jason Foley, RHP
Nolan Blackwood, RHP
Eduardo Jimenez, RHP
Zac Houston, RHP
Sandy Baez, RHP
Gerson Moreno, RHP
Wladimir Pinto, RHP
Tarik Skubal, LHP
Foley is coming back from TJ, and would flash upper-90s heat and a good changeup before his injury. He’s still just 23. Blackwood is a sinkerballing submariner. Jimenez, Houston, and Baez are all possible 55 fastball, 55 slider middle relief fits. Moreno, too, but he’s coming off TJ. Pinto throws really hard — in the mid-90s — but that’s about it right now. Skubal was hurt for his junior year at Seattle University and looked good in bullpens before the draft but nobody would meet his ask. He went back to school and was very wild, then dominated in pro ball after signing by throwing about 80% fastballs. He’s a ground-up rebuild who had third round stuff at his best in college.
System Overview
The Tigers have shifted in recent years from a win-now, trade prospects and spend money approach, to an asset collection, hold prospects, and save money approach. The shift from trading many of their top homegrown talents to keeping them could change the fortunes of the farm eventually, but it hasn’t quite done that yet. Casey Mize will likely get to the big leagues soon, so he’s likely be on this list one more time at most. Matt Manning hasn’t had his breakthrough yet, most industry opinions have Daz Cameron as a low-end regular, and there are still plenty of questions about the ultimate upside of Isaac Paredes and the health of Franklin Perez. For the top of the system of a rebuilding club, that isn’t a particularly strong top of the list. The depth is fine, but depth doesn’t really matter when the first priority is creating the core of your future playoff team.
The fifth and 47th picks in this year’s draft will be nice assets to add, but the big league club isn’t overflowing with core talent, either. Michael Fulmer looked like he could be one, but he’s down for the year with elbow surgery. Nick Castellanos is likely to be traded if and when he performs well. There are some solid complementary pieces in Jeimer Candelario, Matt Boyd, Joe Jimenez and Shane Greene, but the focus here needs to be both adding to the talent base and developing the existing talent better. Clubs like the Dodgers, Brewers, and Yankees seem to be creating contributors out of thin air and those are increasingly the table stakes in player development, with many other teams spending resources to join those leaders. The Tigers appear to be more on the traditional end of things in most departments — not wrong, just more traditional — and the rebuild will need player procurement and development to both take a step forward.
Would you guys have taken Mize at #1 last year? I understand that the Tigers org philosophy is essentially to horde every tall, hard-throwing SEC righty on the planet, but it puzzled me since Mize’s prospect timeline appears to be so off of Detroit’s contention timeline.
I see the Nola comps but it’s not hard for me to see Fulmer-type risk in the profile, as well. Both are hard-throwing righties with violent deliveries and not-prototypical athleticism, and both came to the fore about 2 years before they could realistically net real value to the club.
The timeline doesn’t matter to me, but I would not have given anyone in this draft the $7.5M bonus they paid Mize. Seemed like a perfect opportunity to do something like the Phillies did with Moniak and create some real money to use on tougher signs later.
Yeah they should have taken Harper or Correa instead of Mize. Who else was clearly better?
I think they had a little bad luck in that the year they had the #1 pick, Mize was really the only logical choice. With that in mind, it was the right pick. I think everyone, including people in the org., would have preferred if a stud position player showed himself to be worthy prior to draft day.
Unfortunately, guys like Bart, Bohm, Madrigal profile more as solid to above average regulars than future stars & while HS guys like Kelenic & Gorman may profile as a star ceiling, they also had too much downside risk to take 1-1.
Mize was the right choice. If he works out, the rebuild will be further along than thought & they will have a good problem on their hands in deciding whether to keep him or parlay him for younger assets.