Top 27 Prospects: Colorado Rockies
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Colorado Rockies. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brendan Rodgers | 22.8 | MLB | SS | 2019 | 55 |
| 2 | Garrett Hampson | 24.6 | MLB | 2B | 2019 | 50 |
| 3 | Peter Lambert | 22.1 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 50 |
| 4 | Ryan Rolison | 21.9 | A+ | LHP | 2021 | 45 |
| 5 | Colton Welker | 21.6 | AA | 1B | 2021 | 45 |
| 6 | Ryan Vilade | 20.3 | A+ | SS | 2022 | 45 |
| 7 | Tyler Nevin | 22.0 | AA | 1B | 2021 | 45 |
| 8 | Grant Lavigne | 19.8 | A | 1B | 2022 | 40+ |
| 9 | Terrin Vavra | 22.0 | A | 2B | 2021 | 40+ |
| 10 | Ryan Castellani | 23.2 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40+ |
| 11 | Riley Pint | 21.6 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 12 | Julio Carreras | 19.4 | R | SS | 2023 | 40+ |
| 13 | Helcris Olivarez | 18.8 | R | LHP | 2023 | 40 |
| 14 | Vince Fernandez | 23.8 | AA | LF | 2020 | 40 |
| 15 | Breiling Eusebio | 22.6 | A | LHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 16 | Jesus Tinoco | 24.1 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 17 | Yency Almonte | 25.0 | MLB | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 18 | Ronaiker Palma | 19.4 | R | C | 2023 | 40 |
| 19 | Ryan Feltner | 22.7 | A | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 20 | Josh Fuentes | 26.3 | MLB | 3B | 2019 | 40 |
| 21 | Tommy Doyle | 23.1 | A+ | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 22 | Ben Bowden | 24.6 | AA | LHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 23 | Robert Tyler | 23.9 | A+ | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 24 | Fadriel Cruz | 18.5 | R | 2B | 2024 | 35+ |
| 25 | Ezequiel Tovar | 17.8 | R | SS | 2024 | 35+ |
| 26 | Eddy Diaz | 19.3 | R | 2B | 2023 | 35+ |
| 27 | Justin Lawrence | 24.5 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Vanilla Pitchability
Alfredo Garcia, LHP
Will Gaddis, RHP
Mitchell Kilkenny, RHP
All of these guys project to be able to take a turn in a rotation if needed, and some may cement themselves as backend starter types. Garcia is 19 and missing bats at Low-A while sitting 90-93 with an average changeup and curveball. He generates plus-plus extension. Gaddis has 45 stuff and had 60 command projection as an amateur, but the strikes have backed up. Kilkenny had Tommy John last summer and may not toe a pro affiliate’s mound until he’s 23 next year.
Young Developmental Sleepers
Bladdy Restutiyo, INF
Walking Cabrera, RF
Daniel Montano, OF
Yolki Pena, OF
Shael Mendoza, 2B
Cristopher Navarro, SS
Restutiyo is an athletic, projectable infielder who is currently playing several positions. Cabrera is a traditional right field profile with some power, arm strength, and a big, skinny frame that should add lots of good mass. Pena is just a physical projection teenager who also walked a lot last year. Montano has quick hitter’s hands but may not do enough with the bat to profile in a corner. Mendoza has pop but has regressed on defense; Navarro has a good glove but has regressed with the bat.
Bench Types
Dom Nunez, C
Yonathan Daza, OF
Sam Hilliard, OF
Roberto Ramos, 1B
Brian Mundell, 1B
Nunez is crushing Triple-A. He can catch, he walks, and the rest of his tools are 40s. Hilliard has huge power but can’t touch lefties at all. Ramos and Mundell have Quad-A traits.
Relievers
Rico Garcia, RHP
Reid Humphreys, RHP
Raymells Rosa, RHP
Alfredo Martinez, RHP
Shelby Lackey, RHP
Garcia is starting right now, but his 93-96 and average secondaries project in the bullpen. Humphreys sits 92-95 and has an average breaking ball. Rosa is a loose, athletic 21-year-old who sits 93-94 with an average breaker. Martinez touches 96 and has an above-average curveball. Lackey was a late round draft pick who has been up to 98.
System Overview
The list of recent, early-round Rockies pitcher draftees is terrifying. Peter Lambert is working out. Pint is teetering. David Hill, Javier Medina, Mike Nikorak, Robert Tyler, Mitch Kilkenny, and Ben Bowden have all had injury problems, and 2017 fourth rounder Pearson McMahan is listed on milb.com as having been released already. That’s a lot of misses early in the last few drafts. On some level, this is damning. But look at the 40-man roster and you’ll see that an overwhelming majority of the talent on a competitive club was developed from within. Are the Rockies good at this or not? It depends on how you look at it.
They frustrate scouts, though. The Rockies are notoriously difficult to ply information from, even when it seems logical and in their interest to disseminate that info — like accurate rosters for the backfields, pitching probables, etc. — in the minds of opposing scouts. Is it in a team’s best interest for other teams to like their prospects? Scouts would say yes, but the Rockies don’t always behave as though they think that’s true.
Can we identify talent acquisition trends? The pitchability college arm has been a popular early Day 2 option for Colorado, though it hasn’t really yielded much lately. Up-the-middle performers have panned out well (Hampson, Rodgers, Vilade, and Vavra look good). Last year’s DSL group, which is currently in extended spring training, is deep and interesting. One or two players from that group could emerge as a 45 FV or better this year, though the lack of an AZL affiliate means this group will either need to face Pioneer League pitching or head back to the DSL for the summer, even though they’re age-appropriate for Arizona.
Thank you McDongenhagen, very cool!
If this whole article was about generational superstar, Wander Javier, then we could say you were “saving the best for last”. Instead you chose to save last for 27 Colorado prospects who would be lucky to live in Wander Javier’s shadow. A rocky finish to some questionable decisions.
I am honestly going to miss this. Until next year!
I love these– the best breakdown of prospects team by team out there– thank you.
One request however, this is the second straight year that these aren’t finishing up until well into the season. The value of these is much, much greater in February and March, or earlier. By now we’ve already read all about these prospects and we’re gearing up for a new batch to be added next week. Please consider moving up the schedule for these going into next season. Thanks!
Maybe you should ask to speak to their manager.
free, fast, high quality. pick 2.
While I understand the question, this is a ton of free, high quality info. probably the best.
It is indeed odd. Since when FG only had one person writing these, they were routinely done by Opening Day. Last year’s delay made more sense, given that they were adjusting midstream to a collaborative effort and wanted to get things right.
But this is year two. And seeing them take 7 months to release sure seems to indicate this is intentional. I know they’ve been asked repeatedly about the intended schedule in chats (I’m in leagues with at least a dozen different people who have raised the question) and they ignore all such questions. If it’s intentionally slow, why? And if it’s unintentional (and you recognize that readers may be disappointed) why not own it and indicate what you plan to do better next year?
Is it odd? It’s not like the only thing they’re doing is writing prospect lists – they’re going out and scouting, they’re plugged in and talking to industry sources, they’re building THE BOARD, doing amateur draft and J2 coverage. It’s a labor of love and when you consider the insane depth of these and that they have other obligations besides *just* prospect lists it isn’t that odd that they finish when they do. Guess they could just be like Baseball America and only do Top 10 lists…
And what difference does finishing in March or May make? Because they’re not ready in time for your fantasy baseball draft? That’s not a good enough argument to criticize their timing when the quality and quantity of their free content is what it is
Baseball America does a whole book with each team having a top 30 on the shelves before Opening Day. Though BA has a much bigger staff too. I have said many times that it should not really be acceptable to take this long with the prospect lists though.
And you have to pay BA to see the full 30
Not sure what your point is. Whether pay or subscription sites, the norm is for these to be out before the season starts. That used to be the case at Fangraphs when it was just 1 person churning these out. That’s just being professional.
There might be good reasons for the lack of a timetable at Fangraphs. What is problematic, though, is the refusal to address it, as if it’s not an issue. I asked in a separate post if their comments on guys 40% into the 2019 include an analysis of what they’ve done so far in 2019? That’s relevant Rodgers and Lavigne and a lot of these guys. And….crickets. It’s as if they’re embarrassed about this and so have decided they’ll just ignore that it’s an issue in the hopes people will stop pointing out the obvious questions.
But it’s nice they have true believer fans out there to direct people to not even raise the issue. Here’s a better idea: simply explain it.
So when your league drafts prospects, your market inefficiency is whichever teams they haven’t released reports on yet.
If enough people who are upset with the timeline pony up the fifty bucks, then maybe they hire a third person and farm grunt work out to them, and you get earlier team prospect reports.
I didn’t understand the complaints last year, and I don’t understand them this year. We’re really lucky prospect content of this caliber – the kind that isn’t just not-so-loosely plagiarizing other publications – isn’t locked behind a paywall.
They could at least become paying members of the site before they start airing grievances..
Ahh yes, let’s criticize people for not donating money to something they can get for free. They simply shouldn’t have an opinion if they don’t pay, right?
Having watched Brendan Rodgers make his debut over the last few weeks, I can tell the kid is going to be a star. He’s already drastically improved his pitch selection from game 1 to yesterday, and he just oozes poise at the plate. I know there will be ups and downs that will come with the league adjusting to him, but the way he carries himself gives me the feeling he’s going to rake for years
In re not getting these done during the spring, I suppose you have reasons for that even if it is…odd. But what’s weirder is the lack of transparency in re whether or not you consider “early” (after 2 months it’s actually getting close to 40% of the minor league season) performance in these. For example, in re Lavigne, you write:
“We’re cautiously optimistic that he can do it, but he’s out of the gate a little slower than we anticipated.”
Is that a reference to his struggles in 2019? It’d seem so, since in limited ABs at the end of 2018 he was quite strong. But…well…whose to know? Mostly it seems these are written as if they are only referencing play through 2018. Why not just say rather than ignore — it seems you want to pretend this isn’t a confusing issue?
Nice write up. I look forward to the Rockies blocking these guys with Ian Desmond.
Mark Reynolds: Rockie Emeritus through 2025
Daza is on the Rockies’ bench now.
I was so excited to see a writeup on Josh Fuentes, and then…the writeup was a sad. Very sad. I still think he can be a regular, but I suppose it would require him to stick at third base (which I suspect he could, but Eric and Kiley know way more than me on this).
One thing blew my mind: They don’t have AZL team? Why not? This seems like a pretty important thing for a team to have to develop talent.
It me, the Yolki Peña and Eddy Diaz stan
“Is it in a team’s best interest for other teams to like their prospects? Scouts would say yes, but the Rockies don’t always behave as though they think that’s true.”
According to this Fansided blog post from April (link at bottom), 18 of Colorado’s 40-man roster came from IFA or the draft. They’re not an especially active trading team. Actually, I can only remember moves of significance where veterans were shipped away (Dickerson, Tulo). It seems bizarre that they wouldn’t want to foster better relationships around the league and have good reports on their players, but at the same time, they are heavily reliant on development. Even when they do add through other avenues, they spend $125m on middle relief and Platoon OF dressed up as Former All-Star. I honestly can’t remember the last significant prospects for significant contributor move they made.
https://calltothepen.com/2019/04/25/colorado-rockies-raimel-tapia-another-product-of-underrated-development/