Top 33 Prospects: Houston Astros
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Houston Astros. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. As there was no minor league season in 2020, there are some instances where no new information was gleaned about a player. Players whose write-ups have not been meaningfully altered begin by telling you so. Each blurb ends with an indication of where the player played in 2020, which in turn likely informed the changes to their report if there were any. As always, I’ve leaned more heavily on sources from outside of a given org than those within for reasons of objectivity. Because outside scouts were not allowed at the alternate sites, I’ve primarily focused on data from there, and the context of that data, in my opinion, reduces how meaningful it is. Lastly, in an effort to more clearly indicate relievers’ anticipated roles, you’ll see two reliever designations, both on my lists and on The Board: MIRP, or multi-inning relief pitcher, and SIRP, or single-inning relief pitcher.
For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of Future Value’s merits and drawbacks, read Future Value.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jeremy Peña | 23.6 | A+ | SS | 2022 | 50 |
2 | Hunter Brown | 22.6 | A- | SP | 2023 | 50 |
3 | Jairo Solis | 21.3 | A | SP | 2022 | 45+ |
4 | Korey Lee | 22.7 | A- | C | 2023 | 45 |
5 | Luis Garcia | 24.3 | MLB | SP | 2021 | 45 |
6 | Bryan Abreu | 24.0 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 45 |
7 | Pedro Leon | 22.9 | R | SS/CF | 2025 | 45 |
8 | Colin Barber | 20.4 | R | CF | 2024 | 45 |
9 | Peter Solomon | 24.7 | A+ | SP | 2021 | 40+ |
10 | Tyler Ivey | 24.9 | AA | MIRP | 2021 | 40+ |
11 | Forrest Whitley | 23.6 | AAA | MIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
12 | Freudis Nova | 21.3 | A | 2B | 2022 | 40+ |
13 | Shawn Dubin | 25.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
14 | Jordan Brewer | 23.7 | A- | CF | 2023 | 40 |
15 | Alex Santos II | 19.2 | R | SP | 2025 | 40 |
16 | Grae Kessinger | 23.6 | A | SS | 2022 | 40 |
17 | Nivaldo Rodriguez | 24.0 | MLB | SP | 2021 | 40 |
18 | Chas McCormick | 26.0 | MLB | RF | 2021 | 40 |
19 | Dauri Lorenzo | 18.5 | R | SS | 2025 | 40 |
20 | Misael Tamarez | 21.2 | R | SP | 2024 | 40 |
21 | Zach Daniels | 22.2 | R | CF | 2024 | 40 |
22 | Austin Hansen | 24.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
23 | Jojanse Torres | 25.7 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 40 |
24 | Luis Santana | 21.7 | AA | 2B | 2022 | 40 |
25 | Jose Alberto Rivera | 24.2 | A | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
26 | Tyler Brown | 22.5 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
27 | Jairo Lopez | 20.4 | A- | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
28 | Angel Macuare | 21.1 | A- | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
29 | Manny Ramirez | 21.4 | A | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
30 | Brett Conine | 24.5 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
31 | Juan Pablo Lopez | 22.2 | A | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
32 | Julio Robaina | 20.1 | A | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
33 | Diosmerky Taveras | 21.6 | R | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Younger, Higher Variance Types
Enmanuel Valdez, 2B
Roilan Machandy, CF
Nathan Perry, C
Deury Carrasco, SS
Yohander Martinez, 3B
Alfredi Jimenez, RHP
Luis Vega, RHP
Valdez, 22, is a stocky, slower twitch infielder with limited range. He has good hands and actions and some feel to hit. He performed with the bat until a mid-year 2019 promotion to High-A. He could be a bat-first infield role player. Machandy, 19, is a speedy DSL center fielder from Cuba who needs a long-term look because of his tools. Perry is a 20-year-old, well-built catcher with an athletic lefty swing, and his defense is improving. His exit velos are in the 40/45-grade area right now, but he’s still pretty young and puts on a better show than that during BP. Carrasco barely played in 2019 and was bad when he did, but he only turned 20 in September. I liked him as a speed/glove/versatility bench piece last year. Yohander Martinez was a 2019 DSL All-Star. He’s well-built and has a plus arm; his swing has some length but it also has lift. Jimenez is a 21-year-old lower slot guy up to 95. Vega is an 19-year-old pitchability righty with a bunch of average pitches.
Older, Potential Role Players
Ronnie Dawson, CF
Jose Siri, CF
Bryan De La Cruz, OF
Matthew Barefoot, OF
Ralph Garza Jr., RHP
Leovanny Rodriguez, RHP
Alex McKenna, OF
Shay Whitcomb, 2B
Tommy DeJuneas, RHP
Ross Adolph, OF
Ronel Blanco, RHP
Dawson has some pop and has worked hard to give himself a shot to stay in center, but the contact piece there is light. He might be a star overseas. Siri was once a 50 FV thanks to his plus speed and power, but he’s an on-field stallion who’s never been tamed. De La Cruz is in that tough spot between the Guillermo Heredia bench outfield types (who can play center) and the Adam Duvall types (who have actual power). Barefoot is a swing change candidate with present speed and defense. He hit really well with wood on Cape Cod but flopped in a short Penn-League run in 2019. Leovanny Rodriguez, 23, is a three-quarters slot righty who sits 91-95 in relief. He has good numbers up through High-A. McKenna, Adolph, and Barefoot are all tier two or three college center fielders who performed as amateurs. They have tweener traits and had down statistical seasons in 2019. There was some 35+ FV support for Adolph because he has more pop than most others here. Whitcomb doesn’t have big visual tools but raked at a smaller SoCal school, UC San Diego. De Juneas is up to 97, Blanco up to 96. They’re both well into their mid-20s and have control problems.
Mashers
Taylor Jones, 1B
Joe Perez, 3B
J.J. Matijevic, 1B
Rainier Rivas, 1B
Scott Manea, C
This is pretty self-explanatory. Jones is on the 40-man and you’ve probably seen him play. He averaged 91 mph off the bat in 2019, and hit 48% of his balls in play at 95 mph or above. He might be a corner bench piece because of the power. Perez has big raw power and also has huge arm strength, so I wonder if he might be moved to the mound if he doesn’t hit again in 2021. Rivas was acquired from the Angels for Max Stassi. He is only 19 but still averaged exit velos above 92 mph in 2019. He’s wholly unprojectable and positionless, but there’s real power. Matijevic whiffs too much to be a 40 FV first base fit. Meanea has a fire hydrant and plus power.
Unique Looks
Willy Collado, RHP
Kent Emanuel, LHP
Kit Scheetz, LHP
Brayan De Paula, LHP
Dean Deetz, RHP
Collado was close to being on the list even though he only touches 92 on occasion. He’s a side-arm sinker/slider relief prospect with bat-missing tail on an upper-80s fastball. He’s 22 and has reached Double-A. Emanuel generates big sink on his fastball. Scheetz was undrafted out of Virginia Tech but has missed bats all the way up the minor league ladder. He’s a funky, junk-balling lefty who is great bullpen injury insurance for 2020. De Paula is pretty projectable, and has real arm strength (up to 95) but poor control. We’ve written about Deetz the last few seasons, but his control regressed last year.
System Overview
You probably already know that this org has been fantastic at identifying and developing pitching, and that remains true enough that the club may still contend even without Justin Verlander and, for a while, Framber Valdez giving teams the raspberry at the top of their rotation. The rest of baseball has realized the value of acquiring the pitching characteristics Houston was hip to before most others, so the flow of backspinning fastballs will probably slow down, but bear in mind that there’s also a new regime in place that may have other ideas, especially since Tampa Bay (from whence James Click came) likes their two-seamer/slider guys.
The Pedro Leon signing marks another of several high-profile Houston acquisitions from Cuba (Cionel Pérez, Yuli Gurriel, and (sort of) Yordan Alvarez and Aledmys Díaz) while other teams place more focus on 16-year-old Dominican kids. The Astros have also typically targeted older pitchers internationally. Again, the Click era is still pretty new and these things are subject to change, though because of how the international market works, we may not see alterations here for a couple of years.
Overall, this system feels like it has below-average impact at the top but also has a couple of lower-ranked guys with breakout potential who might eventually provide Top 100 value or impact.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
I wish FV was more tied to future fWAR. Craig Edward’s had a couple of follow-up pieces that developed FV to WAR conversions for a player’s club control years. I’d guess at least one of Garcia, Abreu, and Ivey exceeds the club control fWAR this season that their FV suggests. FV seems to undervalue upper level guys (well guys that would normally be upper level) that will be/are MLB players, but not great ones.
To me the FV’s make sense. Because these are all guys with modest upsides and also bust risks, they aren’t the safe high probability starter types like Deitmers for instance. Ivey I like as a multi inning reliever type, he’ll likely struggle with lefties too much to start. Javier relies too much on FB I still think he’s either a backend starter or a reliever in the end, he also has troubling bust traits.
Abreu may have the best stuff of the 3, but it’s 100% pure pen stuff/delivery/command. I can see him developing into a high leverage guy but there is also up and down reliever risk if command doesn’t come along. Also keep in mind all these guys are 24-25 they aren’t reaching the majors at uniquely young ages.
I get there is risk, but a FV45 pitcher is worth 0.4 WAR (NPV) over the 1st 6 years of a player’s career on average from Edwards’s work. ZiPS has Abreu at 1.2 WAR and Garcia at 2.2 WAR for 2021-2023. Is the FV rating saying there is something Eric sees in these guys that makes them significantly more risky than the numbers that ZiPS is using? My guess is that FV is based more on upside such that a lower level FV45 may end being a lot better, but odds are that the upper level 45 pitcher will provide more MLB value on average and on median (i.e., FV is not a 1:1 to future WAR). Granted, 1-2 WAR over 3 years isn’t much, but it adds up over time if a team has enough guys like that.
Fangraphs FV is literally tied to an estimation of future fWAR in the years before free agency.
What you’re identifying is not a failure to attempt to evaluate the future value in the terms you want, but the level of inaccuracy present in evaluation. Also, other publications don’t use this standard. Further, this publication hasn’t used the standard long enough to entirely evaluate their accuracy using that scale.
But that is literally how they do it now.
Literally from the linked Scouting Primer:
What is FV?
FV stands for Future Value, and it’s the way we distill each player’s scouting evaluation into a single expression. Broadly stated, Future Value is a grade on the 20-80 scale that maps to anticipated annual WAR production during the player’s first six years of service. But there’s also quite a bit of nuance underlying that definition, so let’s break down its components.
But that piece is from 2018: it’s too early to say if they’re consistently hitting high or low in their estimations overall.