Top 33 Prospects: Houston Astros
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Houston Astros. Scouting reports were compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. As there was no minor league season in 2020, there are some instances where no new information was gleaned about a player. Players whose write-ups have not been meaningfully altered begin by telling you so. Each blurb ends with an indication of where the player played in 2020, which in turn likely informed the changes to their report if there were any. As always, I’ve leaned more heavily on sources from outside of a given org than those within for reasons of objectivity. Because outside scouts were not allowed at the alternate sites, I’ve primarily focused on data from there, and the context of that data, in my opinion, reduces how meaningful it is. Lastly, in an effort to more clearly indicate relievers’ anticipated roles, you’ll see two reliever designations, both on my lists and on The Board: MIRP, or multi-inning relief pitcher, and SIRP, or single-inning relief pitcher.
For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of Future Value’s merits and drawbacks, read Future Value.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeremy Peña | 23.6 | A+ | SS | 2022 | 50 |
| 2 | Hunter Brown | 22.6 | A- | SP | 2023 | 50 |
| 3 | Jairo Solis | 21.3 | A | SP | 2022 | 45+ |
| 4 | Korey Lee | 22.7 | A- | C | 2023 | 45 |
| 5 | Luis Garcia | 24.3 | MLB | SP | 2021 | 45 |
| 6 | Bryan Abreu | 24.0 | MLB | SIRP | 2021 | 45 |
| 7 | Pedro Leon | 22.9 | R | SS/CF | 2025 | 45 |
| 8 | Colin Barber | 20.4 | R | CF | 2024 | 45 |
| 9 | Peter Solomon | 24.7 | A+ | SP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 10 | Tyler Ivey | 24.9 | AA | MIRP | 2021 | 40+ |
| 11 | Forrest Whitley | 23.6 | AAA | MIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 12 | Freudis Nova | 21.3 | A | 2B | 2022 | 40+ |
| 13 | Shawn Dubin | 25.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 14 | Jordan Brewer | 23.7 | A- | CF | 2023 | 40 |
| 15 | Alex Santos II | 19.2 | R | SP | 2025 | 40 |
| 16 | Grae Kessinger | 23.6 | A | SS | 2022 | 40 |
| 17 | Nivaldo Rodriguez | 24.0 | MLB | SP | 2021 | 40 |
| 18 | Chas McCormick | 26.0 | MLB | RF | 2021 | 40 |
| 19 | Dauri Lorenzo | 18.5 | R | SS | 2025 | 40 |
| 20 | Misael Tamarez | 21.2 | R | SP | 2024 | 40 |
| 21 | Zach Daniels | 22.2 | R | CF | 2024 | 40 |
| 22 | Austin Hansen | 24.6 | A+ | SIRP | 2021 | 40 |
| 23 | Jojanse Torres | 25.7 | A+ | SIRP | 2022 | 40 |
| 24 | Luis Santana | 21.7 | AA | 2B | 2022 | 40 |
| 25 | Jose Alberto Rivera | 24.2 | A | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 26 | Tyler Brown | 22.5 | R | SIRP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 27 | Jairo Lopez | 20.4 | A- | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 28 | Angel Macuare | 21.1 | A- | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 29 | Manny Ramirez | 21.4 | A | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 30 | Brett Conine | 24.5 | AA | SIRP | 2021 | 35+ |
| 31 | Juan Pablo Lopez | 22.2 | A | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 32 | Julio Robaina | 20.1 | A | SP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 33 | Diosmerky Taveras | 21.6 | R | SIRP | 2023 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Younger, Higher Variance Types
Enmanuel Valdez, 2B
Roilan Machandy, CF
Nathan Perry, C
Deury Carrasco, SS
Yohander Martinez, 3B
Alfredi Jimenez, RHP
Luis Vega, RHP
Valdez, 22, is a stocky, slower twitch infielder with limited range. He has good hands and actions and some feel to hit. He performed with the bat until a mid-year 2019 promotion to High-A. He could be a bat-first infield role player. Machandy, 19, is a speedy DSL center fielder from Cuba who needs a long-term look because of his tools. Perry is a 20-year-old, well-built catcher with an athletic lefty swing, and his defense is improving. His exit velos are in the 40/45-grade area right now, but he’s still pretty young and puts on a better show than that during BP. Carrasco barely played in 2019 and was bad when he did, but he only turned 20 in September. I liked him as a speed/glove/versatility bench piece last year. Yohander Martinez was a 2019 DSL All-Star. He’s well-built and has a plus arm; his swing has some length but it also has lift. Jimenez is a 21-year-old lower slot guy up to 95. Vega is an 19-year-old pitchability righty with a bunch of average pitches.
Older, Potential Role Players
Ronnie Dawson, CF
Jose Siri, CF
Bryan De La Cruz, OF
Matthew Barefoot, OF
Ralph Garza Jr., RHP
Leovanny Rodriguez, RHP
Alex McKenna, OF
Shay Whitcomb, 2B
Tommy DeJuneas, RHP
Ross Adolph, OF
Ronel Blanco, RHP
Dawson has some pop and has worked hard to give himself a shot to stay in center, but the contact piece there is light. He might be a star overseas. Siri was once a 50 FV thanks to his plus speed and power, but he’s an on-field stallion who’s never been tamed. De La Cruz is in that tough spot between the Guillermo Heredia bench outfield types (who can play center) and the Adam Duvall types (who have actual power). Barefoot is a swing change candidate with present speed and defense. He hit really well with wood on Cape Cod but flopped in a short Penn-League run in 2019. Leovanny Rodriguez, 23, is a three-quarters slot righty who sits 91-95 in relief. He has good numbers up through High-A. McKenna, Adolph, and Barefoot are all tier two or three college center fielders who performed as amateurs. They have tweener traits and had down statistical seasons in 2019. There was some 35+ FV support for Adolph because he has more pop than most others here. Whitcomb doesn’t have big visual tools but raked at a smaller SoCal school, UC San Diego. De Juneas is up to 97, Blanco up to 96. They’re both well into their mid-20s and have control problems.
Mashers
Taylor Jones, 1B
Joe Perez, 3B
J.J. Matijevic, 1B
Rainier Rivas, 1B
Scott Manea, C
This is pretty self-explanatory. Jones is on the 40-man and you’ve probably seen him play. He averaged 91 mph off the bat in 2019, and hit 48% of his balls in play at 95 mph or above. He might be a corner bench piece because of the power. Perez has big raw power and also has huge arm strength, so I wonder if he might be moved to the mound if he doesn’t hit again in 2021. Rivas was acquired from the Angels for Max Stassi. He is only 19 but still averaged exit velos above 92 mph in 2019. He’s wholly unprojectable and positionless, but there’s real power. Matijevic whiffs too much to be a 40 FV first base fit. Meanea has a fire hydrant and plus power.
Unique Looks
Willy Collado, RHP
Kent Emanuel, LHP
Kit Scheetz, LHP
Brayan De Paula, LHP
Dean Deetz, RHP
Collado was close to being on the list even though he only touches 92 on occasion. He’s a side-arm sinker/slider relief prospect with bat-missing tail on an upper-80s fastball. He’s 22 and has reached Double-A. Emanuel generates big sink on his fastball. Scheetz was undrafted out of Virginia Tech but has missed bats all the way up the minor league ladder. He’s a funky, junk-balling lefty who is great bullpen injury insurance for 2020. De Paula is pretty projectable, and has real arm strength (up to 95) but poor control. We’ve written about Deetz the last few seasons, but his control regressed last year.
System Overview
You probably already know that this org has been fantastic at identifying and developing pitching, and that remains true enough that the club may still contend even without Justin Verlander and, for a while, Framber Valdez giving teams the raspberry at the top of their rotation. The rest of baseball has realized the value of acquiring the pitching characteristics Houston was hip to before most others, so the flow of backspinning fastballs will probably slow down, but bear in mind that there’s also a new regime in place that may have other ideas, especially since Tampa Bay (from whence James Click came) likes their two-seamer/slider guys.
The Pedro Leon signing marks another of several high-profile Houston acquisitions from Cuba (Cionel Pérez, Yuli Gurriel, and (sort of) Yordan Alvarez and Aledmys Díaz) while other teams place more focus on 16-year-old Dominican kids. The Astros have also typically targeted older pitchers internationally. Again, the Click era is still pretty new and these things are subject to change, though because of how the international market works, we may not see alterations here for a couple of years.
Overall, this system feels like it has below-average impact at the top but also has a couple of lower-ranked guys with breakout potential who might eventually provide Top 100 value or impact.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
I wish FV was more tied to future fWAR. Craig Edward’s had a couple of follow-up pieces that developed FV to WAR conversions for a player’s club control years. I’d guess at least one of Garcia, Abreu, and Ivey exceeds the club control fWAR this season that their FV suggests. FV seems to undervalue upper level guys (well guys that would normally be upper level) that will be/are MLB players, but not great ones.
To me the FV’s make sense. Because these are all guys with modest upsides and also bust risks, they aren’t the safe high probability starter types like Deitmers for instance. Ivey I like as a multi inning reliever type, he’ll likely struggle with lefties too much to start. Javier relies too much on FB I still think he’s either a backend starter or a reliever in the end, he also has troubling bust traits.
Abreu may have the best stuff of the 3, but it’s 100% pure pen stuff/delivery/command. I can see him developing into a high leverage guy but there is also up and down reliever risk if command doesn’t come along. Also keep in mind all these guys are 24-25 they aren’t reaching the majors at uniquely young ages.
I get there is risk, but a FV45 pitcher is worth 0.4 WAR (NPV) over the 1st 6 years of a player’s career on average from Edwards’s work. ZiPS has Abreu at 1.2 WAR and Garcia at 2.2 WAR for 2021-2023. Is the FV rating saying there is something Eric sees in these guys that makes them significantly more risky than the numbers that ZiPS is using? My guess is that FV is based more on upside such that a lower level FV45 may end being a lot better, but odds are that the upper level 45 pitcher will provide more MLB value on average and on median (i.e., FV is not a 1:1 to future WAR). Granted, 1-2 WAR over 3 years isn’t much, but it adds up over time if a team has enough guys like that.
Fangraphs FV is literally tied to an estimation of future fWAR in the years before free agency.
What you’re identifying is not a failure to attempt to evaluate the future value in the terms you want, but the level of inaccuracy present in evaluation. Also, other publications don’t use this standard. Further, this publication hasn’t used the standard long enough to entirely evaluate their accuracy using that scale.
But that is literally how they do it now.
Literally from the linked Scouting Primer:
What is FV?
FV stands for Future Value, and it’s the way we distill each player’s scouting evaluation into a single expression. Broadly stated, Future Value is a grade on the 20-80 scale that maps to anticipated annual WAR production during the player’s first six years of service. But there’s also quite a bit of nuance underlying that definition, so let’s break down its components.
But that piece is from 2018: it’s too early to say if they’re consistently hitting high or low in their estimations overall.
I’m extremely iffy with Jones, I watched him and it does not feel like he’ll be a suitable future starter considering he’s already 27 and hasn’t done much to impress
So one of the things that really analytically advanced teams (and Eric) seem to like in a prospect is the high-velocity / crazy-breaking ball combo, to the point where they aren’t that concerned about hitting the strike zone. If I had to guess, it’s because they think if they can stockpile guys like that enough of them will manage well enough to pitch in the big leagues. But of course, at the individual level, most of them don’t pan out.
All of this is a long way of saying that I don’t think Bryan Abreu is gonna make it. It’s clear the Astros really really want to make this work, because they and some other teams (like the Yankees) spend a lot of time stockpiling guys like him and putting them on the 40-man early, but for any single guy like that it doesn’t look good.
This is a good point and also why I somewhat question the notion that Houston is good at developing pitching prospects. They’ve worked their magic with guys that have already made it (Cole, Verlander), but beyond McCullers (who struggles to go past 5-6 innings) and some small sample guys from last year (Framber, Javier, Urquidy), I mostly see pitching prospects that don’t seem to have the command or control to be SP, but do have the stuff (high fb/good breaker) to be a solid reliever. The Josh James/Frances Martes/Bryan Abreu/Andre Scrubb types are adding up, and it makes me question whether their philosophy or its implementation is working on all prospects, or if its better reserved for MLB-level guys or guys that already have the command to be a starter (Urquidy fits that mold for me as not a traditional Houston pitcher). To me, Javier and Framber are the going to be the ones that affect my overall perception of “is Houston good at developing starters.”
As an Astros fan I agree with you here. We’ve yet to see the fruits of this perception all the way through a prospect’s life cycle. I have a good feeling on a few guys (especially Valdez) but until a few perform in the major leagues it’s still theoretical to me.
To be fair, pitcher attrition is pretty normal. The Braves had something like 10 top pitching prospects and about three of them turned out well (although those three were awfully good). And that was a success story. Take a look at this list from 2018:
https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2018-prospect-list/summary?sort=-1,1&type=0&pos=pit
Whitley, Reyes, Alvarez, Albert Abreu, Touissaint, Espinosa, Baez, and Honeywell have had their careers wrecked my injuries and/or inconsisency. McKay, Puk, Hunter Greene and Kopech all blew out their arms; Sixto Sanchez is a success story for this list but he still feels like he could fall apart at any time. Kyle Wright can’t get back on the big league roster; Luiz Gohara I think is out of baseball. Justus Sheffield is probably a reliever. Overall, I count 62 guys on this list who are FV50 and above, and the number of them who have either definitively established themselves as major league starters or who are still at an FV50 or above today is…about 20? And those are the highest-rated pitchers, many of whom were pretty close to the majors.
Musgrove, Houser, Velasquez, Thornton, Folty, and Hader were also developed by Houston and I believe still all under club control by someone. May not have developed the ace, but definitely an above average number of pitchers and starters have come through the Astros system.
We should really come up with a better way of talking about who developed what players, because while Folty was bouncing between AAA and the majors his first couple years in ATL and Musgrove was clearly a major leaguer (so, yeah, that was likely Houston), Houser didn’t establish himself as a major leaguer for another 4 or 5 years after he was traded and Hader was partway through his time in AA and didn’t debut for approximately two years.
It’s never terribly easy to compare players when they’ve spent reasonable amounts of time in two or more organizations, though. A lot of players do!
On development in the minors, getting a guy to AA pitching well to me counts as developing a player in the minors. If you want to exclude Houser, Hader, and Folty due to major league development, need to just talk overall pitcher development and bring Cole, Morton, Verlander, Keuchel, and McHugh back into the equation.
Realize Jaiver isn’t a prospect anymore, and even though he got sent down (because he wasn’t needed for a while) he has looked great thus far. With the velocity up I think he is a legit 3, possibly a 2 with upside. Watching him pitch his last outing he looked borderline unhittable especially now up around 96.
Javier doesn’t get enough “rise” on the fastball and it’s averaging 93.5 MPH this year per statcast, the slider is good but curveball is merely ok. I think he’s more of a 4 than a 2/3 type, and will particularly have issues with homers on his FB.
My understanding is that Javier’s delivery makes his fastball unusually hard to track for hitters “the invisiball” – so perhaps it will continue to play, even if it’s not elite.
On Javier and rise, he’s 26th among MLB starters despite only throwing 93.5MPH using FanGraphs’ numbers. He’s in the 93rd Percentile of rise per Baseball Savant when factoring in velocity. Also, he has very little horizontal movement giving it an odd shape.
That said, I like Tyler Ivey a lot and think he’s probably in a different class than those other guys (although getting busted for using the sticky stuff makes me wonder how much of his previous successes were real).
Someone should track fantasy ownership of Hunter Brown now that Eric has 50 FV’d him to see if the Fangraphs Effect is real. It’s a bold call but not an unexpected one given some of Eric’s prior comments. He’s definitely one to watch.
I tried to trade for him in a deep dynasty after Eric 50’d him in hopes that I saw it before the person who rostered him
This system isn’t too bad. Yet. Still trending downward as they attempt to keep the current window propped open, and they won’t be able to get any solid reinforcements from the draft for a little while longer.
On another note: any idea when the Padres list goes up Eric/Kevin? . Appreciate the work
There was a stretch where Vandy was thinking of starting Tyler Brown. His stuff was sooooo nasty during that 2019 national title season. Will be hoping he maximizes his potential within the Astros organization.
Ivey really caught my eye during spring, I think his unique delivery will play. I also liked what I saw from Emanuel and Scheetz.
The position players that are higher in the org don’t fill me with confidence, but then again, how long did it take Kyle Tucker to play to his potential?
Supposedly, Dusty really likes De La Cruz, which I don’t really get.
Most teams were on Joe Perez as a Pitcher when the Astros took him in the 2nd round. They announced him as 3b, then he blew out almost immediately and had TJ. All things considered, will be interesting if/when they consider transitioning (not converting) him back to the mound.
Perez had crazy spin rate numbers
Pedro Leon feels a little low to me, hard to ignore those video game numbers while in Cuba.