Top 35 Prospects: Los Angeles Dodgers
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as from our own (both Eric Longenhagen’s and Kiley McDaniel’s) observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a new feature at the site that offers sortable scouting information for every organization. That can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keibert Ruiz | 20.8 | AA | C | 2020 | 60 |
| 2 | Dustin May | 21.7 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 55 |
| 3 | Gavin Lux | 21.4 | AA | 2B | 2021 | 55 |
| 4 | Will Smith | 24.1 | AAA | C | 2019 | 50 |
| 5 | Alex Verdugo | 23.0 | MLB | RF | 2019 | 50 |
| 6 | Tony Gonsolin | 25.0 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 45+ |
| 7 | Jeter Downs | 20.8 | A+ | 2B | 2021 | 45+ |
| 8 | Josiah Gray | 21.4 | A | RHP | 2021 | 45 |
| 9 | Omar Estevez | 21.2 | AA | 2B | 2020 | 45 |
| 10 | DJ Peters | 23.4 | AA | CF | 2020 | 45 |
| 11 | Diego Cartaya | 17.6 | R | C | 2023 | 40+ |
| 12 | Dennis Santana | 23.0 | MLB | RHP | 2019 | 40+ |
| 13 | Connor Wong | 22.9 | A+ | C | 2020 | 40+ |
| 14 | Jacob Amaya | 20.7 | A | SS | 2022 | 40+ |
| 15 | Jeren Kendall | 23.2 | A+ | CF | 2021 | 40+ |
| 16 | Mitchell White | 24.3 | AA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 17 | Cristian Santana | 22.2 | A | 3B | 2021 | 40 |
| 18 | Michael Grove | 22.4 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 19 | Edwin Rios | 25.0 | AAA | 1B | 2019 | 40 |
| 20 | Matt Beaty | 26.0 | MLB | 1B | 2019 | 40 |
| 21 | Yadier Alvarez | 23.1 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 22 | Gerardo Carrillo | 20.6 | A+ | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 23 | Jordan Sheffield | 23.9 | A+ | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 24 | Miguel Vargas | 19.5 | A | 3B | 2022 | 40 |
| 25 | Carlos Rincon | 21.5 | A+ | RF | 2021 | 40 |
| 26 | Carlos Duran | 17.7 | R | RHP | 2024 | 40 |
| 27 | Robinson Ortiz | 19.3 | R | LHP | 2023 | 40 |
| 28 | Josh Sborz | 25.4 | AAA | RHP | 2019 | 40 |
| 29 | Andy Pages | 18.4 | R | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 30 | Zach Willeman | 23.1 | A | RHP | 2022 | 35+ |
| 31 | Cody Thomas | 24.6 | AA | OF | 2021 | 35+ |
| 32 | Leonel Valera | 19.8 | A | SS | 2023 | 35+ |
| 33 | John Rooney | 22.3 | A | LHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 34 | Jerming Rosario | 17.0 | R | RHP | 2024 | 35+ |
| 35 | Drew Jackson | 25.8 | MLB | SS | 2019 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
Some More Pitching Depth
Jeronimo Castro, RHP
Juan Morillo, RHP
Marshall Kasowski, RHP
Jamie Schultz, RHP
Shea Spitzbarth, RHP
Guillermo Zuniga, RHP
Braydon Fisher, RHP
Morgan Cooper, RHP
Riley Otteson, RHP
Orlandy Navarro, LHP
Stetson Allie, RHP
Castro throws hard, gets great extension, and he hides the ball really well. His changeup has movement and his slider plays up because of the deception. He’s got some helium. Morillo is a standard fastball/slider projection arm. He has average stuff but is 20, the age of a college sophomore. There’s disagreement about Kasowski, who struck out 111 in 64 innings last year. He sits 92-93 with life/rise and misses bats with the fastball, but some teams think that’s it, and that the secondaries are just okay. He’s 24 and did most of his damage at Low-A last year. Schultz is a fine big league middle reliever with three pitches — 95-97, plus curveball, and hard slider. He’s 27. Spitzbarth is a plus athlete with a plus changeup. The fastball plays a little better than its velo and he’ll probably be a solid middle reliever. Zuniga was throwing really hard last year, at times up to 99. He also has a monster curveball and some feel, but he’s a thick, 3 athlete, and his velo is down this spring. Fisher, Cooper, and Otteson all have good stuff but have dealt with injuries. Fisher had Tommy John within the last two weeks, so we won’t see him until late next year. Cooper still hasn’t pitched in pro ball and Otteson has been very wild when he has. Navarro has a below average fastball but a good split and curveball. Allie throws really hard and is still quite wild.
Hitters
Connor Joe, OF/3B
Sauryn Lao, 3B
Marcus Chiu, INF
Starling Heredia, OF
Jared Walker, 1B
Niko Hulsizer, OF
Joe has bounced around after being a Rule 5 selection, but is back with LA. He made substantive changes to his swing while there originally, and is a viable bench bat without a real position. Lao has power and somehow makes quality contact even when he takes awkward swings. His future position is also unclear but he has a shot to stay at third. Chiu has tumbled down the defensive spectrum a bit and is seeing time at first and third rather than the middle infield, but he has some pop, too. Heredia is tooled up but is striking out almost 50% of the time. Walker and Hulsizer have goofy, strength-driven power.
System Overview
You can’t talk about this system without talking about player development, which has not only helped prospects you knew about turn into stars, but also contributed to breakouts from late-blooming big leaguers like Chris Taylor, Justin Turner, and Max Muncy. Driveline Baseball recently attempted to quantify the effectiveness of player development. The Dodgers are at the top of their list, and we’d have guessed they were at or near it (the same goes for most of the teams in the black).
The type of hitter in this system is fairly monochromatic — they all have big power, lift the ball consistently, and strike out a lot — which is a sign that the player dev group is successfully installing what it wants to, since most of the big league Dodgers look like that as well. Might there one day be a biodiversity problem in LA’s hitting population that enables opposing pitching staffs to solve all their bats? People with teams we’d consider to be at the forefront of understanding the interaction between hitters and pitchers as it’s currently constituted don’t think so.
How about all the injured college arms? Walker Buehler, Jose De Leon, Morgan Cooper, Michael Grove, Mitchell White, Zach Willeman, and Jordan Sheffield all had stock-altering injuries as amateurs but were good values where they were drafted if you just care about stuff. You could argue only Buehler has become anything from that group, but binary, pass/fail thinking is too narrow when considering this stuff.
The discourse surrounding the club’s 2015 International signing class — and that general era of Dodgers international scouting — haunts LA in several ways. Yes, some of the names are ugly. Alex Guerrero, Erisbel Arruebarrena, Hector Olivera, Yaisel Sierra, Yadier Alvarez, and Starling Heredia have fallen short. But Ronny Brito, Yusniel Diaz, and Oneil Cruz fetched something in trade and Sauryn Lao, Carlos Rincon, and Omar Estevez are still around and of note. The top international brass from this era is gone (more on that in a second) and the new group (Dave Finley, Ismael Cruz, Francisco Camps, etc.) has started to get their feet in the major markets (the late signings of Pages, Duran, Vargas in 2017, Cartaya in 2018) while continuing to do well in Mexico.
Let’s talk about the timeline of the DOJ’s investigation. Andrew Friedman was brought on as the Dodgers’ president of ops in the fall of 2014, when most of the 2015 July 2 agreements had likely already been agreed upon by the international scouting staff Friedman inherited. Shortly after the Dodgers spent all that money on players like Alvarez, they let go of many of those international scouts. Who knew what, when they knew it, and what they did once they became aware of potential illegal activity during that 10 month span could be a problem for individuals who weren’t involved in the initial dirt.
It’s a good system, but it goes from good to G.O.A.T. if they somehow managed to trade for Twins generational superstar electrifying prospect Wander Javier.
LOLOLOL I gotta say I love the dedication to this schtick
On your chart for Carlos Duran it says he’s 5’9″
on it, thanks
Trackman data made you list Y.Alavrez again. Meaning spin rate, batted ball or? Curious if you could expand on this?
Great thanks for responding
Outside of Kershaw (HoFer) and Buehler (promising, but only 160 career IP), who was the last SP the Dodgers developed into a top starter?
I’ll wait a while, bc AFAIK you have to go back to….Orel Hershisher. It’s a new front office, I know, but that’s a pretty remarkable record of failure for an otherwise good org.
How many aces do you expect them to pull out of their culos? Most teams have one or zero aces.
If you’re not counting Stripling as a win for player development, I’d say your standard for what counts as successful is overly strict. Urias has also been good when healthy, so I think that’s a solid development unless you want to blame the dodgers for his injury, which is probably unfair. Maeda and Ryu were obviously not developed by the dodgers in the minor leagues, but both made highly successful transitions into mlb through the organization. This just doesn’t seem like an especially valid criticism.
Not to mention Hideo Nomo, Chan Ho Park, Ramón Martínez, Tim Belcher, Chad Billingsley, and Hiroki Kuroda. Admittedly, the philosophy was more focused on buying pitchers rather than building them for quite some time. But not sure how that is a pretty remarkable record of failure. Especially when they managed to stay near the top of the league in most notable pitching stats throughout that time frame.
Also I kind of forgot that Pedro Martínez guy.
Nomo and Kuroda are in the same boat as Maeda and Ryu, and should be considered free agents.
That’s fair enough. I was more listing them because they made their debuts and found success within the Dodgers organization. I don’t necessarily think that a players development ends the second they hit the professional level. Nor do I think that some of those pitchers would have found the same level of success in other organizations. But who knows?
That’s interesting, please provide your list of franchises with a long history of regularly developing FV65+ starting pitchers.
I’ll wait.
There’s like 12 such pitchers in MLB at any given time, no one produces them on the regular, and that doesnt even account for late career breakouts (Scherzer, or even Greinke).
I think you can attribute Greinke to KC. But guys like Scherzer (and Arrieta, sort of) aren’t easy to attribute to one organization.
The Indians have Kluber, Bauer, Bieber, Clevinger and should get credit for developing Carrasco.
Those aren’t all 65+, but they are all very good.
Bauer didn’t join Cleveland until after he already broke into the majors in Arizona. Kluber and Carrasco both also spent much of their minor league careers in other organizations. Not that they shouldn’t be credited for doing well but it’s not like they just did that all on their own
It turns out that it’s really hard to develop “top starters”. If you go through this team by team, you’ll find that a large number of teams fit this description. Ironically, the Rays– whose alumnus now runs the Dodgers–are one of the ones that aren’t like that.
But even if you take it seriously and go through the Dodgers org, they still have Kershaw, Buehler, and Billingsley. Sure, you say, what if you exclude Kershaw and Buehler? Well, what if you exclude Johnny Cueto from the Reds? Felix Hernandez and James Paxton from the Mariners? Aaron Nola and Cole Hamels from the Phillies? Or the Yankees when you exclude Pettite and Severino?
I think it’s fairer to say that the Dodgers have not been one of the best organizations at developing starting pitching talent in the 21st century or thereabouts. They’re not the Rays, or White Sox, Cleveland, Giants, or Athletics (although the A’s coast mostly on the Hudson-Zito-Mulder trio). They’re…like every other team.
The Dodgers make power hitters the way that the Yankees and Rays seem to manufacture dudes who can throw 97 with a good slider
So if you go through the Yankees and who has been their starting pitchers, you’ll see that relatively few of them are “home grown”. Unless we think German has arrived as a top-tier starter (and we should probably wait at least until the ASG to say that) then their starting pitchers from 2000-present heavily feature Sabathia, Tanaka, Clemens, and Mussina. It’s pretty hard to say they’ve developed any top pitchers recently aside from Severino and Pettite.
How many “top starters” do you think have come up in the past 15 years?
If you accept (as I’d think you have to) that the number is fewer than 60, then it’s hard for me to see how the Dodgers developing two of them is a “remarkable record of failure.”
Yadier Alvarez is only 23 , feels like we’ve been talking about him forever.
I’m going with Grove to shoot up into the 50 FV range. Started pro career at High A despite a long layoff due to TJ surgery, and though still shaking off the rust, has struck out 17 in his first 9.2 pro innings.
Do you think you’ll finish your top lists before the season is over? Kind of cool that seems you intend to go on a year-round cycle: at this pace you can just start the 2020 best prospect lists immediately on finishing the 2019. Now that we’re in May and close to 1/5 of the minor league season has been played, should you not start to take this season’s performance into account? Seems silly to ignore and keep pretending that these are post-2018 season lists. I think Lux, in particular, is someone’s whose performance so far this year has to be taken into account if doing an evaluation of him at this date.
This is getting down votes but it is a very legitimate complaint. I know the quality of these lists is very high, but there needs to be a better way where these lists can come out in a timely fashion. Having 2 writers apparently made no difference compared to the 1 writer of most of last winter. For any paying customers this should be considered unacceptable.
Zach Reks needs to be on this list somewhere (even if it’s other prospects of note). He was a 2017 draft pick out of Kentucky and all he has done has hit since he’s debuted in the Dodgers minor league system.
Due to him being a 4 year college graduate, he’s a bit older (25 y/o) than the average player for AA but a .368 AVG/ .448 OBP / 1.067 OPS with 6 HR in 76 at bats in 2019 to go along with a career .317/.391/.826 minor league line screams future bench bat at a minimum.
Jacob Amaya is listed as 6’0″ and 180 lbs, but in your write-up you call him a “diminutive infielder.” Is this tongue in cheek, are the Dodgers wildly exaggerating his size, or is that just diminutive next to the likes of Corey Seager, Carlos Correa, and some of the other gigantor middle infielders we’re seeing these days?