Top 35 Prospects: Milwaukee Brewers
Below is an analysis of the prospects in the farm system of the Milwaukee Brewers. Scouting reports are compiled with information provided by industry sources as well as my own observations. For more information on the 20-80 scouting scale by which all of our prospect content is governed, you can click here. For further explanation of the merits and drawbacks of Future Value, read this.
All of the numbered prospects here also appear on The Board, a resource the site offers featuring sortable scouting information for every organization. It can be found here.
| Rk | Name | Age | Highest Level | Position | ETA | FV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brice Turang | 20.5 | A+ | SS | 2023 | 50 |
| 2 | Mario Feliciano | 21.5 | AA | C | 2022 | 45+ |
| 3 | Tristen Lutz | 21.8 | A+ | RF | 2022 | 45+ |
| 4 | Ethan Small | 23.3 | A | LHP | 2021 | 45 |
| 5 | Aaron Ashby | 22.0 | A+ | LHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 6 | Antoine Kelly | 20.5 | A | LHP | 2023 | 40+ |
| 7 | Max Lazar | 21.0 | A | RHP | 2022 | 40+ |
| 8 | Eduardo Garcia | 17.9 | R | SS | 2024 | 40+ |
| 9 | Corey Ray | 25.7 | AAA | CF | 2020 | 40+ |
| 10 | Hedbert Perez | 17.2 | R | OF | 2024 | 40+ |
| 11 | Drew Rasmussen | 24.8 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 12 | Zack Brown | 25.5 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 13 | Joe Gray | 20.2 | R | CF | 2023 | 40 |
| 14 | Alec Bettinger | 24.9 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 15 | Clayton Andrews | 23.4 | AA | LHP/CF | 2021 | 40 |
| 16 | Carlos Rodriguez | 19.5 | R | CF | 2022 | 40 |
| 17 | Dylan File | 24.0 | AA | RHP | 2022 | 40 |
| 18 | Payton Henry | 22.9 | A+ | C | 2022 | 40 |
| 19 | Thomas Dillard | 22.8 | A | 1B | 2022 | 40 |
| 20 | Devin Williams | 25.7 | MLB | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 21 | David Hamilton | 22.7 | R | SS | 2023 | 40 |
| 22 | Victor Castaneda | 21.8 | AAA | RHP | 2021 | 40 |
| 23 | Nick Kahle | 22.3 | A+ | C | 2023 | 40 |
| 24 | David Fry | 24.5 | A | C | 2022 | 40 |
| 25 | Trey Supak | 24.0 | AAA | RHP | 2020 | 40 |
| 26 | Micah Bello | 19.9 | R | CF | 2022 | 40 |
| 27 | Korry Howell | 21.8 | A | CF | 2022 | 40 |
| 28 | Tyrone Taylor | 26.4 | MLB | CF | 2020 | 35+ |
| 29 | Angel Perdomo | 26.1 | AAA | LHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 30 | Nick Bennett | 22.8 | A | LHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 31 | Je’Von Ward | 20.6 | A | RF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 32 | Alexis Ramirez | 20.9 | R | RHP | 2023 | 35+ |
| 33 | Pablo Abreu | 20.6 | A | CF | 2023 | 35+ |
| 34 | Braden Webb | 25.1 | AA | RHP | 2020 | 35+ |
| 35 | Cam Robinson | 20.7 | R | RHP | 2022 | 35+ |
Other Prospects of Note
Grouped by type and listed in order of preference within each category.
The Last Two Cuts
Bowden Francis, RHP
Reese Olsen, RHP
Both of these guys have a shot to be 40-man arms relatively soon. Francis is up to 95 from a funky, lower slot that also helps him create effective two-plane movement on a breaking ball. He missed a lot of upper-level bats last year but in my opinion has relief-only control, and doesn’t have no-doubt big league bullpen stuff. Olsen’s stride is longer now than it was when he was in high school and it’s helped him throws strikes. He’s up to 96 and his breaking ball has power and finish beneath the zone. He’s another Brewers pitcher with a value-adding delivery.
Recent International Signees
Eduarqui Fernandez, OF
Luis Medina, OF
Jesus Parra, 3B
Jeferson Quero, C
A $1.1 million signee, Fernandez is a R/R corner outfield projection bat with present feel to hit. He’s already quite a bit more physical now than he was as an amateur, so I’m not sure how much more power is coming. Medina has an interesting swing: he takes a big leg kick but lands very upright, whereas most kickers have very flexible front sides. While he has fairly advanced feel for contact, most international scouts thought he was a tweener. Those who think he’s more projectable than the average evaluator see a chance for him to be a regular. Parra is a stocky infielder with an advanced bat. Quero is a glove and contact-oriented teenage catcher with modest body projection and athleticism.
Young Sleeper Arms
Lun Zhao, RHP
Brayan Salaya, RHP
Pablo Garabitos, RHP/OF
Harold Chirino, RHP
Kelvin Bender, LHP
Zhao is a few months shy of 19 but probably won’t pitch again until he’s 20 as he’s rehabbing from a late 2019 TJ. He was up to 93 and flashed a plus curveball (he averages 3,000 rpm) in 2018. Salaya has a good frame and was up to 95 as a 19-year-old last year. Garabitos, 19, played both ways last season but his best shot at making it is as a lefty reliever. Chirino missed all of 2018 with injury, then came back last year throwing really hard, 92-95, up to 97. He’s 22. Bender is an athletic, small high school lefty who shows good touch and feel in the bullpen but struggles to throw strikes in games. He’ an interesting athletic projection follow with a good changeup.
Potential Utility Types
Yeison Coca, SS
Antonio Pinero, SS
Felix Valerio, 2B
Daniel Castillo, 2B
Of this group, Coca is the most well-rounded, Pinero is the best defender, Valerio has the best bat-to-ball skills, and Castillo has the most physical projection.
High School Projection Drafts Three Years Removed
Chad McClanahan, 1B
Caden Lemons, RHP
McClanahan has a high offensive bar to clear and he has the power to do it, but he hasn’t really performed. Lemons’ velo has been all over the place in pro ball, and he didn’t pitch last year. Both of these guys are the big-framed types who sometimes develop late.
Older Guys
Justin Topa, RHP
Lucas Erceg, 3B
Bobby Wahl, RHP
Cooper Hummel, LF
Luis Contreras, RHP
C.J. Hinojosa, 2B
You’ve probably seen a lot of these names before. Topa is pushing 30 and was working in mop-up duty with a nameless jersey this spring, but he’s an Indy ball signee who I saw touch 99, so he’s a great story waiting to happen. Wahl is also an older relief contributor. Erceg might be a candidate for conversion at this point. Hummel is a corner bat with some pop and experience as a catcher. Hinojosa have a shot to be bench role players. Contreras, 24, signed with the Cubs in 2015 but never threw a pitch for them, and didn’t pitch in pro ball until last year. He pitched pretty well in the Low-A bullpen, touching 95 with plus spin and an effectual axis.
System Overview
The Brewers have contended for the last two years, which means they’ve traded prospects and other assets for big leaguers, weakening the system pretty significantly. They’ve also pretty meaningfully reconfigured the structure of their scouting during that time (they have just two people listed as pro scouts on this year’s org roster) and this, combined with it having been a while since they last traded for a bunch of prospects, makes it tough to nail down the org’s tendencies on the pro side.
On the amateur side, pitch data clearly seems important. Last year I mentioned that this org appears to desire mechanical uniqueness moreso than other clubs, which I still think is true. The Brewers also have more junior college and Venezuelan prospects than the average org.
Eric Longenhagen is from Catasauqua, PA and currently lives in Tempe, AZ. He spent four years working for the Phillies Triple-A affiliate, two with Baseball Info Solutions and two contributing to prospect coverage at ESPN.com. Previous work can also be found at Sports On Earth, CrashburnAlley and Prospect Insider.
Minor correcton: Troy Stokes was claimed by the Tigers at the end of last year.
Updated – thanks for the catch!
One more small one, Jay Jackson signed to play in Japan this season and is no longer in the Brewers organization.
D’oh! Thanks. Further updated.
HOMER: (ANNOYED GRUNT)
Oh. The brewers deserve credit for competing earnestly whenever the opportunity arises. But, this sure looks like the system of a team about to undertake a full rebuild, starting with reloading the system itself.
Competing earnestly? They’ve won the 9th most games in MLB since Stearns arrived, more than either of the Rays or A’s or even the perpetually prospect laden Braves.
About to undertake a full rebuild? They have the best non-Trout player in Yelich, the best reliever in Hader, a really good young starter in Woodruff, a naturally gifted hitter at 2B in Hiura, a post prospect at SS in Urias who some outlets ranked higher than Hiura, a plethora of interesting arms in Burnes, Peralta, Houser, Lindblom, Lauer.
5 or 6 contributors does not a winner make. Where are they going to get the other MLB quality players? Its not like they can just go buy players. I could see them hanging on for this shortened season, but a rebuild is inevitable. This is the cost of trying to win for mid market teams. The system is broke, but neither the owners nor the players want to fix it.
One reason the Brewers have been so successful since Stearns & company arrived is because they’ve been able to find value where others see none. I trust in their ability to continue to supplement the core with complimentary pieces despite limited financial & prospect capital.
If they intended to rebuild in the near term, they never would have extended Yelich. Mark Attanasio is not Bob Nutting.
2017 the Brewers had 7 players crack 2.0 fWAR, destroyed all projections to win 86 games & missed the playoffs by 1 game.
2018 the Brewers had 6 players crack 2.0 fWAR, destroyed all the projections again, won 96 games & missed the World Series by 1 game.
2019 the Brewers had 7 players crack 1.9 fWAR, made the postseason again & were 6 outs from knocking the eventual WS Champion out of the tournament.
You’re right, 5-6 players won’t do. You need 6-7.
The Nationals had 10 players with 2.3 or more fWAR. Looks like the Brewers would need more than just 6 or 7.
Yes because beating the projections annually is sure to continue, just ask Baltimore.
I’m giving them credit for competing. What do you think I meant? But with a farm system this light it means their window with Yelich is a year or two.
How much did Thames, Shaw, Aguilar, Moustakas, Gamel, Gio Gonzalez, Chacin and Miley cost?
A lot of these guys were from the 2018 team, but this front office has some clear skill at finding useful supplementary guys… Yelich and to a lesser extent Hader and Woodruff is a huge leg up on much of the league, regardless of how small the rest of the budget is.
Yeah, so did the Orioles. Finding under the radar guys in free agency works until it doesn’t. Now, to be fair, the Brewers have a higher floor than the Orioles did, but this is a team that absolutely needs to keep finding these complementary pieces.
I wish we had emojis on here, because I could really use the one-raised eyebrow one when someone tries to put Stearns and Duquette on the same level..
A better counterargument (that I’m not advancing) is that the Brewers have merely been beneficiaries of being one of the few teams willing to guarantee low 1-year money to veterans over 30 in the previous couple of offseasons. That argument really doesn’t give the FO enough credit, because they put together a very good core, and that’s extremely difficult to do. I also don’t think that approach is entirely different from the offseason strategy that created the 2013 Red Sox, except the financial ceiling of each team is grotesquely different, which just makes me more impressed by what Milwaukee’s been up to, tbh.
So where I agree with you is that the Brewers are better than the Orioles were. Much of this is that they’re pretty creative with the bullpen (even better than Showalter was back in the day), and they are really good at shifting. Oh, and their top two offensive pieces are both likely going to be one-win better than the Orioles’ were (Yelich/Machado, Hiura/Schoop).
Beyond that, I would argue that like the Orioles (and the Rangers) of a few years ago, the team has had a lot of success with low-cost veteran pickups on the free agent market and overwhelmingly beating its run differential, which compensated for the lack of homegrown talent. The problem is that both of those things are hard to do and unlike a team with a foundation of a great deal of controllable talent you have to keep doing it every year. They’re unlikely to collapse like the Orioles did for a number of reasons, but it’s exceptionally hard to build a consistent winner with different players contributing every year and on such thin margins.
The thing about “giving credit for competing earnestly” is that neutral fans and national baseball writers praise teams for doing things that are not in the long-term best interest of the team. The Brewers are the latest example, but before them the same thing has happened to the Giants, Tigers, Orioles, Mariners, and Phillies. They refused to take a step back and restock even when the writing was on the wall that they probably wouldn’t win a World Series with their core, and rather than trade assets, they ended up heading over a cliff.
Of course the Royals are the one example of a good but not great mid market team that went for it and actually won, but they were far from the best team in baseball in 2015. I’m not sure their model is very sustainable, because it relies on a lot of lucky breaks. The Brewers themselves got the best possible outcome from their series of win now moves (including Yelich turning into a Hall of Famer before our eyes), but they aren’t currently and haven’t the past few years been the best team in the Central, and they have the worst farm system in baseball now.
The Royals went what, twenty years without a winning season? Or was that the Pirates? Milwaukee is one of the most exciting teams to watch in today’s game…
The long term best interest of a small to mid market is to capitalize on windows with little shelf life relative to the other half of the league.
I think there is recency bias with the Astros and Cubs tanking to the WS as The Way, because there are a whole lot of teams that tank and then just plain suck for ten or twenty years, and MLB was more fun when there were fewer teams deliberately being teh suck. And there’s a willful inability to ignore that both those franchises are able to jack their payrolls up to $200m+ dollars to extend a window, when small to mid markets aren’t going to be scratching the top third of the league, even when they raise payroll during the window.
Ascheff. Thank you. That was my exact point. They leveraged their farm system to go for it with Yelich and I admire that commitment. But with not much help left in the minors that window will be short and they will need to start rebuilding the farm even now while they still try to compete.
Dear heavens, this is awful. They’ve got one guy who might be able to be a slick-fielding, no-power shortstop in the Freddy Galvis mode (Turang), one guy who might stick as a three-true-outcomes RF (Lutz), and a few of guys with almost no pro track record who have the toolkit to be starters (Garcia, Perez, Garcia).
Beyond that, it’s all bullpen guys, catchers who can’t catch/make contact/both, and center fielders who can’t make any contact. I guess there’s a couple guys without enough power to really stick either like Andrews and Rodriguez too.
Of all these guys, it looks like they have 11 guys who could either become a pretty good reliever or a back-end starter if things break right, but no more than half of them will and potentially a lot less. I’d say they’ll get two starters of some kind out of Lutz, Turang, Small, and Dillard, and if they’re lucky they’ll get one out of Garcia, Perez, and Garcia, but the bust rates are huge on guys that young. That’s 18 prospects. For the remaining 17, if this is how the industry views them, the Brewers should trade them for whatever they can get.
Other shortstops in the Freddy Galvis mode: Miguel Rojas, Elvis Andrus, Brandon Crawford, Addison Russell. I suppose there’s always a chance he is going to hit better, but he doesn’t have 70-grade speed to help him out so it’s going to be pretty tough.
Yes, the system is pretty barren at the moment, but the only real misstep on the amateur side the Brewers have made since Stearns & company arrived seems to be drafting Ray at #5 in 2016.
The system was actually pretty well regarded when Stearns & company first came on board (5th/7th per Sickels in 2016/17), but if you examine the record of prospects traded versus prospects retained it looks like the right call has been made in every instance so far.
I also think their pitching development has evolved considerably under Stearns & company so I expect at a couple two tree of the guys on this list to outperform their draft position/scouting reports, or at the very least have whatever skill sets they do possess maximized.
The problem with the Brewers isn’t necessarily the draft. Too soon to judge on 2019, but:
The Good:
-Did well in the rounds 3+ in 2016
-Hiura and Lutz in Rounds 1-2 in 2017, plus a couple of interesting guys starting in round 10/11 (Lazar, Bettinger(.
– Got a couple decent pitching prospects in the mid-rounds (Rasmussen, Ashby) in 2018 plus Turang was a good pick int the 1st.
The Bad:
-Whiffed real bad in 2016 on first two picks–Ray over Puk, Manning, and Garrett was definitely a bad call, and Erceg looks bad too.
-After Lutz, the Brewers whiffed on the next EIGHT picks in 2017
-Gray and Bello in the 2nd round were very likely mistakes in 2018.
This basically just looks like, “you win some, you lose some.” This isn’t noticeably above or below average compared with other teams.
Where the Brewers really are doing poorly is in the J2 Market. There are only 3 names here who were signed in the 2016-2018 J2 periods and have an FV of 40 or better. Of the 26 other teams that have been profiled aside from the Brewers, there are 180 players who match that criteria–so almost 7 per team. The Brewers are getting crushed internationally.
A+ handle
Seems like there is a heavier density of long-stride/hides-the-ball-well pitchers on this list. I wonder, is that because they’re the leftovers from recent trades (i.e. not what other teams are interested in) or is that a particular mold of player that the Brewers like?
Youch. Is this the worst system? Or am I forgetting how bad some others maybe were?
I’d say either the brewers or nationals have the worst system
Boston is pretty bad. Rankings are kind of silly because aren’t we just describing several positions of a cycle?
I think they’re going to get a surprising amount of utility from some college arms: Small, Ashby, Supak, and Bennett
Lutz seems like a quietly solid prospect, ready for AA at 21 is solid with quality tools and production
Feliciano outhit Miguel Amaya on the year in the Carolina League at the same so he seems interesting. I do hate this automated strike zone shit THO, needlessly feeding the agenda of the sports entertainment and gambling complex. I know players and fans want it but that’s
Seems like a pretty amazing farm system I wonder how this ranks overall? 4th or maybe 6th at the worst??
I think that the Brewers approach to pitching will see them get more out of the low-celing or in some ways flawed SP prospects on this list than might otherwise be expected.. They usually don’t have their pitchers go 6-7 innings, and they make use of 2-3 inning stints for relievers a lot, and tend to use them in situational and creative ways. Often a SP prospect who doesn’t stick in the rotation, and who doesn’t have the overwhelming stuff in relief, would lose a lot of value once not in the rotation anymore. I expect the Brewers to be better than most at utilizing the skills pitchers like that do have and find a use for them. The much-maligned Brewers rotations in recent years have been missing #1 or even #2 types, but what has been a strength for them has been that their #4-#8 starters (or thereabouts) have been better than those of many other teams. They value depth a lot, and among their high-minors arms (mostly college arms it seems) they’ll get a fair bit out of the likes of File, Brown, Bettinger, Ashby, Rasmussen, Small, Supak etc. Despite none of them ever likely to be a #1-#2 type of guy.