Top of the Order: Jordan Montgomery’s Option Transforms Arizona’s Offseason

Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports

Welcome back to Top of the Order, where every Tuesday and Friday I’ll be starting your baseball day with some news, notes, and thoughts about the game we love.

Jordan Montgomery has been bad in his first season with the Diamondbacks. A 6.44 ERA is bad, a 5.23 xERA is bad, a 15.5% strikeout rate is bad, a .377 wOBA allowed is bad. We all know these things. (Dad, if you’re reading this, and I know you are: You now know these things. All those stats are bad.) So I’m not going to spend too much time belaboring that point. But Montgomery’s badness has cascading effects beyond just how long to stick with him in the rotation or if he’ll even be on the playoff roster the Diamondbacks almost certainly will be constructing.

Montgomery agreed to a deal with the Diamondbacks just before Opening Day for a contract paying him a guaranteed $25 million this year, and it crucially came with a vesting player option for Montgomery, as negotiated by his agent at the time, Scott Boras. (Montgomery has since left Boras for Joel Wolfe and Nick Chanock at Wasserman.) If Montgomery had made fewer than 10 starts this year, he simply would’ve become a free agent after the World Series; this was meant to limit Arizona’s risk if Montgomery sustained a long-term injury while ramping up after his late signing.

But what it didn’t protect the Diamondbacks from was ineffectiveness, and Montgomery’s 2025 is now in his hands. The option value began at $20 million, when Montgomery made his 10th start, and then went up to $22.5 million upon his 18th start. It will reach its maximum value of $25 million with four more starts. Since Montgomery is very much in the “he would probably have to take a one-year pillow contract” territory, I’d be absolutely shocked if he didn’t take the $25 million payday. The best he can hope for now is that next year, after getting a normal offseason and a full spring training, he pitches more like he did when he dominated during the 2023 postseason, so that his value rebounds when he becomes free agent again after the 2025 season.

The downstream effects on any team’s payroll would be notable — $25 million is a lot! — but especially so for the Diamondbacks. The Snakes currently have $171 million committed to this season, their highest payroll ever, and $63 million committed to next year. If Montgomery makes four more starts and elects to stay with the team, next year’s figure would jump to $88 million. On the surface, you’d think that would give Arizona a ton of room to build a team just as good as this one, but the payroll can increase very sharply, very quickly.

That $63 million number is only what’s actually committed to players as of this second, mainly the guaranteed money to Eduardo Rodriguez, Ketel Marte, Lourdes Gurriel Jr., and Corbin Carroll. Also included are the presumed buyouts of the mutual options (which are virtually never exercised) for Joc Pederson, Randal Grichuk, and Scott McGough. That $63 million also includes the combined $3 million in buyouts that the D-backs would need to pay if they don’t pick up their club options on Eugenio Suárez and Merrill Kelly. Suárez’s option could go either way, so for now we’ll just assume that it’s declined, but Kelly’s seems like a no-brainer to get picked up for just $7 million. Working off of that (adding the $7 million and subtracting the $1 million buyout they won’t have to pay him), we’re now at $69 million, or $94 million with Montgomery. That figure would be about 55% of this year’s franchise-record payroll for just six players.

Onto the arbitration-eligible players: Zac Gallen, A.J. Puk, Ryan Thompson, Kevin Ginkel, and Joe Mantiply have gone through arbitration before and should all stick around; they’re making about $14.3 million combined this year. If we conservatively assume that in the aggregate they get raises of 25%, that’s another $18 million or so added to next year’s payroll, for a total of $112 million. Throw in $3 million combined for the guys who’ll be in their first year of arbitration — Alek Thomas and Geraldo Perdomo — and we’re all the way up to two-thirds of this year’s payroll. Pre-arbitration players should account for, at absolute minimum, another $10 million or so, and boom, that brings the figure up to $125 million, 70% of where it’s at this season.

All of that would leave the D-backs plenty of room to build another really good team if they didn’t have any significant free agents to replace, but of course, they almost certainly will. Pederson has been quietly elite as a platoon DH; despite playing exactly zero games in the field and facing lefties only 30 times, he’s compiled 3.1 WAR because he’s just so darn good at mashing righties. Christian Walker, currently on the IL with an oblique strain, is set to hit free agency entering his age-34 season, so he’s not in line for a huge deal, but he’d still probably reject Arizona’s qualifying offer and look for a longer contract.

Perhaps 7th-ranked prospect Jordan Lawlar is able to factor into the infield, making Suárez’s possible departure easier to swallow, but there’s no heir apparent to Walker at first or Pederson at DH. The D-backs traded away their offense-first prospects Andrés Chaparro and Deyvison De Los Santos, and Tommy Troy — their other top-100 prospect — is struggling in High-A and years away from the majors. Perhaps Gurriel Jr. spends more time at DH next season to keep him fresh, with a speedy outfield of Carroll, Thomas, and Jake McCarthy, though without Pederson and Walker, that certainly makes for a worse offense. Signing at least one starting-caliber player would cost (again, conservatively) at least $12 million, which would bring them to 80% of this season’s payroll.

Again, all of these estimates are conservative, and I’m including only the bare minimum investment that the Diamondbacks would have to make to continue to have a competitive, complete roster. All of this to say: They may have to get creative. With Montgomery and Kelly both expected to be around next season, Arizona will have six starters (Montgomery, Kelly, Rodriguez, Gallen, Ryne Nelson, and Brandon Pfaadt) for five rotation spots. The D-backs could trade from that surplus to fill a position of need, just as they did a couple offseasons ago when they dealt Daulton Varsho for Gabriel Moreno and Gurriel Jr.

Teams would line up for Pfaadt, Nelson quietly has been worth a solid 2.0 WAR, and even if he hasn’t pitched like an ace for over a year now, Gallen still has notable trade value as he enters his final year before free agency. I’m not saying the Diamondbacks definitely will trade a starter, but it’s something they should consider. The Orioles, for example, are rich in young position players and have just three rotation spots (Grayson Rodriguez, Dean Kremer, and Trevor Rogers) locked in for next year.

Of course, if Montgomery bounces back next season, Arizona won’t regret paying him $25 million, but unless ownership decides to increase payroll, things are going to be tight. The primary focus for the Diamondbacks right now is on defending their National League title, but regardless of how long they last during their probable return to the postseason, tough decisions may be awaiting them on the other side of October.





28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
5 months ago

I’m guessing if they just put him on waivers now somebody would claim him. $25 million over 1 year isn’t bad for someone with his track record. Yankees and Orioles could use him for example.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

They could probably also trade Gurriel at cost. The Royals, Angels, and Pirates are getting nothing out of one of their corner outfield slots.

formerly matt w
5 months ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Though for the Pirates, part of the reason they’re getting nothing is that they refuse to pay $14 million for a Gurriel type. Hence moves like trading for Bryan de la Cruz on purpose. I would guess that they would be more likely to try to roll with some combination of de la Cruz, Billy Cook, and Nick Yorke (who they also traded for) rather than pick Gurriel up at cost, though I’d hope that they are at least as good as me at opening up these guys’ player pages and reading their projections.

Pepper Martin
5 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

The Yankees want to lower payroll next season. Let’s assume they just keep it the same as this year. Assuming they pay Soto ~$55 million / year, they’ll have about $25 million in payroll flexibility, and will need to get a First Baseman, Third Baseman (or 2nd if they want to play Chisholm at 3rd), and virtually an entirely new bullpen. They will have no interest in paying $25 million for a broken starter.

sbf21
5 months ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Soto isn’t going to come close to $55M unless Steve Cohen loses his mind. He’s not going to receive almost 20% more than Ohtani. In any case, the Yankees certainly won’t be forking over that amount.

But I agree that they will have no interest in Montgomery at $22M+.

Last edited 5 months ago by sbf21
Pepper Martin
5 months ago
Reply to  sbf21

I fully expect Cohen to start with 12 years, $600 million and for the bidding to go up from there. My guess is that he’ll resign with the Yankees for ~ 13 years, $700 million.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
5 months ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

They’d have to make a decision that penalties for exceeding the salary strata don’t matter to them. It’s possible.

Pepper Martin
5 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

The Yankees have a TON of money coming off the books this year; they could give Soto $55 million/year and still lower payroll substantially if they used promotions to fill the bullpen and 1B/3B holes. Contracts disappearing this offseason:

Soto, $31 million
Rizzo, $17 million ($6 mill buyout next year)
Torres, $14.2 million
Verdugo, $8.7 million
Donaldson, $8 million buyout
Holmes, $6 million
Kahnle, $5.75 million
Loaisiga, $2.5 million
Weaver, $2 million
Hill, $1.8 million
Trivino, $1.5 million

That’s $92.45 million; even if they pay Soto $55 million, that would lower their payroll by over $30 million just by clearing out players who’ve contributed a total of 2.4 fWAR all season. They could also clear even more payroll by non-tendering some arbitration eligible players they don’t need:

Grisham, $5.5 million
Jon Berti, $3.62 million
Tim Mayza, $3.59 million
JT Brubaker, $2.27 million
Leiter, $1.5 million

Even if they keep Grisham around as a 4th outfielder behind Judge, Soto, and Dominguez, you’re still looking at a team that could sign Soto, a corner infielder, and two big-name relievers and STILL have a lower payroll next year than this year.

slz
5 months ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

Mets also have a ton of money coming off the books this season so you have a bidding war set up if theyre interested in one although theyve already sent out some signals they may not be if Soto gives off vibes that he’s just using them

sbf21
5 months ago
Reply to  Pepper Martin

I believe that you’re $100M too high unless Soto is willing to defer a big chunk of that money to reduce the AAV $6M-$8M.

I’ve been thinking $46M x13yr =$598; $50M x 12yr; $40M x 15yr… You get the idea. I’m at $600M.

slz
5 months ago
Reply to  sbf21

I really dont see any reason for Soto to settle for less than the PV of Ohtani’s AAV, which is 46.1. Then it just comes down to how many years a team goes to

Lanidrac
5 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

$25M would be a pretty fair salary for his previous track record before this season, but highly doubt anyone would take that contract right now.

johndarc
5 months ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

The Yankees didn’t want him when he was already on their team and cheaper. The Orioles could have signed him in the offseason as well when he had more luster.

Now he’s expensive, bad, and a year older

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
5 months ago
Reply to  johndarc

When you have a chance to get a Harrison Bader you have to take it