Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Is a Superstar Again

Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

If you’re speaking with someone from Toronto who doesn’t follow baseball, they can probably tell you two things about the Blue Jays. The first is that Vladimir Guerrero Jr. is the best player on the team. The second is that Vladimir Guerrero Jr. sucks.

The first point is pretty accurate, and it’s absolutely true this season — more on that in a moment. The second point is categorically false, but alas, such is the curse of superstardom. The player who has his face on posters all around the city is going to get plenty of credit when things go right, but he’s also going to shoulder an excessive amount of criticism when things go wrong. When you’re the guy starring in the Uncrustables ads, fans expect a crust-free performance on the field, too.

Guerrero made a name for himself in 2021, which was no easy task considering the man with whom he shares his name. Yet, with 48 home runs, 111 RBI, and a runner-up finish for AL MVP, Guerrero gave the average Torontonian a reason to talk about baseball for the first time since José Bautista was punched in the face. Then, Guerrero spent the next two years corroding his golden reputation. To be clear, no one who knows what they’re talking about ever thought he was a bad ballplayer — heck, he set a new record for the highest salary ever awarded in an arbitration hearing this past offseason — but his performance certainly went downhill. If all you were comparing him to was the best version of himself (like that motivational poster in your gym always tells you to do), he really was pretty disappointing last year:

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 2021-23
Season PA HR BB% K% AVG OBP SLG wRC+ WAR
2021 698 48 12.3% 15.8% .311 .401 .601 166 6.3
2022 706 32 8.2% 16.4% .274 .339 .480 133 3.4
2023 682 26 9.8% 14.7% .264 .345 .444 119 1.4

All that is to say, the criticism Guerrero faced wasn’t entirely unwarranted, even if it was overblown. The one thing the Blue Jays needed last season was a star-caliber performance from their star-caliber player. Their pitching staff finished fifth in the majors in WAR, and their defense won the AL team Gold Glove. The offense, however, came up short too often, finishing 14th in baseball in runs scored. In 2023, a superstar season from Guerrero was all the Blue Jays were missing. This year, in a bitter twist of fate, it’s just about all they have.

Indeed, while Toronto sits in last place in the AL East, Guerrero ranks among the top 10 AL position players with 4.0 WAR. His 167 wRC+ is fifth best among qualified batters in either league, trailing only Aaron Judge, Juan Soto, Bobby Witt Jr., and Shohei Ohtani. He also ranks among the top five hitters in OBP (.394), wOBA (.404), xwOBA (.414), and wRAA (39.5). His bat is every bit as potent as it was when he burst onto the scene. If he keeps this up, word will eventually trickle down to the non-baseball fans in the GTA that Guerrero, the best player on the team, no longer sucks (even though he never really did).

Ultimately, whether Guerrero thrives or flounders, he may never escape comparisons to his 2021 performance. Last year, superstar Vladdy was long gone. This year, he’s back in all his glory. With that in mind, I’d like to offer my own comparison that is hopefully a little more meaningful than the “It’s so over/We’re so back” meme. While his comprehensive offensive stats (i.e. wRC+) are almost identical in 2021 and ’24, I’m interested in the small differences that have led him to another superstar season.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

For one thing, post-All-Star break Guerrero is currently enjoying a run unlike anything we’ve ever seen from him before:

As of 08/15

To put the numbers on that graph into perspective, the difference between Guerrero over his past 25 games and Guerrero’s best 25 games at any other stretch in his career is 63 points of wRC+. That’s the difference between Barry Bonds (career 173 wRC+) and Adam LaRoche (110 wRC+). That’s nuts.

Bonkers comps aside, I’d take the exact numbers with a grain of salt, since we don’t have a great sense of the park factors at TD Ballpark and Sahlen Field, where the Blue Jays played their home games for the first four months of the 2021 season. All the same, it’s hard to deny that Guerrero is playing the best baseball of his career right now. Only four other players have had a higher OPS during any 25-game stretch (limited to a single season) over the past 10 years: Judge (2022, ’24), Ohtani (’23), Bryce Harper (’15), and Giancarlo Stanton (’17). Usually when a guy hits like this, even in such a small sample size, it’s almost a sure bet that he’s on his way to winning an MVP.

On the point of small sample sizes, I should clarify this isn’t a sustainable run for Guerrero. If common sense couldn’t tell you that, then his .432 BABIP should. Still, that doesn’t mean he hasn’t earned his success. This 100-PA rolling xwOBA graph looks a whole lot like the 25-game rolling wRC+ graph I included above:

One reason Guerrero’s numbers are so eye-popping as of late is that he has hit 11 home runs since the All-Star break. That matches his highest home run output from any 25-game stretch in 2021. Yet, he had far more of those stretches that season, finishing with a major league-leading 48 home runs. This year, he’s on pace for a mere 33 bombs. Indeed, his home run production is probably the biggest difference between his offensive profile in 2021 and ’24. However, that difference might not be as meaningful as it appears.

Firstly, Guerrero crushed 11 home runs over 21 games at TD Ballpark in Dunedin and added another 10 over 23 games at Sahlen Field in Buffalo. That’s a 77-homer pace over a full season… at a couple of minor league stadiums. To be fair, Guerrero crushed another 10 bombs in 36 games once the Blue Jays returned to Rogers Centre, which is still a 45-homer pace. However, it’s important to keep in mind that home runs were up all around the league in 2021 compared to ’24. What’s more, the Blue Jays made significant renovations to Rogers Centre that have made the ballpark far less homer-friendly over the past two seasons. For what it’s worth, Guerrero is on pace for 17 homers on the road this year, which would match his output from 2021.

It’s also worth pointing out that a ton of the home runs Guerrero has not hit have landed for doubles instead; the slugger has climbed down doubles to dingers mountain. While his home run output is down compared to 2021, he is on pace for 78 extra-base hits, which would match his total from that season. Indeed, he is only four doubles away from setting a new career high. Once again, this isn’t entirely sustainable — Guerrero’s .225 BABIP on fly balls is more than twice the league average — but you can’t look at his .585 xSLG and suggest he hasn’t earned his success. Guerrero remains a serious power threat, even if he’s hitting fewer home runs.

One last notable difference between Guerrero’s offensive numbers in 2021 and ’24 comes by way of the types of pitches he’s hitting. In 2021, Guerrero feasted on four-seam fastballs — more than any other hitter in the short history of Baseball Savant’s pitch arsenal stats (’19-present). Per Savant, he provided 34 runs of value against four-seamers that season. He also added another six runs of value against sinkers. In 2024, Guerrero is seeing heaters at a similar rate, but he has not been nearly as productive against them. He has a +6 RV against four-seamers and a neutral 0 RV against sinkers. His numbers against fastballs (not including cutters) are still above average, but they’re a far cry from what they were in 2021:

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. vs. Four-Seams and Sinkers
Year wOBA xwOBA RV/100
2021 .485 .482 3.3
2024 .374 .398 0.6
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

On the other hand, his numbers against all other pitches are the best they’ve ever been:

Vladimir Guerrero Jr. vs. Non-Fastballs and Cutters
Year wOBA xwOBA RV/100
2021 .358 .364 1.6
2024 .437 .432 3.2
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

All things considered, it doesn’t really matter which pitch types a batter succeeds against as long as he’s producing the same value in the aggregate. However, Guerrero’s strong performance against non-fastballs means he has been less vulnerable in pitcher-friendly counts this year, and I wonder if that has given him the freedom to be a little choosier with his swings. He is swinging at fewer pitches in the zone this year, leading to more called strikes. When he chooses to hack, however, his results are better than ever. His run value of +11 on swings this year ranks fifth in the majors and is already tied with his +11 RV on swings from 2021. He is one of only 22 qualified batters (out of 300) with a positive run value on swings. Unsurprisingly, his success on swings has played a huge role in his overall success.

The only disappointing differences between Guerrero’s two best seasons have come not at the plate, but in the other aspects of his game. Unfortunately, he is putting up some of the worst baserunning and defensive metrics of his career. As you might imagine, that’s really saying something. Guerrero ranks last among first basemen in Fielding Run Value and third worst among all players in BsR. Thus, he is “only” on pace for 5.3 WAR, a full win less than his 6.3 WAR in 2021. It’s not the end of the world, but even for a bat-only first baseman, there is a meaningful difference between poor defense and baserunning and atrocious defense and baserunning:

Vladimir Guerrero Jr.’s Defense and Baserunning
Year FRV BsR
2021 -3 -1.1
2024 -7 -4.4

We’ve written quite a bit here at FanGraphs (both directly and indirectly) about how Guerrero could get back to his peak form. They were all good ideas — hit fewer pitches but hit them harder, limit groundballs, pull more fly balls in the 95-105 mph EV bucket — but ultimately, Guerrero did it his own way. He’s making more contact, hitting more grounders, and pulling less than ever. He’s also using his remarkable raw power and beautiful swing to hit a lot of baseballs and hit them stupid hard. The results speak for themselves. He may look a little different, but in almost all the ways that matter, the 2021 version of Vladdy is back.





Leo has written for FanGraphs, MLB Trade Rumors, Baseball Prospectus, and Lindy’s Sports. You can follow him on Bluesky @leomorgenstern.bsky.social.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
matthayden4Member since 2024
2 years ago

Me and my mother are both big baseball fans, and this will be the third year in a row we do a mother-son trip to Toronto to catch some games. We’re catching the Angels next week because we wanted to see Mike Trout – alas, that won’t happen now – but if Vladdy is still playing like this, we kinda have Mike Trout at home, offensively?

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
2 years ago

It’s not a perfect comparison, but he’s just as tantalizing as a young Bryce Harper. He was incredibly hyped as a prospect and has looked like a downright hitting savant at times. At other times, he’s been a merely good hitter who unfairly gets labeled as a bust. He could post a wRC+ between say 110 and 185 in 2025 and none of those outcomes would surprise me.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I’d call 1.4 WAR pretty bad for him or anyone getting big bucks. It’s Rowdy Tellez territory. Not exactly replacement level but below average.

kojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

That’s not Rowdy Tellez territory. The guy has never come close to putting up 1.4 WAR in a single season. He’s had less than 0 WAR and below 100 wRC+ in 4 of his 6 seasons (not including his 2018 September call up). Rowdy’s been replaceable for nearly his entire career.

MikeD
2 years ago
Reply to  kojo

WAR is a useful guideline, but it’s still a mathematical formula awarding extra value to certain positions, and penalizing other positions quite heavily. If I’m constructing a MLB lineup and I’m focused on the offensive element, I know that 2024 Vlad is providing quite a bit of value. I’m not letting a WAR number limit my interest, but I am hoping other GMs are undervaluing him because of WAR when he’s a free agent. That will make my job easier.

Last edited 2 years ago by MikeD
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I understand where you’re coming from on this but it’s nearly impossible to compare Harper to Vlad Jr in terms of hype. Bryce Harper is probably the most hyped baseball prospect of the last 25 years. If you counted Ohtani as a prospect (which I don’t think makes sense) you might put him ahead, but I’m not confident about that.

If you made a list of the most hyped MLB prospects of the last 50 years, you’re probably putting A-Rod first and then either Harper or Ken Griffey Jr second. I’m pretty sure that Vlad Jr is not even in the top 5, not with Strasburg, Prior, Todd Van Poppel, Bo Jackson, and Andruw Jones out there.

96mncMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d have Harper ahead of everyone you mentioned. Harper was on the cover of SI as a high schooler. That’s insane for a baseball prospect.

RobM
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

David Clyde? : -)

I agree. Harper is the top of that list. Strasburg was up there, too.

synco
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d say Harper and Strasburg were #1 and 1A in terms of mass media hype around guys before they had played in MLB. ARod was big in the baseball world, but the hype around those two transcended the baseball world because they both had big origin stories.

Griffey IMO is #3, and would have been higher if he had arrived during the mass media/internet era. Him playing with his Dad was huge, and his Upper Deck Rookie card was a cultural phenomenon.

I’d also say the Van Poppel hype was darn close if not equal to ARod. It had faded by the time he got to the majors, but when he was drafted the origin story transcended baseball media.

Prior was probably a step below. Brien Taylor also belongs on the list somewhere. Andruw Jones I don’t remember getting huge hype – he was a great prospect, but it was more what he did after he got to the majors that made him famous, in particular the two HRs in his first WS game. You had to have a generational origin story to get really famous as a prospect back then.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Todd Van Poppel had media members declaring him the next Nolan Ryan. It wasn’t the first widespread and irresponsible comp in prospect history but it is one of the most memorable ones for me. I also have a soft spot for “Mauer with power” even though the hype machine never really cranked up too high.

synco
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Van Poppel hype was crazy. I think in large part it was because there just weren’t high school guys throwing in the high 90s at the time (there were barely any Major Leaguers throwing high 90s at the time). That he was also “unsignable” contributed to the mystique – a tool that since Van Poppel has been used many more times to great effect.

By Mauer with power I assume you mean Wieters? GREAT call… he’s been largely forgotten, but yeah the prospect hype around him was insane. It didn’t transcend baseball, but it was massive inside of baseball in the late 00s. He was projected to be putting up young Mickey Mantle numbers at catcher.

For prospects outside of baseball, my favorite example of “hugely hyped, then forgotten” is OJ Mayo. He came out shortly after LeBron and was hyped through the roof. Then he had a blah year at USC, a blah rookie year, and drifted out of consciousness. Further back in basketball lore, Felipe Lopez was hugely hyped in high school and then faded from relevance in college.

Last edited 2 years ago by synco
sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Yeah, it was Wieters, but my phone kept “autocorrecting”
it to other things and I gave up. But it recognized Mauer! I don’t think the hype train ever heated up to the same degree that it did for the other guys I mentioned, or even Vlad Jr. But the comps got out of control for him–kind of like Jason Heyward (who was getting Dave Winfield comps!).

It feels like the 2009-2012 era was probably the peak hype for prospects overall. Wieters and Heyward and Strasburg and Harper were getting tons of hype, but by the time they all graduated the machine seemed to die down a bit. The last guy I remember having truly irresponsible comps was Byron Buxton, and that was in 2014 and 2015. By the time Vlad Jr and Wander Franco and Paul Skenes came along it felt like everyone was just a lot more cautious about prospects.

Sure, there were some irresponsible comps thrown around but I don’t think it was the norm. But if Vlad Jr and Franco and Skenes had been prospects between 2009 and 2012 I think it would have been crazy.

tarvisMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I mean, to be fair Heyward’s WAR/162 avg is basically the same as Winfield’s … that comp is not THAT ridiculous.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  tarvis

It’s a lot harder to keep that pace up over 12,000 PAs than it is over 7,000! Heyward turned into a part-time player in Chicago because he was so bad, having to maneuver him around to make sure he didn’t get a bad matchup. In between age 20 and age 35 (which spots Heyward a little extra, since Winfield only had 150 PAs in 1973) Winfield has 2000 more PAs than Heyward.

And a lot of Winfield’s problems were because he fell off defensively at age 35. Heyward hasn’t even had his age-35 season yet. This was a totally unfair comp for any prospect except Bryce Harper, who is either the best prospect of all time or pretty close to it (although interestingly, Harper looks like he’s going to have a better career than Winfield).

synco
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Prospecting became a “thing” during the 00s, which probably in part drove the era of uber-hyped prospects – before then if your team had a truly generational prospect (e.g. ARod or Griffey) you knew about him, but there weren’t entire websites devoted to prospects, there weren’t big publicly available prospect lists, etc. I remember having a couple of bookmarks for a few amateur guys who would follow a local farm team, but other than that there just wasn’t anything out there other than BA, which was very nascent and mostly behind a paywall. This is even up until the mid-late 00s. Then John Sickels came along and changed everything.

But before that there just wasn’t any info on these guys. You literally didn’t know who was on your team’s AA roster. And you certainly didn’t know if they were 40s or 50s or 60s.

That era is also when the out-of-the-box stud started arriving with regularity – guys who would come up and immediately become superstars. There became a sense that you could draft a guy and he could be up and dominating within a year or two.

Put it all together, and you have this era of discovery hype. Everyone wanted to know who the next huge thing was.

FWIW the Skenes hype this year was pretty intense, and did transcend baseball media to some degree (though not to that of Harper/Strasburg of course). Definitely the most-hyped prospect in a while.

MikeD
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Definitely Harper and Strasburg are 1 and 2, or 1 and 1a. Crazy that the same organization was able to draft them #1 in back-to-back years. That’s the luck of timing.

A-Rod comes in at the #3 for me, although Griffey is very close.

Not sure where to slot Bo Jackson. Perhaps he knows? : -) The interest was immense. He transcended baseball, but there were also questions about if he could succeed with baseball as a part-time sport.

I forgot about Brien Taylor. A lefty high-school pitcher who could throw 100+ mph was unknown in those days, and the fact the Yankees were in the rare position with the #1 pick only added to the buzz. If not for a barroom brawl, he might have been the lost member of those dynasty teams from the mid-90s into the aughts. Does he feel a bit like Pete Best of the early Beatles when watching what might have become?

Beyond that, I have difficulty separating in my mind the buzz around players like Jones, Mauer, Skenes, Holliday and a few others. There was hype, but nothing like Harper and Strasburg.

What would the buzz have been around someone like Dave Winfield, drafted by the three major sports. if he arrived today?

Last edited 2 years ago by MikeD
Spahn_and_Sain
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeD

Winfield is crazy to imagine, especially skipping the minors entirely. I feel like they’d at least have at least tried him as a two-way player as well—so Ohtani buzz, but as a 22-year-old true rookie.

Last edited 2 years ago by Spahn_and_Sain
TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
2 years ago
Reply to  synco

Technically speaking, Jones was still a prospect when he hit those World Series home runs. Harper had way more pre-professional hype. No Latin players will ever have that much pre-professional hype.

Jones was the number one prospect in baseball two years in a row. That was really pre-Internet for practical purposes, so it was just a different world than when Harper came up. I do still think Harper was the more hyped prospect overall, especially if you aren’t giving Jones credit for hype that accrued after he debuted.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Hence why I said it’s not a perfect comparison. The more interesting parallel is the maddening inconsistency and flashes of greatness at a young age.

BTW, I agree that Harper came with more fanfare, but the hype train for Vlad Jr. was pretty intense as well. He’s the son of a beloved Hall of Famer and was getting Miguel Cabrera comps in the minors.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

I just don’t know that we really got much in the way of hyped prospects after Harper. I was trying to think through and I think Buxton got a fair amount of hype, and Vlad Jr was maybe on the same level as Buxton. But I think there was a general overall decline in the hype machine–everyone just kind of calmed down. But if Vlad Jr had been a prospect in 2010 or 2011, I bet the hype around him would have been on par with that of Harper.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
2 years ago

Pulling fly balls at some optimal trajectory isn’t something everyone should try and do, especially those who can hit the ball really really hard.

I’d advise anyone in any endeavor to make their strengths better and not worry about making weaknesses less bad. If his strength is hitting the ball really hard, he should focus on that and let it go in any direction it wants.

Pulling more in 2022-23 meant 11% IFFB. It’s 6% in 2024. B-Ref shows that while he does hit better pulling the ball, he hits much much better than average on opposite field and up the middle hits.

Pull – OPS 1.214, tOPS+ 150, sOPS+ 109 (84 balls)
Middle – OPS .958, tOPS+ 98, sOPS+ 152 (224 balls)
Opp – OPS 1.152, tOPS+ 139, sOPS+ 227 (82 balls)

In 2023 his Pull OPS wasn’t that different, 1.051. But his Middle and Opp were much worse – .752 and .850.

Someone who hits the ball that hard needs to focus on hitting more balls hard, not worrying about launch angle.

Last edited 2 years ago by Ivan_Grushenko
Dominikk85Member since 2020
2 years ago

Vladdy still is tremendously talented but some of his flaws are still there.

His GB rate is actually higher and his pull rate is actually lower than last year, also his average pull side LA is still negative.

There are positives like he is hitting the ball a little harder and chasing a bit less but mostly he has a higher hr/fb (not outrageous though) and babip.

I think vladdy is what he is. Bad years he will hit 260-270 with low to mid 20s homers and good years with some babip and hr/fb luck he will hit 300 with 35 homers.

He still has the talent to do more than that but to hit 45+ homers without a juiced ball or an extreme sandbox he would likely need to change his batted ball profile which is not an easy thing to do.

Last edited 2 years ago by Dominikk85
jillingsMember since 2020
2 years ago

My hot take/bold prediction at the start of the year was Vladdy’s OPS would noylt start with a 7 or an 8. I really didn’t know if it would be in the 600s or 900s. He was bad last year. Per a search literally two clicks from here, Vladdy was the 19th best first baseman last year. This year he is the best.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019🏆 MVP
2 years ago

Somewhat off-topic, but is there any evidence that the ball has been different since the All-Star break? (Yes, it’s only anecdotal evidence I have seen so far, like Vladdy’s 11 HR in 21 games and the Red Sox having the worst pitching and the 2nd best hitting since the ASG)

sadtromboneMember since 2020
2 years ago

Just goes to show that if you (1) don’t strike out and (2) hit the ball extraordinarily hard you can be a Top-20 position player in MLB even if nothing else seems to lend itself to success.

tarvisMember since 2019
2 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I will note that although he certainly “earns” every bit of his bad baserunning rep. and stats, Vladdy is not as terrible as his numbers suggest at 1st. Really. Truly.

Johnnie TMember since 2024
2 years ago

You know, if you just discount 2021 as a completely weird season and ignore it, his progression looks like a good young player having his breakout season at age 25. Which is not unheard of…

Curacao LL
2 years ago

I can’t figure out why they throw Vladdy anything that doesn’t bounce.

Now that they are out of it, they’ve brought up some other hitters who are ‘fun’ (Horwitz, Clement) and might be OK, but all year long, who else was going to beat you on this team? Springer was terrible, Varsho was terrible, Turner couldn’t hit pitches centre-cut. Janssen had a hot month, but until Vladdy heated up (678 OPS in April), the team’s best hitter was… IKF.

If I’m playing the Jays, Vladdy isn’t seeing a pitch all series. If the rest of them beat me, OK, I got beat.

Nickname (required)Member since 2020
2 years ago

This is only happening because this season was the first season I did not keep him in my dynasty league