We Have a CBA Deal, and a 162-Game Season!

And on the 99th day of the owners’ lockout, shortly after the umpteenth deadline set by commissioner Rob Manfred, Major League Baseball and the Major League Baseball Players Association finally reached a deal on a new Collective Bargaining agreement, just in time to preserve a 162-game schedule. Players will report to camps by March 13 (except for those with visa issues); arbitration figures will be exchanged on March 22, with hearings taking place during the season; Opening Day is set for April 7; the regular season will be extended by three days to absorb one of the two previously canceled series, with nine-inning doubleheaders and off days used as a means of absorbing the other; and players will receive full pay and service time. We’re a long, long ways from all being right with the world, or even within the baseball industry, but yes, there will be a 2022 major league season.
BREAKING: Major League Baseball and the MLB Players Association have reached a tentative agreement on a new labor deal, sources tell ESPN. While it still needs to be ratified by both parties, that is expected to be a formality, and when it is:
Baseball is back.
— Jeff Passan (@JeffPassan) March 10, 2022
Two days of close-but-no-cigar negotiations had the two sides drawing closer on core economic issues, but MLB’s insistence upon pairing the creation of an international draft with the ending of the qualifying offer system (aka direct draft pick compensation) set things back on Wednesday. Manfred responded by postponing (but notably not officially cancelling) another week of games, and the league stopped short of delivering a full counterproposal in the late afternoon, instead presenting the union with three options. Via ESPN’s Jesse Rogers:
[1] “Sign the CBA, including eliminating draft pick compensation [the qualifying offer system], and take some time to examine the international draft. If the union won’t implement within a couple years (by ’24?), the league can re-open the CBA.
[2] “Do the entire package without the draft which means without draft pick compensation.”
[3] “Take the original deal. League gets the international draft and draft pick compensation is eliminated.”
The union rejected the premise but made a counterproposal to remove the qualifying offer this year, contingent upon the two sides studying the parameters of the international draft further and setting a deadline to reach agreement or return to the status quo of qualifying offer and no draft. The union proposed November 15 for the date, but mere minutes after my morning update went live, The Athletic’s Evan Drellich reported that the two sides had agreed to a July 25 deadline instead. After a bit more back and forth on the numbers, the proposal was put to a vote, but while the union’s executive subcommittee unanimously voted against the proposal (8–0), the 30 team representatives who round out its executive board voted 26–4 in favor of it, with the Mets, Yankees, Astros and Cardinals dissenting. The owners ratified the agreement shortly after 6 pm ET by a unanimous 30–0 vote, and the lockout officially lifted just after 7 pm ET.
As for the details, not all of them are immediately clear, nor have all of them been fully reported. Here’s what we know so far.
Playoff Structure
The postseason will include 12 teams, with the top two division winners in each league getting byes, and the other eight teams playing best-of-three series (yuck). There will be no ghost-win to give the higher seed an advantage. According to The Athletic’s Jayson Stark, there will be no re-seeding after the first round, so the No. 1 seed will play the winner of the Wild Card series between seeds Nos. 4 and 5, and the No. 2 seed will play the winner of the Nos. 3–6 series.
Alas, all of this means that the single-game Wild Card format is history, and, in an additional blow against Team Entropy, so are Game 163 tiebreakers, with Stark reporting, “All playoff spots will be determined through NFL-type tiebreaker formulas.” To these eyes, the excitement of those win-or-go-home games, and the penalty they imposed upon a team in the next round by requiring the expenditure of a top starting pitcher, worked out well as a way to prioritize winning the division, and to kicking off the postseason with some instant thrills and chills.
Minimum Salary
The major league minimum salary will jump to $700,000 in 2022, up from $570,500, a 22.7% gain; it’s the largest one-year jump ever in the minimum in terms of total dollars, and the largest on a percentage basis since 2003, when it rose by 50% (from $200,000 to $300,000). The minimum will increase by $20,000 per year — the largest intra-CBA annual increases in this millennium — to $780,000 in 2026, for a five-year gain of 36.7%.
| Year | Minimum ($K) | Annual Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | $480.0 | 15.9% |
| 2013 | $490.0 | 2.1% |
| 2014 | $500.0 | 2.0% |
| 2015 | $507.5 | 1.5% |
| 2016 | $507.5 | 0.0% |
| 2017 | $535.0 | 5.4% |
| 2018 | $545.0 | 1.9% |
| 2019 | $555.0 | 1.8% |
| 2020 | $563.5 | 1.5% |
| 2021 | $570.5 | 1.2% |
| 2022 | $700.0 | 22.7% |
| 2023 | $720.0 | 2.9% |
| 2024 | $740.0 | 2.8% |
| 2025 | $760.0 | 2.7% |
| 2026 | $780.0 | 2.6% |
Additionally, via The Score’s Travis Sawchik, players on 40-man rosters will see increases in their Triple-A salaries.
Pre-Arbitration Bonus Pool
The amount of the pool for 2022 is $50 million and will remain flat over the life of the CBA, per The New York Times‘ James Wagner. Via Sawchik, the pool will cover 100 players (roughly the top 20% of pre-arb players). Via Stark, here’s how some of the money will be distributed:
Details on the new pre-arb bonus pool payouts:
MVP/Cy Young winners get $2.5M
MVP/Cy 2nd place gets $1.75M
3rd place gets $1.5M
4th/5th gets $1MROY gets $750,000
ROY 2nd place gets $500All-MLB 1st team gets $1M
All-MLB 2nd team gets $500,000Rest of pool $ is based on WAR
— Jayson Stark (@jaysonst) March 11, 2022
Presumably, he meant $500,000 for second place in Rookie of the Year voting. Stark subsequently noted that a player can receive only one bonus , and that it would be the largest one for which he qualifies.
As for the WAR aspect, the specific metric or blend of metrics on “awards and WAR, the WAR metric or blend that “will be decided upon by a committee at a later date” according to Sawchik. As of earlier this week, 1/30th of the bonus pool amount (now $1.67 million) will count toward each team’s Competitive Balance Tax threshold.
Service Time
The top two Rookie of Year vote-getters in each league will now receive a full year of service time if they were brought up later in the season. A team adding a prospect to its Opening Day roster, meanwhile, will be eligible to receive draft picks if the player finishes in the top three in the Rookie of the Year voting or top five in the MVP or Cy Young voting.
Competitive Balance Tax
The CBT threshold will be $230 million in 2022, up from $210 million last year, a 9.5% jump; in terms of total dollars, it’s the largest jump in the history of the tax. The threshold will increase to $244 million by 2026, a gain of 16.2% over the five-year term. By comparison, it increased by 11.1% over the previous five years of the CBA.
| Year | Threshold ($Mil) | Annual Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | $178 | 0.0% |
| 2013 | $178 | 0.0% |
| 2014 | $189 | 6.2% |
| 2015 | $189 | 0.0% |
| 2016 | $189 | 0.0% |
| 2017 | $195 | 3.2% |
| 2018 | $197 | 1.0% |
| 2019 | $206 | 4.6% |
| 2020 | $208 | 1.0% |
| 2021 | $210 | 1.0% |
| 2022 | $230 | 9.5% |
| 2023 | $233 | 1.3% |
| 2024 | $237 | 1.7% |
| 2025 | $241 | 1.7% |
| 2026 | $244 | 1.2% |
In addition to the surcharges on teams that go at least $20 million over the threshold and those that go at least $40 million over, there will now be a third surcharge for teams that go at least $60 million over — the so-called Cohen Balance Tax aimed at the Mets’ owner, the game’s wealthiest. The exact tax rates are unclear at this writing, but at last report, both sides had proposed the same rates as in the previous CBA, and as Drellich reported, the non-monetary penalties for big-spending teams will remain:
| Amount Payroll Exceeds Base Tax Threshold ($M) | 1st-Time | 2nd-Time | 3rd-Time+ | Draft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-21 | ||||
| <$20M (Base Tax Rate) | 20% | 30% | 50% | — |
| $20M-$40M (Base Tax + 1st Surcharge Rate) | 32% | 42% | 62% | — |
| $40M-$60M (Base Tax + 2nd Surcharge Rate) | 62.5% | 75% | 95% | (1) |
| 2022-26 | ||||
| <$20M (Base Tax Rate) | 20% | 30% | 50% | — |
| $20M-$40M (Base Tax + 1st Surcharge Rate) | 32% | 42% | 62% | — |
| $40M-$60M (Base Tax + 2nd Surcharge Rate) | 62.5% | 75% | 95% | (1) |
| > $60M (Base Tax + 3rd Surcharge Rate) | 80% | 90% | 105% | ? |
Rule Changes
As has been previously reported, the National League will adopt the designated hitter. Another tweak for 2022: Teams can only option a player to the minors five times in a single season.
Additionally, the players have agreed to a 45-day window to implement any new rules starting in 2023, subject to approval by a competition committee consisting of four active players, six league representatives, and one umpire. Via MLB.com’s Mark Feinsand, potential changes include “a pitch clock, base size, defensive positioning and automatic ball/strike zone,” the last of which hadn’t previously been mentioned as a 2023 possibility, though the ABS system will be tested in Triple-A this year.
Rule 4 Draft
The new deal includes a draft lottery involving the top six picks to discourage tanking in addition to the aforementioned draft pick inducements designed to discourage service time manipulation. The 18 non-playoff teams will enter a lottery for the top six picks, with the three worst teams having equal odds for getting the top pick. Via MLB.com’s Jim Callis:
All 18 non-playoff clubs will enter a lottery for the top six picks. The percentage chances of each team getting the No. 1 choice, in reverse order of winning percentages: pic.twitter.com/lzWR3PeOqW
— Jim Callis (@jimcallisMLB) March 11, 2022
The amateur draft itself will be 20 rounds; after the first, teams will pick in reverse order of winning percentage, with playoff clubs picking in reverse order of finish. Within those groups (such as Wild Card Series losers), teams will be sorted by revenue-sharing status and reverse order of winning percentage according to Callis. Additionally, a form of the draft-and-follow system will return.
Rule 4 Draft details from new CBA:
* Top 300 players will be eligible to participate in a pre-draft combine.
* "Kumar Rocker Rule" — the top 300 players who submit to a pre-draft physical must be offered at least 75% of the slot value associated with that selection.— Mark Feinsand (@Feinsand) March 10, 2022
Rule 5 Draft
The Rule 5 draft that was scheduled to take place at this offseason’s Winter Meetings back in December has been canceled.
Other Stuff
Player uniforms will now feature advertising, with patches on jerseys and decals on batting helmets (ugh). As part of the new CBA, there will be a minor adjustment to the revenue sharing program, with the A’s phased back into receiving money; additionally, The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal reported that MLB will use some of the CBT proceeds to reward teams that increase their local revenues. The MLBPA also agreed to drop a grievance filed in 2020 regarding the restart of the sport during the COVID-19 pandemic, though a revenue-sharing grievance from earlier — one filed against the Marlins, Pirates, A’s and Rays back in 2018 — remains.
Also forthcoming is a change to the schedule that will involve more interleague play, at the expense of divisional play:
https://twitter.com/jareddiamond/status/1502062106862137351?s=20&t=_bZ_6YaMVRziHc10aBO-8g
While some people may favor a more balanced schedule, the general problem with reducing divisional play is that it increases the travel demands upon players. If the Yankees are playing their AL East rivals less often, they’re traveling to the West Coast more often, which may have some benefits in terms of the nationwide marketing of star players but also some drawbacks in terms of more time on airplanes and dealing with jet lag.
Within the new CBA, there’s also this:
One interesting part of negotiations: players now have expanded rights to engage in promotional & endorsement activities with sports betting companies. Was very restricted before, now loosened up. Sports betting before was a matter of league policy—now, been decided by both sides
— Evan Drellich (@EvanDrellich) March 10, 2022
The players gain some kind of stake in the sport’s gambling windfall, though the optics of players endorsing betting — for which they themselves would draw lifetime suspensions if they actually partook — aren’t good.
Via WCVB’s Duke Castiglione, under the new CBA, unvaccinated players will not receive pay or service time for games missed in Canada due to federal rules. On January 15, Canada revoked a travel exemption that had allowed unvaccinated professional and amateur athletes to enter the country, a situation that has already come to bear in basketball and other sports.
While this CBA is not the radical reshaping of the landscape that the union hoped for, with earlier free agency and arbitration, it clearly accomplishes one of the players’ main goals by significantly increasing the pay for younger players. It substantially raises the CBT thresholds, with a larger first-year jump and more consistent year-to-year growth relative to the previous two CBAs. It implements measures against tanking and service-time manipulation, though how successful those will be remains to be seen. It offers a route to eliminating draft-pick compensation, though whether that ends up outweighing the impact of an international draft also remains to be seen; likewise as far as whether such a draft helps to clean up a system rife with corruption, coercion, exploitation and PED use. After losing considerable ground in the previous two CBAs, the players weren’t going to regain everything in one fell swoop, but they took steps in the right direction.
“Our union endured the second-longest work stoppage in its history to achieve significant progress in key areas that will improve not just current players’ rights and benefits, but those of generations to come,” MLBPA executive director Tony Clark said via a statement.
On the other side of the ledger, the owners preserved a basic structure that’s working to their advantage, keeping free agency at six years and not expanding the size of the player pool that’s eligible for arbitration. The owners will increase their revenues via a larger postseason field and on-uniform advertising, and will gain a new level for taxing the top-spending teams. Potentially, they will also gain a new means of controlling international spending, though limits on that had already been in place.
The owners’ lockout and the league’s 43-day delay in offering a single proposal to the union galvanized the players and pushed the season to the brink of being shortened for the second time in three years. This has not been a pretty process at all, nor a fun one to cover even from a distance (hats off to those who had to stake out the proceedings), though at least there was less noxious cross-talk and negotiation through the media than in 2020. The fact that, after all of this, we can still look forward to 162 games and some semblance of normalcy is a great relief to everyone who makes their livelihoods off of baseball. While we await the floodgates opening on what promises to be a wild rush of free-agent signings and other transactions, let’s hope that the changes both sides fought for make for a healthier game, and that both sides can shift to focus upon improving the on-field product as well.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Huzzah!
Baseball’s back!!!
Curious to see what fallout of this is— seeing takes that the players still gave up too much, and others that the MLBPA executive team had Cohen’s pockets in mind when they voted against the proposal
Happy birthday to me!
quick question in extra inning games does runner start on 2nd base under the “new” agreement? Really just glad baseball is back!!!!!
No, that’s gone. 7 inning DH gone too.
For a second, I thought you meant “7 inning designated hitter,” which brought all sorts of weird ideas to mind.
Some thoughts:
Clear win for the owners. 20k per year gain on the minimum is peanuts. Prearb pool is also peanuts for the owners. 50M per year split between 30 teams isn’t much, especially when the pool also counts against the CBT. The CBT doesn’t increase much throughout the length of the CBA and there’s an even more punitive 3rd tier as well. Also the additional playoffs is a major coup for the owners. Locks in ~100M in revenue just from the TV deal, not even including tickets, concessions, etc for individual teams. This also will suppress salaries as teams have even more of an excuse not to spend. Anti-tanking measure is a joke. The service time credit for players finishing 1st or 2nd in ROY voting is just going to get manipulated by teams holding rookies down until like 60% of the season is over or something.
Maybe I’m too cynical, but I don’t think this was a win for the players. I think it was a win compared to them getting taken to the cleaners in the last few CBAs, but that’s really not saying much. I’m just glad baseball is back.
The owners were always going to win. They were perfectly willing to wait it out and cancel games whereas the union wasn’t.
Agree the service time rules are gimmicky and still able to be gamed.
Good point. I just hate what the owners are doing to the sport. They’re perfectly willing to sacrifice the long term health of the game if they can make an extra dollar or two.
Has it come out yet what the penalty is for that new CBT threshold?
No, but it’s gotta be like 100% + loss of draft pick or pick being moved even further back. It’s safe to say basically no teams will reach that point besides the Mets. Maybe the Dodgers once in a while.
Actually the Dodgers have exceeded $60 mil over 5 times in the last 10 years (’13-’16 and ’21). And the Yanks likely did a number of times between 2000 and 2010 or so and exceeded +$50M 4 times in ’12 -’16.
On Cots the Mets are projected at $37M over the base for ’22 at this point without further deals so already approaching the 2nd penalty level, with the Dodgers almost $7M over the $230 M base and the Yanks only $7M under. 6 more clubs sit between $180 and $210 million at this point. Still a long way to go to + $60 mil for most all though.
I don’t know that “have even more of an excuse not to spend” is true.
The top-two incentive is huge. Avoiding a three-game crapshoot is a great incentive. So we’re maybe _more_ likely to see premium teams spend big – not just to win the division, but to be even a tier above that. I think this incentivizes teams to aim for 95+ wins, instead of “settling” for 92-95. This should drive some FA and Deadline demand.
Curious as to how “top two” works with the division system. Last year’s Dodgers were 106-win wildcards. Would they now have a round-one bye? Or is “top two” the top two division winners, and 2021 Dodgers go in as the #3 seed?
It seems that the Dodgers would be #4.
It’s been shown that teams have spent less per win in the 10 team playoff era, so I disagree. Teams are already thinking the wild card is good enough because the playoffs are a crapshoot. Most teams operate under the assumption that the playoffs are a crapshoot, so why spend more when it doesn’t demonstrably increase your world series odds? Also with unbalanced schedules it’s gonna be tough to have the best record. The AL East is a gauntlet and the winner might not even get to 95 wins because of the other good teams taking wins away from each other. While the Astros might coast to 98 wins or something because they get to play the Rangers/A’s/Mariners/Angels 80 times per season. Same with the White Sox. I know they said that the schedule will be more balanced in 2023, but more balanced *still* isn’t balanced.
It’s the top two division winners. So the Dodgers would have been the first wildcard team lmao. At least they’d have home field advantage over the other wildcard team.
“We didn’t lose nearly as much as the last time” is not an inspiring battle cry, is it? That’s more or less what happened. Maybe next time.
I am pleasantly surprised. I was expecting the season to start in June.
We got 162 games, so I’m just going to choose to focus on that and not on anything else right now.
Thank goodness now we’re gonna get the craziest free agency frenzy in mlb history I’ve got my popcorn ready. It sucks that the cheap owners got their extra surcharge to try and curtail Steve Cohen’s spending hopefully he just keeps spending anyway.
I think he’s still over the tax line so I can totally imagine some massive 1-year deals.
Right the third surcharge is if you go beyond sixty mil beyond the luxury tax and he’s already nearly forty mil past that.
Spotrac has them at only $264 right now
It’s pretty interesting that the players’ executive committee voted unanimously against it, and was then overruled by the rank and file membership. I wonder what that means for the future tone of MLBPA.
Yeah, I was really struck by that, too. They were MASSIVELY! overruled. Obviously one heckuva disconnect between the EC and the folks they’re supposedly acting on behalf of.
Had the owners been on to that, I suspect they’d gone more hardball. And we’d still have the lockout.
I’m not sure that means much. The MLBPA’s job is to negotiate the best deal it can. It is always going to signal it thinks it can negotiate a better deal. It’s up to the players themselves to tell it when to stop negotiating, and accept the deal. Think of it this way, what does it look like if the MLBPA recommends to take the deal and the players unanimously reject it. That puts the PA in a worse light.
But that’s my uninformed take. I’m just a …
Personally I am impressed James Paxton made it through negotiations uninjured.
I have to wonder if there is some posturing here – if you know the thing is going to pass, vote no and go home feeling righteous, show your bona fides as a player rep, and still get paid
:-)))
(rer Paxton!)
More specifically, six out of eight MLBPA executive subcommittee members had their (former) team vote against the proposal (NYM – Scherzer, Lindor / NYY – Cole, Britton / HOU – Castro / STL – Miller).
Semien (TOR) and Paxton (SEA? BOS?) are the exceptions.
It does makes sense in that the biggest win for MLBPA was on the minimum salary and more players are directly affected by a 20+% salary increase.
The reality is majority of current MLBPA members will not be signing a big FA contract or a big extension in the future, the size of which is a function of luxury tax.
The flipside of that is had it not been for the hardline bargaining of the executive committee, the MLBPA likely would have gotten a less favorable deal.
To state the obvious, MLBPA is a microcosm of our society where you have an union of extremely heterogeneous people with different level of influence and incentives and what is good for the society is far from obvious.
A. CBT threshold goes up to $270M and minimum salary remains at $570k.
B. CBT threshold stays at $210M and minimum salary goes up to $1M.
A would likely lead to a larger sum of player salaries but is it a better deal for the players than B? Hard to say in my opinion.
It is interesting. I think you can chalk it up to the players on the executive committee–who were really in the weeds on this thing–being so angry at the owners’ shenanigans in a way the player reps were not. I don’t really blame them for that. And also, their fury at the owners’ shenanigans did lead to them getting a better deal.
If they had played hardball and rejected this, would they have gotten a better deal? I don’t know for sure one way or the other.
so much for “the players have never been more unified”
The players executive committee had a lot of high-priced talent and 5 (I believe) Scott Boras clients. I think this shows the disconnect between the top earners and the rest of the players, many of whom aren’t making huge money.
Mlb ended the lockout on day 99 in honor of Turk Wendell so I’ll wear a shark toothed necklace at Citi Field.
Human billboards….
Do the owners add desirable things to the game?
Pitch clock.
As a AAA season ticket holder, I agree. Bring on the pitch clock! It has done wonders to speed up the minor league game.
The day is saved! \o/
High marks for the coverage here, usually done in a more thoughtful and analytical way than in a few other venues. And, I’m glad it’s over with.
Immediately upon voting to ratify the new CBA, the players moved quickly to get ready for the three week long ST schedule. First offer of business: every player on your favorite team promptly suffered a Grade 2 hamstring strain.
I’m a Mets fan. This was built into the last two labor agreements, as far as I know.
There is much to happy about as I become an octogenarian tomorrow and every game is precious. I am very pleased that a 162 game is going to be played because the thought of a truncated schedule was a real turn-off to me. In 1972 the games were cancelled and the teams didn’t play an equal number of games. The AL East came down to a year end 3 game series between the Red Sox and the Tigers in Detroit. The Sox held a 1/2 game lead but the Tigers won the first two and finished at 86-70 with the Sox at 85-70. The finances of the game leave me cold. The numbers being tossed around would seem to indicate that everybody is doing just fine. Thankfully I won’t have to watch Max Scherzer, (0 for 68) hit and will, hopefully, get to see Nelson Cruz take a few more hacks. Let the season begin!!!!
Happy Birthday, bosoxforlife. May you be arguing with we Yankees fans for decades to come.
Thanks. One of my best friends, of over 40 years, is just as much a dyed-in-the-wool Yankee fan as I am attached to the Red Sox. Some of my favorite memories have been spent watching the teams play while quaffing a few cold ones at the local Italian-American Club and let me take this opportunity to say that nothing will ever match the last 4 games of the 2004 ALCS.
I resisted the overwhelming urge to thumb you down in honor of your birthday. And offer up the thrilling 1978 Game #163 with a tip of my cap.
Tendentious as always.
Insubordinate and churlish
If you don’t like Jay’s point of view or writing, why read it?
I hope that the provisions in this new agreement on new rules leads to a pitch clock. Of all the ideas out there for improving the pace of the game, this one seems to actually have both a chance of working and be relatively unobtrusive.
Agreed. I’m somewhat concerned that the new committee (which includes players) deciding rule changes may resist the clock. That would be a huge mistake.
Haha I assume that is a typo on the 2nd place ROY money, otherwise that is a hilarious golf clap of a reward compared to the others
I’m happy that baseball is back, but while recognizing that the players weren’t going to gain much—if any—of the ground they lost in the last go-around, the deal still mostly sucks. As a Mets fan specifically, it feels like the so-called “Steve Cohen tax” is about more than merely deterring him from outspending everyone else on player salaries’ writ large, but is also intended as the other teams’ ransom demand, if we want Jacob deGrom to remain in a Mets’ uniform after this season, since he has an opt-out. The Mets gave Scherzer $130mm/3 years ($43.3 AAV), which includes a few extra bucks Cohen said he tacked on for “brand building”. Meanwhile, Jake is four years younger than Ol’ Blue Eye, and is the only truly indispensable player on the roster, as it’s currently constructed. He’s The Franchise II. If he’s healthy and he picks up where he left off last season, is it crazy to think he could command something like $200mm/4? $230mm/5? $180mm/3? The owners likely calibrated the additional CBT threshold and its associated penalties for maximum prophylactic efficacy against Uncle Steve’s bankroll, and I’m really not sure if the Mets can resign Jake without blowing right through it, given all of their new signings and acquisitions to come, their impending FAs who will need to be re-signed or replaced (Nimmo, plus the entire back end of the bullpen), all the Arb-2 guys (most notably Alonso) who will be due significant raises, not to mention that huge, high-priced albatross named Steroids McGee—I mean, Robinson Sorry But I Canó Stop Taking PEDs They R Soooo Yummy.
You’re being paranoid. They aren’t worried about the Mets winning, since they obviously don’t care nearly so much about winning as they do about profits.
There once was a baseball season,
That was compromised for no reason.
The owners had power, they wanted to keep it,
The players got tired of pleadin’.
Peanuts were spilled!
The owners scrambled!
The players wailed,
But they also wanted to play ball.
The owners weren’t happy.
They went to bed salty.
They themselves were at odds,
They just held all the cards,
Their spirits remained quite paltry.
Perhaps they will share with the plebes
Who play in the minor leagues,
Can the nacho vendor have some cheese?
Not billions, just hundreds,
For they have not plundered
The work of the rest for their fees.
I applaud the poem, I am disgruntled about the inconsistent rhyme scheme, and now I want nachos, beer and baseball.
I wrote it last night in… let’s just call it a haze. Now I am disgruntled about the rhyme scheme too
Hey it worked for TLC with “Waterfalls”! (Seriously the chorus hurts my ears…RHYME, LADIES, RHYME!)
The other one that gets me is the Common song “The Light.”
There are times. when you’ll need someone.
I will be by your side.
There is a light that shines,
Special for you and me.
Not “you and I” – that would rhyme too well with “side” and “shines”
I disagree about the advertising patches. European football (soccer) deals with the lack of commercial breaks by selling ads on the front of their jerseys. I prefer it to 2-minute-long ad breaks every half-inning. Along those lines, I prefer the half-screen-during-an-AB ads to full breaks.
Reduce those ad breaks between innings to 1 minute instead of 2 and you shave almost 10 minutes off the time of every game.
Only national games have 2 minute breaks, local games have had 90 second breaks for several years now. It does make a nice difference.
Except they definitely will not be shortening the commercial breaks.
They just did a few years ago.
Agree w/ Mr. Fan Club – if it was a trade-off between patches and shortening breaks I think we would embrace that wholeheartedly. But they will still have interminable breaks PLUS the local muffler shop on the helmet.
My only question is about the qualifying offer bit. Is the Intl. draft tied to the entire QO system or just the team that the player leaves receiving picks. Cause earlier in the negotiations I had seen the league was willing to give up teams losing picks for signing a player who had rejected the QO, I have to imagine they never fully agreed to that and it’s the whole system otherwise Intl. draft ain’t worth giving up.
My takeaways:
1. Advertisement patches on jerseys sucks
2. Will be compelling to see how teams change their handling of prospects when they can get rewarded with draft picks if player gets enough award votes
3. Play ball! So glad they reached a deal
If I could add an animated gif it’d be the little dancing banana one. What a nice surprise this was.
Let me try.
“though the optics of players endorsing betting — for which they themselves would draw lifetime suspensions if they actually partook — aren’t good.”
I really don’t think most fans care AT ALL about this.
I care, and I think a lot of others do, too. I don’t care at all about uniform patches, which I imagine will get a lot of discussion, but I do care about the integrity of the game, even if I don’t trust those in charge to actually maintain it
Now that MLB is actively encouraging player involvement in gambling, they need to put Pete in the HOF.
Yes! Now FG can return to business as usual…like criticizing front offices for paying veteran free agents too much money…
You seem fun!
Thank you all for your continued, fantastic coverage during this time. We know it’s been hard for everyone at this site, especially following the events of the last 2 years. We’re all looking forward to the top-notch Fangraphs “normal”.
It’s small potatoes, I guess, but integrating WAR/media-input into the CBA is a terrible, terrible idea (and something the NBA regrets in its own, deeply-flawed version)
An international draft would be so terrible for latin american baseball
Yeah, the draft is very unfair for domestic players, and it’s hard to imagine any international draft not being even worse.
And as I previously predicted, the union gave up its insincere $500,000,000 unfair labor practice grievance over the fact that MLB only played 60 games in the middle of a raging pandemic in 2020.
When asked by the press if they did so, Tony Clark didn’t have the guts to admit giving it up. He dodged answering the question.
Bruce Meyer is a real piece of work. If you hate Manfred’s personality, you will really enjoy Meyer when he is running the union next negotiations. Clark will be fired shortly. I am setting the over/under as one year from today (most likely in the off season).
I think the balanced schedule thing should be a much bigger deal and is kinda getting lost in everything else. I love it. I live in Cincinnati. The best player in baseball over the last decade, Mike Trout has played five games here in his entire career. Shohei Ohtani made two pinch hit plate appearances when the Angels were in town in 2019. That’s all we Cincinnati fans have been able to see of two of the most exciting players in the game. The Astros, one of the most successful AL teams of the last several years, has played here once in the last decade. The Yankees have played one two-game series here since 2011.
The way interleague play was set up before, we pretty much had one shot to see a superstar player in their prime if they happened to play in a division like the AL West or AL East. Now we will have a chance to go to the ballpark to see players like Trout, Ohtani, Guerrero, Franco, Bogaerts, etc. every other year. That’s pretty cool!
As a Jays fan, I will forgo a few dates with the Orioles in return for clearing out some Yankees, Red Sox, and Rays games…to be replaced by a random smattering of…other stuff! Marlins and Cubs and Dodgers and Rockies and Mets and Pirates! I’m in.
What does it mean for when teams bring up minor leaguers and service time? Outside of the rookie of the year voting implications.