What on Earth Happened With Jake Arrieta?
Tuesday was a good day for the Cubs. Most of them are good days for the Cubs, but on Tuesday, they earned their first win of 2017, edging out the Cardinals 2-1. Jason Heyward and Javier Baez drove in the runs, but the star was Jake Arrieta, who spun six innings with just an unearned run going against him. He piled up six whiffs, and it was a good way for him to get things going. If the Cubs have any potential vulnerability, it has to do with rotation depth. As long as Arrieta and the other guys are clicking, the Cubs are at least as good as anyone else.
On TV, Arrieta looked effective. In the box score, Arrieta looks effective. But what was the deal with his fastball? This is an open question. I don’t have an answer. I just have evidence that makes me think thoughts.
Here is one Jake Arrieta fastball.
91 miles per hour. Harder than I can throw! Here is another Jake Arrieta fastball.
90 miles per hour. Still harder than I can throw! But I’m no bar for a major-league pitcher. Arrieta should be compared against himself. That’s where the potential problem lies.
Things are kind of foggy right now. Velocity readings are being taken differently, and that’s causing some issues, since we’d all like to make sure we’re comparing apples to apples. The system that was spitting out 2016 velocities has been replaced by a different system, which tracks velocity as best as it can right out of the hand. As a consequence, we’ve seen a good number of pitchers in the very early going who appear to be throwing harder than they used to. That needs to be adjusted for. Just most generally, though, we don’t know what to make of 2017 velocities yet. We must all proceed with a certain amount of caution, if we’re going to dive into the numbers.
Just, let me show you a big table of numbers. This is a table of average fastball velocities. These are marks for all the starters so far in 2017, and you also see where they were in 2016. Jake Arrieta stands out, and not in a way anyone would like to.
| Pitcher | 2016 FA | 2017 FA | Change | Pitcher | 2016 FA | 2017 FA | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Estrada | 88.1 | 90.2 | 2.1 | Jon Gray | 95.1 | 95.7 | 0.6 |
| Madison Bumgarner | 90.9 | 93.0 | 2.1 | Ricky Nolasco | 90.4 | 90.9 | 0.5 |
| Kendall Graveman | 92.7 | 94.7 | 2.0 | Dallas Keuchel | 88.6 | 89.1 | 0.5 |
| Patrick Corbin | 91.4 | 93.2 | 1.8 | Jeremy Hellickson | 90.1 | 90.5 | 0.4 |
| Gerrit Cole | 95.2 | 96.9 | 1.7 | Clayton Richard | 90.4 | 90.7 | 0.3 |
| Adam Wainwright | 90.3 | 91.9 | 1.6 | Carlos Martinez | 95.6 | 95.7 | 0.1 |
| Tyler Anderson | 90.9 | 92.4 | 1.5 | Lance McCullers | 93.9 | 93.9 | 0.0 |
| CC Sabathia | 90.0 | 91.5 | 1.5 | Carlos Carrasco | 93.8 | 93.8 | 0.0 |
| Martin Perez | 92.7 | 94.1 | 1.4 | Jose Quintana | 92.1 | 92.1 | 0.0 |
| Scott Feldman | 89.2 | 90.6 | 1.4 | Chris Archer | 94.3 | 94.2 | -0.1 |
| Kenta Maeda | 90.0 | 91.3 | 1.3 | Zack Greinke | 91.3 | 91.2 | -0.1 |
| Yu Darvish | 93.3 | 94.4 | 1.1 | Ervin Santana | 92.7 | 92.6 | -0.1 |
| Stephen Strasburg | 94.9 | 96.0 | 1.1 | Clayton Kershaw | 93.1 | 92.8 | -0.3 |
| Edinson Volquez | 93.2 | 94.2 | 1.0 | Noah Syndergaard | 97.9 | 97.6 | -0.3 |
| Masahiro Tanaka | 90.6 | 91.6 | 1.0 | Julio Teheran | 90.9 | 90.5 | -0.4 |
| Sean Manaea | 92.3 | 93.2 | 0.9 | Rick Porcello | 90.2 | 89.7 | -0.5 |
| Felix Hernandez | 90.5 | 91.4 | 0.9 | Corey Kluber | 92.5 | 91.8 | -0.7 |
| Johnny Cueto | 91.5 | 92.3 | 0.8 | Junior Guerra | 93.1 | 92.2 | -0.9 |
| Matt Shoemaker | 91.5 | 92.3 | 0.8 | Jon Lester | 92.1 | 91.1 | -1.0 |
| Jhoulys Chacin | 90.5 | 91.3 | 0.8 | Danny Duffy | 94.5 | 93.1 | -1.4 |
| Zach Davies | 89.3 | 90.1 | 0.8 | Jake Odorizzi | 91.6 | 90.0 | -1.6 |
| Kevin Gausman | 94.7 | 95.4 | 0.7 | Hisashi Iwakuma | 87.8 | 86.1 | -1.7 |
| Justin Verlander | 93.5 | 94.2 | 0.7 | Jake Arrieta | 93.7 | 91.1 | -2.6 |
The most important first point: I don’t know what to make of this yet. And, for all these guys, we’re talking about literally one 2017 baseball game. The present situation is complicated. But if there’s a normal error, it’s that 2017 velocities are a little too high. This group, on average, is throwing harder by 0.4mph. The median is +0.7mph. That would seem to reflect the different way velocity is being recorded. Arrieta is way off. This says he’s down 2.6 ticks. Compared to the average trend, he’s down more like 3.0 ticks. It’s too early for any measure of panic, but it’s not too early to wonder what’s happening.
Looking at the Tuesday Gameday window, the tracking system seems to have broken for a short amount of time. That’s suspicious! Arrieta, therefore, has some missing pitches. So does counterpart Adam Wainwright. That’s abnormal, so it can’t be ignored. On the other hand, look at the table — Wainwright is close to the top, at +1.6mph. In the same game where Arrieta’s reported velocities were down, Wainwright’s were up. And just for the record, this isn’t only about the fastballs. Fastballs just work as a proxy. All the pitch-type velocities changed.
Arrieta last night had 58 pitches tracked, according to Baseball Savant. The fastest was recorded at 92.6, and there were three pitches that cleared 92.0. Compare that to Arrieta’s first start from 2016, when he had 89 pitches tracked. The fastest was recorded at 96.0, and there were 51 pitches that cleared 92.0. I don’t know how many more ways to show you something looks weird. I can’t explain it, but I’d like an explanation.
Losing velocity isn’t good. We just went over this the other day, in discussing Zack Greinke. It doesn’t mean a pitcher is toast, but it reduces the margin of error, and it can certainly hint at something being mechanically or structurally wrong. And if you choose to dig into Arrieta’s Tuesday start a little deeper, you can see he threw fewer than half his first pitches for strikes. He threw barely 60% of his pitches for strikes, overall. Jake Arrieta ran into real command issues over the course of 2016, which somewhat lowered his stock. This is his contract season, and he’s looking to make a big splash.
I’d love to have an answer here. I’d like nothing more than to be able to tell you everything’s okay, or everything isn’t. In reality, we’ve had one start, and velocity readings have gotten all weird, and during this very Arrieta appearance, the tracking system temporarily stopped tracking things. I wouldn’t yet advise having any sort of strong reaction. Just, you should have *a* reaction. One game in, we’ve got some Jake Arrieta-related questions, which means one could question how strong the Cubs really are. Don’t take things too far, but at least be aware of the issue. If it’s real, it could be significant.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.
I know during the broadcast the Len Kasper mentioned they were having some issues with velocity readouts in the stadium. Could be something or it could just be Arrieta throwing softer.
I hope he’s fine, but compared to what Wainwright was throwing…. I don’t know, doesn’t look promising.
Hey idiot read the whole article before commenting.
Great story. Compelling and Rich.
My bad everyone. I was responding to myself as the idiot for not reading the article.
Len commented that during an early, multi-inning stretch in which no velocities were being recorded at all.
ruh roh
That’s a quote-unquote from Scooby-Doo, I believe.
Arrieta’s velocity would’ve been perfectly fine, if it weren’t for you meddling kids.
Do you have any Spring Training velo data for Arrieta?
Edit: Just one game, he was at 92.48 average on his fastball in that game, not sure if that is from PFX or Trackman. About 1mph down from last year.
I don’t know if it’s just because I’m not usually blessed with the wonderful St. Louis camera angle, but he looked like he was throwing across his body even more than he typically has. Wonder if there was anything about his horizontal release point that was different?
I thought the same thing. He seemed to be stepping even further off to the right than usual.
In addition, his curveball seemed to be an entirely different pitch. It’s normally very 12-6, but it was extremely slurvey last night. In fact, it was at times almost indistinguishable from his slider aside from the velocity difference. Also probably accentuated by the straight-on camera angle, but definitely different.
So I looked on Brooks and it was the furthest he’s released toward the third-base side in his career. Sinker was at -3.73 feet on Tuesday while it was more like -3 to -3.3 in the past two years. Same story for his slider/cutter. If that’s the case then it’s probably not injury-related, but that he’s having to throw crossways enough that it’s sapping the velocity toward homeplate a bit.
I can’t find the video but Arrieta mentioned this in his postgame interview as something that isn’t a big deal but he has to focus on.
The article in the link below has gifs of his old deliveries. It definitely looks like he is stepping out and throwing across his body way more.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/jake-arrietas-mechanics-learning-from-the-past/
Anybody else feel his delivery is just painful to watch? Looks stressful on his shoulder.
Definitely throws across his body which is a recipe for disaster.
Before reading this article I wouldn’t have thought anything was wrong because the Cards’ offense look completely hapless again him. Not that it’s a great offense or anything, but it’s probably league average. Arrieta looked unhittable even if he looked a little wild throughout, but I wasn’t paying much attention to velo readings.
No question something was odd with the radar gun last night. (It’s funny, I was sitting there watching and betting there would be a FanGraphs article about it!) At first there was no data, and then there was just the mph next to the game-score graphic, and then the stupid PitchTrax (or whatever CSN’s version is called) box was up. Arrieta’s numbers were concerning, no question, but it didn’t seem like he was throwing that slowly (I know that’s hard to judge by eye on TV, but still). And then Brett Cecil was mostly throwing in the upper 80s and barely over 90 on his heater (Baseball Savant shows only one Cecil FB above 91 mph last night while he averaged over 92 last season and regularly was in the 93-94 mph range.) Cecil also seemed to be throwing faster to me than the gun was indicating. So. . . I’m a Cubs fan and certainly am biased in hoping that this is nothing about Arrieta, and I don’t doubt that he’d maybe down 1 mph from last season based on spring training, but I’m very skeptical we should look at the data from last night’s game given how wonky things were with the gun.
In Dave Cameron’s chat earlier today he mentioned that he thought it was at least possible that Arrieta and Lester were instructed to take it easy early this season to save their arms.
Just because we won last year I haven’t forgotten how to be a Cubs fan: I’m just going to go ahead and take that as absolute fact.
This makes a lot of sense. I’d find it the most believable explanations, myself. I wouldn’t be surprised if they also kept their SP’s within a reasonable pitch count as well for the same reason.
Okham’s Razor would point to “technical difficulties in Busch Stadium”. More interesting is that Arrieta threw more than 23% curveballs instead of last year’s 12%.
The radar gun wasn’t working for a lot of Arrieta’s most effective innings; pitch locations were also not present or wildly off far more than usual.
ESPN was also having trouble with K-Zone the first game of the series.
Without paying attention to every gun reading, I was very impressed with Arrieta’s command of the curveball. He was getting plenty of called strikes. I saw nothing to be worried about.
The linked article indicates that trackman measures directly out of the hand vs a constant distance. It’s quite possible that certain release points aren’t being tracked as well as others. Maybe guys with a 3/4 slot are getting a better read than an over-the-top guy. You’d have to compare Arrieta to Arrieta now due to trackman.
This is my thought as well. We don’t know that the changes will impact pitchers equally. But perhaps that’s just the Cubs fan in me wishcasting.
It really looks like he is ‘aiming’ or not following through on his pitches well, which could be solely mechanical or could suggest a back issue, or neither of course.
Syndergaard throwing puss. I knew my Jays were right to trade him.
I think he’s just getting old, like me. Hey you kids get off my lawn!
I’m not sure how I feel about the new method of velocity calculation. Pitch f/x has been several years collecting data, and by changing the method of data collection, they will potentially skew the results. I’m watching the Braves game and the commentators are fascinated with how Bartolo Colon keeps hitting 92, but I doubt a 43-year old gained a tick over the off-season… Color me skeptical
Same thing happened to Strasburg last year. It was nothing.
According to Brooks, Strasburg’s velocity opening day 2016 was no different from his 2015 averages. King Felix is an example of a guy who had an opening day velocity drop which never recovered and was associated with severe performance drop and injury.
So you’re saying the Orioles were right to get rid of him? I always knew he wasn’t any good. Even when he was winning a Cy Young, I knew he wasn’t any good.
If it really is an issue with the way the new system picks up velocity, we should see this with other pitchers. I guess I’m skeptical of the drop because of the results. The proof of the pudding is in the tasting – his results were good. And while pitchers can still be good with a velocity drop, there’s usually a transition period where they get hit around. I guess we’ll see.