Which Teams Are Best Equipped for the Playoffs?

Which characteristics cause a team to either excel or struggle in the postseason? It’s a long-standing debate, and most baseball fans have a preferred theory. Some think it’s having an ace. Others think good contact hitting, or a team’s momentum, is what pushes a club over the top. Some people — the ones most likely to get annoyed when they read my work — think that clutch performances or having veterans with playoff experience on the roster is what causes a club to shine in October. Sadly, the best answer is rather boring: What makes a team play well in the postseason is simply being the better team overall. In 2022, I examined 63 team characteristics throughout baseball history to see if any of them presaged clubs’ fall fates. Outside of leaning more heavily on home runs to score — top pitchers who struggle in the playoffs are far more likely to be felled by homers than issuing walks or failing to strike hitters out — and a barely significant tendency for younger teams to overperform, there just wasn’t much there, there.
But that’s not to say that playoff baseball is identical to regular season baseball. After all, the former is a sprint while the latter is a marathon, and the challenges in each scenario are different. When I ran the numbers for the aforementioned article, the focus was on how the playoff teams played, rather than who played. I specially used a playoff model that estimated team quality as being different in the regular season due to roster construction considerations. Teams are better able to leverage their front-end talent over a few crucial weeks than a six-month period. The qualities of a team’s fifth starter (not to mention their sixth, seventh and eighth) are less crucial to their success come October, and the key bats in the lineup (if healthy) are almost always going to be playing, thanks to the additional days off that clubs get in the postseason. As the 2019 Washington Nationals demonstrated, you can even paper over half your bullpen being a train wreck.
So which teams are best equipped for the playoffs this year? To estimate that, I projected every team in baseball twice. First, I projected their current rosters based on normal patterns of usage. Then I projected every team again, only this time with a usage pattern that reflects the differences in playoff baseball, with a higher proportion of the playing time given to a team’s best healthy players, especially its starting pitchers.
There are 15 teams, exactly half of baseball, with some plausible hope of making the playoffs (I’m omitting the Red Sox, who are currently teetering on the edge of mathematical oblivion). If we played an entire season again from this point, in violation of the calendar and the MLBPA’s likely objection to doubling everyone’s workload, ZiPS estimates the current roster strength of the 15 playoff-relevant teams as follows:
| Team | Current |
|---|---|
| Los Angeles Dodgers | .560 |
| New York Yankees | .554 |
| Baltimore Orioles | .550 |
| Houston Astros | .550 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | .549 |
| Seattle Mariners | .545 |
| San Diego Padres | .545 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | .544 |
| Minnesota Twins | .544 |
| Cleveland Guardians | .542 |
| Atlanta Braves | .519 |
| Milwaukee | .534 |
| New York Mets | .523 |
| Detroit Tigers | .521 |
| Kansas City Royals | .507 |
Every roster has some imperfection, so there’s a fairly small spread between the top and the bottom. Naturally, there are a lot of differences from the preseason, when ZiPS saw the Braves as the best team in baseball prior to their basketful of injuries, and had the Tigers and Royals winning 70-something games. Next, we’ll add in the estimated postseason strength, a mix of three-game, five-game, and seven-game series constructions, and compare it to the regular season projections:
| Team | Current | Postseason | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Dodgers | .560 | .586 | .026 |
| New York Yankees | .554 | .576 | .021 |
| Atlanta Braves | .519 | .534 | .015 |
| Baltimore Orioles | .550 | .565 | .015 |
| Houston Astros | .550 | .561 | .011 |
| Detroit Tigers | .521 | .529 | .008 |
| Seattle Mariners | .545 | .549 | .004 |
| Philadelphia Phillies | .549 | .549 | .000 |
| Milwaukee Brewers | .534 | .533 | -.001 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | .544 | .542 | -.002 |
| New York Mets | .523 | .516 | -.007 |
| San Diego Padres | .545 | .537 | -.007 |
| Minnesota Twins | .544 | .527 | -.017 |
| Cleveland Guardians | .542 | .516 | -.026 |
| Kansas City Royals | .507 | .475 | -.031 |
Ranking by relative improvement, the Dodgers come out on top in the projections. While the team has been known for its depth, a boon during the regular season, injuries have sapped the rotation to such a degree that they’re no longer really equipped for a long run at the moment. But facing a maximum of 19 games — game-ending triple plays aside, the Dodgers are still very likely to get a first-round bye — they may be able to hold the pitching together, which would give a lineup with Shohei Ohtani, Mookie Betts, and Freddie Freeman the best chance to avoid having to win a bunch of 10-9 contests.
The Yankees also get a big boost in the postseason format thanks to the team’s power and its ability to slot two MVP candidates in Aaron Judge and Juan Soto into the lineup. ZiPS is quite down on the back of the Yankees’ bullpen, but this estimate considers that less of an issue.
Next up is the Braves, mainly because October gives them the opportunity to mostly start Chris Sale, Max Fried, and Charlie Morton, with less emphasis on Spencer Schwellenbach or having to figure out who their fifth starter is. For all the team’s struggles this season, Atlanta still currently ranks fifth in baseball in runs scored [or homers as the word goes -DS], and as mentioned above, home run reliance does help when matched up against other teams’ aces. These projections reflect that Austin Riley will not be returning this year.
The Orioles would have ranked more highly here, but the questions surrounding Grayson Rodriguez‘s health has lowered their chances of avoiding Dean Kremer or Albert Suárez having to face off against superior opposing pitchers (ZiPS remains skeptical of Suárez as a starter). Félix Bautista’s absence is a big deal here. Things don’t feel great in Baltimore right now, with the team treading water since the All-Star break and falling well behind the Yankees in September, but there’s also no reason to think that momentum plays a significant role in postseason play.
The Astros get to rely on their core offensive talent — I’m assuming Yordan Alvarez’s sprained right knee is a short-term issue — and they get a lot of Framber Valdez, who ZiPS is a big fan of. The Tigers are actually projected as the best AL Central team when it comes to the postseason by virtue of having Tarik Skubal, who ZiPS thinks is currently the best starter in baseball (he also has the top WAR projection of 2025, passing Logan Webb). ZiPS isn’t keen on Detroit’s bullpen as a whole, but when it projects them to mostly rely on Jason Foley, Tyler Holton, and Will Vest, those numbers get a lot sunnier.
On the downside, ZiPS was a fan of the Guardians coming into the season because of what it saw as deep, stable depth. But that’s less of an asset in October, and the computer basically thinks that Cleveland will have the inferior starting pitcher in the vast majority of the team’s matchups. ZiPS is more confident about Cole Ragans than any Guardians starter, but rates Kansas City’s offense as relatively weak outside of Bobby Witt Jr. and sees the Royals as having the weakest bullpen of any of the 15 teams.
Is it possible that the Yankees will get bounced in the Division Series while the Royals steamroll their opponents? Absolutely! And that’s the fun of postseason play — in the end, it’s the players who get the final word on who gets doused in champagne and cheap beer, not the computers.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
Which person is well equipped to be very cool? The answer is Dan.
The Guardians bullpen is the strength of the roster. Same as it was in 2016. Too many hurt pitchers, not enough reinforcements. The only real hope is that Cobb comes back to strengthen the rotation, but even then. The offense is a lot weaker than that team’s as well, though they do have an identical identical wRC+.
I love my Guards, but they have an uphill battle in almost every possible matchup. Five-and-dive is the name of the game.
Why five?
They can roll with a ten arm bullpen and the way they’ve been surfacing single inning pitchers lately, they might run with a once through the order three man rotation.
(And they’ve threatening to put MacKenzie in the ‘pen.)
Maybe they make the playoffs all bullpen games. 🤔
Because it’s not sustainable in the crunch time of the playoffs, after an already long season. The 2016 club had a deep bullpen too, but even with 5-and-dive tactics in most games, they ran out of gas by the end. Going even deeper into that would be a mistake. And in September they had the monster bullpens that the old callup rules allowed for.
The 2016 bullpen wasn’t that deep. In the playoffs it was mostly Otero (who Francona didn’t really trust much), Shaw, Miller, and Allen. The latter two burnt out because Francona had them both pitch 1+ inning per appearance in every single series.
Even with that, the team nearly won the WS even though none of the experts thought they could get past either the Red Sox or the Blue Jays. Instead they went 7-1 against those two teams while relying on their bullpen. So it seems like the strategy can work.
Granted that team had Kluber and this team doesn’t. But I’d argue that this team has a much deeper bulloen though I pray that Sandlin never pitches in a key moment.
There were more to the bullpen than that, though Francona did overuse Shaw, Miller, and Allen in the WS. But Clevinger, McAllister both were key in the losses of that series. That’s my direct point. They couldn’t use their best options carte blanche, had to dig into their depth, and failed when they did so. Danny Salazar had two appearances, and that was a guy who was expected to be out for the year pulling a hail mary. Jeff Manship is Nick Sandlin, 2016 edition.
Yes, the 2024 Guardians have a great bullpen. But outside of the core four of Herrin, Smith, Gaddis, and Clase, what do they have? Eli Morgan, and then what? Guys with less than 15 innings of MLB experience? Anthony Gose? Nick Sandlin? Pedro Avila? Sounds like the same situation to me.
So first I would argue that this year’s “Core 4” is stronger than 2016’s. Just one example. This year’s Core 4 has given up a grand total of 9 home runs. The 2016 version gave up 26.
Morgan has also been solid this year. There will likely be a starter in the pen for at least the first series (probably Williams or Lively). Then there are the two newcomers – Walters and Sabrowski who have combined for 16 scoreless innings so far. Granted we don’t know if they’ll make the playoff roster but I would assume at least one of them will.
Again though, at least in the Division series, they don’t need much depth. Not with a day off between every game.
BTW, while the bullpen has been solid all year, they’ve been amazing in September. In 85.3 innings, they have a 1.27 ERA.
I generally agree. I don’t think Dan’s analysis works well for a team like the Guardians. If I understand correctly, he overweighted starting pitching. But a team like the Guardians are likely to overuse their bullpen. Particularly in the first round where there’s a day off in-between every game
That’s not to say the Guardians don’t have their weaknesses. But the starters really only need to give them 4-5 innings. Then the bullpen can come in and shut teams down. Don’t remember where I saw it but the Guardians lead the majors in come from behind wins. They’re also undefeated when leading after 6 innings (or maybe it’s 7, I can’t remember).
Yep. The only misgiving that I have is that it’s such a fine line to walk. Sure, the Guardians could try and roll with Cade Smith/Hunter Gaddis/Tim Herrin/Emmanuel Clase for every game, but it doesn’t tend to work out that way in practice. The 2016 Indians and the 2014 Royals both ran out of gas in the end, and the 2015 Royals got helped out by bad defense by the Mets in their WS matchup, and they had a legit ace in the tail end of Cueto’s prime, as did the 2016 Indians with prime Kluber. This squad doesn’t have an ace pitcher with Bieber on the shelf.
It’s also a matter of actually getting the lead to hold it, and that’s the one area where there isn’t really a way to just finagle it, unlike walking a tightrope on the pitching side. And while those Royals squads had the extra speed to take bases any time they needed one, the Guardians aren’t quite there. They’re good, 5th in the league this year in stolen bases, but the gap between them and 4th place Tampa Bay is roughly the same as the gap between the Guardians and 15th place Arizona. The larger bases make the raw numbers pop the past couple season, but it’s not an intrinsic advantage.
The best hope, imo, is that the rotation can go 4-deep, with Bibee, Boyd, Cobb, and some combination of Lively and Cantillo handling the starts, and that the bullpen can come in the last four or so innings and clean up where they can.
I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said. The offense definitely isn’t as good as 2016. And there’s no ace. Though barring any drone injuries, they’ll hopefully be able to get a bit more out of their starters overall. And I do think the bullpen is better this year. The big unknown is Kwan. Will he back and will he be able to provide anything?
Just noticed: Cleveland has the lowest runs allowed this side of Atlanta. The bullpen has really propped up the erratic rotation.
They just did a dry run for what a Cleveland bullpen game might look like in oct.
6 perfect innings. Zero earned runs.
Also, Kwan is back: 2 for 4 with a Hr in his first AB.
They have so many rookies, small sample players, and rely so heavily on match-ups they’re too unpredictable compared to veteran teams.
Oh, and Ramirez needs 2 Hrs in the last three games against Houston.
40-40 isn’t looking good.
Dandy Dan showing his bias against the Royals again, calling their offense weak just because they’re averaging half a run per game in September! Garrett Hampson will prove you wrong!
How does the strength of roster relate to WS odds in the projected standings?
I figured the strongest teams would correlate to the best odds but that doesn’t seem to be the case? Does it factor in Wild Card vs bye potential?
I know my Birds have struggled since the ASB, but Urias, Westburg, Mountcastle are all back. And Kremer ain’t no slack on the mound either, giving them a solid top 3 of the rotation. I think the layoff after the division win last year hurt us…won’t happen this year. I sense a repeat of the Rangers’ run last year.
From a purely emotional place, the vibes do feel good all of the sudden for Baltimore. It’s completely the opposite of the way this article lays everything out, but since the last game of the Giants series, it feels like a corner was turned. The series against the Tigers was dropped on a robbed HR and an extra inning loss. Having a not lobsided Lefty lineup with the guys you mentioned, and even having Kjerstad back feels huge.
I don’t like your bullpen.
The absence of Rodriguez, Bradish and Bautista make the pitching shaky. Rutschman has to come back to life.
They still have a better roster than Detroit but KC would give them trouble
You can get by with 4 relievers in the post season IF you have 4 starters. If you need to throw a bullpen game in there, then you’re going to need a lot more and a little luck.
I don’t know why teams don’t carry a pinch runner in the playoffs. There are a lot of guys who just aren’t going to play. The last 2 or 3 guys in the bullpen, the fifth starter, the backup catcher, and the worst of the three bench position players are all going to be riding the bench and not contributing much, especially with the universal DH and the three batter rule. Those guys will be used mostly as pinch runner/defensive replacements if there isn’t a true platoon. So if they are only going to be used that way, it doesn’t matter if they can’t hit like it would over 162 games.
Just as a real example, you can look at the Phillies. You have to have Castellanos in the starting lineup, but if he draws a walk in the 8th inning of a close game, would you rather replace him with Austin Hays, or Johan Rojas? Hays bat has been easily playable as a fourth OF this year and his glove and legs are a little less bad than Castellanos, but he isn’t going to get a plate appearance. Rojas can really make a difference on the bases and in the field and it doesn’t matter that he hasn’t hit because he isn’t going to.
Billy Hamilton is the prototypical guy I am thinking about. Hard to carry that bat over a whole season, but being able to sub him in for a lumbering corner OF late in a close game as a runner or defensive replacement could net you a run or two and that’s huge in a short series.
There’s even a functional example of exactly that, in the 2014 and 2015 Royals, with Terrence Gore. It’s a proven strategy that can absolutely work in the right contexts. The issue is that for certain positions (catcher, most specifically), you absolutely need to also carry their backup just so you can pinch-run for them without sacrificing your flexibility if the pinch running opportunity doesn’t work for whatever reason.
You also carry the fifth starter, in case someone gets injured early in a game or you otherwise need a bulk reliever, its an effective certainty that your fifth starter is better than your best multiinning reliever, otherwise the multiinning reliever would BE the fifth starter.
Not necessarily; a command-over-stuff 5th starter would not be your best multi-inning option if you have a guy who, say, has better stuff but can’t necessarily go more than one time through the order because of a lack of variation or command. But that’s still a fair point.
The problem is that the pinch runner has to be that much faster (or, more specifically, that much better of a basesunner) than the faster guy on your bench already.
Take the Yankees – they could carry Duke Ellis, but is he that much of an upgrade on the bases over Jon Berti, Oswaldo Cabrera or Trent Grisham that it’s worth it to carry him even though he won’t do anything else? I don’t know. Crazy things happen in baseball, and it’s tough to roster someone who can only do one thing well.
This is true for the Yankees as well. John Berti has pinch run for Stanton and Rizzo and positively impacted some games.
No way the Braves slot Morton head of Schwellenbach in a playoff rotation.
Right, It was Schwellenbach and not Morton who got the call to start against the Mets in the biggest series of the year.
Yeah zips is a huge non-believer in Schwellenbach for some reason. No idea why, all his peripherals are great. Maybe short track record? But other projection systems come around on him. But Schwelly is the easy choice. I’d start him every time over Morton without any hesitation.
It’s got to be the track record because the advanced metrics and the eye say the guy is dominant.
On a superficial level, it’s strange that the Padres are better-suited to the regular season than the playoffs. The narrative of Tatis-era teams has been of stars and scrubs which would seem to be October-friendly.
I guess ZiPS just really doesn’t believe in Michael King (or their rotation in general).
It could be that ZiPS doesn’t see King as a starter in the postseason (the Padres have alluded to that with Cease/Darvish/Musgrove lined up for a potential WC round).. but it still seems a bit odd. Seems like ZiPS values star performance over depth/”completeness”.
Atlanta is definitely not 5th in baseball in runs scored. More like 19th.
TC
I get 16th
Both by total runs and R/G
Close! 16th. 19th is the Tigers.
Oops, I meant homers!
Based totally off my ‘feels’ watching the last 10 days on my MLB App, I am expecting a Phillies-Guardians WS.
That actually sounds really interesting. Phillies are a traditional team in most respects, with a strong back of the pen, big bats, a good rotation, and hit-or-miss defense. The Guardians are a pitching and defense team that leans heavily on their bullpen and stringing hits together to make things happen. Clash of styles. Sounds like fun!
I think the Padres’ and Phillies’ projections are getting dinged because they have a lot of singles and doubles hitters and don’t have a lot of elite power hitters who can carry a team like the Yankees or Dodgers. But to me, they are the two scariest teams out there, on at least the same level as the Dodgers (whose starting pitching is going to need to get bailed out by the bullpen a lot) or the Yankees (whose back half of the lineup is a major problem and where the bullpen isn’t great).
The Padres are getting dinged because Arraez, Profar, Merrill, Cronenworth, Bogaerts, and Kim don’t hit a ton of homers. But the offense is still really good–5th in wRC+ on the year–so even if it plays less in the playoffs it’s still extremely good. There are almost no weak spots in this lineup, most of them have some power, and Tatis and Machado give them a lot of thump. The Phillies also have a couple of big power hitters (Harper and Schwarber) followed by a lot of other good hitters with a little power (Turner, Bohm, Marsh)–again, there aren’t many weak spots in the lineup. They are 8th in wRC+.
Both teams have devastating top 3 pitchers and elite-and-deep bullpens. The Phillies have Wheeler (5.2 fWAR), Nola (3.0 fWAR), and Sanchez (4.7 fWAR), while the Padres have Cease (4.6 fWAR), King (3.9 fWAR), and Musgrove (who had a terrible start to the year but since he came back from injury in August he has put up 1.5 fWAR in only 44 innings).
The bullpens of each are crazy. The Padres have four relievers with fWARs higher than 1 on the season, and a fifth will probably get there (Suarez), leaving a guy with a 1.95 ERA as the sixth guy out of the bullpen (Hoeing). The Phillies have two relievers with more than two fWAR on the year (Hoffman, Strahm) and another with more than one (Kerkering). These teams can pull their elite starters after two times through the order if they want to and then grind their opponents down.
I understand why the model has the Dodgers and Yankees ahead because projection system loves “sure thing” stars in a playoff series, but the idea that the Orioles and Astros would be ahead of the Phillies and Padres? No, I don’t see it. Sorry.
Estevez is on the Phillies and has been worth 1.2 fWAR this season too, so there’s a fourth guy at >1.
The Dbacks were 22nd in HR last year and still made it to the WS. Not sure why FG is leaning so heavily on home runs.
The teams that have done the best job of seducing this year’s luck dragons are the ones that are best equipped to advance.
I’m hoping for a 2006 Cardinals-like run for my Tigers…they deserve it. Bullpen has been unreal, kids are playing hard.
Hinch has done a marvelous job.
Manager of the year candidate?
Should be the favorite. I’m sure some would argue for Quatraro but what the Tigers have done is pretty remarkable.
I read this as the difference between the best team and the worst of team is only 11%.
11% difference among 15 teams.
Considering we only do this once and not hundreds of times, that’s pretty darn close to random.
Don’t buy that the dodgers are well equipped for the playoffs. They have 2 starters, well 3 if you buy knack i guess. Neither of which are top 10 in sport, 1 of which has struggled some of late and had a significant FB velo down turn last time out.
Furthermore Padres seem well built for postseason, they have 4 starters in good form and a very good back end of pen.
Phillies to me seem far and away best built, given they have 4 very good starters and 1 who is having a historically bad year
The Dodgers are well built in the sense that they don’t have to worry about relying on Chris Taylor in the playoffs, they’ve got a handful of players who are projected to hit a lot of homers, and they don’t have to worry about their lack of a functional #4 or #5 starter But yeah, the starting pitching is a mess. I like Yamamoto a lot and Flaherty has the potential to be great too but when Landon Knack is the third guy in your playoff rotation you are playing with fire.
The projections don’t know this, but there’s another issue going on. There’s a good chance they’re going to wind up having to do a bullpen game or two, but all of their good relievers except Grove only go one inning at a time. There are a lot of decision points for Dave Roberts to make with his relievers in this situation, and that kind of stuff is the Dodgers’ kryptonite.
In think it’s wrong to think teams don’t need their 4th starter. The days of the best three pitchers pitching on three days rest in the playoffs are long gone, so you need four starters if you don’t sweep every series. I agree that the 5th starter is most likely to be used in long relief
Am I the only one depressed by how highly the Mariners (and their 2.7% playoff odds) rank in both metrics? What a miserably frustrating season…
I can’t imagine your frustration but I can I imagine how frustrated I’d be if I were a Mariners fan. It’s a lot.
The Gypsy Lady invoked the big market curse! Cleveland wins the World Series 2024! Good article.
Definitely disagree on the Yankees and dodgers. one doesn’t have a starting rotation, the other doesn’t have more than 2 hitters. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re both early exits
Eh, the Yankees’ lack of offensive depth is way overblown. Chisholm, Dominguez, and Stanton are very good. Wells has been good outside of September. Gleyber has been good outside of April. They have other solid hitters, though I doubt the team would dare make the bold move of replacing either Rizzo or Volpe.
With the exception of their defense the Padres are perfectly built for the postseason. Deep and talented bullpen, they put the ball in play, they can situationally hit. As a bonus Yu and Musgrove look healthy and will be in midseason form for October while everyone else’s SPs are starting to run on fumes. My only concern is Shildt.
I have always sort of figured that contact matters a touch more in the playoffs, because you are generally not seeing 5th or sometimes even 4th starters, and better bullpen arms, and quicker hooks, so everyone is going to strike out more. But maybe that is entirely false.
It’s more accurate than most realize.
Plus you’re facing strikeout pitchers. If a strikeout pitcher can’t strike you out they’re basically a normal pitcher. It’s sort of neutralizing.
This is surprising to me. I don’t watch much NL, but when I do…the top teams look better than the AL’s top teams. I was kind of expecting 5 or 6 NL Teams along with the Astros and Yankees at the top of the best equipped for the postseason.
Are these the same Zips projections from the start of the year that projected the Brewers to go 81-81 or have they been updated to reflect the current season?
How bout them Tigers RAWR!!!!!!
The Guards have had an unfavorable SP match up for most of the season and Vogt has managed around it. I don’t know how many innings the projection system is giving to guys like Lively, Williams, etc but it’s probably more than the Guards plan on giving them. Would not surprise me at all to see a bullpen game in each series, and Bibee will be the only starter with any leash.
Why “Then I projected every team again, only this time with a usage pattern that reflects the differences in playoff baseball, with a higher proportion of the playing time given to a team’s best healthy players, especially its starting pitchers.”
when bellpen usage goes up to like 50% of all IP pitched in the playoffs?