Whit Merrifield and Royals Seek Safety

There aren’t many candidates for best player on the Kansas City Royals. Salvador Perez is a holdover from the team’s run to consecutive World Series’, including one title. Adalberto Mondesi has just 500 plate appearances across three seasons, but he showed considerable promise last season with 14 homers, 32 steals, and a 114 wRC+ in just half a season. The third candidate, and the subject of this post, is Whit Merrifield. The Royals second baseman has been the club’s best player over the past two seasons by putting eight wins, with the only other players above four (Lorenzo Cain and Eric Hosmer) not even on the team a season ago. Merrifield was a late bloomer, not playing a full season until he was 29 years old in 2017, and that makes him an unusual contract extension candidate, but he and the Royals reached a reasonable deal to buy out his remaining arbitration years.

At first glance, the terms of the deal look incredibly slight for Merrifield, getting just $16.25 million guaranteed with $2 million in performance bonuses, per Jon Morosi. With a second straight slow winter for free agents and Manny Machado and Bryce Harper unable to get the long-term deals they desire so far, seeing an All-Star second baseman coming off a very good season settle for such a small guarantee screams out as another piece of evidence of owners getting the better of players. However, that’s not really the case here due to Merrifield’s age and service time.

Merrifield got a late start to his major league career due to a slow crawl up the minors. He was solid in his first full minor league season, posting an average line in High-A back in 2011, and when he repeated the league in 2012, he was roughly the same player and then struggled in a brief promotion to Double-A. The next season he was the same roughly average player at Double-A. He then tore through Double-A in 2014 and held his own in Triple-A, getting to the cusp of the majors, but he took a step back the following season back in Triple-A, entering the 2016 campaign at 27 years old without a callup.

Finally making the big leagues, Merrifield proved to be an above-average player thanks to decent defense, great baserunning, and a roughly average bat. He broke out last season, increasing his walk rate, posting slightly-below-average power numbers with a great BABIP on his way to a 120 wRC+. His 45 steals in 55 tries plus good running -numbers on balls in play added another seven runs above average, resulting in a five-win season. His projections next season are closer to three wins, but there is little doubt that Merrifield is a good, solid player who will help the Royals win more games than they would have without him.

Unfortunately for Merrifield, he enters the 2019 season with just two-and-a-half seasons in the bigs. He’s not yet eligible for arbitration, and he won’t be eligible for free agency until after the 2022 season. Players with Merrifield’s service time and good track records in the big leagues are often approached about contract extensions. They are looking at one more season at the league-minimum salary, and teams take advantage of that lack of security by offering players millions of dollars. In exchange for that security, teams generally insist on a year or two of the player’s free agent seasons at a discounted rate. Those seasons often become massive bargains as players push out their free agent seasons and teams don’t have to pay for any of the player’s decline seasons. Whit Merrifield presents an interesting case.

When Merrifield hits free agency for the first time, he will be 34 years old. While the Royals certainly like Merrifield for his on-field contributions now, he’s not likely to be the same player at 34 that he is right now. Those free agent years might not be particularly valuable for the Royals, which lessens the club’s interest in guaranteeing money for those years. They might be interested in an option year, but that makes less sense for Merrifield. Security makes sense for Merrifield as opposed to playing out this season and then going to arbitration, where he might get around $4 million if he puts together a solid campaign. If he keeps playing well, he might get $6 million or $7 million in 2021, and then $10 million or $12 million in 2022. Going year-to-year in arbitration probably gets him around $20 million or so if he keeps playing well.

In the end, Merrifield gets his security and the Royals take a 20% discount on the likely outcome. This deal is reminiscent of the one the Twins signed Brian Dozier to four years ago. That contract paid Dozier $20 million over four seasons. Value-wise, Dozier had similar numbers to Merrifield with 7.4 WAR over the previous two years and a 4.5 WAR season just prior to signing the extension. Because Dozier had numbers that pay in arbitration, namely homers, he was likely to receive more money in arbitration than Merrifield. Dozier was also two years younger, making a decline less likely. It was important to Dozier at that time to be able to hit free agency now as opposed to a few years from now. A disappointing 2018 season meant just a one-year deal for Dozier, although if he had kept playing at his 2014-2017 level, he would have been able to cash in on free agency, even in this slow market.

Merrifield’s contract is just an update of the Dozier contract, where teams get some cost certainty and a discount in the arbitration years while the player gets security and doesn’t give up any free agent seasons. These contracts don’t happen often because there is little incentive for the team compared to most of the guarantees they offer to players before they hit arbitration. If the players want security, the cost is generally a free agent year or two. Merrifield’s late age compared to his service time peers created an opportunity for the Royals and their second baseman to reach a deal, and given these factors, it is a pretty reasonable one for both sides.





Craig Edwards can be found on twitter @craigjedwards.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tz
5 years ago

Besides being set for life, Merrifield has to figure this deal keeps him attractive to contending teams right now. If he places a high value on getting a WS ring, this can’t hurt his chances.

Jaymember
5 years ago
Reply to  tz

Can’t imagine a player being excited to have an attractive contract for acquiring teams. Attractive to teams = underpaid. If I were a player I’d want to be on an albatross deal.

Still, good deal on both sides IMO. Royals get a likely discount. Merrifield gets life-changing money. One of baseball’s worst teams buying out arb years for a 30 year old is pretty boring as far as offseason storylines go, but I guess that’s where we’re at in 2019.

jonvanderlugtmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Phrased the way you put it, no, Whit probably wouldn’t be excited to have a contract that’s “attractive to contending teams.” But consider the relative position that he’s in and how Craig outlined it above.

Could Whit be excited to have a contract that “guarantees ~80% of what his maximum earning power over the next four seasons could be while greatly increasing the probably he won’t play on a team that sucks?”

Sure, I could see that.

Jaymember
5 years ago
Reply to  jonvanderlugt

I agree that Whit is pleased with the deal, which I said in my comment. But I don’t understand why buying out his arb years on a minor discount “greatly increases” the odds of him being traded to a better team. Would a contending team have been scared off by the idea of acquiring a prearb player with 4 years of control who *might* make $20M if he stays good?

mikejuntmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

This fails to recognize how AAV works for tax purposes. Lets imagine Merrifield doesn’t sign this deal and is traded. His pay goes something like 500k, 3m, 5m, 8m or something

Since those salaries are arbitrated each year, in the later two years of the deal, his tax value is substantially higher than it is when it’s a consistent 4m

Cost surety is easier to build around and the team is less likely to nontender a 33 year old Merrifield who isn’t worth what he’ll earn as an Arb3.

Robertmember
5 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Very, very good point. I don’t think that’s something regularly considered when we look at arb extensions.

jonvanderlugtmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

When I say “greatly increases,” admittedly I mean going from like 10% to like 25% or something. Still more likely than not he remains a Royal but 25% is (2.5)10%.

Mean Mr. Mustard
5 years ago
Reply to  jonvanderlugt

I’m not so sure he does “greatly increase the chance he won’t play on a team that sucks”.
Since he’s cheap, the Royals have no incentive to offload him unless some playoff-bound team offers a king’s ransom…which no team would do given the glut of options out there at second base; most of them could be had at less prospect cost.

Francoeursteinmember
5 years ago

Im not sure about that. If he goes out and has another 4 WAR type season, then I’m sure a team that’s desperate for a quality 2B will offer an attractive package. Especially a team like the Dodgers who could very well have a hole at second base, value positional flexibility, and are desperate to get over the hump by winning it all.

oozyalbies1
5 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

Sure, but didn’t we assume the same about Brian Dozier? He likely exceeded even the best projection for Merrifield in 2016-2017 (11.2 fWAR), and he ultimately was traded in his walk year for a relatively paltry return. Now, maybe a good deal of blame for that outcome should be placed on the Twins themselves for holding out for too long.

The lesson: if Merrifield continues to exceed expectations, based on his profile, the Royals will likely be better of trading him sooner rather than later. And this extension makes the player slightly more valuable under those circumstances.

RoyalsFan#14321member
5 years ago
Reply to  jonvanderlugt

“Interestingly”, the Royals were the only team who were allowed to negotiate a contract with Whit. I imagine that a lot of teams aren’t necessarily scared or concerned about trading for a player like him running through arbitration, but I can imagine the request to negotiate an extension prior to a trade being difficult and this deal might actually make him more attractive to other teams…

Maybe.

kick me in the GO NATSmember
5 years ago
Reply to  Jay

Any player can play his contract into an albatross if he wants it bad enough.

Bobby Ayala
5 years ago
Reply to  tz

I would also argue that a player who desperately wants to be traded would not sign an extension at all. There’s a greater chance today that he’s a Royal for life than yesterday.