Why Do Sweepers Cause So Many Popups?

© Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports

We’re still in a relatively new era of pitch design. Just this past year, we saw several successful pitchers embrace a sweeping breaking ball. Last month, Justin Choi wrote about one of those pitchers, Julio Urías, and noted that his new sweeper generates a great number of popups and lift. It’s not just Urías; in general, sweepers have a tendency to generate balls hit in the air at a rather skewed clip:

It’s strange behavior not just for a non-fastball, but for a breaking pitch especially; as you can see, sweepers have nearly double the popup rate of their fellow breaking balls:

Batted Ball Distribution: Breaking Pitches, 2021
GB% LD% FB% PU%
Non-Sweeper 45.2% 23.7% 24.8% 6.4%
Sweeper 36.1% 22.3% 30.7% 10.9%
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

So why do sweepers generate so many popups? Before we go any further, let’s define the sweeper. It has its own sub-classification based on movement and velocity, more concisely detailed here by Driveline’s Dan Aucoin. It’s a pitch classification that stretches across curves, sliders, and knuckle/spike curves; in practice, it looks something like a slurve but with some characteristics of the knuckle/spike curve. Here’s how it fits within conventional pitch classifications (the sweeper is highlighted in pink):

So how do sweepers stack up to non-sweepers in launch angle?

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The distributions are similar, but the sweeper results in a considerably larger number of popups, which is backed up by the gap in popup rate.

This is all rather broad, though; the sweeper classification encompasses a great number of pitches. Ignoring these classifications, what should we understand about the interplay between movement/velocity and popups?

There have been plenty of words spilled on this site about horizontal and vertical approach angle. We care about movement, but the direct angle of the pitch from the pitcher’s release point has an impact here, too:

There’s a clear relationship here between VAA and average launch angle, with pitches with shallower vertical break in general getting put into the air more often. Still, let’s fold in velocity to both VAA and HAA to see if that makes things any clearer:

With VAA, a pitch thrown harder and at a more shallow approach angle results in higher launch angle, but many of those lower-end VAAs are largely location driven, and velocity is still a factor. There is even less to be pulled from the relationship between HAA and velocity, though that owes more to wider approach angles being better at garnering popups.

There’s nothing readily apparent about increased velocity that would help explain the sweeper’s popup characteristics. VAA and HAA are certainly a part of the puzzle, but it also helps to see what’s going on location-wise:

Regardless of location, sweepers just about anywhere in the zone tend to generate higher launch angles compared to our non-sweeping breaking balls. Now, it isn’t necessarily a good thing to have batters be able to lift pitches low in the zone that could otherwise be groundballs, but this launch angle gap exists everywhere.

It’s worth noting that these are league-wide numbers that aren’t specific to batter types. Pitcher-batter matchups matter greatly, so it could be helpful to know how effective the sweeper is against batters with different swing types, particularly those who might have more lift in their swing. There isn’t much in the public space that we can use for swing data, but we can take the average launch angle on a batter’s hardest-hit balls as a stand-in for their attack angle. Here’s a look at sweeper and non-sweeper launch angle by batter attack angle:

Even broken down by different batter attack angles, the sweeper consistently generates more lift.

I’ve been trying to find different reasons as to why batters get under and lift the sweeper, but a more definitive answer likely doesn’t exist in the data available to us. The individual components highlighted here have some degree of connection: shallow VAAs, large HAAs, and a sprinkling of increased velocity all point toward increased launch angles. But beyond that, it’s unclear what the cause is. It could well be that batters read the pitch out of the hand as a breaking ball and fail to correct for the lack of vertical drop. It could be that such wide horizontal movement is harder to track, or that increased velocity amplifies both of these issues.

This exercise did little to prove why batters get under sweepers, but it did confirm that the individual characteristics of sweepers are the same characteristics associated with generating high fly balls and popups. Regardless, it’s unlikely that this pitch type will fall out of favor anytime soon.





Owen is a contributor at FanGraphs. He got his start blogging about baseball when he was in college and you can find him maybe talking about something on Twitter @O_dotco.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lunch AngleMember since 2016
4 years ago

could it be as simple as: a batter is more likely to hit under a sweeper because a sweeper by definition drops less than other breaking balls?

Lance BrozdowskiMember since 2023
4 years ago

I think a pretty logical guess here is that a lot of sweepers, from what I understand, possess a change in axis that results in some added vertical movement (seam-shifted wake).

Look at Blake Treinen’s SL for example, McCullers as well.

And with seam-shifted wake, it seems like the consensus is that added movement is a bit unexpected. So if it’s unexpected to a hitter and the pitch ends up higher than they anticipate (like a fastball with big vertical / flat approach), I could see why they’d pop it up more.

Connects to that old anecdote I heard that hitters sometimes have to swing “2 balls” above where they think the pitch will be.

To prove this, I guess you’d have to run something to see if pitches with some degree of SSW that add vertical movement (starting with an axis closer to 6:00pm than the resulting axis) have a higher resulting launch angle than pitches without SSW?

D.K. WillardsonMember since 2020
4 years ago

Interesting article. Since we’ve got Vertical Bat Angle (VBA) data of in-game MLB data for the past three years, I was curious whether this was a factor. In general, higher VBA players hit fewer popups (they essentially trade the more performance friendly spray angle variability for vertical/LA variability).

I produced the data as detailed above and looked at it from the hitter standpoint. While VBA does explain sweeper pop ups, it is similar to the R2 for breaking ball popups.

What is really interesting is that players who hit more IFFBs generally tend to have lower contact quality – so more bad hits and lower xWOBAcon); however, there is no connection between sweeper popups and contact quality. So as mentioned by others, it does look like hitters are just getting fooled on the pitch not dropping as much as they expect. There don’t appear to be tendencies in swing path (VBA or attack angle) that explain the increased percentage of sweeper popups.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

I thought I knew what a sweeper is, but now I’m not so sure. I thought a sweeper was a slider with big horizontal break. That’s kind of what’s in that scatterplot but I’m confused by the vertical break axis.

BryzMember since 2019
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Since the sweepers are labeled in pink, it’s showing pitches that have far more horizontal break than downward vertical break. Owen isn’t classifying just the big horizontal breakers.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Bryz

Let me try again. There’s a vertical axis there. I know that what it’s supposed to be is something like -2 inches of depth from 40 ft out, based on the linked tweet. The idea is generally that it’s not supposed to have big vertical break downwards. Okay, but there are actually plenty of pitches on that chart that have more vertical break that are not classified as sweepers, but more generally as sliders.

Moreover, maybe I just have no spatial awareness but is that really showing that sliders all tend to break upwards? Maybe it’s just breaking upwards at a certain point and I’m confused. When is it saying it is breaking upwards, exactly? Are we talking at the end of the pitch or mid pitch?

DrazMember since 2025
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Video would help, I also thought I knew but not sure now.

RonnieDobbs
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

It is a slurve. A slurve is a derogatory term for a breaking ball that lacks a better shape.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
4 years ago

Also, if you’re wondering why this article is getting no engagement, it’s because it is “below the fold” on the homepage so no one can see it. Kind of frustrating to see good work wind up a casualty of the new layout.

D.K. WillardsonMember since 2020
4 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yeah, really a shame on the engagement as this is a really interesting topic. Been looking at the data on this most the afternoon. Thought it was interesting that sweepers actually have a slightly higher wOBA/xWOBAcon than reg. breaking balls. Looks like the downside of higher popups is more than offset by the higher propensity for fly balls (vs GBs)

Waynes94Member since 2024
4 years ago

I was taught in high school to swing under the curve. I was not a good hitter so I still tended get over the top and hit high choppers. You might look for the reverse effect of what you studied, ie extreme negative launch angles being more frequent with non sweepers than sweepers.

RonnieDobbs
4 years ago
Reply to  Waynes94

That is the most absurd thing I have ever heard of.

BryzMember since 2019
4 years ago

Like a few others have suggested, I’m wondering if this is related to batters expecting certain pitches to have certain movement profiles. The sweeper has far less vertical break than other breaking balls, so hitters are getting slightly under the pitches more frequently, causing the pop-ups.

RonnieDobbs
4 years ago

It is called a slurve and its not new. Keep inventing those new terms though! The only thing less productive than creating a new label for an existing pitch is categorizing everything that is not the new label as a non-sweeper. There is literally no chance that this is productive analysis.

channelclemente
4 years ago

An article from earlier this month contributed by a ‘fan’ suggests why. The article was about ‘going with the pitch’.