Why the Diamondbacks Are in First Place
If you’re like me, you’ve been assuming the Dodgers would end up in first in the NL West for a while. Indeed, our playoff odds are still big fans, because it’s hard to overlook the track records of the various players around the Dodgers’ roster. If I had to make a prediction right now, I’d still settle on the Dodgers to be there at the end. Maybe that makes me smart. Maybe that makes me stubborn. Could be a little of both. I don’t like to be put on the spot.
But for however much talent the Dodgers possess, on August 16 we’re looking at the first-place Diamondbacks. The club’s been playing .500 baseball for a month and a half, yet still, they’re looming above the Dodgers and Rockies. When it comes to explaining why the Diamondbacks are where they are, credit has to go to good hitters like Paul Goldschmidt, David Peralta, and apparently Daniel Descalso. Credit also has to go to good pitchers like Patrick Corbin and Zack Greinke. And then there’s the helpful matter of so-called “cluster luck” — the Dodgers have a better run differential than the Diamondbacks do. No team reaches first place because of one reason alone.
Here, however, I’d like to shine some light on the Diamondbacks’ greatest strength. To this point I’d say it’s gone underappreciated, but I’ll show you the evidence in seven plots. The Diamondbacks have had an incredible defense.
I’m going to split this up and proceed area by area. And to get right to the point, let’s take a look at league-wide catcher defense. This information comes from Baseball Prospectus, and these numbers try to include everything, from pitch-framing to pitch-blocking:
The one thing we don’t really understand is game-calling. That part might be hopelessly complicated. Based on what we can analyze, though, the Diamondbacks have had the game’s best defensive catchers, largely because they’ve had the game’s best receivers. In case you want some supporting evidence, you can find on Baseball Savant that Diamondbacks pitchers have gotten the highest called strike rate on pitches taken around the edges. That’s the framing impact. And Defensive Runs Saved also has a catcher-defense column. The Diamondbacks rank first there, too, at +18 runs. Everyone, then, is in agreement, and most of this is because of Jeff Mathis and John Ryan Murphy. I should tell you we’re only just getting started.
That’s catchers. How about pitchers? We don’t talk that much about pitcher defense, because pitchers usually don’t get that many defensive opportunities, but there’s a DRS column that we might as well consult. Not only do pitchers get to try to make some plays on batted balls; they’re also mostly in control of the running game. Here’s the landscape of team pitcher defense, according to DRS:
First-place Diamondbacks. Sure, they’re at just +10 runs, but then, ten runs is basically a win. They’ve made good plays on batted balls, and they’ve picked off a handful of runners, while preventing others from stealing many bases. Not much more that pitchers can do in this department. So with catchers and pitchers down, why not turn our attention to the rest of the infield?
For the next two plots, I decided to take the average of each team’s DRS and UZR. I don’t prefer one to the other, so I settle by splitting the middle. The infield picture:
Seventh-place Diamondbacks. Seventh isn’t first, but it’s still pretty good. Besides, I’ll have more to say about this later. Here’s the outfield picture:
Third-place Diamondbacks. First behind the plate, first on the mound, seventh around the infield dirt, third on the outfield grass. Already, that’s painting a rosy picture. But of course, as I feel like I constantly remind you, it’s the Statcast era! We might be able to do better than DRS and UZR! Those measures don’t do very well when it comes to handling defensive shifts, or non-traditional alignments. As you know, non-traditional alignments have become the modern-day traditional alignments. So let’s play with something. You know what wOBA is. By now, I imagine you also know what expected wOBA is. It stands to reason that, if you look at the difference between the two, that should have some good relationship to defensive performance. Ballpark environment is also a factor — as always, Coors Field is weird — but just for the hell of it, here’s the landscape of 2018 differences:
Right away, you’ll notice almost every team is below zero. That’s because xwOBA is calculated over multiple years, and this year the ball hasn’t been as lively as it was in the recent past. What’s most important is where each team is, relative to one another. Here we see the Diamondbacks in second, behind only the A’s. The A’s also have a good defense! The A’s are the team with Matt Chapman.
That’s the overall xwOBA picture. Here’s how it looks when you narrow to only grounders and pop-ups, which I’m using as a proxy for infield defense:
The Diamondbacks are in first, ahead of the Chapman infield. Remember, according to combined DRS and UZR, the Diamondbacks infield ranks seventh. I don’t know if I can say confidently that this is a better metric, but it’s probably at least as good. The infield defense has evidently been strong. And now, here’s the xwOBA picture on flies and liners, which I’m using to measure outfields:
Almost everyone’s below zero because, again, the ball hasn’t been flying like it did. Based on xwOBA alone, there should be a higher league-wide homer total. That’s not what matters, for this post. The Diamondbacks here show up in second place. This doesn’t account for, say, outfielder arms, and that’s not where the Diamondbacks shine, but covering ground and catching balls is the component of greater significance. The other numbers suggest the team’s outfield defense has been good. This backs that suggestion up. Based on the batted balls the Diamondbacks have allowed, you’d expect far more hits than they’ve actually given up. That’s a credit to the players in the field.
This isn’t the most thorough analysis that could ever be conducted. I haven’t bothered to talk to anyone, and I haven’t bothered to look up whether the Diamondbacks have been playing around with different shifting strategies. I don’t know what, exactly, they might be doing differently in the field. It’s probably at least as much about the personnel. Someone else can attempt the deep dive — interviewing the players, talking to the front office, embedding videos of plays made that wouldn’t have been made in seasons past.
All I really want to do here is make a basic point. It’s moderately surprising the Diamondbacks are still in first place. Many different factors have combined to get them there, but on the defensive side of the equation, no team in baseball has been getting better defense from its catchers. No team in baseball has been getting better defense from its pitchers. Few teams, if any, in baseball have been getting better defense from their infielders, and few teams in baseball have been getting better defense from their outfielders. All things considered, the 2018 Diamondbacks have had the best defense in either league. Defense can never win a team a game on its own, but it can make little differences pitch after pitch, and play after play. Over the course of a full baseball season, those little differences have an awful lot of time to accumulate.
Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.







No comment on wOBA- xwOBA essentially just creating park factors? Seems pretty obvious those charts are heavily affected by park effects, not just defense effects.
https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/meet-the-new-chase-field/
Plugging Jeff’s article from earlier today. Within it he suggests that, yes, park effects have probably changed in Chase in 2018. But, keep in mind, there aren’t any home-only stats in this article, if I’m reading correctly.
The purpose of this article is to illustrate that the team has done a very good job capitalizing defensively on whatever new factors 2018 has brought. A ‘new’ nearly average home park, a possible de-juiced ball, different ingame defensive strategies, or even better defensive players.
Wouldn’t the lower EV just lower xwOBA? How is it a comment on better defense?
I’m not well versed enough in xwOBA to understand this. Is this true other than for foul flies, IF grass height, OF wall quirks, and home runs?
Oak shows up here to for a reason. They are almost rolling a inverted Rays pitching staff. Almost all the starters pitch to contact, make it into the 6th-7th in most starts, have a super short leash after 2x through the order, and the team can function on a multi inning limited starter.
When your close lead days go Trevino/Rodney/Petit in the 6-7th Familia 8th Trienen 9th, and you have Butcher, Pagan, Kelley as subs for availability your pretty happy.
Fowler who has hit like .650 since he was sent down will be another good late inning defender in Sept, Hell Mateo is on the 40 man to protect him already so he could make a ton of sense as a late inning defender at short and second who has 80 speed for pinch running I could even see him on a playoff roster in a Terence Gore role. The team will also add Dull, Bassit, Wendlken, and Lucas up Sept 1st to bolster the pen. Triggs, Blackburn might help in a multi inning roll.
Look at Brett Anderson just rolling through quality starts lately, and I have to think it has something to do with him only facing the lineup a third time through until any baserunner reaches unless he has a huge lead, and his pitch count in the last 5 or so starts has been below 80P.
The team almost seems to be intentionally pitching to contact with the starters so that the defense can do its job. Manaea for instance was pitching for Ks early in the year and then seemed to make a conscience decision to go the other way.
Great comment. Which is part of the reason I like to look at bref war as a reference point pitching WAR. If your coach tells you to pitch to contact due to your bullpen/defense, fangraphs basically says your results aren’t real.
Another data point supporting the importance of defense: The Cubs. The rotation has been flat terrible, yet they are also in first place…..defense probably keeping them afloat as well.
You sound like a Theo Epstein who is desperate to justify Jason Heyward’s presence on the team.
Heyward is having a pretty good year, no?
Heyward’s defense hasn’t been that great this year
Mehhh
Hard not to notice though that the Cubs are 3rd from last in the catcher list. I keep reading on FanGraphs that Contreras is “an offensive catcher” that costs his team runs in the field, and now I see that BP is similarly down on him. BUT FG also has him tied for second among catchers in defensive WAR. So … how can we trust any of this data when it’s so conflicting?
There’s not actually a conflict. Fangraphs’ dWAR for catchers is a placeholder at this point because it doesn’t include any information about framing, which we know can swing tens of runs worth of value. Instead, Fangraphs’ Def is mostly a positional adjustment multiplied by playing time with small tweaks for stolen bases / pickoffs.
Contreras leads MLB in innings caught, does relatively well on the throwing aspects of stolen bases, and backpicks runners at bases as much as anyone in the game. All that is great. However, he’s been a very poor framer since the end of 2016, with BP showing the MLB-worst Cubs being 35.4 runs worse than the MLB-best DBacks as a team (that’s three and a half team wins on catcher framing alone!) with Contreras accounting for most of that figure as a product of bad framing and the most framing chances of any catcher in MLB.
you can analysis the data to see its correlations etc., plenty of work done on defensive metrics
You may imagine I know what xwOBA is but I’m not sure I see how xwOBA-wOBA is proxy for defense. At Baseball Savant they say it’s based on launch angle and exit velocity. It seems like the difference between xwOBA and wOBA can include defensive skill as the article states, but also whether the balls are hit right at or far away from defenders. The latter is partly positioning, partly bat control and partly random chance, no? I’m not seeing how this is “at least as good” as UZR and DRS which purport to isolate achievements of individual defenders. Until someone corrects me, which I’m sure they will in this crowd, my tentative conclusion is that the Arizona defenders are good but they’re not the best. Pitchers’ results are exceeding pitcher achievements partly as a result of very good defense, but also probably positioning and random chance.
According to Inside Edge Diamondbacks have 30 more of the very easiest fielding chances than the Dodgers and the Dodgers have 41 more of Impossible or most difficult chances than the Diamondbacks. I’m not sure if this is mostly an indication of random chance, positioning, both or neither, but it seems interesting.
The Diamondbacks are in 1st place because they’re a pretty good team playing pretty much up to the level of their collective talent and ability, and getting very fortunate with “cluster luck”, and most importantly because the Dodgers are woefully underperforming their talent level, run differential and have been very unlucky with injuries, bullpen randomness, and hit clustering.
Just based on run differential alone the Dodgers should be up by something like 3 games right now, which ignores the difference in talent between the two teams as well. But if the Dodgers are just even on Pythagorean win expectancy and the Diamondbacks kept their same record it’d be a 5 game lead. And no one would be talking about this.
The story of the NL West this year is the Dodgers underperforming, it’s had a complete domino effect on the rest of the division, especially their 4-8 record against Arizona, mostly from early April when the Dodgers were missing Justin Turner, Max Muncy was in the minor leagues, Seager was playing with a torn UCL, Jansen had no spring training and Yasiel Puig had an absolutely horrific month. It will be very interesting to see what happens when they play at the end of this month with Machado, Dozier, Turner, Muncy and a healthy Jansen.
Dodger bullpen: 2.2 fWAR, 1.3 fWPA
Diamondback bullpen: 1.8 fWAR, 4.0 fWPA
Clutch bullpening.
Actually, Diamondbacks bullpen has not been that clutch.
(2nd in RA9-war, 5th in WPA, 13th in Clutch among NL teams)
You act like the Dbacks were healthy during those games. They weren’t. Souza, Lamb, Walker, and Ray were hurt, Matt Koch was a mainstay in the rotation, and Goldy was struggling
I mean, they started 21-8 and were helped by Kenley Jansen blowing a save by allowing a 3-run HR to Chris freaking Owings. Patrick Corbin was throwing like 3mph harder than the rest of the season, the bullpen started their run of just being a solid 1-2 runs better in ERA than FIP…the Diamondbacks are 46-47 since that start and they have the hardest schedule in the National League coming up the rest of the year, per Fangraphs projections, this series against the Padres excepted. And btw, the Dodgers have basically never been healthy all year, and obviously there hasn’t been much time after the Machado and Dozier trades, but they’ve probably had maybe what, 6-7 games with Dozier, Machado, Turner and Jansen all healthy.
Also, not sure that Robbie Ray’s 4.78 ERA and 4.42 FIP is really helping that much, especially considering he’s getting helped in WAR calculations by outdated park factors based on the old pre-humidor Chase Field. And Clay Buchholz. That’s pretty much all I”ll say about that.
Even with the terrible run of 5 straight losses and 7 straight bullpen meltdowns the Dodgers have been 49-31 since their horrific 16-26 start, a .613 winning percentage. I’m picking arbitrary dates, I know, the point is just that the Diamondbacks got out to a very hot start based mostly around luck, have ridden a continued wave of luck (Buchholz, Ahmed, Descalso, Peralta having career years and the entire bullpen being extraordinarily lucky, like, BY FAR the luckiest in MLB) to have this lead. The Dodgers have had some luck too, mostly with the unexpected Muncy and Kemp contributions, but they’ve also had a truly incomprehensible amount of injuries and bad luck to underperform their run differential this much. The Diamondbacks will probably wind up winning the division because the Dodgers legacy is to have great players underperform, and because Friedman and Zaidi didn’t do a good enough job of building a bullpen with guys like Silvino Bracho, Andrew Chafin and TJ McFarland. You have to hand it to the Diamondbacks for knowing that Bracho would go from 7.30 and 5.66 ERAs to being dominant and that McFarland could strike out 4 guys per 9 innings and have a 1.93 ERA. I hate baseball.
ianmSC — typical Dodger troll that thinks his team descended from God himself and the rest of the league should be thankful they even exist at the feet of his exalted team. He ignores the misfortunes of the Dbacks and only considers the misfortunes of the Dodgers.
It’s also telling about the Diamondbacks that even with Goldschmidt being Barry Bonds (.340/.433/.637 20 HR’s and a 183 wRC+) since June 1st, AND all of the other luck, they’ve still been so mediocre.
All that said, congrats on winning the division and I look forward to seeing Zack Godley and Clay Buchholz shut out the Red Sox or Astros in back to back starts and TJ McFarland or Brad Boxberger and his 4.5 FIP closing it out on the mound.
Just a side note: Bonds had 6 whole seasons with a better wRC+ than Goldschmidt’s hot 2.5 months.
ianmSC – why are you so BITTER? Your team is better than most in MLB, maybe not the Dbacks right now, but life will go on either way 🙂
I’ll throw this out there – I’m pretty sure this is not a repeatable skill but the DBacks lead the majors in 1st inning runs, and by a fair amount. THey came into tonight with 98 and just dropped a 5 spot on poor Jacob Nix in his MLB debut. That gives them 103 runs in the 1st inning, Cleveland has 92 and only 3 other teams are over 80 (COL, NYY, SEA)
It probably just shows that they have a very good top of the order, but a mediocre or worse bottom part. From that perspective, maybe it is repeatable.
My Orioles, man… Jesus Christ
Dbacks are in first place because they have won more games than the other teams in their division.
Check out the big brain on Brad
1) They would not be in first place in any other division
2) They are 1/2 game behind Philly, who have a famously poor DRS
So while their defense is excellent, it’s hard to isolate it as the secret reason why they are in first place
Very interesting article. It’s surprising how much succes the D backs have had recently given their general lack of success in trades (notably Shelby miller and Walker/marte deals). Side note, any chance the horror that has been the Mets defense for the last few years deserves an article? I’m a Mets fan myself meaning I’m biased, but one of my largest issues with how the team is run is a lack of action to address defensive issues. Thank you!
As a DBacks fan I was going to offer some kind of halfway defense, but I really can’t find a single player this year that was a huge win in a trade. Ray was acquired by trade but they gave up Gregorious for him. The DBacks got Corbin and Tyler Skaggs from the Angels for Dan Haren but squandered that trade by turning around and sending Skaggs and Adam Eaton out for Mark Trumbo. At least Corbin has turned out well. Nick Ahmed is the last remaining piece from trading away Justin Upton. Given that Souza, Jay, Diekman, Boxberger are all in their 1st year, it’s kind of hard to judge those. I suppose they won the Miguel Montero for Zack Godley trade but that’s about it.
Yeah, it hasn’t been a great last decade for DBacks’ trades. . . . .thanks for reminding me. 🙂
Eaton went to the White Sox in a separate trade (it escapes me at the moment who they got in return), but it was NOT part of the Angels’ trade for Trumbo (which was ironic to begin with, given that Towers had just gotten rid of all the Trumbo types on the roster over the previous year before that trade).
Don’t forget giving away Touissaint
Jeff says, “No team reaches first place because of one reason alone.” Right — Red Sox are there for 2 reasons. Mookie Betts and Chris Sale.
Joking — lots of reasons for them as well.
And Kimbrel
I think the assumption is that the 21-8 start was the fluke…. That they are 46-47 is more representative of the team
But if you take out the stretch where they went 5-18, they are a 62-37 team. They are 41-29 since the cold stretch. A 95 win pace.
The question is which stat is more representative? Or is where they are- at 67-55- is that where they actually should be right now? This is a team that won 93 games last year and is on pace to win 89 games this year.
If Oakland wins today and tomorrow, there needs to be a column on either why the A’s are in first place or why the Astros are in 2nd place.
Man if LA Dodgers, Washington, and Houston all fail to win their divisions(not to mention the possible Cubs)- this would have got to go down as one of the more unpredictable years ever…..
Cool! Now do the Rockies…