Xander Bogaerts Is Putting the Pieces Together

For a while there, it seemed like the healthy version of Troy Tulowitzki was the best shortstop in baseball. That’s the guy the Blue Jays wanted to trade for, but Tulowitzki has entered a decline period, vacating the positional throne. And now things are kind of complicated. It doesn’t actually matter in any real way who you rank No. 1, among shortstops, but there’s plenty of competition. Last summer, I wondered aloud if Carlos Correa was already deserving of the label. More recently, August suggested it could be Francisco Lindor. There’s probably an argument for Brandon Crawford. There’s definitely an argument for Manny Machado, if you consider him a shortstop. Young shortstop talent is seemingly everywhere, but in Boston, now Xander Bogaerts is making his case. He’s doing so by blending all of his skills.

For Bogaerts, in one way, it hasn’t been smooth. That dreadful slump in 2014 raised several legitimate questions about his future. In another way, this was how it was always going to go. Rookie Bogaerts showed some skills. Sophomore Bogaerts showed different skills. Now the skillsets are being combined, and pitchers are running low on ways to get Bogaerts out.

Prospect Bogaerts was a promising power hitter. And so, to an extent, was rookie Bogaerts. Bogaerts presented himself as a decent threat to put a ball off of or over the Monster, but while that’s good for any hitter, there were clear vulnerabilities. Bogaerts was one of the worst hitters in the league to the opposite field, and when pitchers discovered that weakness, they exploited it. The productivity tanked, and the strikeouts soared.

So Bogaerts underwent a significant transformation. The hitter he was in 2015 bore little resemblance to the hitter he was the year before. Though some power was sacrificed, Bogaerts trimmed his strikeouts by a third, and he introduced himself to right field. He adopted an up-the-middle and opposite-field approach, and he went from batting .218 the other way to .385. One of the worst opposite-field hitters in baseball suddenly became one of the better ones, and that brought Bogaerts to a fork, of sorts. He could, in theory, maintain that approach. Or he could put it all together.

It would appear he’s putting it all together. The Xander Bogaerts in Boston now is still plenty capable of going the other way, but he’s also choosing more moments to turn on the ball. Better yet, there are hints of improved discipline, and the strikeouts haven’t picked up. Bogaerts has shown contact, and discipline, and power, and a spray ability. I’m not even touching on his visibly improved defensive work. (He has visibly improved his defensive work.)

Here’s Bogaerts going the other way, in wRC+:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage
  • 2014: 26
  • 2015: 126
  • 2016: 175

No step back. Actually a step forward! He still doesn’t have power over there, but that’s fine. Here’s Bogaerts pulling the ball, in wRC+:

  • 2014: 178
  • 2015: 147
  • 2016: 263

There’s some authority. And this isn’t just Bogaerts having more success around the field — there’s also the matter of his distribution. Bogaerts over the years, in pull rate:

  • 2014: 47%
  • 2015: 34%
  • 2016: 41%

This year, so far, he’s split the middle. He’s not trying to pull the ball as much as he once did, but he’s choosing his spots, because that’s where the extra-base hits are. Success the other way? Check. Success to the pull side? Check. More balls to the pull side? Check. All that’s left, really, is the difference between strikeouts and walks (K-BB%):

  • 2014: 17%
  • 2015: 11%
  • 2016: 8%

There you go. That’s everything. Maybe this hasn’t been presented in the most visually engaging way, but it’s all simple enough, and it’s plenty telling. It’s taken a few years, but Bogaerts is looking like the player he was supposed to become, back when he was a top prospect. That doesn’t mean this is automatically his new level, now, but this is the most encouraging development yet. This is the strongest sign that Bogaerts is indeed blossoming into a star.

Playing around with a little Statcast data, Bogaerts is hitting the ball harder, relative to last season. That’s true to the pull side, and that’s also true the other way. Bogaerts has always been strong, with quick hands, so I don’t think he’s gotten stronger — I think he’s just gotten more consistent, having found his timing and balance. Here’s a good sign. Last year, he ranked in the 68th percentile in terms of swings at offspeed pitches. This year, he’s down at the 20th percentile. He’s cut that swing rate by 10 points, and what that tells me is that Bogaerts has gotten better at identifying non-fastballs. He doesn’t always get it right, but look at this balance, against a slow curveball from Wednesday:

That followed consecutive fastballs, but Bogaerts was right on the pitch, staying back. That’s a pretty swing. Compare that to this swing against a similar, albeit lower, curveball from 2015:

Bogaerts did come away from that with an RBI double, which is a credit to his wrists. But his balance was worse, and he was out in front. Bogaerts didn’t give himself as much of a chance to see the pitch before committing, and that’s what can lead to worse discipline and worse contact. Again, by and large, Bogaerts last year was an offensive success, but this year he looks more capable. He’s better able to read and react, as opposed to just reacting. He’s therefore better able to turn on the power.

The adaptability is there, and so is the plan, and the plate coverage. Bogaerts now doesn’t have many weak spots, and though it’s a virtual lock that he’s going to end up with fewer singles dropping in, he’s plenty good to survive that regression. Bogaerts is blending his prospect power with his sophomore spray ability and contact. I don’t know what else you could want. That whole Red Sox offense is insane, but don’t let that distract you from what Xander Bogaerts has become.





Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

53 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
BradMember since 2024
10 years ago

I mentioned in the Lindor piece that I thought Xander should be in the conversation for best SS in baseball and got pretty well told that he has no case. I wonder if that’s still true. And again, I even just said conversation, not definitively the best.

FWIW, I’m not a Red Sox fan.

wildcard09
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad

IIRC almost everybody in that thread agreed he was still the 3rd or 4th best, behind Lindor, Correa, and possibly Crawford. Also, the main concern was his lack of power, which he seems like he might have figured out now.

CosmoMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad

I personally think it’s Lindor, I understand where people are coming from when they take Correa’s bat. I think Russell has the “ability” to be in the conversation, though his bat is lagging behind at the moment. I think it’s fair to include Xander as well. I think what hurts his case is that he’s not considered the best fielder or the best hitter, but he’s very good at both.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  Cosmo

If eno is right and peak Russell is a .280/25 hr guy then yes he has a chance. Right now I rate 1) lindor 2) bogey 3) crawford 4) correa 5) Russell 6) seager and then a big drop off to the next tier, although crawford, arcia maybe even Anderson can be up there next year. I think correa and seager will be playing 3b next year though.

JediHoyer
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

I forgot to say I think machado is at short next year and is number 1.

CosmoMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Totally agree that if he’s playing SS, he’s the best.

Darren_Dreadfort
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad

He touched on this again in his chat… I think his rankings are fine but I really don’t see much gap between Lindor/Correa and Seager/Bogaerts. You could make a case for any of those guys besides maybe Seager.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  Brad

I don’t get why people are in such a hurry to declare an answer to a question to which there is undeniably no objective answer. If you declare that Bogaerts isn’t in the conversation, or say it’s impossible to make an argument for him for #1, you’re wrong, plain and simple.

Bogaerts has an incredible amount of talent at a position that is seeing a wonderful infusion of incredible talents. He probably won’t measure up to the Lindors of the world defensively over the next 5+ years, but his offensive upside could be the highest of the group, so counting him out now (he has the highest WAR of any full-time SS this season) or in the medium terms strikes me as odd.

Les Vegetables
10 years ago

I watch Xander almost everyday, and perhaps this is a lazy comp, but he really does remind me of Jeter. Jeter had fantastic control of the strike zone and could spray line drives to all fields. And I think they are similar defensively as well in that they are sure handed but don’t have great range.

jsc1973
10 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

It’s a very valid comparison. You have to be careful about comparing any 23-year-old to a future Hall of Famer, but this is how Jeter started.

Les Vegetables
10 years ago
Reply to  jsc1973

Right, you can’t reasonably say any 23 year old will have a career like Jeter’s. In terms of skillset though they certainly resemble one another.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

People need to learn that comparing a young player with another whose career is over isn’t an attempt to predict that the young guy will match the old guy.

Jeter had a skills profile and a value on a per-year basis. He isn’t among the most talented SSs of all time on a peak skills basis, but one of the things that makes his CAREER so impressive is that he played forever, was almost always healthy, and didn’t see major skills losses as he got older.

The odds of ANYONE doing that, much less a specific player such as Bogaerts, are slim to none, so year, nobody can reasonably predict that Bogaerts will have Jeter’s career. That should go without saying.

Alex87878
10 years ago

Hey everyone, I am trying to get my blog some views, and I would appreciate if any of you would take a look.

https://mlb2016blogs.wordpress.com/2016/05/26/blind-comparisons-may-26th-2016/

Feel free to like, comment, disagree, follow me on twitter, etc. I also provide links to some great baseball sites (including fangraphs) for anybody who is looking for additional resources.

In addition, I AM a Red Sox fan, and I can say that by watching him each day, he is the real deal. Very good hitter, becoming a very good fielder, and improving every day. I think that Correa and Lindor are both definitely up there, but it is definitely an exciting competition in the AL.

redsoxu571
10 years ago

“Bogaerts was one of the worst hitters in the league to the opposite field, and when pitchers discovered that weakness, they exploited it. The productivity tanked, and the strikeouts soared.”

No. No. A thousand times no. I’m quite tired of this false narrative, and people need to get with reality.

When Bogaerts turned into one of the worst hitters in baseball virtually overnight as May became June in 2014, it had little to nothing to do with opposing pitchers adjusting to him. Rather, HE lost his feel at the plate, again virtually overnight. If you watch his at bats from May that year and then July that year, it isn’t the same hitter being attacked differently, but rather a hitter who went from controlling plate appearances to one who was swinging through strikes and failing to recognizes pitches even way out of the zone. You’ve heard it said before that a hitter looks “lost”, and rarely has that label better applied to a player than it did Bogaerts at that time.

I can also say this with confidence because before the slump ended, and all offseason after 2014 (once Bogaerts had regained a feel for the plate and made adjustments in September) I tried to tell it to everyone who would listen. Many insisted that Bogaerts was questionable, but I kept pointing out that he was a player who had handled every level, every stint prior in his career, even in the playoffs against great pitching teams and early in 2014. His utter collapse was on him, and it was obvious, and so it was equally obvious that as long as that was a fluke one-time deal (I still have no idea WHY he lost his feel at the plate) that it was in the past and gone.

Chill
10 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

I believe that Xander’s atrocious 2014 was directly related to his positional change. Midway through that season the Sox moved Xander to 3B to accommodate the signing of Stephan Drew. Xander had always dreamed of being a SS in the majors, not a 3B. He wears #2 because he idolized Jeter growing up. When the then 21 year old Bogaerts got shifted to 3B, a young man was confronted with his life long dream dying and he didn’t handle it well at all. I don’t think that it’s entirely coincidental that Xander’s two best offensive seasons to date have come while he is firmly entrenched at SS.

This is not to say that there aren’t other contributing factors as well. In 2014 Xander was horrific vs. breaking stuff on the outside edge and pitchers destroyed him by pounding the outer half with sliders and cutters. In 2015 Xander clearly adopted an opposite field approach, at the expense of any power, and fixed that hole in his swing about as completely as humanly possible. This season Xander seems to be adding in power by turning on inside pitches while still maintaining an excellent all fields approach.

It has been exciting to see Xander make such successful adjustments at this very early stage in his career. That augurs extremely well for his future. I also think that this is what separates Bogaerts from Correa, Lindor and Seager. None of those youngsters have had to adjust to the league adjusting to them. None of those three have gone through an extended slump and then emerged the better for it. They may well replicate Xander’s success, or they may not. Xander is clearly among the very best SS in the league with as bright a future as any of the other young SS currently taking the league by storm. A new golden age of the SS has begun!

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

Wow, check out the thumbs down trolls who want to deny facts and truth. Losers.

Let me make it statistically clear for you then:
-In 25 April games, Bogaerts hit .278/.387/.378, with a 13/23 BB/K ratio. Pretty good, if low on power
-Over the next 34 games (to June 7th), Bogaerts hit .313/.388/.504, with a 12/34 BB/K ratio. The BB rate dropped, but he was making adjustments and improvements, and showing the exact kind of talent expected
-Over the NEXT FOUR GAMES, coming off of a 17-for-44 stretch, Bogaerts went 0-for-16. Then he hit 9-for-84. Over that entire stretch, from June 8th to July 11th, Bogaerts hit .090/.124/.120, with a 4/31 BB/K. Wow, that’s quite the adjustment by opposing pitchers, he says sarcastically
-To build on what Chill said, guess what happened at the start of this stretch? Bogaerts was playing just his SIXTH straight game at 3B. It might be a case of correlation-but-not-causation, but almost as soon as Bogaerts was moved, he went from an .840 OPS hitter with strong plate discipline and some emerging power to THE WORST HITTER IN BASEBALL. OVERNIGHT. And it was all in HIS head.

If you thumbs me down, you’re either a troll or an idiot. The facts are there, plain as day, and if you WATCHED the games instead of just looking at season totals you would have seen two different hitters here. It was Bogaerts who changed, not the pitchers. Fact. Period. End of story.

I also tried to urge people to see that Bogaerts wasn’t a steady .240/.297/.362 hitter for 2014 (which MANY people treated him as), but rather a player who was very good through May before COMPLETELY LOSING HIS WAY for three months, before getting it back (with a new approach at the plate, based more on contact than working counts) in September. And yet people just weren’t interested in the truth, as apparently some of you aren’t now. Fine, be that way.

But the fact remains that Bogaerts has been successful for every portion of every season his entire professional career (minors and majors)…except for that one stretch in 2014. Not all of 2014…just that three month stretch. And it is as clear as anything that it was on Bogaerts going wrong, not pitchers exploiting pre-existing flaws.

London Yank
10 years ago

I was going to note that a .400 BABIP doesn’t hurt as well. But have a look at the Red Sox lineup. The entire lineup is running an incredible BABIP. How are they doing it?!

Blinzler
10 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

Hitting to all fields, at least that’s the narrative of the Boston media. But I think that’s definetly a reason.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Blinzler

Cmon, be serious. They’re 1.5% above the league average in hitting to the opposite field but more than 50 points above the league average in babip. They’re just getting incredibly lucky.

redsoxu571
10 years ago

There is probably something more to it than just pure luck, though I don’t know what that could be.

It’s worth noting that there was a near team-wide BABIP failure in the earlier portion of 2015, so this group has succeeded/struggled together before. I’d think the most likely explanation is that when things are going right for a lineup, it makes opposing pitchers worse in-game, and so “improves” the performance of ALL hitters (and likewise, if a few key guys are struggling it perhaps makes sequencing harder to pull off, and so keeps opposing pitchers more on their game and so makes the entire lineup worse).

I think baseball is at least a bit more dynamic than we think it is, between the above possibilities and even just from the emotional/mental standing of a team.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

They do have more infield hits than the average, that’s a skill. But it can’t come close to accounting for 50 points in babip.

John DiFool2
10 years ago
Reply to  London Yank

They’ve just been relentlessly punishing mistakes.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  John DiFool2

Lol

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

Hard to miss the fact that his BABIP is .400 in spite of the fact that he doesn’t have peripherals which suggest he should be much above average (20.1% ld, 9.8% iffb, 7.0% ifh). The obvious conclusion is that he’s simply getting incredibly lucky (same is true of many Red Sox ( Bradley (.390), Shaw (.383), and Ramirez (.369) (Young is also very high, at .378, but at least he has a high ld%)). Bogaerts has a Hard of 31.9% (10th among SSs), 0 Defensive Runs Saved (average, tied with many), 8.0% BBs (10th among SSs), 16.0% Ks (12th among SSs). The only thing he seems to be among the SS leaders in is getting lucky.

Blinzler
10 years ago

That seems overly simplistic to me. He’s hitting the ball to all fields, so there is no shifting. He seems to be able to put the ball in play where defenders don’t get it, it was the same last year. He obviously shows progression, the above article shows that.

Not mentioned here is his very good baserunning.
But well, I guess he doesn’t play for the Giants…

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Blinzler

In terms of hitting the ball to the opposite field he’s 15th among shortstops, dead average. In terms of ubr he’s 10th. You should at least check some statistics before making claims like that, it doesn’t take long. Evidently he got lucky last year too, he didn’t the year before. Putting the ball in play where defenders dont get it for part of one’s career is what’s known as luck. And the giants have a young infielderwith an even higher babip this year, kelby tomlinson, and i freely admit that he’s getting incredibly lucky.

Blinzler
10 years ago

Buddy, all which I wrote fits the narrative. Just check the article above. He doesn’t have to lead a single stat to hit well, he has to be balanced, which he is right now. He’s not David Ortiz, who crushes the ball and not even Mookie Betts. But he has shown now for more than a year that he’s able to get his hits. He’s walking more. And he’s hitting for more power. Is he getting lucky? Maybe, I won’t deny there’s a great possibility for that.

Can his success be entirely explained by luck (which seems to be your claim)? I highly doubt that. But believe what you want to believe.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Blinzler

It isn’t even a question of not leading in a single stat. He isn’t even higher than 10th in a single stat except those related to luck (babip and things related to it). He’s average or a little above average in everything. That makes him average or a little above average.

Jonah Pemstein
10 years ago

That’s pretty harsh on someone who’s accumulated 7 WAR since the start of last year – more than anybody on the Giants!

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Jonah Pemstein

Getting lucky on hits is why he has a high war, obviously. And what do the giants have to do with this??

JediHoyer
10 years ago

He consistently ran high babips in the minors, sometimes it’s just a skill. The last 3 yrs miguel Cabrera has a babip of .365. Do I think a .400 is sustainable? No but .350 or more is certainly possible as a baseline.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

It”s a skill when it’s supported by peripherals, when it isn’t, as in the case of bogaerts, it’s just luck. Remember a few months ago you were trying to claim that bryant’s 380 babip last year was a skill? Well now it’s down to 310, what do you think about that? Of course bryant has radically cut his k% and raised his ld%, so he really is a much better hitter than he was last year, but his luck has returned to earth and the same thing is going to happen to bogaerts.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

Because Bryant is hitting more homers. Homers are a 0 to babip

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  JediHoyer

Oh come on, your math is better than that, isn’t it? If bryant were hitting homers at the same rate at last year, 4.0% of pas rather than 4.9%, his babip would be .321, nowhere close to .378.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

And u are using what 30% the sample size?

Chill
10 years ago

So a solid defensive SS who hits .320 and accumulates nearly 200 hits as a 22 year old is “average” or a “little above average”? Um. Ok.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Chill

Without his babip luck he’s hititing about .260. Sure it’s imprsseive that he’s a little above average at such a young age but this is about he’s already one of the best.

Darren_Dreadfort
10 years ago

Why 260? Show your work.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

His babip is 100 points over the league average with no peripherals to support it. Subtract the ks and that means a normal babip would give him a batting average more than 80 points lower. So let’s say he should be hitting 240, i was being generous.

JediHoyer
10 years ago

What peripherals are you suggesting lead to high babips? He has a high grounder rate, not many flyballs, not much soft contact, has some speed, and has the green monster at his advantage. That’s a recipe for a high babip.

WorldSeries
10 years ago

At some point the high BABIP for Xander starts to look like a skill. He had a .372 over all of last season, and is a better hitter this year. Of course no hitter will maintain a .400 BABIP but his is probably due to fall less than you’d think. Further, you’re cherry picking stats to make your argument, listing DRS and not UZR, where Xander rates better, and not listing other areas where he’s improved in ISO (where he rates better than Lindor, Correa and Russel among others). He’s also an excellent baserunner.

Also simplifying BABIP to say hitters are lucky is foolish, some of it may be, but Bradley for example hasn’t been lucky as much as he’s been really freaking good. It will decline, but that doesn’t mean it’s all luck so far.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  WorldSeries

A skill based on what? You tell me. And at least go and check stats vs the other 29 shortstops like i did before throwing out claims. We aren’t even close to the point where we can say it’s a skill. Let’s have this talk again about how many of the red sox are getting lucky in a year, okay? And if you’re going to say he’s one of the best, it doesn’t count to say he’s ‘improved’. You have to compare him to the other shortstops, not himself.

Darren_Dreadfort
10 years ago

Stupid talking point

Bogaerts: 8% BB/ 16% k/ 160 ISO
Correa: 11/26/160
Lindor: 7.6/13.7/.95
Seager: 7.8/15.7/188
Russell: 12/24/147

Reduce his Babip to whatever you want and hes still in the conversation for best SS.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

Compare to all 29 others

johnforthegiants
10 years ago

And come on, iso?? He plays half his games in fenway. Be serious.

Darren_Dreadfort
10 years ago

Great stuff here, John.

Chill
10 years ago

We get it Johnny. You don’t like Bogaerts. Understood. For my part I’ll take a silver slugger award winning gold glove finalist SS who accomplished what Xander did at the age of 22!
The 2015 season showed that Bogaerts was capable of making adjustments on both sides of the ball and succeeding as a stand out major league SS. To date the 2016 season has only reinforced the impression that Xander is still growing and improving and that his ceiling remains huge. He is not only already a top 5 SS in the league, he is getting demonstrably better right before our eyes. If you want to close your eyes and yammer on about BABIP luck and home field advantage and all the rest, by all means do so. You will only be depriving yourself of the opportunity to witness the continuing maturation of an already wonderful ballplayer.

LHPSU
10 years ago

Are you aware that comparing Bogaerts to all 29 other starting shortstops rather than just 4 of the best is simply going to look even more favorable for Bogaerts?

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

I’m pointing out that in all of the statistics not related to luck which i’ve pointed out here, bogaerts is not rated higher than #10 out of the 30 major league shortstops, and no one here has presented a single such statistic in which he does rate higher than #10. Not one.

Chill
10 years ago

Bogaerts is in the top 4 in BA,OBP,SLG,OPS,wOBA and wRC+ among MLB SS. But I guess that’s all luck. Xander has been running a BABIP north of .370 for nearly a season and a half now. When does this change from luck to a skill? Or should Xander run out to buy lotto tickets forthwith?
You seem to be caught in the gap between what has happened and what “should” have happened. What is happening vs what “will” happen. Xander Bogaerts is one the very best SS in the majors right now. There’s little reason to think that’s going to change anytime soon. If you want to argue that a season and a half of sustained excellence is fueled entirely by luck, have at it. I’m quite sure that Bogaerts and all those who enjoy watching him play would respond that it is far better to be lucky than good.

GreggMember since 2016
10 years ago

As the article and others have pointed out, the Bogaerts very much resembles Jeter as a hitter.

Until his last few years, Jeter’s BABIP averaged over .365, with five seasons over .375, and one season at .396. Maintaining a high BABIP can be done.

In over 1500 major league plate appearances Xander’s BABIP is .347 — including the horrendous slump of 2014. This is not small sample size. Yes, it is likely to drop from .400. But I would expect the drop to be modest, certainly not reducing him to anything near an average hitter as some have maintained.

johnforthegiants
10 years ago
Reply to  Gregg

Bogaerts is very different from Jeter in that he hits a lot more infield flies than Jeter did (31.3% fb x 10.6% iff = 3.32% infield fly % vs. 21.4% fb% x 2.7% iff = 0.58% infield fly %), that’s 27 points lower BABIP for Bogaerts right there. And Jeter was a much better spray hitter than Bogaerts (33/34/33 vs. 40/34/26).

Chill
10 years ago

Hey Xander just lucked into another homerun! A laser to left off of Stroman. He’s also lucked into having the highest fielding percentage of any SS in baseball. Meaningless stats I know. Bogaerts is just an average SS who’s getting lucky. For a year and a half and counting…