ZiPS Time Warp: What Could a Healthy Byron Buxton Do?

Every year, Byron Buxton seems to find another gear. With the exception of his abbreviated 2018 (94 plate appearances in the majors), Buxton’s OPS has increased every single season compared to the year before. In 2022, partly thanks to becoming a fastball-crushing machine since the start of last year, he’s continued this pattern, hitting .278/.342/.722 in 79 plate appearances (all stats are through Monday’s action). He’s even tied for the league lead in home runs with nine, especially impressive given that he’s missed more than a third of Minnesota’s games.
It’s that last fact that is troubling, as Buxton’s career has been hampered by an unfortunate inability to stay healthy. And it hasn’t been one, consistent problem that keeps him out of games but rather a succession of nagging ones, with each season bringing a mystery grab bag of misfortune. This year, it’s been a sore knee from a slide, a hand contusion, and a hip problem. Last year, it was a hip, a hamstring, and a broken hand. Before 2021, he missed time due to a concussion, a sore left shoulder, a sprained left foot, a torn labrum, another concussion, a hit by a pitch to the wrist, a different strain to the same wrist, a broken toe, serious migraines after an outfield wall collision, a strained groin, and a sprained knee — and that doesn’t count the myriad day-to-day issues.
The last time Buxton played even 100 games in a season was in 2017 (while there were only 60 games in 2020, he still missed a third of them). I was born in 1978; growing up, Eric Davis was the five-tool, mega-skilled exemplar of the dynamic superstar who couldn’t stay healthy, but even he still managed to get into 130 games a year during his 1986–90 peak. Buxton debuted almost seven years ago, in June 2015, and barely has three years’ worth of playing time in the majors to go along with another half-season in the minors due to Minnesota’s early proclivity for demoting him every time he fell into a slump.
It’s hard to state with any kind of certainty how his development has been hindered by his injuries, but the Buxton we’ve gotten has still had a dynamite career. As his offense has continually improved, his top-tier defense in center has remained. Looking at center fielders with at least 1,000 plate appearances through age 28, he ranks very highly per 600 plate appearances:
| Name | WAR |
|---|---|
| Mike Trout | 8.0 |
| Ty Cobb | 7.9 |
| Mickey Mantle | 7.4 |
| Willie Mays | 7.3 |
| Tris Speaker | 7.2 |
| Joe DiMaggio | 7.1 |
| Ken Griffey Jr. | 6.4 |
| Benny Kauff | 6.3 |
| Larry Doby | 5.8 |
| Kenny Lofton | 5.7 |
| Al Simmons | 5.6 |
| Andruw Jones | 5.5 |
| Andrew McCutchen | 5.5 |
| Duke Snider | 5.4 |
| Fred Lynn | 5.2 |
| Pete Reiser | 5.0 |
| Byron Buxton | 5.0 |
| Andre Dawson | 5.0 |
| Eric Davis | 4.9 |
| Wally Berger | 4.9 |
By my count, 10 of those 20 are Hall of Famers, with Trout a lock (and in my opinion, Lofton and Jones should have already been inducted). All but two of the others had long, illustrious careers, with one outlier being Kauff, who was banned by commissioner Landis after being arrested (and quickly acquitted) for car theft and for links to the Black Sox. The other, Reiser, is the one who makes me wince. He was injury-prone and had a penchant for crashing into walls, most notably in 1947, when he suffered a particularly bad concussion. He was also a phenomenally talented young player, almost winning the sabermetric Triple Crown (BA/OBP/SLG) in 1942; he was a .322/.382/.496 hitter by the time he headed off to World War II at 23.
For a healthy player of Buxton’s talents and performance, the seven-year, $100 million contract extension he signed back in November would seem like an almost a ludicrous underpay. But ZiPS projected Buxton at seven years and $124 million because it expected him to average under 300 plate appearances per year over the new deal. And unfortunately, missing a lot of time due to injury does predict future playing time missed to injury.
Since it isn’t one event that has prevented Buxton from reaching his potential, we’re going to have to give the ZiPS Time Machine a heavy workload as it jumps into recent history to prevent his injuries. As we’re using fictional technology anyway, I’m also assuming we can magically force the Twins not to demote him, so I started by adding translations of his minor league performances beginning in 2015. Then, for every trip to the IL, I inserted projections from the point at which he missed time. Once Buxton hit 140 games in any given season (52 for 2020 and 25 for this year), I stopped adding any additional projections, as I don’t want to be too greedy. I then ran his rest-of-career projection starting from Tuesday morning:
| Year | BA | OBP | SLG | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SB | OPS+ | DR | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | .271 | .327 | .410 | 520 | 64 | 141 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 48 | 42 | 22 | 100 | 13 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | .240 | .295 | .440 | 491 | 75 | 118 | 28 | 8 | 18 | 70 | 34 | 15 | 97 | 14 | 2.7 |
| 2017 | .257 | .318 | .426 | 474 | 72 | 122 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 55 | 39 | 29 | 95 | 22 | 4.1 |
| 2018 | .224 | .276 | .379 | 491 | 62 | 110 | 24 | 5 | 14 | 52 | 31 | 21 | 76 | 12 | 1.6 |
| 2019 | .251 | .304 | .459 | 455 | 73 | 114 | 38 | 6 | 15 | 67 | 32 | 22 | 100 | 16 | 3.9 |
| 2020 | .254 | .276 | .549 | 173 | 26 | 44 | 6 | 0 | 15 | 33 | 5 | 4 | 117 | 4 | 1.3 |
| 2021 | .280 | .327 | .569 | 496 | 90 | 139 | 37 | 2 | 34 | 75 | 27 | 20 | 140 | 13 | 6.1 |
| 2022 | .271 | .317 | .582 | 499 | 91 | 135 | 36 | 2 | 39 | 91 | 26 | 16 | 149 | 12 | 6.2 |
| 2023 | .265 | .308 | .534 | 509 | 85 | 135 | 34 | 2 | 33 | 90 | 26 | 16 | 131 | 11 | 4.8 |
| 2024 | .265 | .310 | .549 | 475 | 80 | 126 | 32 | 2 | 33 | 86 | 25 | 14 | 135 | 10 | 4.7 |
| 2025 | .263 | .306 | .540 | 463 | 77 | 122 | 31 | 2 | 31 | 82 | 24 | 15 | 132 | 10 | 4.4 |
| 2026 | .261 | .304 | .521 | 445 | 72 | 116 | 28 | 2 | 28 | 75 | 23 | 12 | 126 | 10 | 3.9 |
| 2027 | .255 | .298 | .495 | 424 | 65 | 108 | 26 | 2 | 24 | 68 | 21 | 11 | 118 | 9 | 3.3 |
| 2028 | .251 | .293 | .469 | 399 | 58 | 100 | 23 | 2 | 20 | 59 | 19 | 9 | 110 | 8 | 2.6 |
| 2029 | .243 | .282 | .444 | 374 | 51 | 91 | 20 | 2 | 17 | 51 | 16 | 8 | 100 | 8 | 1.9 |
| 2030 | .236 | .274 | .403 | 347 | 44 | 82 | 17 | 1 | 13 | 42 | 14 | 6 | 88 | 7 | 1.2 |
| 2031 | .228 | .260 | .371 | 259 | 31 | 59 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 28 | 9 | 4 | 75 | 5 | 0.4 |
| 2032 | .217 | .248 | .344 | 157 | 17 | 34 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 65 | 2 | 0.0 |
| Total | .254 | .301 | .478 | 7451 | 1133 | 1896 | 429 | 55 | 376 | 1087 | 418 | 246 | 111 | 185 | 55.2 |
ZiPS doesn’t assume that this healthier Buxton will continue to play 140 games forever, giving him the usual decline path we’ve come to expect throughout his 30s; it only has him playing 140 games in one additional season past this year. But with around 8,000 plate appearances, this healthier Buxton gets within shouting distance of Hall of Fame territory, hitting nearly 400 homers and finishing with 55 WAR.
Does that get him into Cooperstown? That’s a tricky question. Andruw Jones, another star in center field with a shortened career, has numbers that are a bit better, but his most recent Hall vote tally was 41% in his fifth season on the ballot. That said, he may make the Hall, and if he doesn’t get there on the BBWAA ballot, I would guess that he’d fare better with future voters than today’s.
There are reasons to think Buxton could be even better than this, too. Without the constant missed time, would he have better plate discipline than he does today? Would he have figured fastballs out faster? Would his Gold Glove in center field be even more valuable metal? These things are difficult to pinpoint, but the possibility at least exists.
When healthy, Buxton has been one of the best center fielders around. If fortune smiles on him and we get a healthier version of him in his next seven years than his first seven, he and the Twins — and baseball fans — will benefit immensely.
Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.
This is probably just because it’s recent but for some reason this Time Warp seems even more alien to me than the ones before. Healthy Byron Buxton breaks my brain.
Here’s one I would find even more intriguing–what if you went back and just gave him 600 PAs at the same rate stats every year starting in 2019? All the way up to now. I guess in 2020 you’d want to make it 200 PAs or whatever a full season was that year.
For example: If you prorated out Buxton’s 2019, you’d have a guy with about 25 Def value and 20 home runs.
In 2020, if you put him out to 205 PAs he’d have something like 20 home runs and 2.3 Def.
In 2021, if you put him out to 600 PAs he’d have 45 home runs and about 14.9 DEF.
And then in 2022, if you prorated him out to 100 PAs, he’d have 11 home runs and 2.9 Def.
What would ZiPs project his final line would be in 2022? And what would the rest of the career be projected to look like? It would be a guy who basically had no track record (or a bad one) up until 2019, but who would have played gold glove defense in CF in 2019 and 2021, close to leading the league in homers in 2020 and 2021, and who would be both leading the league in homers and playing the best defensive center field to start this year.
What would the projections on that guy be like?
“By my count, 10 of those 20 are Hall of Famers, with Trout a lock”
My problem with that analysis is that most of those players were better than Buxton – in many cases a LOT better. Would be far better to look at players who are +/- 0.5 WAR relative to Buxton. Framing it the way this article does makes Buxton look a lot better than he was.
For the record, the projection is based off of similars, not similar-or-betters. In any case, four of the next 10 after Buxton were HoFers (Dawson, Roush, Hack Wilson, Bresnahan given the position cutoffs I used of top two positions if no position was at 50%).
Not really sure what you mean by “the projection is based off of similars”. I’m looking at the first table which isn’t projections, it’s actual data. And many of the players on that table simply aren’t similar to Buxton. Trout is +3.0 WAR per 600 PAs, Cobb is +2.9., etc.
The first table isn’t similars, it is just the best centerfielders per PA.
There is no sense using WAR in this context. You have some pretty good defensive data on Joltin Joe? I will say that modern data for 2022 isn’t worth a lot. Beyond a certain point you are comparing pineapples to apples. You can’t both celebrate how great modern analysis is without condemning the data from just a few years ago. Like many progressive sets of ideals, it destroys itself on an increasingly shortening timeline.There is no accurate way to compare historic data and if there were contemporary metrics would be the least appropriate. You are applying a subjective modern filter to a previous era. Half of what goes into WAR is trash and the weights are all arbitrary IMO. I think that you should just use offense with no base-running, that is the best you will ever be able to do. At least you won’t be using made-up numbers. On that note, you should display the back-of-a-baseball-card stats. A single number like WAR is only useful to a person that can’t interpret anything more complex than a sorted list. I get that people like lists.
Isn’t the whole point of a ZIPS Time Warp to play “what if?” and make a player look better than he really was?
Again, I’m not talking about the time warp part of the article. I’m talking about the first table and the sentence that follows. Which is based on actual data.
Your objection is just that you want the top 5-10 names off the table removed? That should be pretty easily do-able for you in the html, and then the rest of us can enjoy having more context.
This.
The top 7 in WAR/600PA are all HoFers with Griffey Jr. the lowest at 6.4WAR/600PA.
These players have little similarity
Among the next 13, only 3 are HoFers.
McCutchen is an interesting recent comp.
He was great during his prime but still unlikely to make Cooperstown by BBWAA.
And I don’t think ZiPS-projected healthy Buxton has a stronger case than McCutchen.
Yeah this happens to be a pet peeve of mine. I see it a lot, particularly in HOF discussions. A comparison is made but only to players who were better than Player X on a particular metric. That’s not how to do a comparison. You need to compare players who were similar to Player X on a particular metric.
This is awesome, it’s something I think about often regarding Buxton, i.e., the “what if he didn’t get injured” scenarios. Hopefully he gets 500 at-bats this year.
It’s hard to say how high his ceiling could be if not injured, but these numbers definitely feel too low in the stolen bases column.
He’s a phenomenal base stealer too at 87%
As long as Dan mentioned Eric Davis (who kindly has his own time warp article, and which I missed which makes me sad!), it’s worth noting that Eric Davis has a very different set of tools than Buxton. Eric Davis had something like a 65 hit, 70 raw power (and probably 65 game power), 50 field, and 80 speed. Part of what made him so amazing wasn’t just that he had 70 raw power and 80 speed, it’s that he was also pretty good at working the count. But he wasn’t exactly a plus fielder either (he wasn’t really much of a negative out there until injuries took hold, either).
Buxton is a different guy altogether. He’s also probably a 70 raw power and 80 speed, but the hit tool is both obviously below average and the swing 100% sold out for power. He’s out there with a K-rate that is six times his walk rate, but with 45-55 HR power on a rate basis (which is an 80 in game power). The hit tool is something like 40, although you could in theory argue it is even lower. He’s also probably a 70 grade defender in CF.
So despite having similar speed / raw power grades, Eric Davis was pretty refined at the plate and would have been something like “Darryl Strawberry who runs like Tim Raines.” He would have been great in a conventional way, like Ray Lankford but 25-30% better at everything on offense. Buxton is very different, a one-dimensional masher at the plate like we’ve never seen before in major league history–like the game power of Willie Stargell or Mike Schmidt (an ISO+ on 200) but with Hernan Perez’s ability to control the strike zone. (Buxton is also a better defender than Davis, FWIW).
Also, Eric Davis has more or less the worst list of health problems of any player who didn’t literally die or become permanently disabled because of injuries on the field. The conventional stuff is bad enough, it makes him the 99th percentile of most injured players of all time. But in addition to that, he suffered a lacerated spleen on the field (I will never, ever forget watching that play, it was horrific) and also beat cancer during his playing career. Let’s hope that Byron Buxton doesn’t have to deal with that.
He reminds me a lot of prime Carlos Gomez.
Luis Robert has a lot of the same tools as Buxton (less game power), but has already started to improve his plate discipline dramatically. I wonder if he’s going to end up as a good example of what Buxton could have been without the injuries (assuming Robert doesn’t keep getting injured).
The thing about Carlos Gomez is that there are a bunch of guys who have had flashes like that, but it’s very hard to sustain. Eventually they get better at controlling the strike zone (like Luis Robert might be doing) to get better and eventually guard against declining athleticism, or they can’t keep it up.
Also, Buxton is almost certainly a better athlete than either Gomez or Robert. Which is really saying something because Gomez and Robert are (or were) 70 runners with plus raw power. Buxton’s in the same class as Trea Turner. Statcast his him with a 4.01 HP to 1B speed.
One other imperfect comp I’ll throw out there is Elijah Green, the massively hyped prep CF who is draft eligible next year (I guess that could describe Druw Jones too). Eric hangs an 80 future raw power and 70 speed on him, as well as a future 30 hit tool. That’s not exactly the same as Buxton, who is faster but doesn’t have as much raw power. But it’s a similar story with a guy who has such insane tools except for the hit tool. Bo Jackson too.
Robert is probably a better athlete than Buxton. From what I can find Robert ran a 6.2 60/yrd dash and Buxton a 6.6 60/yrd dash back in the day. Robert has also significantly bulked up in recent years. If listed weights are correct Robert currently has a 30 lb advantage.
How is an extra 30lb an advantage if Buxton is hitting 450 foot HRs? What would additional bulk gain him?
If you look at Statcast’s Sprint Speed from 2020 to 2022, with a minimum of 100 competitive runs, Buxton is #2 with 30.0 (ft/sec) behind Turner’s 30.5. He also has the fastest home to first time–a bonkers 4.01 (Turner is a full tenth behind him). Luis Robert is fast too, but he’s 73rd on sprint speed and 93rd on home to first. He’s fast like Daulton Varsho is fast.
In terms of exit velocity (which is how you measure raw power), from 2020 to 2022 (minimum: 300 PAs), the max exit velocity is mostly guys you would expect: Stanton, Judge, Alonso, Ohtani. And Machado, which kind of surprised me (maybe it shouldn’t). Luis Robert is ninth; Buxton is 40th. If you look at average exit velocity, Buxton is 12th and Robert is 101st. Ideally we’d have something in between the average of everything and the max exit velocity–average of Top 10, maybe? to capture raw power. I’m calling it a draw but if there’s a better measure like average of the Top 10 I’d take that more seriously than my guess here.
I don’t think you can use prior 60 times. But I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that Buxton is faster then Robert
My biggest takeaway from this wall of text is that you missed a Fangraphs article. Holy cow!
Lemme see when that was published…April 22, 2020. Hm, I don’t have any memory of that time. What was happening then? Was there anything happening then that might have disrupted my life?
Haha. Just giving you a gentle ribbing, that’s all. I appreciate your commentary.
Edit: oh god autocorrect said “rubbing” instead of ribbing
Yeah, that was supposed to be humorous. I remember in early February 2020, someone told me I needed to do a better job enjoying myself and having fun, that I no longer needed to be in survival mode all the time. I had made it through the gauntlet (several gauntlets, actually–with health, family, and work all at the same time), and come out on the other end in pretty good shape. You probably know how this one ends.
Well I’m hoping things have improved for you! And I’m hoping FG has given you a semblance of sanity through these tough times.
If Buxton isn’t an 80 grade CF then no one is.
In exactly 80 games over the last 2 seasons, he’s hit. .300/.354/.664 with 28 HRs. That’s insanity
Poor Grady Sizemore.
Played 4 full seasons(age 22-25) where he accumulated 27.3 WAR and couldn’t even make Dan’s best CF under 28 list.
Injuries suck.
He was in the next 10 – Hack Wilson, Roush, Dykstra, Bresnahan, Cedeno, Sizemore, Reggie Smith, Lemon, Holmes, Jimmie Hall.
Buxton seems like one of those guys who’re just too explosive for their bodies to handle. I’d love to know how much force he generates when he starts moving.
Bo Jackson seemed like a good comp in a lot of ways.
Perhaps for a comp on explosiveness, but Bo was absolutely built for power generation. The hip degeneration was caused by blunt force trauma when his leg was planted. Only Bo knows whether he’d have held up otherwise but I suspect so.
I’ve thought about this ever since Mike Trout started having all those little injuries. Giancarlo Stanton and Aaron Judge and Joey Gallo all have some of this too. I think there’s something to the idea that some guys are so strong and so fast that when they go all out they pull muscles, break bones, etc.
You just listed a bunch of man-children. Being a grown-man at 20 is really exciting when you get called up but it is a curse pretty soon after. Can you imagine the stress on developing joints and ligaments? Late-bloomers are generally the all-time greats, not the kids that can pass for a 30 y/o. I am sure there are exceptions. I have never met anyone taller than 6’2″ that doesn’t constantly complain about everything being painful, but I am also older than 25 so there is that to consider.
Strength and athleticism absolutely play a role in getting hurt. They generate more torque and put more strss on every joint in their body. Its a simple fact. You ever see an 8 y/o tear an ACL?
To be fair, if you’re as good as Mike Trout, you’re pretty much guaranteed to be an all-time great even if you start getting weird little injuries at 25. Unfortunately for everyone else, they’re not as good as Mike Trout.
Oh, there’s absolutely something to it. Building muscle is done by micro-tears during usage, but connective tissue doesn’t heal the same if you damage it.
This. Reality sucks sometimes.
He is not. They couldn’t be built much more differently. I do’nt think their skillets are similar either. There was also this thing where Bo played football!
Looks like only 2021 and 2022 are MVP candidate worthy and HOF candidacy would depend on postseason and off field positive character things. Fred Lynn and Andrew McCutchen both were much worse after 30. Also I’d never heard of Jimmie Hall. Thank you.
Did you know Mike Trout was awesome? I did. I didn’t realize through age 28 he was the best CF ever. Look at that list. Cobb, Mantle, Mays, Speaker, DiMaggio, Griffey. And he’s THE BEST.
This is an arbitrary metric.I think Trout is great but I am very skeptial that he is better than Willie Mays. How is this exercise not disrespectful to the greats that came before him? He isn’t better than them. The fact that he gets to legitimately be mentionined in the same sentence is an honor. Writing it in caps doesn’t make it any more true.
“How is this exercise not disrespectful to the greats that came before him?”
Being better than someone at something, and being noted as such, is not “disrespectful.” Peyton Manning was not disrespectful when he passed Dan Marino in passing yards, nor was Brees when he passed Manning, nor was Brady when he passed Brees.
Saying Mark Kotsay or Michael Bourn was better than Willie Mays – maybe that’s disrespectful, but more so it’s just demonstrably wrong.
Saying ‘Trout is the best CF ever through age 28’ is kind of selling him short.
Trout was the best player ever in terms of accumulated WAR by age 27.
Trout’s all time rank of fWAR through age X
20: 2nd
21: 1st
22: 1st
23: 1st
24: 2nd
25: 2nd
26: 2nd
27: 1st
28: 4th (Pandemic-shortened 2020)
29: 7th (injured in 2021)
It seems very unlikely that Trout stays healthy and keeps up what he is doing…but then again everything that Trout does seems extraordinary. You can tell he spends a lot of time working in the offseason on his weaknesses (like OF jump for example, which he says he learned from Twitter). Can you imagine if he keeps this up? I mean he is signed through 2030….what if he was good enough to resign after that? Tiny shot at all time greatest player.
i dont follow the twins much. how often if at all do they DH buxton? I feel like theres no reason he shouldn’t DH once or twice a week, if just to reduce the odds of something happening
What he does best is defense. Not letting him do what he does best is pretty criminal IMO. A world-class running around the outfield is hardly reckless. Trust me, he will get dinged up either way. He is just one of those guys and it is also part of hat makes him great. if they really want to decrease the odds of something bad happening then they could just tell him to stay home everyday.
Or tell him that under no circumstances should he ever run into a wall again. Bryce Harper learned it for the year before his free agency; I’m sure Buxton could also.
Buxton has been DH-ing about 1-2 times per week this season. Before this year, virtually never, though they would give him about 1 day off per week.
There is no such thing as a healthy Byron Buxton. Buxton is completely reckless in the outfield and the injuries are a byproduct of the extreme athleticism. You might as well wonder what a way more athletic Vlad Jr would be. Don’t forget how terrible Buxton was at hitting early on in his career. I think that all of the downtime is what has made him a better hitter. If he just got everyday at bats and the perpetual starting gig, then his offense probably never would have gotten to this point. He was so lost for the first few years of his career – those injuries were a bit of a blessing.
You’re not exactly becoming a better baseball player when you’re injured. You’re becoming a healthier baseball player.
I would expect Andruw Jones to fare worse with future voters than today’s voters. His only argument is based on defense and future people will only devalue our contemporary metrics. We are in peak stupidity for defense. The way that we currently value and deploy defense can’t get any worse unless there are some major rule changes. Granted, the MLB strategy does seem to be slow-pitch softball rules so I guess a tenth defender is next. Maybe if you hit a line drive at the pitcher you are out. Barring anything like that, I expect that defense will at some point trend back towards being less embarrassing. In that scenario, they will throw out all of this contemporary data.
Beyond that, there are a truckload of great CF from that era. Andruw Jones had his day when he was just a kid on that Braves team in the WS but he doesn’t belong in the HOF before a ton of other guys. Kenny Lofton, Jim Edmonds, Carlos Beltran, Lance Berkman are just a few cool CF from that era that I can think of in 60 seconds.
I definitely think we need to see this done with a healthy Byron Buxton. With luck, we’ll get a real and actual healthy Byron Buxton on the field for at least a handful of seasons, but what we could get sooner is a ZIPS time warp iteration that conveniently forgets that Buxton’s been injury-prone on an Eric Davis scale.
Gotta mention Benny Kauff on that list too, if Mike Trout was never born he has the greatest rookie season by a hitter ever
Great article and nice reference with Eric Davis.
My version of this article:
We’ll never know.
As ALWAYS in professional sports: The best ability is availability.
🎶 He’d make a plan and he’d see it through / that’s what a healthy Buxton’d do 🎶