2020 ZiPS Projections: Los Angeles Dodgers

After having typically appeared in the hallowed pages of Baseball Think Factory, Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections have now been released at FanGraphs for eight years. The exercise continues this offseason. Below are the projections for the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Batters

Looking at the hitting projections, it’s not hard to see why the Dodgers didn’t go all-out to sign Anthony Rendon. Rendon, of course, would be an upgrade for any team, but it’s difficult to see how the Dodgers would have gotten maximum benefit. Their worst projected position is right field, manned primarily by Alex Verdugo, and with his projected WAR of 2.0 in 476 plate appearances, even he falls into the above-average category. And it’s possible that WAR slightly underrates the Dodger lineup simply because positional versatility is one of those things that we foggily know is meaningful, though exactly how meaningful we don’t quite know.

ZiPS has been keen on Cody Bellinger for a while. Indeed, this is quite an aggressive win projection for a first baseman. Bellinger’s career home run projection has gone well past 500 at this point, and ZiPS is even baking in a mildish drop in league home run totals, which we don’t know will actually happen.

Gavin Lux’s long-term projection remains bananas and his presence gives the Dodgers a tremendous amount of flexibility in the trade market. The Dodgers could actually trade someone like Corey Seager without creating a giant crater in their lineup, assuming they had a partner with an extra starting pitcher who could make it worth it (Noah Syndergaard?).

The riskiest projection is Will Smith’s, whose emergence is still quite recent. Catchers tend to have odd, disappointing growth curves, so ZiPS is hedging its bets here. Even with significant regression, Smith projects as a significant plus for the team.

I am mildly amused that David Freese got his best projection in the years after retiring.

Pitchers

This is where the team has shed depth in the last few years, and they’ve needed that depth given how populated their injured list has been. Rich Hill and Hyun-Jin Ryu are unsigned, which leaves Los Angeles thinner than when you could literally fill a second rotation of major-league quality starters after their first one.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

ZiPS gives Clayton Kershaw the slight edge in the projections, though this will be the last year for that unless their trajectories change. Rumors of Kershaw’s demise are premature — ZiPS still projects him with 26 WAR remaining in his left arm — but it’s undeniable at this point that he’s off his peak. You can see that in the comps, too, as his near-age comps have declined from the usual mix of pitchers like Sandy Koufax, Carl Hubbell, and Lefty Grove. Now, Koufax’s abrupt end to his career caused him to fall off the list, but the top end of Kershaw’s comp list has a lot more Hall of Very Good types, like John Tudor, Jerry Reuss, and David Wells. But hey, Walker Buehler landed the Tom Seaver comp, thus keeping the team in-line with the Hall of Fame comps in classic Mechanics.

The bullpen projects as solid, but unspectacular. ZiPS sees the team as having a very deep assortment of relief pitching, it’s just not in head-over-heels in love with many of them. Kenley Jansen’s struggles have pulled him out of the elite tier and Blake Treinen’s bounce back season is still in the To Be Determined category.

Prospects

The Dodgers always seem to have a ready stash of prospects who just happen to fit the team’s needs at the right time. Yasmani Grandal leaving and Russell Martin showing aging? Well, here’s Will Smith and Keibert Ruiz. Corey Seager only a couple years from free agency? Okay, let’s have Gavin Lux engage full beast mode in 2019. Pitching defections? Let’s just have Dustin May emerge as a top 10 prospect, and just three years from being signed from out in Fraggle Rock.

ZiPS thinks May could fit in the rotation right now, but the Dodgers will likely be conservative and continue to stretch out Julio Urías and take more looks at Ross Stripling. I’m still cautiously optimistic — from the POV of the Dodgers, of course — that Ryu ends up back with the team.

I thought ZiPS would ding Keibert Ruiz for a season of mixed results that ended early due to a broken finger. Ruiz’s .254/.329/.330 line at Double-A Tulsa as a repeater was unimpressive, but the fact remains he was still a catcher who couldn’t even legally drink until midseason. Just as ZiPS knows that young catchers develop and progress oddly, which has resulted in it knocking Will Smith down a peg, it also gives a lot of leeway to Ruiz. The day will come when the Dodgers have to choose between Ruiz and Smith, but it’s hard to have sympathy for a team struggling with having to figure out what to do with too many good young catchers.

If you’re looking for a few of those veteran minor league relievers who comes up to the majors and are perfectly average pitchers for a few years before being overpaid by the Rockies, Shea Spitzbarth is ZiPS’s favorite in the Dodgers’ system. With only average velocity to go with a loopy curve and a fosh-like changeup, Spitzbarth’s painful 25 innings in Triple-A probably kept him from getting serious Rule 5 consideration, but ZiPS sees something there and Steamer’s not all that far away from ZiPS. ZiPS isn’t buying Spitzbarth, but it is intrigued by another interesting minor league fringe player in Zach McKinstry, who hit .279/.352/.455 for Tulsa before a .382/.421/.753 Triple-A debut in 23 games. Couple that with the fact that McKinstry has played second, third, and shortstop extensively to go along with a few outfield appearances, and you have an interesting role player to watch.

One pedantic note for 2020: for the WAR graphic, I’m using FanGraphs’ depth charts playing time, not the playing time ZiPS spits out, so there will be occasional differences in WAR totals.

Ballpark graphic courtesy Eephus League. Depth charts constructed by way of those listed here.

Batters – Standard
Player B Age PO PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS
Cody Bellinger L 24 1B 641 547 108 160 32 4 40 120 88 126 16 4
Max Muncy L 29 2B 523 437 81 112 20 1 29 92 77 131 4 1
Corey Seager L 26 SS 561 506 78 141 36 2 19 87 47 108 2 1
Justin Turner R 35 3B 490 428 64 122 25 1 19 66 44 74 3 1
Gavin Lux L 22 SS 605 550 80 147 25 8 21 79 52 136 10 7
Joc Pederson L 28 LF 468 409 70 102 23 2 27 75 49 104 2 3
Will D. Smith R 25 C 445 389 60 91 18 1 24 77 45 121 3 0
Chris Taylor R 29 SS 514 460 67 119 29 5 15 63 45 135 12 3
Alex Verdugo L 24 RF 476 432 55 123 25 2 13 54 37 63 7 2
Jedd Gyorko R 31 3B 350 314 39 78 13 1 15 52 32 78 3 0
A.J. Pollock R 32 CF 403 368 55 94 20 3 16 55 26 84 10 2
Austin Barnes R 30 C 319 278 40 64 14 1 7 35 34 70 5 2
Kiké Hernandez R 28 2B 440 390 57 92 20 2 17 61 42 94 4 0
Keibert Ruiz B 21 C 396 365 43 93 13 0 10 38 24 37 0 0
Jon Kemmer L 29 RF 411 368 51 87 18 2 19 57 32 126 3 3
David Freese R 37 3B 210 187 29 51 9 1 7 35 20 50 0 0
Tyler White R 29 1B 436 386 48 95 21 1 15 60 42 95 1 1
Matt Beaty L 27 1B 434 402 50 106 26 1 10 58 25 61 4 1
Russell Martin R 37 C 257 215 27 44 5 0 6 22 34 63 1 1
Jeter Downs R 21 SS 549 496 64 109 25 3 19 67 42 141 19 10
Edwin Rios L 26 3B 488 448 59 103 22 2 22 74 30 175 1 2
Kris Negron R 34 1B 409 373 47 86 12 3 11 44 26 118 9 3
Jacob Amaya R 21 SS 528 469 56 102 21 4 8 47 52 122 5 8
Andrew Toles R 28 LF 248 234 29 59 14 1 6 30 11 54 5 3
DJ Peters R 24 CF 550 487 63 95 18 3 22 67 46 223 2 2
Zach McKinstry L 25 2B 455 415 49 95 17 4 11 48 33 117 5 6
Connor Joe R 27 1B 434 378 50 85 19 2 11 47 47 104 1 3
Jose Lobaton B 35 C 292 267 27 57 12 1 8 31 21 80 1 0
Jake Peter L 27 2B 400 357 41 75 14 2 8 37 36 119 4 2
Kyle Garlick R 28 RF 385 358 46 81 20 2 18 57 21 132 1 0
Connor Wong R 24 C 446 413 48 87 17 3 17 57 25 170 7 4
Zach Reks L 26 LF 457 411 54 98 15 2 15 54 40 137 3 2
Rocky Gale R 32 C 289 270 25 59 9 1 3 23 12 59 1 1
Cameron Perkins R 29 RF 369 342 40 83 20 2 8 42 19 63 5 2
Sam McWilliams R 22 2B 304 273 34 54 12 1 9 33 25 106 8 1
Chris Parmelee L 32 1B 285 253 32 50 10 0 11 34 29 95 0 1
Ezequiel Carrera L 33 CF 234 210 26 47 7 1 4 16 18 57 8 1
Errol Robinson R 25 SS 419 385 41 84 14 2 6 32 30 110 11 6
Jared Walker L 24 1B 416 365 45 64 13 3 16 47 38 178 4 2
Shane Peterson L 32 RF 358 334 36 74 17 3 9 42 19 105 4 0
Drew Avans L 24 LF 414 379 43 83 12 4 10 39 28 123 18 9
Cristian Santana R 23 3B 512 494 50 114 20 1 16 61 11 138 0 1
Cody Thomas L 25 RF 524 482 55 95 18 5 17 62 33 196 4 4
Jeren Kendall L 24 CF 436 394 41 63 10 6 13 44 36 189 17 11
Carlos Rincon R 22 RF 462 421 50 83 19 1 18 53 35 160 3 2
Donovan Casey R 24 RF 485 452 53 93 15 4 15 54 28 179 11 3
Alex Avila L 33 C 243 199 22 40 7 0 9 27 42 90 1 0
Ryan Goins L 32 2B 421 381 36 86 19 2 6 37 33 108 2 3
Welington Castillo R 33 C 294 273 26 66 12 0 11 44 17 81 0 0

Batters – Advanced
Player BA OBP SLG OPS+ ISO BABIP RC/27 Def WAR No. 1 Comp
Cody Bellinger .293 .392 .585 157 .293 .315 8.9 6 6.2 Frank Robinson
Max Muncy .256 .373 .506 132 .249 .300 6.9 -4 3.8 Morgan Ensberg
Corey Seager .279 .342 .470 115 .192 .322 6.0 4 3.7 Davey Johnson
Justin Turner .285 .365 .481 124 .196 .307 6.7 1 3.3 Joe Torre
Gavin Lux .267 .331 .456 108 .189 .321 5.5 -2 2.9 Alan Trammell
Joc Pederson .249 .340 .513 124 .264 .270 6.2 2 2.6 Tom Brunansky
Will D. Smith .234 .319 .470 108 .237 .275 5.4 1 2.5 Darrell Porter
Chris Taylor .259 .329 .441 104 .183 .335 5.4 -5 2.1 Robby Thompson
Alex Verdugo .285 .341 .442 108 .157 .309 5.8 4 2.0 Curt Flood
Jedd Gyorko .248 .317 .439 100 .191 .285 5.1 2 1.6 Ed Spiezio
A.J. Pollock .255 .313 .457 102 .201 .291 5.4 -2 1.5 Mike Devereaux
Austin Barnes .230 .326 .363 85 .133 .284 4.2 2 1.1 Erik Pappas
Kiké Hernandez .236 .312 .428 96 .192 .269 4.8 -4 1.1 Steve Lombardozzi
Keibert Ruiz .255 .308 .373 81 .118 .261 4.2 1 1.1 Yadier Molina
Jon Kemmer .236 .311 .451 101 .215 .305 4.9 -1 0.9 Brian Lesher
David Freese .273 .348 .444 110 .171 .338 5.7 -2 0.9 Ken Caminiti
Tyler White .246 .323 .422 98 .176 .290 4.9 0 0.8 Larry Sutton
Matt Beaty .264 .313 .408 91 .144 .290 4.7 2 0.6 Dan Rohrmeier
Russell Martin .205 .331 .312 74 .107 .260 3.5 0 0.5 Chad Kreuter
Jeter Downs .220 .288 .397 81 .177 .268 3.9 -6 0.5 Dick Schofield
Edwin Rios .230 .285 .435 89 .205 .323 4.3 -5 0.5 Jim Presley
Kris Negron .231 .289 .367 74 .137 .307 3.8 8 0.4 Jalal Leach
Jacob Amaya .217 .298 .330 68 .113 .277 3.2 2 0.4 Ramon Vazquez
Andrew Toles .252 .290 .397 82 .145 .305 4.1 3 0.3 Rod Allen
DJ Peters .195 .282 .380 75 .185 .302 3.5 -3 0.2 Brent Clevlen
Zach McKinstry .229 .293 .369 76 .140 .293 3.6 -2 0.1 Travis Dawkins
Connor Joe .225 .316 .373 84 .148 .281 4.0 0 0.1 Ryan McGuire
Jose Lobaton .213 .274 .356 67 .142 .274 3.4 -1 0.1 George Mitterwald
Jake Peter .210 .288 .328 65 .118 .291 3.2 2 0.1 Adam Morrissey
Kyle Garlick .226 .275 .444 88 .218 .303 4.3 -3 0.0 Brian Brady
Connor Wong .211 .263 .390 72 .179 .310 3.5 -5 0.0 Troy Afenir
Zach Reks .238 .311 .394 87 .156 .320 4.3 -6 -0.1 Dale Holman
Rocky Gale .219 .254 .293 46 .074 .269 2.5 4 -0.2 Kirt Manwaring
Cameron Perkins .243 .291 .383 78 .140 .277 4.0 -1 -0.2 Virgil Chevalier
Sam McWilliams .198 .273 .348 65 .150 .285 3.4 -3 -0.3 Ryan Owens
Chris Parmelee .198 .281 .368 72 .170 .265 3.4 1 -0.3 Steve Yeager
Ezequiel Carrera .224 .290 .324 64 .100 .289 3.6 -4 -0.4 Greg Tubbs
Errol Robinson .218 .277 .312 58 .094 .290 3.0 -3 -0.6 Willie Lozado
Jared Walker .175 .272 .359 67 .184 .281 3.2 0 -0.7 Jim Orsag
Shane Peterson .222 .266 .371 68 .150 .295 3.6 -3 -0.8 Todd Dunwoody
Drew Avans .219 .274 .351 66 .132 .297 3.3 -1 -0.8 Gary Cathcart
Cristian Santana .231 .250 .372 64 .142 .288 3.2 -3 -0.8 Juan Salas
Cody Thomas .197 .256 .361 63 .164 .290 3.0 3 -0.9 Jamar Hill
Jeren Kendall .160 .232 .315 45 .155 .260 2.2 4 -1.1 Mike Rosamond
Carlos Rincon .197 .266 .375 69 .178 .267 3.3 -5 -1.1 Chad Roper
Donovan Casey .206 .254 .356 61 .150 .302 3.2 -1 -1.2 Wilkin Ramirez
Alex Avila .201 .342 .372 92 .171 .310 4.3 4 1.2 Wes Westrum
Ryan Goins .226 .287 .333 69 .108 .300 3.2 -1 -0.3 Rodney Nye
Welington Castillo .242 .289 .407 77 .165 .304 4.2 -3 0.1 Keith McDonald

Pitchers – Standard
Player T Age W L ERA G GS IP H ER HR BB SO
Clayton Kershaw L 32 12 7 3.24 27 27 166.7 142 60 24 31 176
Walker Buehler R 25 11 6 3.27 29 29 167.7 138 61 22 41 201
Hyun-Jin Ryu L 33 10 6 3.48 25 24 144.7 140 56 21 24 133
Kenta Maeda R 32 10 8 3.91 34 24 138.0 120 60 19 45 155
Dustin May R 22 9 7 4.08 33 25 141.3 139 64 20 36 129
Rich Hill L 40 7 4 3.59 18 18 87.7 73 35 13 28 103
Ross Stripling R 30 6 4 3.87 32 15 93.0 90 40 14 22 93
Kenley Jansen R 32 4 2 3.15 60 0 60.0 47 21 9 15 78
Julio Urias L 23 4 3 3.92 39 10 80.3 71 35 12 31 91
Blake Treinen R 32 6 4 3.41 59 0 63.3 55 24 5 26 65
Caleb Ferguson L 23 4 2 3.64 54 5 71.7 59 29 9 33 91
Mitchell White R 25 6 5 4.53 23 21 95.3 94 48 14 36 92
Victor Gonzalez L 24 4 4 4.33 39 14 89.3 89 43 11 37 77
Adam Kolarek L 31 5 3 3.34 67 0 56.7 54 21 3 18 42
Joe Kelly R 32 4 3 3.44 56 0 52.3 44 20 4 25 58
JT Chargois R 29 3 2 3.55 49 0 50.7 44 20 5 22 56
Josiah Gray R 22 6 7 4.94 27 26 122.0 123 67 22 35 101
Dennis Santana R 24 6 7 4.86 28 17 100.0 96 54 17 49 106
Pedro Baez R 32 5 3 3.88 65 0 60.3 51 26 9 23 66
Tony Gonsolin R 26 6 6 4.91 25 22 95.3 94 52 18 42 92
Shea Spitzbarth R 25 4 3 3.93 51 0 68.7 60 30 10 29 80
Scott Alexander L 30 3 2 3.83 54 0 51.7 50 22 4 21 40
Leo Crawford L 23 5 6 5.05 25 25 123.0 125 69 23 43 102
Josh Sborz R 26 4 3 3.96 56 0 61.3 55 27 9 23 68
Joe Broussard R 29 3 2 4.18 41 2 51.7 50 24 7 19 49
Kevin Quackenbush R 31 4 3 4.08 52 0 57.3 52 26 9 17 67
Rob Zastryzny L 28 5 6 5.06 24 16 99.7 106 56 18 39 84
Marshall Kasowski R 25 3 3 4.23 35 1 38.3 28 18 4 31 57
Dylan Floro R 29 4 4 4.21 53 0 57.7 59 27 7 18 46
Logan Bawcom R 31 4 5 5.10 20 12 72.3 77 41 14 27 58
Yimi Garcia R 29 2 2 4.24 56 0 51.0 49 24 10 10 53
Casey Sadler R 29 2 2 4.24 34 0 40.3 41 19 7 12 29
Edward Paredes L 33 3 2 4.32 34 0 33.3 31 16 4 16 35
Edwin Uceta R 22 6 7 5.29 26 25 115.7 120 68 23 54 111
Parker Curry R 26 5 5 5.16 28 12 89.0 96 51 18 30 76
Austin Hamilton L 26 5 6 5.14 22 8 68.3 75 39 11 28 49
Russell Martin R 37 0 0 6.00 4 0 3.0 4 2 1 0 2
Ryan Moseley R 25 4 4 4.66 47 2 73.3 71 38 5 53 60
Logan Salow L 25 3 3 4.76 43 2 56.7 49 30 7 43 66
Yadier Alvarez R 24 1 2 5.53 16 9 40.7 36 25 6 35 48
Nolan Long R 26 3 3 4.77 44 1 60.3 53 32 8 43 69
Jaime Schultz R 29 3 3 5.10 45 6 65.3 60 37 12 39 76
Layne Somsen R 31 2 2 4.99 23 0 30.7 30 17 4 20 29
Daniel Corcino R 29 6 7 5.49 24 18 100.0 104 61 20 50 89
Tyler Thornburg R 31 1 2 5.70 41 1 42.7 42 27 10 23 45
Michael Boyle L 26 3 4 5.83 35 6 63.3 69 41 13 35 54
Chris Nunn L 29 2 2 5.98 35 0 46.7 47 31 10 31 50
Jordan Sheffield R 25 3 6 6.44 40 8 58.7 59 42 13 53 64
Justin De Fratus R 32 7 11 6.09 22 19 115.3 140 78 28 32 70
Yordy Cabrera R 29 2 3 6.48 34 4 58.3 66 42 12 36 43
Stetson Allie R 29 1 2 7.28 41 0 38.3 39 31 10 38 44
J.D. Martin R 37 6 9 6.47 21 21 112.7 132 81 23 69 70

Pitchers – Advanced
Player K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BB% K% BABIP ERA+ ERA- FIP WAR No. 1 Comp
Clayton Kershaw 9.5 1.7 1.3 4.7% 26.5% .274 128 78 3.50 3.7 John Tudor
Walker Buehler 10.8 2.2 1.2 6.0% 29.6% .284 127 79 3.22 3.7 Tom Seaver
Hyun-Jin Ryu 8.3 1.5 1.3 4.1% 22.5% .290 119 84 3.73 2.9 Tommy John
Kenta Maeda 10.1 2.9 1.2 7.8% 27.0% .288 106 94 3.70 2.1 Mike Bielecki
Dustin May 8.2 2.3 1.3 6.0% 21.6% .295 102 98 3.96 1.8 Milt Pappas
Rich Hill 10.6 2.9 1.3 7.7% 28.2% .279 116 87 3.72 1.6 Al Leiter
Ross Stripling 9.0 2.1 1.4 5.7% 24.1% .297 107 93 3.85 1.3 Elmer Dessens
Kenley Jansen 11.7 2.3 1.4 6.2% 32.4% .277 132 76 3.28 1.0 Trevor Hoffman
Julio Urias 10.2 3.5 1.3 9.1% 26.6% .289 106 94 4.01 1.0 Tug McGraw
Blake Treinen 9.2 3.7 0.7 9.7% 24.2% .292 122 82 3.39 0.9 Roger McDowell
Caleb Ferguson 11.4 4.1 1.1 10.7% 29.4% .294 114 88 3.65 0.8 Billy McCool
Mitchell White 8.7 3.4 1.3 8.7% 22.2% .300 92 109 4.29 0.8 Tim Leary
Victor Gonzalez 7.8 3.7 1.1 9.4% 19.6% .297 96 104 4.30 0.8 Ken Heintzelman
Adam Kolarek 6.7 2.9 0.5 7.4% 17.4% .291 125 80 3.34 0.7 Pablo Torrealba
Joe Kelly 10.0 4.3 0.7 11.1% 25.7% .294 121 83 3.39 0.6 Dennis Higgins
JT Chargois 9.9 3.9 0.9 10.1% 25.7% .295 117 86 3.56 0.5 Tippy Martinez
Josiah Gray 7.5 2.6 1.6 6.7% 19.4% .283 84 119 4.73 0.5 Brad Radke
Dennis Santana 9.5 4.4 1.5 11.0% 23.9% .297 85 117 4.74 0.4 Mike Lumley
Pedro Baez 9.8 3.4 1.3 9.1% 26.1% .275 107 93 4.08 0.4 Donne Wall
Tony Gonsolin 8.7 4.0 1.7 10.0% 21.9% .289 85 118 5.03 0.4 Earl Wilson
Shea Spitzbarth 10.5 3.8 1.3 9.9% 27.2% .291 106 95 4.01 0.4 Blaine Neal
Scott Alexander 7.0 3.7 0.7 9.4% 17.9% .293 108 92 3.86 0.4 Harry Perkowski
Leo Crawford 7.5 3.1 1.7 8.1% 19.1% .283 82 122 5.00 0.4 Aaron Laffey
Josh Sborz 10.0 3.4 1.3 8.8% 26.1% .291 105 95 4.00 0.3 Steve Hoeme
Joe Broussard 8.5 3.3 1.2 8.6% 22.1% .297 99 101 4.15 0.3 Mark Lee
Kevin Quackenbush 10.5 2.7 1.4 7.1% 28.0% .299 102 98 3.77 0.2 Matt Whiteside
Rob Zastryzny 7.6 3.5 1.6 8.8% 19.0% .297 82 122 5.02 0.2 Jeff Musselman
Marshall Kasowski 13.4 7.3 0.9 17.8% 32.8% .300 98 102 3.99 0.1 Charlie Hough
Dylan Floro 7.2 2.8 1.1 7.3% 18.5% .297 99 101 4.10 0.1 John Boozer
Logan Bawcom 7.2 3.4 1.7 8.4% 18.1% .290 81 123 5.21 0.1 Howie Reed
Yimi Garcia 9.4 1.8 1.8 4.7% 24.9% .287 98 102 4.24 0.1 Lance Carter
Casey Sadler 6.5 2.7 1.6 6.9% 16.6% .276 98 102 4.89 0.1 Dan Quisenberry
Edward Paredes 9.5 4.3 1.1 10.9% 23.8% .300 96 104 4.08 0.0 Marshall Bridges
Edwin Uceta 8.6 4.2 1.8 10.4% 21.3% .298 78 127 5.25 0.0 Jeff Fulchino
Parker Curry 7.7 3.0 1.8 7.7% 19.4% .297 81 124 5.11 0.0 Darrell Coulter
Austin Hamilton 6.5 3.7 1.4 9.1% 16.0% .298 81 124 5.07 0.0 Wade Blasingame
Russell Martin 6.0 0.0 3.0 0.0% 15.4% .300 69 144 6.18 0.0 Tiny Bonham
Ryan Moseley 7.4 6.5 0.6 15.4% 17.4% .299 89 112 4.60 -0.1 Rich Gossage
Logan Salow 10.5 6.8 1.1 16.5% 25.3% .296 87 115 4.73 -0.1 Scott Wiggins
Yadier Alvarez 10.6 7.7 1.3 18.2% 25.0% .297 75 133 5.32 -0.2 Mike Thompson
Nolan Long 10.3 6.4 1.2 15.5% 24.9% .294 87 115 4.75 -0.2 Clay Bryant
Jaime Schultz 10.5 5.4 1.7 13.2% 25.8% .293 81 123 5.03 -0.2 Jake Robbins
Layne Somsen 8.5 5.9 1.2 14.1% 20.4% .299 83 120 4.94 -0.2 Ted Abernathy
Daniel Corcino 8.0 4.5 1.8 11.1% 19.7% .292 76 132 5.50 -0.3 Landon Jacobsen
Tyler Thornburg 9.5 4.9 2.1 12.0% 23.4% .286 73 137 5.73 -0.5 Dick Selma
Michael Boyle 7.7 5.0 1.8 11.9% 18.4% .299 71 140 5.80 -0.7 Doug Slaten
Chris Nunn 9.6 6.0 1.9 14.2% 22.9% .298 69 144 5.82 -0.8 Scott Forster
Jordan Sheffield 9.8 8.1 2.0 18.4% 22.2% .299 64 155 6.59 -1.0 Darin Moore
Justin De Fratus 5.5 2.5 2.2 6.2% 13.6% .296 68 147 5.95 -1.0 Allen Davis
Yordy Cabrera 6.6 5.6 1.9 13.0% 15.5% .297 64 156 6.23 -1.1 Marty McLeary
Stetson Allie 10.3 8.9 2.3 19.7% 22.8% .296 57 175 7.25 -1.3 James Warden
J.D. Martin 5.6 5.5 1.8 12.9% 13.1% .296 64 156 6.43 -1.4 Ed Riley

Players are listed with their most recent teams wherever possible. This includes players that are unsigned, players who will miss 2020 due to injury, and players who were released in 2019. So yes, if you see Joe Schmoe, who quit baseball back in June to form a ska-cowpunk Luxembourgian bubblegum pop-death metal band, he’s still listed here intentionally.

Both hitters and pitchers are ranked by projected zWAR — which is to say, WAR values as calculated by me, Dan Szymborski, whose surname is spelled with a z. WAR values might differ slightly from those which appear in the full release of ZiPS. Finally, I will advise anyone against — and might karate chop anyone guilty of — merely adding up WAR totals on a depth chart to produce projected team WAR.

ZiPS is agnostic about future playing time by design. For more information about ZiPS, please refer to this article.





Dan Szymborski is a senior writer for FanGraphs and the developer of the ZiPS projection system. He was a writer for ESPN.com from 2010-2018, a regular guest on a number of radio shows and podcasts, and a voting BBWAA member. He also maintains a terrible Twitter account at @DSzymborski.

52 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Cave Dameron
6 years ago

Thank you Dan, very cool!

Sammy Sooser
6 years ago

17.5% of Bellinger’s innings on the field came as a 1B last season. Shouldn’t he be projected where he played the most, as an RF? 69.5% of his time was spent there in ’19 (the rest was in CF), and he has more innings as an outfielder (1955.2) than a 1B (1764) for his career.

Sammy Sooser
6 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

I’m probably taking this too literally, I know you’re trying to make all of the puzzle pieces fit.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
6 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

Well the Frank Robinson comp would make more sense in RF

larry
6 years ago

Any chance of seeing what Cody Bellingers D would be in the OF? Is it + or -? I would guess a +2

OTMHeartBBCMember since 2019
6 years ago

only 80 innings for Urias who is slated to be in the rotation? even with the Dodgers typical gaming of the DL system, he should be 120-150 innings

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  OTMHeartBBC

Depth charts doesn’t currently expect Urias to start that much, but I agree that’s the team’s plan for him.

OTMHeartBBCMember since 2019
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

and May is not going to pitch that much, they should have their innings swapped

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  OTMHeartBBC

May isnt returning from injury and has pitched full seasons the last couple years, I dont think he’s going to be super innings coddled.

May has reached 130 innings pitched each of his 3 full minor league seasons.

There’s no reason he won’t reach the 150-160 innings that are the max the Dodgers let a starter throw in a regular season if he is effective. There will be no meaningful innings management for him.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

You wonder with the new IL rules to stop the games the Dodgers were playing if that 150-160 innings limit will be much higher. Everyone focuses on the 3 man limit, but the IL rules going back to 15 days(along with options going back to 15 days) are going to have a far greater impact IMO.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

It won’t. They played them before those rules, too, and they have enough guys to play them even with longer durations.

It might make it harder if REAL injuries pop up, the way it did in 2016. But they have the resources to make do (like they did in 2016).

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

I think those will for the Dodgers have a far greater impact with the bullpen btw….

D-WizMember since 2019
6 years ago
Reply to  OTMHeartBBC

Urias is only projected for 10 starts, which explains the low innings total. I think his role along with Dustin May’s and Kenta Maeda’s will be very fluid this year once again (and likely impossible to predict with any degree of certainty).

mikejuntMember
6 years ago

People keep talking about how the Dodgers need to choose between Ruiz and Smith and I think it’s wrong. The 2017/2018 Dodgers were intentionally built around two catchers who had the potential to be very good. In 2017, Yasmani Grandal was not his usual self in the 2nd half due to some injuries and major family concerns (his wife had a very high-risk pregnancy and he was flying back to LA to see her between cities on road trips and not sleeping). Austin Barnes stepped up. In 2018, it was the opposite: Barnes didn’t step up, but Grandal did. In both of those seasons, Dodgers Catcher wasn’t just one of the best positions on the team, it was one of the most valuable positions on any team in baseball (especially 2017, where Dodgers C had more total WAR than Angels CF in some systems).

Catchers already get the least PAs of any position due to off-days and are the most likely position on the diamond to be ‘playing through’ injury. I can’t imagine a better scenario for a baseball team than to have two above-average catchers and split the 700-750 PAs between them however their health and performance dictates. Even if both succeed as prospects, a team with this few needs probably gains more wins and more protection against setbacks by simply keeping both players and not giving them ‘enough’ PAs. There is no way to replace adequate catcher offense after an in-season injury: there aren’t even 15 catchers in MLB who can perform at a league-average level, much less 30. Having 2 of them on your roster is incredibly valuable protection against disasters.

Especially when both are also highly regarded framers. The team is so deep and the roster so stacked that even adding a player like Lindor or Rendon barely moves the needle; you have redundancy all over the infield. Keeping both catchers is the only way to have redundancy at the most injured position in baseball. There are probably not that many teams where this fact is true: most of them would get more benefit from trading the 2nd potential 4 win catcher for an equivalent position player at a position of need, but the Dodgers don’t have those. They have redundancy after redundancy at every position except catcher. They should just trot them both out there and be happy if they get 8 war from the position because both are healthy and good.

Cody Bellinger isn’t a first baseman anymore and he should be projected as an outfielder; it’ll change his WAR projections due to positional adjustments and potentially change his comps, as well. He won a gold glove in RF and played above-average defense in CF 2 seasons in a row: he’s never going to be more than a part-time 1st baseman when Max Muncy is also on the roster.

I would be interested if his comps changed if he was simmed at a different position.

Sammy Sooser
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Agreed, there’s no need to choose between Ruiz and Smith, a lot can change over a few seasons, and Smith can play on the dirt. Folks were disappointed by Keibert’s season, posting a .679 OPS at AA and AAA. At the same age, Smith posted a .664 OPS in the ACC.

We’ve been spoiled by Trout, Harper, Machado, Soto, Acuna, Tatis, etc. Those are rare situations, it’ll typically take longer for a dude to develop.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  Sammy Sooser

Repeating a level and being worse is never great, but he still did what he did at AA the season before, and was playing through injury.

Ruiz is special: a switch-hitting Willians Astudillo that doesn’t suck ass. Check out his career K rates.

Ruiz is what all the Astudillo-stans wanted Willians to be when he grew up.

Shalesh
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

And mostly all home-grown. Pollock/Hill/Kelly the only FA’s, Maeda and Ryu the foreign imports, and Taylor/Muncy/Turner/Gyorko — the cheap and rehabilitated castoffs. Now, they are running a $200M payroll, so they’ve been able to extend Kershaw, Jansen, and Turner. But this team wasn’t built on a wild FA spending spree in which all the FA’s just happened to work out great.

As a fan of another team, I’m just glad that with the graduation of Lux, May, Smith, and Ruiz, their amazing talent pipeline is going to take a break for a year or two.

phpope
6 years ago
Reply to  Shalesh

I’ll always find it amusing that teams succeeding in developing prospects and graduating them to the big league club drops them in all the prospect rankings.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  phpope

Prospect rankings are just that – PROSPECT rankings. They’re not rankings of -player development ability-. They’re there to tell you what is on the way that isn’t yet on the MLB roster: how much will this group get reinforced in the future?

No one attempts to rank teams by how good they are at developing talent, but it seems clear that certain teams are much better than others at certain things (Yankees pitching and Dodgers’ power hitting are particularly notable, you see Eric talk about how the Dodgers appear to be able to teach almost anyone to hit 20 HR, and very specific elements of swings that they appear to teach systemically. He’s made posts about it in the past).

phpope
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Yeah, I get all of that. Sometimes this site it so weird in how seriously people take things, especially throw-away comments. It was just an observation about the ranking systems and the binary distinctions made in them. And maybe to some degree, the nature of hope and the unknown.

hombremomento
6 years ago

And to think they almost traded Lux for Felipe Vazquez… Lucky them.

LakeShow
6 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

They never almost did that.

LakeShow
6 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

From the article: “The Dodgers refused to include middle infielder Gavin Lux, their top-ranked prospect, in a deal for Vazquez.”

hombremomento
6 years ago
Reply to  LakeShow

I wasn’t saying they planned on it, I was pointing out it could’ve possibly happened

wily moMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  hombremomento

{billy beane calls up the rays, asks them to give him wander franco for chad pinder. the rays hang up without even saying anything}

this guy: “and to think the rays almost traded wander franco for chad pinder”

Tristan
6 years ago

Lux as Alan Trammell in Year One? Yeah, that’ll play.

wily moMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Tristan

i like how their top hitters comp to a lot of pretty good managers, too

mattMember since 2023
6 years ago

As a Padres fan this post does not give me great joy

wily moMember since 2020
6 years ago

oh no ryu with the dreaded tommy john comp

these millennials probably see a tommy john baseball card and are like “lol why is this guy named after a surgery wtf”

fredsbankMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  wily mo

Was this funny in your head? Because it’s not funny here.

wily moMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  fredsbank

hey, at least i’m not the wander javier guy

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

how in the hell does ZIPS project 26 more war for Kershaw, yet only 3.7 this year? 26/3.7= 7 more years. Does ANYONE really think he pitches 7 more years? With all 7 at 3.7 level?

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan Szymborski

But even with 23 it’s 6.22 seasons at 3.7 level. Between regression and even lower durability than we’ve seen already, doesn’t exactly seem realistic in the least. Considering his WAR last year was 3.4 especially.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Kershaw would still be retiring before 40 in 7 more years; pitchers of his echelon often pitch into their 40s in some capacity

Maybe he won’t want to, but zips doesn’t care.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

do you really think he’s going to be one of those hanger on ers? seriously… To get 23 WAR at the 3.7 pace- he’d have to throw for over 1000 more innings.

and the 3.7 pace would be an uptick over last 2 seasons where he’s had a 3.3 and 3.4 WAR….. he might get 7 more seasons- maybe- but with 23 WAR?

Both seem rather ambitious.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Most guys as good as Kershaw do because they either love baseball or are milestone chasing.

So yeah, its possible. I don’t know if its LIKELY, but its possible. Kershaw turns 32 next season and has 169 career wins. If the Dodgers continue to be as good as it seems like they will in perpetuity, Kershaw still has the potential to be the last 300 game winner ever if he pitches into his 40s at a reasonable level.

I dont know if the odds favor that proposition anymore, but it’s definitely possible: 13 wins a season on average until he’s 41 would get him there, and winning more than 13 in the near future is reasonably possible given how good the Dodgers will be over the next few years, at least.

Do you think Clayton Kershaw would just retire at 39 with 275 career wins? He’s gonna at least think about it.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

I think odds are better that he retires at the end of this current deal than it is he pitches into his 40’s.

The bigger problem is physical. Do you think he’s going to be able to continue to even make 25-28 starts every year here? I don’t think that’s remotely close to a guarantee. He’s not made more than 28 starts in 4 years.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

I don’t think the healthiest pitcher in the world would make more than 28 starts for the Los Angeles Dodgers, my friend. They build pitcher’s seasons around the expectation of playing all the way to the world series. Guys get skipped or held back a day or whatnot all the time with the intention of preserving them through the end of November.

Peak Clayton Kershaw wouldn’t make 35 starts for this team anymore; they specifically blame letting him throw 210+ innings in those seasons for his reduced effectiveness in the playoffs afterwards. They view it as a mistake that brought his decline phase on sooner than it otherwise could have.

It will be rare that any Dodgers starter does more than qualify for the ERA title, no matter how good he is.

It is not their way.

Walker Buehler’s 30 starts/182 innings last year is likely pretty close to the upper bound of what they will ever permit for any pitcher going forward. He was intentionally skipped despite being healthy several times.

I believe they view 200-210 innings as the maximum total a modern pitcher can throw in an effective season, and that a postseason demands 20 or 30 of them.

I think it would take a combination of major injury problems and a tight divisional race to cause them to deviate, as even half of that scenario (2017) was not enough to get them to do so.

Rules changes might be problematic for other teams, but the Dodgers running around with so much viable talent are unlikely to be dissuaded.

It may actaully emphasize their pitching depth advantage MORE than it used to, because it will prevent teams from playing the DL games with 6 or 7 starters, but the Dodgers can still find ways to play them with 9 or 10.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

I dunno- the Dodgers took it to another level come 2017 when the 10 day rule took effect….

And with Kershaw- the only reason he’s not made more than 28 starts last 4 years were all of his various trips to the IL(none gimmicky).

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

None gimmicky, and none major (or at least not since 2016). Buehler had zero injuries last year and only made 30 starts. There’s an upward bound on what they will permit. For that matter, if Buehler gets better and starts to pitch deeper into games like Kershaw does, he’ll probably have starts shaved off.

If you follow the team and read the kinds of things they talk about it’s quite clear that innings management is a goal. They talked about it A LOT after 2016.

And they’ll keep doing it as long as they have depth. Remember, they’re adding a roster spot next year. That will help make it easier to do this. This is a team with extremely flexible position players. They’ll put one of those guys in the 26th slot in order to use the roster spot for pitching.

I imagine we’ll see them do more of what they did a few times this year already and carry a starter who they don’t have a spot for and instead have them throw from the bullpen once or twice on what would be throw days to make up for their using up the roster spot active.

If you are a fan of the team, you don’t understand how they operate very well.

NATS FanMember since 2018
6 years ago

The team to beat in the NL, unfortunately for the rest of the league. So deep and talented!

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago

kind of curious for a guy like a Kolarek how is ZIPS handling the new 3 batter rule? 16 of his 26 Dodgers appearances were to 1 batter, and another 4 were to 2 batters.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
6 years ago

Frank Robinson and Tom Seaver!

Art Fay
6 years ago

I’m worried about the rotation this year. I feel like the dreams are built on sand if this all they roll with. Sure the offense can tip the scales in their favor, but come playoff time, it could all slip through their hands.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  Art Fay

I think it’s overblown. Ryu wasn’t expected to be as good as he was, and you never expected that many innings from Hill. May will contribute quite a bit, and Gonsolin has the potential to at least be another Stripling, and Mitch White is coming as well, plus Josiah Gray behind.

It isn’t really that different than what you expected last year.

stever20Member since 2017
6 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

The fact is though that Ryu did contribute 180 innings of 2.32 ERA ball. Him being gone and not replaced is going to leave a pretty big void. Add to that 60 innings from Rich Hill of 2.45 ERA ball- and that’s a lot of really good innings to be replaced. The only other regular starter who posted a sub 3 ERA was Gonsolin.

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  stever20

Yeah, but the benefit of having 10 guys is that it’s more opportunities for one of them to step up. Not every player is gonna have exactly the seasons listed above. Those are the medians. There will be 10th percentile outcomes and 90th percentile outcomes. Some will undershoot. Some will overshoot. The Dodgers don’t just build for depth to protect against injury, the build for depth to protect against 10th percentile outcomes and gain more opportunities to capitalize on 90ths.

Remember when Alex Wood was randomly a top 10 pitcher in baseball for most of a season in 2017? Remember when Ross Stripling turned into Justin Verlander for 3 months in 2018? The point of having so many faces is to increase the odds that one does so.

May’s better than Gonsolin; White’s not far away. Josiah Gray’s a bit further. There’s still Ferguson, Stripling, Dennis Santana, others ..

Would I bet you any one of those pitchers will be great next year? I would not.

Would I bet you one of them will significantly beat his projections? Yes.

In a group of 6, you expect a couple people to hit their 75th percentile outcomes. Those will be the ones who get the innings. The ones who hit their 10th will go back to the minors or the bullpen.

That’s why the Dodgers build this way. It’s the point. It’s why depth is good. It’s true with the hitters, too, but hitters are more stable than pitchers, so it both matters less and helps more: when a hitter breaks out, he usually stays broken. Cody Bellinger, Max Muncy and Gavin Lux don’t turn back into pumpkins. The pitchers might.

But the principle is the same.

DarthSader9Member since 2025
6 years ago

Just how bananas are we talking for these long term Lux projections?

mikejuntMember
6 years ago
Reply to  DarthSader9

His top comp is Alan Trammell, look at the career arc of Alan Trammell.

Also, keep in mind that Trammell debuted at 19 and Lux is 22, so he’s being compared to Trammell entering his 4th major league season, where he put up 4.3 war and started a string of 11 consecutive seasons of at least 3 WAR, spiking as high as 8.

That’s ‘decent odds at a HOF career’ career path (nothing’s ever favored, of course).