2021 Trade Value: #1 to #10

Design by Luke Hooper

As is the annual tradition at FanGraphs, we’re using the week after the All-Star Game to take stock of the top 50 players in baseball by trade value in anticipation of next week’s trade deadline. For a more detailed introduction to this year’s exercise, as well as a look at those players who fell just short of the top 50, be sure to read the Introduction and Honorable Mentions piece, which can be found in the widget above.

For those who have been reading the Trade Value Series the last few seasons, the format should look familiar. For every player, you’ll see a table with the player’s projected five-year WAR from 2022-2026, courtesy of Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS projections. The table will also include the player’s guaranteed money, if any, the year through which their team has contractual control of them, last year’s rank (if applicable), and then projections, contract status, and age for each individual season through 2026, if the player is under contract or team control for those seasons. Last year’s rank includes a link to the relevant 2020 post. One note on the rankings: particularly at the bottom of the list, there’s not a lot of room between players. The ordinal rankings clearly matter, and we put players where they are for a reason, but there’s not much room between, say, 35 and 60. The magnitude of the differences in this part of the list is quite small. Several talent evaluators we talked to might prefer a player in the Honorable Mentions section to one on the back end of the list, or vice versa. We think the broad strokes are correct — but with so many players carrying roughly equivalent value, disagreements abounded. Thanks are due to Sean Dolinar for his help in creating the tables in these posts. At the bottom of the page, there is a grid showing all the players who have been ranked up to this point.

Below you’ll see commentary from both of us for each player. And now, on to this year’s final group.

Five-Year WAR +21.3
Guaranteed Dollars $72.0 M
Team Control Through 2024*
Previous Rank #48
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 34 +5.1 $37.5 M
2023 35 +4.8 $34.5 M
2024 36 +4.4 $32.5 M
Team Option *deGrom can opt out after 2022

First things first: deGrom was eighth on these rankings before landing on the Injured List last week. I won’t claim we used some fancy algorithm to re-rank him, but this is a hedge. Why deGrom? Because no player carries more value for a team who wants to win playoff games now (assuming health, as I will for the rest of this blurb). The contract isn’t the cheapest, but if you trade for him now, you’re getting the best pitcher on the planet for up to four straight postseason runs. It’s “up to” because deGrom has an opt out after 2022 and there’s a team option for 2024 — but this seems like a case where it’s going to extend through 2024 unless he either goes full supernova upfront (fine for the acquiring team) or blows out his arm before the team option.

Obviously, deGrom isn’t getting traded. But we’re squarely in the realm of hypotheticals here, and playoff teams would jump at the opportunity to turn whatever rotation they have into probably the best in baseball by adding the best pitcher in the game. This is a place where WAR doesn’t really work; starters provide a disproportionate amount of value in October, when they pitch a higher percentage of games. Who better to have in that situation than deGrom? This contract is a rare and wondrous thing: the chance to get one of the best players in the game for as many as four straight years without then having them for seven years of decline down the road. – BC

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

In April of this year, deGrom was twice given an extra day of rest in what seemed like smart load management. In early May, he was scratched with side tightness, then left his next start early with more of the same, which led to a brief IL stint. Three starts later, he left a game after six innings due to flexor tendonitis; an MRI showed no structural damage. He left his next start after just three innings due to shoulder soreness. Another MRI showed no big issues. Last week, it was revealed that deGrom had more forearm tightness. Another MRI, and more insistence that nothing that bad is going on here. The ace threw off flat ground yesterday, per SNY.

So what does one do with Jacob deGrom? When he’s healthy, he’s the best pitcher in baseball, and there’s not much of an argument — prior to earning a membership with the MRI Club of America, he was on an historic single-season pace. He could make just over $100 million from 2022-24, but as Ben mentioned, he can also opt out after next season. He’d be tough to trade today, but if healthy, you’d be a fool not to want him. There’s really no one like deGrom, who averages (averages!) over 99 mph with his fastball and has a slider that, at 90-93 mph, matches the average fastball velocity from a decade ago. Again, he’s the best pitcher in baseball when healthy, and this 10th-place ranking is the midpoint of potential outcomes based on his recent injuries, despite the constant MRIs that seem to provide some sort of assurance that things might not be as bad as they sound. – KG

Five-Year WAR +22.9
Guaranteed Dollars $74.0 M
Team Control Through 2024
Previous Rank #5
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 28 +5.5 $13.0 M
2023 29 +5.3 $30.5 M
2024 30 +4.7 $30.5 M

Thanks to the structure of his deal, Bregman isn’t prohibitively expensive over the next three years. He’s set to make only $13 million next year, before tipping into the world of mega-deals in 2023. Three years is a sweet spot; you’re not trading for a rental, but you’re also not wearing the ugly decline phase five years out, though Bregman is only 27, so an extra year or two wouldn’t be a deal breaker. Team sources seemed to agree; we got plenty of pushback on Cole and Trout, but not much on Bregman’s inclusion, and indeed, if you do a pure surplus value accounting, he’d place highly on the list.

The real question, then, is whether he’s still the 2018-19 MVP candidate, or whether his last 350 plate appearances represent a new level. Projection systems, Kevin and I, and pretty much everyone we talked to agree: we’re willing to bet on a rebound. Bregman has never been a plus-power type, but he makes the most of his contact by pulling the ball in the air and hitting line drives. He combines patience with phenomenal bat control, and while I’ll take the under on him walking 17.2% of the time in a season again, he’s a perennial threat to walk more than he strikes out, and his air-happy approach will lead to torrid stretches. Am I worried about the changing baseball here? A little, but the ball has been de-juiced down to 2018-19 levels — when Bregman hit 72 bombs over two years — so I’m not that worried. – BC

In 2019, Bregman hit 41 home runs and nearly usurped Mike Trout in AL MVP voting. That suggests immense power, but in reality, Bregman’s pop is merely plus, as no player in baseball takes greater advantage of the Crawford Boxes than the 27-year-old third baseman, who will earn $74 million from 2022-24.

Slowed this year by a hamstring issue that delayed his spring training debut until late March, as well as a brief a stint on the COVID IL and his current quadriceps injury, Bregman has struggled to get locked in for any kind of extended stretch in 2021, but when that happens, he’s an on-base machine who makes as much hard contact as anyone in baseball. Scouts and stats differ greatly on the defense, as the eyeballs say he’s a good third baseman, while the numbers aren’t so glowing, but in terms of offense, expecting a .900-plus OPS through the remainder of his contract with 80 extra-base hits and nearly 100 walks a year feels like a safe expectation. – KG

Five-Year WAR +19.8
Guaranteed Dollars $5.25 M
Team Control Through 2024
Previous Rank #18
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 27 +4.6 $5.25 M**
2023 28 +4.3 Arb3
2024 29 +3.8 Arb4
Arb **Can increase based on GS/Cy Young finish in 2021

Personally, I’d take Corbin Burnes over Buehler. But cooler heads prevailed, and Buehler belongs in the top 10 anyway. He’s an absolute beast, to the point where writing about his skills is almost a waste of time. Do you like pitchers who strike out a ton of batters? Do you like it when they avoid walks, too? How about if they have four plus pitches? He’ll give you six or more innings of excellence every time out, and look the part while doing it.

We did get some feedback that the top 10 was high for anyone with only three years of team control remaining, but that was definitely the minority opinion. When you get to this level of player — a stud who scouts, data-driven types and the ever-increasing group that uses the best parts of both all agree is a top-flight pitcher — valuations are non-linear. Teams would pay more for 12.7 WAR (per ZiPS) over three years than they would over six, and it’s not particularly close. Teams also seem higher on Buehler than ZiPS, though by any accounting he’s an ace. Stars! They’re not just like the rest of us, particularly when it comes to the measurement of value. – BC

Buehler has become the poster boy for teams finding comfort when drafting a player who has recently had — or in Buehler’s case, required — Tommy John surgery. Buehler underwent the procedure shortly after signing as a first-round pick in 2015 and since then he’s been the picture of health while exceeding all of the projections for him when coming out of Vanderbilt. Even post foreign substance crackdown, few pitchers in baseball can spin it like Buehler. It’s a six-pitch mix where everything is hard, everything moves, and everything is bolstered by 70 command.

Buehler signed a unique extension prior to this spring training, one that will pay him $2.75 million in 2021, but defines his 2022 salary mostly by how many games he starts this year. By taking the bump every five days for the remainder of the season, he’ll earn $6.25 million next year (the number above reflects the guarantee he’s already earned with his current number of starts) and he has a chance to push that near $7 million should he finish the year among the top three in National League Cy Young voting. That’s unlikely but hardly out of the question. He’s on pace for a big pay day in 2023 in terms of the third year of the arbitration scale, but a starter of this quality, with an excellent track record of health since his surgery, is always a bargain pre-free agency. – KG

Five-Year WAR +27.1
Guaranteed Dollars $337.5 M
Team Control Through 2032
Previous Rank #47
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 29 +6.5 $22.9 M
2023 30 +6.1 $25.4 M
2024 31 +5.6 $30.4 M
2025 32 +4.9 $30.4 M
2026 33 +4.1 $30.4 M

This spot on the list is based on a close reading of Betts’ contract terms. As best as we (and a few people we consulted with, including Jason Martinez) can tell, the strange nature of his deal changes team obligations. The Dodgers gave him a record $65 million signing bonus, payable in 13 equal installments. We believe that lets a team that trades for him off the hook for the $55 million of it that is still payable, which is a big deal. Money would always get moved around to make both teams happy in any swap involving a contract this big, but that’s a meaningful difference and made us comfortable bumping him up the list some. In fact, when we did a ZiPS-based calculation of surplus value incorporating discounts and inflation (one of the many inputs we used), Betts finished 10th. The total outlay is $55 million lower than the table above shows — $5 million in each year.

There’s obviously tons of uncertainty in a projection that goes that long, but models absolutely love the shape of Betts’ production, and this year is a great example of why. Despite a rough season defensively (which we’re not too concerned about) and a much-hyped slump, he’s on pace for 5.3 WAR, and he’s been playing hurt while the Dodgers chase the stubborn Giants. And as an added note to the pedants in the group (you know we love you), we did take into account the fact that Betts has deferred payments that accelerate if traded. He’s obviously not going to be traded, but if he were, even with the acceleration, the pile of superstar-level production is simply too large to ignore. – BC

You know a player is great when his OPS is pushing .900 and everything you read or hear about him is focused on when he’s going to really get going. Hampered this year by a seemingly never-ending series of minor dings, Betts is still Betts when he’s available and healthy. He destroys fastballs and his already outstanding approach has actually improved in 2021, as he’s become more aggressive in the zone while chasing out of it less than he has in the last two seasons. Overall, the underlying metrics suggest he’s still largely the same player who notched top-10 MVP finishes in 2019 and ’20, and he might even be getting better in some ways. It’s just his health that is holding him back and none of this year’s myriad issues feel like long-term concerns.

Betts is signed for (gulp) 11 more years, during which he will be paid close to $340 million. Yes, it’s a ton of years, and yes, it’s a ton of money, but if he can maintain his five-to-eight win pace into his early 30s, which seems more probable than plausible, he’ll be more than worth it. – KG

Five-Year WAR +20.2
Guaranteed Dollars
Team Control Through 2027
Previous Rank #11
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 21 +3.0 Pre-Arb
2023 22 +3.7 Pre-Arb
2024 23 +4.3 Pre-Arb
2025 24 +4.5 Arb1
2026 25 +4.7 Arb2
Pre-Arb
Arb

On a relative basis, I was on the sideline for this one, as I don’t have the same expertise in prospects and early-majors players that Kevin and many of our contacts do. That said, what did you think we were going to do, not put Franco in the top 10? He’s had a shaky start to his major league career, but it’s been a while since we’ve seen such a clear star at such a young age, and the other players you might put in that category are ahead of him on this list. And by electing to not play Wander Franco, the Rays squeezed out an extra year of low salaries, as he’ll likely miss the Super 2 cutoff and so won’t be eligible for arbitration until 2025.

Money aside, there’s not much to knock about him. Shortstops with 80 hit tools don’t come along very often, and many of those who have are in the Hall of Fame. Switch hitters are supposed to take a long time to develop, and yet Franco has set fire to every minor league level he’s appeared in, no matter how preposterously young he is for the competition. Some teams might even have Franco first on their personal lists — if you truly have no money to spend, three years of excellent production at basically no cost (and then three more on the relative cheap) is enticing. But we ended up drawing the line here, and everyone ahead of him has no question marks around whether they can do it in the majors. – BC

For every elite prospect, you can find at least one detractor in the scouting world. There’s always that one person who for whatever reason just doesn’t see it, or expects future goodness as opposed to greatness. That’s just not the case with Franco, or at least not as far as I can see. If there is somebody in the evaluation community who thinks Franco is going to be anything less than an amazing big league player, I haven’t found them, and I’ve made a significant effort to do so.

At times, Franco feels almost too good to fail. He has a good approach at the plate, although it’s unlikely to ever result in high walk rates, as his incredible plate coverage means there are just too many pitches he can drive. And then there is the marriage of plus-plus bat speed, above-average power and a nearly staggering ability to make contact with that combination. He’s also a solid-average shortstop with a plus arm who runs well, too. Oh, and have I mentioned that he’s only 20? Franco is only 20 games into what has so far been a quite unlucky major league career, but some are already wondering if he’ll be the next free agent to break contract barriers when he hits the open market at an age that would suggest he’s just entering his prime. – KG

Five-Year WAR +35.4
Guaranteed Dollars
Team Control Through 2024
Previous Rank #3
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 23 +7.0 Arb2
2023 24 +7.1 Arb3
2024 25 +7.1 Arb4
Arb

My god, Soto can hit. Despite a delayed and slow start — he had only 60 PA in April and finished May with a 112 wRC+ — he’s back to his normal scorched-earth nonsense. He’s hitting a hilarious .302/.424/.498 in what people are calling a down season, and I kid you not, he’s at .390/.513/.780 for the month of July. Not that July statistics are meaningful or important to the exclusion of others, I just like writing down Soto’s statline and gawking at it. Soto is the best projected hitter in baseball, and he’s also been well above average in the outfield this year. It’s getting ridiculous.

He’s no longer just a plate discipline guy, though he’s probably the best in the league at knowing and exploiting the zone. But he’s also in the 95th percentile for maximum exit velocity and 97th for hard hit rate. He’ll make a bundle in arbitration and it really doesn’t matter, because he’ll be worth far more than that. Only the fact that he’ll be eligible for free agency in three years kept me from putting Soto first on the list — that and the fact that everyone in this rarefied air is incredible. For my money, though, Soto is the best position player in the game, right this minute — and he’s only 22. – BC

Soto isn’t having the same season he did in 2020, but that would be an almost impossible task after he lead the league in all three triple-slash stats. He’s still one of the top 10 offensive players in baseball, with only a May slump keeping him out of the conversation for the top spot. Soto’s game begins with some of the best strike zone awareness in the game, an astounding achievement for a 22-year-old, as no qualified hitter in the majors swings at fewer pitches out of the zone. He can be a bit passive in the zone at times, but limiting the mistakes he makes while waiting for something to drive mitigates the issue. Then there is the massive power. It all adds up to a perennial MVP candidate. Soto still has three arbitration years remaining and will be building from a platform of $8.5 million this year, meaning he’ll earn some big numbers for a guy who hasn’t reached free agency yet, while still being excessively underpaid based on the value he provides on the field.

The only aspect of Soto’s future that gives some industry people minor pause is his size. Four years ago, he was 185 pounds in the Sally League. He’s packed on 40 since and has gone from a plus runner to a fringy one in the process, and some worry that even more bulk will lead to him becoming a bat-only type. Still, even in that unlikely worst-case scenario, Soto is on pace for a record-breaking free agency heading into the 2025 season. – KG

Five-Year WAR +25.6
Guaranteed Dollars $26.0 M
Team Control Through 2028
Previous Rank #6
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 25 +5.3 $5.0 M
2023 26 +5.3 $7.0 M
2024 27 +5.2 $7.0 M
2025 28 +4.9 $7.0 M
2026 29 +4.9 $7.0 M
Team Option

Albies isn’t as good as Soto. He’s not as good as anyone in the top 10, if you ask me. But he’s also getting paid roughly nothing for approximately the next infinity years, and he’s an above average hitter playing a middle infield position. He’d be a bargain even if he declined to a 100 wRC+, and there’s not much indication that will happen. Teams value true superstars in excess of their pure surplus value — just look at our top 10 — but this is a two-by-four of surplus value smashed across your head. You simply can’t ignore it.

It sucks that we have to talk about Albies this way, though. The first word in every conversation about his value as a baseball player is almost always going to be the ludicrously team-friendly contract he signed before the 2019 season — seven years and $35 million, with two wait-what-why team options at $7 million tacked on to really make it feel silly. He’s an excellent player, undoubtedly one of the best 40 or 50 in baseball, and that should be enough. Are we part of the problem for putting him where he is on this list? Maybe. But I can simultaneously feel conflicted about the deal and recognize that any team would give up a bundle for his discounted services. – BC

The first time I travelled to the Dominican Republic was in January of 2013 for MLB’s annual international showcase, which gathers the best and the brightest from the upcoming class even though the overwhelming majority of the players in attendance have already agreed to verbal deals. It was a much-hyped event, and I was there to get my feet wet and calibrate my eye to that level of player. Power-hitting outfielder Eloy Jiménez and an impressive Venezuelan shortstop named Gleyber Torres were there, both headed to the Cubs. The second I walked into the stadium in San Cristobal, I was met by a friend with another club who welcomed me to the DR and told me, “Keep an eye on this big kid going to the Red Sox, he can absolutely rake.” That kid was Rafael Devers.

It’s still the most star-studded event I’ve ever attended in terms of future impact. I wrote up all of the players I saw, and while I didn’t put the biggest recommended signing bonus on him, I still distinctly remember how, among all the already famous names, all the seven-figure future bonuses, the best pure baseball player on the field was a tiny shortstop (he was somewhere in the neighborhood of 5-foot-6 and less than 150 pounds) from Curaçao, who at the time went by Ozhaino Albies. He had a remarkable two days. There was no power but he sprayed hard line drives to all fields in batting practice, made every play during fielding drills, and was even more impressive when games started, at one point laying down a bunt for a base hit (unheard of at such events) when he noticed the infield playing too far back. It was hard not to fall in love with him, and despite the tiny frame, he still earned a $350,000 bonus from Atlanta that summer.

As impressive as he was, nobody in 2013 foresaw the player Albies would become: an All-Star second baseman with power for his size who can be fairly described as remarkable. Albies isn’t the fourth best player in baseball, but he chose to take security over upside to an extreme degree when he signed his 2019 extension, and that deal plays a big role here. It’s hard to blame a player for taking $40-plus million when it’s put in front of him, but someone, somewhere should have better impressed upon Albies just how much he was leaving on the table. – KG

Five-Year WAR +27.8
Guaranteed Dollars $83.0 M
Team Control Through 2028
Previous Rank #1
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 24 +5.6 $15.0 M
2023 25 +5.7 $17.0 M
2024 26 +5.6 $17.0 M
2025 27 +5.5 $17.0 M
2026 28 +5.3 $17.0 M

Acuña was number one on our list before he tore his ACL and I wouldn’t fault you for keeping him atop your own personal ranking. He was in the midst of his best season yet before a fluke accident ended it, making a strong claim as the best player in baseball (I still had Soto atop my personal rankings, and had Acuña in a tie for second, but that’s splitting hairs). He’s on a Trout-ian trajectory, improving the areas that were initially seen as deficiencies to the point where he’s casually posting excellent chase rates while still being aggressive in the strike zone. His double-digit walk rates and average strikeout numbers look like the real deal, something few expected after his first few years in the majors.

The contract is absurd, obviously. It might not be Albies-level bad, but it’s simply too little money to pay such a bright star in the context of major league revenues, and it comes with two team options that are as close to automatic pickups as it gets. There’s really nothing to fault Acuña about, aside from the injury, and as Dan Szymborski pointed out in his look at Acuña’s projections following the tear, the prognosis is good for a mostly-complete return to form. But there’s clearly some risk here, and some lost playing time even in the best case scenario. It’s not a big risk — which is why he’s number three on this list — but it’s scary enough to bump him down ever so slightly. – BC

Acuña’s gruesome July 10 injury was heartbreaking, both for Braves fans and for people who simply love watching great players. Still, while it greatly hampers the chances of the Braves turning things around in 2021, it doesn’t significantly impact Acuña’s long-term value, as after this season, the seven years and $117 million left on his extension is one of the most team-friendly deals in the game.

Prior to the injury, Acuña was in the midst of a career-year, which is really saying something for a player who has already done so much in his early 20s. By cutting down on his strikeouts, hitting more balls in the air, and having his power numbers go from plus-plus to among the best in the game, Acuña is one of the most dangerous hitters in baseball, and even if his plus-plus wheels dissipate following his recovery from knee surgery, it shouldn’t have a much of, if any effect on his overall contributions. – KG

Five-Year WAR +33.9
Guaranteed Dollars
Team Control Through 2025
Previous Rank #24
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 23 +7.1 Arb1
2023 24 +6.9 Arb2
2024 25 +6.9 Arb3
2025 26 +6.7 Arb4
Arb

After two seasons of solid offensive production but too many grounders, Guerrero converted his prodigious raw power and plus hit tool into what observers have been calling for since his days as the top prospect in baseball. He’s a spray hitter, only instead of peppering line drives into the gaps, he sends them over the outfield wall. He’s aggressive in the strike zone, and swings violently enough that he runs a high whiff rate, but he makes up for it by hunting pitches he can drive and spitting on balls outside of the strike zone; add plus pitch recognition to his list of tricks. Several team contacts we spoke to thought he deserved the top spot on the list, even before Acuña’s injury; he’ll hit Super 2 status this year, which means four years of arbitration-salary control for one of the best hitters in the game, a young superstar coming into his own.

If I wanted to throw cold water on the Guerrero hype, I could point out that he has a worse wRC+ than Yordan Alvarez since they debuted in 2019, or that he’s first base-only, unlike the rest of the position players in this rarefied air. But that’s silly, and I don’t actually think those things matter. Vlad might not be a true-talent 190 wRC+ hitter, but pretty much no one is, and he’s going to be an absurd bargain for years (even with healthy arbitration figures) while perennially competing for MVP awards. He’s forced himself into the discussion for best player in baseball, and no one we talked to cared too much about the defensive limitations; when you hit that well, you could be DH-only and teams would hardly care. – BC

We’re living in a golden age of young hitters, but Guerrero’s path is the more normal one. In terms of major league performance, it took awhile for good to become great, but Guerrero has become just that. Yes, playing in Buffalo has helped him quite a bit in terms of putting up the best OPS in baseball, but all of the underlying metrics, ones that really don’t care what stadium they’re measured in, scream that every bit of this massive jump forward is the real deal.

He’s barreling balls at nearly twice the rate of his previous two seasons and his average exit velocities, which were already near the top of the scale, have gained nearly 3 mph. His greatly increased walk rate is more the result of getting pitched around than an actual change in his swing decisions, but there’s a profound maturity to making an adjustment to the adjustment and not expanding one’s zone, a maturity Guerrero has demonstrated. He’s even done some work to alleviate concerns about how well he will age by greatly improving his physical conditioning, gaining a step of speed and turning into a solid defensive first baseman while learning the position on the fly. Playing at an MVP level for the rest of the season should materialize into one of, if not the highest first-year arbitration salaries in history this winter, but his 2022-25 campaigns, even at the highest of arbitration prices, should still be the envy of the 29 stateside organizations. – KG

Five-Year WAR +34.7
Guaranteed Dollars $338.3 M
Team Control Through 2034
Previous Rank #2
Year Age Projected WAR Contract Status
2022 23 +6.6 $5.7 M
2023 24 +6.8 $7.7 M
2024 25 +7.1 $11.7 M
2025 26 +7.1 $20.7 M
2026 27 +7.0 $20.7 M

This is a statement pick for the player with the number one trade value in baseball, though not as much of one as you’d think. A few sources told us they didn’t like putting Tatis so high when most teams couldn’t touch him. But on our ZiPS-based surplus value rankings, he finished second behind Acuña. It’s a lot of money to be sure, but based on the projections, there’s simply not much decline phase in his deal — it will end when he’s 35, by which point he’ll surely be on the downswing, but it isn’t one of these titanic contracts that takes him into his 40s, simply because he signed it at 22 years old.

At the end of the day, we decided that getting a long string of MVP performance at a slightly discounted rate would entice teams more than the same performance (Guerrero or Soto) for fewer years at more of a discount. Bargains are all well and good, but financial flexibility doesn’t hit many home runs, and the Tatis deal is the rare case where you can lock up a superstar for an ungodly number of years without implicitly mortgaging the distant future. Tatis isn’t getting moved, but if the market somehow opened up, it would be an absolute barn-burner; you’re basically getting seven years of an MVP-level talent at a serious discount, then another six years of a market rate free agency deal for a star. It’s like giving Manny Machado his current contract — but getting his entire pre-free-agency production at a great price in the bargain.

I should talk briefly about how Tatis gets to his value, since this isn’t just an accounting of contracts. He’s a walking avatar of bat speed, with plus-plus raw power that he gets to frequently despite a swing-happy approach that leads to plenty of swinging strikes. It’s reasonable to expect an uptick in pitch recognition over time — he’s only 22 — that should compensate for any slowing of his bat. If there’s a worry, it’s his defense, as he’s sprayed a whopping 27 throwing errors in less than 2,000 career innings. But I wouldn’t bet against such a freakish athlete fixing that fault, and he briefly managed it in 2020, which gives evaluators hope that his raw tools will win out in the end. Tatis is one of the best few players in baseball — and he’ll be a Padre for a very long time to boot. That makes him the best value in the game. – BC

There has been a lot of consternation among our readers about the placement of players with long contracts on this list, and Tatis is currently the longest of the long, locked up as he is through the 2034 season. There will be three more presidential elections with a pair of years on either end before the Padres are off the hook for this one, but at the same time, Tatis’ salary doesn’t reach eight figures until 2024, doesn’t hit $20 million until 2025 and doesn’t exceed $30 million until 2029. With the rate of baseball’s revenue growth and the AAVs for top level players climbing, this might look like a bargain, even a decade from now.

Yes, there are teams that would never choose to take on this kind of commitment, but as stated in the introduction to this series, these rankings are based on the maximum possible trade return, not the average, and teams that spend their resources like the Yankees and the Dodgers would open their vaults to bring Tatis into the fold should A.J. Preller suddenly become possessed by an alien force and make him available. He’s the most exciting player in baseball, and arguably, also the best. – KG

2021 Trade Value, 1-50
Rk Pv Player Age 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
1 2 Fernando Tatis Jr. 22 +6.6
$5.7 M
+6.8
$7.7 M
+7.1
$11.7 M
+7.1
$20.7 M
+7.0
$20.7 M
2 24 Vladimir Guerrero Jr. 22 +7.1
Arb1
+6.9
Arb2
+6.9
Arb3
+6.7
Arb4
3 1 Ronald Acuña Jr. 23 +5.6
$15.0 M
+5.7
$17.0 M
+5.6
$17.0 M
+5.5
$17.0 M
+5.3
$17.0 M
4 6 Ozzie Albies 24 +5.3
$5.0 M
+5.3
$7.0 M
+5.2
$7.0 M
+4.9
$7.0 M
+4.9
$7.0 M
5 3 Juan Soto 22 +7.0
Arb2
+7.1
Arb3
+7.1
Arb4
6 11 Wander Franco 20 +3.0
Pre-Arb
+3.7
Pre-Arb
+4.3
Pre-Arb
+4.5
Arb1
+4.7
Arb2
7 47 Mookie Betts 28 +6.5
$22.9 M
+6.1
$25.4 M
+5.6
$30.4 M
+4.9
$30.4 M
+4.1
$30.4 M
8 18 Walker Buehler 26 +4.6
$5.25 M
+4.3
Arb3
+3.8
Arb4
9 5 Alex Bregman 27 +5.5
$13.0 M
+5.3
$30.5 M
+4.7
$30.5 M
10 48 Jacob deGrom 33 +5.1
$37.5 M
+4.8
$34.5 M
+4.4
$32.5 M
11 34 Yordan Alvarez 24 +3.7
Pre-Arb
+3.8
Arb1
+3.6
Arb2
+3.5
Arb3
12 10 Shane Bieber 26 +4.7
Arb1
+4.4
Arb2
+4.1
Arb3
13 4 Mike Trout 29 +6.3
$37.1 M
+5.7
$37.1 M
+5.0
$37.1 M
+4.0
$37.1 M
+3.2
$37.1 M
14 Corbin Burnes 26 +3.7
Arb1
+3.5
Arb2
+3.1
Arb3
15 Gerrit Cole 30 +5.7
$36.0 M
+5.2
$36.0 M
+4.8
$36.0 M
+4.3
$36.0 M
+3.9
$36.0 M
16 Ke’Bryan Hayes 24 +3.1
Pre-Arb
+3.2
Pre-Arb
+2.9
Arb1
+2.9
Arb2
+2.7
Arb3
17 43 Shohei Ohtani 26 +3.6
$5.5 M
+3.5
Arb3
18 HM Zac Gallen 25 +3.0
Pre-Arb
+2.9
Arb1
+2.7
Arb2
+2.5
Arb3
19 28 Brandon Woodruff 28 +3.4
Arb2
+3.0
Arb3
+2.7
Arb4
20 23 Bo Bichette 23 +4.8
Pre-Arb
+4.9
Arb1
+4.8
Arb2
+4.6
Arb3
21 Jake Cronenworth 27 +3.5
Pre-Arb
+3.4
Arb1
+3.1
Arb2
+2.7
Arb3
22 12 Ketel Marte 27 +4.2
$8.4 M
+4.0
$11.0 M
+3.8
$13.0 M
23 Kyle Tucker 24 +4.4
Pre-Arb
+4.2
Arb1
+4.2
Arb2
+4.0
Arb3
24 41 Adley Rutschman 23 +2.9
Pre-Arb
+3.3
Pre-Arb
+3.4
Pre-Arb
+3.4
Arb1
+3.3
Arb2
25 Framber Valdez 27 +1.8
Arb1
+1.7
Arb2
+1.6
Arb3
+1.5
Arb4
26 17 José Ramírez 28 +5.6
$11.0 M
+5.3
$13.0 M
27 19 Jack Flaherty 25 +4.0
Arb2
+3.9
Arb3
28 33 Lucas Giolito 26 +4.4
Arb2
+4.3
Arb3
29 Julio Urías 24 +3.3
Arb3
+3.3
Arb4
30 14 Luis Robert 23 +2.8
$6.0 M
+2.6
$9.5 M
+2.7
$12.5 M
+2.6
$15.0 M
+2.4
$20.0 M
31 31 Matt Olson 27 +5.3
Arb2
+5.1
Arb3
32 Randy Arozarena 26 +2.3
Pre-Arb
+2.2
Arb1
+2.3
Arb2
+1.9
Arb3
+1.5
Arb4
33 HM Will Smith 26 +3.4
Pre-Arb
+3.3
Arb1
+3.3
Arb2
+3.1
Arb3
34 HM Trent Grisham 24 +4.0
Pre-Arb
+4.1
Arb1
+4.0
Arb3
+3.7
Arb3
35 HM Alex Verdugo 25 +2.8
Arb1
+2.7
Arb2
+2.6
Arb3
36 25 Aaron Nola 28 +4.1
$15.5 M
+3.7
$16.0 M
37 16 Rafael Devers 24 +4.1
Arb2
+4.1
Arb3
38 Sean Murphy 26 +2.5
Pre-Arb
+2.4
Arb1
+2.3
Arb2
+2.0
Arb3
39 Ian Anderson 23 +3.2
Pre-Arb
+3.3
Pre-Arb
+3.0
Arb1
+3.0
Arb2
+2.9
Arb3
40 36 Ramón Laureano 26 +3.2
Arb1
+2.9
Arb2
+2.9
Arb3
41 Trevor Rogers 23 +4.1
Pre-Arb
+4.2
Pre-Arb
+3.8
Arb1
+3.7
Arb2
+3.7
Arb3
42 HM Dylan Carlson 22 +2.6
Pre-Arb
+2.7
Pre-Arb
+2.8
Arb1
+2.6
Arb2
+2.6
Arb3
43 Freddy Peralta 25 +3.6
$2.5 M
+3.4
$3.7 M
+3.1
$5.7 M
+2.9
$8.0 M
+2.8
$8.0 M
44 Nick Madrigal 24 +2.4
Pre-Arb
+2.5
Pre-Arb
+2.3
Arb1
+2.1
Arb2
+2.0
Arb3
45 39 Max Kepler 28 +3.3
$6.8 M
+2.9
$8.5 M
+2.6
$10.0 M
46 49 Xander Bogaerts 28 +4.5
$20.0 M
+4.2
$20.0 M
+3.7
$20.0 M
+3.1
$20.0 M
+2.5
$20.0 M
47 Tim Anderson 28 +2.8
$9.5 M
+2.7
$12.5 M
+2.4
$14.0 M
48 Luis Garcia 24 +2.9
Pre-Arb
+2.9
Pre-Arb
+2.6
Arb1
+2.5
Arb2
+2.3
Arb3
49 Pablo López 25 +2.6
Arb1
+2.6
Arb2
+2.4
Arb3
50 40 Jeff McNeil 29 +3.1
Arb1
+2.8
Arb2
+2.3
Arb3
Pre-Arb
Arb
Team Option
Vesting Option





161 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

So, as expected, Jimenez was forgotten this year, similar to Tim Anderson’s total exclusion last year. While I love this list, I would appreciate an honest answer on this as I felt last year there was no acknowledgement that Anderson was accidentally left off.

MikeSMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

His ZIPS projections for the next couple years aren’t that far off Moncada, Anderson, and Robert and he is due about the same amount of money. He’s only 9 months older than Robert and younger than the other two. Seems odd he doesn’t at least merit an honorable mention.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

I give it a 95% chance they just forgot about him entirely. Out of sight, out of mind. Give them a chance to re-do it and he’s on the list somewhere, forcing Ben to deep-six his McNeil blurb.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

He should take Kepler’s spot.

Jorge FabregasMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

I’m not sure the 3 year ZiPS on player pages are updated during the year. I suspect that missing time dinged his projection.

MikeSMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Jorge Fabregas

The Honorable mentions had a section titled “If they were healthy.” It only listed pitchers, but if that were the reason he could have fit in there. Or a couple other categories.

Also, just because I’m a White Sox fan with an inferiority complex, I’ll point out that Moncada was left off the list because his power had waned and he has hit .346/.393/.808 with three home runs and three doubles in the very small sample since the All Star break.

Travis LMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

If you believe that kind of sample contains any additional information, I have to ask: does your fantasy league play for money, and do you have any openings next year? I could use the cash.

MLBtoPDX#2024
5 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

Travis must be watching Jim Rome and now thinks he knows stuff. Mets Fans with Inferiority problems are the absolute worst fans in Sports, even worse than Dodgers and the Cholos

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

Actually, a guy with NO power rarely hits 3 bombs in a week. Its ,more likely an indicator that he will hit 10+ homers in the second half, rather than the 5-6 he hit in the first, especially knowing what we knmow about his raw power, and what he has done in the past. I would take it useful information.

florida ron
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

He’s a DH.

ccjl
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Eloy Jimenez? Being dreadful in the field caps his value, and he’s coming off a significant injury. Still definitely better than most of the 41-50 lot, but he was never showing up in the top 10.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  ccjl

Yeah, I don’t think anyone thinks he should be too-10. But he should make the top-50 and at the very least be a “near miss” HM.

Kevin GoldsteinMember
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

He probably should have been honorable mention, which is what he was last year. That’s the honest answer.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

Thank you!

FrancoLuvHateMets
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Normally quibbling about a couple spots up or down on a subjective list is too silly to even mention, but I don’t get 41-50 this year at all. Especially on the position side of things. I’d take all the HMs and guys like Jimenez over them in a heartbeat.

fredsbankMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Yeah man, there’s a conspiracy, Fangraphs hates your favorite team.

CampingJosh
5 years ago
Reply to  fredsbank

I mean, maybe. It seems more like my favorite team’s owners hate my favorite team (Cubs).

mikecws91
5 years ago

Well at least Eloy got mentioned in Ozzie Albies’s writeup?

dukewinslowMember since 2020
5 years ago

I know a couple guys who, uh, hang out with Scottish teens (sports books, in code). Extremely model driven. They are REALLY down on Bregman, but it all seems based on how they’re quantifying contact quality (it’s not just exit velocity). Gamblers obviously have different incentives than teams, but the gap here is substantial- prior to the season they were sure this was the new Bregman, for good.

ArthurHimmel
5 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Didn’t expect to see a “Scottish teens” reference on FanGraphs, but I suppose it’s not that surprising given the professional origins of what it’s a reference to.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

That ranking is definitely depending on ZiPs being right. If you prorate his current ZiPs projection (for the rest of this season) out to 600 PAs you’re looking at a guy who hits 30 home runs and gets on base at .381 (obviously, the proration does not change that latter number). At that performance level, Bregman is a screaming bargain.

Now, if you want to say that Bregman was playing hurt in June (which we’ll accept just for the sake of argument) you can look at what he was doing in the months of April and May. The OBP is there–he was getting on base at a .393 clip–but he was on pace for only 18 home runs over 600 PAs. In 2020, he was on pace for about 20 home runs over 600 PAs. And, although it’s a bit dated at this point, he had 19 homers in 626 PAs in 2017. I think this is probably his power going forward, which puts him more in 4-win-territory than 5 win territory. That doesn’t make him unplayable or anything even close to that, just not near the Top 10 of this list.

Joe Joe
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Of course it depends on the projections being right. Bregman’s value is based on what he has done (not just June or 2020 when he was playing worse than normal). It isn’t even 162 games since Bregman put up a season that lead all of baseball in fWAR.

MLBtoPDX#2024
5 years ago
Reply to  Joe Joe

Ya not even 162 games away from the Juiced Ball and Stealing Pitches season where his value got inflated. Scottish Teens are on the right patch

fredsbankMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  MLBtoPDX#2024

it’s honestly shocking how a supposedly educated group of people, fangraphs readers, is so willing to forget the cheating and the juiced balls.

fredsbankMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

Well in a shocking twist, it’s a lot harder to hit when you’re not being told what every pitch is.

Baseball Anagrams
5 years ago

2021 Ol’ Cars O’ Car’s Car Anagram Value:

# 50 Fence J. Film
# 49 L Poop Blaze
# 48 Sugar Cilia
# 47 Timon Sander
# 46 A Box Gender Star
# 45 Kreamplex
# 44 Dam Garlic Ink
# 43 Try Paddle Fear
# 42 R Only Scandal
# 41 Grover Resort
# 40 An Aurora Lemón
# 39 An Ion Sander
# 38 Hyena Rumps
# 37 Federal Raves
# 36 No L Nor AAA
# 35 Dug Ox Reveal
# 34 Trashing Term
# 33 Will Smith
# 32 Razor Andy Arena
# 31 Ol’ Snot Mat
# 30 Suit Lobber
# 29 Iurí Soulja
# 28 Glotalicious
# 27 Act Half Jerky
# 26 Jé Míse Arroz
# 25 Framed Blazer V
# 24 Delay Rum Snatch
# 23 Ketel Rucky
# 22 Make Letter
# 21 Wren Honor Jacket
# 20 The Bo Bice T
# 19 Bando Down For Fur
# 18 Clan Glaze (hat tip: mikecws91)
# 17 Oh Shit In A Hoe (hat tip: Jason B )
# 16 Yank’s Hay Beer
# 15 Grit Celero
# 14 Scrub On Brine
# 13 Mkt. Route I
# 12 He’s Been A Rib
# 11 Lazy Radar Oven
# 10 Madge Bro Joc
# 9 Grab Axle Men
# 8 L Rebuker Whale
# 7 Moose Bet Kit
# 6 Ran Face Down
# 5 Nats Ojo U
# 4 Lizzie E Sabo
# 3 Nañodracula Jr.
# 2 La Movie Guide Jrrrrr.
# 1 Rejoin Frat Stand

dl80Member since 2026
5 years ago

Nanodracula Jr is my favorite

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Nanodracula Jr is a good enough title for a movie that someone should write it.

dozingoffdadMember since 2021
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Can’t Dan run one of his movie generators for this? We need a couple stars right?

#KeepNotGraphs
5 years ago
Reply to  dozingoffdad

“Nanodracula Jr. – Death By A Thousand Cuts”

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago

Nicely done sir. I personally enjoy Ol’ Snot Mat, Glotalicious, and Nanodracula (Jr.).

And of course Will Smith. That man needs some more vowels.

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

ETA: With Mills? Ills with M. Slim with L.

Demiurge
5 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Will M. Shit? Will M. Hits?

Demiurge
5 years ago
Reply to  Demiurge

Still Whim? Whist Mill? Hill W. Mist? Eh, they all stink.

Brad WesleyMember since 2025
5 years ago

Giving the people what they need! Wonderful

idliaminMember since 2024
5 years ago

If I may, here are a few more player name anagrams, though not all are players from the trade value list:

Madison Bumgarner: Bamm! Angrier sound! (or “Angrier mob? Damn us!” or “Nord angers Mumbai”)

Marcus Stroman: Smarts run “amoc”

Clayton Kershaw: Oh, walks aren’t Cy

Trevor Bauer, Trevor Bauer: Brave, or true? Or brat revue?

Fernando Tatis Jr: I draft Stoner Jan

Jacob deGrom: Ace job, Mr. God

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  idliamin

deGrom’s is very fitting.

Sooted72
5 years ago

my rumps. my rumps. my lovely hyena rumps.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

I don’t really think Tatis Jr fits in the same category as the other super long expensive contracts in this article, and I think Ben does a good job of explaining why. Starting today and going forward, Tatis Jr is the strongest candidate to put up the most wins of any single other player in baseball. I don’t think that’s a bold claim. If you compare him to Betts, they’re getting similar amounts of money but Tatis Jr is projected for a better year in 2022 already, and the paths are only going to diverge from there. Obviously there are always worries about injuries, and maybe he has to move off of shortstop, but that’s a whole lot of fireworks, and there’s a decent chance the deal won’t start to “overpay” him until he’s in the last 2-3 years of the deal. That’s crazy.

BROD
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

“Starting today and going forward, Tatis Jr is the strongest candidate to put up the most wins of any single other player in baseball. I don’t think that’s a bold claim.”

It is a bold claim, even with the unfair penalty Ohtani receives in the WAR calculation.

(2021)
Ohtani – 5.7 fWAR, 5.9 bWAR
Tatis – 4.4 fWAR, 5.0 bWAR

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  BROD

Well Ohtani is 5 years older and pitchers break so there’s a decent chance he is be a pitcher for the entire rest of his career. It would be a heck of a lot of fun if he kept doing this 2-ways for the next 8-10 years, though.

BROD
5 years ago
Reply to  BROD

fieldingbible.com/FieldingBibleTotalRuns

(Total Runs)
1. Ohtani 119
2. Semien 95
3. Vlad 90
4. Turner 88
5. Mullins 88
6. Cronenworth 86
7. Acuna 84
8. Tatis 84
________________
________________

25. Reynolds 77

Bartolo Cologne
5 years ago
Reply to  BROD

As much as I love him, Ohtani has finally gotten healthy enough to do something special at 27 years old, when most players are starting to peak. But I don’t think you’ll find many people that would bet that injuries won’t return for him in a significant way in the future.

Also:
Tatis at 22, playing since 2019: 10.9 career fWAR
Ohtani at 27, playing since 2018: 11.0 career fWAR (batting and pitching combined)

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’m the one that said he should be #1, but I still think this claim goes too far. I think Tatis does have as strong a claim as anyone for most WAR over the next 10 years (I’d have said Acuña 2 weeks ago), but right now in 2022 I’d definitely take Betts (not to mention Trout) and maybe a couple other players over Tatis. Seems the pretty much every projections on this here website has one or more players ahead of him for RoS projection and the list in the article has Soto and Vlad ahead of him next year, so I’m not sure where you’re getting your projection.

Again, I love Tatis and had him #1, but his defense, health, and strikeouts are three red flags for him becoming the best player in baseball. He’s been absolutely amazing in terms of production over his first ~200 big league games, but we shouldn’t pretend there is no downside risk with him.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

It just hit me after your comment – Tatis is the Eric Davis of this generation.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

“You take that back right now!”
-Every Single Padres Fan

mattMember since 2023
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yep, not comparable at all

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  matt

That was in jest but in reality…there is never going to be another player with an injury history like Eric Davis. Anyone else would be completely ineffective and be out of baseball, retire, or die long before they could match his record. Remember, he lacerated a kidney AND had cancer while he was playing.

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Actually, Byron Buxton IS this player. Davis also had a seemingly endless series of bone and tendon and joint ailments.

Tatis is somewhat similar too. What do all three have in common? They are-were awesome, and they have no body fat to speak of.

mattMember since 2023
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Eric Davis had 1 season of 5+ fWAR. The comparison doesn’t make much sense

bookbookMember since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

It’s too soon in terms of bo th production and injuries, but I fear Kyle Lewis may be the Eric Davis of this generation….

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

I just think he’s going to have an extra 5 seasons worth of PAs over those guys and that’s going to put him over the edge.

JupiterBrandoMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

The health thing is the biggest factor for me. So much of what makes Tatis exciting is his outlandish physical play; it’s not hard to see one bad slide into the plate derailing him. It’s why I’d take Soto to put up the most WAR of anyone still active. He plays like a 35-year-old in the body of a man who hasn’t even peaked yet.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  JupiterBrando

To me when a player can simply change his swing and lose no production, that is a guy who is special. It isn’t like we didn’t already know he was special, but this to me was the icing on the cake. He changed his follow through from one hand, to two, to help prevent shoulder injuries. I remember people saying that it was a potential season ending injury and he was back a few days later and didn’t miss a beat.

Everyone has their concerns. For Tatis it is his throwing. I would venture that will change one day though. A lot of those throwing errors have come by trying to make a spectacular play on balls he probably could of just held because the runner was going to be safe anyways. Also the shoulder. Apparently it was something he has had since he was a kid. You could argue however that as he gets older his body might not recover as quickly and he might need surgery…but that is just nitpicking.

Acuna changed his approach and got better. Less strikeouts, more walks. His concern now is the ACL. Players have recovered from that in recent history, but it is still a concern that his defense could end up worse, when it isn’t great now.

Soto’s concern is his body. He has already slowed to one of the slowest players in the game by every measure, and his defense was never too great to begin with. He could end up having to be moved out of the outfield. But there was never really anything to worry about regarding the bat, he was completely aware of the changes that he need to make, and it looks like it is starting to come to fruition (elevating the ball).

Vlad has a shorter track record at the mlb, and also only plays 1st base. But this was the bat that everyone expected him to eventually have, and he could end up having a Miggy or Pujols type peak which would make him a first ballot hall of famer. Of course he has history of weight gain, and uneven performance, but as a betting man I’d bet this season is closer to his future (160ish wrc type guy moving forward) than his past seasons of beating the ball into the ground.

caskirk
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

Soto is in the 48th percentile for sprint speed. Not fast, but close to average.

carterMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  caskirk

I noticed it must of been picking it up lately, was in like the 18th percent last time I checked. With that said 48% is usually first, third, catcher etc.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  carter

Soto plays like he was advised by his agent: Don’t be Bryce Harper, throwing your body around out of insecurity so you can prove you are exceptional. Optimize offense, improve to merely average defense (his above average defense this year is just SSS, he seems smart enough to adjust that down if his defense effort impacts his offense.). Slow down when you are going fast enough.

While skeptical of projections because they consolidate to a single number that doesn’t reflect an asymmetrical or even discontinuous distribution, Soto is projected for more WAR than anyone else on this list, and in the kind of WAR teams value more (ie not corner outfield defense value). Plus his WAR is of the low variance flavor. The only reason he is not #1 is because unlike almost everyone else in the top 10 he didn’t sign an undervalued contract, which might be evidence of his judgment.

mattMember since 2023
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Why would you definitely take betts?

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  matt

Because I think he is better right now. Tatis has not played enough to make me feel comfortable that his otherworldly HR/FB rates (much better than Bonds 2002-04, but data not available for 2001) is sustainable or that he is not injury prone (I’m less concerned about his defense). Betts to me is a safer pick for 6-7 WAR, and also has the potential to put everything together for a 9-10 win season. Of course, he’s coming up on the D word, but at 29 years old in 2022, that’s only a mild concern.

mattMember since 2023
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

The injuries is my real 1 concern but Tatis now has a career 155 wRC+ in almost 1K worth of PA’s and He’s almost certainly a better hitter than mookie. Mookie’s defense makes it close and I don’t blame anyone for thinking he’ll be better for next few years my disagreement is in the “definitely”. Tatis likely won’t keep up his 37%% HR/FB ratio but 30ish% seems very reasonable

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  matt

I would definitely take him. But of course he’s not definitely better. I might be wrong. Just my opinion.

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

“D word”?

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

Decline

ImKeithHernandezMember since 2020
5 years ago

Seems like deGrom is almost a guarantee to opt-out. Is that the assumption here or not? Sounds like it isn’t.

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago

Totally health dependent, methinks.

MikeSMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Doesn’t that just make it worse? A team receiving him in trade (since this is all about trade value) can have a cheap, injured deGrom, an expensive, healthy deGrom if they sign him to an extension, or no deGrom.

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

I don’t think he will ever be “cheap” deGrom, opt out or no. But yes, I agree with sentiment of your post. Worst-case, he could be injured AND expensive deGrom (i.e., healthy/good enough to opt out, then signs a new deal, THEN gets hurt a ton).

Bjd1207
5 years ago

Slight typo in the Juan Soto section. List his slash line with a .398 SLG but I think that was meant to be .498? Currently it’s .302/.424/.508

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

Fun juxtaposition for the notion that Ozzie has power “for his size.”

A sampling of 2021 ISO:
28. Altuve
29. Albies
30. Betts

Three smaller players on the front page of the leaderboard. But who is right behind them?

31. Alonzo
32. Harper
33. Donaldson

Ozzie doesn’t have power for his size. He has power. Not elite, but plus power. He might break the Braves record for XBH in a season. He seems like a pretty decent outcome for what many hope Franco will become and honestly I think the horrid contract colors too many evaluator’s view of how good he is.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

Let’s play the Player A/B/C game.

Stats vs LHP, 2017-2021

Player A: .330/.379/.596 .975 OPS, .266 ISO, .355 BABIP, .405 wOBA, 155 wRC+
Player B: .319/.378/.592 .970 OPS, .273 ISO, .354 BABIP, .403 wOBA, 158 wRC+
Player C: .346/.374/.587 .962 OPS, .242 ISO, .362 BABIP, .404 wOBA, 151 wRC+

Player A is Nick Castellanos. Player B is Jose Abreu. Player C is Ozzie Albies.

dl80Member since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  TKDC

And Ramirez is 18, fwiw

BROD
5 years ago

“Yes, there are teams that would never choose to take on this kind of commitment, but as stated in the introduction to this series, these rankings are based on the maximum possible trade return, not the average”

It’s pretty obvious that neither of these guys studied economics at university.

Bjd1207
5 years ago
Reply to  BROD

It’s pretty obvious you haven’t discussed any of this stuff OUTSIDE the university, or you’d realize how useless and offputting that statement is. Tell us what they got wrong, no just “im smarter than them”

averagejoe15Member since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  Bjd1207

If he’s making a supply-demand argument he’s doing a really bad job of it by only considering demand not supply.

Jross
5 years ago
Reply to  BROD

You don’t think the trade return would be massive?? The Marlins got Starlin Castro, Jorge Guzman, Jose Devers for Stanton and 30 million dollars!

Travis LMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  BROD

I have found that people who study economics are no better, and often worse at prediction than, people with real world experience.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Travis L

Working amidst 600 high prestige economists, they seem to have the personal risk aversion of lawyers (unlike the cowladies/lads of finance) with the reductionist intellectual framework of bookkeepers. They hate a highly predictive machine learning-based algorithm and venerate academic reference scores. It’s almost corrupt. /soapbox

Jorge FabregasMember since 2016
5 years ago

Not sure if ZiPS is down on Moncada because of his 2020 dealing with lingering COVID symptoms, but with his production and contract he probably merits a spot, even if it’s at the expense of his teammate Madrigal.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Jorge Fabregas

I’d take Moncada at #35 on this list without a doubt, and probably as high as #25. The stated concern with Moncada is that he’s lost his power, but even without he’s got 3.3 wins in 362 PAs. The BABIP is a bit high (ZiPs projects him to lose some of that) but even then he’d be be rocking something like a .385 OBP.

On top of that, he’s signed for less money than Bregman and has a nice team option tacked on at the end too. If this is what he’s doing when his power is down, sign me up.

kid
5 years ago
Reply to  Jorge Fabregas

Moncada should definitely be on here.

TheGarrettCooperFanClub
5 years ago

Pretty much just semantics with where players are ranked within the top-10, but pretty much no surprises here within the top-10 itself. I personally don’t think Bregman is the ninth-best trading asset in the game, but solid nonetheless. Thank you for the great content all week. Really, it is just a good exercise in thinking about value, even if I personally disagreed with some of what the authors came up with.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago

Who would give more for Bregman than Jose Ramirez? Is the one extra year really worth that much? Bregman WAR since 2020 – 2.1. Ramirez – 6.4. The projections in the article peg them as similarly valuable but Bregman’s has to be considered a more risky projection, right?

I mean, if you trade for Ramirez and then you go to him and say “we will pick up both your options now if you sign a contract now for one extra year,” the amount it would take for him to say yes to the one year extension would be less than the $50 million it would take to get to Bregman’s deal ($74 million total, not considering remaining 2021 salary). The extra year of control can’t be worth more if you could obviously achieve the same outcome with Ramirez for fewer dollars (if you wanted to do so).

Jeff in JerseyMember since 2020
5 years ago

My favorite annual series here at Fangraphs and, with no disrespect at all to the writers of previous years’ entries, this is a dynamic duo. Thanks!
It’s fun to ask, as a Mets fan, whether I’d trade DeGrom for Bregman….

dl80Member since 2026
5 years ago

Yeah, cool, thanks for doing this. But I’m here looking to talk about the Cleveland (checks notes) Guardians? Blech.

Boring name, awful font, and bad logo. Shoulda been the Spiders or Commodores.

Left of Centerfield
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

I’m sure there’ll be a post about it soon. I see most Cleveland fans reacting postively to it but I’m with you. About as generic a name as possible and no connection to the city whatsoever. They released a 2+ minute video, narrated by Tom Hanks, and they made almost no mention of the name itself in the video.

Quick edit: Guess the connection is to some statues that are on a bridge in Cleveland. Still seems like a fairly minor connection.

Chaise Kahlenbeck
5 years ago

I’m not from Cleveland, but based on some quick research, the Hope Memorial Bridge ends about a block away from Progressive. The Guardians of Traffic statues are on the Hope Memorial Bridge. I don’t think that’s a minor connection. If anything, I think it’s actually hyper-connected to the city.

Left of Centerfield
5 years ago

I grew up one hour from Cleveland and did college and grad school 30 minutes away. I’ve been to Cleveland plenty of times and to the stadium as well. Never once have I heard a single mention of the Guardians of Traffic statues. The name may be connected to the stadium but it’s clearly not “hyper-connected to the city”.

Jason BMember since 2017
5 years ago

Cleveland Railyard Torso Murderers?

dl80Member since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Cleveland Lake Fires

EasyenoughMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Cleveland burning rivers

dukewinslowMember since 2020
5 years ago

the Cleveland buckEyes

Lanidrac
5 years ago

Cleveland Mistakes by the Lake

hopbittersMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  dl80

Spiders would have made sense for so many reasons, not the least of which is the mascot possibilities.

steveo
5 years ago

My biggest disagreement here is DeGrom. He’s got an opt out after 2022, which he will opt out of unless this injury that he’s had is serious. If so, he’ll opt in and won’t pitch in 2022 and rehab in 2023, then maybe come back full strength in 2024? If he’s fine, he’s opting out. So you don’t get the upside and you get all of the downside. He belongs on the list, but not this highly imo.

Second biggest disagreement is with Bregman. What’s up with his bat? We’re going on 100+ games of decreased offensive output. Is it the dejuiced ball? Something else entirely? He belongs on the list, but I’d put him quite a bit lower with that contract.

ForrestMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

Agree with you on DeGrom. He should swap places with Gerrit Cole simply because of Cole’s durability. DeGrom is 2.25 years older and is showing signs of starting to break down. Cole is still throwing gas and has been pitching at a 200+ IP per season pace since 2017. His slider and change have become filthy. By the last couple years of his contract, he’ll be a harder throwing Zach Greinke.

MRDXolMember since 2021
5 years ago

James Shields must feel remarkably validated by these rankings

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
5 years ago
Reply to  MRDXol

When you’re part of one of the great moments in history, it makes your trade value sky high. That’s why the White Sox needed a super prospect to get him.

Mike NMN
5 years ago

With a player like Betts I still wonder whether someone his size can maintain health/elite production into his 30’s. This is not to question his greatness as a player, just long term durability. Do we have any studies about body-type aging curves?

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

I think the research shows better pure athletes age better than worse athletes, and size isn’t really a factor. I also would add that the steroid era and the era of advanced science we are in now (are these eras really different?) make comparisons to the past more difficult.

But just a quick look at the leaderboard shows that older players are dying breed overall. Only 30 players 35+ have 10 plate appearances in 2021. 10 are over 0.5 WAR and 8 are over 1.0 WAR. And not all of these players are superstars in decline. Some were never that good but have managed to hang around and stay good enough to play.

It used to be said that the late 30s/early 40s part of the contract was just deferred money by a different name. Now, it’s hard not to extend that feeling to the mid 30s.

joelbarlow
5 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

its very weird that he moved UP 40 slots

davegawk
5 years ago

Random question….there’s a few players on this list that let’s say the Mets offered to trade Pete Alonso straight up for Trent Grisham or Sean Murphy or even Kyle Tucker….those teams say yes, don’t they? And the Mets would say no if offered in reverse. Shouldn’t that put Alonso on the list?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  davegawk

If someone offered the Mets Trent Grisham or Kyle Tucker for Pete Alonso in a straight 1-1 swap and the Mets turned them down every single person in the Mets front office should be fired. Every. Single. One.

(Turning down Murphy would be bad too, but he’s a catcher, and you can only play one of those at a time. Murphy at 1B doesn’t make a ton of sense, so that one is not obviously a firing offense)

davegawk
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Agree that Tucker was a bad example…should’ve double checked his numbers this year, he’s been better than I thought. Grisham has a career OPS+ of 116…that’s very good in CF, but if he moves to corner OF, that’s ok, but nothing special. His walk rate props him up quite a bit, if that drops he could be in trouble. He’s basically a younger Brandon Nimmo with slightly better D, those guys are bit easier to find than 50 HR hitters that are still arb eligible. Murphy and his 102 wRC to the Mets for 50-homer and still arb eligible Pete Alonso would be a bad deal for the A’s and good for the Mets? LOL. Murph has a 7 pct walk pct and 25% K percentage and is hitting .217. You’re off the rails on that one, no matter how good his framing skills might be.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  davegawk

Grisham isn’t like Nimmo at all. Nimmo’s an elite hitter, better than Alonso or Grisham. Grisham’s an elite center field defender, which Nimmo (and Alonso) is definitely not. Alonso’s a better hitter than Grisham–the former is about 20%-35% better than league average while Grisham is more like 15%-25% better than league average.

You can make an argument that Alonso is comparable to Grisham if you want but that involves saying that bad defense at first base is not that big a deal and neither is elite center field defense. I’m not buying that at all, but what really makes this an obviously lopsided deal is the contract terms. Grisham has another two years of team control at minimum salaries. This is an enormous difference. This is the second step in any of these analyses. First you check the projections. Then you check the contract. Then you look at the value. The value for Grisham is something like 50% higher. If the Mets made this deal every single one of them should be fired.

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  davegawk

Sure, I would think so.

AnonMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  davegawk

Both Tucker and Grisham have hit slightly better than Alonso since the start of 2020 and are significantly farther right on the defensive spectrum. Now, projections say Alonso should be better than this but still he’s a defensively challenged 1B putting up an OPS in the mid to upper .800’s. That’s just not that hard to find. Sure he’s going to sprinkle in a couple magical seasons like 2019 but I agree with sadtrombone – the Mets take any one of those 3 offers in a heartbeat .

MJD
5 years ago

how is bryan reynolds not #1?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  MJD

Bryan Reynolds > > > > Fernando Tatis Jr
Bryan Reynolds > > > > Mike Trout
Bryan Reynolds > > > > Mickey Mantle

markmark
5 years ago

John Nogowski?????

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  markmark

Has anyone ever seen John Nogowski and Wander Javier in the same room?

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  markmark

He’s in the upcoming #-9 to #0 installment.

Baseball Anagrams
5 years ago
Reply to  markmark

No. Who’s Joking?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago

100/100. Beautiful.

Mahoney
5 years ago

Question for everyone: if the Angels give Ohtani an extension this offseason with the same terms as the Dodgers gave Mookie, where would he (Ohtani) end up on the 2022 Trade Value list (if at all)?

cubfanjack
5 years ago

Great series guys..really enjoyed it.

Mean Mr. Mustard
5 years ago

I really expected Ozzie Albies to be number one until the sun went black, just based on the awfully low fixed cost.

JupiterBrandoMember since 2020
5 years ago

He should be!

Scott Kliesen
5 years ago

No disrespect to the 5 players listed ahead of him, but I’d think Franco would command the biggest return in a trade in the real world.

EltnegMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Scott Kliesen

I agree with you on Wander commanding more than Soto, but Vlad/Acuña/Tatis are just too good, cheap, and foundational to their franchises for them to be moved for anything less than an unprecedentedly massive haul. I think the Rays would at least think about moving Wander for Chris Sale-type hauls that AJ Preller wouldn’t even bother considering

EvanSaber
5 years ago

I don’t know if there’s ever been an article about this, but why can’t a player like Albies sell a portion of his career earnings in exchange for an upfront payment?

Couldn’t he have sold 20% percent of his future career earnings to a hedge fund in exchange for a 10 million upfront payment? Albies is still set for life in that case and still in line for a future mega-contract. The hedge fund should fully recoup its initial investment by the time he hits free agency with the potential of huge revenue streams after that.

I haven’t done the exact math but I’m not sure why more young players don’t do this.

dukewinslowMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  EvanSaber

I wonder if there’s some sort of image rights shenanigans in his contract. Like maybe it’s a way to portion out tv money without it showing up in the contract. The team are owned by Liberty Media, who have those deals with their other properties, who knows? It’s probably just that Albies is super happy with 35 million dollars, but it’d be interesting to see if Liberty has figured out how to do some alternative contracting.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  dukewinslow

There was talk that he just really wanted to be on the Braves long term with his best friend and when Acuña signed the deal he basically took whatever the Braves offered. Still kind of a surprise that a first offer wasn’t better than what he got.

Mahoney
5 years ago
Reply to  EvanSaber

There’s a company (I believe started by former Phillies pitcher Michael Schwimer) that offered something like this to minor leaguers. I think Tatis Jr. might be one of the clients, which would be a windfall right now for that company.

I’m not sure how much Albies would have gotten from such a deal, but if this was available to him in his first few years in the majors it probably would have given him enough security to bet on himself for a maximal long-term deal or FA.

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

I believe Francisco Mejia was one of their more prominent clients, but I could be mistaken. He was involved in this type of deal, but not sure if it was with the player and company you mentioned.

dozingoffdadMember since 2021
5 years ago
Reply to  EvanSaber

These guys don’t have to worry about people taking advantage of them enough? Maybe Albies could get a reverse mortgage.

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  EvanSaber

Actually, Francisco Mejia did this, when he was a prospect with the Indians. I think he got $300, 000 for a future share of a long-term contact. Also, there was some controversy about hit, because later he claimed and maybe was, coerced.

sgp2204
5 years ago

Maybe I’m just looking at trade value a bit differently, but I don’t think Cole even belongs on this list. He’s great (obviously), but I see maybe 2-3 teams that would even contemplate taking on that contract, and I don’t think any of them would give up premium prospects for that opportunity.

shampain
5 years ago
Reply to  sgp2204

Yup. In the real world, almost anyone with a > $150mn contract has negative trade value. These trades obviously don’t happen often, but we’ve *never* seen anybody traded with a contract like that without the team that signed the contract eating significant $ as part of the deal. That was even true of A-Rod, one of the top 10 players in MLB history, who was acquired at his peak by the highest-spending team in MLB, who was in the middle of an arms race with their biggest rival. Even in that circumstances — possibly the most willing-to-spend trade situation in MLB history — Texas had to retain over 1/3 of the contract in order to get back any player value. More recently it was true of Stanton, of Arenado, of Price, of Fielder.

Sure, there are extenuating circumstances in all of these cases, but that’s always true when a player like this is moved. Many of those deals were underwater the second they were signed — that’s the nature of peak-market deals: nobody else is willing to spend that much by definition — and certainly so once one or two of the (expected) surplus-value years are used up.

Tatis Jr could be the exception here, but I don’t think any over-30 pitcher — as Cole is — would be.

diamonddores
5 years ago

in an ideal world baseball players would never get injured and pitchers could routinely go deep into games and throw 120 pitches every start. Unfortunately we obviously don’t live in an ideal world. Instead we’re left hoping deGrom has enough bubble wrap to keep him safe while out and about in the world

v2miccaMember since 2016
5 years ago

I would keep Acuña atop this list personally, even with the injury. Tatis may provide more fWAR over the course of his deal, but Acuña’s contract is damn near grounds for malfeasance for his agent.

ImperialStoutMember since 2025
5 years ago

lmao seeing a yearly projected WAR of 7 for Tatis

wokegraphs
5 years ago

But where is Bryan Reynolds?

nathanjMember since 2024
5 years ago

I’d have Burnes over Buehler too, and it is…. not close, right? Burnes leads (or significantly leads) Buehler in almost everything: O-Contact%, Z-Contact%, SwStr%, Hard%, IFFB%, EV, Barrel%, GB%, & BB%. Maybe I’m biased, I’d rank Burnes is the best non-deGrom pitcher in baseball.

TKDCMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  nathanj

You’re talking about 2021 stats, right? The projections like Bueller more because of his track record. If 2021 were all that mattered, Cedric Mullins would be top-10 on this list.

florida ron
5 years ago

What exactly is the point of this exercise?
None of these level players ever get traded really.

3cardmontyMember since 2025
5 years ago
Reply to  florida ron

rorida flon

florida ron
5 years ago
Reply to  3cardmonty

If a player is so valuable that you wouldn’t consider trading him, does he really have any trade value at all?
And how many teams in MLB would actually put together the assets the Padres would take for Tatis and pay the contract? Six? Maybe seven?
So is that a lot of trade value?

dondixon87
5 years ago

It is impressive that the top 6 players listed were all acquired as free agents during previous international signing periods. Anyone have thoughts on the league modifying the current draft to include international prospects like the NBA/NHL?

steveo
5 years ago
Reply to  dondixon87

There will most likely be an international draft eventually but separate from the domestic draft. But really, drafts are bad for players. Draft caps and slots are even worse, but here we are.

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  steveo

Leagues where the same teams win and bad for leagues, fans, and players. So there needs to be a balance there.

Theo
5 years ago

It would also be interesting to see a bottom 10 trade value list!

steveo
5 years ago
Reply to  Theo

Meh. It’s sort of distasteful and it’s pretty obvious isn’t it? Just look at the biggest contracts who aren’t doing well or are injured.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
5 years ago
Reply to  Theo

Aside from Bauer and Ozuna, who are radioactive for reasons entirely unrelated to their performance and are so untradeable you can’t quantify it, it would look something like this.

1. Miguel Cabrera (this one is not even close)
2. Giancarlo Stanton
3. Strasburg
4. Patrick Corbin (he looks terrible!)
5. Hosmer
6. Jason Heyward

Then some set of Yelich, Goldschmidt, Votto, LeMahieu, Bumgarner, Salvador Perez, and Blackmon, all of whom are decent-to-very-good players but are pretty obviously overpaid.

Aside from that, there’s not much. There are a lot fewer truly terrible contracts out there. I guess Mike Moustakas is overpaid but it’s really not that bad and he can still pay. Elvis Andrus and Chris Davis and Robinson Cano’s contracts are almost over.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The Nats signed Stras to that contract after knowing he would only pitch 16 times a year on average. I don’t get it, but I don’t think the team that signed him is unhappy with the contract.

joelbarlow
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Lindor

airforce21oneMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

No Lindor on that list?

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
5 years ago
Reply to  Theo

Dave Cameron did that, back in ye oldern days…

Introspective Baseball Fan
5 years ago

I would definitely take Trout higher, and Soto top 3. Obviously, the list is close and subjective, but hard to take first baseman/DH over CF Trout and HOF hitting Soto.

longgandhi
5 years ago

Good stuff, guys.

idliaminMember since 2024
5 years ago

Here’s something that worries me, conspiratorial as it might sound: Don’t the Mets have a strong incentive not to let anyone know before the trade deadline that deGrom might be seriously injured, and since his MRI supposedly came back clean anyway, isn’t the best way to avoid any such bad news leaking be to wait a couple weeks before having a doctor examine him, and retain plausible deniability in the meantime? Otherwise, everyone would smell blood: potential trading partners would try to pick the Mets’ pockets, and NL East rivals would go all-in. Maybe I’m freaking out over nothing, but a “clean” MRI alone isn’t dispositive; I mean, has the team sent deGrom for an actual, physical exam? As well as Jake might know his body, he’s also not a doctor; just because he thinks injuries A and B (and C and D) are unrelated, or that this isn’t serious because his prior serious elbow issue felt different, doesn’t mean he’s correct. And this time around, he hasn’t really said much of anything. I am worried.

snood
5 years ago
Reply to  idliamin

ask AJ Preller how that crap works out.

shampain
5 years ago
Reply to  snood

Seems like he’s doing okay.

KMav22
5 years ago

Betts seems way to high for me. The contractual info just confused me. But even if it isn’t as bad as it seemed last year, its still quite huge and incredibly long. OFers the last 3 seasons are not performing at elite levels when they get over 30 anymore. And Mookie has 9 seasons over 30 to go. NINE!

Also, I don’t think this system being used takes the danger factor into play enough while not giving enough credit to the safety factor when it comes to contracts. Another words, if a young arb controlled player blows up or gets injured, you can always just cut them. Can’t do that with Mookie. 300 million could become a giant albatross. So you could have slight value if he does better then I expect and is popping 4-5 WARS in his mid 30’s. But you also could have major pain if he plays like his best comp[Andrew McCutchen] into his 30’s.

Give me a younger cheaper guy.

casey jMember since 2026
5 years ago
Reply to  KMav22

I don’t think it would hurt the team that signed him (or these other mega contracts) as much as you think. On the other hand, they can’t really be dealt easily either. So its almost like they should be off the board maybe?

joelbarlow
5 years ago

i really wonder if there shouldn’t be more prospects on this list- just seems like we’re deeply into a decade plus of prospect hype and they represent so much surplus potential value

EasyenoughMember since 2016
5 years ago

I keep thinking year after year that for those on this list that they keep thinking about their paths to excess earnings. They are very competitive!

From the early extensions to the free agent holdouts to the Trouts and Coles with giant new contracts that folks claim represent excess value. If you signed most of your value away and find yourself on the list, you basically are betting that players like you will be injured or decline (or you hit the max payout). If you haven’t signed, obviously you are betting on your health and performance but you are betting against your peers perspectives. Soto knows and talks about Acuna often.

No one wants to be in this list for more than the first three years of their career.

Antonio BananasMember since 2026
5 years ago

Acunas projected WAR seems real low. Just 2 WAR more than Albies. Is that ACL fears?

shampain
5 years ago

Pretty crazy how much this site overrates Arozarena.

tribefan87
5 years ago

How is Bregman higher than Jose given the discrepancies in both cost and performance?

Tim MurphyMember since 2017
5 years ago

I hope Eloy ends up better than you project he will.

rhdx
5 years ago

I don’t think the discussion of deGrom’s contract status was accurate. You get him for 2022. After that he has only 1 guaranteed year left on his contract. Assuming he is healthy, he could opt out and seemingly earn MUCH more than the 1 year $34.5 guaranteed him on the remainder of his contract. Unless he is hurt I don’t understand why he wouldn’t. With that said, I think he is a little high on the list. Also, since trade value often encompasses the entire league, that he might be more valuable in the playoffs doesn’t really matter to about 15 teams. But Acuna’s or Tatis’ over the next 10 years would matter to every team.